The Triple Threat That Eliminated 1600+ Russian Tanks in Ukraine: Javelin, NLAW & TOW

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 кві 2023
  • According to US officials, Russia has likely lost half of its main battle tanks, if not more, during the fighting in Ukraine.
    Most sources agree that since the beginning of the invasion the Ukrainians destroyed or captured more than 1,600 T-72s. The lack of sufficient infantry support or protection led to columns of Russian tanks move straight into Ukrainian ambushes.
    Ukrainian small combat units can move to positions where they can attack Russian convoys, taking advantage of the terrain they are familiar with.
    And these agile combat units are equipped with West's most advanced anti-tank systems. The FGM-148 Javelin is a state-of-the-art portable fire-and-forget anti-tank system that can lock onto and hit moving targets from a distance of 8,200 feet (2,500 meters).
    One of the major contributers to Russia's desperate situation is the Saab Bofors Dynamics designed NLAW.
    From the start of the invasion, Ukraine's locally manufactured Stugna-P anti-tank missile was acclaimed for its effectiveness.
    The TOW missile, as the name suggests, is tube-launched and optically-tracked. It is a wire-guided missile that is manually steered towards its target by the operator.
    The Ukrainians used more advanced weapons with a higher kill probability to hit these tanks to ensure that the entire column came to a halt.
    Once a column was mobilized, Ukrainian forces could engage and destroy the vehicles sandwiched between the immobilized front and rear vehicles with less expensive weapons like AT-4s and RPG-7s.
    Join our UA-cam channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
    Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
    Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
    Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
    Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
    Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
    Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 291

  • @gooner72
    @gooner72 Рік тому +6

    Javelin, NLAW, Stugna and TOW have been absolutely perfect for Ukraine and their kill count shows you how good this group of anti tank weapons has been in tackling the Kremlins armoured forces...
    Слава Україні, Героям Слава!!🇺🇦🇺🇦✌️✌️

  • @onkellippi-os2dy
    @onkellippi-os2dy Рік тому +28

    Don’t forget the domestic Stugna-P, which can be reloaded.

    • @themc.kennyshow6585
      @themc.kennyshow6585 Рік тому +2

      He didn't. He said that

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      The stugna Is a bit bettee than the Javelin, the javelon lacks power, Is garbage.

    • @ralphpastine4587
      @ralphpastine4587 11 місяців тому +6

      @@joseraulmiguens6699yeah…ok the Javelin is the best self-portable anti-tank weapon in the world..keep
      Dreaming

    • @anthonywilson4873
      @anthonywilson4873 11 місяців тому +2

      @@joseraulmiguens6699 so a missile with twin warheads, that top attacks is fire a forget with 2.5 mile range that totally blows any tank to pieces especially any Russian tank is weak. What are you after do you want the tank to evaporate? There is no tank on this planet that would survive a hit by Javelin. You are thinking about something else you need to do some more research, have a look here.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGM-148_Javelin

    • @jeffreyprezalar220
      @jeffreyprezalar220 5 місяців тому

      All the missiles can be reloaded xcept the nlaw

  • @waiting4t-araot624
    @waiting4t-araot624 Рік тому +9

    That's quadruple threat. You forgot the Skif in your title. R 111 Stugna-P anti tank guided missile Skif.
    Let's not overlook the Carl Gustav.

  • @jaymac7203
    @jaymac7203 Рік тому +9

    The TOW missile can penetrate 35" of RH Armour? 🧐 Damn I had no idea it was so devastating 😮

  • @SleepyFen
    @SleepyFen 11 місяців тому +7

    Pretty sure I remember the SAAB rocket launcher also being useable from inside buildings without killing the operator thanks to a modern shockwave dispersal system. So while the range isn't as great as the TOW, it doesn't have to be fired from an exposed position.

    • @anthonywilson4873
      @anthonywilson4873 11 місяців тому +1

      The weapon you are talking about is the NLAW developed by Bofors and jointly built in Sweden and UK. You can fire it in a confined space as you say, see here. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLAW

    • @SleepyFen
      @SleepyFen 11 місяців тому

      @@anthonywilson4873 that's exactly it - thank you :)

  • @ilkkak3065
    @ilkkak3065 Рік тому +4

    I can't believe they use same tactic as Finns used in Winter War and similar results... Not much has changed in Russian army...

  • @bradleyanderson4315
    @bradleyanderson4315 Рік тому +1

    That avoided talking about Ukraine’s home built Stugna.

  • @mrbaywatch21
    @mrbaywatch21 Рік тому +25

    I genuinely hate the first video of that nlaw being wasted on that T-72 and not being used at the correct arming distance

    • @clivedunning4317
      @clivedunning4317 Рік тому +3

      I think the downward angle of attack was a factor affecting that shot too. The missile won't arm , so that you aren't, theoretically, on top of the tank when it blows up !

    • @anthonywilson4873
      @anthonywilson4873 Рік тому +3

      The NLAW just did not arm it was to close 20 metres needed. Probably saved the operators life. You can use top attack on armoured or direct on non armoured vehicles with an NLAW. It can be used at up to 45 degrees but needs 20 metre to arm. NLAW can armed and fired extremely quickly and can get at targets under cover as it top attack is flying straight over the target and firing a shaped charge through the roof of a tank. It will take out all tanks with this attack. Javelin cannot attack when tank is under effective cover as it plunges vertically on the target. The Javelin takes longer to arm but longer range and is a true fire and forget weapon it tracks the target whereas the NLAW is a fire and forget weapon but flies a predicted route and when over target detonates itself. You can fire an NLAW in an enclosed room with other soldiers present a Javelin has to be a great big room and will clear loose objects in the room. Javelin can take out low flying helicopters and has a far longer range. British army uses both because they each have their advantages. See here about the NLAW: www.saab.com/products/nlaw

    • @clivedunning4317
      @clivedunning4317 Рік тому

      @@anthonywilson4873 Well, thank you for telling me everything I already knew.
      The angle of 45° (upwards OR downwards) affects arming, in addition to the minimum arming range. Can we both agree on that ?

