Nugget's news I was thinking the same thing. One wonders why plate tectonics have yet to push a continent over the edge. I guess angles are on guard to keep that from happening. Wrestling angels cause earth quakes. 🤼♂️
Yet it's true, and you know it. He's shown scientifically how sea levels can rise with or without humans. Don't let your bias cloud which scientific facts you decide to accept or reject.
Even if the Earth was heating naturally (which it is), and humans had nothing to do with it (we are certainly accelerating it), what are we supposed to do about it? I agree that we should do whatever we can to reduce our impact on the environment, but I wonder if humans should go a step further and attempt to resist climate change entirely? Is it even possible?
@@fencingvhgusbd If you concentrate a large amount of mass on a smaller spot, you will sink. The constant movement of the water table and effects of rain make the buildings on the land sink. Just like standing on mud. You could take erosion into account, just like standing in the wet sand at the beach.
Sea level is lowering in Sweden, maybe land rising. If it gets warmer 1/2 of the people in the north won't go south every winter. They will use less CO2, which will make it colder, and then they will go south again. If we pay a carbon tax to stop the carbon cycle maybe this cycle will stop. Something like that.
I'm not going to lie, this video told me a lot of things I didn't know about rising sea level! This was very informative, unlike some videos that reuse common knowledge. Keep up the good work!
Well, to be fair, it IS all common knowledge, only not many people understand the connections. And others simply don't want to, because it would destroy their illusions. I expect to see more of these, as long as science remains non-heretical.
True, but these are more temporary (hours/days/weeks) than what was discussed in this video, which explais sea level rise in the long-term (decades to centuries).
hankeybillfred ... yes a system based on 10s where you only have to shift a decimal when changing units. The only thing inferior is your thought process.
Definitely! This was fascinating to learn about - geological time scales (like with the New York part of the video) are always just pretty mind blowing to think about too! What's your favourite type of science?
Erika Erikson death is also normal yet humans still use medicine to live longer. In the case of climate change, humans are accelerating the process and we can slow it down if we really try using technology
Well it kind of is. Climate change is obviously real. I mean we live on islands floating on an asymmetrical condensed ball of lava flying around a way bigger ball of plasma having a constant chain reaction creating absurd amounts of heat and light in an elliptical orbit. Yes there is very obviously going to be common and drastic changes to climate in the large scale of things. However, what is partisan about it is who or what's fault current changes are and what we should do about it.
No, not according to the science that's done on it. Maybe you should read actual scientific works and not what tabloids wrote 30 years ago. And no, Al Gore - whether he actually said it or not - is also not a scientific source of information and yes, politicians and activists - and even experts - can say wrong things because they're human and can get things confused. Scientific papers count, nothing else, not the word of policians, scientistis ect. , only the actual research and peer-reviewed meta studies.
More interesting to me is that we have to keep rediscovering everything about every thirty years or so, even though we have books stretching back millennia. One of those books said it would all get hot & muggy, and the oceans would rise, and the winds would blow, and the earth would shake, then it would all end in a lake of fire. Most fascinating is that now that it's actually happening, we believe it less than ever. I can only ASSUME that's because we don't want to accept the blame.
I like it when he says and highlights "Humans didn't cause this" and she ends it with "It's not static, it is dynamic (the Earth). Maybe the same thing can be said about climate change! Wow, what a revelation! What a shocker! The Earth actually changes on its own!
yes, how about that. My question is: The Obama's came to the White House with less that 1 million in the bank. Now he's buying a 14 Million $$ mansion beachfront property--WOW-- Where did he get the money? Oh they say "book deal" WRONG. Politicians, they just keep on stealing and lying all the way to the bank.
I'm confused, what does Al Gore have to do with climate change? Al Gore is neither a climate scientist, nor does his preferences in property purchases have anything to do with climate change. Al Gore will be dead before rising sea level has much effect on his coastal property, in the meantime he likely wants to spend his final years sitting on the beach.
Show me any sea level chart that has any rate change over the long term. They said it in the video. All stations are moving with tectonic action over long term not warming. If co2 was warming up planet and ocean it would rate change. They are not if you look at individual stations.
@@phugwad Al Gore was the man who pushed for global warming, making statements like no more ice sheets before 2010 and that your children will not know what snow is, because it will be so warm.
Des Kavanagh actually the earth has a self filtering system that involves mountains and elevation and even the axis itself and the shift of the tilt in our axis making the effect we see involving the water levels rising and falling... we get fresh water again from these rise and falls as well as every other factor I just mentioned.
Mr PumperKnuckles I live in San Francisco, and we haven’t seen one iota of sea level rise in the 50+ years that I have been here in the Bay Area. So it’s all bologna! Proof that the sea should rise the same everywhere, is that when a tsunami hits, the level of water out in the ocean is the same. The only way it changes in height, is by the amount of water being funneled into a bay or cove is of such a massive amount with a lot of power behind it to push it up the walls of a cove. But when there is no massive amount of water, with no power behind it, and only a minimal amount, then the rise of the sea level will not affect coasts much. Dare I say, imperceptibly. Think about trying to measure something that has so many variables to it like the oceans. It’s impossible to say, that they can measure a millimeter of sea level change and attribute it to manmade climate change. So just look with common sense and it’s easy to see that this is a more nefarious plot to force socialism on the free world. Proof: look at Greta, et al. Do they ever condemn China or India? Is she going there? Nope! Does she even condemn them from afar? Nope! You gotta ask yourself: Why is that? The answer is obvious.
As a geography major and climatology minor in my 3rd year at university I was thoroughly impressed with this video. You did a great job explaining the different components of sea level rise. Of course it had to be simplified for this video, but the comparisons and explanations you provided definitely conveyed the right ideas
'Humans didnt cause this' should have been more specific to the land sinking, some people will go and regurgitate to others humans didnt cause this, when speaking about global warming and maybe come up with their own conclusio. and since your video is well reasearched it will just reasseart their ignorance about global warming, then the lie will become the truth. Nice video.😉
Didn't you hear, scientists are now saying humans didn't cause global warming. It's a naturally occurring event, the earth warms and cools naturally. The story now is humans are speeding up the warming process. Stop living in the past and catch up already.
He's giving facts. he's not supporting either political belief. Brilliant scientists are on both sides of the debate, and there is un-conclusive data supporting both beliefs. Fact is, we just don't know. Anyone who tells you otherwise based on data from 2018 is not a scientist- they're a politician.
@@Ranstone That so highly incorrect, we know pretty much the mechanics that go into our climate and drivers of past climate events. We know for a fact the current driver is being accelerate dramatically by us. There are over 12k journals and that explain this topic. There isnt really a debate on rather it is occurring, there is also not a debate on the effects we will feel. The only debate is the severity and how soon, and they are even in agreement it will be bad. Potholer54 is a great communicator himself. Goes over the information.
@@Ranstone The data isn't inconclusive at all. The vast majority of scientists agree that the climate changes we are facing right now are man-made and will have severe consequences. Those with money invested in fossil fuels will probably want to tell you the opposite.
There are some locations along the coast of Alaska that have seen a 3 foot drop in average sea level. Yup, the land is rising. The earth is a living planet where things naturally change.
It might help to think about how the mass of the moon affects the oceans in the form of tides. You can actually see the water pulling away and coming back on shore by the force of gravity. The moon's surface area is about 14.6 million square miles, which is less than the total surface area of the continent of Asia (17.2 million square miles). The Earth weighs 81 times more than the moon and the moon's gravitational force is only about 16.6 percent of Earth's gravity.
Have you factored in subsidence? The New Jersey shore right through Long Island has been sinking for years, accounting for about 1/3 of the apparent "rise" of the ocean.
