The genius of Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel De Homem Christo. Unbelievably people find out they sample and feel less of them, when in reality.. this is just mind blowing. The pure talent and creativity to be able to find these tiny segments of forgotten songs and turn them into what they have, just unreal.
Of course having high skills is very respectable but the most important in music and arts in general is the emotion you feel and want convey, which is not given to anyone… All their songs are made sampling, and they're all worldwide hits which makes Daft Punk some of the greatest artists _Around The World_ and people not ok with sampling would say they're "purists" but if their music is better with their technique then why won't they share it or why aren't they famous yet ?
Shows how genius they are. I knew they used samples from the begining, and that didn't stop me from loving them. It takes alot of (musical) imagination, creativity, and a good ear. They're work is so clean that you can barely hear the sample they used :o
This is incredible, Daft Punk gave credit to all of the samples they used on the back of the physical releases, but they didn't give one for High Life. This is undeniably real!
Did Daft Punk just get a bunch of old random flops (not that I think they're bad, mind you) and told themselves "Alright. Turn it into something brand new. Make it work."
Thomas' father is somewhat involved in the french music industry and owns a lot of royalties to some songs. So Thomas also gains these royalties and used them as samples
4:15 - 4:56 A combo of this with the original song at the beginning, and high life played slow , then just the baseline, like that is just amazing and it sounds perfect. I’d love to hear a remix of all that combined. I keep watching this video just to hear that few seconds.
*genius. Learn how to spell, dipshit. I hope that in the past 7 years your grammar has improved. Why the fuck would you mess it up in the first place eh? Holy crap get a brain, kid.
@@PlatinumEagleStudios *Genius. Learn how to capitalize, dipshit. I hope that in the past 24 hours your grammar has improved. Why the fuck would you mess it up in the first place, eh? Holy crap. Get a brain, kid.
Man The fact about High life sample was discovered just 11 years ago and Still found new samples (a girl found The da funk's hit sample: ua-cam.com/video/lDj5Ax8sVE0/v-deo.html) Keeps me thinking about how many years Will be passed until a new sample found out
Thank you for all this "investigative" work! It means a lot! I kinda feel I've lost a lot of love ever since I found out they didnt want to credit back the songs they sampled...not sure what that's about.
NemesisAnother Some songs aren't credited in case of "interpolation", i.e. when you can't receive a sample clearance from original publisher, a trivial (non-copyrightable) number of notes or sounds were re-created all anew and that was used as a substitute. While it would be ethical to cite sources of inspiration, that would open them up to a potential lawsuit, which is why "interpolation" sources are no longer ever credited by anybody. It's also possible that no "interpolation" took place but actual sampling, however clearance couldn't be obtained (rights owner couldn't be found or has refused) and thus no credit, so they can claim "interpolation" has taken place. Where sample clearance took place, the original creators are credited, as required. That's the crazy world we live in today where crediting isn't driven by ethics, but by law which was intended well, but evolved into a monstrosity.
Thank you for your 11 year old video upload. A fantastic snapshot into Daft Punk’s skills, love that I’ve discovered this in 2021. Unfortunately we heard some recent news regarding Daft Punk, but the robots will live on in our hearts ♥️
Sampling really shouldn't be frowned upon as long as you be as creative as possible...and I think you are being most creative when people can't tell what you are sampling
@@LOLquendoTV this is from 11 years ago. What I meant from my comment is I wish this content was still being made. It's kinda overproduced and underinformed nowadays imo
@@xX_dash_Xx i disagree, I think there is still quality content like this on the site today, doesnt always get that many views of course but its definitely out there
@@LOLquendoTV im not disagreeing with you, I think there is still quality content produced today, but mostly not in the same manner. This guy just seems so genuine and is just sharing what he is passionate about. Everything has to be monetized now, I feel
I watch this and think Daft punk did it so easy, but then I remember the way the sample is so special and holds a place in my childhood and to recreate is insulting, except in videos like this because they do it for the knowledge, and its fun solving Daft punk mysteries, that is why we watch these videos.