    • @97MrBlues
      @97MrBlues Рік тому

      Its so triggering

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      ​@@anthonywilson4873lol the russian tanks war nlaws for breakfast. And o the frontal section they aré invulnerable to that thing.

  • @Kevin-iv3lv
    @Kevin-iv3lv Рік тому +1

    Use the A1 wisely my friends. You've proven yourselves so far. Keep it up

  • @PsyphaX09
    @PsyphaX09 Рік тому +5

    Stugna-P is a badass as well.

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 Рік тому

      stugna -p is one serious weapon the ukraine are doin some serious damage with it ..... see the blast off one of them ? man you have no chance in any vehicle m1a2 leopard 2 chally 2 i dont care what anyone says if you hit with a stugna p its lights out , theres some mad camera footage of that bad boy out there

  • @sukaseummongkhun2377
    @sukaseummongkhun2377 Рік тому +8

    💙God Bless and Save Ukraine💛
    💙Slava Ukraine💛

  • @blitzzkrieg1400
    @blitzzkrieg1400 Рік тому +45

    Don't ever mess with Saint Javelin

    • @Ujjawal_YouTube
      @Ujjawal_YouTube Рік тому +1

      I subscribed this channel for engineering information and news but this you tube channel turned into USA's fake and lie propaganda tool in social media space as well as such American you tube channels are now puppets of rich weapon manufacturers for promotion of their weapon systems... Pathetic

    • @Matys1975
      @Matys1975 Рік тому +7

      Saint Javelin facilitates the ascension of Orc turrets towards the heavens

    • @JustMe-pq7je
      @JustMe-pq7je Рік тому +1

      And German fire power

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      ​@@Matys1975 lol American propaganda Is funny.

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      ​@@JustMe-pq7je german what? Russia can erase that country from this planet. Ita weapons aré garbage.

  • @patwilson2546
    @patwilson2546 Рік тому +2

    Don't neglect the home grown Stugna.

  • @ronaldlintow3782
    @ronaldlintow3782 Рік тому +1

    Not only the tanks, even the crews!

  • @johnswann6108
    @johnswann6108 11 місяців тому

    Ebay ?

  • @melvinjohnson2074
    @melvinjohnson2074 Рік тому +5

    The Soviet soft/hard kill systems don't seem to be working as advertised.

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      They aré not installed in any tank.

    • @ronaldlintow3782
      @ronaldlintow3782 Рік тому

      ThenRussiansmcopied nearly all things, their Spies found out. Creativity is a genetic Defizite in this dictatorship.

  • @user-uv3mc9hi4o
    @user-uv3mc9hi4o Рік тому

    0:37 eact t72 has 6 pairs of tank rollers. and not 7

  • @tilersun
    @tilersun Рік тому +8

    Interesting. Like this content. 200Gs per missile. My God.

  • @holdenmcgroin8699
    @holdenmcgroin8699 Рік тому +15

    The chance of an Abrams facing Russian tanks will be very slim

    • @phbrinsden
      @phbrinsden Рік тому +5

      The nearest to that was versus the Iraqi Republican guard where US, UK MBTs decimated the Soviet made tanks. The Republican Guard had the best equipment available to them.

    • @_DREBBEL_
      @_DREBBEL_ Рік тому +4

      True but it’ll be awesome when it does finally come

    • @waiting4t-araot624
      @waiting4t-araot624 Рік тому +3

      Maybe T-34s of it comes down to that.

    • @bruno.calico
      @bruno.calico Рік тому +1

      ​@@waiting4t-araot624 Very soon I guess 😂

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 Рік тому

      that was only to keep scholtz fooled after his clause to send leopards( ill send them if u.s send m1a2s) so us said ya but never said when lol ... like the brits and the challangers , they were never meant to make a difference , 14 tanks enabled 400 been realeased to theatre ... by the time the abrams arrives it will be over .. next 2 months will tell all

  • @cfalletta7220
    @cfalletta7220 7 місяців тому

    Yeah guided weapons have really put a damper on tanks then you factor in land mines as well

  • @davidjagan2794
    @davidjagan2794 Рік тому +2

    Absolutely..... Russia will parellize on
    their ground battlefield bcoz heavy
    looses of tanks

  • @Bobby-kw4qp
    @Bobby-kw4qp 9 місяців тому

    How many.

  • @Bobby-kw4qp
    @Bobby-kw4qp 9 місяців тому

    Howany for the Carl Gustav.and others

  • @nephilimivritt8216
    @nephilimivritt8216 11 місяців тому

    i hope they get a T-14 going up against the Javelin on a drone camera

  • @pernykvist3442
    @pernykvist3442 Рік тому +3

    I think Stugna P is the most powerfull weapon yet.
    It can pierce 1000mm of armor did i se on field test
    but its wery heavy etc.

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes Рік тому

      Spike missile nlos is the best anti tank missile next is javelin and next nlaw

    • @pernykvist3442
      @pernykvist3442 Рік тому

      @@RicardoMrMendes The ordinary RPG aint bad at all! If you look at wheigt and price to make. Who win in all statistic combined would be fun to know.

  • @Eurotool
    @Eurotool Рік тому +3

    0:40 comparing a tank force to Greece? LOL I didn't even know Greece had working tanks.

