The Bomb That Ended a War

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2022
  • This bomb may have single handedly ended the Gulf War, but the speed at which it was designed, developed and deployed, is #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #longs
    Music:
    More Danger - WENDEL SCHERER
    Dark Energy - CRAFT CASE
    In the Wake - CRAFT CASE
    Double Crossed - CRAFT CASE
    Realm of Mind - WENDEL SCHERER
    Dark Mountains - WENDEL SCHERER
    No Backup - WENDEL SCHERER
    Inverted - HAMPUS NAESELIUS
    Solidify - CRAFT CASE
    Footage:
    US Department of Defense
    Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @Ossimsauce86
    @Ossimsauce86 Рік тому +15520

    There's something ironic about a barrel becoming a bullet.

  • @marcusmoonstein242
    @marcusmoonstein242 Рік тому +9827

    Fun fact: I read about this bomb in the 1990's. It's code name amongst the armorers who fitted them to the drop aircraft was "Deep Throat".

    • @Tegawe
      @Tegawe Рік тому +898

      Sounds about right

    • @fewetoo4962
      @fewetoo4962 Рік тому +612

      Fun fact:
      Armoror = Navy
      Weapons = Air Force

    • @larry-333
      @larry-333 Рік тому +340

      Kinda sus innit bruv

    • @AVI-lh6rm
      @AVI-lh6rm Рік тому +276

      i thought Deep Throat was the guy who exposed the watergate scandal

    • @DOI_ARTS
      @DOI_ARTS Рік тому +244

      I swear the engineers have been watching too much porn

  • @PrussianPoe
    @PrussianPoe Рік тому +87

    *"The Bomb That Ended a War"*
    *Japanese PTSD*

  • @noneyabuiznezz
    @noneyabuiznezz 7 місяців тому +129

    I was a CNC machinist for 35 years in a factory that made large parts similar to these and this video really triggered some major nostalgia

  • @chilling_at_pontiff
    @chilling_at_pontiff Рік тому +2928

    Imagine chilling 50+ feet underground in a secure sight miles from any combat and all of a sudden a metal telephone pole goes through three floors to your room.

    • @blur3253
      @blur3253 Рік тому +325

      it explodes when it reaches the bunker too, so you catch a glimpse of the pole and then you're in heaven

    • @Erafune
      @Erafune Рік тому +81

      Question is:
      Won't it just go through the entire bunker and 15 feet into the lowest floor before exploding!? xD
      I mean considering the speed that thing is traveling, you have a 0.001 second window where the shell is traveling "through" the bunker before burying itself yet again.

    • @chilling_at_pontiff
      @chilling_at_pontiff Рік тому

      @@blur3253 you mean with your 72 virgins or whatever they believe is heaven?

    • @chilling_at_pontiff
      @chilling_at_pontiff Рік тому +129

      @@Erafune if it happens to land on the bottom floor. I thought their illusion of security falling apart in such a fashion was dark but comical. Specifically if it landed on their floor and they happened to be on the bottom.
      You are right though. These missiles are so over engineered they do most likely over shoot a lot of bunkers and just kill with sealed concussion in the bunker.
      I know the MOAB a few years back landed on the surface and it killed everyone in the tunnels because it sucked out all the air.

    • @chriscolabella880
      @chriscolabella880 Рік тому +93

      @@Erafune Good point, but remember there's a quarter tonne of explosive to figure in, even if this doesn't detonate in the exact optimal spot, all that energy has to go somewhere, as does the kinetic energy

  • @Riverbed_Dreaming
    @Riverbed_Dreaming Рік тому +2740

    I hope the engineer who realised you can use gun barrels for this got a massive bonus. It’s genius. Heavy but not wide, very strong and shock resistant, and with a hole in the middle for explosives.

    • @Barmaley80x
      @Barmaley80x Рік тому +25

      This is just barrel, maked from special steel using long base lathe. With the same approach, they can make catapult which can fired the Moon. No need Appolon, no need Saturn rocket. But this guys frozen in desire. Main problem, that Moon not have such cheap oil in Moon's arounds. Cheap oil is good catalyst for amour-propre.

    • @Philly_Willy
      @Philly_Willy Рік тому +56

      @@Barmaley80x The Saturn rocket was needed, and there was a large desire to rush as fast as we could to get to the moon. It's called the Cold War.

    • @Barmaley80x
      @Barmaley80x Рік тому +7

      @@Philly_Willy but now in present time it useless. But someone tell us what mankind is evolving. Mankind not have ambitious plans. So we are moving to the nature, close to the monkeykind.

    • @Philly_Willy
      @Philly_Willy Рік тому

      @@Barmaley80x We are getting better at ambitious plans, but value human safety and life more now. We learn from the past. Plus, there ARE ambitious programs like SpaceX's starship rocket which will send humans to the moon and farther by landing like a person bellyflopping into a pool.

    • @pyrope5454
      @pyrope5454 Рік тому +73

      @@Barmaley80x Can you speakadah Engrish?

  • @stillededge
    @stillededge Рік тому +349

    I knew about using the barrels for this, but I didn't know how "improvised" it was. "Hold my beer..." 🤣

    • @livingcorpse5664
      @livingcorpse5664 Рік тому +10

      They really just winging it. They speedrun making and deploying new bomb.

  • @sdunn0417
    @sdunn0417 Рік тому +23

    The ammount of CNC footage and also public info in this video is insane..

    • @Qdawg1413
      @Qdawg1413 21 день тому

      You think those desert rats had UA-cam? 😂

  • @captain_commenter8796
    @captain_commenter8796 Рік тому +4762

    It’s amazing and also concerning that people can work together extremely well to create ingenious solutions to kill each other

    • @taktuscat4250
      @taktuscat4250 Рік тому +88

      It's not always the case, they just got lucky from their quick and janky creation

    • @algirdasnausedas324
      @algirdasnausedas324 Рік тому +142

      Skill and ability to cooperate isn't luck alone

    • @Kytes93
      @Kytes93 Рік тому +35

      Because it's fun!

    • @markzaikov456
      @markzaikov456 Рік тому +76

      **To penetrate thick walls
      AND to potentially kill another human

    • @dave_h_8742
      @dave_h_8742 Рік тому +19

      Works on saving lives too but they don't make UA-cam about growing antibiotic strains or operations, engineering is covered though so what's ya point !

