Neil deGrasse Tyson explains zero
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 жов 2023
- Neil deGrasse Tyson explains zero
🔥 Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
🌌 More Explosive Science Debates
🔔 Don't miss out on gripping discussions between world-renowned scientists. SUBSCRIBE and turn on notifications.
#NeildeGrasseTyson #LawrenceKrauss #AstrophysicsDebate #ScienceShowdown #HeatedDiscussion"
Tags:
Neil deGrasse Tyson,neil,degrasse,Degrasse,deGrasse,Neil DeGrasse Tyson,Quantum Mechanics,Physics,Star Talk,Astrophysics,Astronomy,Neil degrasse Tyson interview,science fiction,Stephen Colbert,Planet X,Asteroid Apophis,Wolf moon,Dark Energy,Pluto,God Particle,Multiverse,Black Hole,Isaac Newton,Dark Matter,Bill Nye,SpaceX,elon musk,terraforming,mars exploration
why is there sigma music over neil degrasse tyseon talking 😂
😂😂the internet is a hot mess right now
sigma music is gay, so id say its being used right for once
@@bair276 yep niel degrasse tyson what a sigma
They are using it to exploit the Algorithm as it is popular on UA-cam so using the sound makes the video pop up on more people’s feed. I hope that makes sense
@@bair276 I dont think NDT is gay lol
Damn can’t believe Jesus did all that at 4 years of age
He did most of what you hear about at around 33 years of age. 4 BC is the best guess at his his approximate birth year when you put it all together; the ruler at that time, when he did the census, when it was delivered, etc..
No
It means he was born 4 years before he was supposed to be born
@@rentisme my guy it was a joke
@@jetoler7379a bad one
@@unrealpotato2230 The likes seem to disagree
Small correction, the cardinal zero has almost always existed in our culture (I have no money was probably a phrase uttered), but the concept that the cardinals and the ordinals couod be merged and treat zero like an ordinal was a brand new idea from Hindu numerals.
Never forget that what makes math great is the connection of seemingly unrelated ideas and merging them into one.
So the concept of nothing existed, but zero as a number didn't?
@@hanneswiggenhorn2023in that part of the world
cardinal and ordinal are probably not the right words here
@@hanneswiggenhorn2023just like imaginary numbers don't exist in real life but they're useful in math. Same with Zero
@@cameronlamb1869 actually imaginary numbers do exist in real life, they are useful for calculating electromagnetic stuff I think, they are practically just 2D numbers, but I get what you mean
Wouldn’t 1 AD mean “the first year of our lord?” That makes more sense to me than 0 AD
Ad means "after death" as in after the death of Christ, as Neil said, bc means before Christ as in "before his birth", it's either the first of all the years before his birth, or the first of all the years after he ascended into heaven
@@cameronmcmenomy6800no it means anno dommoni. Aka the year of our lord.
@@timdeathly thanks for the info, I did not know that, I retract my previous comment.
@@cameronmcmenomy6800Officially the most respectful youtube commenter.
@@cameronmcmenomy68001st time I've ever seen someone stand corrected in a comment section. Well done UA-cam!/srs
POV: The interviewer asked what the date was
"How many people are here, besides the 2 of us?"
"..."
The importance of aryabhatta's concept of 0 is more important than people think
True
In Japan, we just switched calendars from Haisei to Reiwa a few years back. And there was no Reiwa 0, went directly to Reiwa 1.
actually, the letter N was used to represent 0 in Roman Numerals. It wasn't widespread, yet it existed.
Here. .I wrote zero several times in roman numerals
He's too powerful to be left alive
-, _, or N would also be valid.
@@jeremiaas15 Null
Pov : Neil was asked why did he get 0 in latin
It may not be a numeral, but the concept existed. Latin had an adjective called "Nullus". So instead of a Roman saying "0 dollars" they would say "Nulla pecūnia".