Daft Punk may sample a lot, but they make the songs better then they actually are. Don't say anything unless you know you're going to be bashed for it.
it may be hard to believe, but I think the reason they didn't credit it, was because they actually re-created the sample for use on their album. They probably went through this process till they found the samples...and then re-created it. to match identically. You can tell the version on discovery just sounds so much better than the original studio recording fidelity/stereo spread.
You're quite RIGHT! it's awesome how Daft Punk creates NEW bass lines from chopping songs! I had already noticed that in "one more time"! GREAT VIDEO DUDE!
Hey there are THOUSANDS of bedroom producers out there who WISH they could cut stuff up as well as these particular masters can. Easy to do? hmm mechanically, yeah. It's the vision that makes it brilliant!
I don't think you need to give credit for such short samples. Normally it should be at least 4/4 long, if it's shorter there is no need to point it out. These sample are not even consecutive, but they are built to create a longer sample for the loop, so, there is definitely not need to give credit to that.
PoIsOnDiVx well, actually, copyright doesn't care about sample length. If the original authors can identify it, they can sue them if the artist couldn't get an agreement and permission. Thankfully, Bangalter's dad had a hand in French music, so his son could just abuse the music.
I think discovering the original source is pure talent. I wouldn't have figured out even if I listening to this song 10 times. Props to you and everyone involved in this discovery.
This video shows what devides true artists/musicians from those stupid, no-brain, moneymaking people these days that dare to call themselves artists. Daft Punk takes 4, very little samples from a song, puts them together so they become a small bit of music, and then manages to make an entire song out of it! It may sound simple to some people, but it isn't. It requires skills. What today's artists do: Take an original song, copy the melody, put some rap/hip hop vocals in it and suck up the money.
That is Fire! God how did this ibanz guy find that?! That's sampling I respect. They pulled short clips from 3 places to make 1 loop. From experience, not hard, but not ez... Cool uploads Mr. brainsredd, try Fl Studio's *Slicex*/Edison Editor to chop ur samples n plenty more. Mix Meister is nothing compared to it. U should love it. However I'm not sure you can as technical with it. But you probably can n I never bothered.
You became some kind of legend on UA-cam because of all your Deconstructions. Seriously, You should make more. I enjoy them so much, and I'm sure plenty of others also do. Still, This sample was discovered a few months ago, but it still shivers my spine when I hear it ;D
Depends how much you sample, Modjo's lady takes an entire song, adds a little bass to it, gives it new lyrics, call it original material. Bullshit, regardless of how good the song sounds. Daft punk take bits and pieces and rearrange them entirely most of the time, it's a different level of dificulty, and a different level of recognition you get for the hard work you put in.
Listen, of course they contact the artists or the producers of the original song and ask for permission to use samples of their songs. People think that artists "steal" each other's songs whereas they don't. You wouldn't be able to get away with something like that and would get sued in a couple of days.
I know I'm spamming comments now but I guess it must just come from messing around with record decks. You have all these old LPs and you just mess around scratching with them and stuff comes out. I love the mystery lost in the mists of time. =)
just so u know when u meet daft punk, guy is pronounced "gee" with a hard "G" sound (like the g in "goat" rather than the g in "George.") its french, i just dont want you to insult them when you meet them, because i know you will :P
Very creative! Not as impressive as the original band, whose members probably each had over 10,000 hours of personal practice, perfecting their craft, then assembling to create something larger than each of them as individuals. But still... Daft punk made so many creative tracks with other peoples' works as ingredients.
They're DJ's before they're producers. They take things that they hear and like and put their on spin on it. It makes perfect sense considering that they're DJ's. Consider these songs just really elaborate remixes...
there is a smudge on your camera lens - by your right eye (our left). i thought it was dirt on my screen and started wiping, but it wouldn't go away. i was going crazy until i scrolled down, and it moved!
