I do it intentionally only to discover, I’ve hung my queen at the hands of a different piece, and have no way to take the only other piece attacking mine (the enemy queen I intended to trade my opponent with).
Important lesson: If a play seems too easy stop and consider if you're doing something really stupid. We're most prone to mistakes when we think we're winning.
OK try I understand he kind of fell into the queen gambit trap, but do you actually know which move he messed up on because let me tell you it isn’t taking the bishop
0:13 "The next move is obvious. We can launch an RT-2PM2 Topol-M cold-launched three-stage solid-propellant silo-based intercontinental ballistic missile."
@@samuelallard141 Actually i dont think so, although the way the queen is taken is kinda similar. The "intercontinental ballistic missile gambit" is a variation of the Tennison gambit, while this one is a variation of the Englund Gambit
My man just sacrificed 4 of his men just tear the enemy apart from within. This guy is a savage and someone has to stop him before he grows too powerful.
I played this against people before back when I had a lower chess rating. I feel sad that people started to catch on and not fall for this as I started to climb in rating.
@@highadmiralbittenfield9689 Well... the thing about fools mate is that weaker players won't fall for it because they are too weak to think that moving non center pawn first is an option, then better players won't fall for it because they know this 1 square with pawn is important to protect... so if you are falling for a fools mate you are special, or throwing.
I don't get why people would enjoy winning with these tricks personally. Like I get it's funny but after a few times would it not get boring winning games because of something you memorized rather something you came up with on your own?
@@ivandunnachie1612 The tricks rarely work, instead more often you end up in interesting, quick and tricky positions... and avoid positional games, which for me are boring.
White's only mistake was taking the knight, opening the queen file. Other than that, it's perfectly acceptable to entertain a gambit, or even a double gambit in this case. When white took the knight though, they lost. Down a queen, back rank is compromised, and black has short castle capability while white can't castle at all
@@louiesatterwhite3885 What was the point of sacrificing the knight? Black could've just taken the white pawn with the queen (automatically protected by another pawn)?
@@valinorean4816 that would've opened up a queen trade. Board would still be in blacks favor but not a cut and dry win that hanging the knight allowed. Also, while position would be in black's favor at that point, material would technically be in white's.
@@valinorean4816 hanging the knight lets the bishop force the king to take, as in the video, then blacks queen went into the back rank and could easily take a bishop, pawns, and probably a rook safely. Black wanted white to open the queens file, they didn't want to do it themselves. It would have been best if white didn't play that pawn and just developed other pieces. Hanging the knight made the play a triple gambit.
White: "You fool. You buffoon. You absolute imbecile!" Black: "Bxf2" White: "..." White: "We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled."
@@redstonewarrior0152 yeah, both pawns are aiming at the queen but can’t move back. The bishops can only move side to side, the rooks are blocked by the bishops. and if the queen moves to the left… It’s over
The backline, which contains all the important pieces, has no way to prevent the queen from being one step ahead for a few times. White has to play damage control with a spoon while a fire is ravaging half his flat.
Black kept sacrificing his smaller or medium pieces and White kept taking it, but it was all a setup to take White's most important piece, the Queen, right in her throne.
It's not using the Tennison. England gambit, I think? But it does share the ICBM's goal of baiting the opponent to permit your queen in to a devastating position.
for anyone who's curious thing is actually called the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit Just read the first reply god, I am aware that it's different then the Tennison, it stays the same concept.