    • @georgedolidze2680
      @georgedolidze2680 Рік тому +4

      Among NATO members Greece has 3rd biggest tank fleet. 1. USA has 5500 tanks; 2. Turkey has 2229 tanks; 3. Greece has 1365 tanks

    • @davidflitcroft7101
      @davidflitcroft7101 11 місяців тому +1

      Where have you been? Greece has always been well armed, all but matching Turkey. . .

  • @gook5219
    @gook5219 Рік тому +8

    To be honest, javelin doesn't always kill a tank just in a single shot

    • @jonnekallu1627
      @jonnekallu1627 Рік тому +2

      That is true and the chances have lowered more since the Russians have figured out that it's not necessary to fill the turret with explosives.
      The videos where turrets go flying have become much more rare since then.

    • @Matys1975
      @Matys1975 Рік тому

      No ATGM is guaranteed to kill a tank 100% of the time. For example, I have seen several Stugna videos where the tank did not seem to be severely damaged after a direct hit

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 Рік тому +4

      @@jonnekallu1627 the feeding rack of the rounds is automatic and fed into the turret how did they not put the rounds in the turret ? the auto loader means a less crew member so your saying they redesigned the t-72 loading mechanism ?? not necessary to fill the turret ??? what do you think it fires ? how does the round enter the breach ?

    • @anthonywilson4873
      @anthonywilson4873 Рік тому +1

      Nothing is always perfect if something disrupted the missile say hit a machine gun or something else an extreme angle defecting it, it might not work as it should. The Javelin has a two part warhead one would clear explosive reactive armour whereas the second charge burns hole into tank and cooks it up. Some times the tank does not brew up and launch the turret there is just a hole. Crew are dead Tank disabled. The high pressure shock wave inside the tank is like being sledge hammered over your whole body! Wish Russians went home changed their leader and lived in peace. A lot less killing required!

    • @joseraulmiguens6699
      @joseraulmiguens6699 Рік тому

      Is really bad.

  • @alpacaofthemountain8760
    @alpacaofthemountain8760 8 місяців тому

    Who thought that using tanks without infantry support was a good idea

    • @CCP-Lies
      @CCP-Lies 3 місяці тому

      I mean tanks were originally made as mechanize cavalry against machine gun positions so infantry can move in but now infantry has to defend the tanks

  • @carstenbellazon2702
    @carstenbellazon2702 7 місяців тому +1

    Russians have already destroyed a Leopard 2 (John Deer). Like in Hot Shots.

  • @dimanroman4803
    @dimanroman4803 Рік тому +1

    Побачим, побачим. Коли? Побачим коли

  • @spymasterflash
    @spymasterflash Рік тому

    Can't wait to add a ZERO to the 1,600 !

  • @jensramputh
    @jensramputh 11 місяців тому

    Russia has kornet. Same difference.
    Both sides lost a staggering amount of tanks.

  • @atg2186
    @atg2186 Рік тому +1

    1600? Those aren’t even confirmed. These are estimated numbers.

    • @fernandoc.dacruz1162
      @fernandoc.dacruz1162 Рік тому

      Quer um desconto, de qualquer forma é um vexame, acabou a suposta poderosa Russia e seus tanques, coloquem os que sobraram para ser destruídos, os caras são burros como tabuas de passar roupas e seus tanques não prestam, é isso que importa.

  • @mehmetcengiz3583
    @mehmetcengiz3583 Рік тому

    the proved losses are 1900 it is generally accepted that the margin can be %25 higher for both sides

  • @tominmtnvw
    @tominmtnvw 11 місяців тому

    Great video but ditch the background and music. It is distracting.

  • @andrewewels3054
    @andrewewels3054 Рік тому

    Smart missiles are making tanks redundant !

    • @davidflitcroft7101
      @davidflitcroft7101 11 місяців тому

      No, they are making them OBSOLETE. It's not the same.

  • @MrJamespeyton
    @MrJamespeyton Рік тому

    Wait till those Bradley’s start playing with the Russian tanks.

  • @gordonmac3616
    @gordonmac3616 Рік тому +7

    Why T55 verses Abrams? More likely to be Challenger 2 and Leopard 1 and 2 verses T72 and T62 as Abrams not expected in Ukraine till the end of the year.

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 Рік тому

      not even the challanger 2 tanks theres only 28 of them and its a huge country and front ... it might be actually be rare to see one , like the t-90 if you get me ? i saw 2 in 12 months its a massive theatre .... im hoping i see about 300 leopard 2 a6s personally anything after that is a bonus then , fingers crossed afu have 5-6 hundred tanks , im praying

    • @goranstojkovic4629
      @goranstojkovic4629 Рік тому +1

      T55s are not on frontline- they are used as artillery support and logistics to keep rear safe from sgr`s.
      Also t72s are improved big time and have modern equipment on them. And tehy are not deployed in numbers even close to those claimed to be destroyed so its obvious propaganda bullshit. In fact there are more t80s and t90s then t72s.
      Abrams was made to fight t72 same as leopard 2.
      They were not designed to fight t80s and 90s and they wont be able to cope with them at all.
      In fact leopard 2 a4 was tested against old t72 (not modernized) and it failed to penetrate it head on while t72 was able to penetrate it head on - tested in Germany after end of cold war.
      That why they added extra armor and changed gun+shells on 5s and 6s. Once they found out those cant penetrate t90s and have hard time to penetrate t80s they made latest variant of a7 but its small number and extremely heavy so wont see any action in Ukraine.

