dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video 2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted. Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this, "Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims. Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell. If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”. Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying. We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours. If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative. Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to. Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Its actually sickening to see people curse, say bad about the mothers of the believers (may Allah be pleased with them)when Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala has forgiven them and is pleased with them. End of story.
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar. If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing... Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written. Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him? Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi. Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones. May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public . Hope this helps your understanding .
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
@@everythingandroidois Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
Weak response to be honest. I’ve seen quite a few response videos to Ammar‘s lectures this Ramadan, already, and none of them actually give a substantial counter-argument. The responses are either a mockery, or using other Shia scholars opinions or like in this video, picking out small things and not even giving a response that actually considers the argument of Aisha, for example, being in the wrong. A bunch of dodging around. Also if you claim some Hadiths from Bukhari are weak, then please do me a favour and stop claiming it to be Sahih and 100% authentic.
@@Syy-q5h The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books. All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition. If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism. The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home. We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol Y’all need to start acting human
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,.. But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊 Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on? I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal… Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language. Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa? So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS? Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong. But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions. P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
Hazrat Lots wife was disobedient, divorce her. Hazrat Nuhs son was disobedient, disown him. Even if its not "happly" as in pleasure, ALLAH is looking at POSSIBILITIES for divorce...
...but didn't. Allah says he will do many things to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he does such and such, this does not mean it will ever happen.
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
Thanks for the video. It sounds like you are reaffirming once again what Ammar said, making Ammar's point even stronger 😂😂😂 Delete your video brother. Weak refutation
@Moros368 not really.. he is saying that it's better for him to delete it cus it's truly embarrassing as a sunni I was waiting for a better more improved response. Farid in this vid unfortunately was just beating around the bush
@@NoorAli-kk9xq u sunni in the other comment u confessed to be a Shia 🤣🤣wtf taqiyah at highest form I have a screenshot for that anyways circular reasoning
Hazrat Aisha mother of believers died in 678 at age 67. Check for yourselves. Therefore born in 611. And married in 623. Therefore her marriage consummation happened at the age of ..... Calculate by yourselves
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
Subhanallah, the amount of cursing here is amazing. I will guarantee you that 99% of you didn't even listen to his videos and reasonings, yet 110% of you guys are cursing. Go listen first as ammar brings of all of his claims from Sunni books 📚. If you want to curse, curse the sunnis immas for writting those in your books. CURSE YOUR OWN IMMANS HBBIS.... curse your own Sahih al bukari and the other Shahi Books and your own imams who wrote them and narrated it...
Ngl they came here to comment not to watch the video they did the same with previous ones they use the same psychological tactics used by christian polemist comment and say things out of context no wonder why the shias are easily converted by missionaries
Did u event watched the whole video or just came here to commenting curses and lies your accusations is same as like Christian missionaries it's in your book it's in your book won't work why do u worship grave is that in the Qur'an or in book of ayotollahs
@@Moros368 dude relax your nerves man I can see them popping from your forhead. Maybe go have a nap and wait for iftar to cool down these topics are for adults, Ramadan Kareem
@Moros368 Read my comment again, please. It seems like you people have reading and understanding problems to the extent that you people can't even read your books even after someone pointing out and reading it louddddddddd page by page by page for you. Hbb bukari, muslim, tirmizi, others etc are not shai books they are sunni books... leave your biased, poison, and toxic mentality aside and read your own book like a normal human being... amar just points out what your own books are saying, and he is not disrespectful at all. Just showing the brothers what their own imams are saying and have written their own books. Why cursing Ammar then? Curse your own imams Go ask your own imams why such stuffs are in your own books. Simple as that hbb
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959? It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. (Authentic according to darussalam)
Please continue to rebuke all these videos. I have been watching them from day one because he pulls out every source and reads from them directly. I am unsure of attending taraweeh in jamah after watching his video because it Is clear from the hadiths that the prophet (PBUH) advised to do them individually in the homes. If you can make a video on that it would be helpful to clarify my confusion.
Follow the Sunnah of our holy Prophet brother, not the Sunnah of Umar You don’t have to go full Shi’a yet and commemorate the martyrdom of Husayn (AS) at the hands of Yazid etc., but at least both of our sects can agree on the clear instructions to avoid all innovations correct? And Allah only judges intentions, as long as we try our best to practice the truth he is the most Merciful
What are you saying? It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis. Most people do other stuff. Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
I wonder too, and it just happens to be about the same people who’s fathers stole saqifa, appointed Muwaia the governor of sham, started the war of Jamal etc…. Why is it it’s always the same characters????