the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit is a variation of the Tennison gambit. The one played here is a variation of the Eglund gambit. Both of them are kinda similar at the end, hence the confusion
I just realised on this location, as long as the queen doesnt eliminate the knights, she basically has a full smorgasbord buffet of pieces she can eliminate without being in any danger herself
@@l1ghtd3m0n3 at any point, 1 bishop is dead after this turn, followed by either pawns, or a rook if the knights move The pawns cant move backwards, so they are all easy pickings The only ones that can be protected are pawns directly in the path of the knights two elimination areas, or the knights themselves if they NEVER move The bishops cant attack the queen, the king cant move back, the knights cant attack the queen, and the pawns cant From this position, every piece in that queens path is in danger with no course of action against her
@@MadGameBoy Actually there is an action white can take. Move b1 to a3. This kinda forces black to back off his queen. Because there would be not much to for the queen if he were not to. Can't take any of the diagonal pawns because they are protected by either a knight or a bishop, can't take any of the bishops because they both are protected by a rook, can't check because the knight on f3 is protecting the both e1 and d4 squares. So black has to move the queen to d5 or further back. If he wants to use the queen that is. Or else, white can lock the queen in by moving the knight on f3 to d2. Can't block the way out by using the bishop on c1 because that would leave the rook on a1 unprotected. And it would allow queen to escape by taking some pieces on the right side. Tracing some steps back, not moving the queen and leaving her there would be the best move for black because the queen locks a lot of white's pieces in place just by herself. Both diagonal pawns, both knights, both bishops, the rook on a1. Only thing white can try to do is to open up a way for the rook on h1 but that would take some moves. So, maybe just letting the black queen go would be the best option for white. And for black, to keep her there. Essentially, it is better to just leave her alone and ignore her.
@@MadGameBoy If white puts their knight at C3, all bishops are protected, as are the knights. The black queen can capture the pawn @ c2 and nothing more.
Extra Tip: When using this exact tactic, if the pawn on E2 moves, do not capture the bishop at C1, you would lose your queen to Bishop to B5 check (Bb5+), a check on the king and a discovered attack on your queen.
Brilliant moves dont mean much anymore. Just if you sac a piece and its a good move its called brilliant. Before an update brilliant moves were avtually hard to find.
I wouldve though bishop f2+ was a book move. It literally wins a queen back after 1 move, and the whole purpose behind giving up the knight is to win the queen.
actually some nerd with engine invented how to salvage it from state after black takes queen into sharp but equal position. going into this line is suboptimal, but not losing.
@@Alphabetatralala ur question is right. it's not equalised with proper play. there is eric rosen video "the coolest trap you should never try" i had to recheck this
@@gamerdio2503 the only time you are losing something important is when they kill the horse But if you agreed to sacrifice the horse it means everything is setup right. Once they kill the horse, there is no coming back from that. It's a sure shot death of their queen. And if everything was not setup right, you can just kill that pawn
@@HarshRajAlwaysfree Taking the horse loses the queen, but nobody who knows what they're doing will take the queen. The position is +2.4 in favor of white according to the lichess engine. This is objectively bad.
@@gamerdio2503 I will still do it. If succeeded the mental trauma of losing queen for normal humans is quite high. I can quickly use that rush for more consecutive attacks or just fall back I am willing to sacrifice a horse and a bishop for a good laugh and enemy's queen is just bonus for me.
Who else thought black was an absolute beginner but realised they had a smart tactic? Edit: Ive noticed from the replies many people have seen this variation of the Englund Gambit and say Im noob - which is true. I can partly remember some sort of line like this but not exactly. Tease as much as you want on my chess knowledge
Not really since if white only nom noms the first 2 pawns and notices the tactic and plays a preventative move he's actually better. Thats The issue with this trap in the englund gambit
@@gabeop9615 I did this tactic many times but I always lose except one when my enemy surrendered seeing their queen die. I dont know maybe Im just so n00b that my enemy defeats me without a queen.
@@gabeop9615 That plus the fact that stockfish rates it around -3 for black after dxe7; black is only up a minor piece in material count if the gambit goes perfectly, which is not exactly crushing especially at lower levels
Actually had a game like this, where I was playing as white. Should have realised that this was a trap sooner. However, I still managed to win by resignation, after taking black's queen, leaving the game in an endgame where I was up 2 rooks. This is a message to anyone starting out in chess and those that are still at a low ELO rating: Don't give up just because your queen has been captured. She is powerful, but she is still only one of many pieces on the board.
