I don't get people who get on Chuck. He is consistently funny. Very respectful, and doesn't constantly interject in an annoying manner like other comedians they have worked with. Some of those guys are nonstop, and the scientist can barely get a word in. Chuck usually interjects with well placed, well-timed humor. But the best thing about Chuck is, there are moments, where he really shows his intelligence outside of his quick whit, and either says things or sums things up very well.Just had to say that after seeing people disrespect him in other videos.
100% true. I have raised my kids in Florida and when they inherit my house I am going to instruct them to sell it and move north so they can give their kids a home. Thanks for informing others. Alot of people never believe me when I tell them these things.
We all know that Neil is brilliant. I believe Chuck was added to reach a larger audience so When the smart intelligent teacher and the funny student are conjured together you get Startak. Spreading informative information to the world...
I too didn’t appreciate Chuck at first. But I didn’t realize he was a comedian and have come to enjoy his humor. Sometimes he also adds some clarity to the technical discussions. Chuck is a pretty smart guy and pretty entertaining as well. I think Chuck is a good counterbalance to Neil.
This is why I love you guys. Individually I knew all that but I've never really put it together in my head and really thought about it. Another great explainer!
I was thinking the exact same thing. Like yeah, the coastline today wasn't the same as it was a million years ago, but there's nothing special about today that says this is how our coastlines are "supposed" to look. I never considered that the continental shelf took the shape of the coastline because they USED to be the coastline. I had always thought of them as being solely part of plate tectonics.
I live close to the glaciers in the Canadian Rockies. We're supposed to have a few hundred years of ice pack to stock our water supplies at current melt levels (see Columbia Glacier...which I have seen retreating all my life during family visits since I was 3). The retreat of the glacier is pretty dramatic. But, there are still hundreds of meters of ice up high. When flying to the coast, you can still see lots of white (and clear cuts). I don't know how much water that would equate to if all melted into the ocean. To the south in Montana, the Grinnell Glacier was pretty famous when I was a kid and now it is completely gone. The past few years have seen rainfall dwindle and we're expecting a crazy dry year. Farmers are bracing for drought. Our skies have turned red a few times with all the forest fires. Crossing my fingers for mother nature to be nice to us.
Saddly a "crude" reality we have to deal with. Here in the Caribbean I'm not that "optimistic" at all. Most of the island have little beach coast. So, we have to move to the central mountains to survive. All the cities at the coast well be gone and most likely half of the population at least. About 44 towns (about half of the population.... 1.5M persons) are at the coast line. Mother nature didn't have VIP's for nobody, so everybody should be taking steps toward our survival as in humans for the generations to come, regardless of the place on the earth you live. My two cents....
I live on higher ground, so I rely on coastal people to tell me their experiences of water rise. I see ice shrinkage. The result is typically dryness/drought. It is interesting to hear deniers say that the coasts are not flooding when homeowners are saying otherwise.
@@samsonau8205I live 8 miles from the beach and the only thing that has changed is the amount of 24 story condos they've built along the coast line. They aren't afraid to spend billions building along the Coast. We also noticed yesterday that we have 2 new Islands reappearing in the Indian River that we can see crossing the bridge. The Indian River and the Banana Rivers are both fed from the Atlantic Ocean and are considered brackish rivers because they also are fed from fresh water sources. What I have noticed is the normal twice annual flooding around Miami that is caused by the King Tide is now being used as evidence of riding seas due to Climate Change. Those annual events have been occuring long before Climate Change was cool. The Florida Keys are all still there and haven't shrunk in size. It's always the Coast of the Continental US that's going under water and never Hawaii
Chuck is the best comedians to appear on Startalk. He appropriates the amount of jokes to keep things interesting related to the topic and not make it about him. You’re the best Chuck 👍👍👍
Just to add... It's not just the melting of sea ice or glaciers that's causing the rise in sea levels. Something like 30% to 40% is caused by thermal expansion. As heat gets trapped, and the oceans warm up, the volume of water expands.
"Aircraft fly through existing clouds and inject the tiny particles, like silver iodide," What about the above? Why doesn't anybody address the elephant in the room?
The changing shoreline also impacts land “ownership”. If your land is reduced due to erosion or rising sea level, you still don’t own the land under the water.
I live 4 blocks from the ocean in Daytona Beach and have been here for 6 years now. When I moved here there was a very long sandy beach to cross before getting to the water. Now on most days there is no beach. The water goes all the way to the buildings retaining walls. All I'm gonna say is I'm happy I'm renting not owning.
The insurance companies that leave, do so for a reason. Then some place you would think safe ,like Colorado, gets kerbango'd with giant hail and everybody gets a new roof. Prolly way cheaper still, than a hurricane. Florida is going to be bizarre....there'll be islands and swamps everywhere.(well - even more than now.
I live in Wellington, New Zealand, but my house is in the suburbs of the hills 138m above. Just a few meters of sea level rise would swamp our entire central city, and storm surge would take care of the rest. Im sure it's the same elsewhere. That's MILLIONS of people displaced in a couple of generations.
6:10 I’m pretty sure the people in Mexico City would take issue with this statement that all major historical cities are on coastlines. edit: My mistake, he actually said “on major water lines.” So technically correct. Good word choice Mr. Tyson 👏👏
@@a.y.greyson9264 As I understand it was a network of many lakes, and islands in those lakes, but still at high enough elevation as to avoid sinking under rising sea levels.
Florida. Newly wed or nearly dead. I watched jetties, and beaches disappear in a matter of a decade. I've seen the ocean meet the lagoon during numerous storms in Florida. I've been an avid climate watcher and weather observer for many decades. It has been heart breaking. Move the museum now.
My buddy who used to live in W.Palm said the water down there has gotten disgusting....and diving and fishing is what he lived for. Now the fish are going goofy all over the Keys. Used to pick up garbage by fishing spots in the Keys. That was where we came out of the water from a dive and the amount of beer cans in the water was ...insane ( plus they look a lot bigger down there.) I've been all over the country and I've seen garbage in some of the most pristine places. It gets one furious. No worries; the planet will clean it all up ...in time...
The ocean level is rising at less than 4 millimeters per year. In a decade that would be 4 centimeters. Beaches and jetties aren't disappearing because the ocean level is rising. It's more likely they are being eroded due to waves.
@@BillGreenAZ The rise varies around the world, it varies due to geography,and a myriad of other factors....where you live it; you see it....but hey, when it's outa sight and outa mind - it's nothing. To coastal cities;it's something to be planned for. Just look at high tide. Is it the same everywhere ? nope. The geography can raise the water up a lot more in certain places, but yes; sand bars come and go, appear and disappear all the time. The beaches of Long Island get washed away all the time now, and they have to bring in new sand. How would millimeters do that.
I feel like when schools have science lessons instead of having the teacher talk their boring lessons, just put up a video with Neil Tyson and it will be a much more enjoyable lesson where the students actually remembers something.
I live in the house I grew up in North of Boston on the coast. My backyard never flooded when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s unless there was a massive storm. Now it juuuust peeks up the storm drain on an astronomical high tide, and floods 10-15 times per year with pretty run of the mill storms. Not a good trend and it’s really going to be a big economic problem, in addition to the ecological problem
No ecological issues at all. Sea levels have gone up and down before and ecosystems were fine. And gradual sea rise is a massive economical oportunity. And it might help create new more efficient cities over the oudated ones we have now.
