I cannot wait to get this for my A7c. The idea of having an ultra compact full frame HYBRID camera is just what I want and these new sigmas look like they’re the perfect match for me.
@@rigview i got my a7c for 2 months now.. and paired it with sigma 24-70 2.8 its a big though versatile lens but for a short trip or street photography its too flashy/heavy so im going to buy this lens soon. f2 would do it for me and its size🔥
Great review, you really provide some of the most thorough and accessible reviews out there. Like others, would love to see a comparison between this, the Samyang 35/1.8 and the Sony 35/1.8.
Great review as always! Enjoy your style of reviews very much. Didn't you think, as some reviewers, that this lens has an "almost too strong" contrast? Making it not the ideal lens for portrait work for example. PS. What art piece is that at 8:34 - 8:38 ? Looks like a metal face, very beautiful! (artist?, location?)
Excellent set of tests; I enjoy browsing your lens tests with their highly standardized way of commenting them. Two brief remarks: 1. The longitudinal CA is tested at rather close focussing. This may or may not not be representative for situations in which LCA typically impedes on image quality. For me personally, LCA at metallic reflexes or water drops at magnifications lower than 1:50 are the most annoying causes of image degradation by LCA. 2. Sometimes you include coma tests in ultrawide or very fast lenses, which makes pretty much sense. I would like to suggest adding sunstar characteristics to the set of tests, especially with wide angle lenses that often catch up the sun or other bright light sources in the image.
Thank you Christopher for this review. One thing I didn't quite catch from your review: Are the LaCA and LoCA performance better than the Samyang and Sony equivalents? Could you kindly provide a bit more info in this regard?
...yes, especially since the Samyang 35mm 1.8 has got also pretty impressive optics. It's faster and much cheaper. On the other hand I guess the build quality of the Sigma is clearly superior.
Not to sound too suspicious, but all the reviews and videos I've seen don't show any direct comparisons, only Dustin Abbot makes some verbal comparisons. When Samyang 35/1.8 came, Chris here made comparison to Sony right in the first video. I mean it could be nothing, but you'd expect seeing the most expected thing when there's a new kid on the block by now :/
@@PetrKlapper yes and especially pricewise the sony 35mm 1.8 is sometimes available for under $500 brandnew and if this is $640 I dont know how to justify it
Love watching your reviews! When is the new and final part of the i series, the 24mm f 3.5 from sigma, getting a review? that's what i as a landscape and nature photographer really am excited for!
So many 35mm options for the Sony system. I've been looking for one for a while now and can't decide. And there's also the rumor of the Sony 35mm GM that might come out. Choices, choices...
@@tian6499 it's probably an awesome lens. But I'm trying to stick to natively designed and generally smaller/lighter mirrorless lenses. I don't deny that yours is probably awesome, though
@@tian6499 But not as sharp as the Sigma 35mm 1.2. If you want to try truly sharp lenses have a closer look at the the Sony 135mm 1.8 GM or the Voigtlander 50mm f2 Apo Lanthar 😅
This design looks cool when it's new and clean. But it won't be easy to keep it clean, there's plenty of ups and downs in this lens design where dusts and dirts will stick strong
If i had noticed this sigma f2 lenses (65mm, 35mm, 20mm) earlier, i might not spent times and money for other lenses. Recently i made the change - turn out my camera have this new looks~ I just wondered why this lenses are not as popular as any other standard lens design
Hi Christ, i do like your testings, i do learn a lot from you. Thanks. I just bought a a7cr and looking for a 35 mm compact lens. I knew that you do like sigma lenses. So I went and bought sigma 20 mm dg dn. But I am still in process if taking a desition between sony 35 oss, sony 35 f 1.8, sigma 35 mm f2. What would you choose? Thanks. Hal from Spain.
Fantastic review CF! Your review system is brilliant! I would love to see a compart contrast between Sony A mount and E mount lenses on the newer Sony bodies. Is the price for the old A mount lenses justifiable when compared to the newer E lens? Thanks CF!