  • @firebeardlongfellow5295
    @firebeardlongfellow5295 Рік тому +5075

    This is why engineers can literally connect the dots out of thin air to retrofit something for a given task.
    I mean who else thinks "well we need an extremely dense and stable shell casing for this bomb to penetrate straight into solid earth, and we need it yesterday..... what about artillery gun barrels?"
    *Begins to furiously make phone calls and order ungodly amounts of mountain dew*

    • @user-sg9ql8nk1u
      @user-sg9ql8nk1u Рік тому +252

      *hell that literally how my dad does his shit*

    • @Cobra-King3
      @Cobra-King3 Рік тому +146

      Life of an Engineer at it's finest

    • @targetaps
      @targetaps Рік тому +240

      You have to also give credit to the machinist involved. Often times the machinist will work side by side with the engineers as a sort of checks and balances with empasis on checks. Lol.
      Source: I come from a family of machinist and engineers that worked in the aerospace industry.

    • @PC-xj4wi
      @PC-xj4wi Рік тому +11

      What's with the mountain dew part?

    • @webtoedman
      @webtoedman Рік тому +81

      @@PC-xj4wi Caffeine, caffeine, and more caffeine, to stay alert while designing the bomb.

  • @aonforme3455
    @aonforme3455 Рік тому +108

    I remember hearing about this while fighting in the Gulf War. Not saying it won the war but was definitely a turning point. This boosted our moral tremendously.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 4 місяці тому

      After the First World War, the UK, France and the US decided to take the territory of Kwait from Iraq. With this ABUSE, Iraq was left without access to the sea. And, what were the UK, US and France doing in the Middle East? They were stealing the Oil. Yup... Modern Pirates!

  • @thomaswalsh4552
    @thomaswalsh4552 Рік тому +136

    Nuclear bombs hold the record for minimal number of test drops prior to deployment. There was a single test drop, Trinity, before the two bombs dropped on Japan, which should at least tie it with this bomb. However, not only were nukes employed first, but they were arguably all different weapons at that point: the reason one was called “little boy” and the other “fat man” was because one was rather large and oval while the other was smaller and cylindrical; they were two different types of bomb.

    • @miguellopez3392
      @miguellopez3392 Рік тому +6

      ya but then you have to argue about the development period and the previous prior detonations of a prototype core.

    • @internetuser4210
      @internetuser4210 11 місяців тому +15

      The point could be made that nuclear energy was studied a lot before hand, these guys machined a howitzer for half a month, and then sent it on its way

    • @djsnowman06
      @djsnowman06 7 місяців тому +12

      Trinity wasn't a drop tho. It was detonated on a tower in the desert.

    • @dannydevito5729
      @dannydevito5729 2 місяці тому

      I'm just a regular dumbass but I thought that 1=1

    • @thomaswalsh4552
      @thomaswalsh4552 2 місяці тому +2

      @@dannydevito5729 1=1, but one apple doesn’t equal one orange

  • @robison87
    @robison87 Рік тому +3885

    It amazes me to see a missile go through reinforced concrete and still maintain its shape.

    • @kyleheins
      @kyleheins Рік тому +535

      these weapons are why we dn't bother armoring ships anymore...

    • @magicamika
      @magicamika Рік тому +139

      It is a huge concrete nail, scaled to stab smash the bunker.

    • @mungo7136
      @mungo7136 Рік тому +35

      @@kyleheins Really?
      You have no antiship missiles that come even close to power of the WW2 AP grenades. They have neither weight nor speed. Besides, ships were not armored with stupid reinforced concrete, they were protected with armored layout specifically designed to defeat powerful AP projectiles.
      You do not armor ships because you simply do not have money to do so.

    • @kyleheins
      @kyleheins Рік тому +251

      @@mungo7136 Go study armor and armor penetration properly. I'll wait.

    • @mungo7136
      @mungo7136 Рік тому +3

      @@kyleheins Well, as you have clearly no clue, educate yourself in the first place

  • @theduke7539
    @theduke7539 Рік тому +3151

    Desert Storm was a perfect example of when you go into a conflict with the determination to actually win it. While I am critical of US foreign policy, the wars in the middle east in particular. I still have to stand in aw at that majesty that is operation desert storm, from the degree of industrial and military commitment, to swift execution, to the almost orchestral direction in the mosaic warfare strategy used. There will never be another conflict where so much goes the way it was planned and turns out so effective

    • @flightmaster999
      @flightmaster999 Рік тому +293

      And that was well before everyone had access to computers to simplify everyone's work, amazing how they must have "known their sh*t" back then.

    • @Ukraineaissance2014
      @Ukraineaissance2014 Рік тому +337

      The coalition actually had clear and achievable objectives in that war for once, although they should have either supported the uprisings against Saddam at the end of the war or done their best to stop them. Nobody has clear political goals in war anymore, which is like page 1 clausewitzian how to win at war stuff. Who the hell knows what russia's war objectives are right now for example? They certainly don't seem to know themselves.

    • @najunisa9375
      @najunisa9375 Рік тому +11

      Wat about Ukraine....?

    • @bas8792
      @bas8792 Рік тому

      @@Ukraineaissance2014 large chunk of Ukrainian economy is generated by the fertile and resource rich eastern ukraine. Denazifying or whatever bullshit they said is just propaganda to justify their action and to paint them as the 'hero' to russian citizen. Everyone should know that in the end, it's always the same imperialistic objective to either gain more resource or to preserve dominance.

    • @Gabriel-yd4bq
      @Gabriel-yd4bq Рік тому

      @@najunisa9375 Ukraine looks like a badly organized shit fest. Russians were and are underperforming against what once were their own weapons (Now with support from the west it no longer stands true).

  • @Ken-fh4jc
    @Ken-fh4jc 2 місяці тому +5

    Imagine if they put this sort of effort and expense into projects that help people rather than how to Jill people in a bunker.

  • @billdurham8477
    @billdurham8477 8 місяців тому +1

    Best part about this channel is the story is told with just enough specs to tell the story instead of the a i channels with endless decimal places and useless info. Thanks!!!!! PS if you find your self driving by Watervilet, look for the Iowa class 16 inch barrel out front.

  • @JeremyFieldingSr
    @JeremyFieldingSr Рік тому +886

    To design, build and deploy a custom weapon in four weeks is freaking insane! This is a great example of how just about any engineering problem can be solved when the team feels urgency, has motivation, and an unlimited budget. LOL. This was not cheap! Great video.

    • @montylc2001
      @montylc2001 Рік тому +16

      The P-51 went from beginning on the drawing board to a flying prototype in 3 months. And this was in 1940!!! Ya, it can be done.

    • @clonescope2433
      @clonescope2433 Рік тому +18

      @monty crawford one thing the P51 had was an economy and industry gearing up for a war, you noticed throughout World War II a lot of vehicles and Technologies were developed fairly rapidly compared to what would have happened without the war.

    • @montylc2001
      @montylc2001 Рік тому +7

      @@clonescope2433 Plus they didn't have all the regulations we have to put up with today.