@@gabkoostI suppose sea level rise alone isn’t an ecological problem. Unfortunately, rapidly rising ocean temperatures and dropping pH levels are causing problems. Sea level rises and falls naturally, but it isn’t supposed to be this fast
@@gabkoost that’s a simplistic view. Raising sea levels have destroyed climates and ecosystems because high sea levels doesn’t mean more water in the ocean saline levels will be affected disrupting currents and natural recycled energy in the ocean through water density, water temperature and more. We already seeing excessive algal growth when depriving ecosystems of water killing entire communities of marine life. Coral reefs are bleaching from increasing acidity and temperature in the oceans which provide shelter and food for a literal entire ecosystem. You can’t improve anything, if our environment is changing too fast for us to adapt. Not to mention, the loss of coastlines would render so many homeless and hungry, if not dead.
This was a very good episode. Also, whether you believe In climate change or not, the ocean water is rising. The scary thing about this event is it’s happening very quick now. There are some things going on that I thought wouldn’t happen for another 30 to 40 years but it’s happening now.
In Tacoma,Wa. ,they just spent a lot of money ,moving the parking,bbq pits ,bathrooms, and concessions 30 ft. Up the hill due to water level rise. Point Defiance Park...Owen's beach.
All the expensive sea facing hotel and luxury apartments will become obsolete by 2050 because all the roads and parking lots will practically be permanently flooded by that time.
@@adarsh4764We were taught in school that by the year 2000 the entire US would be underwater except for the mountain tops, and the Statue of Liberty would be up to her chest. 24 years past that date and it still hasn't happened, and they're still making new predictions. Only this time the deadline is the year 2100 when most living people old enough to remember will all be dead
That's not factoring in atmospheric water or more iner land water. The planet gets warmer, and the atmosphere will be able to hold more water, and the land will accumulate more water in rivers, lakes, deserts, and life.
@FunSlinger620 Not necessarily. Places like deserts would soak up much of the water. Through new plant life and water vapor. Places like desert and the polls hold little to no water in their atmosphere. Much of the water would become ground water as well. Not to mention, ice expands. Much of the ice has trapped gasses, dabree, etc, inflating the ice size.
There is also the fact that the sheer weight of ice on Antarctica actually pushes the rock down into the mantle so the continent of Antarctica will rise up in elevation which will displace even more water.
Living in Kansas it's hard for me to understand. I expect we will see more people moving in. The majority moving to my town are from the north east. Move now when land prices are average. If wait be prepared to pay through the nose.
My house is four miles from the coast and 35 feet above sea level, with a drop to 25 above sea level at the end of the back yard. There should be a long period of time when it's beachfront property, but not until the year 2400 or so.
@@jennifermarlow. It will rise about a foot by 2050. Except in flat low-lying areas, that won't be a big problem. Hawaii is not very flat. It will only lose a tiny bit of coastline. The real acceleration in sea level rise will start after that, probably about a three foot rise by 2100. If you are in your twenties, I wouldn't buy a forever home six feet above sea level.
One thing you missed about Florida is saltwater intrusion into the local aquifers which has already occurred and will get worse by orders of magnitude because it's just a limestone island,
@@imtheeastgermanguy5431the salt water intrudes because of drawing out too much fresh water for our use, similar problem in a lot of heavily populated coasts. Planting mangroves is helpful for erosion control so still useful.
The problem is not only the additional volume of water melting into the ocean, the heating of the oceans will cause the water to expand, further raising the surface level. The melting of the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets will also eliminate their reflection of sunlight and expose dark waters that will instead absorb sunlight and convert it to heat, further warming the oceans and again raising sea levels. Increased sea levels also means increased tides and storm surges, which dramatically increases erosion. Hotter ocean mean more frequent and powerful storms, again with higher storm surges. I was raised in Bermuda, which lies in the North Atlantic Ocean about 600 miles of the Coast of North Carolina. Growing up there we learned about the five glacial and interglacial periods that have successively inundated and revealed the archipelago, allowing coral colonies to form and then destroying them and eroding them to sand, then forming limestone. Currently Bermuda is comprised of 9 majors islands and more than 100 islets that together have a total landmass of about 22 square miles. However, during the peak of a glacial period the entire summit of the Bermuda Rose is exposed revealing a single island of 200 square miles (plus Argus and Challenger Banks. Over the past 150 million years since Bermuda formed this has happened five times if I recall correctly, and the islands are of course presently shrinking. Bermuda is comprised of a relatively soft limestone cap sitting on top of an extinct submarine volcano. Limestone can be broken by hand, so you can imagine the damage wreaked by a powerful hurricane or winter gale. The first Bermuda, a volcanic island, stood at 1,000 feet above sea level. Currently, the highest hill stands at just over 200 feet. The climate there has grown noticeably warmer in my life time; winter temperatures as low as 44°F (6°C) were not uncommon when I was growing up, but over the past 14 years I do not think the temperature has dropped below 56°F (13°C), and I recall meteorologists reporting that the harsh winter of 2010-2011 was the first normal winter for 20 years. For those of us raised on Oceanic Islands, we know the Ocean and we observe the weather like an unpredictable and potentially dangerous alcoholic neighbour. I am betting long term, I moved to the continent.
So the "Clovis first, land bridge" hypothesis is probably not the full story, there's evidence of settlement in the Americas that pre-dates the land bridge being de-glaciered. They also almost certainly used large canoes during migration. It's neat, look into it!
To those of you trying to use the "ice cubes in a glass of water" analogy-- you obviously weren't paying attention. Re-watch the video and LISTEN this time. 🙄
Indeed. That analogy is only logical if the ice is already floating on the water (as in a glass). But Greenland and Antarctica are land masses with ice on top. The ice has zero influence on the water as it is now. But that can (and most likely will) change big time...
The great scientific genius of Rush Limbaugh used that "ice cube" dreck in his dreadful nonsense of global warming bashing. I wish I could have confronted him in his radio studio with a big plate of water, put a big block of ice, as big as Shaquille O'Neal's show box, leaving about 10% of ice above water, set so the water level is up at the top of the plate edge, and leave it that way overnight. Now see what happens when you arrive next day. A big ol' mess to wipe up off your desk, Rush!
@tom7471 I don't know much; but, I'm smart enough to know that the land mass moves up and down and climate alarmists are not. They have no way to measure sea level accurately. At best they have a margin of error of 60 to 100 millimeters on an LEO satellite.
i have been feeling just like Chuck about this. our children deserved better. James Hasen says he wouldn't be surprised if we experience 5 meters by the end of this century. skycool technology!!
Problem with skycool technologies is that once you start, you have to fine tune it forever, continue it forever and one little bit of misunderstanding creates world famine. Not worth the risk in a world where we can't even still predict the weather.