![Daft Punk's "Discovery": the Samples [2023 EDITION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/11pK_yZNuQ4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Daft Punk's "Discovery": the Samples [2023 EDITION]](/img/tr.png)
“This isn’t perfect...”
*perfectly recreates the song*
no
*yes*
no
Maybe
Who knows
almost cried watching this video. it's the purest essence of 2010s youtube.
Exactly. I felt emotional watching this video idk why
same here
Reject 20s UA-cam embrace 10s UA-cam
This is closer to actual 2010 and the 00s tbh. Old video.
@@Nicotine46 more peaceful - youtube is basically all corp, ads and influencers (then there's the actual good stuff crammed in between)
The genius of Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel De Homem Christo. Unbelievably people find out they sample and feel less of them, when in reality.. this is just mind blowing. The pure talent and creativity to be able to find these tiny segments of forgotten songs and turn them into what they have, just unreal.
Agreed, it is pure genius
If you can create songs that sound as good, if not better, than their original, then that is 🤌
The prodigy have also been doing things like this for almost 3 years longer than daft punk and they are amazing at it too
Of course having high skills is very respectable but the most important in music and arts in general is the emotion you feel and want convey, which is not given to anyone… All their songs are made sampling, and they're all worldwide hits which makes Daft Punk some of the greatest artists _Around The World_ and people not ok with sampling would say they're "purists" but if their music is better with their technique then why won't they share it or why aren't they famous yet ?
@@DerAchte8 Or as I like to put it when I produce music, "if it works it works"
Shows how genius they are. I knew they used samples from the begining, and that didn't stop me from loving them. It takes alot of (musical) imagination, creativity, and a good ear. They're work is so clean that you can barely hear the sample they used :o
Thank you for putting this out.
Seriously.
Yup
robot rock
Robot Rock is obvious as hell
That's quite a DISCOVERY *Step step, clap*
**stomp, stomp, clap**
we will.... we will.... rock-
wrong stuff
Fucking hell, Daft Punk are talented as fuck....they have a really good ear for music.
Sir, you’re.. Gonna wanna sit down..
@@guillaume774 hahahaha
Enjoy the resurgence of this video man!
Aaaaaaye
Far from perfect? LOL, it's bassically the same result!! Just some hi-pass filtering and you got the intro as it is! Awesome.
This is incredible, Daft Punk gave credit to all of the samples they used on the back of the physical releases, but they didn't give one for High Life. This is undeniably real!
+TrippinDrago They also didn't credit Aerodynamic
@AuralFiendOfficial They have to deny them or they will pay through the nose
@AuralFiendOfficial haven’t read the interview where they denied the samples in a while but if i remember correctly it was them talking about voyager.
If you DJ at a place, you should play the song sampled in High Life and then go into Daft Punk's version with the way you did it.
Tyrant Gaming I would kill to be there to hear that
Instant fireworks !
I will :)
Did Daft Punk just get a bunch of old random flops (not that I think they're bad, mind you) and told themselves "Alright. Turn it into something brand new. Make it work."
Thomas' father is somewhat involved in the french music industry and owns a lot of royalties to some songs. So Thomas also gains these royalties and used them as samples
@ yeah Thomas Bangalters father
yo that recreation at the slower pitch was dope
Holy smack! When it takes 9 years for the world to find out what you sampled, you know you´ve made a good job. Thomas and Guy-Man in my heart forever.
Sampling is so cool.....
Wow! What a discovery!
is that a pun?
iBalls yes i think it is
Niko Koloseus I think the album name is just this in reverse
+Thekinggamelon One of their worst albums.
and it's very disco! ^^
4:15 - 4:56 A combo of this with the original song at the beginning, and high life played slow , then just the baseline, like that is just amazing and it sounds perfect. I’d love to hear a remix of all that combined. I keep watching this video just to hear that few seconds.
Same for me
After 11 years this is still gold
Amen
Your face is still gold.
This is why Daft Punk are sample Geniuses !!!
