Atul Subhash | SC lawyer explains misuse of harassment laws in divorce cases | SC Alimony guideline

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • #atulsubhash #section498a #supremecourt
    Everyone was devastated by the news of the suicide of Bangalore Techie, Atul Subhash. He made a video before his death where he explained that he was under immense pressure from multiple harassment cases filed by his wife against him. In this video, we talk to Supreme Court lawyer Nipun Saxena who explains the misuse of such laws and clears up various misinformation about such laws.
    Video Producer: Alan John
    Video Editor: Immaya
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    We are active on social media! Follow us:
    Facebook: / thenewindianxpress
    Twitter: / newindianxpress
    APP: play.google.co...
    Stay updated with our Apps:
    For Android users: bit.ly/2EdIaWW
    iOS users: apple.co/2SrVdHf
    For more videos: www.newindianex...
    For all the important news: www.newindianex...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @SanjayKumarLenka-v1m
    @SanjayKumarLenka-v1m Місяць тому +16

    Justice for Atul

    • @shaktimaan1064
      @shaktimaan1064 Місяць тому

      Our judiciary is confused between feminism and patriarchy. On one side, it is extremely feminist and on other side, they are using patriarchal idea of women being responsibility of men when there is question of financial maintenance. But they completely ignore the fact that if maintenance is right of women, then 1st to protect mentally and morally husband and his family is the primary responsibility of wife. If she is not performing that responsibility, hurting husband and his family, then she automatically loses the right of financial maintenance.
      Courts are not extortion fraud approving centres in the name of maintenance and alimony. The litigants and also the judges themselves should keep this thing in their minds while dealing in matrimonial cases. Courts are there for justice and not to give maintenance to all litigants in General. Courts must not promote narcissistic tendencies and paracytic attitude of women in that way. Today’s society is different from earlier times. Today there are more employment opportunities for women than men, and men Women are considered equal. So Courts must change their habit of giving maintenance in general to women just because they are women. Neither the language nor the spirit of the law says that maintenance should be based on the lifestyle of the spouse. But it has been made so by the pseudo-feminists so-called legal experts crept in the law ministry and Courts. Because if lifestyle is made base of maintenance, then the marriage institution will be started to be seen as source of wealth mine only by the greedy people. How can the legal system of a benevolent enlightened democracy can promote the fraudulent tendency of the greedy people? So only and only the reasonable basic need should be granted to the spouse for maintenance of life or leave the relation with adjustment or start earning on her own. Equal status… equal status… equal status… is nothing but illegitimate fraudulent greed of the greedy people. In today’s society, the self centricity or narcissistic tendency or love to live independently in full comfort zone has increased enormously. In this backdrop, female tendency to leave the partner and live independently in her own comfort zone without any adjustment upon exploited income from husband is also increasing. Courts and lawmakers/legal system and women commission must not promote these tendencies among women. Courts must get rid of the jurisprudence Which says wife is the responsibility of husband. For young ladies, there is no dearth of job in modern time. If at all any maintenance is to be given to unemployed spouse, it should be based on the primary reasonable need of the spouse and not greed of the spouse. Long story cut. Lopsided law or lopsided approach of legal system kills the justice and environment of trust in the society. This has to be understood and stopped by Courts and lawmakers.
      Bahot ho gaya ek tarfa kanun. Bahot ho gaya. Enough is enough now we want justice for men.. Women, please stop missuse of law, courts, please stop cruelty by adopting one sided false jurisprudence

  • @cicerof
    @cicerof Місяць тому +10

    Justice for men who have already suffered heinous crime by women with vendetta

  • @mohithviswanathan5132
    @mohithviswanathan5132 Місяць тому +19

    There should be video recording of every family court proceeding and suo motu case on the women and their lawyers if the charges are fake or if they try to take back their case...

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      So if a case is not proven right, the person filing case should be charged, interesting…
      Then if a girl files a rape case & due to improper investigation or compromised the eye witnesses, then the girl only will go in the jail?
      Nice justice ha…….
      Next time your child will be molested, you will fear to even file a compliant… great.

  • @gamerrapter
    @gamerrapter Місяць тому +14

    Every Law will change when men start taking the law into their own hands
    I don't see an alternative

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому +1

      Mard ek gunda hota hai……

    • @gamerrapter
      @gamerrapter Місяць тому

      @@Kathakathan11 what do you mean?