    • @NeverSnows
      @NeverSnows Рік тому +17

      Also shows one of my favorite principles: simple solutions are often better. Using an "off the shelf" gun barrel was a brilliant idea.

    • @JesusProtects
      @JesusProtects Рік тому +3

      Urgency to kill. They will have to explain themselves before God... Before being thrown into the pit.

  • @nade5557
    @nade5557 Рік тому +1363

    minor correction, it has been done before. During WW2 the tallboy bomb was able to penetrate 16 feet of concrete or 60 feet of ground and explode within a bunker. It was actually designed to cause a massive shockwave and crater around a bunker to destroy it rather than directly exploding it. It was used from 1944 onwards on over 30 missions until the war ended

    • @nade5557
      @nade5557 Рік тому +24

      maybe thats a new video idea

    • @webtoedman
      @webtoedman Рік тому +170

      "Grand slam" was an even bigger version. It reached supersonic speeds purely by gravity and clean aerodynamic shape.

    • @bigmock141
      @bigmock141 Рік тому +10

      @@seththomas3418 well they realize how thick that concrete is

    • @barneysdad9193
      @barneysdad9193 Рік тому +40

      @@seththomas3418 It did sufficient damage that the pens were abandoned.

    • @sthenzel
      @sthenzel Рік тому +54

      Apart from Tallboy and Grand slam, another one did also penetrate reasonably well.
      The Fritz X was designed to penetrate well-armoured decks, in case of the Littorio the first hit went through the ships stern, the second hit managed to detonate a magazine.
      After a resdesign it fell a little slower so the risk of detonation benath the target was reduced, but the operational success was limited, as the bomber had to fly straight and level for the guidance operator to radio-direct the bomb to the target.
      Technically it was just like the GBU-28, a guided penetrator bomb.

  • @colinhall8998
    @colinhall8998 7 місяців тому +1

    You make amazing videos sir and I throughly enjoy all the content you upload.

  • @troyboody9985
    @troyboody9985 7 місяців тому +2

    Essentially, it is a giant nail with a warhead.

  • @Fotoschiki
    @Fotoschiki Рік тому +1438

    Targeting military facilities and personell has proved to be long term effective.
    Targeting civilian population has proven to highly increase the enemy's determination and tenacity in combat.
    Targeting the generals and dictator of an invading country has proven hyper successfull. It's easy for dictators to send men to die at their command, while hiding in a bunker. But when they are the target, they smash the surrender button ASAP.
    It's the same now as it was with the ten plagues in egypt in the old testament. The pharao didn't budge until it hit him personally, no matter how much his people suffered. It seems to be a very old concept.

    • @CallsignYukiMizuki
      @CallsignYukiMizuki Рік тому +89

      The "hiding" in the bunker part is technically true, but it's either losing your entire military's leadership from decapitation strikes or surrender to prevent your military from going in disarray. There's a point to be made about the top sending others to die and that kind of shit, but at the same time, you literally cannot have every single general in the frontline

    • @leonox7313
      @leonox7313 Рік тому

      Which is why I am surprised that there have been no violent attacks in Russia targeted to people in governmental positions in light of the Ukrainian war

    • @RolandoP
      @RolandoP Рік тому +74

      Pooting probably hiding 1km underground under his desk.

    • @Fotoschiki
      @Fotoschiki Рік тому +42

      @@leonox7313 Well Ukrain doesn't have the military capability to launch an attack on Putin and if there is one thing the russian army absolutely sucks at it's reconnaisance. They probably have absolutely no idea where Selenski or his generals are.
      Also Ukrain's anti air units are too good to risk sending one of the few higher gen jets for such an air strike. It was the same for NATO in jugoslavia. They couldn't fly below 8 kilometers.

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 Рік тому +2

      Oh wow thanks for stating the obvious lmfao

  • @jeffb8562
    @jeffb8562 Рік тому +338

    I’m not sure what’s more impressive, it’s ability to go so far down, or that it was built and designed in four weeks.

    • @14hereigo
      @14hereigo Рік тому +18

      War is a great motivator

    • @spacejaime
      @spacejaime 11 місяців тому +5

      American ingenuity at its best. 👍👍

    • @vond5829
      @vond5829 10 місяців тому +14

      @@spacejaime
      Education system? Nah, no no no
      Health care system? Lmao wut?
      Military system? yes yes yes

    • @jaimeballester840
      @jaimeballester840 10 місяців тому +3

      @@vond5829 - I hear you loud and clear vond!!! I totally agree with you. Immoraly expensive higher education (colleges), and the most expensive health system on the planet.

    • @thecursed01
      @thecursed01 9 місяців тому

      @@jaimeballester840 we germans have the most expensive health system. but are like...i think rank 40 something? it's terrible. lost my career becasue all i needed was a simple prescription for a learning problem (ads related) 1 year 3 months not being able to get an appointment at an psychiatrist. swiss system is much better. also expensive, but it works.

  • @iamcarbonandotherbits.8039
    @iamcarbonandotherbits.8039 Рік тому

    Well put together video on something that was needed today and was delivered yesterday.

  • @metatechhd
    @metatechhd Рік тому +6

    the engineer who came up with the idea of using gun barrels as bombs during World War II deserves a huge bonus. It was an ingenious solution to a difficult problem. The gun barrels were heavy but not wide, making them ideal for creating a powerful explosive device. Additionally, they were strong and shock-resistant, able to withstand the force of the blast. The fact that they already had a hole in the middle made it even easier to add the explosive material. Watching the story of "The Bomb That Ended a War" and learning about this engineering feat was truly fascinating. It's amazing to think how one idea like this could have such a huge impact on the course of history.

  • @Alex-hm7nt
    @Alex-hm7nt Рік тому +652

    I tell people all the time, the military is hugely efficient and inefficient at the same time. When something needs (or "needs") to be done, itll get done lol

    • @vitsadelhole
      @vitsadelhole Рік тому +30

      Well its just efficient at the task necessary in the case of developing this bomb it was the most efficient way to destroy a bunker, in case of developing the F35 it was the most efficient way to sell forgein policy and domestic corruption

    • @jayes8712
      @jayes8712 Рік тому +13

      Depends entirely on how much funds need to be burnt through, since military projects are not allowed to come in under budget.

    • @J93AD
      @J93AD Рік тому +13

      When I was in basic I was like “damn the army is like the most organized disorganized thing ever”

    • @alesh2275
      @alesh2275 Рік тому +1

      Sounds like it’s not the military’s problem but whether the civilian leadership has enough clarity in their aims and prioritization.

    • @granatmof
      @granatmof Рік тому +2

      It's huge "hurry up and wait".