Hi Chris, would you have a chance to test the Zeiss Batis 25/40 f2 and 85 1.8? They're not cheap but I think they can be very recommendable. Thank you.
@@stephanpaier9887 Hallo Stephan, Sony teilt ja meines Wissens nach (im Gegensatz zu Nikon und Canon) die Spezifikationen seines Bajonetts mit anderen Herstellern. Dementsprechend können auch Fremdhersteller die Korrekturfunktionen verwenden - obwohl ich mir nicht sicher bin, wie "mächtig" diese sind, denn die Sony Objektive sind meist noch besser korrigiert als die von z.B. dem Sigma 85mm 1,4 DG DN, das auch nach der Korrektur meiner Meinung nach noch etwas "krumm" aussieht. Es könnte eventuell sein, dass Sony sich einige Funktionen selbst vorbehält. Bei Objektiven ohne Kontakte (Laowa etc.) funktioniert die Korrektur natürlich nicht.
Handling, travelling and response will be better with the i-35, but if your shooting and travelling conditions allow it then the 24-35 may be more versatile (esp. with an SLR in the stable). The combined weight of the i-24 and the i-35 is still lower, though - so you could also go for the twins.
@@fellowcitizen Thank you for your answer! I am not that impressed by the i 24 because it is an F3.5 unfortunatley. Otherwise getting the twins would have been the best choice i think.
Thanks for all your great work Christopher..... if you fancy a niche journey into telephoto - would love to hear what you think of the Fujifilm XF 200mm f/2. Thank you :)
can you revisit the famous Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM? your old review isn't as good as yours today and I would love to see the retest of that lens, especially on EOS M6 Mk.II. Always love your videos and love from Indonesia ❤️
Thanks, that was lovely. I am a bit confused though. "In camera correction" is mentioned, and I had no idea that the Sony cameras had correction data for third party lenses, and for a lens not yet on the market even. Is this correction perhaps made through an "algorithm" that analyses the images taken, and not based on the build of the particular lens? I just tested with my Sony Alpha 7 m3 and the Sigma 100-400mm with the corrections turned to auto and off, and I can not see any difference at all. By the way, I very much prefer the uncorrected images. 🙂 And it would be very interesting to se comparisons of the corrections being turned on and off.
Native lenses may provide the correction data via the lens mount contacts. So if the lens has the corrections, the camera can apply them. Even better, Sony embeds these profiles into the raw files so that Capture One allows for selecting the "manufacturer profile" which fixes the issues the same way. This worked flawlessly for the Tamron 28-75 while Lightroom users had to wait weeks or even months for a profile. So, there is no algorithm that tries to analyze the picture.
Part of the concept for the I-series is to make use of computation. The Art-series and Sports-series are less likely to. YK stated that he was initially opposed to computational correction, but after commissions for high-end customers who used them, he changed his mind after seeing the results and opportunities - though still favours optical correction. Sony and Sigma have to agree on terms to make these lenses possible, so there may be an agreement regarding corrections. Sigma have stated before regarding Canon that they pay for the legal right to reverse engineer the protocols. Sigma would include the corrections in the lens data in a format which the Sony camera would interpret. My suspicion is that some of the high-performance first-party lenses are Sigma designed as part of these negotiations.
@@ockelboi9948 you're welcome! This approach is basically the best solution to avoid loading lens profiles into the camera (like canon did) and allows using new lenses straight away with proper jpeg correction if the lens manufacturer handles that correctly. Especially film makers who often rely on in-camera correction surely benefit from that. Still there might be lens profiles shipped with your raw converter that are a bit different and maybe better, so if using raw, make sure to check if there is an explicit profile that might be bettet than the embedded "manufacturer profile". At least with C1 you have the choice. 👍🏼 Still I love my Sony FE 50/1.8 in terms of size and quality :)
600 USD for a f2, i know the size convenience but on a good offer u can get the f1.4 art for 650, i would have expected this lens to be on a 400 usd price point, i don't know if im dump or something
If you can wait seven years then I'm sure you'll be able to get the i-35 for $400 ;) I think the unique build quality adds to the manufacturing cost and appeals to the Zeiss/Voigtlaender/Leica + vintage Nikon/Olympus lens crowd, so the base specification isn't a good price of comparison. Consider that they may last as long as 2-3 lighter-built lens acquisitions for fieldwork :) The existing Art-series lenses are already distinguished by being well-built, but they're also big and the pre-2017(?) ones are not sealed.
