all his moral arguments have crumbled because he is a Bible believing Christian, he literally has nothing new to offer except recycled arguments ♻️🤦♂️
Excellent response by brother Farid as usual. He absolutely decimates these same old tired and stale regurgitated nonsense that Wood and his little sidekick spew. It is clear that these guys have nothing of substance to bring towards Muslims. May Allah reward the brother for having the patience to sit through the videos of these irritating guys
These guys don’t know what it means to be productive. They think he’s just finding some random guy nobody cares about and debunking them for no reason. That’s why Muslims don’t watch these videos.
@@chantjelly6773 if you werent such a dummy then you would know that Farid makes these videos for the lay public who wouldnt know any better about the trashy stuff they bring
Yeah I think you highlighted the main point...Farid is very patient MashaaAllaah. Bahrain people bro...Bahrain people. They seem very down to earth. David, on the other hand, doesn't come off as any Christian I would ever chill with. No God fearing Christian is that arrogant.
Speaks volumes of how corrupt christianity is - when their "scholars" closest ally in trying to attack Islam is an Atheist. Like imagine that... he has to team up with a person that mocks god to try and prove christianity is true?
@@crustykeycap5670 Lmao I never said that... and no the Qur'an does not state that. I am saying how idiotic it is that he has to adopt atheistic morality and viewpoints as well as purposely misconstrue whatever Islam says to portray Islam is bad. You literally saw it in the video - how david wood literally ignored what Farid said and went off and talked about something else. What I am tryna say is -- it's absurd to see this "Christian" link arms with a "atheist" (who are also kuffar by Christian text). Like how could you believe this man is christian - he might as well be atheist.
@@crustykeycap5670 lol, missing the point Why can't these so-called Christians argue based on Christian ethics instead of secular liberal ethics? Why do they argue using an atheist framework instead of a Christian framework? The answer: they have nothing to stand on in the modern world, they let their faith get watered down and corrupted, and now for supposed believers, their closest buddies are atheists that regularly mock God.
I'm afraid I don't understand Farid's response, though. Does the Qur'an not refer to the Scriptures the Christians and Jews had with them at the time as authoratitive? That is, it refers to them as accurate in the present (at the time) tense? We have copies of those Scriptures, and they match the ones from both before and after the time of Mohammed - did I somehow miss when Farid explained that they are not affirming currently (at the time, which matches both earlier and later manuscripts) available Scripture?
@@MohammadIrfan-v8q this is my point though - WHEN did Farid refute it? All the language the Qur'an uses when talking about the Injil and Tawrah imply a presently exiting and accessible text that is never implied to be flawed. When it contradicts what they say it never says it is correcting them, which implies it is claiming to be citing them.
@@lukecox6317 give the verse Farid didn't refute it because the video didn't contain the argument.... Where from where did u get this idea that they are not flawed?
0:00 Intro 0:13 Some grown adults acting like clowns 2:16 Farid makes a point 2:50 David strawman 3:29 Farid makes a point 4:00 David strawman 4:51 Farid makes a point 5:26 David strawman 6:24 Fans calling out David for being money greedy 6:54 David makes a claim without proof 7:24 David repeats his meme card argument w/ response 8:43 “I believe in thee and in Him who revealed thee” w/ response 9:43 “They have the tawrah and injeel with them” w/ response 10:45 Another point w/ response 12:11 The Qur’ān is familiar with very small details within previous scriptures 14:25 David misquotes the Qur’ān!! 15:32 David exhibits severe ignorance about the Qur’ān although this is his favourite argument topic 16:39 David proposes a strange commentary on a Hadith- however the full Hadith is Sahīh al Bukharī 7363 which is even more explicit and unequivocal in corruption
That sounds right...not to mention not bringing any new knowledge. This means they are not reading new books or learning more. That is never good for even your intellect, forget your faith.
@@kenid4144 Ad Hominem occurs when you direct an argument against a person INSTEAD of the said person's position. In this case, Farid has already dealt with David's position, so criticizing Ridwan doesn't mean that OP or others in this thread are committing the ad hominem fallacy.
@@joseduarte2146 Okay.. and all the other times that David burnt that wood bastard? What about that? Oh yeah! We turn a blind eye! Muhammad Hijab is neither a scholar of Islam, neither does his views change the whole theology of Islam. Allah does not pray to anyone, the "prayer" you talk about is "blessings" that Allah sends upon prophet Muhammad.
Christians literally confronted Hijab on this in Speakers Corner. He said not only do they have a problem understanding Quran but also a hearing issue. He said praise and not prays
6:25 Look how mature and respectful the commenter was compared to David's childish replies. Is that how a man of God / follower of Jesus should behave like? And CP is much worse. I hope Christians wake up and realize they're idolizing the wrong people.
@@NCSiebertdesign Jesus will deny the workers of lawlessness. Jesus came to uphold the Law and fulfill it not to abolish totally. Matthew 7:23 ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
@@letmetalk2240 I thought muslims believe bible are corrupted. Your words against yourselves. Muslims are example of lawlessness, because they abrogated everything Jesus said and laws God given to Moses.
Apuss gotta be top 10 meat rider of all time 😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bro does not even now what he is doing here bro don’t even know that he is a atheist anymore 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@mrcombustiblelemon2902 you think you did something right now? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 do Cristians think after bringing these things they did something 😂😂😂😂😂😂 you can’t defend your weak religion barely anyone of you cristians bring claims against Islam with sincerity I onsl know a handful of people you are probably a Cristian who think that I and the father are one proves that Jesus is God
@@cocoalfaridah5831 your questions are all non sequitors. It was called canaan first. And the cananites are the modern palestinians as proven by dna testing and carbon dating. People lived there you imb.ecile. that s a historical fact. It s even in the old testament 🤣🤣. Guess who never lived there: european jews. Now it s my turn: Why do old bibles prior to 1948 have palestine on a map with the borders that the occupier has set for himself today??? Isnt that weird? Why did herzl call it palestine in 1880s his own book that founded zionism? Why did the current occupier acknowledge the land before when you dont??? Go ahead. Answer it. You can.t
I'm a little tired of our muslim brothers giving Wood and Apuss so much attention. Yes, it's fun sometimes to expose their nonsense. But honestly, I think talking about dumb and dumber is keeping us from greater things.
I would agree with you but after seeing how many people listen to them and guys like chritsian prince , sometimes i think response videos are necessary
@@lynackhilou4865 Projecting? 😅 We know all your dawah guys online are clowns. From Yasir Qadhi to Zakir Naik to Hamzas den....that why we listen to people who expose what your dawah guys hide.
I think he is also gifted with a truly amazing brain. He never takes anything personally...he only addresses the arguments of the other side, no matter how low they go. Emotional maturity is amazing. I am very jealous lol. :)
16:50 That’s actually not the full saying of ibn Abbas… in Sahih al-Bukhari 7363, ibn Abbas literally says: “Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and ALLAH HAS TOLD YOU that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) CHANGED THEIR SCRIPTURE AND DISTORTED IT, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!"… So he clearly says that they distorted their books and changed it. How clear is that?!
False. Abbas meant some interpretations and meanings were distorted, and new revelations were false. The Torah or Gospel itself was never tampered with Tasfir Ibn Kathir 3 78, Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves
Ibn Abbas, the person you referenced said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed." According Abbas, the Torah and Injil are perfectly persevered
@@hcro5Did you even read what you quoted? The last line? "That people misguided others by addition and false interpretation relying on books that they wrote themselves?" And Todays Bible is not words of Allah, Rather its words of Unknown People. And You dont know where injil is? ie revelation of Allah to Jesus pbuh. Also I didnt found this hadith but still it doesnt incline with what you wanna prove. And the hadith that is quoted above is Authentic. This clearly smashes your claim.
@@hcro5 Yes, the people of the book added verses claiming they are from god when they are not… We can say that the ORIGINAL Torah and Gospel did not change… Our point still stands.
@@hcro5problem is, those two 'books' (or recitation, since back then people still write on stones and leathers) are no longer in this world... so yes by definition it can't be changed by 'a creation' anymore.
6:29 this was actually sickening to read. David was being so rude and obnoxious to someone making valid and respectful criticism. He even apologised but David just insults him more 😑 He has the nerve to call him a narcissist even tho taking criticism poorly and acting defensive is literally a symptom of narcissism 🤦♀️
بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... .'''''..''''''