Because most of the beaches in NJ should never have been where they are in the first place. In the 90's they spent YEARS dredging up the sand and expanding the beaches. If those beaches get pulled back into the sea don't give me any rising sea level BS as an excuse. Sandy Hook at one point in the 70's was about to be an Island but they really built up the sand between parking lot B and C, that strip of land was rapidly declining until they expanded it. If it returns to how it naturally was you can't blame global warming/sea levels for it.
Satellite images of the world's mudflats show they are disappearing along with the creatures adapted to the mudflats. If you read historical accounts about oysters, clams, and crabs they were more plentiful in the recent past. Subsidence cannot account for the rapidity of the loss.
@@franklinrussell4750 Oysters, clams, and crabs were being over-caught for a long time while mud flats were being dredged away to ease entry into ports. Remediation campaigns have restored a lot of them.
The ice floats on the water because it is less dense. So when a 1 cubic meter ice sheet melts in the ocean the melted water takes less than 1 cubic meter. Therefore after the melt the overall water level is less. Again the water is denser therefore needs less space than ice.
FYI, land masses can sink and rise. If NY is sinking and that is not factored in, it looks like the ocean is rising that much faster. The mountain range movement is sometimes measured in feet per year.
Geology & Environmental Geosciences || Plate Tectonics | Bucknell ... www.bucknell.edu/academics/...of/.../geology.../geologic...of.../plate-tectonics The first of these is to think in terms of geologic time, measured in millions and ... few feet of movement that accompanied the recent earthquake in Turkey, can have ... About 2 to 5 centimeters per year (1 to 2 inches per year), about the same ... of a continent, is the site of volcanoes, earthquakes, and developing mountains; ... YO feet got in da way dude!
Haha exactly right. The alarmists lose their collective minds when the it's pointed out that the sea level hasn't moved even 1cm in Sydney Harbour in 100 years 😂😂😂
Air has this ability to hold more moisture as it's temperature increases. The sea level rise models have never taken this fact into account, at least not all that goes into the equations neccessary to make accurate forecasts.
Thats not whats making them stronger. We have a 22 % drop in Magnetosphere protection through Pole movement. That lets the energy through to power them more. Cosmic particles etc.
The even scarier component: The gulf stream is bringing a lot of the natural warmth to the northern Atlantic, where it influences the mild weather patterns that are then transported to Europe by the atmospherical jetstream. In the past when ice ages hit Europe, a slowing of the gulf stream was one of the most likely reasons.
and it's even more scarier. the melting ice will reveals some dark sand or dark particle inside that ice. and it will make things more worse because dark colour absorbs heat more than the light color. and those dark sand or particles are also come from the ocean waves. if the sea rising, that means those dark particle can also reach more further. Soo this is like.. we can't go back when the ice melts. Soo i kinda pessimistic about this man-made global warming. With all this condition, seems like we not gonna make it better :"( Unless if we, human, work together as a one community to change the climate change. The key is.. reduce the global human population growth rate. especially for India and some countries in Africa.
@Kay Kay yeah interglacial period is natural thing. BUT THE CURRENT CONDITION IS A PURE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING. Yeah we can only slow it down. That's what we want to do for now! and btw, we can make it stable tho. with the population control and less consumption. the warming and the cooling climate is happening because there are no population control back then and until now. some animals or plants are thriving too much. example, back in the past, some ancient plants are abundant because there are less predator. it makes the increase of oxygen in the atmosphere and the decrease of carbondioxide in the atmosphere because plants absorbs them. and this causes the global cooling era. and because there are more oxygen than the carbondioxide, many of those plants are dying slowly. and those ancient dead forest become the carbon storage. and after millions of year, it turn into coal deposit. and now we digging it. it releases the carbon into the atmosphere again. it will make the earth become the earth in the ancient times if we overexploit the nature and keep breeding like crazy. the point is, if we can control the population and keep the earth's condition stable, we can stop the global warming and global cooling. not only slow it down. srry if my english bad
You seem to believe Greenland and Antarctica are cubes of ice floating on the sea. But Greenland is the largest island in the world and Antarctica is a whole continent. And these land masses have ice on top of them. When that ice melts it flows to the sea increasing sea levels. Even a 8 year old can understand this.
NEXT VIDEO: How CO2 levels of 1,500 PPM happened earlier YET animals and plants THRIVED even with 6C temps higher than today's! I won't hold my breath.
Were humans around? No... Did these changes take millions upon millions of years as opposed to hundreds or thousands? Yes. Rate of change is important here.
They also won't mention the 2050 solar minimum, which threatens to make the earth cooler. They also won't mention how global-warming alarmists have never got any predictions of anything right, ever. Just pay the fear-tax and stop asking questions. I hear that for an extra $99.95 per month, they'll also solve the problem of rogue asteroids. Those man-made rogue-asteroids a big problem.
Why did humans not get agriculture before the last ice age? Just because we survived ot doesn't mean it's a good deal for humans today. Agriculture and fresh water to support over 7 billion people on the planet should be a MAJOR concern.
Volcanoes and natural processes put out magnetudes more CO2 than Humans do. Milankovitch cycles account for a lot more global temperature change Than human activity. Of COURSE the climate changes. It always has and will regardless of human activity. The question is: how much should humans spend and sacrifice in order to effect a fraction of a percent of the overall change? Perhaps we are better off spending to adapt to the inevitable change.
Since you guys will never actually do any research outside of climate deniers on UA-cam, enjoy some links: Ice sheets are melting : www.researchgate.net/publication/222022772_History_of_sea_ice_in_the_Arctic The ocean is rising : wordsinmocean.com/2016/01/06/how-far-will-sea-levels-rise-in-the-next-100-years/ Humans > Volcanos : www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/ Milankovitch cycles: ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/milankovitch-cycles Besides global warming being caused by humans, don't you think moving away from fossil fuels would be better in the long run?
Mr Phwibbs Only people who are deniers are the ones pushing AGW. In science nothing is truly every settle those that believes it is are in truth science deniers.
@@samuraijack1371 Why don't you try to think for yourself. Maybe turn the tv off, and read a scientific journal with an opposing view. Stop worrying about others IQ POINTS, because its a loosing proposition for you.
@@johna7450 thats the issue bud. No one likes to read opposite viewpoints. I read a book once and watched a video where a guy recreated the entire antartica and ice layers with ice cubes. He melted the entire thing and the water did not rise. He concluded that the reason the level of the ocean is rising is because in other places its declining. For example its estimated that an entire piece of land will appear near rio. But if you tell this to someone, they will automatically assume ur crazy and wont do research (im not saying that the ice cube method is a fact, like the heating globe, its a model, a different outlook on things). Science went from people seeing something and creating models to answer what they saw, and then others questioning the model, to automatically assuming science is always right (any scientist will tell you that thats no the case) Also when talking about climate change everyone blames ordinary people and forgets that a private jet emits about 800 galons per mile. So before trying to cut our things, we should first limit celebrities, governments, etc. And no one talks about places that are cooling down, and the shifting poles 🤷
Sorry, can't watch this past 1:15, the "so-called" expert says that the water temperature rises which causes it to EXPAND. Grade 1 science: water expands, all right, but when it FREEZES.
I did a double take when I heard that, but assumed I must have misheard and kept watching. How can they know what they're talking about it they allow such a statement without further explanation?
I wish you had specifically stated that humans didn't cause the glaciers to squish the land down, instead of leaving it as an implied statement. Ambiguity is a great tool for people who want to bury their heads in the sand.
@@CanIHasThisName good thing no one is doing that here. Facts need to be clearly stated and emphasized, not left in ambiguity. This minimizes wasted resources and harm caused by misinformation.
Oceans are constantly rising since the end of Ice Age. They rise at ever decreasing rate. Now it is barely noticable. Expansion of water through the rise of temperature is a myth. Only the upper layer of the water is warming, maybe 10 feet or so. Not much rise such a thin layer can generate through expansion.