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Allah exposed them When he revealed the verse and then the prophet Recite it, you think people didn't ask people didn't have an inclination to who he Was referring to A roamer mill went around and everybody knew to whom the verse was Referring to And as for The prophet peace be upon literary pointed at her house. And you deny when the truth is literally in your face, you put blinders on.
20:48 And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her. And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah? And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that. It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
Am i the only one who felt like this was a clear rebuttal and the evidence of the weakness in the chain of the hadith that the Brother Ammar accepts basically disintegrates all his points? As well as Ammar taking these english footnotes and treating them like real evidence? Alhamdullilah, thank you Farid for your excellent analysis as always and may Allah make clear the haqq from the batil
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
Yasir qadhi explained this incident which is related to hafsa coming to her own home early and saw maria the Coptic with the prophet. Hafsa was hurt by the incident that on her day and in her house maria was there. So to please hafsa prophet made maria haram for himself but told hafsa not to tell this to aisha....the honey incident doesn't seem proper bcz its not that big of a deal but hafsa seeing maria & prophet in her house suits more to the revelation
All you're doing is defending the people you "worship" without any real talk. I am a sunni, and I find your arguments baseless. This nakshwani guy is to the point, explaining what is in the Quran and sahih books. It's right there, there is no two ways about it. And people saying "mother of the believers" like she was the only wife/ves of the Prophet. The title "mother of the believers" was given because they could not re marry after the prophet passed on. Ammars lectures are an eye opener, and you better accept the fact that ahle sunna hides these things not wanting people to know about the filth that happened with the prophet. There's no explanation. Shame on you
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
If you are talking about how important al zahra was from Aisha’s own words then why do you sunnis call Aisha the one that you admit done so much bad as the mother of the believers but I hav never heard any of you call Fatima al zahra the mother of the believers. Why because she is the prophets daughter and not abu bakrs daughter? You say we worship the ahlulbayt more like you worship the sahaba and will never accept the wrong that they did! But on the day of judgement you can’t act blind when Allah swt exposes your arrogant blind heart
No offence that Br. Ammar sounds like a quack, even the way he says “Sallallahu Alaihi Wa alai"eats words" annoys me. If he cant even respect and send peace and blessing to our prophet properly, anything that he says is least credible to my ears.
@@Adam-iz5kh might be nothing for some, but my personal psychological reactance to avoid such people, the marvelous Quran person also used to say "Salaam un alaikum" it might be right, but it sounded disingenuous to me, then he went and made up new weird esoteric translation of Quran, so I avoid listening to him too. It is just these small quirks of some people whom after listening for a while, I get this feeling that they are misleading me.
@iznij3284 Sallallahu alaihi w alai has a different meaning than sallallahu walaihi wasalam. It means may peace and blessing be upon him ﷺ and his family, as opposed to just him.
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂 Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books? Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
Your weak arguemnt why did the prophet marry them if they are evil, why did nabi lut marry his wife? Nabi jacob also.had bad wives, nabi nuh etc.. also you have so many hadiths saying the prophet pointed at her house. And youse put in bracket eastward. Its actually embarassing
@FaridResponds you've never heard of hypocrisy have you? RasulAllah sawas words in bukhary and muslim, says to Imam Ali that only a believer loves your and a hypocrite hates you. Tell me when aisha raised an army with talha and.zubayr to fight Imam.Ali. this was out of love right? Or.hatred? When muawiya fought against his caliph as Aisha did in siffin, tell me does this mean he loves Imam Ali or hate him? Wallah it's so simple. I cannot simplify it anymore.
These shia preachers are truly making their place in Jahannam deeper and deeper with these statements of individuals Allah (God) stated clearly in the Quran he is PLEASED WITH. May (God) Guide them before the inevitable reality of death Radiallahu-anhum
If the truth makes me to be in hellfire then let it be. I don't have problem with that because I know the truth and Allah will reveal it with Mahdi (PBUH).
In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith.... According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim. Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today? If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar? Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows: 1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1). 2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101). 3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12). 4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47). 5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102). 6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154). 7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14). 8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60). 9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6). 10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16). Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites. Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement. Surah Ahzab 1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. Note: ___ When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. ) If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God. God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof? [Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________ 1. Surah Al-Imran: 144. Result____:@ "It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@ Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4) Translation: Kanzalaiman They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener. "Read carefully again" The Sunni sect is over
Present day Rafidi's are an extension of Banu Umaiyya who used to curse Ali RA on their Mimbars until Omer Bin Abdul Aziz RA abolished this practice in his Khilafa. So the point is Rafidi's don't call yourself Shia of Ali RA, but you are Shia of Banu Umaiyya. Lanatullahi alal jahiloon.