It is telling you something when an atheist and a Christian are helping hand, trying their best to disprove Islam. But Islam will prevail. Islam the unconquerable the unfallen.
Alhamdulillah you exist. May Allah bless you, for sure i would fall into kuffr if you wouldn't be here. Dont stop with the Refutings to these Ahlal Kitabis
16:43 David proving *once more* his determination to avoid the obvious. Narrated Ubaidullah: Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, *and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain.* Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!" Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 7363 In-book reference : Book 96, Hadith 90 USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 9, Book 92, Hadith 461 Go ahead, David, continue to play dumb to your gulible audience who can't be bothered to think beyond your golf ball sized bubble. The only ones getting the laugh out of it are the Muslims.
bro can you answer this Tasfir Ibn Kathir 3 78, Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves
@@RafanFarooquib Why do I need to explain that? Did you even watch the video? They distort the meanings (3:78) *and* they distort the actual words themselves (2:79). Why is it a contradiction for them to do *both?* The only issue is people like David Wood making it seem like *all* the Quran is accusing them of is distorting the meanings, but that is just patently false, so who cares?
@@Jason-Skywalker understandable his fans will just think you were saying gibberish and say "stoobid abdool" every 5 seconds But what about your next video
Another great example of the quran correcting the bible is that the bible says that Solomon worshiped idols. The quran corrects this by saying "Solomon did not disbelieve". You'd have do be deluded to think that this was not intentional.
David loves to quote Hadiths out of context when they seem to be in his favour. But then simultaneously ignores Hadiths as clear as Buhari 7363: Narrated Ubaidullah: Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!" How much clearer does it get?
@@RafanFarooquib My question is simple enough for anyone who understands English. Is English Language your first language? Let me try again: Regarding the Hadith quoted above from Sahih Bukhari, is that hadith the words of Ibn Abbas or the words of Muhammad or the words of Allah? That's a very simple question!
@@kenid4144 David Said that the original early scholars of Islam believed that the Torah and the Injeel were not corrupted. This shows that David lied, Scholars and companions of the Prophet all had the unanimous verdict that the Torah and the Injeel were in fact corrupted. Why? you may ask. Because this is exactly what the Qur'an says. 2:75 Do you ˹believers still˺ expect them to be true to you, though a group of them would hear the word of Allah then knowingly corrupt it after understanding it? 2:79 So woe to those who distort the Scripture with their own hands then say, “This is from Allah”-seeking a fleeting gain! So woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they have earned. 4:44 Have you ˹O Prophet˺ not seen those who were given a portion of the Scriptures yet trade it for misguidance and wish to see you deviate from the ˹Right˺ Path? 6:91 And they have not shown Allah His proper reverence when they said, “Allah has revealed nothing to any human being.” Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Who then revealed the Book brought forth by Moses as a light and guidance for people, which you split into separate sheets-revealing some and hiding much? You have been taught ˹through this Quran˺ what neither you nor your forefathers knew. 3:78 There are some among them who distort the Book with their tongues to make you think this ˹distortion˺ is from the Book-but it is not what the Book says. They say, “It is from Allah”-but it is not from Allah. And ˹so˺ they attribute lies to Allah knowingly.
So all of that just for David to recognize that the Quran does say that Jews and Christians distorted their Scriptures (with both their tongues and hands as several verses make clear)? This is really his strongest argument? I want those 20 minutes back David.
@@johnonymous1592why would the Quran say the Torah doesn’t exist when we believe the Torah was given to the prophet Moses (PBUH)?? Also no where in the Quran does it say the Jews have the same Torah from the 7th century (please find the verse for me) we believe the Jews don’t have the original text, it was changed and corrupted, I believe the oldest Jewish texts are the Dead Sea scrolls which came approximately 1700 - 2000 years after Moses so just how reliable could that be only God knows
David cannot find any Christian suitable to support him. Christian Princess will not show himself, he’s not on good terms with Scam Shamoun so Apuss is good enough😂
Christian speaking, atheist nodding head , this combination is legit amusing. I mean how can they have a common ground.. islamophoby became a religion that can get people together.. the guys literally have a career being anti islam..
Alhamdullilah - Allah granted Farid with great knowledge and rhetorical skills 13:30 "However I am not granting you that" Basically Farid is saying, that no matter what evidence is presented, I'll ignore it and just stick to what presuppositions I've already adhered to! Mashallah 🙌
The most embarrassing thing is that the Christian apologists always say that, 'Quran somehow affirms the Bible'. But it doesn't! Read: "So woe to those who write the "scripture" *with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah,"* in order to exchange it for a small price. *Woe to them for what their hands have written* and woe to them for what they earn." Quran 2:79 Not to mention the compilation of Masoretic text on which *King James Bible* is based on, was compiled *400 years after prophet Muhammed* [Peace be upon him].
"no one can change the words of Allah". The bible is written by people from beginning to end. And it's been changed up and down, right and left from the time it was written. Torah and Ingil are NOT the old and new testament, respectively.
Is this their best argument?? Looool we literally destroyed their book preservation, their pagan origin of the trinity, the absolute contradictions in their books ..ect Yet this is their best argument?? Wow
@@Oy10n I was actually interested to hear if he had a solid refutation. And non- surprisingly he didn't. Instead he said: 13:30 "However I am not granting you that" Basically Farid is saying, that no matter what evidence is presented, I'll ignore it and just stick to what presuppositions I've already adhered to!
Farid brother, it seems you already understand where the truth is, I think that you don’t need to prove anything, you need to have courage and accept Him as a savior, he is waiting and knocking at the door!
QURAN & SCRIPTURES OF 7TH CENTURY ARABIA: The Quran was not addressing the biblical scripture available today. The Quran addressed the oral and scriptural traditions of the Jewish and Christian tribes and clans inhabiting the 7th Century Arabian Peninsula which included Mandaeans, Manichaeans, Collyridians, various Gnostic sects, Trinitarians, Rabbinical Jewish sects as well as the idol worshippers. These traditions differed widely from the canonical texts accepted into Christianity and Judaism. These religions and their texts were in a state of flux. The differences became more acute as interpretations steeped in Western hellenism were imposed on these Middle Eastern scriptures, which were already imbued with hellenism due to more than 900 years of occupation by the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Romans. Add to this the prior influence of the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians and the Persians, the Biblical texts are filled with 'foreign' cultural and linguistic influence, both from the ANE and the West. That is why these texts are so interesting to explore. The Quran has preserved the oral and written traditions of 7th Century Arabian Christians and Jews. This preservation sheds light on the religious traditions that had not yet come under the influence of Rabbinic and Roman attempts at orthodoxy. It is absolutely amazing how the Quran addresses the issues of the Christian and Jewish tribes from their own perspective, so as not to offend members of these sects, but have them focus on the monotheism presented in their own texts. The Quran is amazing!!! It is the prime example of how to approach religious beliefs from an understanding and tolerant point of view. Quran 16:125 says: " Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knows best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance. SOME 7th CENTURY CHRISTIAN DOCTRINES ADDRESSED IN THE QURAN: The beliefs of these sects in 7th Century Arabia are referenced in the Quran as the Mandaean name for John the Baptist which was Yahia Yahona (Yahya in the Quran) and the Manichaean Docetic doctrine which states that Jesus was a spirit and not flesh and blood. The Quran addresses this issue in Quran 3:59: Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allāh1 is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was." So, Jesus is like Adam, in other words, they were both flesh and blood human beings. Another doctrine is the trinitarian doctrine which addressed in Quran 4:171: "O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs." Mandaean doctrine is addressed in Quran 2:138: (As for) Sibghah Allah which Sibghah can be better than Allah's? And we are His worshippers." Sibghah is a Mandaean ritual in which the believer is immersed 3 times in flowing water, like a river. The Mandaeans, known as Subghah in Iraq, were known for this ritual. In this verse, Allah is referring to immersion in Islam, the religion of Allah rather than the watery Mandaean ritual. Collyridians were Mary worshippers. This worship is addressed in 5:116: And [beware the Day] when Allāh will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allāh?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen."