And a few months ago an Australian news story reported the sea level in Sydney harbour hasn't changed since records have been taken at fort dennison for over 150 years
One of the best Verge Science videos so far!!! I would love to see one on the melting methane traps in the Siberian Arctic or even on the Bolivian salt flats
I think he said 2.8 mm per year. That’s so dramatic. I’m going put some bricks underneath the legs of my bed to keep me high and dry for another century.
Yes. But water expands when it is heated. The more water, the more expansion. Arguing that melting ice does not cause sea levels to rise is a short sighted argument
@@nickbrekalo8744 Actually if you read my comment carefully you'll see that wasn't my argument. You are correct in saying that the water will expand when heated though, but I think that the expansion due to heating is likely to be negligible as when heated from room temperature to boiling point it only expands by about 4% and projected temperature increases in the ocean are drastically smaller than that difference. My point was that the main contribution to any sea level rise is going to come from melting land ice; which we see in the northern hemisphere in places like Greenland. I wasn't saying that melting ice won't contribute at all.
Water expands when heated up? I don’t know, try putting a cup of water in the sun for a few hours, I don’t see the volume increased, I see the water evaporated and less water in the cup.
It is such a complex problem. Which shows more and more that we need to do something now. We don't know what the effects of this is going to be. For example we don't know all the effects of the Atlantic Ocean conveyer belt slowing to a halt. We saw a couple in the video but what about sea life? What about weather patterns? These are serious issues that most in power don't take serious. Overall amazing videos that brings on many more questions about what is happening and their future effects.
You think that the sea level is rising ? How about the amount of water on a daily basis that we pump out of the under ground water aquifer systems word wide . I believe that Mexico City is sinking into the ground , why ? Because they have removed that much water from the aquifer that it has started to collapse . Mexico City is not the only place that this has occurred . Anyone that is pumping water from an underground aquifer is contributing to land sinkage . All the oil that is being pumped from underground is doing the exact same thing . Have a bit of a think about what I am saying , the resources that we are removing have been holding the earth up like a buffer zone , the more we take the more we are going to sink .yes ice melting in the poles is also real , but natural . That is the big difference , natural is the key here . For time ever more the cycle of ice age and retreat has occurred , there is not a thing that we can do about it , it has always been there , a reset if you like .
what they wont tell you is the ice is hardly decreasing and has increased this year. watch tony heller's videos on them if you actually want to get informed
Increased slightly in the Antarctic, decreasing massively in the Arctic. Also 'this year' is irrelevant. If it decreases by 5% every year for 10 years, then increases by 1% this year, does that balance it out?
@@ariffansar4994 look up "as carbon dioxide increases it has less warming effect" if you want to learn about the real science. co2 would have to double to get one more degree, which would take hundreds of years.
Michael Choe that is true, at least to the naked eye. As the much larger ice caps melt, the gravitational pull they create will dissipate as well, causing the water pulled in around it to flood back out to sea.
Actually there will be less water. Water expands when it freezes therefore making it less dense and allowing it to float. If it did not do this most organisms in the ocean would perish as it froze solid. Also if it wasn't for global warming New York City would still be under 1000 feet of glacial ice.
She explicitly said that sea level rises because the ice that sits on land melts. So that's not like an ice cube in your glass, that's like an ice cube outside of the glass melting into the glass. And yes, when additional water flows into your glass, it will eventually overflow. Shocker.
they are however looking at limited number of variables - & only the one's that support additional rise. Some factors create equilibrium making some aspects less pronounced so this still isn't very thorough. Otherwise this is not something man could stop from occurring even at zero emissions.
Actually no, little will change for the Dutch if a lot of ice melts, due to all of the mechanisms mentioned in this video. Every place will be affected differently! Also, the ground in Western Europe is very stable compared to many other places in the world.
I love that they explain New York sinking by comparing it to a sofa cushion being held up at two ends and a heavy object placed on it and then removed. Who would dare disagree with that kind of science?
@@clivemossmoon3611 As "OUR" Was in quotation marks and capitalised for emphasis, I believe that makes the B in Brains the first word of the written sentence, hence capitalised! For a grammar enforcer, you maybe should try harder in the first instance? Please don't tell me you are also guilty of the other latest fault? Namely "of" to mean "Have"? Have a pleasant evening Clive! Funny how your name is not capitalised either?
If water expands due to higher temperatures, doesn't land expand as well? Would that create an equilibrium or would land perhaps expand more than water?
By the way, changes in groundwater storage also contributes to global sea level rise. In addition, sea level could rise even further than anticipated, since the West Antarctic ice sheets are heading towards irreversible collapse. The ocean eats the ice away and the grounding line retreats causing the ice to merge into the ocean.
Yes, they are, eventually, due to an extra 2 degrees/m^2 of radiative forcing, caused primarily by excess CO2. Now, the sun averages exactly 164 degrees/m^2 over the whole planet, all the time. Thus, that's like the sun actually getting a percent or so brighter, even though it's dimming by about 0.15% or so, due to lessenned sunspot activity!
C02 has very little warning effect on the atmosphere. H20 has a much larger effect on the earth's temperature. also that big yellow thing that's up in the sky
DavidFMayerPhD Don’t be so ignorant. Sea level rising is dangerous even if it doesn’t pose a problem now in some areas. However you shouldn’t be so careless on assuming thing.
Quote "the earth started warming up 20,000 years ago" - I don't expect humans had anything to do with that. Thanks for that little nugget of honesty, not often seen in climate videos.
Peter Read - I suggest you read www.science.org.au/learning/general-audience/science-climate-change/6-how-are-sea-levels-changing . Where did you get your data from - did you pull it out of your arse?
He does the melting experiment on a table surface not water.ofcourse you see waterincrease!!!try the glass water and ice cubes experiment and debunk that "scientist ????" Just check who's paying her and discover she's fake
Same around England, have lived by sea all my long life, and no, hasn't risen. Erosion yes, but that's easily, and has been, addressed. World is a globe...risen by a millimetre? I call bs, NEVER has....funded scientists will say anything to maintain lucrative funding, simple....
Full stop 🛑 You said “As the Antarctic melts” as you hit the ice cube with the hair dryer. Are you aware the Antarctic ice cap has been growing since 2013? Are you aware certain (well chosen) measurement points in NY actually sinking?
The Antarctic ice cap, parts of it at least have been growing because a warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, thus more snowfall in the areas that have warmed closer to zero degrees but are not yet above freezing. In the parts of Antarctica where temperatures have risen above zero, the collapse has begun.
Ever wonder what part of National AERONAUTIC and SPACE Administration has anything to do with the climate on earth? Could NASA be involved in climate because it's a government agency and therefor can easily be controlled? Are you aware of all the guess work involved in climate change data? Are you aware that NASA and NOAA falsified data to get the results they want? Do you know the truth behind the "97% scientists agree" statement? Do you know that figure comes from a 2 question poll of cherry picked people and that 75 out of 77 of them agreed on the answer to one of those questions? I guarantee you if you look into this, you will discover a lot of proof exposing this hoax. Start with Tony Heller right here on UA-cam. Ever wonder why that little note on what global warming appears on all UA-cam videos? Notice how it doesn't INSIST you believe in global warming. Instead, it parades itself as truth, just quietly enough to let you convince yourself that there is a problem. The problem is those pushing the hoax and why they are doing it. As usual, follow the money.
I’d rather give trillion of dollars and way more power to the UN. wouldn't you? Lol They had us fooled for a minute but thankfully we figured out big climate is out of control.