I mean its not completely unwinnable anyhow even if you fall for it, as long as white knights into A3 immediatly after the queen cant really take anything else there and has to back off (or it will get trapped).
The incomprihensable horror made of tentacles and shapes beyond our three dimensions seemingly sneers in what looks to be contempt "how do you plan to win by feeding me all your pieces?" It continues, looking up at the cigar smoking man with glee, or prehaps disapointment, maybe anger, or maybe just holding a poker face... "I thought you were suppoused to be a strategic genius" The man calmly looks at the board, then back at the, now more feathery than tenticaled, thing. He then reaches down to a single piece on the board. The bird thing regaly, or maybe calmly, pregaps fearfuly, but at the very least slowly, glances down and then back to the man, then it quickly shifts back to staring at the board "wha-! when did that queen get ther-!?" A screech ripples through the immaterium and into reality through the eye of terror transported through vacuums and bastions alike. *"CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!"*
@@sudanemamimikiki1527 what would be the best move for white afterwards? Bishop to G2 to defend the pawn? Move the G pawn and then the white bishop to free the rook? Maybe just take the L and move Knight to C3?
on the topic of "nom noms"; for some reason, in Indonesian chess terminology: you don't "capture" (tangkap) chess pieces, you "eat" (makan) them instead. But some people also call the "bishop" piece, the "rocket" piece instead so what do I know.
@@Bruh-bk6yo is Kc3 not also a good move? I’m a little new to chess but that seems like a good opportunity for white to make a fork on the king and rook if black gets too hungry for pawns
@@cameronw253 seems like a good move because it attacks the queen. But the reason it worse than Na3 is because your pawn at c2 is not protected. At this position each pawn is expensive for you.
Now you're opponent is 9 points down and you have better positioning and can still castle. I may not be a chess player currently, but I remember some old tricks.
@@bitnn4703 When did i say any rook checks the king? White bishop checks the black king, once white bishop moves that also clears the path for the rook to take the queen
"Why did my Queen turn black?!"
The real question is "Where is my black queen?"
@@mamamiqael went and seduced the enemy queen.
Once you go Black you will never turn Back
pokimane fans when she did curly hair
Michael Jackson
Don't you hate it when you play chess and your queen does a reverse michael jackson?
She got revitaligo. Its the opposite of what michael jackson had.
I do it intentionally only to discover, I’ve hung my queen at the hands of a different piece, and have no way to take the only other piece attacking mine (the enemy queen I intended to trade my opponent with).
A reverse Michael Jackson is called an Uncle Ruckus.
Yeeeehheee
Bro i saw this comment after i commented something saying "reverse Michael Jackson" i swear i didnt steal the idea lol
Important lesson: If a play seems too easy stop and consider if you're doing something really stupid. We're most prone to mistakes when we think we're winning.
Thanks, dad🥱😫 Just wanted to enjoy a video without nagging, DaaaaaaaD😤😤
instructions unclear, got stuck into an eternal indecisiveness loop where i don't make any move at all
OK try I understand he kind of fell into the queen gambit trap, but do you actually know which move he messed up on because let me tell you it isn’t taking the bishop
@@empireyouth5791 I'm by no means a chess master so I maybe wrong but personally I think he messed up when he took the knight with his pawn
"Do not interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake."
-Sun Tzu
The movement is physical, but the damages, are psychological.
Emotional damage(s)!
The symptoms are also physical
100%
"That's a lot of DAMAGE"
Nice opening, white, one small issue... I am in your walls.
Ah a joke my friends always use and it always make me laugh
Like attack on titan nice swords you got there I see your walls are impenetrable nice defense AND offense? Wow but the thing is... I'm in your walls😎
Nice opening. One small issue. I am inside your home
My reaction to that information
I'm sick and tired of walls
0:13 "The next move is obvious. We can launch an RT-2PM2 Topol-M cold-launched three-stage solid-propellant silo-based intercontinental ballistic missile."