@@thejuanderful - Not just Atlantis. Plenty of old myths and stories about the Flood, a lot from different cultures around the globe too. And later stories from ancient Akakdian myths such as story of Astra-Hasis, are just remnants of much older texts. Later on, they become part of story of Noe and his Ark (which is based on the Akkadian story and Utnapishtim). Myths and legends. Mostly... verbal. As a lot of writing, knowledge - was probably lost during that time. All was left was the "legends and myths" at the end. You also have underwater old structures all around the planet, for example close to Japan, but also plenty other places if you read about it. So, definitely something has happened during the last ice age, as the date of about 12K years ago is poping out quite often here and there in various myths, but also professional literature. And in a way, we actually know what has happened (or may have) - from the astronomy. Most likely some kind of meteor strikes, not just one, but multiple, small/large impacts on the ice polar caps too, lasting many years. At the end, quite large catastrophe, that most likely destroyed civilizations at that time, destroyed any possible coastal town/cities (whoever they were). And at some point the process was fast, especially after hitting the existing ice caps and melting of water (and more). I would suggest to start with something like the basic research: "Paleolitic Extinction and the Taurid Complex", by W.M. Napier, from Cardiff Centre for Astrobiology, Cardiff University, 2 North Road, Cardiff CF10 3DY, from Feb 2010 (Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.405,1901-1906(2010)). Quotes from the above reasearch: "Intersection with the debris of a large (50-100km) short-period comet during the Upper Paleolithic, provides a satisfactory explanation for the catastrophe of celestian origin which has been postulated to have occured around 12900 BP, and which presaged a return to ice age conditions of duration of about 1300 yr. The Taurid Complex appears to be the debris of this erswhile comet..." "The sudden onset of the Younger Dryas cooling 12900 yr ago was marked by intense wildfires over North America, major distruption of human culture, and the rapid extinction of 35 genera of Noth American mammals (Faith & Surovell 2009). A thin lcarbon-rich black layer of this age has been identified at many sites across North America (Haynes 2008), coincident in age with the Younger Dryas Boundary. Recently, several geochemical markers at this layer have been presented which seem to indicate that a major extraterrestial event was involved in these events (Firestone et al.2007; Firestone 2009)." And then it list the markers such as: nondiamonds, soot, microspherules and magnetic grains (giving description of the research and further academic references for each of those). But to be honest, plenty of other researches too, even from sources not related to astronomy. But the above would be a good starting point. Edit: Added more quotes from the research, from Cardiff University. Plus some grammar/spelling check.
Humans are evolving in different direction. In fact at micro level we resist to evolve, think this way, what we do if it is very hot day, we switch on AC, we put warming cloths on colder days. We take medicine and drugs to overcome diseases and infections without giving a chance to body to fight itself by immune system. Although we swim we just use boats and flights to travel over sea. With all these where is the challenge to evolve with water?
Aquatic life is evolving quite well on a wet planet. But make no mistake that like 99% of the species to ever exist we'll all go extinct at some point. And new ones will rise and evolve in their stead
Sad part this is mostly due to rich corporations trying to buy lobbyist in either preventing from any real action or denying it. But once things goes sideways and the coastline start to change, they (or their families inheriting their wealth) will be the ones that will be most protected from this.
In the animation at the beginning, Iceland is shown as having a longer coastline during the iceage. But Iceland was completely under the ice, did it really have a larger coastline during that period?
I wouldn't say that. He'd be of better use as a member of a board turns to for scientific matters. A president who specializes in political relations and possibly philosophy would be preferable.
@Chuck: take comfort in the fact that most of Central and Southern NJ will become a huge lake while Northern NJ becomes a peninsula where most of us live. 😎
I predict the sun will come up tomorrow. Therefore, I can also predict that when we find Planet Claire, all the trees will be red and no one will have a head.
@@bill_tube Face it. Predicting when and where an eclipse will be many years out is impressive AF. Infinitely harder than saying "There will be eclipses".
The top of the southernmost point marker in Key West is 18 feet above sea level. How much taller should it be to mark this ancient point for a hypothetical ice-less future?
I’m from New Jersey And I agree gentleman I’ve been telling people for years I’m going to North Dakota the geographical center of North America, because all of this will come to be…
Somebody tell the politicians and billionaires that are buying up coastal properties...it's almost like they aren't concerned with the sea level rising. They certainly don't mind burning up more fuel in one trip than anybody else, that would take a decade of driving and fueling up their car.
Rising sea levels are causing an influx of seawater into areas that were once only fresh water. This problem will get worse resulting in the loss of coastal freshwater aquifers.
There was recent news about a home in Nantucket, purchased for $2.3M, market price should have been $3.2M, but it sold for $600k because 70ft of its beach had been washed away by the oceans in under 6 weeks.
I live in New Mexico where the Western Inland Seaway was located during the Late Cretaceous period. I look forward to having seafront property for awhile until all the ice melts and a floating residence is required. ⛵
Through a different lens, in the same time, but a different location… this video would be viewed as inappropriate. Much love to you both. Keep it going.
Great episode. A Floridian average of 6 feet above sea level seems like utter luxury though, living in the west of the 'temporary Netherlands', at about 6 feet below sea level. . We've been able to say "Ocean storms? High tide? Meh." for some decades now but that won't last.
It does my heart good to know that Florida will be some of the first fundamentalist strongholds to be lost to the uncaring potency of the very God they worship, and wield against so many of us. Makes you think... unless you are a Floridian, of course.
My parents live in Connecticut, just a few miles from the ocean but at 710 feet above sea level. They’re going to have a spectacular view when the glaciers melt.
During my 56 years of construction, I have tied elevation loops into Township Monuments. As sea level rises, all those of those Monuments will have to be corrected. Buildings will have to be salvaged, along with bridge structures. Youngsters may want to train in heavy rigging and crane operation. The salvage business will be a big thing. 😢
True, geological time is not usually in our scale but now (I mean since the 70’s) we’re speaking in decades and that mean a human life. The first self propelled flight is only 120 years old !
As usual, I enjoyed Neils conversation, which gives an intriguing explaination of the continental shelves. My questions are multiple though, starting with how much of those continental shelves were land mass? This question is based on the premise that way back when, apparently all of the continents were one massive land mass and we had the Continental Drift, which I believe is ore than a theory. Also, reading various papers about how this is still happening to some extent due to the movement of the techtonic plates. My other major question is Neil talks about change on a timescale of decades, so exactly how has this been proven other than a theory? Not arguing against climate change as we know we have had a changing climate for 4.5 Billion years or so and it will continue to change long after mankind is not longer on this planet. However, I see records showing the sea level in the Scandinavian fjords is relatively unchanged for many hundreds of years - back to the age of the Viking. We see some of the very first photography showing Ellis Island with pretty much the same coastline as today. We have Plymouth Rock and other locations with sea levels not too dissimilar as well, so on the back of that how are these predictions made? From historical records, Antarctica had less ice in the times of Shackelton etc and satellite observations show since around 1979 show an expanding ice shelf. We see unusual patterns with the Arctic Ice with a reduction, but from various records this appears to be the product of changing ovean current flows. I see a bit of a balance between the two with no massive volume change overall indicated.
"Our ancestors walked over. They didn't take a boat." Actually, it's now thought that they also took boats which helped them get to the coasts of North and South America.
