Canon EF 70 200 f/2.8 IS II - Is it worth buying 14 years after relase?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • I have been using the Canon EF 70 200 f/2.8 IS II since it was released 14 years ago. Check out my opinion on how it still kicking butt 14 years later with an adapter on my EOS R5, R6 and makes me question if I even need the canon RF 70-200

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @vladimirorodrigues
    @vladimirorodrigues 7 місяців тому +4

    Dreaming with one... It's on my bucket list for one day

  • @carnal032
    @carnal032 7 днів тому +1

    I love your blog men since day 1 thank you for sharing more tips and knowledge about camera and lenses , you are my inspiration about photography , and it's amazing, I'm Canon user too I wish I could have like canon zoom lens, 70-200mm watching from Philippines

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  10 годин тому

      I love it 💪. Keep up the hard work and practice to save up the 💰 and I'm sure you'll be able to have it one day too! Thanks for the support!

  • @denniscornelisse341
    @denniscornelisse341 7 місяців тому +2

    For years now I use the non-IS version of this lens. It's really great and gives so good images!

  • @kitsilanobob
    @kitsilanobob 4 місяці тому +2

    Thanks for making this - I am looking at getting this lens used for my R8 for indoor sports photography. I can't bring myself to buy the RF version for 3x the cost!

  • @derek.productions.photos
    @derek.productions.photos 2 дні тому +1

    I’m looking at getting this lens for my Canon 90 D and I’m also picking up the 100 to 400 USM Mark two (had one but broke it) I’m going to be pairing that all with the canon C100 Mark two. Aishu weddings to make money and Wildlife documentaries for fun.

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  2 дні тому

      Awesome. You're gonna love it. It's a great lens.

  •  7 місяців тому +1

    Bought mine in around 2011, when it came out. Used it on many sport occasions with 60D, it was always awesome and pleasure to use. I will never sell it.

  • @spirg
    @spirg 6 місяців тому +2

    picked up 1 yesterday ... Fabulous lens

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  6 місяців тому

      You're going to love it.

  • @BrucePhung
    @BrucePhung 7 місяців тому +1

    I got this lens for $1999 back then. It was $2499 lens. I love the internal zoom. I still got this lens and no plan to get rid of it. I don't mind the weight and size at all.

  • @3p1cr1d3r
    @3p1cr1d3r 5 місяців тому +1

    I’ve own that lens for about 6 years now and I’m about to upgrade from an 80D to an R10 and wanted to hear some opinions about this combo (Ef to RF mirrorless) Thank you for your review!!

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  4 місяці тому

      You'll love it. I think it gets even better on the mirrorless bodies.

  • @coach_yo
    @coach_yo 6 місяців тому +1

    Love my mkii it’s a beast!!! Using it for soccer and it will take a lot….of money…….😅 to get me to switch to RF version of the 70-200

  • @leevihalme4615
    @leevihalme4615 2 місяці тому +1

    Thanks, I'm debating between getting this one or RF one, and I feel like this will be the way to go. Extending lens like the RF version is a bit problematic for the type of shooting I do (it could work for wildlife which I also do, but snowy dog sled races and sandy tracks of greyhound races would probably bust that quite quickly)

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  2 місяці тому

      If price is a factor at all, I would defiantly go with this lens. There are rumors of a new RF 70-200 on the horizon that does not extend. Some are saying it could be later this year but it could also be next year.

  • @Uknowjustin
    @Uknowjustin 7 місяців тому +1

    This lens is GOAT'd

  • @djeff31
    @djeff31 Місяць тому +1

    Also considering on my Canon R8!

    • @djeff31
      @djeff31 Місяць тому

      Aaannnddd I just bought it!! :)

  • @N_v_G
    @N_v_G Місяць тому +1

    Watching and considering.

    • @N_v_G
      @N_v_G 28 днів тому

      Bought it!

    • @BruceLeroyUK
      @BruceLeroyUK 21 день тому

      ​@@N_v_G thoughts?

  • @thewessexwanderer
    @thewessexwanderer 7 місяців тому +1

    I was just looking at getting this second hand!

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  7 місяців тому

      Hope this helped!

  • @scofield117
    @scofield117 Місяць тому +1

    It’s a good thing you didn’t spend the money to upgrade from the IS ii to the IS iii, because the only difference is that Canon changed the shade of white they paint the lens. Optically the ii and the iii are identical.

    • @BruceLeroyUK
      @BruceLeroyUK 21 день тому +1

      I'm 10,000% certain Canon would disagree with that statement 😂😂💵💵💵

  • @abuk0028
    @abuk0028 6 місяців тому +1

    I'm still using 70-200 f/4 IS from 2006 and it's still great, but sometimes autofocus is a bit slow. I'm thinking about buying f/2.8 IS III unfortunately it's too expensive for me atm.

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  5 місяців тому

      What camera body are you using with it?

    • @BruceLeroyUK
      @BruceLeroyUK 21 день тому

      Have you checked out the used market?

  • @ryanflorey-qs3mf
    @ryanflorey-qs3mf 7 місяців тому

    Bought one yesterday!

  • @drewhollings
    @drewhollings 7 місяців тому +1

    I have this lens and find it handy, however I'm not super impressed with the IQ of my copy. Generally, I'll use a prime, particularly for action shots 📸

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  7 місяців тому +1

      I have heard there are some bad copies of it. You could always send it to canon to have it calibrated.

  • @Kae648
    @Kae648 7 місяців тому +1

    I have this and it’s so heavy!! I use it with my dslr & I even bought it new so I wish I used it more😭

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  7 місяців тому

      It's great glass. And be happy to know if you switch to mirrorless, it will work even better

  • @baecloudy3436
    @baecloudy3436 7 місяців тому +1

    I bought this lens trying to get into sports photography, I have my first game next week. I have it attached to the canon m50 mII, you think thats good enough? was planning to save up and get a 1dx but the first one, i can get that around like 700, but I dont know where I should go with it, because I think I def need a DSLR attached with this lens because sports photography is what I want to focus on. Also good video, gotta new sub, never know when I would need to shoot a wedding day haha!

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  7 місяців тому

      The m50 is a decent camera. But for most sports id personally want something a little more robust. What sports are you planning to shoot and how far from the action will you be?

    • @baecloudy3436
      @baecloudy3436 7 місяців тому

      @@jaylphoto Pretty much any game I can get my hands on, focusing on basketball, volleyball, and baseball at the moment, but eventually/hopefully football in future

  • @acedia4453
    @acedia4453 7 місяців тому

    Its an absolute must! AFTER you have your prime set in place. All zoom lenses are soft at every focal length including the new RF version. This is a great sports photography lens but not ideal for portrait work.

  • @igorpelin6049
    @igorpelin6049 2 місяці тому

    Nice lens I’m sure

  • @paigeofstylez
    @paigeofstylez 12 днів тому

    You didnt make this video for no reason but nobody carries the mark ii version. So im considering a tamron g2 version

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  10 годин тому

      You might be able to find it second hand on the used market but most people I know with it aren't giving it up because they like it so much.

  • @condadodealhamahomes
    @condadodealhamahomes 7 місяців тому +1

    The 70 200 f2.8 i is even shaper than the human eye. I made super sharp fotos with even a 8mp camera and this lens.

    • @jaylphoto
      @jaylphoto  7 місяців тому

      👀 gotta love some L glass