You make a valid point, except: Many of the populations most likely to be affected can barely survive as it is and they cannot afford a Uhaul or to buy a new home. These people are going to be desperate, desperate enough to do almost anything to survive. The biggest danger of global warming and rising sea levels, especially at the unprecedented rate that they are occurring, is the conflicts that are likely to result. Several hundred million people, at a minimum, are going to have to move over a few decades at most. Consider what the political blowback to only a million of so immigrants to the EU since the instability in the middle east caused many to leave in search of a safer place to live. What do you suppose is going to happen when that number become not a million but 100 million? Then add to this mix the fact that so much of the infrastructure of so many wealthy countries is located only a few meters above sea level. It will cost America many trillions of dollars to save NYC, Boston, New Orleans, Miami, LA, the central valley of Calif where the majority of produce in America comes from, etc.
Fact: sea level rise hasn’t gotten quicker in the last few years. It has been steadily rising since the last ice age. Fact: Antarctica’s amount of ice has increased. Fact: sea levels won’t rise because of the melting of the North Pole because it is already floating(like ice in water, when it melts the water level doesn’t rise).
Which strange phenomena would you like to see recreated in the studio next?
exploding whales.
Fermi paradox
My ex
tsunamis
Rotating binary stars with the gama ray bursts
Flat Earthers are not going to like this one!
We need Flat Oceaners now
They're too busy with Kavanaugh at the moment.
Nugget's news I was thinking the same thing. One wonders why plate tectonics have yet to push a continent over the edge. I guess angles are on guard to keep that from happening. Wrestling angels cause earth quakes. 🤼♂️
ahri haha neither do you
True story
"humans didn't cause this, its a 100,000 year process."
be more careful, this is exactly the kind of statement that get's misinterpreted.
Well, that's still true, we didn't cause the warming in the first place, but we are surely accelerating it and making it worse !
Yet it's true, and you know it. He's shown scientifically how sea levels can rise with or without humans. Don't let your bias cloud which scientific facts you decide to accept or reject.
@@MrWitz90 it's the rate that's the problem
Global warming is accelerating. It wasn't caused by humans but it's being accelerated because of us.
Even if the Earth was heating naturally (which it is), and humans had nothing to do with it (we are certainly accelerating it), what are we supposed to do about it? I agree that we should do whatever we can to reduce our impact on the environment, but I wonder if humans should go a step further and attempt to resist climate change entirely? Is it even possible?
Maybe the land is sinking with all those heavy buildings.
Maybe it's erosion.
Maybe it's Maybelline.
Doom And Gloom wtf, land is mighter than heavy building, l. Heavy building has nothing to do with the land.
Doom And Gloom how does a building affect weight on earth, wasn’t the resources used in that building found in the Earth?
@@fencingvhgusbd If you concentrate a large amount of mass on a smaller spot, you will sink.
The constant movement of the water table and effects of rain make the buildings on the land sink.
Just like standing on mud.
You could take erosion into account, just like standing in the wet sand at the beach.
@@berreyl1689 yeah, explain how we replenish all waters we have taken
Sea level is lowering in Sweden, maybe land rising.
If it gets warmer 1/2 of the people in the north won't go south every winter. They will use less CO2, which will make it colder, and then they will go south again. If we pay a carbon tax to stop the carbon cycle maybe this cycle will stop.
Something like that.
The host appears to be holding an invisible watermelon for the whole video.
WOAH!!! You are very attentive.
Lol I laughed so hard it’s so true
It seems that's a prerequisite for being a Vox host. He's not the only one they have that does that.
Which fruit should I hold in the next video? - Cory
@@VergeScience hold some sea urchins plzz
I'm not going to lie, this video told me a lot of things I didn't know about rising sea level! This was very informative, unlike some videos that reuse common knowledge. Keep up the good work!
Well, to be fair, it IS all common knowledge, only not many people understand the connections. And others simply don't want to, because it would destroy their illusions. I expect to see more of these, as long as science remains non-heretical.
if you mute the video.. and theres no one around to hear it.. does it show common knowledge..
Add three more:
1/ Tidal forces from the moon
2/ Barometric pressures
3/ Water stacking based on wind
True, but these are more temporary (hours/days/weeks) than what was discussed in this video, which explais sea level rise in the long-term (decades to centuries).
@@samueleide Sediments from the land flowing into the ocean. When dust from mountains winds up at the bottom of the ocean the sea level has to go up.
When I see a US UA-camr using metric system, I like it. Simple.
hankeybillfred ... yes a system based on 10s where you only have to shift a decimal when changing units. The only thing inferior is your thought process.
Thanks for using metric system for us 95% of world population to understand ☺
@@eds6889 they call petrol which is a liquid, Gas!
So don't bother explaining metric system.
@hankeybillfred
Yes I can. By saying a third of a better.
hankeybillfred why exactly can't we break things perfectly into thirds in the metric system? Wtf?
Wow! Sea level rise is a lot more interesting than I first thought - thanks for the video! :)
Definitely! This was fascinating to learn about - geological time scales (like with the New York part of the video) are always just pretty mind blowing to think about too! What's your favourite type of science?
Lol I was just thinking the same exact thing
I'd not say interesting, i'd say fucking horrifying, but hey, different points of view i guess...
And fucking sad
Yes, true! Very scary stuff...
"It is a dynamic Earth" Awesome quote
With a dynamic sun.
then we need a new EARTHODYNAMICS subject
@@schmunterlm We are studying both.
Therefore the term ‘climate change’ is meaningless because the climate, like everything else, never was and never will be static.
These objects they use for examples is *ON POINT*
Are on point*
KSI- ON POINT REFERENCE LOL 🤣
If we can make cold and hot water , why can't we make a hot and cold fire.
@@theclutch4953 because fire isnt a state of matter....
I really hate that some Americans believe this is a partisan issue. The school system really needs a major overhaul cause it's failed so many people.
I think it's preposterous that some people believe that climate change is not normal. The climate isn't supposed to stay the same all the time.
@@alexocasio-gomez5267 Chimay change is natural yes, however us humans have sped up the rate at which it occurs.
If climate change is normal then it's not bad. Humans didn't make the climate change and we can't make it stay the same.
Erika Erikson death is also normal yet humans still use medicine to live longer. In the case of climate change, humans are accelerating the process and we can slow it down if we really try using technology
Well it kind of is. Climate change is obviously real. I mean we live on islands floating on an asymmetrical condensed ball of lava flying around a way bigger ball of plasma having a constant chain reaction creating absurd amounts of heat and light in an elliptical orbit. Yes there is very obviously going to be common and drastic changes to climate in the large scale of things. However, what is partisan about it is who or what's fault current changes are and what we should do about it.
wasn't New York supposed to be underwater by now?
Yes,That's what Al Gore said back in the 90s when he was the VP
its like those dooms day guys who say the world is gonna end march 4th and then march 5th they have MORE followers
one blunt man lol yes watch tony Heller! ua-cam.com/video/e82smfcypUc/v-deo.html
Ya what the funk
No, not according to the science that's done on it. Maybe you should read actual scientific works and not what tabloids wrote 30 years ago. And no, Al Gore - whether he actually said it or not - is also not a scientific source of information and yes, politicians and activists - and even experts - can say wrong things because they're human and can get things confused. Scientific papers count, nothing else, not the word of policians, scientistis ect. , only the actual research and peer-reviewed meta studies.
Just drink more water. Duh
😂😂😂🤣🤣
And pee after duh
and stop pissing in the oceans
Aeri Kang buT ur body absorbs uses most of the water so peeing would only be putting out a little bit of it
freeze your pee that should help
Our livespans is so short compared to earthly changes that we think everythig is static
More interesting to me is that we have to keep rediscovering everything about every thirty years or so, even though we have books stretching back millennia. One of those books said it would all get hot & muggy, and the oceans would rise, and the winds would blow, and the earth would shake, then it would all end in a lake of fire. Most fascinating is that now that it's actually happening, we believe it less than ever. I can only ASSUME that's because we don't want to accept the blame.
I like it when he says and highlights "Humans didn't cause this" and she ends it with "It's not static, it is dynamic (the Earth). Maybe the same thing can be said about climate change! Wow, what a revelation! What a shocker! The Earth actually changes on its own!