Had a conversation with my mother about Climate Change because I said something about supporting RFK jr & she responded with a disapproval of his stance on Climate Change. She thinks that its a waste of time and resources to invest into managing a seeming inevitability. Her argument is "If the world is "flipped upside down" that there is nothing we can do about that. My argument was that we can adapt as much as humanly possible, as we always have. Nonetheless, she expressed at the very least adamance if not intransigence about the subject. I hope I can get through to her one day.
Way before we reach that maximum, we’ll deal with dangerous water rising because of intensified storms and overflowing rivers because of increased precipitation. So for anyone thinking, we’ll be fine for a few more decades at least, we’re not. Cheers from the Netherlands.
Whatever software was used to generate the images of the Bering Land Bridge is pretty sweet! The topography looks a bit exaggerated but it's a really great render.
@@Apollorion Per the 2014 Scientific American article *_How Climate Change Spurred a 10,000-Year Ice Age Journey,_* "While most of the region endured dry, freezing weather, pockets of 'refugia,' or vegetated areas not affected by climate change, remained scattered along the Bering land bridge throughout the [Last Glacial Maximum] period. These unaffected areas provided the Native American founder population with moist, mild temperatures as well as adequate amounts of shrubs, trees and animals."
My husband’s family has been in south Florida for a few generations 4-5 at least. Our daughter will be 79 in 2100… it’s insane to think that her grandkids may not get to see her family home 😭
This happens no matter people do but we speed up the clock.There is no coincidence that the last 10,000 have been the best for human civilization. Less land should mean less people so the planet will heal.
I have a series question. People always say that because the polar ice melts it cause flooding via global warming. It will then flood coast lines, but if ice has less buoyancy than the water. How much ice needs to flood for it to be noticeable. As we have seen before if ice is sitting on top of water well above in the top of a cup and it melts the water doesn’t overflow. And the outer core earth is supposed to be so smooth and so flat compared to something like a cue ball. Why would the ice caps melting cause that much land lost. Or would it cause that much land lost.
It's funny because forecasters have deemed Orlando a climate haven and it another major city not built on a major waterway. It will be an island of course but it's supposed to be able to weather the sea level rise.
As climate change accelerates, the dynamics of coastal erosion, sea level rise, and extreme weather events are expected to significantly alter our coastlines. These changes pose challenges to ecosystems, infrastructure, and human settlements. How can current models and mitigation strategies be improved to better predict and manage the impacts of these transformations on our coastlines, and what role can technology play in adapting to these evolving conditions?
If you saw the first version of this upload, no you didn’t...
Haha lol 😂
lol I was about to ask the problem with the previous version? It was unavailable when I finally decided to press play.
it showed up on my recommendations, clicked it, then it went away before had chance to play, this one is a second shorter. did you omit a bad word?
did Chuck say something bad? lol
Haha when the water level reached the left elbow the world ended and the video disappeared..
I don't get people who get on Chuck. He is consistently funny. Very respectful, and doesn't constantly interject in an annoying manner like other comedians they have worked with. Some of those guys are nonstop, and the scientist can barely get a word in. Chuck usually interjects with well placed, well-timed humor. But the best thing about Chuck is, there are moments, where he really shows his intelligence outside of his quick whit, and either says things or sums things up very well.Just had to say that after seeing people disrespect him in other videos.
Chuck is the man
@@PssszztYo
Chuck is the man, man.
Chuck is awesome ❤
Agreed. Dude is dope and actually adds value to the show.
love chuck ❤
My late uncle worked for NOAA, he went out on Navy ships (as a civilian) and mapped the ocean floors.
That's pretty awesome, is that why we have ocean floor maps on everything now?
This is my job now!! It's an amazing thing to see and do. You'd be surprised at what is in our oceans.
@@TheHierophantCanonwhat do you guys see
Sounds like a tall tale
I love how Neil makes these topics fun and digestible... kudos Dr. Tyson and Lord Nice
Yeah, the flooding of the Earth's coastlines is hilarious!
@@michaelbyrnee9584it’s inevitable so laugh or go crazy your pick
Nothing like fun and digestible human habitat destruction I always say. 😂
These dudes are racist clowns! Both cry babies probably own beach front properties 🤣
It makes it easier to digest the propaganda.
100% true. I have raised my kids in Florida and when they inherit my house I am going to instruct them to sell it and move north so they can give their kids a home. Thanks for informing others. Alot of people never believe me when I tell them these things.
Hats off to Chuck. Quick-witted and very funny. Great chemistry between the pair of you.
From London 🇬🇧
I’m not wearing a hat 😔
@@MzeeMoja1 mzee hana kofia?
Put your hat back on, nobody wants to see that.
Oh baloney. Climate change is intended to induce panic.
He made me laugh a lot on this one.
We all know that Neil is brilliant. I believe Chuck was added to reach a larger audience so
When the smart intelligent teacher and the funny student are conjured together you get Startak. Spreading informative information to the world...
I never knew I needed Chuck to turn what I already enjoyed from Neil into something that makes me laugh while learning. He is a national treasure.
I too didn’t appreciate Chuck at first. But I didn’t realize he was a comedian and have come to enjoy his humor. Sometimes he also adds some clarity to the technical discussions. Chuck is a pretty smart guy and pretty entertaining as well. I think Chuck is a good counterbalance to Neil.
i've been watching this channel for years and impressed with how much chuck has learned
Realize they both actors...
@@labbeajSure. Everything's a performance. Are you trying to discredit an astrophysicist because he has a career in outreach?
@@D.A.OhK. Discredit, no, however actors do act.
@@labbeajyou clowns stay coming onto Neil’s vids with the fuckery. Go be a hater elsewhere
This is why I love you guys. Individually I knew all that but I've never really put it together in my head and really thought about it. Another great explainer!
I was thinking the exact same thing. Like yeah, the coastline today wasn't the same as it was a million years ago, but there's nothing special about today that says this is how our coastlines are "supposed" to look. I never considered that the continental shelf took the shape of the coastline because they USED to be the coastline. I had always thought of them as being solely part of plate tectonics.
I live close to the glaciers in the Canadian Rockies. We're supposed to have a few hundred years of ice pack to stock our water supplies at current melt levels (see Columbia Glacier...which I have seen retreating all my life during family visits since I was 3). The retreat of the glacier is pretty dramatic. But, there are still hundreds of meters of ice up high. When flying to the coast, you can still see lots of white (and clear cuts). I don't know how much water that would equate to if all melted into the ocean. To the south in Montana, the Grinnell Glacier was pretty famous when I was a kid and now it is completely gone.
The past few years have seen rainfall dwindle and we're expecting a crazy dry year. Farmers are bracing for drought. Our skies have turned red a few times with all the forest fires. Crossing my fingers for mother nature to be nice to us.
"Crossing my fingers for mother nature to be nice to us"
Sadly, she doesn't owe us any favors. But I hope she is nonetheless.
Man that's sad and scary, praying for you
Saddly a "crude" reality we have to deal with. Here in the Caribbean I'm not that "optimistic" at all. Most of the island have little beach coast. So, we have to move to the central mountains to survive. All the cities at the coast well be gone and most likely half of the population at least. About 44 towns (about half of the population.... 1.5M persons) are at the coast line. Mother nature didn't have VIP's for nobody, so everybody should be taking steps toward our survival as in humans for the generations to come, regardless of the place on the earth you live. My two cents....