    • @gordonmac3616
      @gordonmac3616 Рік тому

      @@goranstojkovic4629 Leopard 2 and Abrams have been continuously updated since their introduction and Challenger 2 did not go into production till 1998 long after T90 was introduced. Challenger 1 its predecessor had a 300-0 kill ratio against contemporary T72 and T62 during the Iraq war. Incidentally Oryx, (unlike Orkistan) only reports numbers based on photographic evidence and indicates a substantial number of T90s destroyed - and thats without the western MBTs being even deployed yet. The three main western MBTs are broadly similar in their overall capabilities and are more than a match for a T90 (which is essentially an upgraded T72) and the new super duper vapourware, rare as rocking horse shit, lada powered T14.

    • @goranstojkovic4629
      @goranstojkovic4629 Рік тому

      @@gordonmac3616Check updates on tanks and learn something before posting non sense. Challenger 1 in Iraqi war. If we go by these stats you nafo bots put out Iraq lost more tanks then it had. You compare old and not modernized tanks without air and artillery support sitting on open ground against force that overmatced them in every single aspect with war in Ukraine? You are either ignorant to reality either incapable of thinking and making logic based conclusions. Living in past is dangerous .
      Leopard 2 variant 4 that is considered way better then abrams [a1m1] was tested by Germans after end of cold war against at that time best of t72s they got from ex Warsaw pact states and it proved to be no match for most modern t72 at that point. That why they had to change gun shells and armor so you got variants 5 and 6.
      Same goes with a1m1. They found out in gulf war that even old t72s with original equipment on it can penetrate abrams tank head on and that is how m1a2 was created as upgraded version that can withstand hits from t72 including other tech improvements. Challenger 2s are not tested at all and if you want to talk about 1s then consider this - their only advantage even against old t62s is range of gun. In every other aspect its worse then most of tanks.
      Tanks you talk about were created in early cold war era and entered service in 70s when their main "opponent" was t72. They were in process of creating tanks that would confront dreaded t80s but end of cold war stopped West in its developement. So upgrades were only made nit to counter t80s but to adjust to New "reality" of fast and sudden strikes on weak countries. T90 entered service in 1992 and the New tanks constructed around the world were in fact made to counter t80s and t90. But those New tanks are either not tested in real combat either not made in any significant number.
      Underestimating any tank today is not recommended. But overestimating a tank Just because its made in West or east is more then stupid and can cost you big time. They are all designed with specific task to complete and if you cant understand that plz dont speak about it.
      Check a bit real info on tanks and their purpose, then engage in conversation as else you Just show your ignorance and stupidity if double down on it.
      To make it clear for you Su27 scared the shit out of NATO at its time but today its outdated. Saying 30 or 40 years ago it was best and unmatched so today alone it Will demolish any western fighter would be rubbish. And this is how you look at things when you try to compare military equipment of west and Russia.
      BTW challenger 2 was designed in 1980+ and put in service since 1994. Challenger 1 had to Carey ud shells to penetrate old t72m's they not faced in end. So another fake info easy to check.

    • @gordonmac3616
      @gordonmac3616 Рік тому

      @@goranstojkovic4629 we are all sick of hearing from orkistan about how good their equipments is and how powerful they are. It turns out that the average ork just wants to steal a toilet to wash his potatoes with. He was quite happy just being a degenerate, illiterate, medieval alcoholic peasant, but mad vlad, ex kgb colonel, ex moscow taxi driver and the alleged re incarnation of peter the great sends them to Ukraine to push up sunflowers. We will see shortly how well they last.

  • @stuartpeacock8257
    @stuartpeacock8257 11 місяців тому +1

    Unequivocally the Ukrainian Army are defending THEIR territory,land they know and LOVE.
    Now, the most experienced, battle hardened forces of the Allied nations.
    They can teach US how to fight and believe me,new tactics can be taught to all Western Forces

  • @arthurmoreguns2456
    @arthurmoreguns2456 11 місяців тому

    let's talk about Kinzhal

  • @rudyd7306
    @rudyd7306 Рік тому +4

    Praise God. God bless Ukraine..

    • @gianpierocanalis5970
      @gianpierocanalis5970 Рік тому

      And the NATO.....

    • @frankrothe7023
      @frankrothe7023 11 місяців тому

      Don't forget the holy hand-grenade, we should be glad that Monty Python brought it back to public awareness. 🤔

  • @Shahtoys888
    @Shahtoys888 Рік тому

    How can we know this is the truth ? Becoz according to US Russia was losing badly once

  • @Whatyouwanttobewanted
    @Whatyouwanttobewanted Рік тому

    Anti Kapitalista Forever!!

  • @johnfrancisco1851
    @johnfrancisco1851 10 місяців тому +2

    Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦 ❤

  • @karamurat5312
    @karamurat5312 Рік тому +1

    Rusya için kayıp değil kazanç nasıl mı. Eski araçlarından kurtuluyorlar ve içlerinde eski düşmanı Çeçenler var çifte kazanç

  • @jeffreyprezalar220
    @jeffreyprezalar220 5 місяців тому

    I don't think the tow has been that effective in Ukraine.They have been more effective with their own stugnas at distance

  • @troybradshaw8781
    @troybradshaw8781 Рік тому

    Unless brought in all tanks in the area are Russian. Knowing this, it's hard to say what I'm even looking at.

  • @gezalesko3813
    @gezalesko3813 Рік тому

    that pretty much tells all: according to ukraininan officials...
    ukraine had 2000 tanks and 4-5000 APC where are they?

    • @davidflitcroft7101
      @davidflitcroft7101 11 місяців тому

      Source? They never claimed more than ~600 tanks. They've trophied half so many, and lost about the same amount. . . Look at the front-line footage; all those little white crosses are pieces of Ukrainian armor.