Aisha went to war with Ali enough said all of this back and forth is a total waste of time. Whos side are you on? Its clear you all have to go against Aisha or you going against the Caliph Ali? This for me is a huge red flag in Sunni Islam. I 100% would be going to war against Aisha but will you be making the same decision your stuck between a roch and a hard place.
Farid just exposed the flawed methodology Shi’as adopt. They’re unable to read a report without their preconceived hatred for the sahaba Ra and wives of the prophet ﷺ, they share this attribute with Christians and Jews who attack the prophet ﷺ. Absolute masterclass by farid in how to deconstruct the lies of the Shi’as. This is why Nakshawani has avoided debating a Sunni throughout his entire career. Shi’as wake up don’t fall for the emotional manipulative lies of your speakers.
To be very honest, with keeping prejudice for you guys at the side, and having taken a neutral approach I do not find a single point presented by Farid to be even worthy of being considered as a REPLY. He was only using the tactics used by you guys since ages, and all of the points he mentioned can be easily refuted Wasted my 22 minutes over a video having no response. No doubt why you got thrashed by Christian polemicists 😂
That isn't a neutral approach at the slightest. Also, accusing us of lying and deception and trickery to bring more emotional baggage to your texts prove that you weren't thinking straight while writing this but simply wanted to rant and support Nakshawani's ridiculous claims out of a feeling of offense. I don't really believe you people honestly reject the piety of the Prophet's wives so either you are uneducated on the matter or you belong to Nakshawani's faction.
The "happly" part was the funniest part of the video. Change my mind.
Ibn kuthair.
@@Bulayla1426Yeah that one too 😂
its "haply" actually which means perhaps, not happily, which he misread 'happly' as... he should read more old books.
dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
@@Bulayla1426 why he sound different... he try to give every word his own touch...😅
May Allah be pleased with the mothers of believers
Yes they are mothers of believers but their hearts are deviated just like the wives of prophets Nuhu and Lut.
@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@@abiabi9353bro these are your mothers your talking about do you think their blood is halal?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
okay 'Peter'
You missed the part 'As a sunni' in your comment .
I know you do taqiyya but this is embarrassing 😂
@@Check_my_playlists You can't label anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view as a shia doing taqiyya lol.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video
2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted.
Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this,
"Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
May Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى reward you immensely for defending the Prophet ﷺ’s honor, and the mother of the believers رضي الله عنهم
May Allah bless the Prophet ﷺ and his pure beloved progeny.
Ameen
I think ( رضي الله عنهنَّ ) will be more accurate as mothers of the believers are woman
امين it is incumbent upon us to speak up against these batil munafiqs ❌ thank you Br Farid بارك الله فيك
Clearly can’t handle the facts they wasn’t part of 33.33 only a fool can’t see it
"Rafidha are the donkeys of Jews"
Minhaj al-Sunnah by Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, vol 1, page 21.
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@Adam-iz5kh Majoosi Hadith attributed to the prophet ﷺ
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
@@Adam-iz5kh Check Da’if al-Jamī’ al-Sāghīr by al-Albāni, Hadith 1974.
Current situation in Gazza shows who are the donkeys of jews.
Ahmak.
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
Only if you listen to it properly instead of typing stupid stuff then you would of understood
lol he is literally saying this is not sahih bukhari because that book doesnt have brackets @@MuhammedKus-iu7ls 😂😂
@@MuhammedKus-iu7ls understand what bro? They guy commenting said it as it is no refuting no evidence end of story. Khalaas
farid's entire schtick is "i know better so i wont address any arguments"
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
@@ashketchum1793 Have you watched his (Sayed Ammar) video? He uses the Sahih Books and Holy Quran. In the end, you make your judgement.
Show sources
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
People always be targeting Islam for no reason
why do you have shaytan in your name?
@@Adam-iz5kh Making fun of Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism)
Twelver Shias are not Muslims.
@@lithium8847-er2oj Why?
Because they believe in prophets after the the last and final messenger this takes you out of the fold of islam and they go against the Quran ofcourse
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
Facts ❤
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims.
Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell.
If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”.
Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying.
We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours.
If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative.
Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to.
Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
1.Are you dumb????????????? NUH AND LUT DIVORCED THEIR WIVES WTFFFFF 2. Bro he used Bukhari and Muslim are you blind or what?@@abdelqadir5227
@@abdelqadir5227 why are you pretending to be a muslim?
@@abdelqadir5227very weak response .
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Exactly lol this clown Farid has no comebacks to Sayed Ammar
Its actually sickening to see people curse, say bad about the mothers of the believers (may Allah be pleased with them)when Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala has forgiven them and is pleased with them. End of story.
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar.
If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing...
Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Thank you for being honest, I encourage you to continue looking for the truth may Allah guide you
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written.
Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
Brother Farid, I bought your book on the martyrdom of hussein ra. InshaAllah I will read it. It's a bengali translation.
Can you pls name the translation ?
@@ahmedmuniyat9213 কারবালা বাস্তবতা বনাম কল্পকথা
লেখক : ফরিদ আল বাহরাইনি
প্রকাশনী : ইলম হাউজ পাবলিকেশন
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him?
Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
Glorification of the sahaba at the prophet (saws) and his family’s (as) expense,… eVERy tIme 😮😢
Jazakallah Akhi
You clearly didn’t watch the video properly. Go watch it again and especially about the verse of repentance
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
😅
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Ok sons of bidah 👍🏽
@@Syy-q5h clown shia shut up
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
How funny you said it’s private matter , if it’s private why Allah would mention it in Quran !!
Beautiful question. I'll share an answer on twitter.
If it's public why doesn't it mention them by name . Please listen to the video properly
I mean the Prophet SAW didn’t marry like 50 women. So if it’s saying 2 wives in Quran, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out who could be.
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 don’t say Allah fails
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi.
Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones.
May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
Facts they have no imam.
Facts 😂
As a Sunni, I agree that Ammar was impressive in his arguments, but Farid was very weak in the rebuttal
Syed Ammar literally made crazy conclusions and you are here with your confirmation biases without listening to what Farid actually has to say.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
Wallahi, I can’t stand his way of talking, let alone his broken aqida…
Same. He sounds like emasculated zesty transgender part of the rainbow community
Same my man, I felt like muting D':
same here.. ammar’s voice is as irritating as appus n hatun…
@@eerievon2208 Him saying Ibn Kuthayr was the peak for me 💀
@@ifad 🤣🤣.. ibn kuthayr.. too much persian slang.. 🤣🤣🤣.. oh someone please make ammar bite the curb… 🤣🤣
People focus on worship and these rafidha focus on us😂❤
They are real kufar they worship 12 demigods
Rafidah are divorced from the Quran and the seerah. Rafidah are only interested in tabloid fabricated narrations....
Silly shias...trix are for kids!!
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Shiaism is a myth about 12 demigods.
Islam is about Allah
@@Adam-iz5kh Ammar was the one who started these accusations lol. What are you on?
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public .
Hope this helps your understanding .
@@ashketchum1793but is it alright to lie when you are jealous? Is this what aisha is teaching. And what does age have to do with anything
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
I want to see it in the books - where is it mentioned Aishah was 16. Brother Farid needs to point it out
@@ashketchum1793 Reading the Quran and "sahih" Sunni hadiths = Slander?
Nah Ammar won this one, your video is very weak and this comes from a Muslim who doesn’t consider himself Shia or Sunni
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
Who was more beloved to prophet (sa)? Khadiza or Ali (ra)?
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
From what gathered so far his points were : she's 16 = she's a young innocent lady. And also replace happily with happly
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
@@iamibrahim99
the word is ''Haply''... which means by chance. There could be a typo in the book I guess.
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
Kaafir bark elsewhere.
what
@@Mayochup191 they make their own delusions lol
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
indeed Ayesha prayed and did good things but also she fought against the forth Khalif which was not a good thing.
See my video on al-Jamal.
why does he keep saying "kuthayr"?
cringe fr
Did Farid really compare Aisha and Hafsa with Hitler ? 😂
More like I compared how people can treat Hitler is a more objective way than how some Shias treat the wives in their understanding of the narratives.
Don't say the 'wives', we respect them. It's only those 2. And I think Sayed Ammar has clarified that stance as well.
@@Ali-ti8hfThey are both your mothers.
@@everythingandroidois
Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time
You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
You clearly have comprehension issues
Weak response to be honest. I’ve seen quite a few response videos to Ammar‘s lectures this Ramadan, already, and none of them actually give a substantial counter-argument. The responses are either a mockery, or using other Shia scholars opinions or like in this video, picking out small things and not even giving a response that actually considers the argument of Aisha, for example, being in the wrong. A bunch of dodging around.