@Johnonymous: Heretics??? According to who, the Roman Church??? The multitude of 7th Century Christians who did not subscribe to the Church of Rome condemned the church 'canonized gospels' as well as their 'ecclesiastical' doctrines as heretical. The Quran does not condemn these Christians as heretics and future denizens of hell as did the Roman Church. The Quran presents these various Christians doctrines as deviations from the primacy of the core biblical belief expressed in the first of the ten commandments that ALLAH IS ONE. According to Quran 9:31: "They take their rabbis and their monks for their masters apart from Allah, and also the Messiah, son of Mary, whereas they were commanded to worship none but the One True God. There is no god but He. Exalted be He above those whom they associate with Him in His Divinity." In other words, the Quran presents a commonly held Abrahamic belief in the oneness of God and then presents church doctrines as contradictions to this belief.
Your confusion explains why you're probably a Muslim. You dont seem to realise that if your dawah guys had their ways, they will unalive both guys thats why they team up against political Izlam
@@kenid4144 Name 1 war in modern history started by Muslims? WW1 started by Europeans WW2 started by Europeans Invasion of Vietnam Invasion of Iraq You name it. You Hindus should close your accounts lol. If you believe in a monkey god who swallowed the sun you should not have the right to type anything
@@kenid4144explain this then and He does not forbid you to deal kindly and justly with anyone who has not fought you for your faith or driven you out of your homes: God loves the just. Surah al mumtahenah chapter 60 verse 8 Allah only forbids you from befriending those who have fought you for ˹your˺ faith, driven you out of your homes, or supported ˹others˺ in doing so. And whoever takes them as friends, then it is they who are the ˹true˺ wrongdoers. Surah al mumtahenah chapter 60 verse 9 As for those who have honoured the treaty you made with them and who have not supported anyone against you: fulfil your agreement with them to the end of their term. God loves those who are mindful of Him. Surah al tawbah chapter 9 verse 4 If any one of the idolaters should seek your protection [Prophet], grant it to him so that he may hear the word of God, then take him to a place safe for him, for they are people with no knowledge [of it]. Surah al tawbeh chapter 9 verse 6 But if they incline towards peace, you [Prophet] must also incline towards it, and put your trust in God: He is the All Hearing, the All Knowing. Surah al anfal chapter 8 verse 61 Fight in God’s cause against those who fight you, but do not overstep the limits: God does not love those who overstep the limits. Surah al baqarah chapter 2 verse 190
Seems like farid's response went over your head......it is hard for you to understand because you have an pre assumption that the current torah and bible are from god where it clearly isnt..... people wrote things with their own hand and attributed to god.....but does it mean that god's word is changed!!...for example if god says you will go to hell if you steal then you will....no matter if someone distorts the scripture and says that "you wont go to hell if you steal"..... basically it would become the words of man attributed to god not "word of god" My honest advice: you seem like a sincere person otherwise you wont be here....you actually cared about the answer to the argument instead of blindly believing it....so i would urge you to look into islam with a open heart!! And i am pretty sure god willingly you will find the truth
@@ampere37 You and Farid have a pre assumption that David is speaking only of the "present" Torah and Injil. Copies of the Torah and Gospel still exist today before Mohammeds time. In Mohamed's time, he and the Quran said there are certain things CURRENTLY written in the Gospel and Torah. No one ever found what Mohammed and the Quran claimed was written in the Gospel and Torah. There are copies of the Torah and Gospel, before Mohammeds time, during Mohameds time, and after Mohammeds time. None say what the Quran and Mohammed claimed it did. & the excuse from modern Muslims as to why that is, "Bible been Corrupted". Muslims don't come to the logical conclusion that the Quran and Mohammed simply made mistakes. They jump through hoops, twisting, and distorting everything to defend their faith
@@ampere37 Go read the tasfir of Ibn Kathir on that Quran verse you referenced Ibn Kathir Tasfir, Quran 3 78, "Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed"
Example 2 is a joke response legit he complaining about text and translation but his book has that at least we still have original language to look back to unlike his book if he believes this argument if he was sincere mean that he won’t believe the Bible yet he does
Why? We already see David, despite watching videos in his own time strawmans Farid and isn't an honest person. We have also seen him destroyed by the likes of Hijab and Sheikh Uthman. The only reason he wants Farid on would be to get his numbers up and get the money rolling in.
@@WelcomeToTheRezvolution Destroyed by Hijab? The guy who doesn't know the meaning of Elijah and says Allah prays for, not to Muhammad? Destroyed by Uthman? The guy who denied apostasy laws and lied about jizyah?
@@kenid4144 Yes. Destroyed. Saw with our own eyes. David was destroyed by Uthman that even Sam Shamoun criticised David Wood. Going back 3 times and getting embarrassed. Hijab was confronted on saying prays and he said "praise". I know you guys have problems with hearing and words, but that's your own problem.
@@WelcomeToTheRezvolution Uthman only lied his way throughout the 3 episodes. Some Muslims exposed his deceptive tactics towards David. Sam was only critical that David gave room for Uthman to lie and slip away without being tough on him. Hijab is clearly a liar. How could say he said "Allah praise for Muhammad". That doesn't make sense, but he knows his gullible Muslim followers will believe him.
Hey Farid instead of the video response war that you choose to engage in with David and AP, why don't you come on their show? They invited you several times.
It takes critical thinking to understand how farid is contradicting himself 😂 to solve the whole argument bro the Qur'an is correcting and not comfirming the previous scripture that is according to the real quranic terms and interpretation. Anyone interested can check that as a hypothesis on their own.
@@koppite9600 I mean he abolished the law James the brother of Jesus didn't like that idea and he deferred with Saint Peter about weather Christianity should be for the Jews or all people he reformed Christianity everything up
@@KalliKall-r7n He took the matter to Peter and Peter sided with Paul. Peter was the one with authority to make binding decisions as per Mathew 16 17 19 where Jesus gave him the Keys of Heaven and whatever Peter decided was law. Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church. So, where's your case here?
Assalamu Alaykum akhy, are you planning to respond to abdullah sameer and his friend gandal about the video « taqqiya of farid respond part2 » because they respond a while ago to the epilepsy serie that you made. Baaraka allahu fik
@@FaridResponds To be honest I didnt watch it all it was like 2 hours long they were going through all your videos, I thought you were going to make a video to answer them, that's why I asked
@@FaridResponds ok baaraka allahu fik I see that they didnt even respond to that one. However I have a question they are saying that we cannot take the testimony of Ali hearing rocks talking too because of his young age (im talking about the case of when they said that Prophet Muhammad sallallahu aleyhi wasalam was epileptic/crazy by hearing rocks but even Ali heard it so their claim doesnt make sense), they said that we dont take the testimony of Ali (when shia claiming it) and taking instead Abu Bakr as the first muslim. How can we respond to that, is it because of a lack of evidence (for accepting Ali as the first believer) and not because of: we reject his testimoy because of his young age?
@@FaridResponds ok baaraka allahu fik I see that they didnt even respond to that one. However I have a question they are saying that we cannot take the testimony of Ali hearing rocks talking too because of his young age (im talking about the case of when they said that Prophet Muhammad sallallahu aleyhi wasalam was epileptic/crazy by hearing rocks but even Ali heard it so their claim doesnt make sense), they said that we dont take the testimony of Ali (when shia claiming it) and taking instead Abu Bakr as the first muslim. How can we respond to that, is it because of a lack of evidence (for accepting Ali as the first believer) and not because of: we reject his testimoy because of his young age?
