I would like to meet Professor Lennox, he has the most genuine comprehensive commentary regarding the discovery of the laws of nature, and sceince describes the result of God's created world. The opinions of the average scientist only confirms what God told those who he appointed to write the Bible. He created it, but God felt no need to go into detail the processes in which he used to achieve matter and energy which is our known reality, life, maybe God left it to those who practice science as a path leading to him... People like Krause acts like the path leads to himself, deep down he knows he can not take credit... He should humble himself and give credit where credit is due...
Correction: a math professor who takes the writers of as Bible as revealing much truth, some in a literal context and others in a spiritual/metaphorical context. There is no reason to assume his math is mistaken because he takes the Bible seriously in its proper context.
He also has millions of years and a progressive creationism position. Seems to buy a certain degree of evolutionism. Here he gives an interesting talk on what he believes. vimeo.com/60014422
Is God a delusion? What a question! What else could it be? No religo-babble from the likes of John Lennox has ever provided empirical evidence of the contrary. Blah, blah, blah and so on ad nauseam!
GeoCoppens welcome to another John Lennox video in which you demand empirical evidence for the existence of God as if God is a math equation that can be “proved.” There are different types of evidence required to explain the existence of God, such as experiential and historical.
Fantastically clear explanations, what a brilliant Q&A this is.
I would like to meet Professor Lennox, he has the most genuine comprehensive commentary regarding the discovery of the laws of nature, and sceince describes the result of God's created world. The opinions of the average scientist only confirms what God told those who he appointed to write the Bible. He created it, but God felt no need to go into detail the processes in which he used to achieve matter and energy which is our known reality, life, maybe God left it to those who practice science as a path leading to him... People like Krause acts like the path leads to himself, deep down he knows he can not take credit... He should humble himself and give credit where credit is due...
A math professor who takes the bible as literal truth? I'm just glad he's not my children's professor.
Correction: a math professor who takes the writers of as Bible as revealing much truth, some in a literal context and others in a spiritual/metaphorical context. There is no reason to assume his math is mistaken because he takes the Bible seriously in its proper context.
It' a pity that you and your children do not deserve Dr Lennox as your Professor.
He's pretty good at dismissing misconceptions of Biblical text.
Nice speech.
I question enclosed. Could not have rain if the earth was not enclosed.
A lot of scientists are so arrogant and condescending. Lennox has the brains, but he doesn't have the 'tude!
He also has millions of years and a progressive creationism position. Seems to buy a certain degree of evolutionism. Here he gives an interesting talk on what he believes. vimeo.com/60014422
Except it is contrary to genesis account. That’s why they claim atheism and IS an argument. Nice try
Is God a delusion? What a question! What else could it be? No religo-babble from the likes of John Lennox has ever provided empirical evidence of the contrary. Blah, blah, blah and so on ad nauseam!
GeoCoppens welcome to another John Lennox video in which you demand empirical evidence for the existence of God as if God is a math equation that can be “proved.” There are different types of evidence required to explain the existence of God, such as experiential and historical.
@@Myeeers What the fuck is "experiential" evidence for "God"?. What is "historical" evidence for "God"? Name it! Otherwise it's vacuous babble!