I just think it would be nicer to have a more competitive price at least 50 usd cheaper to trick the client mind that is a 500ish usd price, at the end of the time i think either is a good option depending of what u look after, and u r right the f1.4 is an adapted lens for slr cameras the af is slow and is heavy as hell ( i own one) so even if is some what new for sony is not a brand new lens.
I'm curious why they decided to release a F2. Seems like a weird spot. They should do a 1.4 or 1.8 (even though I know they already have a 1.4). I'm dying for a nice small 35 1.4.
nikon aint giving away permission to work with their mount and info needed to make a proper native lens... it'll be hard to see these for z mount and rf mount anywhere soon, hopefully not...
Actually this Sigma is showing class leading resolution beating out lenses that cost twice as much: www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1686080/0 and Gordon Laing on UA-cam did tests where it performs the same as the Sigma 35 f/1.2 which is the best 35mm lens available (at least until the Sony GM). Dustin Abbot concurs that it's sharper than the Samyang 35 f/1.8 which is already sharper than the Sony 35 f/1.8. Native glass does not mean better.
There is always new public, besides Sigma is doing a good job on making “series” of lenses, for who want art, or This new one etc, so you get sone hegemony on your collection.
Canon won't permit it until the RF system is very mature, however, Sigma do offer mount conversions so you could use a Panasonic/L or Sony/E system for a few years, and then convert them to RF when it has the all-clear.
Sigma really missed a large segment of buyers by leaving out the aperture declicking option. Those looking for a nice compact cine lens will go elsewhere
And they have a lot of options. Us who don’t want a click-less aperture ring have been overlooked by many cheaper lens manufacturers. So it’s good to see Sigma catering to the photographers first.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Man I hope every camera manufacturer starts designing their lenses like this. Beautiful.
It's got some Russian lens design vibes, I love it
66
O0p0
i hope so too! I’m tired of holding a big heavy lens on my mirrorless camera.
Just don’t like you can’t lock the aperture ring so it’s a pass
I cannot wait to get this for my A7c. The idea of having an ultra compact full frame HYBRID camera is just what I want and these new sigmas look like they’re the perfect match for me.
Did you get now the a7c with this lens? How is it now?
@@rigview i got my a7c for 2 months now.. and paired it with sigma 24-70 2.8 its a big though versatile lens but for a short trip or street photography its too flashy/heavy so im going to buy this lens soon. f2 would do it for me and its size🔥
Great review, you really provide some of the most thorough and accessible reviews out there. Like others, would love to see a comparison between this, the Samyang 35/1.8 and the Sony 35/1.8.
Hope we see a comparison between this and the Sony 35mm 1.8. After owning the 20mm, having an aperture ring is super helpful.
I just bought this lens for travel and street photography, I like that it's compact and optically 90% of a sigma art
Great stuff! Been hoping that 45mm F2.8 would turn into a series, and now it has :-)
Christoper we love your reviews man, the best reviews period. Keep us informed sir!
Great review as always! Enjoy your style of reviews very much.
Didn't you think, as some reviewers, that this lens has an "almost too strong" contrast? Making it not the ideal lens for portrait work for example.
PS. What art piece is that at 8:34 - 8:38 ? Looks like a metal face, very beautiful! (artist?, location?)
Excellent set of tests; I enjoy browsing your lens tests with their highly standardized way of commenting them.