THE 5TH & FINAL COVENANT, THE COVENANT OF ISLAM (SHALOM IN HEBREW), IS FOUND IN THE BIBLE: The Biblical covenants are: the Covenant of Noah, the Covenant of Abraham, the Covenant of Moses & Aaron, the Covenant of David and the Covenant of Islam. Islam (Shalom in Hebrew) is the 5th and final covenant that God made with those who obey his laws. This covenant of peace was given to the descendants of Aaron in Numbers 25:12 and the descendants of David in Isaiah and Ezekiel. According to Numbers 25:12: “Behold I give him my covenant of Shalom (Islam in Arabic)”. Isaiah 54:10 says: Though the mountains be shaken and the hills be removed, yet my unfailing love for you will not be shaken nor my covenant of Shalom/Islam be removed,” says the Lord, who has compassion on you.” Ezekiel 34:25 says: “I will make a covenant of Shalom/Islam with them and rid the land of savage beasts so that they may live in the wilderness and sleep in the forests in safety.” Ezekiel 37:26 sats: “I will make a covenant of Shalom/Islam with them; it will be an everlasting covenant. I will establish them and increase their numbers, and I will put my sanctuary among them forever.” The covenant promised to Aaron, that of a perpetual priesthood which would abide in peace, and the covenant given to David, that a patrilineal descendant of David would reign in peace forever from Jerusalem, were to be fulfilled in Jesus. According to Jesus’ genealogy in the gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus’ father, Joseph, was a descendant of David and Jesus’ mother, Mary, was a descendant of Aaron (Luke 1:36). However, the Jews refused to follow Jesus, so the final covenant of Islam was transferred to Bani Ishmael when Muhammad was appointed as Allah’s Prophet. According to the Quran 61:16: Jesus foretold Muhammad as ‘the Praised One’: “And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, “O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is the Praised One (Ahmad in Arabic).” But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, “This is obvious magic.” Jesus foretold of Ahmad/Muhammad when he quoted to the Jews Psalm 118: 26 in Matt 23:39 & Luke 13:35: “Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time comes when ye shall say, “The Praised One (Ahmad/Muhammad in Arabic) is he that comes in the name of the Lord.” In other words, the Mosaic and Davidic covenants which the Messiah was to fulfill, would be cancelled and the covenant of Islam would be transferred to the Praised One (Ahmad/Muhammad) who came ‘in the name of’ God or Allah. Luke 13:35 confirms Matthew 21:43 in which Jesus says that the kingdom of God would be taken from the Jews and given to another nation. “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit.” So, the houses of Aaron (the priesthood) and David (kingdom of Judah) remained desolate and expelled from Jerusalem until Omar ibn Khattab restored the Christian expelled Jews to Jerusalem in 637 CE.
Those who follow the Messenger (Mohammed), the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them (7:157 MP). And when there cometh unto them (Jews) a Scripture (the Qur'an) from Allah, confirming that in their possession (2:89 MP).
![Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zgHtmG55-w0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]](/img/tr.png)
Why does David Wood even bother anymore? His desperate attempts never made a difference 30 years ago or today
all his moral arguments have crumbled because he is a Bible believing Christian, he literally has nothing new to offer except recycled arguments ♻️🤦♂️
For the God of cash
@@elyasahmadzai2I would always call David Wood a secret atheist secular liberal 😂
@elyasahmadzai2 how can he be a bible believing Christian when he throws his religion under the bus for liberalism at every opportunity?
It has made difference which is why the refutations are important. Many in the West have very little knowledge of Islam
An atheist and a Christian get together in the struggle to turn people away from the worship of one true God... this is a strange time line.
I'm even confused about how they can be friends
In the past Christians burned atheists at the stake
@@_unknown123. Funny how that's in the past. Apostates now still get killed in Islamic countries.
Both of Them Take Money as Their God so Not Really Strange
You wouldn't understand. You believe all nonbelievers are your enemies.
They are just clowns entertaining the Hindus and Zionazis
Excellent response by brother Farid as usual. He absolutely decimates these same old tired and stale regurgitated nonsense that Wood and his little sidekick spew.
It is clear that these guys have nothing of substance to bring towards Muslims.
May Allah reward the brother for having the patience to sit through the videos of these irritating guys
They are not muslims why would they bring anything of substance to you?
if they had nothing of substance to bring, farid wouldnt be desperately trying to refute them even after all these years ;-)
These guys don’t know what it means to be productive. They think he’s just finding some random guy nobody cares about and debunking them for no reason. That’s why Muslims don’t watch these videos.
@@chantjelly6773 if you werent such a dummy then you would know that Farid makes these videos for the lay public who wouldnt know any better about the trashy stuff they bring
Yeah I think you highlighted the main point...Farid is very patient MashaaAllaah. Bahrain people bro...Bahrain people. They seem very down to earth. David, on the other hand, doesn't come off as any Christian I would ever chill with. No God fearing Christian is that arrogant.
Speaks volumes of how corrupt christianity is - when their "scholars" closest ally in trying to attack Islam is an Atheist. Like imagine that... he has to team up with a person that mocks god to try and prove christianity is true?
I don't think Wood is a scholar of Christianity
You wouldn't get it. Everyone who is a kuffar is an enemy according to you.
@@crustykeycap5670 Lmao I never said that... and no the Qur'an does not state that. I am saying how idiotic it is that he has to adopt atheistic morality and viewpoints as well as purposely misconstrue whatever Islam says to portray Islam is bad. You literally saw it in the video - how david wood literally ignored what Farid said and went off and talked about something else. What I am tryna say is -- it's absurd to see this "Christian" link arms with a "atheist" (who are also kuffar by Christian text). Like how could you believe this man is christian - he might as well be atheist.
@@crustykeycap5670 did you pull that conclusion out of your 🍑
@@crustykeycap5670 lol, missing the point
Why can't these so-called Christians argue based on Christian ethics instead of secular liberal ethics? Why do they argue using an atheist framework instead of a Christian framework? The answer: they have nothing to stand on in the modern world, they let their faith get watered down and corrupted, and now for supposed believers, their closest buddies are atheists that regularly mock God.
David calling this bizarre and flawed argument "the best argument against Islam" is probably his Fool's Errand at this point 😅
I'm afraid I don't understand Farid's response, though. Does the Qur'an not refer to the Scriptures the Christians and Jews had with them at the time as authoratitive? That is, it refers to them as accurate in the present (at the time) tense? We have copies of those Scriptures, and they match the ones from both before and after the time of Mohammed - did I somehow miss when Farid explained that they are not affirming currently (at the time, which matches both earlier and later manuscripts) available Scripture?
What?@@lukecox6317
@@lukecox6317nope absolutely not
U have been deluded
But whatever David will bring this point in response to this video
Then Farid will refute it
@@MohammadIrfan-v8q this is my point though - WHEN did Farid refute it? All the language the Qur'an uses when talking about the Injil and Tawrah imply a presently exiting and accessible text that is never implied to be flawed. When it contradicts what they say it never says it is correcting them, which implies it is claiming to be citing them.
@@lukecox6317 give the verse
Farid didn't refute it because the video didn't contain the argument....
Where from where did u get this idea that they are not flawed?
0:00 Intro
0:13 Some grown adults acting like clowns
2:16 Farid makes a point
2:50 David strawman
3:29 Farid makes a point
4:00 David strawman
4:51 Farid makes a point
5:26 David strawman
6:24 Fans calling out David for being money greedy
6:54 David makes a claim without proof
7:24 David repeats his meme card argument w/ response
8:43 “I believe in thee and in Him who revealed thee” w/ response
9:43 “They have the tawrah and injeel with them” w/ response
10:45 Another point w/ response
12:11 The Qur’ān is familiar with very small details within previous scriptures
14:25 David misquotes the Qur’ān!!
15:32 David exhibits severe ignorance about the Qur’ān although this is his favourite argument topic
16:39 David proposes a strange commentary on a Hadith- however the full Hadith is Sahīh al Bukharī 7363 which is even more explicit and unequivocal in corruption
Islamic Dilemma?❌
I like to read my nonsense into the quran dilemma with no knowledge of Islamic faith ✅
That sounds right...not to mention not bringing any new knowledge. This means they are not reading new books or learning more. That is never good for even your intellect, forget your faith.
@@ARmirzaful David wood is still the same person after all these years
Mohammad Hijab ended his career
“What career?” 🤫
@@elyasahmadzai2 😂 david’s career consist of google searches. Shaykh Uthman humiliated him as well, when will David learn 🤣
@@hungaman1he’s not called a google scholar for no reason
@@elyasahmadzai2
Damn 💀🔥
That was 5 years ago and David Wood has only gotten more popular since then. So it seems like Hijab gave Wood's career a nice boost. Keep coping :)
Apus just sitting there like a robot saying nothing, looking at nothing. Does he even know what he’s doing anymore. 😂
He’s just here to collect the Hindu superchat lmao 😂
You guys are so pained that you resort to ad hominens. Shame!
@@kenid4144 Projection much ?
@@dedswift Aren't you pained? That Farid is looking like a little boy trying to respond to his critics, but doing a poor job with that.
@@kenid4144 Ad Hominem occurs when you direct an argument against a person INSTEAD of the said person's position. In this case, Farid has already dealt with David's position, so criticizing Ridwan doesn't mean that OP or others in this thread are committing the ad hominem fallacy.
This was a complete embarrasment for david, reminds me of old times! I really hope this saga continues.