I love these videos, they are so informative
100% agree! Learnt so much from this one video! Which is your top Verge Science video so far???
@@TommoCarroll I liked the sand one because it was explaining an issue that many people don't think about.
Make sure you trust everyone from NYC and colleges everyone. They're right because they must be.
That *was* a great one, especially for that reason! Are you a big science fan generally?
Yeah, I love science
So when you go to the beach ...
STOP PEEING IN THE WATER .
I love the little detail at 2:23 of the edited text still being there on the wide shot
Benjamin Meijer brilliant
And how the word goes behind his hand when he puts the ice cube down
In other news, Obama just bought a beach house in Martha's Vineyard. He's apparently unconcerned.
yes, how about that. My question is: The Obama's came to the White House with less that 1 million in the bank. Now he's buying a 14 Million $$ mansion beachfront property--WOW-- Where did he get the money? Oh they say "book deal" WRONG.
Politicians, they just keep on stealing and lying all the way to the bank.
@@evallian Royalties from his books.
Because the banks would loan money to people knowing they will not get a return on said loan. And shouldn't the coastline be gone by now?
I don’t give a living fuck about Obama, it dosen’t make science more or less true.
The fact that Obama isn't concerned doesn't change the facts of climate change.
I'll consider worrying when Al Gore sells his $8.9 million dollar beachfront mansion in Montecito, California.
I'm confused, what does Al Gore have to do with climate change? Al Gore is neither a climate scientist, nor does his preferences in property purchases have anything to do with climate change. Al Gore will be dead before rising sea level has much effect on his coastal property, in the meantime he likely wants to spend his final years sitting on the beach.
Show me any sea level chart that has any rate change over the long term. They said it in the video. All stations are moving with tectonic action over long term not warming. If co2 was warming up planet and ocean it would rate change. They are not if you look at individual stations.
@@phugwad Al Gore was the man who pushed for global warming, making statements like no more ice sheets before 2010 and that your children will not know what snow is, because it will be so warm.
@@GerryCapoVideoVault are you an inbred or a mistake that didn't get flushed down a toilet.
Maybe he just has the money to throw around?
STOP PEEING IN THE WATER AT THE BEACH!
Jeez! I mean really, THAT'S what's causing the rising sea level...
itsa almosta 90 percenta peee
@@xitzlucky7x In simple science when ice melts in water, the level does not rise.
Every little helps I guess, but its mainly due to all the rivers emptying themselves into the sea. Its amazing that there is any low-lying land left.
Des Kavanagh actually the earth has a self filtering system that involves mountains and elevation and even the axis itself and the shift of the tilt in our axis making the effect we see involving the water levels rising and falling... we get fresh water again from these rise and falls as well as every other factor I just mentioned.
Mr PumperKnuckles I live in San Francisco, and we haven’t seen one iota of sea level rise in the 50+ years that I have been here in the Bay Area. So it’s all bologna! Proof that the sea should rise the same everywhere, is that when a tsunami hits, the level of water out in the ocean is the same. The only way it changes in height, is by the amount of water being funneled into a bay or cove is of such a massive amount with a lot of power behind it to push it up the walls of a cove. But when there is no massive amount of water, with no power behind it, and only a minimal amount, then the rise of the sea level will not affect coasts much. Dare I say, imperceptibly. Think about trying to measure something that has so many variables to it like the oceans. It’s impossible to say, that they can measure a millimeter of sea level change and attribute it to manmade climate change. So just look with common sense and it’s easy to see that this is a more nefarious plot to force socialism on the free world. Proof: look at Greta, et al. Do they ever condemn China or India? Is she going there? Nope! Does she even condemn them from afar? Nope! You gotta ask yourself: Why is that? The answer is obvious.
We all need to contribute by drinking the waters of the rising oceans
😂😂😂
Lets get climate change deniers to drink it.
Encourage the growth of sponges
Take it you don’t urinate?
Simply use it for farmland irrigation during water shortages, thus solving two problems at once. Genius! 😉
I love her laugh, she's like an adorable mad scientist
yessss!!
Geologically active. Fascinating.
As a geography major and climatology minor in my 3rd year at university I was thoroughly impressed with this video. You did a great job explaining the different components of sea level rise. Of course it had to be simplified for this video, but the comparisons and explanations you provided definitely conveyed the right ideas
And here we are 5 years later and still no rise.
'Humans didnt cause this' should have been more specific to the land sinking, some people will go and regurgitate to others humans didnt cause this, when speaking about global warming and maybe come up with their own conclusio. and since your video is well reasearched it will just reasseart their ignorance about global warming, then the lie will become the truth. Nice video.😉
Didn't you hear, scientists are now saying humans didn't cause global warming. It's a naturally occurring event, the earth warms and cools naturally. The story now is humans are speeding up the warming process. Stop living in the past and catch up already.
@@artfuldodganz9037 Haha no they arent! I know some of them. Citation needed.
He's giving facts. he's not supporting either political belief.
Brilliant scientists are on both sides of the debate, and there is un-conclusive data supporting both beliefs.
Fact is, we just don't know. Anyone who tells you otherwise based on data from 2018 is not a scientist- they're a politician.
@@Ranstone That so highly incorrect, we know pretty much the mechanics that go into our climate and drivers of past climate events. We know for a fact the current driver is being accelerate dramatically by us. There are over 12k journals and that explain this topic. There isnt really a debate on rather it is occurring, there is also not a debate on the effects we will feel. The only debate is the severity and how soon, and they are even in agreement it will be bad.
Potholer54 is a great communicator himself. Goes over the information.
@@Ranstone The data isn't inconclusive at all. The vast majority of scientists agree that the climate changes we are facing right now are man-made and will have severe consequences. Those with money invested in fossil fuels will probably want to tell you the opposite.
Great video. I'm glad to finally see someone talk about natural subsidence.
There are some locations along the coast of Alaska that have seen a 3 foot drop in average sea level. Yup, the land is rising. The earth is a living planet where things naturally change.
I'm sorry, I'm still not over the ocean not being flat.
@@gucci5320 that would just be from the curvature of the earth. Not the "hills and valleys" that they mentioned in this video.
It might help to think about how the mass of the moon affects the oceans in the form of tides. You can actually see the water pulling away and coming back on shore by the force of gravity. The moon's surface area is about 14.6 million square miles, which is less than the total surface area of the continent of Asia (17.2 million square miles). The Earth weighs 81 times more than the moon and the moon's gravitational force is only about 16.6 percent of Earth's gravity.
sarahj6795 because you're stupid and you've been had!
Whatever happened to the trees using CO2? HUH?
KamekoBruns thank you!
Everyone has some bug in their brains making them capitulate to stupid nonsense like this
Man your guys videos are always intresting to watch!
Always bring a unique angle to a topic don't they?
One of the most objective videos on the topic! That is really great to see! Well explained and very scientific! Congratulations!
dr curries videos are even better.
Fascinating. Need more videos like this.
Have you factored in subsidence? The New Jersey shore right through Long Island has been sinking for years, accounting for about 1/3 of the apparent "rise" of the ocean.
Could watch the vid
Because most of the beaches in NJ should never have been where they are in the first place. In the 90's they spent YEARS dredging up the sand and expanding the beaches. If those beaches get pulled back into the sea don't give me any rising sea level BS as an excuse. Sandy Hook at one point in the 70's was about to be an Island but they really built up the sand between parking lot B and C, that strip of land was rapidly declining until they expanded it. If it returns to how it naturally was you can't blame global warming/sea levels for it.
Satellite images of the world's mudflats show they are disappearing along with the creatures adapted to
the mudflats. If you read historical accounts about oysters, clams, and crabs they were more plentiful
in the recent past. Subsidence cannot account for the rapidity of the loss.