You forgor a cherry on top, a grenade.
Isnt the gambit name intercontinental ballistic missile
@@samuelallard141 Actually i dont think so, although the way the queen is taken is kinda similar. The "intercontinental ballistic missile gambit" is a variation of the Tennison gambit, while this one is a variation of the Englund Gambit
Different execution, but the same general idea.
@@samuelallard141 Same idea, but the ICBMTennisson is used by white against the Scandinavian
My man just sacrificed 4 of his men just tear the enemy apart from within. This guy is a savage and someone has to stop him before he grows too powerful.
I played this against people before back when I had a lower chess rating. I feel sad that people started to catch on and not fall for this as I started to climb in rating.
I learned this pitfall the hard way when I played with my dad, I was 10 at the time. I lost our bet and had to do the dishes for a month...never again
It's kind of like the fools mate in that nobody ever falls for it twice unless they are... Special.
@@highadmiralbittenfield9689 Well... the thing about fools mate is that weaker players won't fall for it because they are too weak to think that moving non center pawn first is an option, then better players won't fall for it because they know this 1 square with pawn is important to protect... so if you are falling for a fools mate you are special, or throwing.
I don't get why people would enjoy winning with these tricks personally. Like I get it's funny but after a few times would it not get boring winning games because of something you memorized rather something you came up with on your own?
@@ivandunnachie1612 The tricks rarely work, instead more often you end up in interesting, quick and tricky positions... and avoid positional games, which for me are boring.
That is why you should always think ten times before capturing too early in game.
White's only mistake was taking the knight, opening the queen file. Other than that, it's perfectly acceptable to entertain a gambit, or even a double gambit in this case. When white took the knight though, they lost. Down a queen, back rank is compromised, and black has short castle capability while white can't castle at all
@@louiesatterwhite3885 What was the point of sacrificing the knight? Black could've just taken the white pawn with the queen (automatically protected by another pawn)?
@@valinorean4816 that would've opened up a queen trade. Board would still be in blacks favor but not a cut and dry win that hanging the knight allowed. Also, while position would be in black's favor at that point, material would technically be in white's.
@@louiesatterwhite3885 but hanging a knight also opens up the white just.. not taking the knight? whereas the queen trade is now forced
@@valinorean4816 hanging the knight lets the bishop force the king to take, as in the video, then blacks queen went into the back rank and could easily take a bishop, pawns, and probably a rook safely. Black wanted white to open the queens file, they didn't want to do it themselves. It would have been best if white didn't play that pawn and just developed other pieces. Hanging the knight made the play a triple gambit.
White: "You fool. You buffoon. You absolute imbecile!"
Black: "Bxf2"
White: "..."
White: "We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled."
What words!
sarge?
What's even better is how whute cannot take black's queen
@@redstonewarrior0152 yeah, both pawns are aiming at the queen but can’t move back. The bishops can only move side to side, the rooks are blocked by the bishops. and if the queen moves to the left…
It’s over
@@alensday2974 if black would move his queen from e1 to d1 either the king or the horse would take blacks queen lol
Me, who is not a chess player:
"Mmm yes of course we'll played."
The backline, which contains all the important pieces, has no way to prevent the queen from being one step ahead for a few times. White has to play damage control with a spoon while a fire is ravaging half his flat.
@@Blagno4 I don't know how you did it, but you made it make legit sense in my head. Thank you stranger!
well* not we'll we'll means we will so your comment is saying "Mmm yes of course we will played." well means good or nice
Black kept sacrificing his smaller or medium pieces and White kept taking it, but it was all a setup to take White's most important piece, the Queen, right in her throne.
Is we'll a typo? First time i have seen someone make that mistake.
The "I should have seen that coming. How could I be so stupid" Gambit.
you know you're in for it when Mozart starts playing
Lacrimosa
the piece fits so well with these moves
It gets even more dramatic with the sad Pingu face.