I live on higher ground, so I rely on coastal people to tell me their experiences of water rise. I see ice shrinkage. The result is typically dryness/drought.
It is interesting to hear deniers say that the coasts are not flooding when homeowners are saying otherwise.
@@samsonau8205I live 8 miles from the beach and the only thing that has changed is the amount of 24 story condos they've built along the coast line. They aren't afraid to spend billions building along the Coast.
We also noticed yesterday that we have 2 new Islands reappearing in the Indian River that we can see crossing the bridge. The Indian River and the Banana Rivers are both fed from the Atlantic Ocean and are considered brackish rivers because they also are fed from fresh water sources.
What I have noticed is the normal twice annual flooding around Miami that is caused by the King Tide is now being used as evidence of riding seas due to Climate Change. Those annual events have been occuring long before Climate Change was cool. The Florida Keys are all still there and haven't shrunk in size. It's always the Coast of the Continental US that's going under water and never Hawaii
Chuck is the best comedians to appear on Startalk. He appropriates the amount of jokes to keep things interesting related to the topic and not make it about him. You’re the best Chuck 👍👍👍
and an excellent and clever example of that was him equating Florida's elevation to his own height plus an inch. loved it!
“And now we must wait until White man come… to discover us!” 😂
Just to add... It's not just the melting of sea ice or glaciers that's causing the rise in sea levels.
Something like 30% to 40% is caused by thermal expansion. As heat gets trapped, and the oceans warm up, the volume of water expands.
Nobody asked you Otis 🤣🤣🤣 just/k
"Aircraft fly through existing clouds and inject the tiny particles, like silver iodide,"
What about the above?
Why doesn't anybody address the elephant in the room?
The changing shoreline also impacts land “ownership”. If your land is reduced due to erosion or rising sea level, you still don’t own the land under the water.
Your comment addressed my buyer beware warning for people who intend to buy Hurricane Helene & Milton property; Florida will be under water. Aedin
I live 4 blocks from the ocean in Daytona Beach and have been here for 6 years now. When I moved here there was a very long sandy beach to cross before getting to the water. Now on most days there is no beach. The water goes all the way to the buildings retaining walls. All I'm gonna say is I'm happy I'm renting not owning.
Beaches have to be maintained, even rebuilt after serious enough weather or they'll wash away.
Ever heard of erosion
The insurance companies that leave, do so for a reason. Then some place you would think safe ,like Colorado, gets kerbango'd with giant hail and everybody gets a new roof. Prolly way cheaper still, than a hurricane. Florida is going to be bizarre....there'll be islands and swamps everywhere.(well - even more than now.
@@bigcity2085 yup just enjoying it while it's still here but ive made peace that it'll be very different in our lifetime.
maybe it eroded away in the ocean level didn't really rise did you ever think of that
StarTalk Radio. Came for Neil, stayed for Chuck.
I live in Wellington, New Zealand, but my house is in the suburbs of the hills 138m above. Just a few meters of sea level rise would swamp our entire central city, and storm surge would take care of the rest. Im sure it's the same elsewhere. That's MILLIONS of people displaced in a couple of generations.
....and they're already getting displaced by famine, low water tables and war. Pick a safe spot.
In 1 generation. A couple of decades!!!
They've been saying this for 30 years and it still hasn't happened.
@@loolfactorie hasn’t happened to you. There are already pacific atolls now inundated by salt water.
Great. Thirty some odd years ago I moved from north Jersey to Florida ....... Always nice to see Neil and Chuck, they're a great team.
Chuck Plus an Inch is a standard unit of measurement, thank you.
Shall we call it one ChuckBit
Americans using anything but meters😂
Fathom that!
Can someone please convert that to smoots?
I'm Chuck minus 3 inches tall
6:10 I’m pretty sure the people in Mexico City would take issue with this statement that all major historical cities are on coastlines.
edit: My mistake, he actually said “on major water lines.” So technically correct. Good word choice Mr. Tyson 👏👏
There are many others as well.
Moscow enters the conversation.
But wasn’t Mexico City once located in the center of a massive lake before it was drained by the Spanish.
@@a.y.greyson9264 As I understand it was a network of many lakes, and islands in those lakes, but still at high enough elevation as to avoid sinking under rising sea levels.
That list that Mexico City is on is a 'very' short one.
Madrid has entered the chat.
Florida. Newly wed or nearly dead. I watched jetties, and beaches disappear in a matter of a decade. I've seen the ocean meet the lagoon during numerous storms in Florida. I've been an avid climate watcher and weather observer for many decades. It has been heart breaking. Move the museum now.
My buddy who used to live in W.Palm said the water down there has gotten disgusting....and diving and fishing is what he lived for. Now the fish are going goofy all over the Keys. Used to pick up garbage by fishing spots in the Keys. That was where we came out of the water from a dive and the amount of beer cans in the water was ...insane ( plus they look a lot bigger down there.) I've been all over the country and I've seen garbage in some of the most pristine places. It gets one furious. No worries; the planet will clean it all up ...in time...
The ocean level is rising at less than 4 millimeters per year. In a decade that would be 4 centimeters. Beaches and jetties aren't disappearing because the ocean level is rising. It's more likely they are being eroded due to waves.
@@BillGreenAZ The rise varies around the world, it varies due to geography,and a myriad of other factors....where you live it; you see it....but hey, when it's outa sight and outa mind - it's nothing. To coastal cities;it's something to be planned for. Just look at high tide. Is it the same everywhere ? nope. The geography can raise the water up a lot more in certain places, but yes; sand bars come and go, appear and disappear all the time. The beaches of Long Island get washed away all the time now, and they have to bring in new sand. How would millimeters do that.
@bigcity2085 you must be college educated
I feel like when schools have science lessons instead of having the teacher talk their boring lessons, just put up a video with Neil Tyson and it will be a much more enjoyable lesson where the students actually remembers something.
I really enjoy CEU. Continuing Education Units.
With humor.
That's y'all.❤
I live in the house I grew up in North of Boston on the coast. My backyard never flooded when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s unless there was a massive storm. Now it juuuust peeks up the storm drain on an astronomical high tide, and floods 10-15 times per year with pretty run of the mill storms. Not a good trend and it’s really going to be a big economic problem, in addition to the ecological problem
No ecological issues at all. Sea levels have gone up and down before and ecosystems were fine. And gradual sea rise is a massive economical oportunity. And it might help create new more efficient cities over the oudated ones we have now.
@@gabkoostI suppose sea level rise alone isn’t an ecological problem. Unfortunately, rapidly rising ocean temperatures and dropping pH levels are causing problems. Sea level rises and falls naturally, but it isn’t supposed to be this fast
The sea level is rising too fast right now to even say some of these cities. Some of these cities may have to be abandoned in the near future
@@gabkoost Yeah, corporations will make a lot of money on coffins and funerals. Also - soylent green, once the climate change wrecks agriculture.