  • @JustMe-pq7je
    @JustMe-pq7je Рік тому +1

    With all the high tech heavy weaponry from the West such as Germany, Poland, U S, France Britain and more will make toast of Russia 😊

  • @pabf2745
    @pabf2745 Рік тому

    8500 Javaline that can destroy any World tank at safty distance of 2500m and take cover, and that is only the beginning,...

  • @febrian6933
    @febrian6933 11 місяців тому

    Well, it's expected by the way. Russian tank are old, facing modern anti tank weapon system, it stand no chance. Military always evolved with time. Russia spent more resources on developing missiles.

  • @faissal8997
    @faissal8997 Рік тому

    Actually most of tanks would be stopped by landmines and other tanks.

  • @joshuapaul2022
    @joshuapaul2022 Рік тому

    Yeah, on twitter as usual...🤣🤣

  • @petestorz172
    @petestorz172 11 місяців тому

    The tactic of stalling a tank or truck column by hitting the front and rear vehicles dates to WW2. The Russians' failure to anticipate and guard against the tactic was a pretty basic and deadly error. Having too few infantry to support tank columns is even more basic, that lesson having been learned in WW1. Even at the outset of their invasion, when the invaders were Russia's most experienced, the quality of tactical leadership was poor.

  • @blainelytle341
    @blainelytle341 Рік тому

    And how many has Ukraine lost... That is how you compare losses.. your only giving part of the equation...
    Now tell the whole story.

  • @davidnewland2461
    @davidnewland2461 11 місяців тому

    Law of bergonie and tribondeaux

  • @Haywire-Alguire
    @Haywire-Alguire 11 місяців тому +1

    The cost of 5 Javelins is a million dollars. That's fackin outrageous !!

    • @davemckolanis4683
      @davemckolanis4683 11 місяців тому

      Stop Complaining And START INVESTING In Raytheon And American Military Weaponry IF YOUR SMART KIDDO...

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 11 місяців тому +4

      And you destroy a 5 million Dollar tank

  • @anthonywilson4873
    @anthonywilson4873 Рік тому +2

    Ok the NLAW has destroyed 20 to 30 % of the Ukrainian tank kills, how many has Javelin taken? The Ukrainians have a multiple anti tank weapons Stugna P, TOW Missiles, Karl Gustaf’s so what percentages goes to each type. GPS guided shells must have accounted for quite a few, anti tank mines. Leopard Challenger and Abrams is going to be serious challenge although there will only be 28 Challenger II there. Leopards will make a huge difference with it firepower targeting systems and firepower. Abraham’s will be on the scene later. Leopard 1 will be there in large numbers with its 105mm Gun Leopard 2 with its 120mm with the full length barrel. Challenger II with its rifled 120mm barrel. Abrahams has basically the same gun as the Leopard but a bit shorter. All of these guns will destroy any Soviet tank. Normally before the Russian tank can take a shot.

    • @Bobby-kw4qp
      @Bobby-kw4qp 9 місяців тому

      What about the Star streak.

  • @dudule1669
    @dudule1669 Рік тому

    1600? well, russia kinda short on tanks now, only 5k left 😃

  • @wansoyus6618
    @wansoyus6618 Рік тому

    Why Russian never learn about this lesson? they lost so much cavalary team and don't want to have capability of 5 gen atgm..... this is redicules....

  • @jamiehesketh5115
    @jamiehesketh5115 11 місяців тому

    Challenger 2 just beat a nato tank challenge competition including leapords and Abrahams!! 1st place

  • @MrMpach
    @MrMpach Рік тому

    Not to underestimate, since the Shermans defeated the far superior Tigers and Panthers.

    • @impaugjuldivmax
      @impaugjuldivmax 11 місяців тому +3

      the military industry of the US defeated, not those particular tanks

  • @Bobby-kw4qp
    @Bobby-kw4qp 9 місяців тому

    Such a waste of a good army.Its the leaders that aren't experienced enough to command.Putnam is running the show.

  • @The.2.Minute-Man
    @The.2.Minute-Man 11 місяців тому

    Can you please stop with the pointless back ground music.. Great info

  • @theghostedone333
    @theghostedone333 Рік тому +2

    Hear now the sound of the falling rain, coming down like an Armageddon flame.
    The shame, the ones who will die without a name.
    Who would ever live to remember them, when the plastic bag is a gag on the monument?
    It is clear, the blind will never see future from history.
    Where have all the flowers gone?
    Oh, when will they ever learn they were wrong?
    The Evil One hath deceived them all.
    Their death has now malice won?
    I see the Pale One, his stare still reaping.
    Come now, wake up my children and see what stirs below your feet.
    You kill your brothers for a father of lies.
    You will find that the money is on the other side (of Love).
    Should your heart serve misery so faithfully?
    To a him called fate and misery?
    Let not sorrow keep you, but I the Finisher of Dreams.
    For what do I owe a world of darkness, but to show it light?

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 Рік тому +2

      what ?

    • @theghostedone333
      @theghostedone333 Рік тому

      @@colinobrien3806 Those who partake in war and violence are fools to their own self-destruction.
      Can the good and decent people of our world not see the liars and the lies for what they truly are?
      Those who play us against ourselves, like puppets, as if our sovereignty belongs to any of them who do evil?
      This message is for everyone on Earth.
      Wake up or destruction will take you while you are asleep!
      Russian and Ukrainian sons die for nothing, we are allowing the bitter old men of our world to lay waste to our cities and forge our peril.
      It scares them that you exist.
      The rich man fears a world of Love because it is a world that they cannot control.
      Obey no rich man, for they do not love you.
      Rich men do not have your care or best interest at heart.
      It is no news to you that they never did and never will because they do not have love inside them.
      The empty men of this world serve only money and their self-interests.
      They stand to benefit from your deaths.
      Money is their master.
      You obey blindly the wrong things, thinking it duty or honor like a fool's treasure.
      Your masters care not for you, only for protecting their lies and lawlessness.
      They delight in the subjugation of your weak minds.
      When will you acknowledge that snakes have betrayed you?
      Stop now and go no further for the way is wide and the gate of Hell is open for you.
      STOP THIS WAR!
      There can be no war if there are none foolish or willing to fight.
      You will kill your brothers for a father of lies, and reap your own undoing.