  • @marjanperveinis8355
    @marjanperveinis8355 Рік тому +428

    American weapons manufacturers: "How deep you want that this bomb penetrate?"
    US military: YES

  • @JbeySaros
    @JbeySaros 7 годин тому +1

    Je re-viens voir cette vidéo exceptionnelle depuis la vidéo sur le F-111 et 3:25 tout est lié, c'est ce pourquoi je suis revenu voir cette vidéo
    that's the meaning of storytelling
    GG WP

  • @Black_Kakari
    @Black_Kakari 11 місяців тому

    That's incredible. Well done. Amazing

  • @aldreenbautista2375
    @aldreenbautista2375 Рік тому +244

    We had gone so far with military technology; from launching projectiles using artillery to launching the artillery itself!

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 Рік тому +6

      Dropping it not launching lol.

    • @jondoe292
      @jondoe292 Рік тому +9

      Laser guiding it

    • @panther7584
      @panther7584 Рік тому +1

      Years later, they will drop an artillery barrel which would fire a round at intended target. Or paradrop a remote controlled machinegun to rain straight down while maintaining a small figure, hard to detect thousands of meters above.

    • @Maddinhpws
      @Maddinhpws Рік тому +2

      @@panther7584 Like that one gun in "Enter the Gungeon" that shoots a bullet that explodes into guns that shoot with bullets?

    • @panther7584
      @panther7584 Рік тому

      @@Maddinhpws That is the most silly thing I have ever heard of and I want it. In Borderlands 3, you shoot with a gun, throw it at a ground then it activate its legs and walks around shooting. Fucking adorable little gun.

  • @jp-um2fr
    @jp-um2fr Рік тому +463

    I had the honour to meet Barnes Wallace the designer of the Grand Slam 10 ton and Tallboy 6 ton bombs as well as the bouncing bombs made for the German dams. There were over a hundred engineering students at his lecture and he shook hands afterwards with all of us. When Grand Slam was used on the Tirpitz part of a turret was found 3 miles away. He did say one thing I remember ' War should never be glorified - it's evil'. He must be turning in his grave.

    • @darreng745
      @darreng745 Рік тому +18

      Paul Brickhill in his book makes mention that Barnes - Wallis was close to tears when he was told how many aircrew has been lost on Operation Chastise so that really does not surprise me, but the Americans love to glorify their technical achievements as it covers for their military ineptitiude in other areas.

    • @mandi8345
      @mandi8345 Рік тому +13

      War is hell. Do avoid them at all costs.
      But necessity is the mother of invention, and humans can invent one mother of a thing if the situation necessitates. The key is to not be the thing necessity is aimed at.

    • @12309.
      @12309. Рік тому +1

      Only Tallboy bombs 10,000lb were used against the Tirpitz. It was enough.

    • @MrEtienne6657
      @MrEtienne6657 Рік тому +8

      It's not war that's glorified here, it's engeniering

    • @Ori_fr
      @Ori_fr 11 місяців тому

      @@darreng745 That really is the issue with the US Military... They're not well trained, nor are they really well equipped. But they have a massive Military Industrial complex behind them, that will (if needed) create this kind of stuff to fuck ur day up.

  • @jasonperez418
    @jasonperez418 7 місяців тому

    I remember this bomb i did a current event report on it when i was in 4th grade.. and that was like 23 yrs ago. But i remember it being called Bunker Buster

  • @wjgolden0830
    @wjgolden0830 8 місяців тому

    You name-dropped my hometown (Watervliet, NY... go, Cannoneers!)!

  • @PBMS123
    @PBMS123 Рік тому +426

    Some fun facts, this bomb was launched upwards, the pilots would flick the nose of the aircraft up, and the fire control computer would launch it, giving it a little extra kinetic energy.
    As the explosive was molten when poured in, the F111s took off with bombs that were still warm to the touch.

    • @tasmanmcmillan1777
      @tasmanmcmillan1777 Рік тому +31

      The f-111's are now a lost treasure.

    • @austonboston4361
      @austonboston4361 Рік тому

      Fun fun fun! Let's kill some people. Sheesh. Gimme a break.

    • @vipe650r
      @vipe650r Рік тому +3

      That’s so cool!

    • @OxBlitzkriegxO
      @OxBlitzkriegxO Рік тому

      fUn FaCt: tritonal is often in liquid form due to heat when the bombs sit outside in sun. when you move them, you can hear the explosive slosh around.

    • @blank1778
      @blank1778 Рік тому +2

      Why don’t we use them anymoren

  • @jakevote8978
    @jakevote8978 Рік тому +148

    as a machinist i can tell you. The machinists knew exactly what size to make it. The engineers just hadn’t proven it to themselves yet 😂

    • @scotthubbard8779
      @scotthubbard8779 Рік тому

      Too right they wouldn't have done this without knowing exactly what it was going to be able to do

    • @TravisMcGee151
      @TravisMcGee151 8 місяців тому

      @@scotthubbard8779I love this stuff. Imagine the destructive weapons we have today in 2023? Love it!!

    • @Darksouls98
      @Darksouls98 8 місяців тому +2

      @@TravisMcGee151There is nothing to love about weapons that kill people. Sure it may look cool and have a big bang but ultimately it's something made to cause harm.

    • @Norweigan-Might
      @Norweigan-Might 7 місяців тому

      ​@@Darksouls98the point is to cause harm, otherwise harm more harm would be called

    • @RubbinRobbin
      @RubbinRobbin 5 місяців тому

      They had to test it

  • @scottscott6794
    @scottscott6794 Рік тому

    Fantastic video really enjoyed watching it thank you.

  • @darylefleming1191
    @darylefleming1191 Рік тому +6

    I was station at Eglin AFB at that time. It feels good to those long days made a big difference. I was watching the video to if they got the facts correct. To my surprise they were correct on everything.

  • @delord1619
    @delord1619 Рік тому +463

    One of the couses i took in college was taught by a metallurgist at the Watervliet Arsenal and it was his job to supervise the heat treatment progam for the bomb casing. The biggest asset of the arsonal was the six jaw rotary forge that was key to the rough shaping of the nosecone mounting surfaces.
    His was one of the most challenging classes I ever took.

    • @AlexanderSuraphel
      @AlexanderSuraphel Рік тому +6

      What was the challenging aspect of the class?

    • @fed3734
      @fed3734 Рік тому +3

      What were some cool details if you dont mind me asking

    • @stevebean1234
      @stevebean1234 Рік тому +13

      they also make the M777 barrels at the Watervliet Aresenal, which is the oldest still-operating arsenal in the US. i grew up right near by in Menands, went to school through grade 12 right nearby, and passed it a couple of times every week going to fencing class.