@@gabkoost that’s a simplistic view. Raising sea levels have destroyed climates and ecosystems because high sea levels doesn’t mean more water in the ocean saline levels will be affected disrupting currents and natural recycled energy in the ocean through water density, water temperature and more. We already seeing excessive algal growth when depriving ecosystems of water killing entire communities of marine life. Coral reefs are bleaching from increasing acidity and temperature in the oceans which provide shelter and food for a literal entire ecosystem. You can’t improve anything, if our environment is changing too fast for us to adapt. Not to mention, the loss of coastlines would render so many homeless and hungry, if not dead.
This was so well done and explained the history of climate change for the average viewer kudos to both you🎉🎉🎉
This was a very good episode. Also, whether you believe In climate change or not, the ocean water is rising. The scary thing about this event is it’s happening very quick now. There are some things going on that I thought wouldn’t happen for another 30 to 40 years but it’s happening now.
very quickly you better run
I wish Neil was my teacher.
He is ❤
In Tacoma,Wa. ,they just spent a lot of money ,moving the parking,bbq pits ,bathrooms, and concessions 30 ft. Up the hill due to water level rise. Point Defiance Park...Owen's beach.
Penny's compared to what your leaders want to do
@@Mike-x9h5fwhat do they want to do?
All the expensive sea facing hotel and luxury apartments will become obsolete by 2050 because all the roads and parking lots will practically be permanently flooded by that time.
@@adarsh4764
No they wont
@@adarsh4764We were taught in school that by the year 2000 the entire US would be underwater except for the mountain tops, and the Statue of Liberty would be up to her chest.
24 years past that date and it still hasn't happened, and they're still making new predictions. Only this time the deadline is the year 2100 when most living people old enough to remember will all be dead
Always love to see Dr. Tyson being interviewed. He's always informative and entertaining! Makes global warming understandable in a fun way.😂
Note that it's not just melting of land ice. It's also expansion of ocean water when it gets hotter.
That's not factoring in atmospheric water or more iner land water. The planet gets warmer, and the atmosphere will be able to hold more water, and the land will accumulate more water in rivers, lakes, deserts, and life.
@@Delt4_Cr4wfish
As sea level rises, those inner lakes and rivers holding more water will also be covering over more land.
@FunSlinger620 Not necessarily. Places like deserts would soak up much of the water. Through new plant life and water vapor. Places like desert and the polls hold little to no water in their atmosphere. Much of the water would become ground water as well. Not to mention, ice expands. Much of the ice has trapped gasses, dabree, etc, inflating the ice size.
There is also the fact that the sheer weight of ice on Antarctica actually pushes the rock down into the mantle so the continent of Antarctica will rise up in elevation which will displace even more water.
Water only expands when it freezes.sorry
Love this duo. Learn so much from StarTalk, it really gives me the thirst for the unknown
Living in Kansas it's hard for me to understand. I expect we will see more people moving in. The majority moving to my town are from the north east. Move now when land prices are average. If wait be prepared to pay through the nose.
Just moved to Cali after living Manhattan Kansas lol
My house is four miles from the coast and 35 feet above sea level, with a drop to 25 above sea level at the end of the back yard. There should be a long period of time when it's beachfront property, but not until the year 2400 or so.
@@jennifermarlow. It will rise about a foot by 2050. Except in flat low-lying areas, that won't be a big problem. Hawaii is not very flat. It will only lose a tiny bit of coastline. The real acceleration in sea level rise will start after that, probably about a three foot rise by 2100. If you are in your twenties, I wouldn't buy a forever home six feet above sea level.
I want to do a podcast with Chuck. He’s a national treasure!
One thing you missed about Florida is saltwater intrusion into the local aquifers which has already occurred and will get worse by orders of magnitude because it's just a limestone island,
Can you just plant mangroves they protect the coast and even can turn seawater into fresh water water
@@imtheeastgermanguy5431the salt water intrudes because of drawing out too much fresh water for our use, similar problem in a lot of heavily populated coasts. Planting mangroves is helpful for erosion control so still useful.
I love Chuck. I’m always impressed because he keeps up with NDT without the pictures and diagrams. I’m dependent upon those. 😂😂
The problem is not only the additional volume of water melting into the ocean, the heating of the oceans will cause the water to expand, further raising the surface level. The melting of the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets will also eliminate their reflection of sunlight and expose dark waters that will instead absorb sunlight and convert it to heat, further warming the oceans and again raising sea levels. Increased sea levels also means increased tides and storm surges, which dramatically increases erosion. Hotter ocean mean more frequent and powerful storms, again with higher storm surges.
I was raised in Bermuda, which lies in the North Atlantic Ocean about 600 miles of the Coast of North Carolina. Growing up there we learned about the five glacial and interglacial periods that have successively inundated and revealed the archipelago, allowing coral colonies to form and then destroying them and eroding them to sand, then forming limestone. Currently Bermuda is comprised of 9 majors islands and more than 100 islets that together have a total landmass of about 22 square miles. However, during the peak of a glacial period the entire summit of the Bermuda Rose is exposed revealing a single island of 200 square miles (plus Argus and Challenger Banks. Over the past 150 million years since Bermuda formed this has happened five times if I recall correctly, and the islands are of course presently shrinking. Bermuda is comprised of a relatively soft limestone cap sitting on top of an extinct submarine volcano. Limestone can be broken by hand, so you can imagine the damage wreaked by a powerful hurricane or winter gale. The first Bermuda, a volcanic island, stood at 1,000 feet above sea level. Currently, the highest hill stands at just over 200 feet. The climate there has grown noticeably warmer in my life time; winter temperatures as low as 44°F (6°C) were not uncommon when I was growing up, but over the past 14 years I do not think the temperature has dropped below 56°F (13°C), and I recall meteorologists reporting that the harsh winter of 2010-2011 was the first normal winter for 20 years. For those of us raised on Oceanic Islands, we know the Ocean and we observe the weather like an unpredictable and potentially dangerous alcoholic neighbour. I am betting long term, I moved to the continent.
My mom actually lets me watch you guys because you unlike my teachers can keep my attention. I wish my teachers were more like you guys.
So the "Clovis first, land bridge" hypothesis is probably not the full story, there's evidence of settlement in the Americas that pre-dates the land bridge being de-glaciered.
They also almost certainly used large canoes during migration.
It's neat, look into it!
Neil says: with climate change you lose Florida...
Chuck responds: well, that's one good thing about climate change.
Well said Chuck, well said!
To those of you trying to use the "ice cubes in a glass of water" analogy-- you obviously weren't paying attention. Re-watch the video and LISTEN this time.
🙄
Indeed. That analogy is only logical if the ice is already floating on the water (as in a glass). But Greenland and Antarctica are land masses with ice on top. The ice has zero influence on the water as it is now. But that can (and most likely will) change big time...
Hmm, They have no idea what they are talking about.
The great scientific genius of Rush Limbaugh used that "ice cube" dreck in his dreadful nonsense of global warming bashing. I wish I could have confronted him in his radio studio with a big plate of water, put a big block of ice, as big as Shaquille O'Neal's show box, leaving about 10% of ice above water, set so the water level is up at the top of the plate edge, and leave it that way overnight. Now see what happens when you arrive next day. A big ol' mess to wipe up off your desk, Rush!
@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh No, that would be you who knows nothing.