Thank you I love the song
well, but the yoshi's island tune was so random
Ah yes, the "Tennison Gambit: Intercontinental Ballistic Missle Variation"
That's the Englund Gambit though
Tennison gambit is from the Scandy, and is played with white
@@ShogunFRIEND ua-cam.com/video/E2xNlzsnPCQ/v-deo.html
Englund Gambit TSAR BOMBA 50 Megaton Atomic bomb launched from an ICBM variant
It's not using the Tennison. England gambit, I think? But it does share the ICBM's goal of baiting the opponent to permit your queen in to a devastating position.
The best way to win, is to make your opponent think they're in control. Then they fail to notice what you're planning behind the scenes
I would’ve been too scared to fall for this gambit (rightfully so).
I love how the camera zooms in. Reminds me of players getting tunnel vision.
It's so real tho
I w0uld definitely put my eyeball right on the screen
gothamchess
for anyone who's curious thing is actually called the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit
Just read the first reply god, I am aware that it's different then the Tennison, it stays the same concept.
Yea but in the england, not the scandi
Wasn't it the tenison Gambit?
@@NxVernxual its the variation of the tennison gambit
No it isn't its the eglund gambit
the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit is a variation of the Tennison gambit. The one played here is a variation of the Eglund gambit. Both of them are kinda similar at the end, hence the confusion
Playing chess is sometimes the most satisfying thing ever...
Until it happens to you
I just realised on this location, as long as the queen doesnt eliminate the knights, she basically has a full smorgasbord buffet of pieces she can eliminate without being in any danger herself
Well, not really. Several pieces are covered by other pieces.
@@l1ghtd3m0n3 at any point, 1 bishop is dead after this turn, followed by either pawns, or a rook if the knights move
The pawns cant move backwards, so they are all easy pickings
The only ones that can be protected are pawns directly in the path of the knights two elimination areas, or the knights themselves if they NEVER move
The bishops cant attack the queen, the king cant move back, the knights cant attack the queen, and the pawns cant
From this position, every piece in that queens path is in danger with no course of action against her
@@MadGameBoy Actually there is an action white can take. Move b1 to a3. This kinda forces black to back off his queen. Because there would be not much to for the queen if he were not to. Can't take any of the diagonal pawns because they are protected by either a knight or a bishop, can't take any of the bishops because they both are protected by a rook, can't check because the knight on f3 is protecting the both e1 and d4 squares. So black has to move the queen to d5 or further back. If he wants to use the queen that is. Or else, white can lock the queen in by moving the knight on f3 to d2. Can't block the way out by using the bishop on c1 because that would leave the rook on a1 unprotected. And it would allow queen to escape by taking some pieces on the right side. Tracing some steps back, not moving the queen and leaving her there would be the best move for black because the queen locks a lot of white's pieces in place just by herself. Both diagonal pawns, both knights, both bishops, the rook on a1. Only thing white can try to do is to open up a way for the rook on h1 but that would take some moves. So, maybe just letting the black queen go would be the best option for white. And for black, to keep her there. Essentially, it is better to just leave her alone and ignore her.
@@MadGameBoy If white puts their knight at C3, all bishops are protected, as are the knights. The black queen can capture the pawn @ c2 and nothing more.
move the pawn blocking the c1 bishop and your bishops are safe.
If he takes, check the king and you can take the queen
Black's queen: "time to devour you from within"
That's what she said?
ayo wtf
Extra Tip: When using this exact tactic, if the pawn on E2 moves, do not capture the bishop at C1, you would lose your queen to Bishop to B5 check (Bb5+), a check on the king and a discovered attack on your queen.
🤓
@@timmycu 😐
@@timmycu 😐
@@timmycu 😐
@@timmycu 😐
"Do not swallow bait offered by the enemy" -Sun Tzu
I felt that bass drop on a level you couldn't imagine. I'm the player in white on about 75% of my games.
lol I just used this on a -50 under-leveled poor dude and he instant resigned 🤣also stockfish says the bishop f2+ move was brilliant
Brilliant moves dont mean much anymore. Just if you sac a piece and its a good move its called brilliant. Before an update brilliant moves were avtually hard to find.