    • @kevin_1979
      @kevin_1979 Рік тому +2

      Was it Dr. Thorton?

    • @timfagan816
      @timfagan816 Рік тому +6

      @@AlexanderSuraphel trying to spell course obviously!

  • @anto.rubcic
    @anto.rubcic Рік тому +194

    Great content as always, hope u make longer videos in the future.

  • @stevekelley7596
    @stevekelley7596 9 місяців тому

    When we work together focused on a goal it’s amazing what Americans can do. Together key word here.

  • @kingjaffe321
    @kingjaffe321 2 місяці тому

    Salute to the machinists I’ve seen them at work in their perspective fields it a very fascinating job.

  • @walterwhite7640
    @walterwhite7640 Рік тому +69

    After I saw the title i honestly thought you were talking about atomic bombs.

  • @TheMightyStrike
    @TheMightyStrike Рік тому +271

    Great video! Except, the ‘Little Boy’ bomb, dropped on Hiroshima, remains the only bomb to have never been tested before combat use. Scientists were so confident in its design, combined with the lack of enriched U-235 at the time, that the US military decided not to test it beforehand. The worlds second nuclear explosion and the first use of this weapon.

    • @bryannonya9769
      @bryannonya9769 Рік тому +5

      No bomb was ever tested before it was used. Your half as smart as you think you are.

    • @Bleeoshzuan
      @Bleeoshzuan Рік тому +22

      They didn't need to. Criticality tests proved that bringing 2 fissile masses together at sufficient speed would have a nuclear yield.

    • @kingfisher366
      @kingfisher366 Рік тому +8

      The had many times tested nuclear reaction before hand. Not that they assembled a bomb thinking that it will work.

    • @MrHubert1710
      @MrHubert1710 Рік тому

      @@aaronwestley3239 well both yes and no. For fissile material to become supercritical it is literally "bring enough of it close together and it will go off" i.e. "Demon Core" accident. Making bomb of it was as simple as slapping uranium and highly compressing it with regular explosives. Well details are complicated but idea is simple: make boom for big boom to be possible.

    • @Shaker626
      @Shaker626 Рік тому +3

      The implosion design used in fat man and all modern nuclear weapons was, however, a very difficult concept for the brains at Manhattan. It had to be tested at Trinity, and led to the development of many physics discoveries and computational methods. Good thing for them that plutonium was easier to extract from a reactor than it was to enrich uranium to weapons grade.

  • @lordsangone
    @lordsangone 10 місяців тому

    Human ingenuity is simply amazing. If there is a will, there is a way.

  • @bobthingama5090
    @bobthingama5090 Рік тому

    3rd time watching this, one of my favourite videos!

  • @claaymore-cj1pw
    @claaymore-cj1pw Рік тому +68

    "Why you invaded iraq"
    USA: "because we assumed that saddam have weapon of mass destruction"
    "Why don't you invade Russia or China"
    USA: "because we literally know that they have weapon of mass destruction"

    • @Butter_Warrior99
      @Butter_Warrior99 Рік тому +13

      USA: Ignores chemical weapons used in the Iraqi Iran war.
      Iraq: Invades Kuwait.
      US: Dog I smell oil, THAT SH!T IS MINE!

    • @vorrdegard2176
      @vorrdegard2176 Рік тому

      Also add who gave and armed Saddam weapons of mass destruction
      US : ✋✋✋✋✋✋✋
      Edit : why not Russia because they nuke all of Europe and americas

    • @chaosXP3RT
      @chaosXP3RT Рік тому +9

      Desert Storm (the Gulf War) is a different from the Iraq War. They are 12 years apart

    • @JoHn-gi1lb
      @JoHn-gi1lb Рік тому

      The less countries have weapons of mass destruction, the less are the chances that they might be used

    • @kingqw3rty-_-982
      @kingqw3rty-_-982 Рік тому +1

      In all fairness you could say they only had the delivery vehicles to attack close by nations but yeah nuclear weapons was kind of a stupid excuse (chemical weapons are technically WMDs so I guess technically that part was true)

  • @imghoti
    @imghoti Рік тому +61

    Amazing engineering/manufacturing. Even more amazing video! Thanks.

    • @Andre-river
      @Andre-river Рік тому

      Come on don't be naive.ex Yugoslavian engineers made this bunkers and high ex military officers sold the position of bunkers as how they were made...lehen ex Yugoslavia collapse. I think it was in newspapers .2 million dollars for info about one bunker!

  • @getinthespace7715
    @getinthespace7715 7 місяців тому +1

    I always wondered how those bunker busters were made and how they withstood such force of impact.
    The made them out of friggin howitzer barrels. 😂 Makes total sense. Genius.

  • @RandalNichols-li1pd
    @RandalNichols-li1pd 2 дні тому

    I may not be able to do the math but to make an anything buster.
    Oh that, nicely done piece. 👍

  • @Dingusdoofus
    @Dingusdoofus Рік тому +121

    “This is proof that engineers are the master race and architects are inferior species” - Probably what RCE would say if he saw this video.

    • @nukeengineer5214
      @nukeengineer5214 Рік тому +2

      As a P.E. I agree

    • @1yoan3
      @1yoan3 Рік тому +1

      As a French equivalent of P.E., I agree.

    • @nukeengineer5214
      @nukeengineer5214 Рік тому +1

      @@airgin3000 Professional Engineer, is a license in the US which allows you to certify designs, calculations as required by law. It is mandatory for Nuclear Power Plants.

    • @realulli
      @realulli Рік тому +2

      Engineers build weapons, architects build targets.

    • @AlexCS8
      @AlexCS8 Рік тому

      @@realulli Isn't Architecture part of Engineering?

  • @grndiesel
    @grndiesel Рік тому +119

    No doubt much of the ideas needed to build the bomb already existed in the minds of various engineers, machinists and technicians long before the need was officially recognized. It's really amazing what can happen when a motivated team is given the space and resources to achieve a common goal. Rare, but amazing.

    • @XMysticHerox
      @XMysticHerox Рік тому +2

      Bunker busters were not a new concept. Just not something that was needed since the Korean war.

    • @askewcat3209
      @askewcat3209 Рік тому

      @@XMysticHerox hes saying that even though there wasnt a present need beforehand for a new bunker buster the engineers never stopped designing just incase a better bunker buster was needed

  • @commentfailedtopost
    @commentfailedtopost 7 місяців тому

    New weapons don't usually end wars, they start new ones.

  • @adamjindrisek585
    @adamjindrisek585 8 місяців тому

    Imagine the person getting the idea to use the howitzer barrels technically ended a war

  • @V8AmericanMuscleCar
    @V8AmericanMuscleCar Рік тому +189

    A family friend (a professional welder) worked in Iraq in the late 80's on these bunkers. I remember him saying that those bunkers were very strong, several meters of concrete and a lot of steel, but this rocket went into that bunker like in a marmalade.