@tom7471 I don't know much; but, I'm smart enough to know that the land mass moves up and down and climate alarmists are not. They have no way to measure sea level accurately. At best they have a margin of error of 60 to 100 millimeters on an LEO satellite.
i have been feeling just like Chuck about this. our children deserved better. James Hasen says he wouldn't be surprised if we experience 5 meters by the end of this century. skycool technology!!
Problem with skycool technologies is that once you start, you have to fine tune it forever, continue it forever and one little bit of misunderstanding creates world famine. Not worth the risk in a world where we can't even still predict the weather.
So... Atlantis may have been built in an early (lost) coast line
If it were, it would already be found. It would stand out on satellite images.
Not when it was written about
It has been theorized that the legend of Atlantis came from stories of the end of the ice age.
@@thejuanderful - Not just Atlantis. Plenty of old myths and stories about the Flood, a lot from different cultures around the globe too. And later stories from ancient Akakdian myths such as story of Astra-Hasis, are just remnants of much older texts. Later on, they become part of story of Noe and his Ark (which is based on the Akkadian story and Utnapishtim). Myths and legends. Mostly... verbal. As a lot of writing, knowledge - was probably lost during that time. All was left was the "legends and myths" at the end.
You also have underwater old structures all around the planet, for example close to Japan, but also plenty other places if you read about it.
So, definitely something has happened during the last ice age, as the date of about 12K years ago is poping out quite often here and there in various myths, but also professional literature. And in a way, we actually know what has happened (or may have) - from the astronomy.
Most likely some kind of meteor strikes, not just one, but multiple, small/large impacts on the ice polar caps too, lasting many years. At the end, quite large catastrophe, that most likely destroyed civilizations at that time, destroyed any possible coastal town/cities (whoever they were). And at some point the process was fast, especially after hitting the existing ice caps and melting of water (and more).
I would suggest to start with something like the basic research:
"Paleolitic Extinction and the Taurid Complex", by W.M. Napier, from Cardiff Centre for Astrobiology, Cardiff University, 2 North Road, Cardiff CF10 3DY, from Feb 2010 (Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.405,1901-1906(2010)).
Quotes from the above reasearch:
"Intersection with the debris of a large (50-100km) short-period comet during the Upper Paleolithic, provides a satisfactory explanation for the catastrophe of celestian origin which has been postulated to have occured around 12900 BP, and which presaged a return to ice age conditions of duration of about 1300 yr. The Taurid Complex appears to be the debris of this erswhile comet..."
"The sudden onset of the Younger Dryas cooling 12900 yr ago was marked by intense wildfires over North America, major distruption of human culture, and the rapid extinction of 35 genera of Noth American mammals (Faith & Surovell 2009). A thin lcarbon-rich black layer of this age has been identified at many sites across North America (Haynes 2008), coincident in age with the Younger Dryas Boundary. Recently, several geochemical markers at this layer have been presented which seem to indicate that a major extraterrestial event was involved in these events (Firestone et al.2007; Firestone 2009)."
And then it list the markers such as: nondiamonds, soot, microspherules and magnetic grains (giving description of the research and further academic references for each of those).
But to be honest, plenty of other researches too, even from sources not related to astronomy. But the above would be a good starting point.
Edit: Added more quotes from the research, from Cardiff University. Plus some grammar/spelling check.
The Christopher Columbus reference was funny 🤣
I Love StarTalk ❤
I am grateful for Your existence.
Educational Entertainment
to the MAX ❕️
It’s too bad more people (especially politicians) didn’t understand this, and take it to heart
This gentleman is a genius!! Doctor Tyson is also really smart...
DECEMBER 2024 FLORIDA.
NAILED IT.
NEIL 🤘 🤘 🤘 🤘 🤘 🤘 🤘
We exist on a wet planet, yet we refuse to evolve with it, why ?
There are too many people on this planet, do you have any idea how long it would take to open the minds of 8 billion people.
Waterworld 😂
Humans are evolving in different direction. In fact at micro level we resist to evolve, think this way, what we do if it is very hot day, we switch on AC, we put warming cloths on colder days.
We take medicine and drugs to overcome diseases and infections without giving a chance to body to fight itself by immune system.
Although we swim we just use boats and flights to travel over sea. With all these where is the challenge to evolve with water?
because we're busy trying to "evolve" Artificial Intelligence instead.
Aquatic life is evolving quite well on a wet planet. But make no mistake that like 99% of the species to ever exist we'll all go extinct at some point. And new ones will rise and evolve in their stead
Sad part this is mostly due to rich corporations trying to buy lobbyist in either preventing from any real action or denying it. But once things goes sideways and the coastline start to change, they (or their families inheriting their wealth) will be the ones that will be most protected from this.
Neil is a good combination of scientist and comedian😅😅
Comedientist
And bullshitter.
In the animation at the beginning, Iceland is shown as having a longer coastline during the iceage. But Iceland was completely under the ice, did it really have a larger coastline during that period?
Neil degasse Tyson for president in 2028
Why? Who would want that job? I wouldn't wish that on Neil.
MASA make America scientifically accurate
I wouldn't say that. He'd be of better use as a member of a board turns to for scientific matters. A president who specializes in political relations and possibly philosophy would be preferable.
Chuck for 2024
I'm no an American but a agree as he will defo make America great again
Chuck has an honorary degree at this point
Love the show!
6:35 wish Neil had gotten into how and why Antarctica’s Sea Ice is growing…while the Arctic melts! But you can’t get everything you want
@Chuck: take comfort in the fact that most of Central and Southern NJ will become a huge lake while Northern NJ becomes a peninsula where most of us live. 😎
No one says an eclipse won't happen when one is predicted. It's the one time everyone believes scientists.
One of those things happens every couple years
I predict the sun will come up tomorrow. Therefore, I can also predict that when we find Planet Claire, all the trees will be red and no one will have a head.
@@bill_tube Face it. Predicting when and where an eclipse will be many years out is impressive AF. Infinitely harder than saying "There will be eclipses".
@@stellarwind1946 Where, and what day and time?
I don’t think eclipses are predicted. It’s not like a 45% chance for one showing up.
The top of the southernmost point marker in Key West is 18 feet above sea level. How much taller should it be to mark this ancient point for a hypothetical ice-less future?
I’m from New Jersey
And I agree gentleman
I’ve been telling people for years I’m going to North Dakota the geographical center of North America, because all of this will come to be…
Somebody tell the politicians and billionaires that are buying up coastal properties...it's almost like they aren't concerned with the sea level rising. They certainly don't mind burning up more fuel in one trip than anybody else, that would take a decade of driving and fueling up their car.
We need to start a revolution
none of this is gonna happen in our lifetime. That’s why they keep buying up property, because it doesn’t matter at this point..
and they will be the ones, due to their wealth, be able to come out of this perfectly fine.
Or, maybe don't tell them? 😅
Thanks for bringing a different spin on all things, and for all the fun!
Very cool choice of topic guys! Gimme some mo Geography stuff! ❤👍🏼
“Your elevation is chuck plus an inch… you’re in trouble man”😹😹😹 that seems like a cool one liner from a movie
Rising sea levels are causing an influx of seawater into areas that were once only fresh water. This problem will get worse resulting in the loss of coastal freshwater aquifers.