Two brief remarks:
1. The longitudinal CA is tested at rather close focussing. This may or may not not be representative for situations in which LCA typically impedes on image quality. For me personally, LCA at metallic reflexes or water drops at magnifications lower than 1:50 are the most annoying causes of image degradation by LCA.
2. Sometimes you include coma tests in ultrawide or very fast lenses, which makes pretty much sense. I would like to suggest adding sunstar characteristics to the set of tests, especially with wide angle lenses that often catch up the sun or other bright light sources in the image.
I'm a little sad there wasn't a section on Coma smearing like with the Samyang and Sony 35's. Would love to see a comparison against those 2.
Thank you Christopher for this review. One thing I didn't quite catch from your review: Are the LaCA and LoCA performance better than the Samyang and Sony equivalents? Could you kindly provide a bit more info in this regard?
I would be really interrested in a comparison between this one and the sony 1.8/35
It would be lovely to compare Sony & Samyang 35mm f/1.8 and this Sigma 35mm f2.0 at the same time
...yes, especially since the Samyang 35mm 1.8 has got also pretty impressive optics. It's faster and much cheaper. On the other hand I guess the build quality of the Sigma is clearly superior.
Not to sound too suspicious, but all the reviews and videos I've seen don't show any direct comparisons, only Dustin Abbot makes some verbal comparisons. When Samyang 35/1.8 came, Chris here made comparison to Sony right in the first video. I mean it could be nothing, but you'd expect seeing the most expected thing when there's a new kid on the block by now :/
@@PetrKlapper yes and especially pricewise the sony 35mm 1.8 is sometimes available for under $500 brandnew and if this is $640 I dont know how to justify it
They all similar and all overpriced! am afraid...
@@Jan-eh7nf The most affordable "good" 35mm 1.8 lens is imho the Samyang 35mm 1.8 for around 400€.
i don’t think the vigneting as a weekness. i love this defect, if you think it is so.
Chris, hope you can pick up a Loxia 50mm f/2 for Sony sometime, the sharpness is quite something.
It's insane that this tiny lens is about on par with the Sigma 35 f/1.2 for image quality (check Gordon Laing's vid)
you should add focus breathing analysis to all lens reviews.
sexiest design. I hope when sigma makes their fuji lenses next year this is the design they go after
I love the focal length, probably buying this when moving to mirrorless. Thanks Chris!
nice!
*Why there is no infinity option on aperture ring?*
Love watching your reviews! When is the new and final part of the i series, the 24mm f 3.5 from sigma, getting a review? that's what i as a landscape and nature photographer really am excited for!
It's not out yet although I'm curious about it
Oh yes, a Frost lens review after a long day of work.
Great review except for the AF test done on the same old A7rii.
So many 35mm options for the Sony system. I've been looking for one for a while now and can't decide. And there's also the rumor of the Sony 35mm GM that might come out. Choices, choices...
Sigma 35 1.4 is only 699, I got one and it's the sharpest lens I have ever used
@@tian6499 it's probably an awesome lens. But I'm trying to stick to natively designed and generally smaller/lighter mirrorless lenses. I don't deny that yours is probably awesome, though
@@tian6499 But not as sharp as the Sigma 35mm 1.2. If you want to try truly sharp lenses have a closer look at the the Sony 135mm 1.8 GM or the Voigtlander 50mm f2 Apo Lanthar 😅
@@stefan_becker I mean for 700 dollars I'm pretty satisfied
I'm thinking of adding a NEEWER fe to z adapter to this lens and use them on my ZF. Thanks for the review!
This design looks cool when it's new and clean. But it won't be easy to keep it clean, there's plenty of ups and downs in this lens design where dusts and dirts will stick strong
If i had noticed this sigma f2 lenses (65mm, 35mm, 20mm) earlier, i might not spent times and money for other lenses. Recently i made the change - turn out my camera have this new looks~
I just wondered why this lenses are not as popular as any other standard lens design
*Frost posts a video*
Me: I. AM. SPEED
P/S: Would you a three way compare with the Samyang 35mm f1.8 and Sony 35mm f1.8?
