When it come to Christology, I think it's safer to stay in line with what the Church Fathers taught regarding Christology. The Reformed tends to deviate away from the boundaries that the Church Fathers have put and go into Theological Speculation, whereas the Lutherans are more Patristic with our Theology.
I generally find Lutheran to be not only more intuitive in terms of Scriptural interpretations, but I definitely believe it's also much more in line with patristic doctrines as well. Not to say that Reformed isn't. I just think a lot of Lutherans can relate to reading Lutheran argumentation and reading endless, heaps upon heaps of Sciptural and Patristic texts, while I find that Reformed use citations to establish that a doctrine isn't novel and the rest of the argument is typically based from reasoning. Not that I think there's anything wrong with that, but just two different approaches.
At 1:23:39 Wow, I didn't know that the Reformed are accussing Lutherans of heresy. It's actually laughable 😂 Reason for me leaving the Reformed tradition is because I saw the prevalency of Christological Nestorianism in it.
Where were you seeing nestorianism just out of curiosity? Was it in the confessions or did people just tend to say things that sounded Nestorian when you talked with them?
@@kolab5620 actually, Luther accused Calvin as nestorian and Calvin in his Institutes does the same against Luther. But, beyond these quarrels, the lutheran theology is absolutely perfect compared with the calvinian one.
@@kolab5620 If you want to know the major differences betweem Lutheranism and Calvinism, go read the Saxon Visitation Articles of 1592, put forth by the Lutherans against Calvinist teachings.
Excellent presentation.
Yes yes yes yes yes yes
Thanks for this. It was great!
When it come to Christology, I think it's safer to stay in line with what the Church Fathers taught regarding Christology.
The Reformed tends to deviate away from the boundaries that the Church Fathers have put and go into Theological Speculation, whereas the Lutherans are more Patristic with our Theology.
I generally find Lutheran to be not only more intuitive in terms of Scriptural interpretations, but I definitely believe it's also much more in line with patristic doctrines as well. Not to say that Reformed isn't. I just think a lot of Lutherans can relate to reading Lutheran argumentation and reading endless, heaps upon heaps of Sciptural and Patristic texts, while I find that Reformed use citations to establish that a doctrine isn't novel and the rest of the argument is typically based from reasoning.
Not that I think there's anything wrong with that, but just two different approaches.
I actually think it’s the exact opposite (I am Old Catholic)
I Love this!
Btw is Javier Lutheran?
No. Baptist pastor.
He is now! 🎉
At 1:23:39
Wow, I didn't know that the Reformed are accussing Lutherans of heresy. It's actually laughable 😂
Reason for me leaving the Reformed tradition is because I saw the prevalency of Christological Nestorianism in it.
Where were you seeing nestorianism just out of curiosity? Was it in the confessions or did people just tend to say things that sounded Nestorian when you talked with them?
@@kolab5620 actually, Luther accused Calvin as nestorian and Calvin in his Institutes does the same against Luther. But, beyond these quarrels, the lutheran theology is absolutely perfect compared with the calvinian one.
@@kolab5620 If you want to know the major differences betweem Lutheranism and Calvinism, go read the Saxon Visitation Articles of 1592, put forth by the Lutherans against Calvinist teachings.
Disco Elysium looking font.