I Absolutely Love Star Talk. Neil Is The Smartest Man Alive. 😊
There was recent news about a home in Nantucket, purchased for $2.3M, market price should have been $3.2M, but it sold for $600k because 70ft of its beach had been washed away by the oceans in under 6 weeks.
I can imagine the sellers: "ocean, what ocean, I don't see any ocean".
I live in New Mexico where the Western Inland Seaway was located during the Late Cretaceous period. I look forward to having seafront property for awhile until all the ice melts and a floating residence is required. ⛵
Through a different lens, in the same time, but a different location… this video would be viewed as inappropriate.
Much love to you both. Keep it going.
lmao omg the start was amazing!
Question - by loosing Florida the golf becomes fully part of the Atlantic. What happens to the earth weather and ocean currents?
And so on.....?😮
I like this question!
Great episode. A Floridian average of 6 feet above sea level seems like utter luxury though, living in the west of the 'temporary Netherlands', at about 6 feet below sea level. .
We've been able to say "Ocean storms? High tide? Meh." for some decades now but that won't last.
Take 2!
🎬
Chuck is the best friend we are all looking for😂🤣😂
It does my heart good to know that Florida will be some of the first fundamentalist strongholds to be lost to the uncaring potency of the very God they worship, and wield against so many of us.
Makes you think... unless you are a Floridian, of course.
what a terrific narration!
Hello guys !
Watching it for the second time coz you re uploaded
Thanks for your support!
What was different the first time?
Nothing but an export error!
Conspiracy starts in 3..2..1.@@StarTalk
My parents live in Connecticut, just a few miles from the ocean but at 710 feet above sea level. They’re going to have a spectacular view when the glaciers melt.
During my 56 years of construction, I have tied elevation loops into Township Monuments. As sea level rises, all those of those Monuments will have to be corrected. Buildings will have to be salvaged, along with bridge structures. Youngsters may want to train in heavy rigging and crane operation. The salvage business will be a big thing. 😢
People are impatient, if it's not happening inside hours they won't believe it's really a thing.
True, geological time is not usually in our scale but now (I mean since the 70’s) we’re speaking in decades and that mean a human life. The first self propelled flight is only 120 years old !
As usual, I enjoyed Neils conversation, which gives an intriguing explaination of the continental shelves. My questions are multiple though, starting with how much of those continental shelves were land mass? This question is based on the premise that way back when, apparently all of the continents were one massive land mass and we had the Continental Drift, which I believe is ore than a theory. Also, reading various papers about how this is still happening to some extent due to the movement of the techtonic plates.
My other major question is Neil talks about change on a timescale of decades, so exactly how has this been proven other than a theory? Not arguing against climate change as we know we have had a changing climate for 4.5 Billion years or so and it will continue to change long after mankind is not longer on this planet. However, I see records showing the sea level in the Scandinavian fjords is relatively unchanged for many hundreds of years - back to the age of the Viking. We see some of the very first photography showing Ellis Island with pretty much the same coastline as today. We have Plymouth Rock and other locations with sea levels not too dissimilar as well, so on the back of that how are these predictions made? From historical records, Antarctica had less ice in the times of Shackelton etc and satellite observations show since around 1979 show an expanding ice shelf. We see unusual patterns with the Arctic Ice with a reduction, but from various records this appears to be the product of changing ovean current flows. I see a bit of a balance between the two with no massive volume change overall indicated.
My hairlines are receding just like the coastlines in a totally different way. 😢
😂 your humorous
Over 50% of men in the world experience receding hair in their 30s that's called being alive ❤
@9:22 Hey NDT would you STOP rotating the Earth the wrong way! Thanks. :D
I hope I live long enough to see Florida underwater!
No you don’t , that’ll mean it’s really bad for the rest of us.
"Our ancestors walked over. They didn't take a boat." Actually, it's now thought that they also took boats which helped them get to the coasts of North and South America.
9:37 I want to watch "Waterworld" , movie again. I think Costner had it mostly right.
Had a conversation with my mother about Climate Change because I said something about supporting RFK jr & she responded with a disapproval of his stance on Climate Change. She thinks that its a waste of time and resources to invest into managing a seeming inevitability. Her argument is "If the world is "flipped upside down" that there is nothing we can do about that. My argument was that we can adapt as much as humanly possible, as we always have. Nonetheless, she expressed at the very least adamance if not intransigence about the subject. I hope I can get through to her one day.
Love Chuck's enthusiasm every time I see him on a programme.
Imagine for a moment playing D&D with these two gentleman..
Way before we reach that maximum, we’ll deal with dangerous water rising because of intensified storms and overflowing rivers because of increased precipitation. So for anyone thinking, we’ll be fine for a few more decades at least, we’re not. Cheers from the Netherlands.
so how long do i have before i need to move out of florida?
Whatever software was used to generate the images of the Bering Land Bridge is pretty sweet! The topography looks a bit exaggerated but it's a really great render.
i was thinking it could be ai
How warm was that Bering Land Bridge?
@@Apollorion Per the 2014 Scientific American article *_How Climate Change Spurred a 10,000-Year Ice Age Journey,_* "While most of the region endured dry, freezing weather, pockets of 'refugia,' or vegetated areas not affected by climate change, remained scattered along the Bering land bridge throughout the [Last Glacial Maximum] period. These unaffected areas provided the Native American founder population with moist, mild temperatures as well as adequate amounts of shrubs, trees and animals."
My husband’s family has been in south Florida for a few generations 4-5 at least. Our daughter will be 79 in 2100… it’s insane to think that her grandkids may not get to see her family home 😭
❤that's the effects of industrial modernization .😅industrial capitalism economic rapid growth .like cancer cells to self destruct.
This happens no matter people do but we speed up the clock.There is no coincidence that the last 10,000 have been the best for human civilization. Less land should mean less people so the planet will heal.
I have a series question. People always say that because the polar ice melts it cause flooding via global warming. It will then flood coast lines, but if ice has less buoyancy than the water. How much ice needs to flood for it to be noticeable. As we have seen before if ice is sitting on top of water well above in the top of a cup and it melts the water doesn’t overflow. And the outer core earth is supposed to be so smooth and so flat compared to something like a cue ball. Why would the ice caps melting cause that much land lost. Or would it cause that much land lost.
Neil and Chuck for 2024!
It's funny because forecasters have deemed Orlando a climate haven and it another major city not built on a major waterway. It will be an island of course but it's supposed to be able to weather the sea level rise.
That was deep, the humorous quip 'The Ocean is on board' got me♤ good show*
As climate change accelerates, the dynamics of coastal erosion, sea level rise, and extreme weather events are expected to significantly alter our coastlines. These changes pose challenges to ecosystems, infrastructure, and human settlements. How can current models and mitigation strategies be improved to better predict and manage the impacts of these transformations on our coastlines, and what role can technology play in adapting to these evolving conditions?
Chuck had me like the video in the first 10 seconds 😂😂😂
As a Floridian the beginning where South Floridia vanished was beyond crazy 😢
Second time upload
🤫
Alternate universe alert! We've been co-factored!