Also AD doesn't mean after death, it means "Annō Dominī" which means "in the year of the Lord"
AD doesn’t mean after death, but refers to the latin phrase “Anno Domini”, the year of our lord. it is said that he died around the year 30-33AD.
don’t mansplain about something you haven’t briefly searched on google about.
He literally never said that it meant after death. Quite the opposite. He was literally saying that Jesus couldn't have been born in 1 BC or 1 AD. If he thought it meant after death, he wouldn't have said it like that. He clearly was talking about AD as coming right after BC.
It’s actually insane that people still think ad means after death
anno domini
It does
Here in Italy we use D.C. (dopo Cristo) which means after christ and A.C. (Avanti Cristo) and it's like Forward Christ, I can't explain it but it works so there's that.
@@locus2427 It means Anno Domini which translates to year of our lord.
who gives af
Pov: He asked Neil which frying pan he should use
I can't tell whats worse; That he doesn't understand the roman numerical system while talking on it, or that he just factually wrong about 0 not having been created yet by a couple thousand years.
“It’s a miracle!” 😂😂 brilliant
😂😂😂
AD 1 makes since because it means the year of our lord meaning the first year of our Lord. Of course it would make sense that they could be off a year or two though.
not because 1 is the first year and you cant have a 0th year?
"how much money you got?"
"Less than one"
AD does not even stand for after death
Annus domini
@@kermot1833*anno Domini
@@sabrinaantonioverita3061 well i studied latin but i was really bad at it, thanks for the correction!
I dont think anyone within vicinity pf education thought its After Death
Anno domini
Papa Emeritus has entered the chat
Welcome year zero!
Ahh yes, it cant be AD..
....because AD means "year of our lord"
"you cannot write 0 in Roman numerals"
I-I :
Context: "Hey, Niel, what do you want for Christmas?"
No need for a bass drop at "The concept of zero was not invented." But it was enjoyed.
That camera did Niel dirty.
I’m more impressed by the go car footage 💀
same
I love how everyone is pointing out that AD stands for anno domini but why is no one pointing out that he’s referring to the Gregorian calendar, not the Julian.
The concept of zero didn't exist in Rome, but it did in India and the Mayan civilization
The concept of nothing did in fact exist in Rome. The first recorded use of zero specifically was in Mesopotamia around 3 BC before both Indian, Mayan, and Chinese civilization. The 0 symbol was a creation of the ancient Indian civilization.
@LandoIV nothing and zero are different. The concept of nothing existed, but the symbol for zero didn't
Neil was asked what day it was
it's a matter of perspective. the calendar would either show which year is currently in progress, or how many years have been completed.
oddly, we use both perspectives.
calendars show which year/month/day is currently in progress, whereas our notation of time shows how many hours/minutes/seconds have been completed.
bringing either of them in line with the other would feel very weird; either today (1st of december 2023) would be 00/11/2022,
or midnight would have the clock reading 01:01.
It's not a matter of perspective. That year doesn't just exist for some people's cultures and then exist for others. It's not like the Persians were watching the Roman empire align a timekeeping system and were like, "nah we'll just stick to counting the moons, thanks".
Either that year existed, the year 0 AD or 0 BC or whatever, or it didn't. And pretty much all of society agrees that it goes from 1BC to 1AD. Period.
AD does not stand for after death
What does it stand for then?
@@Tlyt.anno Domini. its latin and means “in the year of the Lord”
@@sabrinaantonioverita3061 OK thank you
Yep, and BC doesn't make much sense either, which is why everyone switched to BCE (before common era). If BC means years before christ was born and AD refers to years after christ's death, then there would supposedly be a ~35 year gap between 0BC and 0AD.
This is why its better to use Before Christ (before he was born) / Before our time calculation and After Christ (after his birth) /After our time calculation, like in my language hungarian
Rome didn’t use BC and AD at first they used the founding of the city as the reference point
“The concept of zero was not yet invented.”
In Europe, maybe. The Mayans and ancient Mesopotamians had had a mathematical concept of zero for like 1500 years by the time Europe created the Gregorian calendar.
that's cool and all, but he's literally talking about a European system of counting...