    • @jbbeiser983
      @jbbeiser983 Рік тому +16

      And killed 480 civilians

    • @alperakyuz9702
      @alperakyuz9702 Рік тому +3

      @@jbbeiser983 it was al amirriyah shelter attack, it didnt use 5000lb bunker busters but 2 2000lb paveways from f117 nighthawks.

    • @artkl494
      @artkl494 Рік тому +15

      @@jbbeiser983 no you got it wrong,480 units of biowaste terminated,that's how you spell it

    • @jabibiszum6764
      @jabibiszum6764 Рік тому

      @@artkl494 Correctly spelled is toxic biowaste includes you

    • @artkl494
      @artkl494 Рік тому +7

      @@jabibiszum6764 biowaste unit got mad💀

  • @jessgatt2306
    @jessgatt2306 Рік тому +246

    During WW2 the Germans fielded a cannon displacing 800mm, yeah, 800mm, and it fired seven ton point three tonne armor piercing shell. The used it on the ammo magazine at Sevastopol, in the Crimea. That shell penetrated some forty feet of steel re-enforced concrete. There's old tech for you, the gun weighed 1,20o tonnes.

    • @metermatch
      @metermatch Рік тому +27

      Gustav gun I think it was called.

    • @vincea1830
      @vincea1830 Рік тому +47

      Yep, every shot destroyed the barrel. Highly ineffective due to inability to keep up continuous fire + lack of accuracy...

    • @hphp31416
      @hphp31416 Рік тому +8

      @@metermatchit was Dora, 4 track rail gun

    • @zanger4002
      @zanger4002 Рік тому +7

      There's that, the German railway gun. And there's also the giant mortar they built (technically an SPG) which used a 2,170 kg shell called the Karl-Gerat.

    • @zanger4002
      @zanger4002 Рік тому +7

      @@hphp31416 Dora was the name of one specific gun produced. The Gustav gun is the name of the design itself.

  • @ryangrogan6839
    @ryangrogan6839 10 місяців тому +12

    I wonder how they knew how to fuse the explosives properly. They must have known the approximate depth, or some sort of system that counts how many floors it busted through. Very impressive when you take this into account.

    • @DavidOfWhitehills
      @DavidOfWhitehills 9 місяців тому +2

      When the deceleration stops .

    • @somewhatblankpaper1423
      @somewhatblankpaper1423 7 місяців тому +4

      Doesn’t necessarily work as the deceleration could get to 0 after penetrating below the bunker, and the explosion doesn’t do the intended damage.
      But knowing the max depth of the missile after hitting the underground bunker and the min depth of penetration underground, it’s feasible to increase the explosive power so that it deals the intended damage anywhere within the range.
      Also, maybe the bomb doesn’t aways work as intended either and multiple drops were needed.

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 2 місяці тому +2

      Literally just math. Time delay based on X000psi concrete and the expected impact velocity and penetration/deceleration.
      There are more modern solutions now though such as the FMU-167 Void Sensing Fuze.

  • @bobjohnson3940
    @bobjohnson3940 Рік тому +1

    Being any one of the people hanging out in your bunker as that showed up would seriously ruin my day

  • @drekson23
    @drekson23 Рік тому +16

    I am proud as a machinist and welder. We can do almost everything. Not just war equipment but for everyday industrial machines.

  • @TheLiasas
    @TheLiasas Рік тому +22

    Man, waking up to have a new video of yours for our delight while I take lunch before going to work is what makes for my best days nowadays! Keep up your awesomeness :)

  • @hobogrifter
    @hobogrifter 11 місяців тому +3

    At about 0:42 you could see the map in which it shows the Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Causeway, the map is showing the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 when the causeway started construction in 2013.

  • @33sixpack
    @33sixpack Рік тому

    That was a very interesting little tidbit to say the least. Wow!.... just wow!

  • @Labont
    @Labont Рік тому +15

    Top Gun maverick be like when the bomb passes trough 1.09873 cm gap in a vent

  • @alexeiutgoff7955
    @alexeiutgoff7955 Рік тому +9

    "The super penetrator"
    Ah, so that's why this showed up in my recommended. Makes sense.

  • @matthew_mayton
    @matthew_mayton Рік тому

    This is so cool it’s like ‘How It’s Made’

  • @JDogVids
    @JDogVids 7 місяців тому

    That's funny I was actually about to look this video up coming from dark tech and it automatically played this 😂

  • @travis7099
    @travis7099 Рік тому +9

    Definitely my favorite video from your channel 👍🏻
    Keep up the great work man!

  • @jamezbrian4135
    @jamezbrian4135 Рік тому +34

    I am a Desert Storm Vet (USMC) and this is the first time I read about this. We did not have the internet or cell phones. We got what the command told us and that was it. Some folks listened to that Radio Europe thing but even then most of that news was not about us. I also thought all of the USA supported us. I learned after we got back that many did not support the war. I did get to use the AT & T phone station, in the desert, once. We got 5 minutes and that was it.

    • @daddyrabbit835
      @daddyrabbit835 Рік тому +2

      Fuck yeah. I remember the phone calls. We moved back into Kuwait after the "100-hour War". I was with the 3rd Armored Div. We engaged the Republican Guard units that were in Iraq serving as a theater reserve for the Iraqi troops in Kuwait. Anyway, I can't remember if the calls were free or if I had to use my phone card. Those were some pretty sweet phone calls.

    • @jkfdsjlkdvccx
      @jkfdsjlkdvccx Рік тому +1

      I can't speak for everyone, but the press coverage was universally positive in support of the war. CNN made it's debut talking about how great and justified the war was.

  • @ronrospo9016
    @ronrospo9016 Рік тому

    I worked on the bunker buster as an assembler lots of pressure to get it done proud that it worked.

  • @dontask8979
    @dontask8979 7 місяців тому

    Makes you wonder how deep the original size and weight would have gone.

  • @ChrisV267
    @ChrisV267 Рік тому +10

    My mom grew up in Watervliet, and I have been past this armory dozens of times. Truly awesome to learn some history about it, especially when I wasn't expecting it. A true, "No way" moment for me

    • @ajflufenheimer6779
      @ajflufenheimer6779 Рік тому +1

      I live in the same area. And never knew this happend there. Also always admire the artillery you can see from the road

  • @johnturnbull7798
    @johnturnbull7798 Рік тому +81

    As mentioned by others, deep penetration bombs are not new. Both Tallboy and Grand Slam were designed specifically for this task. In WW2 smart bombs were something for the future so both were free fall supersonic missiles. When Barnes Wallis first came up with the idea of an earthquake bomb and its size the concept was that it would be dropped from 35,000 feet but at the time no plane carry the weight or get up to that altitude. Eventually the Lancaster was developed to be capable of carrying the weight but could only lift it to 21,000 feet

    • @aaroncabatingan5238
      @aaroncabatingan5238 Рік тому

      @CAPTAIN SHARKHORSE :) You wanna bet that the US actually built and tested one recently?