Also if you claim some Hadiths from Bukhari are weak, then please do me a favour and stop claiming it to be Sahih and 100% authentic.
They have no rebuttal whatsoever. They result to name calling and bs . Their entire religion is brainwashed. I’m so happy to be a Shia.
😅🎉👏
That’s what I’ve been saying. They seem to all sound like excuses.
4:33
He speaks as if God were like humans Sometimes he is ready and sometimes he is not ready .
The fact that he looks so satisfied takes the cake. By the way, Allah exonerated Aisha, the mother of the believers. FULL STOP.
Allah also said u n one side n me one one side.
If Allah SWT even did, that exoneration happened BEFORE this incident
@@user_db769 Allah says, "The Prophet is more worthy of the believers than themselves, and his wives are their mothers." [Surah al-Ahzab 33:6]
@@user_db769I love prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alayahi Wa Salaam more than all my family combined and love those whom he loved like Aisha R.A.
He did it because he loves them? 😂😂😂😂 at this point I can’t even argue it’s beyond stupid!
So you think prophet (SA) made halal haram at whim?
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku another stupid response. I think it’s this level of stupidity is common in responses!
@@Syy-q5h
The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
@@Syy-q5h
You are too dumb to understand my point.
Why did he seek their pleasure?
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books.
All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
I memorzie whole Quran with meaning (learned arabic for that) and ahlul bayt in the Quran is the wives of the prophet (sa).
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw
The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition.
If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
We focus on our worship and religion and they focus on us
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
So sunnis have never made vids on shias? Ur not that bright r u?
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism.
The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home.
We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking
And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol
Y’all need to start acting human
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,..
But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊
Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
Now they don't want Sayyidah Aisha AS to even be human, and to be a robot like the rawafidh🤦🏼♂
What a pathetic response
I've checked from sunni sources and these 2 wives of the holy prophet were not good
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism
It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on?
I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal…
Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language.
Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa?
So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral
Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people
So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS?
Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
Great analysis
They say ,. Find a clear proof of any Imam(as) in Quran ,. I wanna see where a prophet (as) appointed his best friend to succeed him 😮😅
@@jaleel42do you deny hadith Thaqalayn?
@@Virgoingaway re read what I wrote
Of course they take it from them. Omar called the Prophet (saw) a delirious and they agreed what else you want as proof.
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
The actualy paul of islam is called umar ibn khattab , the one who introduced bidas in islam.
a polytheist, dajjal found.@@noorhussain6462
Come face me in real life I’ll fix you
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Do you know WHY that verse was revealed? And how it relates to Talha the Sahabi?
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong.
But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions.
P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up
Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
They're الكفار just like the so-called "Quraniyun".
Aisha and Hafsa were like the wives of Noah and Lott. They never divorced them, yet they were evil. Aisha and Hafsa were evil the same way.
Prove that Nuh (as) and Lut (as) knew about the reality of their wives.
Where they punished the same way ???
@@rcmysm9123it was example of betrayal and disbelief unlike incase of hafsa and Aisha while Ammar is exaggerating
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
@@rcmysm9123 when it comes to ppl like something obvious doesn't matter
My brother your evidence is weak against brother Ammar. Good job with trying, but you have not proved anything sufficient against Ammar evidence.
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
نَحْنُ النَّار والاِعْصَار مَهْمَا صَار
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
كَا الزِّلزَال لِلْاَرْذَالْ كُلُّنْ قَال
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
عَمْرُوْ عَابِسُنْ بَشْرُ
مُسْلِمُنْ بَدْرُ
نَفْتَدِيْكَا نَفْتَدِيْكَا
فَخْرُ يَوْمَ عَاشُوْرَاء نُسْعِدُ الزَّهْرَاء
يا حسين يا حسين
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
😂😂😂
Hazrat Lots wife was disobedient, divorce her.
Hazrat Nuhs son was disobedient, disown him.
Even if its not "happly" as in pleasure, ALLAH is looking at POSSIBILITIES for divorce...
...but didn't.
Allah says he will do many things to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he does such and such, this does not mean it will ever happen.
Alhamdulillah
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
Ask yourself why would Allah reveals such verses about some of these wives ?!!!
@@almoola1for context
They are the mother of the believers in the sense that you can't marry them after the prophet,that's what Allah means there.Can you marry your mother?