    • @buck8266
      @buck8266 Місяць тому

      True, they should just unalive their inlaws in such cases.

    • @vagitaro_sama
      @vagitaro_sama Місяць тому

      ​@@gamerrapterignore him just 15 16 sal ke bache .

  • @thecontrarycontrarian4230
    @thecontrarycontrarian4230 Місяць тому

    Men's commissions and ministries are needed very badly to protect men in this feminist society

  • @iti791
    @iti791 Місяць тому +5

    Protect Innocent husbands from false cases by wives

    • @dranandphd
      @dranandphd Місяць тому

      Yes Sir, all these characters should be punished, they should have a reverse law to punish both ( both wife and her family members ) under the same law 498a act . Why always men become victim. My humble request to all judiciary system to avoid alimony, if they are greedy to to swindle husband money. Thanks 🙏🙏🙏 Sir 🙏 our policy should be " no dowry no no alimony" 😊😊😊

  • @surindersingh-pn6dw
    @surindersingh-pn6dw Місяць тому +6

    To get rid of archaic matrimonial dispute laws, corrupt family courts, parasite lawyers and Court staff, leech police, make Prenup agreement mandatory. Extent of rights and liabilities is determined before marriage leaving very meagre leeway for both husband and wife. It will also bring down divorce rate, litigation.

    • @RawEcstacy
      @RawEcstacy Місяць тому

      In India, with the way the contract laws have been framed, a prenup is in direct violation of the contract act and therefore it is not enforceable.

  • @harish_truthful
    @harish_truthful Місяць тому

    Explained very well. Thank you for awareness

  • @pokerboy72
    @pokerboy72 Місяць тому +4

    Citizens don't misuse laws.. lawyers do

    • @goodnature13g19
      @goodnature13g19 Місяць тому +1

      100% agreed. we have so many liar lawyers and they do all these nonsenses for money.

    • @pokerboy72
      @pokerboy72 Місяць тому +1

      @goodnature13g19 and where do nml people know shortcuts and way around laws.. it's all lawyers

    • @anthonycosta128
      @anthonycosta128 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@pokerboy72It is both stop defending criminals who play with the loopholes of laws they are equally evil

  • @maureensamson4863
    @maureensamson4863 Місяць тому +4

    Laws are misused and the judiciary isn't concerned ? They're the people hearing the Cases ... if I may add , at snail pace !😢😢

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      All laws are misused, I hope we have police and judicial reforms. We should have pre nup system, good for women honestly….and men will not have to worry too.

  • @goodnature13g19
    @goodnature13g19 Місяць тому +1

    It is done and well misguided by few cheating and money minded advocates. They damaged many father's life and not allowed them to meet their own children. Karma should punish them.

  • @VishnuAnilkumar1
    @VishnuAnilkumar1 Місяць тому +2

    He forgets to mention the cases where there is ample evidence that he is innocent, but since woman's testimony is used as evidence, they were marked as acquittal because her words are equal to proof.
    I got angry and stopped watching in middle. He is trying to downplay the issue.

  • @kashyaptandel4678
    @kashyaptandel4678 Місяць тому +1

    Giving punishments won’t give him “justice” the real justice he wants is improving the laws, so noone else suffers what he has…
    Making gender neutral laws and giving punishments for false cases

  • @gtalawar
    @gtalawar Місяць тому

    justice is awaited

  • @shankarrajan7386
    @shankarrajan7386 Місяць тому

    Frankly speaking, we common public are interested in results and ensure justice to wronged person.

  • @zroth3734
    @zroth3734 Місяць тому +3

    Words like accuse, alleged are being used here... Had it been a woman, said, confirmed would have been used here

  • @Trend369
    @Trend369 Місяць тому +10

    Government is sleeping
    After this i am happy to say that i am single and i will die single
    Jai Hanuman 🚩

    • @dhruv6019
      @dhruv6019 Місяць тому

      Government is NOT sleeping but making laws more stringent.. SC had diluted marriage laws and SC/ST act but Maulana Modi made them more stringent

    • @buck8266
      @buck8266 Місяць тому

      Not even singles are safe, one false rape or sexual harrasment case is enough to case you lot of trouble

  • @noelcarvalho559
    @noelcarvalho559 Місяць тому

    Justice for 498 against Men. J4ATUL J4Men.

