Rebecca Mam has a different personality altogether. I just love the way how she explained everything. Truly enriched by her knowledge on the particular topic.
Great respects to Rebecca Mam, Your lecture is eye opener for many of the advocates who willing to learn about the cross examination. It really extraordinary sessions, and enrich our knowledge..
Depending upon the behavior and nature of the witnesses we should change the pattern of asking questions to witnesses. Types of cross examinations are as follows. 1. Bold cross examination, 2. Brow beating and bullying cross examination. 3. Dramatic cross examination, 4. Misleading cross examination, 5. Over cross examination, 6. Rapid and quick cross examination, 7.silent cross examination, 8. Suggestive cross examination, 9. Bad cross examination.
Very much disturbingly managed with utmost callousness. Absolutely unprofessional and unprecedented while discussing such a serious topic with such a great orator
Thank u for this wonderful session Can you request mam to give a lecture on: 1 ) habeas corpus - how to draft it , nuances and technicalities, mistakes to avoid in it etc 2 ) Nia cases as it has become very pertinent these days Will be highly grateful if mam Can guide us in these 2 aspects
The discussion was not upto mark. It appears that the emphasis of speakers was only to state the various propositions. In fact the emphasis should have been to highlight the areas the advocates do not care to look and master and that too in the light of various important provisions of evidence act about the admissibility and extent of admissibility of evidence. The rulings of Supreme Court on thiese aspects also should have been discussed. The relevant law on the nature of crime also should have been highlighted and discussed. Alok Saxena. District and Sessions Judge (Retd), Meerut.
🙏 Good Afternoon Friends🍒: **** What is Cross Examination ?. I feel that the right of cross examination is the statutory primary right of an Advocate at the trial court to detect and expose all the discrepancies or to elicit suppressed facts to sift the truth before the Court. If any one of my colleague Advocates interested and may want to play the tactful Game / Art they must read this in order to prevent the opponent unnecessarily every time disturbing you and in such an event you must have to know how to complaint the Court what exactly and which Rule was violated by the opposite party. All The Best. Always Yours, Bade Raghava Rao, Advocate, Vijayawada & High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
Rebecca Mam has a different personality altogether. I just love the way how she explained everything. Truly enriched by her knowledge on the particular topic.
Great respects to Rebecca Mam, Your lecture is eye opener for many of the advocates who willing to learn about the cross examination. It really extraordinary sessions, and enrich our knowledge..
Rebecca mam has treasure of knowledge in criminal trials, just love listening to her
Such a wonderful piece of work for you, if you are really interested in litigation
Depending upon the behavior and nature of the witnesses we should change the pattern of asking questions to witnesses. Types of cross examinations are as follows. 1. Bold cross examination, 2. Brow beating and bullying cross examination. 3. Dramatic cross examination, 4. Misleading cross examination, 5. Over cross examination, 6. Rapid and quick cross examination, 7.silent cross examination, 8. Suggestive cross examination, 9. Bad cross examination.
Wonderful and great learning experience respect n thanks to speakers and organisers.
Very much disturbingly managed with utmost callousness. Absolutely unprofessional and unprecedented while discussing such a serious topic with such a great orator
Thank u for this wonderful session
Can you request mam to give a lecture on:
1 ) habeas corpus - how to draft it , nuances and technicalities, mistakes to avoid in it etc
2 ) Nia cases as it has become very pertinent these days
Will be highly grateful if mam Can guide us in these 2 aspects
The discussion was not upto mark. It appears that the emphasis of speakers was only to state the various propositions. In fact the emphasis should have been to highlight the areas the advocates do not care to look and master and that too in the light of various important provisions of evidence act about the admissibility and extent of admissibility of evidence. The rulings of Supreme Court on thiese aspects also should have been discussed. The relevant law on the nature of crime also should have been highlighted and discussed.
Alok Saxena. District and Sessions Judge
(Retd), Meerut.
Amazing flow of language..
Please do a webinar on career after LLB ...and about pursuing cyber law
Eye opening discussion
Very good session
Excellent Thank you Madam
🙏
Good Afternoon Friends🍒:
****
What is Cross Examination ?.
I feel that the right of cross examination is the statutory primary right of an Advocate at the trial court to detect and expose all the discrepancies or to elicit suppressed facts to sift the truth before the Court. If any one of my colleague Advocates interested and may want to play the tactful Game / Art they must read this in order to prevent the opponent unnecessarily every time disturbing you and in such an event you must have to know how to complaint the Court what exactly and which Rule was violated by the opposite party.
All The Best.
Always Yours,
Bade Raghava Rao, Advocate, Vijayawada & High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
The accused can be she or he so please stand corrected.
rebecca is wrong in saying that the cross exn must be smooth
Superb
i think rebecaa is giving wrong information regarding giving reasons of defence.
If hindi all student get benefits...if possible please try hindi some small village students watch this ..... Respected my senior family