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
Thanks for the video. It sounds like you are reaffirming once again what Ammar said, making Ammar's point even stronger 😂😂😂
Delete your video brother. Weak refutation
U contradicted yourself after threatening him to delete it why cause it exposed ammars lying
@Moros368 not really.. he is saying that it's better for him to delete it cus it's truly embarrassing as a sunni I was waiting for a better more improved response. Farid in this vid unfortunately was just beating around the bush
@@NoorAli-kk9xq u sunni in the other comment u confessed to be a Shia 🤣🤣wtf taqiyah at highest form I have a screenshot for that anyways circular reasoning
@@Moros368 I'm born sunni recently (mohtadi) alhamduallah. Was counting on Brother Farid to change my mind. Dissapointing lol
Hazrat Aisha mother of believers died in 678 at age 67. Check for yourselves. Therefore born in 611. And married in 623. Therefore her marriage consummation happened at the age of ..... Calculate by yourselves
13
If this correct, then it is not far off from mother Maryam giving birth to Isa (A) at 13/14.
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
Yea right
Worst response I've seen in a while xD watch the whole video of Syed Ammar, fear god for your cherry picking.
You basically confirmed everything he said lol
Are you deaf or blind of just absolute more on?
Subhanallah, the amount of cursing here is amazing. I will guarantee you that 99% of you didn't even listen to his videos and reasonings, yet 110% of you guys are cursing. Go listen first as ammar brings of all of his claims from Sunni books 📚. If you want to curse, curse the sunnis immas for writting those in your books.
CURSE YOUR OWN IMMANS HBBIS.... curse your own Sahih al bukari and the other Shahi Books and your own imams who wrote them and narrated it...
Ngl they came here to comment not to watch the video they did the same with previous ones they use the same psychological tactics used by christian polemist comment and say things out of context no wonder why the shias are easily converted by missionaries
Preach👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Did u event watched the whole video or just came here to commenting curses and lies your accusations is same as like Christian missionaries it's in your book it's in your book won't work why do u worship grave is that in the Qur'an or in book of ayotollahs
@@Moros368 dude relax your nerves man I can see them popping from your forhead. Maybe go have a nap and wait for iftar to cool down these topics are for adults, Ramadan Kareem
@Moros368
Read my comment again, please. It seems like you people have reading and understanding problems to the extent that you people can't even read your books even after someone pointing out and reading it louddddddddd page by page by page for you.
Hbb bukari, muslim, tirmizi, others etc are not shai books they are sunni books... leave your biased, poison, and toxic mentality aside and read your own book like a normal human being... amar just points out what your own books are saying, and he is not disrespectful at all. Just showing the brothers what their own imams are saying and have written their own books. Why cursing Ammar then? Curse your own imams Go ask your own imams why such stuffs are in your own books. Simple as that hbb
Bro it sounds like your confirming what the Shia guy said
Because it is undeniable
@@Adam-iz5kh
In your shia demigods dream
@@uthman2281 Allah (swt) is my lord.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Yeah + 12 demigods
@@uthman2281 La ilaha illallah ☝️
When we ask rafidhis to prove their false religion from their own books: *opens sahih bukhari and draws his own imaginary conclusions*
lmaooo true. These guys have no shame and I saw Ammaar's videos on Mut'ah, I had a good laugh. I can't believe these guys are real
يا ذاكر الأصحاب...
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959?
It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed:
"O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse.
(Authentic according to darussalam)
May allah guide our sunni brothers and sisters to the correct path
You mean the grave-worshipping, flagellating, legalised prostitution, worshipping in demigods, 'version' of Islam?
Please continue to rebuke all these videos. I have been watching them from day one because he pulls out every source and reads from them directly. I am unsure of attending taraweeh in jamah after watching his video because it Is clear from the hadiths that the prophet (PBUH) advised to do them individually in the homes. If you can make a video on that it would be helpful to clarify my confusion.
Follow the Sunnah of our holy Prophet brother, not the Sunnah of Umar
You don’t have to go full Shi’a yet and commemorate the martyrdom of Husayn (AS) at the hands of Yazid etc., but at least both of our sects can agree on the clear instructions to avoid all innovations correct?
And Allah only judges intentions, as long as we try our best to practice the truth he is the most Merciful
JazakAllahu kiran
As always no response from Sufis against rafidis. Zindeeq people
What are you saying?
It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis.
Most people do other stuff.
Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
Mate your knowledge and explanation is no where near syed Amman naqshwani.Explanation has been given from Sunni books not his own text
Why would Allah reveal a VERSE in the Quran, if it's simply about jealousy?