  • @rustynail7609
    @rustynail7609 Рік тому

    Lmao 130 is almost exactly like 1600.

  • @sisaymelese6383
    @sisaymelese6383 Рік тому

    Hard to understand Russian base lost weapons Ukrainian is losing every thing who is winning?

  • @willivonfromhold4524
    @willivonfromhold4524 Рік тому

    Lol...
    Drive by wire...

  • @lyndonkain4749
    @lyndonkain4749 11 місяців тому

    If we're just talking any tank, Russia has a good 10k in storage

    • @davemckolanis4683
      @davemckolanis4683 11 місяців тому

      So You're Saying That All Those Old Model T Russian Tanks Are Going To Be As Good As 2023 Indianapolis Race Cars??? Good Luck With THAT Dream Kiddo...

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 11 місяців тому

      That number is decades old and completly wrong. Covert xabal made a Video about that.
      The actuall number of good ones is 5000 or less.
      Ranks dont doing Well setting out in the open for decades

  • @kimharris2599
    @kimharris2599 11 місяців тому

    Bugger the tanks , that's a lot of dead young russian soldiers.
    The modern day soldiers enemy is technology.
    Rather than countries developing attack weaponry , the lesson learnt is counter offensive weapons to nullify devices such as drones and launch systems. At least give men a chance. Or better still not go to war in first place.
    ☮️
    from

  • @harryjansen3987
    @harryjansen3987 Рік тому +3

    According to US officials, well it has to be true then,they would never ly to us,would they? oh wait.....

  • @jonnekallu1627
    @jonnekallu1627 Рік тому

    "1600+ tanks"
    Lol! XD
    You wish...
    It's also quite amusing that you chose to start your video with a clip where NLAW was wasted by firing it too close to the target.

  • @julwiezdeghorz5089
    @julwiezdeghorz5089 Рік тому +1

    But the recent leaked document of the Pentagon, Ukraine is losing the war. 😂

    • @dannywaller4397
      @dannywaller4397 Рік тому +1

      The documents said russia has lost almost 200,000 an ukrain has lost about 80.000 troops 300,000 including the women and children and old men an women russia killed sono Ukraine is killing them at a 2 to 1 ratio and 4 to one since they took kerson

  • @guyonnetthierry5298
    @guyonnetthierry5298 Рік тому

    encore du baratin change disque

  • @serjeoindahouse9345
    @serjeoindahouse9345 Рік тому

    Мир Украине Свободу России.

  • @muhammadmusa6477
    @muhammadmusa6477 Рік тому +5

    Russia vs ukraina amerika dan nato ... tapi russia sangat hebat mampu mengimbangi kekuatan negara nato dan amerika ... 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇮🇩🇮🇩

  • @joaosantossobral6249
    @joaosantossobral6249 Рік тому

    nice the russos, these much fear of Ukraine...

  • @andrewnesbitt2523
    @andrewnesbitt2523 3 місяці тому

    Random question, but what is up with the music and tone of this video? It's all upbeat with easy rock music, like it's talking about some quirky "fun facts." My goodness, we're talking about freaking war (not to mention one that could lead to WW3), not watching the new iteration of "Myth Busters." Please try not being so damn tone deaf.

  • @RicardoMrMendes
    @RicardoMrMendes Рік тому

    More than 3900 russian tanks are lost in ukraine...

  • @normanedwards7220
    @normanedwards7220 6 місяців тому

    The tank is not the formidable opponent that it was , technology has doomed it to history , it will still be used by most country's because they have them stockpiled , but their all conquering days are long gone .......sadly ,