@@doormatcat Now brilliant moves are dependent on elo so if you're lower rated, it's easier to get brilliant moves
I wouldve though bishop f2+ was a book move. It literally wins a queen back after 1 move, and the whole purpose behind giving up the knight is to win the queen.
no it doesnt lol
@@PandaFan2443 it is 100 percent book move.
actually some nerd with engine invented how to salvage it from state after black takes queen into sharp but equal position. going into this line is suboptimal, but not losing.
What's the line ?
@@Alphabetatralala ur question is right. it's not equalised with proper play. there is eric rosen video "the coolest trap you should never try" i had to recheck this
@@asansfakeaccound5466 Oh okay I'm a bit disappointed but that's to be expected, I'll go watch the vidéo tho. Thanks
yeah, but if you are falling into this, you clearly wouldn't stand a chance without your queen and only normal pieces
There's Big Brain and then there's Suave Brain. This was so clean I barely noticed it until White captured the Black Knight.
Sometimes you need to sacrifice for big things
-The Black General
"You fool! Thunder Cross Queen Attack!"
I tried this on someone and they thought I was stupid in the beginning. When I put Bxf2, they suddenly realized and I saw the horror in their face.
I mean, it is kinda stupid. So long as white doesn't take the knight, they're winning
@@gamerdio2503 the only time you are losing something important is when they kill the horse
But if you agreed to sacrifice the horse it means everything is setup right.
Once they kill the horse, there is no coming back from that. It's a sure shot death of their queen.
And if everything was not setup right, you can just kill that pawn
@@HarshRajAlwaysfree Taking the horse loses the queen, but nobody who knows what they're doing will take the queen. The position is +2.4 in favor of white according to the lichess engine. This is objectively bad.
@@gamerdio2503 I will still do it.
If succeeded the mental trauma of losing queen for normal humans is quite high.
I can quickly use that rush for more consecutive attacks or just fall back
I am willing to sacrifice a horse and a bishop for a good laugh and enemy's queen is just bonus for me.
@@HarshRajAlwaysfree You misunderstand me. If white takes the knight, it's losing for white. What I'm saying is that _nobody will take the knight_
This is know as the "intercontinental ballistic missile"' gambit
I can see my self falling for it and it pains because I know I'll forget it!!!
Chess gambit is obviously shooting your opponent's piece with nuclear warhead to destroy their chances of winning
Who else thought black was an absolute beginner but realised they had a smart tactic?
Edit: Ive noticed from the replies many people have seen this variation of the Englund Gambit and say Im noob - which is true. I can partly remember some sort of line like this but not exactly. Tease as much as you want on my chess knowledge
Not really since if white only nom noms the first 2 pawns and notices the tactic and plays a preventative move he's actually better. Thats The issue with this trap in the englund gambit
@@gabeop9615 I did this tactic many times but I always lose except one when my enemy surrendered seeing their queen die. I dont know maybe Im just so n00b that my enemy defeats me without a queen.
@@catwhowatchesyoutube9601 😂😂😂damn bro what’s your elo
@@bendadickclone7962 Is elo the points thingy? Mine is 976 before now Im 913
@@gabeop9615 That plus the fact that stockfish rates it around -3 for black after dxe7; black is only up a minor piece in material count if the gambit goes perfectly, which is not exactly crushing especially at lower levels
"This place changes people"
"Yeah, how?"
"In the past I was white"
this is one of the funniest video I have ever watched
Wait, holy shit, it's actually a giga brain move! Wtf! I gotta use this on my grandpa
don't bother the move only works if they play the thing at 0:07 which NOBODY DOES it's a fucking fake vid
Gonna use this on my dad but he will mostly see it coming.
@@shlokshah5379 i used it to my papa but i won because he ran out of time, i was playing white
all failed if they do knight c3
Your grandpa won't fall for it
I'm addicted to this.