When David Wood embarrassed Hijab admitting the Allah prays FOR the prophet. And he doesn’t even know what Immanenuel and Elijah mean he’s a joke
@@joseduarte2146
Okay.. and all the other times that David burnt that wood bastard? What about that? Oh yeah! We turn a blind eye!
Muhammad Hijab is neither a scholar of Islam, neither does his views change the whole theology of Islam. Allah does not pray to anyone, the "prayer" you talk about is "blessings" that Allah sends upon prophet Muhammad.
@@joseduarte2146😂😂😂 What are you on mate? Have you even heard Hijab's response. That was the epic moment when David got a free Arabic lesson.
Christians literally confronted Hijab on this in Speakers Corner. He said not only do they have a problem understanding Quran but also a hearing issue. He said praise and not prays
@@joseduarte2146I want whatever ur smoking bro😂😂
Nightmares for Islamophobes:
1) Mufti Yasir Nadeem Al wajidi (Urdu/Hindi)
2) Abuzar Responds (Urdu/Hindi)
3) Awaz E Haq (Urdu/Hindi)
4) Zaid Patel (Urdu/Hindi)
5) Qaiser Ahmed Raja (Urdu/English)
6) Smile2Jannah (Urdu/English)
7) Islamic Awakening (Urdu/Hindi)
8) The Muslim Lantern (English)
9) Elaina Ali (Urdu/Hindi)**[for females]
10) Ali Dawah (English)
11) Daniel Haqiqatjoe (English)
12) Sapiens Institute (English)
13) Uthman Ibn Farooq (Urdu/English)
14) Suboor Ahmed (English)
15) Hamza Tzortzis (English)
16) Brother Dawah (Urdu/Hindi)
17) Brother Rahul (Bengali/Urdu)
18) Mufti Abdullah Minhaj (Urdu/Hindi)
19) Dawah Over Dunya (English)
20) IRPC India (Urdu/Hindi)
21) Dawah Wise (English)
22) Muhammad Hijab (English)
23) Asim Iftekhar (Urdu/Hindi)
24) Basalat Adam (Urdu/Hindi)
25) Farid Responds (English)
26) Abdullah Al Andalusi (English)
27) Thought adventure podcast (English)
28) Muslim cowboy (English)
29) Hamza's den (English)
30) The3muslims (English)
31) Answering Christians 1 (English)
32) Alhaarith Islamic TV (English)
33) Imran hussein epistemix (English)
34) The muslim metaphysician (English)
35) SYFEtalk (English)
36) Dawah2soul (English)
37) Zaid patel (Urdu/Hindi)
Sahil Adeem and Engineer Muhammad Ali mIRZA
رامي عيسي
وليد اسماعيل
اشرف غريب
ابو عمر الباحث
محمود داود
عبدالله رشدي
هيثم طلعت
عمرو نور الدين
Dude you forgot Apuss
@@Lilcousinbruva323 yep clowns are not important 🤡👎
@@shaiksarfraz7946 They are important if we want to duplicate more clowns to see how many clowns there are.
Subhanallah how much time they spend trying to debunk Islam but he still the fastest growing religion by convertion
What is your source?
@@tintinismybelgian pew and every other polling data you can possibly find; it's the only religion with a net+ conversion rate. Why ask?
Their clowshow being called out and EXPOSED even among their own community is amazing stuff to see. not serious individuals
May Allah reward you
6:25 Look how mature and respectful the commenter was compared to David's childish replies. Is that how a man of God / follower of Jesus should behave like? And CP is much worse. I hope Christians wake up and realize they're idolizing the wrong people.
Left Christianity, alhamdulillah for the correct deen
Then Jesus will deny you on the Judgment day.
@@NCSiebertdesign Jesus will deny the workers of lawlessness.
Jesus came to uphold the Law and fulfill it not to abolish totally.
Matthew 7:23 ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
Were you a born again Christian?
@@letmetalk2240 I thought muslims believe bible are corrupted. Your words against yourselves.
Muslims are example of lawlessness, because they abrogated everything Jesus said and laws God given to Moses.
@@NCSiebertdesignoh nooooo😢😢😢
Apuss gotta be top 10 meat rider of all time 😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bro does not even now what he is doing here bro don’t even know that he is a atheist anymore 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
He has no dignity
Maybe he is his secret boyfriend who knows🤔
I mean David aka deepus does like to cross dress so you might be onto something here XD @@abdemouaouia8396
The top of the list is little 9 year old Aisha 👩🏾👴🏻
@@mrcombustiblelemon2902 you think you did something right now? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 do Cristians think after bringing these things they did something 😂😂😂😂😂😂 you can’t defend your weak religion barely anyone of you cristians bring claims against Islam with sincerity I onsl know a handful of people you are probably a Cristian who think that I and the father are one proves that Jesus is God
May ALLAH give you a life of aafiyah,
And reward you in this duniya and akhirah,
Make dua for me,
Allah make me a muttaqi.
May allah reward you, my brother Farid , and continue exposing the lies of these fraudsters
السلام على من اتبع الهدى
you're the best example of quality over quantity farid !!!
@@cocoalfaridah5831 your questions are all non sequitors. It was called canaan first. And the cananites are the modern palestinians as proven by dna testing and carbon dating. People lived there you imb.ecile. that s a historical fact. It s even in the old testament 🤣🤣. Guess who never lived there: european jews.
Now it s my turn:
Why do old bibles prior to 1948 have palestine on a map with the borders that the occupier has set for himself today???
Isnt that weird? Why did herzl call it palestine in 1880s his own book that founded zionism?
Why did the current occupier acknowledge the land before when you dont???
Go ahead. Answer it. You can.t
Great response Farid, this troubled me for some time. Thank you 🫡
Jesus was a Muslim.
He spread Islam.
Where do Christians come from?
@@koppite9600Paul
I'm a little tired of our muslim brothers giving Wood and Apuss so much attention. Yes, it's fun sometimes to expose their nonsense. But honestly, I think talking about dumb and dumber is keeping us from greater things.
Yea but someone had to do it
Nah Bruh Those Response its Only for that Muslim that Have weak Faith or Imaan so its good
I would agree with you but after seeing how many people listen to them and guys like chritsian prince , sometimes i think response videos are necessary
Dumb and Dumber, good one brother
@@lynackhilou4865 Projecting? 😅 We know all your dawah guys online are clowns. From Yasir Qadhi to Zakir Naik to Hamzas den....that why we listen to people who expose what your dawah guys hide.
✮✮✮ *Your channel is a great example of how hard work and dedication can pay off* ✮✮✮🤩✌🏼
I think he is also gifted with a truly amazing brain. He never takes anything personally...he only addresses the arguments of the other side, no matter how low they go. Emotional maturity is amazing. I am very jealous lol. :)
@@ARmirzaful 🤩✌🏼
Master of red herring fallacy
16:50 That’s actually not the full saying of ibn Abbas… in Sahih al-Bukhari 7363, ibn Abbas literally says: “Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and ALLAH HAS TOLD YOU that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) CHANGED THEIR SCRIPTURE AND DISTORTED IT, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!"… So he clearly says that they distorted their books and changed it. How clear is that?!
False.
Abbas meant some interpretations and meanings were distorted, and new revelations were false. The Torah or Gospel itself was never tampered with
Tasfir Ibn Kathir 3 78,
Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves
Ibn Abbas, the person you referenced said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed."
According Abbas, the Torah and Injil are perfectly persevered
@@hcro5Did you even read what you quoted? The last line? "That people misguided others by addition and false interpretation relying on books that they wrote themselves?" And Todays Bible is not words of Allah, Rather its words of Unknown People. And You dont know where injil is? ie revelation of Allah to Jesus pbuh. Also I didnt found this hadith but still it doesnt incline with what you wanna prove. And the hadith that is quoted above is Authentic. This clearly smashes your claim.
@@hcro5
Yes, the people of the book added verses claiming they are from god when they are not… We can say that the ORIGINAL Torah and Gospel did not change… Our point still stands.
@@hcro5problem is, those two 'books' (or recitation, since back then people still write on stones and leathers) are no longer in this world...
so yes by definition it can't be changed by 'a creation' anymore.
6:29 this was actually sickening to read. David was being so rude and obnoxious to someone making valid and respectful criticism. He even apologised but David just insults him more 😑
He has the nerve to call him a narcissist even tho taking criticism poorly and acting defensive is literally a symptom of narcissism 🤦♀️
بارك الله فيكم...
اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين..
اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم..
رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين...
لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين.....
.'''''..''''''
in fact, the hadith that ibn abbas narrated shows the previous books are distorted but Quran is recent pure undistorted.
Alhamdu'lillah. Brother
Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb. What a team of buffoons 😂😂!!
Like the guys on EFDawah...buffoons and clown dawah guys
JazakAllah'u khairan brother
It is telling you something when an atheist and a Christian are helping hand, trying their best to disprove Islam. But Islam will prevail. Islam the unconquerable the unfallen.
Alhamdulillah you exist. May Allah bless you, for sure i would fall into kuffr if you wouldn't be here. Dont stop with the Refutings to these Ahlal Kitabis
This is so sad,you're desperate for attention you spam this everywhere even when its not relevant @@cocoalfaridah5831
Good to see someone responding to David clown and his Pinocchio friend 😂😂😂😂
16:43
David proving *once more* his determination to avoid the obvious.
Narrated Ubaidullah:
Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, *and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain.* Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!"
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 7363
In-book reference : Book 96, Hadith 90
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 9, Book 92, Hadith 461
Go ahead, David, continue to play dumb to your gulible audience who can't be bothered to think beyond your golf ball sized bubble. The only ones getting the laugh out of it are the Muslims.
bro can you answer this Tasfir Ibn Kathir 3 78,
Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves
@@RafanFarooquib Why do I need to explain that? Did you even watch the video? They distort the meanings (3:78) *and* they distort the actual words themselves (2:79). Why is it a contradiction for them to do *both?* The only issue is people like David Wood making it seem like *all* the Quran is accusing them of is distorting the meanings, but that is just patently false, so who cares?
Jason when will you ever make a series on cp
@sbevexlr848 I never made a series on CP and I don't plan on it. That's a waste of my time.
@@Jason-Skywalker understandable his fans will just think you were saying gibberish and say "stoobid abdool" every 5 seconds
But what about your next video
Another great example of the quran correcting the bible is that the bible says that Solomon worshiped idols. The quran corrects this by saying "Solomon did not disbelieve".
You'd have do be deluded to think that this was not intentional.
No the Quran verse is speaking about how Solomon didn't practice Sihr.
The Babylonian Talmud claims that Solomon was a master magician.
@@trollgegaelWell then i guess it would be referring to both
@@battekyake6107No it talks about Sihr in particular
@@trollgegael how do you know?
Watching this back-and-forth is like watching those clowns try to fight Farid with swords and he effortlessly beats them with a toothpick
David loves to quote Hadiths out of context when they seem to be in his favour. But then simultaneously ignores Hadiths as clear as Buhari 7363:
Narrated Ubaidullah:
Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!"
How much clearer does it get?
Is that a hadith of Muhammad? Or a revelation from Allah?
@@kenid4144read then you will understand 😊
@@kenid4144 want me to quote you verses explicitly from the Quran i don't wanna embarass you
@@RafanFarooquib My question is simple enough for anyone who understands English. Is English Language your first language?
Let me try again: Regarding the Hadith quoted above from Sahih Bukhari, is that hadith the words of Ibn Abbas or the words of Muhammad or the words of Allah?
That's a very simple question!
@@kenid4144
David Said that the original early scholars of Islam believed that the Torah and the Injeel were not corrupted. This shows that David lied, Scholars and companions of the Prophet all had the unanimous verdict that the Torah and the Injeel were in fact corrupted.
Why? you may ask. Because this is exactly what the Qur'an says.
2:75 Do you ˹believers still˺ expect them to be true to you, though a group of them would hear the word of Allah then knowingly corrupt it after understanding it?
2:79 So woe to those who distort the Scripture with their own hands then say, “This is from Allah”-seeking a fleeting gain! So woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they have earned.
4:44 Have you ˹O Prophet˺ not seen those who were given a portion of the Scriptures yet trade it for misguidance and wish to see you deviate from the ˹Right˺ Path?
6:91 And they have not shown Allah His proper reverence when they said, “Allah has revealed nothing to any human being.” Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Who then revealed the Book brought forth by Moses as a light and guidance for people, which you split into separate sheets-revealing some and hiding much? You have been taught ˹through this Quran˺ what neither you nor your forefathers knew.
3:78 There are some among them who distort the Book with their tongues to make you think this ˹distortion˺ is from the Book-but it is not what the Book says. They say, “It is from Allah”-but it is not from Allah. And ˹so˺ they attribute lies to Allah knowingly.
So all of that just for David to recognize that the Quran does say that Jews and Christians distorted their Scriptures (with both their tongues and hands as several verses make clear)?
This is really his strongest argument? I want those 20 minutes back David.
i think this wasn't a waste of time, contrast between Farid and the clown show is so stark - hope their viewers see this and find guidance
Also, two major versions of the Torah (including Samarian) contradict each other by over 4,000 words. What's David trying to say?
and yet your Quran never says the Torah doesn't exist, in fact it says the Jews had it the in the 7th century, and its the same one we have today.
@@johnonymous1592why would the Quran say the Torah doesn’t exist when we believe the Torah was given to the prophet Moses (PBUH)?? Also no where in the Quran does it say the Jews have the same Torah from the 7th century (please find the verse for me) we believe the Jews don’t have the original text, it was changed and corrupted, I believe the oldest Jewish texts are the Dead Sea scrolls which came approximately 1700 - 2000 years after Moses so just how reliable could that be only God knows
@@johnonymous1592 yet the Pentateuch was clearly not God's word revealed directly to Moses
David’s arguments are based on making assumptions, taking half facts and running with it to the ends of the earth with confidence 😂
These 2 randoms still trying to fight Islam?💀😂
Don't they get tired?
@@Xenor999 they get paid by zionazis and Hindus, so I’m not surprised
They Are Do it For Money tho Ex Muslim and Mis information of Islam its very Profitable Sadly
I dont understand why apuss is there lol. Does he just repeat what he says like some cheerleader?
I don’t think apuss knows what he’s doing anymore, he’s just there just to be there
@@bakhtiyarguseinov9402cuz he gets views lol. “Hello my devoted ilk, I have more filth for u to consume, plz donate and support the toxicity”
The dream team 😂
He really is Hammerhead always surprises me
سبحان الله
الله أكبر
David cannot find any Christian suitable to support him. Christian Princess will not show himself, he’s not on good terms with Scam Shamoun so Apuss is good enough😂
Christian speaking, atheist nodding head , this combination is legit amusing.
I mean how can they have a common ground.. islamophoby became a religion that can get people together.. the guys literally have a career being anti islam..
Great video Akhi
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
Alhamdullilah - Allah granted Farid with great knowledge and rhetorical skills
13:30 "However I am not granting you that"
Basically Farid is saying, that no matter what evidence is presented, I'll ignore it and just stick to what presuppositions I've already adhered to!
Mashallah 🙌
Delusional 😂
Excellent answered
The most embarrassing thing is that the Christian apologists always say that, 'Quran somehow affirms the Bible'. But it doesn't!
Read:
"So woe to those who write the "scripture" *with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah,"* in order to exchange it for a small price. *Woe to them for what their hands have written* and woe to them for what they earn." Quran 2:79
Not to mention the compilation of Masoretic text on which *King James Bible* is based on, was compiled *400 years after prophet Muhammed* [Peace be upon him].
At 10:45 Hes reading what is going to happen to himself and apus but he doesnt realise it, how ironic
والله لو انه بس درس الف ب ت لغة عربية كان ضحك على نفسه من ضعف الشبهات الي على باله هدمت الدين 😂
Those 2 are grown adults brothers and sisters
We need more videos ❤
I love this guys his video make me I can't stop 😂🤣it so funny
"no one can change the words of Allah". The bible is written by people from beginning to end. And it's been changed up and down, right and left from the time it was written. Torah and Ingil are NOT the old and new testament, respectively.
The pig noises always kills me 🤣 20:18
Only a matter of time until he ends up on Bubba’s barbecue grill.
@@PseudoSpaceMarineew no one would eat that thing
@@G06LlN Just kidding. Not even a crocodile would eat him.
Is this their best argument?? Looool we literally destroyed their book preservation, their pagan origin of the trinity, the absolute contradictions in their books ..ect
Yet this is their best argument?? Wow
Beshek Yo-yo you're deserve millions
of subscribers 🤧♥️
It's asif David and Apus were asking Farid to ridiculize them at this point. What a bunch of clowns these two are.