  • @georgejamesducas9602
    @georgejamesducas9602 Рік тому

    In 60 AD Apostle Saint Andrew traveled to the area of Kiev, preached, and said, one day a great city would be built here with many churches to the glory of God. Today there is a church to Saint Andrew in Kiev. The peoples in the area were Slavic. Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv, three brothers and the sister Lybid founded Kiev in 482 AD, Kiev was named after the older brother Kyi. Kiev the older brother was King. Herodotus wrote that Hercules had founded this land.
    The Rus were Viking tribes that settled peacefully in Kiev as far back as 750 AD with the Slavs there, 400 years before Moskva existed. The name Russia, coming from the city Moskva, has no connection to the RUS. Russia coming from Moskva started with Batu Kahn much later as a vasal under Mongolian rule. All the early Czars were Mongolian and of no connection to the RUS. The Rus were with the Slavs to the south in Kiev. Moskva were Finnish Urgic Tribes; Mosk means cow and Va water, which are Finnish names. There was no RUS there. The ethnic background of Moskva is Finnish-Urgic and Mongolian. The Rus developed the religion, city Kiev, alphabet, churches, and had its saints. The founder of Kievian Rus (800) or the Rus was a Viking named Askold or Oskold (Norse) from Sweden; not Oleg as in the Russian story. Kievian Rus exists long Before Novgorod and Oleg’s arrival there. Askold is the Slavic name. Oskold, the first King of Kievian Rus was in Kiev before Oleg in Novgorod. Oskold had 200 ships and 20,000 warriors. Oskold was baptized in Constantinople (128 years before Volodymyr) and sent the first bishop back to Kiev. Oskold and Dir were the first Dynasty of Kievian Rus. Askold rules from the 40-60s and Dir to the 80s. Askold is buried in Kiev and the first Kievian Christian King & Dynasty. Oleg followed coming from Sweden through Novgorod and was a pagan. Russia as named today started in the city of Moskva over 400 years later after Kievian Rus or Rus. From Kiev, the capitol of Rus, Kievian culture was spread, much like the Greeks Hellenized the known world, or like the British anglicized the world by the English language. This process does not make Moskva to become RUS in as much as Persian are not Greek. How we are misled by a name; Russia. The capitol of the RUS has always been Kiev. There is no other RUS and no RUS in Moskva. Many say Ukraine began recently; but the culture of the RUS is Kievian RUS, both culture and ethnic background. Ukraine is a name given by Poland meaning outer lands. The land of the RUS before the Mongolian invasion was very large. The name RUS is a Norse name which means men that row; there are no men that row in Moskva. So Moskva adopted the name Russia while being a Mongolian vassal, essentially traitor to the RUS; and all the Czars were Mongolian-Finnish. The Culture of the Mongolian was centralized power, and that cultural imprint was passed on to present day Russia. Ukraine’s real name should be Kievian RUS, or Kievskarus! Russia began in Moskva by Batu Kahn and Novgorod conquered much later, still no connection to the Rus.
    Putin & Lavrov should be ashamed of themselves, the USSR was an occupation; it never had the status of a sovereign state and due process of law that would be associated with a free society. Even today the mentality of the gulag exists. There is no freedom of press and speech, people are arrested for speech, there is no due process of law, and the religion is state run making it a totalitarian theocracy. As such, it did not deserve to exist in a free world; and history has shown such totalitarian organizations fail over time and author in many gulags. The true culture of Russia is Finno-Ugric and Mongolian, having nothing to do with the RUS (Kievian), expect borrowed as in the sense of Hellenized or Anglicized "forms" as a comparative reference. The centralized form of Russian politics is a very Mongolian imprint on culture. The actions of Putin seem to be another Mongolian invasion of Kiev; here I suggest as to the correct metaphor. I believe so. Putin & Lavrov insistence to have purview over eastern Europe also seems like paying tribute to the Mongolian Horde. Moskva started as an agglomeration of Finnish tribes, combining a Finnish name meaning cows water and developed by Mongolian culture. Mosk means cow and Va means water. The RUS are men that row, Vikings, Norse, established Kiev 400 years before (750 AD) Moskva even thought to exist. The name Russia for current nation is totally inappropriate. The current Russia started in Moskva; how misleading is the name Russia coming from Moskva that has no connection to the RUS. All the lands should be returned to Kiev; the West of Russia to Finland, and the East to Mongolia. Russia’s place on the globe appears as a temporary aberration in my view. To use threats of Nukes publicly strikes at the heart as adolescent behaviour; surely any nation or person that issues such threats and being an ally to such while not even having war imposed on them is not fit to rule. This would include allies of Russia. Oh yes, I remember, Russia didn't invent the bomb, they stole it in the 1940's and gave it to Kurchatov. Russia struggles with an identity crisis since its beginnings unoriginal to the ethnic groups. Its errors are numerous, 50 million killed by Stalin in WW2, allied to the Nazis to kill the Poles for their defeat in WW2, Holodomor where millions of Ukrainians were killed and grain stolen, and constant antagonist with Europe. We even have the Holy Mother announcing Russia’s errors at Fatima. Russia is a Mongolian culture and all the first Czars were Mongolian and Batu Kahn is the author.
    Oskold was the grandson of Ragnar the king of Sweden, his name is old Norse and spoke old Norse, the name Rus is old Norse, he settled peacefully in Kiev and the Slavs made him king, he brought Christianity to Kiev with his son dir...his burial mound is where St Nicholas church is built, Oleg wasn’t even in Novgorod when this happened, and Oleg is not a Rus nor old Norse name. The Slavs called Oskold the name Askold. After came Dir, Oleg was a pagan who assassinated Dir, Oskold becomes the first dynasty...later when the line of kings get to Vladimir, he is captured at a trading post by the Mongols, the post is called Moskva, and the king killed. Moskva as a city was a Mongolian invention, and Novgorod becomes a part of that Russia by conquest, although having nothing to do with the Rus. Oskold line is Ragnar, ironside, Oskold from the King of Sweden Ragnar. Oleg is via Rurik coming much later. The accounts of Oskold are within the time, Al Mamun an Arab writer of the time wrote of Oskold, the Russian chronicles come hundreds of years later. In much the same way accounts of relevant history are better understood by those of the times, much like the Bible, dating to the original times makes the account authentic. The Russian chronicles are merely a tale and inaccurate.
    Kiev was a city over 1000 years before Russia even existed. Kiev was Kievian Rus before Novgorod and when Oleg arrived. Putin is kidding himself if he thinks any part of Ukraine belongs to Russia. We can see that Israel belongs to the Jews, similarly all the lands around Kiev of Kievian Rus belong to Kiev as a single nation and city state. Russia's beginnings are a wanting child begun as a captive insurgency having nothing of its own; a captive state that was reeking in servitude to Mongolia and invented by Mongolia. The entire culture of Russia from Moscow is Mongolian centralized power, a pagan culture of no empathy and Christianity. The Christianity is tainted as a state religion or theocracy and politicized. History is often obscured by being written by the ones in charge. The history of Ukraine has been obscured by the Soviet Occupation and cultural appropriations. Moscow in an attempt to appropriate a history not its own, rewrote the narrative of history to cover up its compromised origins; Kiev and Ukraine is a history much older and more civilized; making contributions to civilization. Russian despotism becomes the blueprint, foundation & model for every despot nation, look at its allies; the error of its ways has spread throughout the globe; much like the message from the Holy Mother at Fatima. Those that are sympathetic to Russian atrocities can find similarities in their own histories. Ukraine has a democracy at a local level Moscow never had and fears. Russian boundless ignorance is a type often found in the poorest of nations, and usually the poorest have a history of the hardest tyrants over them that also inflict poverty, physical and spiritual, on others they attempt to subjugate, a reflection of their own lives, an abomination of desolation.
    Askold was in Constantinople in 860 and Oleg arrived in Novgorod not until 862. The Arabs referred to Askold as the Slavic King or King of the Slavs which he had been for a while. Pontius says Askold brings Christianity to Kiev from Constantinople and a bishop. Ragnar the Norse King of Sweden was born in 767 AD, his son Bjorn ironside was born in 796 AD, and grandson Oskold (Askold) was born in 820 AD. Askold arrived in Kiev in 840 and had a son Dir, Both become King and the first Christian dynasty. Askold dies and gets a burial mound in a park in Kiev. Dir follows as King. Dir is assassinated by Oleg who is a pagan. Nobody knows who Rurik is or who the father is . Oleg is a generation away from Askold. Olga of Kiev builds a church on Askold’ s burial grounds. Pontius of Constantinople says Askold brings a Bishop and Christianity to Kiev. Russia much later is a Mongolian invention....Ukraine was called so since kievian rus..Peter the great changed the name of muskovy to Russia in 1871 and forced the peasants who spoke ugric to speak old Slavic from Ukraine and call it Russian. At that time kiev had been for 1000 years. Russia is not older than the USa....