Literally 1/3 of the video is about the subsidence of land around New York. Did you even bother watching the video?
@@franklinrussell4750 Oysters, clams, and crabs were being over-caught for a long time while mud flats were being dredged away to ease entry into ports. Remediation campaigns have restored a lot of them.
The ice floats on the water because it is less dense. So when a 1 cubic meter ice sheet melts in the ocean the melted water takes less than 1 cubic meter. Therefore after the melt the overall water level is less. Again the water is denser therefore needs less space than ice.
look up old pictures of sea side attractions from around the world and compare them to today!! sea levels apart from coastal erosion hasn't changed!
Average is a word.
Learn to swim? Would it help if all New Yorkers jumped in the ocean thereby relieving downward pressure?
If they all jumped in the ocean, water would overflow into Manhattan like getting into a full bathtub. ;-)
FYI, land masses can sink and rise. If NY is sinking and that is not factored in, it looks like the ocean is rising that much faster.
The mountain range movement is sometimes measured in feet per year.
Geology & Environmental Geosciences || Plate Tectonics | Bucknell ...
www.bucknell.edu/academics/...of/.../geology.../geologic...of.../plate-tectonics
The first of these is to think in terms of geologic time, measured in millions and ... few feet of movement that accompanied the recent earthquake in Turkey, can have ... About 2 to 5 centimeters per year (1 to 2 inches per year), about the same ... of a continent, is the site of volcanoes, earthquakes, and developing mountains; ...
YO feet got in da way dude!
Could all the concrete and steel that is added to NYC every year have anything to do with it sinking?
No, land sinks land rises. There is a lot going on underneath.
Coastal areas are known to compact over time, producing an effect that those who don't know better may see as a rise in sea level.
Could we please see the tide gauge data from the port of New York?
The actual UNADJUSTED data?
Cheers,
Jim
That would not fit the agenda.
Haha exactly right. The alarmists lose their collective minds when the it's pointed out that the sea level hasn't moved even 1cm in Sydney Harbour in 100 years 😂😂😂
Air has this ability to hold more moisture as it's temperature increases. The sea level rise models have never taken this fact into account, at least not all that goes into the equations neccessary to make accurate forecasts.
Absolutely true but this also makes hurricanes more common and stronger.
Thats not whats making them stronger. We have a 22 % drop in Magnetosphere protection through Pole movement. That lets the energy through to power them more. Cosmic particles etc.
@@blahblah2062 Um.. okay?
Wonder how much water in our oceans is displaced by 50 to 55 thousand cruise ships,freighters ,fishing trawlers etc,all being at sea at the same time?
Joe beetz and more people on pleasure holidays , swimming in the sea
New York is sinking because New Jersey is also getting heavier. I guess Chris Christie ate at the buffet again.
bruh I live in New Jersey 😂😂
The even scarier component: The gulf stream is bringing a lot of the natural warmth to the northern Atlantic, where it influences the mild weather patterns that are then transported to Europe by the atmospherical jetstream. In the past when ice ages hit Europe, a slowing of the gulf stream was one of the most likely reasons.
and it's even more scarier. the melting ice will reveals some dark sand or dark particle inside that ice. and it will make things more worse because dark colour absorbs heat more than the light color.
and those dark sand or particles are also come from the ocean waves. if the sea rising, that means those dark particle can also reach more further.
Soo this is like.. we can't go back when the ice melts.
Soo i kinda pessimistic about this man-made global warming. With all this condition, seems like we not gonna make it better :"(
Unless if we, human, work together as a one community to change the climate change. The key is.. reduce the global human population growth rate. especially for India and some countries in Africa.
80% of co2 come from...
@Kay Kay yeah interglacial period is natural thing. BUT THE CURRENT CONDITION IS A PURE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING.
Yeah we can only slow it down. That's what we want to do for now!
and btw, we can make it stable tho. with the population control and less consumption. the warming and the cooling climate is happening because there are no population control back then and until now.
some animals or plants are thriving too much.
example, back in the past, some ancient plants are abundant because there are less predator. it makes the increase of oxygen in the atmosphere and the decrease of carbondioxide in the atmosphere because plants absorbs them. and this causes the global cooling era.
and because there are more oxygen than the carbondioxide, many of those plants are dying slowly. and those ancient dead forest become the carbon storage. and after millions of year, it turn into coal deposit. and now we digging it. it releases the carbon into the atmosphere again. it will make the earth become the earth in the ancient times if we overexploit the nature and keep breeding like crazy.
the point is, if we can control the population and keep the earth's condition stable, we can stop the global warming and global cooling. not only slow it down.
srry if my english bad
But if the Ice Age starts, ice is formed and the process is reversed.
We should get rid of the Gulf Stream then
Fill a cup with ice and water. The ice will melt, but the cup won’t over flow. Water levels in New York are the same as they were 100 years ago.
You seem to believe Greenland and Antarctica are cubes of ice floating on the sea. But Greenland is the largest island in the world and Antarctica is a whole continent. And these land masses have ice on top of them. When that ice melts it flows to the sea increasing sea levels. Even a 8 year old can understand this.
Smartest climate denier.
stuff like this makes me realize how small we are on this sandbox we call Earth
More like the fish tank we call earth 😉
You think THAT'S impressive, you should try going into outer space... You get a real sense for how unlikely we are to ever meet any Vulcans!
NEXT VIDEO: How CO2 levels of 1,500 PPM happened earlier YET animals and plants THRIVED even with 6C temps higher than today's!
I won't hold my breath.
Were humans around? No... Did these changes take millions upon millions of years as opposed to hundreds or thousands? Yes. Rate of change is important here.
They also won't mention the 2050 solar minimum, which threatens to make the earth cooler.
They also won't mention how global-warming alarmists have never got any predictions of anything right, ever.
Just pay the fear-tax and stop asking questions. I hear that for an extra $99.95 per month, they'll also solve the problem of rogue asteroids. Those man-made rogue-asteroids a big problem.
Why did humans not get agriculture before the last ice age? Just because we survived ot doesn't mean it's a good deal for humans today. Agriculture and fresh water to support over 7 billion people on the planet should be a MAJOR concern.
@@robotnoir5299 Oh they do but it's not enough to make a dent in anything. Solar cycles are well known.
Which was long before humans evolved, because for us even 1000 ppm already has health dangers.
I'm studying Biology and I'm currently doing the course Marine Sciences. Thanks for making this video, cause it really helped me understand!
But Antarctica's ice has been growing not melting.
John Edwards Cooling or Heating.. It’s climate change
Volcanoes and natural processes put out magnetudes more CO2 than Humans do. Milankovitch cycles account for a lot more global temperature change Than human activity.
Of COURSE the climate changes. It always has and will regardless of human activity. The question is: how much should humans spend and sacrifice in order to effect a fraction of a percent of the overall change? Perhaps we are better off spending to adapt to the inevitable change.
Since you guys will never actually do any research outside of climate deniers on UA-cam, enjoy some links:
Ice sheets are melting : www.researchgate.net/publication/222022772_History_of_sea_ice_in_the_Arctic
The ocean is rising : wordsinmocean.com/2016/01/06/how-far-will-sea-levels-rise-in-the-next-100-years/
Humans > Volcanos : www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/
Milankovitch cycles: ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/milankovitch-cycles
Besides global warming being caused by humans, don't you think moving away from fossil fuels would be better in the long run?
Mr Phwibbs Only people who are deniers are the ones pushing AGW. In science nothing is truly every settle those that believes it is are in truth science deniers.
@@DanksterPaws It's funny how you keep changing the name depending on the outcome of past predictions. I now predict Al Gore is swimming in money.
I didn't hear anything about the massive amounts of sand being taken from the oceans for construction. Dig a bit deeper on that. Pun intended.
We might change ocean surface topography. Not by much probably.