Atheist and christian in same panel fighting against islām.I can't make this 🤣🤡
He is targeting an audience that is intellectually bankrupt. He hopes no 1 fact checks him 😂
You're talking about Farid right?
@violentartist560
Farid has exposed you liars so bad
@@Oy10n Yes so bad... The power of Islam 👏
@violentartist560 it's power burns you that's why u are here lol
@@Oy10n I was actually interested to hear if he had a solid refutation. And non- surprisingly he didn't.
Instead he said:
13:30 "However I am not granting you that"
Basically Farid is saying, that no matter what evidence is presented, I'll ignore it and just stick to what presuppositions I've already adhered to!
Farid brother, it seems you already understand where the truth is, I think that you don’t need to prove anything, you need to have courage and accept Him as a savior, he is waiting and knocking at the door!
yes the Truth is Islam plus your comment is kinda of a threat I mean "he's knocking on the door" part scared me
QURAN & SCRIPTURES OF 7TH CENTURY ARABIA: The Quran was not addressing the biblical scripture available today. The Quran addressed the oral and scriptural traditions of the Jewish and Christian tribes and clans inhabiting the 7th Century Arabian Peninsula which included Mandaeans, Manichaeans, Collyridians, various Gnostic sects, Trinitarians, Rabbinical Jewish sects as well as the idol worshippers. These traditions differed widely from the canonical texts accepted into Christianity and Judaism. These religions and their texts were in a state of flux. The differences became more acute as interpretations steeped in Western hellenism were imposed on these Middle Eastern scriptures, which were already imbued with hellenism due to more than 900 years of occupation by the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Romans. Add to this the prior influence of the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians and the Persians, the Biblical texts are filled with 'foreign' cultural and linguistic influence, both from the ANE and the West. That is why these texts are so interesting to explore.
The Quran has preserved the oral and written traditions of 7th Century Arabian Christians and Jews. This preservation sheds light on the religious traditions that had not yet come under the influence of Rabbinic and Roman attempts at orthodoxy. It is absolutely amazing how the Quran addresses the issues of the Christian and Jewish tribes from their own perspective, so as not to offend members of these sects, but have them focus on the monotheism presented in their own texts. The Quran is amazing!!! It is the prime example of how to approach religious beliefs from an understanding and tolerant point of view. Quran 16:125 says: " Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knows best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.
SOME 7th CENTURY CHRISTIAN DOCTRINES ADDRESSED IN THE QURAN: The beliefs of these sects in 7th Century Arabia are referenced in the Quran as the Mandaean name for John the Baptist which was Yahia Yahona (Yahya in the Quran) and the Manichaean Docetic doctrine which states that Jesus was a spirit and not flesh and blood. The Quran addresses this issue in Quran 3:59: Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allāh1 is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was." So, Jesus is like Adam, in other words, they were both flesh and blood human beings. Another doctrine is the trinitarian doctrine which addressed in Quran 4:171: "O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs." Mandaean doctrine is addressed in Quran 2:138: (As for) Sibghah Allah which Sibghah can be better than Allah's? And we are His worshippers." Sibghah is a Mandaean ritual in which the believer is immersed 3 times in flowing water, like a river. The Mandaeans, known as Subghah in Iraq, were known for this ritual. In this verse, Allah is referring to immersion in Islam, the religion of Allah rather than the watery Mandaean ritual. Collyridians were Mary worshippers. This worship is addressed in 5:116: And [beware the Day] when Allāh will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allāh?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen."
@Johnonymous: Heretics??? According to who, the Roman Church??? The multitude of 7th Century Christians who did not subscribe to the Church of Rome condemned the church 'canonized gospels' as well as their 'ecclesiastical' doctrines as heretical. The Quran does not condemn these Christians as heretics and future denizens of hell as did the Roman Church. The Quran presents these various Christians doctrines as deviations from the primacy of the core biblical belief expressed in the first of the ten commandments that ALLAH IS ONE. According to Quran 9:31: "They take their rabbis and their monks for their masters apart from Allah, and also the Messiah, son of Mary, whereas they were commanded to worship none but the One True God. There is no god but He. Exalted be He above those whom they associate with Him in His Divinity." In other words, the Quran presents a commonly held Abrahamic belief in the oneness of God and then presents church doctrines as contradictions to this belief.
Nice thawb Akhi
Quran Surah 2:63 says all believers will go to heaven. How is this possible if Christians are worshipping a prophet as God?
I'm still confused as to why Apostate Prophet, an atheist, is always teaming up with DW
Your confusion explains why you're probably a Muslim. You dont seem to realise that if your dawah guys had their ways, they will unalive both guys thats why they team up against political Izlam
@@kenid4144
Name 1 war in modern history started by Muslims?
WW1 started by Europeans
WW2 started by Europeans
Invasion of Vietnam
Invasion of Iraq
You name it.
You Hindus should close your accounts lol.
If you believe in a monkey god who swallowed the sun you should not have the right to type anything
@@kenid4144explain this then
and He does not forbid you to deal kindly and justly with anyone who has not fought you for your faith or driven you out of your homes: God loves the just. Surah al mumtahenah chapter 60 verse 8
Allah only forbids you from befriending those who have fought you for ˹your˺ faith, driven you out of your homes, or supported ˹others˺ in doing so. And whoever takes them as friends, then it is they who are the ˹true˺ wrongdoers.
Surah al mumtahenah chapter 60 verse 9
As for those who have honoured the treaty you made with them and who have not supported anyone against you: fulfil your agreement with them to the end of their term. God loves those who are mindful of Him. Surah al tawbah chapter 9 verse 4
If any one of the idolaters should seek your protection [Prophet], grant it to him so that he may hear the word of God, then take him to a place safe for him, for they are people with no knowledge [of it].
Surah al tawbeh chapter 9 verse 6
But if they incline towards peace, you [Prophet] must also incline towards it, and put your trust in God: He is the All Hearing, the All Knowing.
Surah al anfal chapter 8 verse 61
Fight in God’s cause against those who fight you, but do not overstep the limits: God does not love those who overstep the limits.
Surah al baqarah chapter 2 verse 190
Very nice
Watch 12:10, thats David's argument
13:05, that is how Farid interprets David's argument
Farid does not even understand David's argument
Seems like farid's response went over your head......it is hard for you to understand because you have an pre assumption that the current torah and bible are from god where it clearly isnt..... people wrote things with their own hand and attributed to god.....but does it mean that god's word is changed!!...for example if god says you will go to hell if you steal then you will....no matter if someone distorts the scripture and says that "you wont go to hell if you steal"..... basically it would become the words of man attributed to god not "word of god"
My honest advice: you seem like a sincere person otherwise you wont be here....you actually cared about the answer to the argument instead of blindly believing it....so i would urge you to look into islam with a open heart!! And i am pretty sure god willingly you will find the truth
No, you don't understand Farid's response.
@@ampere37
You and Farid have a pre assumption that David is speaking only of the "present" Torah and Injil.
Copies of the Torah and Gospel still exist today before Mohammeds time.
In Mohamed's time, he and the Quran said there are certain things CURRENTLY written in the Gospel and Torah.
No one ever found what Mohammed and the Quran claimed was written in the Gospel and Torah.
There are copies of the Torah and Gospel, before Mohammeds time, during Mohameds time, and after Mohammeds time. None say what the Quran and Mohammed claimed it did.
& the excuse from modern Muslims as to why that is, "Bible been Corrupted".
Muslims don't come to the logical conclusion that the Quran and Mohammed simply made mistakes. They jump through hoops, twisting, and distorting everything to defend their faith
@@ampere37
Go read the tasfir of Ibn Kathir on that Quran verse you referenced
Ibn Kathir Tasfir, Quran 3 78,
"Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed"
@@hcro5 like what? Give an example
Love the oink oink outro.
Example 2 is a joke response legit he complaining about text and translation but his book has that at least we still have original language to look back to unlike his book if he believes this argument if he was sincere mean that he won’t believe the Bible yet he does
Suddenly one day you will hear that David reverted to Islam in-sha Allah.
🤨
Keep dreaming...😅
@@kenid4144 😁 Nope. I don’t want his crazy loser to revert to Islam, sorry. 😁
Who knows maybe he will, sometimes the worst can turn into the best
@@Lilcousinbruva323 Who knows maybe Farid will one day become a Christian, sometimes the worst can turn into the best.