  • @sanchitvishwakarma1108
    @sanchitvishwakarma1108 Рік тому

    Content like this is extremely rare

  • @brandonjohnson8880
    @brandonjohnson8880 Рік тому

    Very cool to be on the team that helped develop this monster.

    • @Loquacious_Jackson
      @Loquacious_Jackson Рік тому

      We never went to the moon, stop believing the lies

    • @kataisaki505
      @kataisaki505 Рік тому

      @@Loquacious_Jackson what's going to the Moon has anything to do with this?

  • @robertlaw4073
    @robertlaw4073 Рік тому +8

    Such an amazing story. As a HS student I recall touring the Watervelite facility around 1993 with my science class. The emphasis was on how they were making composite firing tubes with spun composite materials. This was after the Clinton defense cuts. No mention was made at all about their ability to turn howitzer barrels into bombs. I suppose with that war over, the capacity to perform such a task became superfluous to replacing expert machinists with automated machinery capable of spinning together a tube.

  • @duncanmays1368
    @duncanmays1368 Рік тому +16

    War is unpredictable and the ability to rapidly innovate to adapt to new scenarios is what wins in the long run. The US has the best military on the planet by far, and its dynamism is a big reason for this success.

  • @jamesg2382
    @jamesg2382 Рік тому

    Man that is pretty awesome. Great story

  • @SkipGamesBR
    @SkipGamesBR 4 дні тому +1

    Sensacional explicação breve mas muito direta com informações precisas parabéns ao editor, grande abraço a todos os brasileiros!

  • @luasmartinez1262
    @luasmartinez1262 Рік тому +23

    I just want to say that this weapon was developed in the mid to late 80's. My dad helped build the casings for these weapons.

    • @kosakata8632
      @kosakata8632 Рік тому

      What you proud of? US war investment what make US economy backward and got mountain of debt. Your generation whose must pay for the stupidity of your father's generation.
      You can imagine if US use the money for developing bullet train, high tech infrastructures, nano chips or flying car? how modern US today?

    • @rickyfitness252
      @rickyfitness252 Рік тому

      Your dad help kill children. Then you have a bloodline of evil

  • @Snrby
    @Snrby Рік тому +3

    Thank you for including metric units in your video so the majority of the world outside the USA, Myanmar and Lima can understand the measurements of weight and depth.

  • @Silo-Ren
    @Silo-Ren Рік тому +2

    This is one of my favorite videos when it comes to ingenuity. 🇺🇸

  • @RuiPlaneSpotter
    @RuiPlaneSpotter 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice my friend!

  • @zacharyohare6029
    @zacharyohare6029 Рік тому +14

    having walked through some of these burned out bunkers personally... dam impressive. must have been wild to be on the receiving side after hearing what happened

  • @ninjajagyr
    @ninjajagyr Рік тому +168

    I recall hearing a story where retired battleship cannons barrels would be recycled into bunker busting bombs

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 Рік тому +2

      No you didn’t lmao, you know how big and heavy battleship barrels are???? That would be so impractical and the plane would literally only be able to carry one... if it could even take off 😂😂🤡🤡

    • @Frozander
      @Frozander Рік тому +35

      @@K20_EM1 I mean... Hearing it doesn't mean it is true. You need to chill.

    • @Crentshen
      @Crentshen Рік тому

      @@Frozander I’ve heard this one too soooo

    • @Crentshen
      @Crentshen Рік тому +29

      @@K20_EM1 not to smart are you eh, he’s not talking about the FULL LENGTH of the barrel. Split up into sub sections for multiple bombs..... MOAB is 21,600lbs and a C130 can carry it easily or even a C-5

    • @bas8792
      @bas8792 Рік тому

      @@Crentshen those are transport plane and never meant to be used as bomber

  • @thehapa
    @thehapa Рік тому

    From barrel to bomb; how poetic

  • @steveallen1863
    @steveallen1863 3 місяці тому +1

    Back in 1991, after that bunker buster was dropped the back story was far different. Press claimed a B-52 took off from Barksdale AFB, made a 44 hour round trip. They showed a 60' crater. They said pilot received Distinguished Flying award. Then again, the day after the beginning of air campaign, San Jose Mercury newspaper had headlines that said " 150,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed by B-52 attack on Iraqi Army staging compound".
    The BS from the news is pretty astounding. However they did get all the facts about how the bomb was made from artillery barrel sawed off and the knew exactly how much molten explosives were poured into bomb.
    Just a few observations.

  • @cyrilurama1737
    @cyrilurama1737 Рік тому +123

    Putting our time and effort in activities and investments that will yield a profitable return in the future is what we should be aiming for. Success depends on the actions or steps you take to achieve it.

    • @lucialuzgilosluz2114
      @lucialuzgilosluz2114 Рік тому +3

      Starting early is the best way of getting ahead to build wealth, investing remains a priority. The stock market has plenty of opportunities to earn a decent payouts, with the right skills and proper understanding of how the market works.

    • @anongpornthip5872
      @anongpornthip5872 Рік тому

      Venturing into the bitcoin without an adequate orientation with a professional broker for accurate signals, you might lose all your hard-earned money

    • @richardrosendell9460
      @richardrosendell9460 Рік тому

      Binary trading is a good and reliable way of building wealth which also create opportunities for crypto Believers.

    • @janiceluckyspring6979
      @janiceluckyspring6979 Рік тому

      I'm into Real Estate, but I took the decision to invest in the Crypto market and have been getting good returns on my investments. The market is also an effective way to grow wealth.

    • @user-sf7yh6yl3k
      @user-sf7yh6yl3k Рік тому

      I have been following tutorials for a month now still the same streak of losing. 'n Tutorials alone won't help, you need to improve your knowledge about it or seek help from experts, that's the only successful way.

  • @matthewrossilini5808
    @matthewrossilini5808 Рік тому +45

    As a machinist/programmer, its awesome seeing the manufacturing footage. Nice work digging that up!

  • @Doug.the.welder-hj6cq
    @Doug.the.welder-hj6cq Місяць тому

    Some of these weapons are so terrifying it's hard to believe they even exist.

  • @jonathanfairchild
    @jonathanfairchild Місяць тому

    It’s kind of crazy that our most impressive feats of ingenuity and collaboration are in weapons of war. Doesn’t detract from the sheer impressiveness just makes it a bit sobering.