  • @vagitaro_sama
    @vagitaro_sama Місяць тому

    That women , that women should be kept in isolated jail for lifetime.

  • @shashisubramaniam3630
    @shashisubramaniam3630 Місяць тому +2

    Everyone is blaming the women, but the root cause is police who are responsible, make enormous money and don't take action on someone filing false cases, they instead act on false cases with lighting speed!

    • @apontutul
      @apontutul Місяць тому +3

      There's no law for punishment for false case

    • @shashisubramaniam3630
      @shashisubramaniam3630 Місяць тому +1

      @apontutul there is law, former section 211 of IPC, but there is no implementation. Same is with Perjury (fase affidavit in court) but still parliament will be busy with Soros and Adani issue

  • @goodnature13g19
    @goodnature13g19 Місяць тому

    No law or guidance to punish or penalize the fake or false cases filed by the people. Due to absence of this, they continue to file it. High time to change it now.

    • @rameshk1762
      @rameshk1762 Місяць тому

      because after knowing court procedures, corrupt practices no person is ready to drag in to another round of litigation, Invariably all the advocates guiding such crooked ladies to mint money, If the lady is from poor starta of society they never entertain brief , I am also dealing one case here with four civil cases and two criminal cases

  • @mrrajsen
    @mrrajsen Місяць тому +2

    What if the investigating officer is corrupt?

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      They are. In all the cases. Not just these divorce cases, but even in murder, kidnapping and other cases, then there are honest ones too, it’s your luck here,….

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      Woh shastra mein kya kehte the, prarabhdha hai…

  • @lroopeashlekallapudi6554
    @lroopeashlekallapudi6554 Місяць тому

    Sec 211 also to be applied against false cases even if the victim dont ask for it.

  • @varshasindhu5672
    @varshasindhu5672 Місяць тому +1

    how is conviction rate 0.09%? didn't understand the calculation.

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      Evidence can be tampered with. Eye witnesses are bought. Mostly cases it’s the evidence that is not admissible. Just because someone is not convicted doesn’t mean he is not the criminal. But then again, till this news will settle down men will not think rationally……

  • @ccd-cleancodedev2099
    @ccd-cleancodedev2099 Місяць тому

    Why wasn;t he asked about Judge corruption ??

  • @sureshr2707
    @sureshr2707 Місяць тому

    Bangalore men having face same case. Is law help or media will help. Only trp

  • @ksomasekharababu2093
    @ksomasekharababu2093 Місяць тому

    Why not gender neutral laws shall be the NORM.
    Especially when male and female are equal, as per the Constitution of India.
    How can these laws differentiate and pit against wife and husband???? Such a nonsense.

  • @p.r.s.narayana2639
    @p.r.s.narayana2639 Місяць тому

    How many cases of such were there before enactment of this section sir and what was the married person's population and the total population of india then. In India the acts made for very few cases of such are making the families to face problems in family and also in society through police at the threshold and other fourth estate persons. Very sad state for peaceful living of couple in four rooms having some ruptures. Counseling is good exercise by family courts councessors from advocates and socially vvips in this field mainly from suffered families.

  • @chandanarajesha7692
    @chandanarajesha7692 Місяць тому

    Men or not atm cards men also having emotional bond with kids why we have to pay money when wifes are not allowing meet kids

  • @brenzikmohaa
    @brenzikmohaa Місяць тому

    badlaav kijie judge sahaab.

  • @anshuldwivedi1919
    @anshuldwivedi1919 Місяць тому

    IO ko paisa khane ka mauka de diya SC ne CRPC Section 41 me

  • @Ayonokojikiyotoka
    @Ayonokojikiyotoka Місяць тому

    Boycott BNS85

  • @sammynochains3455
    @sammynochains3455 Місяць тому +1

    Justice is due

  • @mjayaselan6587
    @mjayaselan6587 Місяць тому

    S

  • @SanjayKumarLenka-v1m
    @SanjayKumarLenka-v1m Місяць тому +6

    Justice for Atul

    • @rayrwyr
      @rayrwyr Місяць тому

      Do protest march in the street with others.

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 Місяць тому

      @@rayrwyrno protest in my locality. Searching for new places….