Farid have a discussion with David Wood live
Watch Mohammed Hijab vs. david wood
Why? We already see David, despite watching videos in his own time strawmans Farid and isn't an honest person.
We have also seen him destroyed by the likes of Hijab and Sheikh Uthman.
The only reason he wants Farid on would be to get his numbers up and get the money rolling in.
@@WelcomeToTheRezvolution Destroyed by Hijab? The guy who doesn't know the meaning of Elijah and says Allah prays for, not to Muhammad?
Destroyed by Uthman? The guy who denied apostasy laws and lied about jizyah?
@@kenid4144 Yes. Destroyed. Saw with our own eyes. David was destroyed by Uthman that even Sam Shamoun criticised David Wood. Going back 3 times and getting embarrassed.
Hijab was confronted on saying prays and he said "praise". I know you guys have problems with hearing and words, but that's your own problem.
@@WelcomeToTheRezvolution Uthman only lied his way throughout the 3 episodes. Some Muslims exposed his deceptive tactics towards David. Sam was only critical that David gave room for Uthman to lie and slip away without being tough on him.
Hijab is clearly a liar. How could say he said "Allah praise for Muhammad". That doesn't make sense, but he knows his gullible Muslim followers will believe him.
Guys got a bunch of family issues in which cause him to need an outlet for his emotional issues
Nah He takes Money as Their God, he have Monetized Video on top of Patreon and any other else
David is so desperate to win the argument because he is struggling with fighting against the truth
So he needs to rely on this kind of nonsense
Hey Farid instead of the video response war that you choose to engage in with David and AP, why don't you come on their show? They invited you several times.
It takes critical thinking to understand how farid is contradicting himself 😂 to solve the whole argument bro the Qur'an is correcting and not comfirming the previous scripture that is according to the real quranic terms and interpretation. Anyone interested can check that as a hypothesis on their own.
Farid you live in their heads rent free 😂😂
apus sitting there constantly checking the donations😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 as if he is his wife or something
Like Hamza and other dawah guys do. They love money
@@kenid4144 but they make beneficial content unlike Apus lol
@@cunctator3401 Beneficial content like yajuj and majuj or Harut and Marut?
@@kenid4144 what are you talking about
If Jesus spread Islam, where did Christianity come from.
Ur typ of people selfishness
Paul
@@KalliKall-r7n
Paul was under the apostles, how did he take over?
@@koppite9600 I mean he abolished the law James the brother of Jesus didn't like that idea and he deferred with Saint Peter about weather Christianity should be for the Jews or all people he reformed Christianity everything up
@@KalliKall-r7n
He took the matter to Peter and Peter sided with Paul. Peter was the one with authority to make binding decisions as per Mathew 16 17 19 where Jesus gave him the Keys of Heaven and whatever Peter decided was law. Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church.
So, where's your case here?
I’m a proud ex Muslim
Ok
So?
Keep that attitude on the day of judgement
How many rakats in wudu ??
Oh really? Care to validate you really were a Muslim?
Assalamu Alaykum akhy, are you planning to respond to abdullah sameer and his friend gandal about the video « taqqiya of farid respond part2 » because they respond a while ago to the epilepsy serie that you made. Baaraka allahu fik
Wa alaykum alsalam. Specify an example and I'll respond here.
@@FaridResponds To be honest I didnt watch it all it was like 2 hours long they were going through all your videos, I thought you were going to make a video to answer them, that's why I asked
They are full of crap. Watch this:
ua-cam.com/video/VPFgBPflRX8/v-deo.html
@@FaridResponds ok baaraka allahu fik I see that they didnt even respond to that one. However I have a question they are saying that we cannot take the testimony of Ali hearing rocks talking too because of his young age (im talking about the case of when they said that Prophet Muhammad sallallahu aleyhi wasalam was epileptic/crazy by hearing rocks but even Ali heard it so their claim doesnt make sense), they said that we dont take the testimony of Ali (when shia claiming it) and taking instead Abu Bakr as the first muslim. How can we respond to that, is it because of a lack of evidence (for accepting Ali as the first believer) and not because of: we reject his testimoy because of his young age?
@@FaridResponds ok baaraka allahu fik I see that they didnt even respond to that one. However I have a question they are saying that we cannot take the testimony of Ali hearing rocks talking too because of his young age (im talking about the case of when they said that Prophet Muhammad sallallahu aleyhi wasalam was epileptic/crazy by hearing rocks but even Ali heard it so their claim doesnt make sense), they said that we dont take the testimony of Ali (when shia claiming it) and taking instead Abu Bakr as the first muslim. How can we respond to that, is it because of a lack of evidence (for accepting Ali as the first believer) and not because of: we reject his testimoy because of his young age?
Salam alaikum bro
Little piggy snorting at the end
Dovid 19
Assalamoalaikum warahmatullahiwabarkatuhu
Akhi ignore this guy what can you expect from a diagnosed Psychopath.
2:26
"you find Muslim Scholars differing in very minute matters"
3:17 ???
brother im confused...
he is saying that the minute differances are PRESURVED(keep in traditional text)
THE 5TH & FINAL COVENANT, THE COVENANT OF ISLAM (SHALOM IN HEBREW), IS FOUND IN THE BIBLE: The Biblical covenants are: the Covenant of Noah, the Covenant of Abraham, the Covenant of Moses & Aaron, the Covenant of David and the Covenant of Islam. Islam (Shalom in Hebrew) is the 5th and final covenant that God made with those who obey his laws. This covenant of peace was given to the descendants of Aaron in Numbers 25:12 and the descendants of David in Isaiah and Ezekiel. According to Numbers 25:12: “Behold I give him my covenant of Shalom (Islam in Arabic)”. Isaiah 54:10 says: Though the mountains be shaken and the hills be removed, yet my unfailing love for you will not be shaken nor my covenant of Shalom/Islam be removed,” says the Lord, who has compassion on you.” Ezekiel 34:25 says: “I will make a covenant of Shalom/Islam with them and rid the land of savage beasts so that they may live in the wilderness and sleep in the forests in safety.” Ezekiel 37:26 sats: “I will make a covenant of Shalom/Islam with them; it will be an everlasting covenant. I will establish them and increase their numbers, and I will put my sanctuary among them forever.”
The covenant promised to Aaron, that of a perpetual priesthood which would abide in peace, and the covenant given to David, that a patrilineal descendant of David would reign in peace forever from Jerusalem, were to be fulfilled in Jesus. According to Jesus’ genealogy in the gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus’ father, Joseph, was a descendant of David and Jesus’ mother, Mary, was a descendant of Aaron (Luke 1:36). However, the Jews refused to follow Jesus, so the final covenant of Islam was transferred to Bani Ishmael when Muhammad was appointed as Allah’s Prophet.
According to the Quran 61:16: Jesus foretold Muhammad as ‘the Praised One’: “And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, “O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is the Praised One (Ahmad in Arabic).” But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, “This is obvious magic.”
Jesus foretold of Ahmad/Muhammad when he quoted to the Jews Psalm 118: 26 in Matt 23:39 & Luke 13:35: “Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time comes when ye shall say, “The Praised One (Ahmad/Muhammad in Arabic) is he that comes in the name of the Lord.” In other words, the Mosaic and Davidic covenants which the Messiah was to fulfill, would be cancelled and the covenant of Islam would be transferred to the Praised One (Ahmad/Muhammad) who came ‘in the name of’ God or Allah. Luke 13:35 confirms Matthew 21:43 in which Jesus says that the kingdom of God would be taken from the Jews and given to another nation. “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit.” So, the houses of Aaron (the priesthood) and David (kingdom of Judah) remained desolate and expelled from Jerusalem until Omar ibn Khattab restored the Christian expelled Jews to Jerusalem in 637 CE.
Not first.
Those who follow the Messenger (Mohammed), the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them (7:157 MP).
And when there cometh unto them (Jews) a Scripture (the Qur'an) from Allah, confirming that in their possession (2:89 MP).
@@matt291 and now you have to prove whether the jews of 7th century arabia have the same torah as we have today
20k views vs 600k views 😊
True fans vs grifter/ p@jeets and others
Quantity over quality. Typical for Christians.
20K intellectuals vs 600K idiots
6:29 💀
David ik u read this, fear Allah and repent to him or else ur leading urself to a painful miserable life ahead in the next world.
the accent of apus is cringeworthy
I love you Farid