Incredible to get this recommended and see all the topcomments as being 5, 6, 7 years old... I will leave them ignorant of the news
you are a genious!! :)
*genius. Learn how to spell, dipshit. I hope that in the past 7 years your grammar has improved. Why the fuck would you mess it up in the first place eh? Holy crap get a brain, kid.
@@PlatinumEagleStudios jesus christ it’s just a spelling error
@@PlatinumEagleStudios *Genius. Learn how to capitalize, dipshit. I hope that in the past 24 hours your grammar has improved. Why the fuck would you mess it up in the first place, eh? Holy crap. Get a brain, kid.
@@PlatinumEagleStudios woah, calm down, he’s not a native speaker
@@PlatinumEagleStudios shut the fuck up.
Man
The fact about High life sample was discovered just 11 years ago and Still found new samples (a girl found The da funk's hit sample: ua-cam.com/video/lDj5Ax8sVE0/v-deo.html)
Keeps me thinking about how many years Will be passed until a new sample found out
How the fuck did they ever had the idea of picking 4 small pieces of one obscure song and create a whole new song based on that? This is awesome stuff
UA-cam recommendation back at it again!
“I gotta check out this Ableton thing at NAMM” lmao
Hey there, algorithm! Thank you for showing me this.
Thank you for all this "investigative" work! It means a lot! I kinda feel I've lost a lot of love ever since I found out they didnt want to credit back the songs they sampled...not sure what that's about.
One song only because it was given to Thomas by his father as he was a music producer
NemesisAnother Some songs aren't credited in case of "interpolation", i.e. when you can't receive a sample clearance from original publisher, a trivial (non-copyrightable) number of notes or sounds were re-created all anew and that was used as a substitute. While it would be ethical to cite sources of inspiration, that would open them up to a potential lawsuit, which is why "interpolation" sources are no longer ever credited by anybody.
It's also possible that no "interpolation" took place but actual sampling, however clearance couldn't be obtained (rights owner couldn't be found or has refused) and thus no credit, so they can claim "interpolation" has taken place.
Where sample clearance took place, the original creators are credited, as required.
That's the crazy world we live in today where crediting isn't driven by ethics, but by law which was intended well, but evolved into a monstrosity.
This video older than DMCA
It's been loads of fun trying to figure this stuff out :) These boys are brilliant!
this is just magic, music magic
...Holy crap... THAT IS AMAZING!!!
***** Indeed... They are geniuess!!
peter griffin voice
all this time I thought it was "2 ladies singing HOOP BEEP BUNG" and I literally tried to search for the full song to no avail
Wow that small portion... Made an entire song D: see that's talent
HOLY SHIT IT sounded exactly like it when you changed the pitch! That's freaking awesome!!!
Thank you for your 11 year old video upload. A fantastic snapshot into Daft Punk’s skills, love that I’ve discovered this in 2021. Unfortunately we heard some recent news regarding Daft Punk, but the robots will live on in our hearts ♥️
i'm very happy to be french i like daft punk
How you feel about Les Rythme Digitales. They are extremely french.
Hold on, wait a minute.. HA! Yeah I DO hear it now. Never heard that before... HA!
GREAT spotting!
Haha still relevant in 2021. Nice work everyone who worked on this!
Sampling really shouldn't be frowned upon as long as you be as creative as possible...and I think you are being most creative when people can't tell what you are sampling
Why is everyone commenting 11 years later
You must not have heard the news when you made this comment..
Someone watching this video on 2021?
imagine a timeline where this youtube content still extisted
it does? you are literally commenting on it?!