I'm watching it for the fourth time
I am watching it too often... but I love it xD
Its beautiful
Ive been looking at this for 10 hours now
When you do all this and ur only one point up 😢
Black: "i win your queen"
White: "but what it cost?"
Black: "everything"
The uno reverse card
people try this trap all the time lmao its so funny to just take the free material and then get away with it
*_"TACTICAL NUKE, INCOMING!"_*
I used this trick the opponent fell for it and I had a mouse slip while capturing the queen and my queen ended up right in front of his.
Bruh
it's like ICBM with the black pieces
Finally, now i can play ICBM with both colors
"HAH YOU FELL FOR IT FOOL THUNDER CROSS SPLIT ATTACK"
I gotta try that opening now
Actually had a game like this, where I was playing as white. Should have realised that this was a trap sooner. However, I still managed to win by resignation, after taking black's queen, leaving the game in an endgame where I was up 2 rooks.
This is a message to anyone starting out in chess and those that are still at a low ELO rating: Don't give up just because your queen has been captured. She is powerful, but she is still only one of many pieces on the board.
I mean its not completely unwinnable anyhow even if you fall for it, as long as white knights into A3 immediatly after the queen cant really take anything else there and has to back off (or it will get trapped).
I love a good intercontinental ballistic missile.
"The masscare Begins.. Young One, Watch.. Watch as This Plague Commences."
Ah yes, the classic *INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE QUEEN*
That what we call inter continental ballistic missile gambit
Black : *"All according to **-keikaku-** plan"*
Poor White, got played like a fiddle xD
Black: "I'll take your Queen... and eat it!"
*Lacrimosa intensifies*
Hazzah! You fool! You fell for one of the classic blunders!
The music... The face... perfection
If someone pulls this on me, I'll just start crying on the spot
The incomprihensable horror made of tentacles and shapes beyond our three dimensions seemingly sneers in what looks to be contempt
"how do you plan to win by feeding me all your pieces?"
It continues, looking up at the cigar smoking man with glee, or prehaps disapointment, maybe anger, or maybe just holding a poker face...
"I thought you were suppoused to be a strategic genius"
The man calmly looks at the board, then back at the, now more feathery than tenticaled, thing. He then reaches down to a single piece on the board. The bird thing regaly, or maybe calmly, pregaps fearfuly, but at the very least slowly, glances down and then back to the man, then it quickly shifts back to staring at the board
"wha-! when did that queen get ther-!?"
A screech ripples through the immaterium and into reality through the eye of terror transported through vacuums and bastions alike.
*"CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!"*
This thing isn’t very good at chess.
only a TACTICAL GENIUS could have successfully pulled off such a maneuver
That man was Mr. Green
Noot nooot
@@ThePrime262 you: tactical genius
tactical genius: NOOOOT Nooot
When you feel happy after thinking opponent blundered their horse and then check your king side to see your queen has turned white
“Now I am become death, destroyer of worlds”
Someone needs to call an ambulance for this man, the best part is that I would totally fall for this lmao.
That's the reason why you shouldn't have go Pac-Man on Blitz or Bullet game at the beginning
Yeah, I don't use this tactic much, because it's easily counterable
I think of it the same as a Scholars mate. It will only work once on that player, but it will feel really good when it works.
And this would a good example of why people typically open with kingside pawn instead.
i think this is called the ballistic missile queen opening or something
That's why you need to play Nc3 with d4 gambits
Also, the people who play d7: 🙂
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play....
How about a nice game of chess?
And then you sacrifice... THE OPPONENT'S QUEEEEEEEN!!!
In the army there is a saying "When your attack is going well, you are walking into a trap."
Correct me if I'm wrong, i'm bad at chess, but won't this just allow him to take the bishop and maybe a pawn ? It's not like it's checkmate right ?
He took the queen the most important piece though
@@codeblue6925 Ohh right I just immediately forgot about the white queen after it was taken x)
@@terminatroll-_-3269 lol
It destroys the whole right side (queen-bishop-pawn-rook-knight...) And your queen is still alive.
