6:30 it always involves risk. because making a decission means to commit to something where you have a certain outcome as goal. but you cannot 100 percent control if you achieve this goal. so making the decission to still commit to whateevr youre aiming for is the risk..
Well it's not very necessary. Most US schools switched to mostly digital clocks during the late 2010s. Been a decade of digital clocks being introduced, let alone cell phones.
@@Oscar-bj9ut That's not a bad point. But still annoying that this just makes people call kids """stupid""" for not knowing when it's really because no one bothered to teach them, and this does not only apply to just reading analog clocks.
No remember before powder bombed the building, they'd already gotten Vander out of the handcuffs and claggor had bust a whole in the wall. They were literally about to all escape before she killed them all
AI "illustrators" already hide the fact that they're using AI because an image generated in 5 minutes should naturally cost much less than a hand-made image which took 8 hours to make. So consumers already aren't able to make informed decisions on who to support financially, especially once AI becomes good enough to reliably fake a video of the process. For this reason, I predict a lot of artists will make the switch back to physical media because faking a real item made with real paint and real ink would be extremely difficult for most people to do, and will probably remain so until your average 100 $ printer comes with a "hand-paint" setting.
@@GrubbyTalks As it stands, I think the digital art space is a bit like a competitive video game with no rules. People will "cheat" using AI in order to get ahead while vehemently claiming they don't, and nobody will be able to tell the difference between a good "player" and a "cheater". At that point you either need to start cheating yourself to hopefully level the playing field, or you have to switch to a different "game" where people can't cheat - i.e. physical art or timelapse videos (for now). The issue is, even if you start incorporating AI into your artwork, the digital art space is going to become so cramped with AI "cheaters" that making a living and finding an audience is going to become a lot harder, especially when your time invested to create a piece as a "traditional" digital artist is much higher than someone pumping out 50 AI pieces in 2 hours. Beyond that, it's also a problem that customers are essentially being ripped off when they're sold an AI art piece for the same price as a traditional digital art piece while being told it's not AI. AI being much easier to produce should cost a lot less. This in turn also risks devaluing traditional art as well. And that's not even getting into the whole part where the AI is trained using traditional digital art scraped without the consent of the artists in the first place. Artists are getting screwed so damn hard. Imagine if esports teams could train AI players based on the existing pro players with zero consent or compensation so they didn't have to sign real humans to play for their teams. Only that they'd still claim that a real person was doing the playing. That's essentially what's happening in the art space these days.
6:30 it always involves risk.
because making a decission means to commit to something where you have a certain outcome as goal.
but you cannot 100 percent control if you achieve this goal.
so making the decission to still commit to whateevr youre aiming for is the risk..
cant wait for part 4. its one of my favourite ones
Schools aren't teaching kids to read analog clocks anymore apparently for some reason.
Bruh moment
Wtf?
Bruh i remember they teaching us that in kindergarden, and im from mexico xd
Well it's not very necessary. Most US schools switched to mostly digital clocks during the late 2010s. Been a decade of digital clocks being introduced, let alone cell phones.
@@jBaO493 I meant like nowadays. It's a recent thing. I'm Gen Z and even I was taught how to read a clock at kindergarten.
@@Oscar-bj9ut That's not a bad point. But still annoying that this just makes people call kids """stupid""" for not knowing when it's really because no one bothered to teach them, and this does not only apply to just reading analog clocks.
No remember before powder bombed the building, they'd already gotten Vander out of the handcuffs and claggor had bust a whole in the wall. They were literally about to all escape before she killed them all
Lucifer was okay, i watched it all and enjoyed it
Love your content bro.
34:49 season 2 "spoiler"
To be fair, the cinderella live-action remake is kinda better than the original.
lol
lucifer was enjoyable imo. eve made it worthwhile if nothing else lol
Yo guys why isnt grubby upload more league content? Any knowers?
ref
AI "illustrators" already hide the fact that they're using AI because an image generated in 5 minutes should naturally cost much less than a hand-made image which took 8 hours to make. So consumers already aren't able to make informed decisions on who to support financially, especially once AI becomes good enough to reliably fake a video of the process.
For this reason, I predict a lot of artists will make the switch back to physical media because faking a real item made with real paint and real ink would be extremely difficult for most people to do, and will probably remain so until your average 100 $ printer comes with a "hand-paint" setting.
Agree with first half but not sure about second half!
@@GrubbyTalks As it stands, I think the digital art space is a bit like a competitive video game with no rules. People will "cheat" using AI in order to get ahead while vehemently claiming they don't, and nobody will be able to tell the difference between a good "player" and a "cheater". At that point you either need to start cheating yourself to hopefully level the playing field, or you have to switch to a different "game" where people can't cheat - i.e. physical art or timelapse videos (for now).
The issue is, even if you start incorporating AI into your artwork, the digital art space is going to become so cramped with AI "cheaters" that making a living and finding an audience is going to become a lot harder, especially when your time invested to create a piece as a "traditional" digital artist is much higher than someone pumping out 50 AI pieces in 2 hours.
Beyond that, it's also a problem that customers are essentially being ripped off when they're sold an AI art piece for the same price as a traditional digital art piece while being told it's not AI. AI being much easier to produce should cost a lot less. This in turn also risks devaluing traditional art as well. And that's not even getting into the whole part where the AI is trained using traditional digital art scraped without the consent of the artists in the first place.
Artists are getting screwed so damn hard. Imagine if esports teams could train AI players based on the existing pro players with zero consent or compensation so they didn't have to sign real humans to play for their teams. Only that they'd still claim that a real person was doing the playing. That's essentially what's happening in the art space these days.