The concept of 0 is actually a really good perspective of how current math differs from math in the past! Matg in the past was much more practical, like you used it to calculate land, trade and so on. The math was pretty mich done by geometry. For all of this you don't really need a zero as a number. For comparison, today we often think of math more as a graph, multidimensional even if needed
Me looking at the crazy trackmania gameplay:
The map is pretty good made, yes.
The context is that he was asked what 1 - 1 is.
What if it wasonly 5 % invented?
I like the subtitles for their laughing
Context: Neil was asked what his favourite star sign is.
DONT MAKE ME GO BACK TO 2019 I DONT WANNA GO
It’s not that the concept wasn’t invented, it’s that it’s representation in Roman numerals wasn’t a thing, zero existed
Zero cant be added or subtracted from anything or multiplied by anything, so it held no use for why the numbers were created to begin with.
Our friend Niel is wrong about this history lesson during 2007 there has been evidence that Ancient Sumarians in Mesopotamian civilizations had a reference to the idea of Zero. Sumarians came before the time Anno Domini.
Honestly the concept was there, it’s just that back then they liked to use a lot of words with the math, the equal sign is relatively newer math staple. They would just say none rather then zero
This helped me answering a question in person 5
I was like "0 are not invented, its theorized, a theory or a concept!" then the video loop back and I heard "the concept of zero is not yet invented"
so folk, before you disagree or angry with something, maybe look back and maybe its a whole misunderstanding...
I find it funny when i tell people that zero is technically more a concept than it is a number people will quarrel and argue to the end of the world. Yet i got that little piece of knowledge from listening to stuff like this, from people that got a degree in messing around with numbers. (I mean ofcourse its a number. But its also a concept of nothing just like we use pi for 3.14)
Aristotle at least is said to have said that Dividing by zero leads to no meaningful calculation so there is no point in using it as a number.
He just makes it up as he goes along
This guy moves around when he talks more than Rodney Dangerfield did
The interval of time in an instant cannot be measured
B.C and AD didnt actually mean "Before Christ" and "After Death" until the roman empire was taken over by the Christians.
They had no number zero in Roman numerals yes, but they used the Latin words nullus (none) or nihil (nothing) to signify the same thing
AD stands for Anno Domini, year of the lord. Doesnt have shit to do with "after"
Roman numerals do not have a symbol for zero. The Roman numeral system was developed in ancient Rome and primarily used for counting. It lacks a numeral to represent the concept of zero, which was a significant limitation of this system. The concept of zero as a number was later introduced in other numeral systems, such as the Arabic numeral system, which is widely used today.
Did they actually use this calendar
Not quite true, the Romans use the word "nulla" for zero, meaning 'nothing'. By 525 AD the Roman numeral 'N' was used to represent 'nulla', zero. So there is a Roman numeral zero now.
Zero in Roman numerals are just the absence of Roman numerals because zero is the absence of anything you’re counting and Roman numerals are a system for counting like any numerical system. They recognized that they simply don’t need something to represent zero because the absence can represent the absence, no deeper than that. On top of that they also don’t write their numbers as numbers like we do, their numbers are represented by letters so if you’re trying to write 1,000 in Roman numerals you wouldn’t need a 1 or zero anywhere, you just need an M. We however write our numbers as numbers so to write literally any number in the 10s value you need something to represent 0 because if we didn’t have a 0 to write then we wouldn’t be able to write numbers over 10
How they calculate 0.X numbers ?
This isn't true. Zero was represented as nothing there.
0 wasn’t a thing
@@light_skityes it was, zero in the modern language may not have been a thing. But zero is just the idea of nothing or counting nothing. The idea most definitely existed before that. People understood what nothing was 2000 years ago. Zero was just called somthing else
@@dadiabetic1174nope, no such thing 👎
@@oceanman2641 you…you read my comment right
Me: uses logic to explain why zero is a concept and there existed despite not having a name
You: Nuh Uh
@@dadiabetic1174clearly people are talking about Zero in Math, not Logic
Rome hadn't heard of India where they HAD invented zero.