Are you implying that is the cause of sea level rise? Makes you sound like an inbred. It's people like you that lower the avg IQ of US
@@samuraijack1371 Why don't you try to think for yourself. Maybe turn the tv off, and read a scientific journal with an opposing view. Stop worrying about others IQ POINTS, because its a loosing proposition for you.
@@johna7450 thats the issue bud. No one likes to read opposite viewpoints. I read a book once and watched a video where a guy recreated the entire antartica and ice layers with ice cubes. He melted the entire thing and the water did not rise. He concluded that the reason the level of the ocean is rising is because in other places its declining. For example its estimated that an entire piece of land will appear near rio. But if you tell this to someone, they will automatically assume ur crazy and wont do research (im not saying that the ice cube method is a fact, like the heating globe, its a model, a different outlook on things). Science went from people seeing something and creating models to answer what they saw, and then others questioning the model, to automatically assuming science is always right (any scientist will tell you that thats no the case)
Also when talking about climate change everyone blames ordinary people and forgets that a private jet emits about 800 galons per mile. So before trying to cut our things, we should first limit celebrities, governments, etc. And no one talks about places that are cooling down, and the shifting poles 🤷
Sorry, can't watch this past 1:15, the "so-called" expert says that the water temperature rises which causes it to EXPAND. Grade 1 science: water expands, all right, but when it FREEZES.
I did a double take when I heard that, but assumed I must have misheard and kept watching. How can they know what they're talking about it they allow such a statement without further explanation?
I wish you had specifically stated that humans didn't cause the glaciers to squish the land down, instead of leaving it as an implied statement. Ambiguity is a great tool for people who want to bury their heads in the sand.
@my opinion is irrelevant but yeah if you take that out of context, thanks to his poor phrasing it is misinformative.
Applying political convictions to science is sheer idiocy.
@@CanIHasThisName good thing no one is doing that here. Facts need to be clearly stated and emphasized, not left in ambiguity. This minimizes wasted resources and harm caused by misinformation.
people take a glass with water and ice in it. let the ice melt. the level of water stays the same
Most of the ice is on land. Take a sink full of water, and push a mass of ice from the counter into it; the water level will rise.
Are you a bear? 🐻
@@JacksonHinton you know it 🐻
@@Manormouse-04 so if its on land htf is it getting in the ocean to that level
@@onebluntman10, by melting, because the temperature is rising.
Oceans are constantly rising since the end of Ice Age. They rise at ever decreasing rate. Now it is barely noticable. Expansion of water through the rise of temperature is a myth. Only the upper layer of the water is warming, maybe 10 feet or so. Not much rise such a thin layer can generate through expansion.
But NASA, using updated ocean sensors a few years ago noted the Pacific ocean is actually receding. Go Figure!
Show us a reference so we can go to it.
@@fppro1679 NASA
@@markgasster6638 if you know the link put it in.
And a few months ago an Australian news story reported the sea level in Sydney harbour hasn't changed since records have been taken at fort dennison for over 150 years
@@markgasster6638 www.nasa.org.gov/wehaveahugebudgetwithanicestudioandlotsofoverpaidactors,htm
One of the best Verge Science videos so far!!! I would love to see one on the melting methane traps in the Siberian Arctic or even on the Bolivian salt flats
Erlend Bjorklund Methane traps?
I think he said 2.8 mm per year. That’s so dramatic. I’m going put some bricks underneath the legs of my bed to keep me high and dry for another century.
Melting *sea* ice cannot cause sea levels to rise. Melting land ice however can.
Yes. But water expands when it is heated. The more water, the more expansion. Arguing that melting ice does not cause sea levels to rise is a short sighted argument
@@nickbrekalo8744
Actually if you read my comment carefully you'll see that wasn't my argument. You are correct in saying that the water will expand when heated though, but I think that the expansion due to heating is likely to be negligible as when heated from room temperature to boiling point it only expands by about 4% and projected temperature increases in the ocean are drastically smaller than that difference.
My point was that the main contribution to any sea level rise is going to come from melting land ice; which we see in the northern hemisphere in places like Greenland. I wasn't saying that melting ice won't contribute at all.
Isn't it possible that the combined weight of buildings & people on essentially an island could be exerting downward force?
Bring in the scientific method and find our result!
That's also a factor.
Water expands when heated up? I don’t know, try putting a cup of water in the sun for a few hours, I don’t see the volume increased, I see the water evaporated and less water in the cup.
It is such a complex problem. Which shows more and more that we need to do something now. We don't know what the effects of this is going to be. For example we don't know all the effects of the Atlantic Ocean conveyer belt slowing to a halt. We saw a couple in the video but what about sea life? What about weather patterns? These are serious issues that most in power don't take serious.
Overall amazing videos that brings on many more questions about what is happening and their future effects.
Alexvandy35
Slowing of the current would actually make local climate colder instead.
So this whole time he's talking about global warming and ice melting then he quickly mentions that New York's land is actually sinking.
You think that the sea level is rising ? How about the amount of water on a daily basis that we pump out of the under ground water aquifer systems word wide . I believe that Mexico City is sinking into the ground , why ? Because they have removed that much water from the aquifer that it has started to collapse . Mexico City is not the only place that this has occurred . Anyone that is pumping water from an underground aquifer is contributing to land sinkage . All the oil that is being pumped from underground is doing the exact same thing . Have a bit of a think about what I am saying , the resources that we are removing have been holding the earth up like a buffer zone , the more we take the more we are going to sink .yes ice melting in the poles is also real , but natural . That is the big difference , natural is the key here . For time ever more the cycle of ice age and retreat has occurred , there is not a thing that we can do about it , it has always been there , a reset if you like .
Useful content
Useful comment
@Kay Kay liking it
Hasn’t these effects on water be true for millions of years? So this change is normal.
The land is sinking, the sea levels are not rising. Jakarta and Manila cities are sinking.
what they wont tell you is the ice is hardly decreasing and has increased this year. watch tony heller's videos on them if you actually want to get informed
Increased slightly in the Antarctic, decreasing massively in the Arctic. Also 'this year' is irrelevant. If it decreases by 5% every year for 10 years, then increases by 1% this year, does that balance it out?
Bruh. Heard this bull before. It was debunked.
@@ariffansar4994 look up "as carbon dioxide increases it has less warming effect" if you want to learn about the real science. co2 would have to double to get one more degree, which would take hundreds of years.
I thought melting ice in a cup doesn’t increase the water level cause the volume is the same
Michael Choe that is true, at least to the naked eye. As the much larger ice caps melt, the gravitational pull they create will dissipate as well, causing the water pulled in around it to flood back out to sea.
There is a lot of bullshit science out there about global warming I would suggest watching some videos from Tony heller
But not all the ice is in the sea. The ice on lsand melting would be the biggest problem.
This is true for sea ice, but the ice in mountain glaciers, on Greenland, and Antarctica will raise sea level as they melt.
Actually there will be less water. Water expands when it freezes therefore making it less dense and allowing it to float. If it did not do this most organisms in the ocean would perish as it froze solid. Also if it wasn't for global warming New York City would still be under 1000 feet of glacial ice.
and how much is the sea level rising? I did not hear that in the video?
I watched my ice in my glass melt...and it did not overflow...
Well happily that has nothing to do with the reality of sea levels,... Soooo have another drink.
@@benwilms3942 Not to mention, neither does global warming. Funny how people ask us to rely on information that can't be tested by anyone.
She explicitly said that sea level rises because the ice that sits on land melts. So that's not like an ice cube in your glass, that's like an ice cube outside of the glass melting into the glass. And yes, when additional water flows into your glass, it will eventually overflow. Shocker.
thank you for creating such awareness videos keep going!