@@LOLquendoTV this is from 11 years ago. What I meant from my comment is I wish this content was still being made. It's kinda overproduced and underinformed nowadays imo
@@xX_dash_Xx i disagree, I think there is still quality content like this on the site today, doesnt always get that many views of course but its definitely out there
@@LOLquendoTV im not disagreeing with you, I think there is still quality content produced today, but mostly not in the same manner. This guy just seems so genuine and is just sharing what he is passionate about. Everything has to be monetized now, I feel
@@xX_dash_Xx fair enough, i wont disagree on that, inevitable really, once a hobby became a profession for many
I watch this and think Daft punk did it so easy, but then I remember the way the sample is so special and holds a place in my childhood and to recreate is insulting, except in videos like this because they do it for the knowledge, and its fun solving Daft punk mysteries, that is why we watch these videos.
4:37 that is exactly what J Dilla did, you are a genius!!! You definitely know your music!
this is actually amazing
Hey, algorithm
Everybody should thank Love & Mind (Pecherecords) for finding this.
Daft Punk may sample a lot, but they make the songs better then they actually are. Don't say anything unless you know you're going to be bashed for it.
it may be hard to believe, but I think the reason they didn't credit it, was because they actually re-created the sample for use on their album. They probably went through this process till they found the samples...and then re-created it. to match identically. You can tell the version on discovery just sounds so much better than the original studio recording fidelity/stereo spread.
+Anthony grant Your probably right, a lot of bands nowadays do this in order to avoid legal complications.
Anthony grant Or maybe because they just used micro samples so they don't needed to credit Tavares .
The second bass beat is a major second high, but otherwise, excellent sleuthing!
wonder why you keep saying this isn’t perfect… from this then we can sing the lyrics as “survive.. strong…"
Nice to see im the first one to have it in the recomendations...
Fuck sake how you know ...mate datf punk high live is the best song for me
What software r u using for this, also, I think there is another sample in the song at "we're just people *bein'* people"
lol 13 years later and we found the last high life sample
The title is the video is a pun, because of the album name that this song is on
You're quite RIGHT! it's awesome how Daft Punk creates NEW bass lines from chopping songs! I had already noticed that in "one more time"!
GREAT VIDEO DUDE!
11 years afterwards and it is still amazing
i wonder if tavres ever contacted daft punk after this was discovered
nice and creative sample rip. thanks
Hey there are THOUSANDS of bedroom producers out there who WISH they could cut stuff up as well as these particular masters can.
Easy to do? hmm mechanically, yeah. It's the vision that makes it brilliant!
Didn't daft punk give credit to all of their samples on the back of their physical release of the album?
that's what im saying.. read the credits... lol
I don't think you need to give credit for such short samples. Normally it should be at least 4/4 long, if it's shorter there is no need to point it out. These sample are not even consecutive, but they are built to create a longer sample for the loop, so, there is definitely not need to give credit to that.
PoIsOnDiVx well, actually, copyright doesn't care about sample length. If the original authors can identify it, they can sue them if the artist couldn't get an agreement and permission. Thankfully, Bangalter's dad had a hand in French music, so his son could just abuse the music.
rewatching because im not genious
LA People.. I'll be with Chris Big Daddy Andrews in front of the Chinese Theater around 8 PM tonight (1/12/2010) if anyone wants to hook up!
that tip about them 'creating basslines' is really simple but something i'd never actually thought of. damn good video too!
Brilliant. The second sample in the sequence wasn't quite right (the bass from high life hits a 4th, not a 5th) but awesome nonetheless.
I am aware that this isn't perfect, but in the chop, the second sample beat isn't in the song, it's just one simgle note through.
Damn, Thomas and Guy-Man' main talent is to find pure gold and succeed to make it even better!
I think discovering the original source is pure talent. I wouldn't have figured out even if I listening to this song 10 times. Props to you and everyone involved in this discovery.
More samples have been identified as follows:
Fresh - If You Leave Me Now by Viola Wills
Phoenix - Don't Go Breaking My Heart by Elton John
I'm not hating UA-cam for showing me this after 11 years.
Wooaaa
Pretty cool
All this DJ / mixing music stuff seems like an incredibly world of fun and awesomeness !!
Fuck me, that's insane !