The concept of zero (as a placeholder and null value) was found in Babylon LONG before the Roman’s
How tf did they write down "Yeah we dont got any, none, Nada"
Just leave that part of the parchment blank?
It was just a placeholder before it became a number so invention of concept of zero is attributed to Aryabhatta. He started using zero in mathematical operations instead of just using it to say 52 is different from 520
World hunger didnt exist back then because nobody could comprehend when they didnt have any food
Thats completely incorrect. The romans did not use the BC AD system until hundreds of years after jesus’s death. They used how many years since rome’s creation. The US does a similar thing on official documents.
The wheel is the first form of zero. lol
the fuck..?
This was mainstream knowledge decades ago.
Year 0 don't really excit well it can be start of time (Big Bang)
No, americans get this wrong because they try to rationalize AD as english, it's actually Anno Domini, year of our lord, in latin, not "after death", now, BC is english, other languages use other stuff
Whats the game at the bottom
so basically Officer she was over 18
No it is because it is the first year. The first day is the first and the first month of the year is 1. Sunday is the first day of the week. Also if you are thinking of payments for insurance renting etc this system makes more sense. Payment due at the beginning of each month for coverage that month. This system focuses on the present rather than completed.
It just got mixed up because everyone just wanted to be right lol
The Julian calendar did not use BC/AD. It was invented decades before the dawn of Christianity. If the Julian calendar needed to number the years, it would be in years after the mythical founding date of Rome. But most of the time, years were denoted by who was elected consul that year.
Why would there be a year 0? Its the 1st year, not the 0th year.
How much money you got?
"Atleast 1 i guess"
Young Sheldon grew up
It confuses me that some people can't comprehend that we're in the 21st century. If 2000 - 2100 was the 20th century, what would 1 - 100 be? The 0th century?
This i feel needs to be fact checked
He meant Justinian not Julian
The concept of 0 was invented by both the Mayans and Indus civilizations by that point. The Romans just hadnt invented it or heard about it by then.
wait til' ppl figure out minus zero
POV: You asked Neil DeGrasse Tyson what 2-2 was
AD has nothing to do with “after,” Neil.
The “A” stands for “anno” which means “year.” The whole thing means “in the year of our Lord.”
And these miraculous "years of our Lord" happened AFTER which event again?
AFTER the birth of Jesus? Riiiiiight.
yes it does..? AD is AFTER year 0. besides, you think Neil doesn't know the definition of AD? seriously? he's not talking about the definition of "AD", he's talking about passing of time - and AD comes AFTER year 0.
I think they start saying A.D. like in 380 A.D., so up until then they count from the birth of Rome in 753 A.D.
This reminded me of the banger Jack Black comedy "Year One".
You bless me with your wisdom once again Neil 🙏 🙌 😌
The year 0 doesn't exist because zero itself doesn't exist. It is literally a placeholder for nothing.
The 12 months before year 1 does though 😢
There's about a seven year spread when the official birth might be. It's based on a a few periods that are also a tiny bit iffy in relation to the current date.
So it’s actually 2019??? right??? RIGHT?????
No
I don't understand why you would put this music over this, there's nothing even remotely epic going on
Does that mean it's technically 2022?
Meanwhile the Mesopotamians understood the concept of 0 as early as 400 B.C
What is that game
IIIIIV is 0 in roman numerals. 5-5.
Game?
you understand AD means year of the Lord? It’s abbreviated like that however, because it was Latin originally
I'm thinking that AD 1 means like, the path to 1 year at the time, like how we say we live in the 21st century
the concept of zero is nothing, so it makes sense it took time to discover the existence of the non existent zero
how to write 0 with roman numerals:
Wait til they find out that AD and BC didn't exist until much later 💀
Literally everyone already knows that