None of this is news but I'm glad people are being reminded of the science involved in understanding sea level rise. Thanks for that.
they are however looking at limited number of variables - & only the one's that support additional rise. Some factors create equilibrium making some aspects less pronounced so this still isn't very thorough. Otherwise this is not something man could stop from occurring even at zero emissions.
guess the dutch will need more windmills to pump all that water out :)
srsly, it's amazing how they keep themselved from just drowing
Pickle Rick bedankt man
Actually no, little will change for the Dutch if a lot of ice melts, due to all of the mechanisms mentioned in this video.
Every place will be affected differently!
Also, the ground in Western Europe is very stable compared to many other places in the world.
@@TheEVEInspiration the last drought did actually effect the ground in the Netherlands to drop/sink faster than normally sadly.
Al Gore bought a beach front property valued at $9 million , nuff said. (find it on ytube)
I love that they explain New York sinking by comparing it to a sofa cushion being held up at two ends and a heavy object placed on it and then removed. Who would dare disagree with that kind of science?
ay. its a bit like oceans rising and lands sinking. Identically opposite. hm..
"We tried to figure it out for ourselves, but are brains started hurting, so we did what we always do: called an expert."
"OUR" Brains, please!
@@rogerblackwood8815 Don't capitalize "Brains" when lowercase required. PLEASE!!
@@clivemossmoon3611 As "OUR" Was in quotation marks and capitalised for emphasis, I believe that makes the B in Brains the first word of the written sentence, hence capitalised! For a grammar enforcer, you maybe should try harder in the first instance? Please don't tell me you are also guilty of the other latest fault? Namely "of" to mean "Have"? Have a pleasant evening Clive! Funny how your name is not capitalised either?
Didn't Obama just buy a seashore mansion??
If water expands due to higher temperatures, doesn't land expand as well? Would that create an equilibrium or would land perhaps expand more than water?
Great work guys
fantastic video
One of the best videos on UA-cam
By the way, changes in groundwater storage also contributes to global sea level rise. In addition, sea level could rise even further than anticipated, since the West Antarctic ice sheets are heading towards irreversible collapse. The ocean eats the ice away and the grounding line retreats causing the ice to merge into the ocean.
The Antarctic ice sheets are in no danger of collapsing.
Yes, they are, eventually, due to an extra 2 degrees/m^2 of radiative forcing, caused primarily by excess CO2. Now, the sun averages exactly 164 degrees/m^2 over the whole planet, all the time. Thus, that's like the sun actually getting a percent or so brighter, even though it's dimming by about 0.15% or so, due to lessenned sunspot activity!
Good catch! I meant watts.
The sea level would only rise 5ft.
Antarctica is freezing more than it is melting.
This is interesting
Okay my doubt is that the water level of a bucket full of water with a cube of ice will never increase even if the ice melts.
That's true, but there are ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica that will cause sea levels to rise because they're on land.
C02 has very little warning effect on the atmosphere. H20 has a much larger effect on the earth's temperature.
also that big yellow thing that's up in the sky
5:11 you heard it here first folks
great information to have... thanks for let us know...👍
"Sea Level Rise" depends upon the measurement station and is otherwise meaningless.
DavidFMayerPhD Don’t be so ignorant. Sea level rising is dangerous even if it doesn’t pose a problem now in some areas. However you shouldn’t be so careless on assuming thing.
@@davanahill9218 Sea level has been rising for centuries at a very slow rate. There is nothing to worry about in the short run.
Totally downplays human impact on acceleration of sea level rise and the full effects of global warming. Change must be made.
Lol what drivel
Quote "the earth started warming up 20,000 years ago" - I don't expect humans had anything to do with that. Thanks for that little nugget of honesty, not often seen in climate videos.
I feel like this isn't true. It doesn't make sense at all.
Watching this after walking through the Jan 2019 polar vortex.🌬💨❄️
Excellent presentation.
This is a load of bull. Sea level data, continuously recorded around Australia since 1914, shows NO rise.
Peter Read - I suggest you read www.science.org.au/learning/general-audience/science-climate-change/6-how-are-sea-levels-changing . Where did you get your data from - did you pull it out of your arse?
He does the melting experiment on a table surface not water.ofcourse you see waterincrease!!!try the glass water and ice cubes experiment and debunk that "scientist ????" Just check who's paying her and discover she's fake
@@Worldymagus ua-cam.com/video/e82smfcypUc/v-deo.html
Same around England, have lived by sea all my long life, and no, hasn't risen. Erosion yes, but that's easily, and has been, addressed. World is a globe...risen by a millimetre? I call bs, NEVER has....funded scientists will say anything to maintain lucrative funding, simple....
Peter Read Totally agree, no rise in UK either, biggest scam all for taxing purposes by govts, disgraceful....
Full stop 🛑 You said “As the Antarctic melts” as you hit the ice cube with the hair dryer. Are you aware the Antarctic ice cap has been growing since 2013? Are you aware certain (well chosen) measurement points in NY actually sinking?
Karl Jensen You mean the tiny tick up in the long trend of decreasing volume?
The Antarctic ice cap, parts of it at least have been growing because a warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, thus more snowfall in the areas that have warmed closer to zero degrees but are not yet above freezing. In the parts of Antarctica where temperatures have risen above zero, the collapse has begun.
@@optichange807
Lol!😂
That’s why they had to drop “Global warming” and use the catch all “Climate change”.
Helped me so much on my school project, thanks
NASA just released a study indicating that accumulation might actually be greater than melt in Antarctica.
Ever wonder what part of National AERONAUTIC and SPACE Administration has anything to do with the climate on earth? Could NASA be involved in climate because it's a government agency and therefor can easily be controlled? Are you aware of all the guess work involved in climate change data? Are you aware that NASA and NOAA falsified data to get the results they want? Do you know the truth behind the "97% scientists agree" statement? Do you know that figure comes from a 2 question poll of cherry picked people and that 75 out of 77 of them agreed on the answer to one of those questions? I guarantee you if you look into this, you will discover a lot of proof exposing this hoax. Start with Tony Heller right here on UA-cam. Ever wonder why that little note on what global warming appears on all UA-cam videos? Notice how it doesn't INSIST you believe in global warming. Instead, it parades itself as truth, just quietly enough to let you convince yourself that there is a problem. The problem is those pushing the hoax and why they are doing it. As usual, follow the money.
That's b/c I just pissed in the sea
@@ChuckHaney Government is the last refuge of the sub-standard mind.
We have a very advanced method of dealing with sea level rise: U-Haul!
I’d rather give trillion of dollars and way more power to the UN. wouldn't you? Lol
They had us fooled for a minute but thankfully we figured out big climate is out of control.
They aint rising.
Yeah, I'll just sell my house to the fish
You make a valid point, except: Many of the populations most likely to be affected can barely survive as it is and they cannot afford a Uhaul or to buy a new home. These people are going to be desperate, desperate enough to do almost anything to survive. The biggest danger of global warming and rising sea levels, especially at the unprecedented rate that they are occurring, is the conflicts that are likely to result.
Several hundred million people, at a minimum, are going to have to move over a few decades at most. Consider what the political blowback to only a million of so immigrants to the EU since the instability in the middle east caused many to leave in search of a safer place to live. What do you suppose is going to happen when that number become not a million but 100 million?
Then add to this mix the fact that so much of the infrastructure of so many wealthy countries is located only a few meters above sea level. It will cost America many trillions of dollars to save NYC, Boston, New Orleans, Miami, LA, the central valley of Calif where the majority of produce in America comes from, etc.
Fact: sea level rise hasn’t gotten quicker in the last few years. It has been steadily rising since the last ice age.
Fact: Antarctica’s amount of ice has increased.
Fact: sea levels won’t rise because of the melting of the North Pole because it is already floating(like ice in water, when it melts the water level doesn’t rise).
Isn't the North pole situated on land tho?
0:13 talking about flood in Thailand last weekend my friend's neighbor died from drowning in flood recently
So sorry my friend. Very sad situation there :(
F
haha