@@sudanemamimikiki1527 what would be the best move for white afterwards? Bishop to G2 to defend the pawn? Move the G pawn and then the white bishop to free the rook? Maybe just take the L and move Knight to C3?
I’m dying from this 😂😂😂
Man just cross map sniped him with an ICBM
"Algith time to move my que- wheres my queen?"
That was smart ngl 😭🛐
I mastered this move as its been shown in the video
“The risk I took was calculated, but man, am I bad at math.”
intercontinental ballistic missile gambit is my fav
This is why, as black, when I see queen's pawn forwards, I respond in kind.
on the topic of "nom noms"; for some reason, in Indonesian chess terminology: you don't "capture" (tangkap) chess pieces, you "eat" (makan) them instead. But some people also call the "bishop" piece, the "rocket" piece instead so what do I know.
The classic intercontinental ballistic missile gambit
"why did my Queen turn black?!"
"My king, she forgot how to swim"
7 pawns vs 9 pawns.
Especially when this queen is weaker than 2 active pieces and 2 pawns imo.
The queen is about to eat every white piece without any ability for white to retaliate
@@detectivecolonel874 Na3 and every piece is well protected. Ok?
@@detectivecolonel874 or move a pawn to e4. Open a bishop. Then discovered attack to queen with a check. Boom. Now you have nothing.
@@Bruh-bk6yo is Kc3 not also a good move? I’m a little new to chess but that seems like a good opportunity for white to make a fork on the king and rook if black gets too hungry for pawns
@@cameronw253 seems like a good move because it attacks the queen. But the reason it worse than Na3 is because your pawn at c2 is not protected. At this position each pawn is expensive for you.
0:15 White be like: Yeah Boi. But the fact the man is black ._.
AYYYYYYY RACIST
Nakhmanson Gambit: allow me to introduce myself
I laughed like an absolute maniac with that ending.
I laughed too hard at this I don't even know how to play chess 😭😭😭
We need more of these :D
30th Subscriber :)
ah yes, the Intercontinental ballistic queen gambit
*Takes bishop after knight blocks*
*Pawn captures backwards*
Nice claim on the queen but that would be where the push would end for the most part if white moves the knight to put pressure on the queen
This wouldn't really work on 10 min game unless there blind but in bullet most cases it would work.
Just make it look like a mouse slip by premoving.
omg i was always the victim of this and finally i get a way to actually play it. Thank you so much
The King's Gambit:
f3 e5 g4 Qh4#
there you go you gambited the king
That would be losing about 8 points of material for a queen and infiltrating your opponent's back rank.
I say it's a pretty good deal.
And that’s chess for the people who don’t know how gambits work.
Now you're opponent is 9 points down and you have better positioning and can still castle. I may not be a chess player currently, but I remember some old tricks.
I actually bursted to laugh over Pingu's dramatic face. I rarely laugh at anything. Thank you.
Bro played the russian antiair, ground based RKB-SAM guided missile against a 500 elo 🗿🍷
The music makes it emotional xD
when you realise that u traded 2 pawns and 2 pieces for a queen witch is 8/8
You traded 1 pawn and 2 pieces. Remember, black takes a pawn as well
the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit
It was like the first strategy I learnt after I mastered the basic rules, we call in "Kid's mate", because only total newbies fall for it.
Black's only up 1 piece. But on the next move Black gets, they can A. eat the bishop B. Eat the c2 pawn if the bishop moves or C. Eat the e7 pawn
If black replies with Nc3, you can only do Qxc2 unless you wanna sac the queen or remove it from there
Fair point, but its at least a pawn either way
If black eats the bishop they inmediately lose to bishop b5 check which loses the queen to the rook's discovered attack
@@Uri433 how could either rook even check the king
@@bitnn4703 When did i say any rook checks the king? White bishop checks the black king, once white bishop moves that also clears the path for the rook to take the queen