I wonder too, and it just happens to be about the same people who’s fathers stole saqifa, appointed Muwaia the governor of sham, started the war of Jamal etc…. Why is it it’s always the same characters????
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
It's unfortunate for muslims that they don't reflect upon the Qur'an especially Surah At-Tahrim.
Fareed, brother, can you answer the videos against you from "Muhammad" (Hadeeth rejector)?
Specify a point worth refuting.
Allah exposed them
When he revealed the verse and then the prophet Recite it, you think people didn't ask people didn't have an inclination to who he Was referring to A roamer mill went around and everybody knew to whom the verse was Referring to And as for The prophet peace be upon literary pointed at her house. And you deny when the truth is literally in your face, you put blinders on.
Facts ❤
20:48
And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her.
And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah?
And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that.
It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
Am i the only one who felt like this was a clear rebuttal and the evidence of the weakness in the chain of the hadith that the Brother Ammar accepts basically disintegrates all his points? As well as Ammar taking these english footnotes and treating them like real evidence? Alhamdullilah, thank you Farid for your excellent analysis as always and may Allah make clear the haqq from the batil
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
You can trivilialize serious matters like that as being immature??
Aisha mocked Lady Khadija’s (AS) age & appearance in front of our Prophet. You find that behavior acceptable?
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
reminds me of 2016 farid with the shia refutations
Yasir qadhi explained this incident which is related to hafsa coming to her own home early and saw maria the Coptic with the prophet. Hafsa was hurt by the incident that on her day and in her house maria was there. So to please hafsa prophet made maria haram for himself but told hafsa not to tell this to aisha....the honey incident doesn't seem proper bcz its not that big of a deal but hafsa seeing maria & prophet in her house suits more to the revelation
Such a weak and emotional response. Very disappointing
Majus
All you're doing is defending the people you "worship" without any real talk. I am a sunni, and I find your arguments baseless. This nakshwani guy is to the point, explaining what is in the Quran and sahih books. It's right there, there is no two ways about it. And people saying "mother of the believers" like she was the only wife/ves of the Prophet. The title "mother of the believers" was given because they could not re marry after the prophet passed on. Ammars lectures are an eye opener, and you better accept the fact that ahle sunna hides these things not wanting people to know about the filth that happened with the prophet. There's no explanation. Shame on you
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
@@belabarlina6627your mothers lol 😂
Unbelievable the deception these people are capable of.
Absolutely insane!
Rafzis worship abululu and have a big shrine (temple) of that majoosi in iran
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
@@admin202
Your Umar literally tried to recite TORAH in front of our holy Prophet, who’s following Judaism now buddy😂😂
If you are talking about how important al zahra was from Aisha’s own words then why do you sunnis call Aisha the one that you admit done so much bad as the mother of the believers but I hav never heard any of you call Fatima al zahra the mother of the believers. Why because she is the prophets daughter and not abu bakrs daughter? You say we worship the ahlulbayt more like you worship the sahaba and will never accept the wrong that they did! But on the day of judgement you can’t act blind when Allah swt exposes your arrogant blind heart
Quran 33:6 refers to his wives as the mothers of the believers.
No offence that Br. Ammar sounds like a quack, even the way he says “Sallallahu Alaihi Wa alai"eats words" annoys me. If he cant even respect and send peace and blessing to our prophet properly, anything that he says is least credible to my ears.
He is Not a brother he is a liar a 12 demigods worshipper
wait what is wrong with that
@@Adam-iz5kh might be nothing for some, but my personal psychological reactance to avoid such people, the marvelous Quran person also used to say "Salaam un alaikum" it might be right, but it sounded disingenuous to me, then he went and made up new weird esoteric translation of Quran, so I avoid listening to him too.
It is just these small quirks of some people whom after listening for a while, I get this feeling that they are misleading me.
@iznij3284 Sallallahu alaihi w alai has a different meaning than sallallahu walaihi wasalam. It means may peace and blessing be upon him ﷺ and his family, as opposed to just him.
@@Adam-iz5kh thanks for the info, I will still follow my sixth sense and avoid such people.
brother keep responding and exposing this guy cuz he's been yapping a lot lately.
I wish he would see this or that you would say this in real life and he'd overhear you.
@@jaclynholland-strauss7054or what? He gonna smoke some shisha or get another tattoo lmao?
You goof
Exposing what, he is reading from Sahih Books and the Holy Quran. At the end you make up your own judgement.
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂
Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books?
Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
@@dontwatchmee I encourage you to read.