  • @chaosXP3RT
    @chaosXP3RT Рік тому +67

    Wow, this was fascinating! It's crazy how much effort went into trying to solve an issue in such a short time frame!

    • @markingraham4892
      @markingraham4892 Рік тому

      It's a idiotic video.

    • @FharishAhmedPortfolio
      @FharishAhmedPortfolio Рік тому +3

      LoL When there's Petroleum at stake... USA can do wonders!!! LoL

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 Рік тому

      I'm honestly more amazed at the tools and methods used to make the conversion. I doubt many other countries have the means to do what is shown in the video even if they came up with the same idea and had these guns laying around.

    • @PGHammer21A
      @PGHammer21A Рік тому

      It is another example why engineering is a necessary skill - even, if not especially, in wartime. Fun fact - did you know that the Army Engineering School STILL teaches the design and use of trebuchets and other ancient siege weapons - the ancestors of artillery? (I knew they taught it at Fort Belvoir - which was the original home of the Enginering School - they kept the course when they moved to Fort Leonard Wood.)

    • @ag3336
      @ag3336 Рік тому +1

      @@FharishAhmedPortfolio facts

  • @voss1617
    @voss1617 Рік тому +82

    Did the bomb continue to be used or developed after it’s initial use or was it just a one off design?

    • @NotWhatYouThink
      @NotWhatYouThink  Рік тому +82

      They continued making GBU-28 bombs (not from Howitzer barrels), and of course, other bunker buster bombs were developed after.

    • @DtWolfwood
      @DtWolfwood Рік тому +11

      Aren't the current bunker busters also fitted for thermobarics?

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 Рік тому +9

      Bro ever hear of desert storm?Thst was just the test range… They make these fucking rain on assholes, they work great on caves as well.

    • @fewetoo4962
      @fewetoo4962 Рік тому +7

      @@DtWolfwood Thermobarics (FAE), like other blast boms, use thin cases to increase the ratio of explosive weight. Penetrators use thick walled cases to improve penetration and increase density to improve kenetic penetration.

    • @thegeneralist7527
      @thegeneralist7527 Рік тому +6

      I'm pretty sure if Uncle Sam knows where you are he can reach out and touch you whenever he wants.

  • @Fester_
    @Fester_ Рік тому

    Very cool. A 250 page book told in 9 minutes. Excellent job - thanks.

  • @Maefdul
    @Maefdul 8 місяців тому

    Min: 1:40 this whole concrete structure is just 1.8meters long?

  • @EverythingYouNeedToKnowEYN2K
    @EverythingYouNeedToKnowEYN2K Рік тому +27

    20 years ago I remember reading an article showing that smooth bullet head missiles have further penetration than pointy missile heads. The article stated the pressure wave ahead created by the smooth missile done much of the 'digging.

    • @iambeloved496
      @iambeloved496 Рік тому

      Wow that's interesting I never thought about that. Thanks for sharing

    • @Chris-jw8vm
      @Chris-jw8vm Рік тому +1

      Might also be that the pointed missiles have more surface area to create friction.

  • @SweBeach2023
    @SweBeach2023 Рік тому +22

    I guess this says a lot about the difference between engineers doing engineering "freestyle" and engineers working in tandem with accountants and bureaucrats. Most engineering is rather simple, doing it in a cost-effective way is far harder.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez Рік тому

      If you're doing engineering most all projects have a budget for the design. Even research projects have a budget. You have to do the work within the allowable budget unless it's a government cost-plus - but those normally have a "not to exceed" figure. I've never worked on a project where anyone did "freestyle" whatever that is, as you always had an engineering budget for each phase of the project. I've also never met an account that had a clue what we did, much less be able to create a design fee estimate.

    • @eriktempelman2097
      @eriktempelman2097 Рік тому

      True. It also gets way easier if you do not need to prevent getting sued.

  • @user-td3bk1sd4u
    @user-td3bk1sd4u 2 місяці тому

    I made these shells a few years ago, they're tough as hell to make

  • @danieln6700
    @danieln6700 11 місяців тому +1

    Very interesting. Had no idea they used those barrels to help make them.

  • @Bhatt_Hole
    @Bhatt_Hole Рік тому +10

    4:27 That's some next-level hair!

  • @lj6284
    @lj6284 Рік тому +137

    Those people at Lockheed and the other companies who helped make this possible were just as responsible for the US’s effectiveness in Iraq as the soldiers and commanders. Amazing

    • @ZT-vr4wz
      @ZT-vr4wz Рік тому +26

      And second time around the people at Lockheed and other companies were just as responsible for war crimes as much as the soldiers and leaders were. Amazing 👏

    • @georgehugh3455
      @georgehugh3455 Рік тому +2

      Says the guy who didn't fight there....

    • @isaiahc8390
      @isaiahc8390 Рік тому

      This world is rapidly passing away and I hope that you repent and take time to change before all out disaster occurs! Belief in messiah alone is not enough to grant you salvation - Matthew 7:21-23, John 3:3, John 3:36 (ESV is the best translation for John 3:36) if you believed in Messiah you would be following His commands as best as you could. If you are not a follower of Messiah I would highly recommend becoming one. Call on the name of Jesus and pray for Him to intervene in your life - Revelation 3:20.
      Contemplate how the Roman Empire fulfilled the role of the beast from the sea in Revelation 13. Revelation 17 confirms that it is in fact Rome. From this we can conclude that A) Jesus is the Son of God and can predict the future or make it happen, B) The world leaders/nations/governments etc have been conspiring together for the last 3000+ years going back to Babylon and before, C) History as we know it is fake. You don't really need to speculate once you start a relationship with God.
      Can't get a response from God? Fasting can help increase your perception and prayer can help initiate events. God will ignore you if your prayer does not align with His purpose (James 4:3) or if you are approaching Him when "unclean" (Isaiah 1:15, Isaiah 59:2, Micah 3:4). Stop eating food sacrificed to idols (McDonald's, Wendy's etc) stop glorifying yourself on social media or making other images of yourself (Second Commandment), stop gossiping about other people, stop watching obscene content etc. Have a blessed day!

    • @lj6284
      @lj6284 Рік тому +1

      @@ZT-vr4wz can’t find where i asked

    • @Zac0827
      @Zac0827 Рік тому

      Yeah. Bomb other countries away. Liberate as you want. Karma awaits. 👍🏽

  • @SpartanONegative
    @SpartanONegative Рік тому

    Warms my heart 🏴‍☠️

  • @ionhunter
    @ionhunter 9 місяців тому

    It was a janitor that suggested using a cannon barrel.