  • @ralphhowes
    @ralphhowes Рік тому

    Music is terrible

  • @Tonixxy
    @Tonixxy Рік тому

    Leaked documents say around 600 tanks max.
    So below 600 probably

  • @D25Reg-ie9su
    @D25Reg-ie9su Рік тому

    Slava Ukraine…🇺🇦👍🇵🇭🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

  • @mustafanor4579
    @mustafanor4579 11 місяців тому

    Useless javelin despite being supplied to ukraine ukraine is losing that shows the ineffectiveness of the american weapons.
    Russian ATGM was proven to be better as UKRAINIAN tank got no chance against them.

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 11 місяців тому +1

      No kid. It shows that the russians are ready to sacrafice hige amounts of equipment for this war.
      So many tanks and IFVs where destroyed by the first Hit. This war is pure quality vs quantity

  • @timetraveller143
    @timetraveller143 Рік тому +2

    Z=kaputsky

  • @geofflepper3207
    @geofflepper3207 Рік тому

    That loud music in the video is really annoying and distracting and completely unnecessary and no - it doesn't make the video seem cool.
    Not sure why you went out of the way to annoy viewers but you succeeded.
    I got fed up with the loud music and didn't bother finishing watching the video and won't be watching any other videos you make
    but you might want to consider ditching the unnecessary loud music to avoid driving away other viewers.

  • @bond1844
    @bond1844 Рік тому

    Russia is busy building War Victory Museum, while it's troops and contracted Wagner group are dying and even planning of leaving the battle field. 😅😅😅😅😅 Hail Saint Javelin,Nlaws and His Royal highness HIMARS.

    • @davidflitcroft7101
      @davidflitcroft7101 11 місяців тому

      Don't forget the Bayraktar, which saved Ukraine's ass early on. . .

  • @KKKK-si7ol
    @KKKK-si7ol Рік тому

    BREAKING NEWS: Russia will deploy T34 from Museum!
    All tanks are dead...

  • @colinobrien3806
    @colinobrien3806 Рік тому

    i had an interest until you said the greastest tank battle of the war .... hardly a battle driving btrs and t72s into a minefield without cover facing an enemy up on an elevated plain like vuhledar is , russia destroyed themselves and kept doin it again and again .... they used humans and equipment as de-mining tools with no regard for the lives of their troops , resources they will badly need next few months , but hey a fool and his tank are easily parted

  • @silverfist21
    @silverfist21 Рік тому

    Total lies!!

  • @nileshgandhi2759
    @nileshgandhi2759 Рік тому

    Russia have 15 thousand Tanks.

  • @File-xo5if
    @File-xo5if 5 місяців тому +2

    Propaganda and fake comments, funny.......

    • @gont183
      @gont183 2 місяці тому

      The number of tanks Russia has lost is public knowledge. Denying this just shows you have not done your homework

  • @minutlight
    @minutlight Рік тому +1

    Where did you get the tank lost data? Sure we know how accurate ukrainian and western propaganda 😂😂. Russians are fighting with shovels in bahkmut and still advancing.

  • @uwekonnigsstaddt524
    @uwekonnigsstaddt524 Рік тому

    B.S.

  • @Desh_O_Bangla
    @Desh_O_Bangla Рік тому

    Russia lost and ukronazi cry every where.

  • @agostobulagnirjr3092
    @agostobulagnirjr3092 Рік тому

    B.

  • @danielvicera9202
    @danielvicera9202 Рік тому

    Just a countinue a our press a a grate a answer a especially a focus a angle a in a our war a in a Russia a always I'm Peter

  • @zisanzinu5819
    @zisanzinu5819 Рік тому

    Only in hollywood

  • @georgeleehk
    @georgeleehk 11 місяців тому

    What about the complete destruction of almost the entire Russian army? When will Russia surrender? 😂

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 11 місяців тому +1

      Well nobody ever said that, so make your strawman arguments somewhere else 😂