Your weak arguemnt why did the prophet marry them if they are evil, why did nabi lut marry his wife? Nabi jacob also.had bad wives, nabi nuh etc.. also you have so many hadiths saying the prophet pointed at her house. And youse put in bracket eastward. Its actually embarassing
Easy... Lut (as) didn't know the state of his wife.
@FaridResponds ohhh really? He didn't know. He thought she was a believer the whole.time? She managed to fool him? Are you okay?
@@HR-313 If she knew that she was a kafira that would betray him, marrying her would've been impermissible. Go ahead and prove that he knew though.
@FaridResponds you've never heard of hypocrisy have you? RasulAllah sawas words in bukhary and muslim, says to Imam Ali that only a believer loves your and a hypocrite hates you. Tell me when aisha raised an army with talha and.zubayr to fight Imam.Ali. this was out of love right? Or.hatred? When muawiya fought against his caliph as Aisha did in siffin, tell me does this mean he loves Imam Ali or hate him? Wallah it's so simple. I cannot simplify it anymore.
@@HR-313 Nice attempt to derail when you lack proof. ;)
These shia preachers are truly making their place in Jahannam deeper and deeper with these statements of individuals Allah (God) stated clearly in the Quran he is PLEASED WITH. May (God) Guide them before the inevitable reality of death
Radiallahu-anhum
If the truth makes me to be in hellfire then let it be. I don't have problem with that because I know the truth and Allah will reveal it with Mahdi (PBUH).
Im sorry but, those were from your own books? He was literally reading the stuff from your books, like what???
In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith....
According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim.
Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today?
If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar?
Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran
The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows:
1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1).
2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101).
3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12).
4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47).
5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102).
6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154).
7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14).
8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60).
9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6).
10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16).
Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites.
Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement.
Surah Ahzab
1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
Note: ___
When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. )
If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God.
God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof?
[Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________
1. Surah Al-Imran: 144.
Result____:@
"It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@
Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4)
Translation: Kanzalaiman
They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener.
"Read carefully again"
The Sunni sect is over
Great video Akhi. Jazakallah Khairan for making it
That's your response? Wow. Brother, watch Sayed Ammar subjectively and with an open mind...
Can you please confirm whether the books he is narrating from authenic sunni books.
If you watch his video you'll get the answer
Watch the video
Please watch the video, because unfortunately this video does no justice. He is reading only for Sahih Books and Holy Quran.
Present day Rafidi's are an extension of Banu Umaiyya who used to curse Ali RA on their Mimbars until Omer Bin Abdul Aziz RA abolished this practice in his Khilafa. So the point is Rafidi's don't call yourself Shia of Ali RA, but you are Shia of Banu Umaiyya. Lanatullahi alal jahiloon.
Lol wtf
Aisha went to war with Ali enough said all of this back and forth is a total waste of time. Whos side are you on? Its clear you all have to go against Aisha or you going against the Caliph Ali? This for me is a huge red flag in Sunni Islam. I 100% would be going to war against Aisha but will you be making the same decision your stuck between a roch and a hard place.
Farid just exposed the flawed methodology Shi’as adopt. They’re unable to read a report without their preconceived hatred for the sahaba Ra and wives of the prophet ﷺ, they share this attribute with Christians and Jews who attack the prophet ﷺ. Absolute masterclass by farid in how to deconstruct the lies of the Shi’as. This is why Nakshawani has avoided debating a Sunni throughout his entire career. Shi’as wake up don’t fall for the emotional manipulative lies of your speakers.
To be very honest, with keeping prejudice for you guys at the side, and having taken a neutral approach
I do not find a single point presented by Farid to be even worthy of being considered as a REPLY. He was only using the tactics used by you guys since ages, and all of the points he mentioned can be easily refuted
Wasted my 22 minutes over a video having no response.
No doubt why you got thrashed by Christian polemicists 😂
That isn't a neutral approach at the slightest.
Also, accusing us of lying and deception and trickery to bring more emotional baggage to your texts prove that you weren't thinking straight while writing this but simply wanted to rant and support Nakshawani's ridiculous claims out of a feeling of offense.
I don't really believe you people honestly reject the piety of the Prophet's wives so either you are uneducated on the matter or you belong to Nakshawani's faction.
Shias are basically Christians, so of course you make this comment.
Where's your refutation or is it just usual circular reasoning typical response from Ammar fans 😂
Why do irani Iraqi ex shias curse Ali and convert to Christianity any say don't u know what's happening in iran