Daft Punk were mad creative with their sampling. Thank God for them.
damn this is from 2010
This sample stands for the "yang" when robot rock stands for the "ying" in terms of creativity
ying is actually the bad part, high life is supposed to be yang
@@edrollagigraioe3391 thx
HIGH LIFE IS SO UNDERRATED. Bro I can’t believe all these songs are resurfacing
Very cool! Thanks for sharing.
I really like that you added the part about them creating basslines. Thats ingenious, thanks for the insight!
This video shows what devides true artists/musicians from those stupid, no-brain, moneymaking people these days that dare to call themselves artists.
Daft Punk takes 4, very little samples from a song, puts them together so they become a small bit of music, and then manages to make an entire song out of it! It may sound simple to some people, but it isn't. It requires skills.
What today's artists do: Take an original song, copy the melody, put some rap/hip hop vocals in it and suck up the money.
Really AMAZING!!! Kisses from spain!! IT IS MY FAVORITE FAVORITE SONG EVER!!
Pure UA-cam right here.
It amazes me the things you can do with music.
Really Amazing!! It is my favorite song ever!!
Holy shit, my mind's blown 10 years later
This is brilliant! I really enjoyed this video, thanks for posting.
WHAT!!!! How the f*** did i find this? 😱. 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿 👨🏾🎤 Discovery indeed.
That is Fire! God how did this ibanz guy find that?! That's sampling I respect. They pulled short clips from 3 places to make 1 loop. From experience, not hard, but not ez... Cool uploads Mr. brainsredd, try Fl Studio's *Slicex*/Edison Editor to chop ur samples n plenty more. Mix Meister is nothing compared to it. U should love it. However I'm not sure you can as technical with it. But you probably can n I never bothered.
You became some kind of legend on UA-cam because of all your Deconstructions. Seriously, You should make more. I enjoy them so much, and I'm sure plenty of others also do.
Still, This sample was discovered a few months ago, but it still shivers my spine when I hear it ;D
Depends how much you sample, Modjo's lady takes an entire song, adds a little bass to it, gives it new lyrics, call it original material. Bullshit, regardless of how good the song sounds.
Daft punk take bits and pieces and rearrange them entirely most of the time, it's a different level of dificulty, and a different level of recognition you get for the hard work you put in.
Listen, of course they contact the artists or the producers of the original song and ask for permission to use samples of their songs. People think that artists "steal" each other's songs whereas they don't. You wouldn't be able to get away with something like that and would get sued in a couple of days.
I know I'm spamming comments now but I guess it must just come from messing around with record decks. You have all these old LPs and you just mess around scratching with them and stuff comes out. I love the mystery lost in the mists of time. =)
just so u know when u meet daft punk, guy is pronounced "gee" with a hard "G" sound (like the g in "goat" rather than the g in "George.")
its french, i just dont want you to insult them when you meet them, because i know you will :P
Very creative! Not as impressive as the original band, whose members probably each had over 10,000 hours of personal practice, perfecting their craft, then assembling to create something larger than each of them as individuals. But still... Daft punk made so many creative tracks with other peoples' works as ingredients.
That's a perfect example. Very true. You should also check out 'Play Hard' by David Guetta. You'll see (hear) what I'm talking about.
Its good i had a go didnt add the be in the end. I got F,Dminor,Aminor. I combined to two titles of the songs called it High Punk.
dont know why daft punk denied that most of their stuff on discovery wasnt sampled it was like they was trying to take all credit.
They're DJ's before they're producers. They take things that they hear and like and put their on spin on it. It makes perfect sense considering that they're DJ's. Consider these songs just really elaborate remixes...
Yeah. How dare they try to evolve and grow as musicians instead of producing the same shit over and over their entire careers.
brian, there's one more sample in the song! The "the beat is sample" don't worry! I decompiled it right here watch?v=00BrTMmbuNs
there is a smudge on your camera lens - by your right eye (our left). i thought it was dirt on my screen and started wiping, but it wouldn't go away. i was going crazy until i scrolled down, and it moved!