Don't forget L-mount comparisons ;)
Art 35mmF1.2
Art 35mmF1.4
Summicron-SL 35mmF2
Summicron-TL 23mmF2
imminent Lumix S 35mmF1.8
Would like to see a comparison between this lens and the new rokinon 35mm 1.8
Hi Christ, i do like your testings, i do learn a lot from you. Thanks.
I just bought a a7cr and looking for a 35 mm compact lens. I knew that you do like sigma lenses. So I went and bought sigma 20 mm dg dn. But I am still in process if taking a desition between sony 35 oss, sony 35 f 1.8, sigma 35 mm f2. What would you choose? Thanks. Hal from Spain.
lets see how far in price this drops because at 600+ it's hard to justify because the sony 35 1.8 regularly goes for under 500
Which is better in low light the sigma 35mm 2 or the sony 35mm 1.8?
Is this a stronger performer than the Samyang 35mm 1.8?
I really enjoyed your review as usual…also enjoyed John Mark Comer’s book The Ruthless Elimination of Hurry 😊
If Sigma makes Fuji lenses, I want this series to be the ones to come over!
Fantastic review CF! Your review system is brilliant! I would love to see a compart contrast between Sony A mount and E mount lenses on the newer Sony bodies. Is the price for the old A mount lenses justifiable when compared to the newer E lens? Thanks CF!
Is the MF on this lens mechanical or focus by wire? Linear or non-linear?
All autofocus lenses for mirrorless systems are focus by wire.
Nice review again! I wonder if you’re going to make a comparison between FE 35mm f1.8 and this lens?
Waiting for 35mm f1.4 dg Dn
Would love to see a comparison between this the Viltrox 1.8 and the Samyang 1.8 since they are all around the same price.
I have a Yongnuo 35mm F2 af lens. Pretty good for £70.
It takes the HB-47 Nikon lend hood which makes it looks really cool.
I can't even find it
@@KingFiercer_zip It's Yongnuo. I spelt it wrong
@@KingFiercer_zip It's Yongnuo I spelt it wrong
Hi Chris, would you have a chance to test the Zeiss Batis 25/40 f2 and 85 1.8? They're not cheap but I think they can be very recommendable. Thank you.
Hi! How does the body know, how to correct distortion and vignetting??? Thanks, Stephan
PS nice vid as usual...
There's a built in electronic lens profile in the lens of course, which is transmitted to the camera through the electric contacts of the lens.
Ok, that clears it up a little..... Thank you...
Since which generation do cameras have this feature?
@@stephanpaier9887 Probably right from the start. Even my old A7 has a "lens compensation" menu option.
@@stefan_becker I thought, it only works with native lenses.... dachte ich halt;-)
Thanks, I will try it asap....
Liebe Grüsse, Stephan
@@stephanpaier9887 Hallo Stephan, Sony teilt ja meines Wissens nach (im Gegensatz zu Nikon und Canon) die Spezifikationen seines Bajonetts mit anderen Herstellern. Dementsprechend können auch Fremdhersteller die Korrekturfunktionen verwenden - obwohl ich mir nicht sicher bin, wie "mächtig" diese sind, denn die Sony Objektive sind meist noch besser korrigiert als die von z.B. dem Sigma 85mm 1,4 DG DN, das auch nach der Korrektur meiner Meinung nach noch etwas "krumm" aussieht. Es könnte eventuell sein, dass Sony sich einige Funktionen selbst vorbehält. Bei Objektiven ohne Kontakte (Laowa etc.) funktioniert die Korrektur natürlich nicht.
I hope this lens will be available for Z mount one day.
I am not sure whether i want this or the 24 to 35 F2 adapted with an mc11. Any thoughts?
Handling, travelling and response will be better with the i-35, but if your shooting and travelling conditions allow it then the 24-35 may be more versatile (esp. with an SLR in the stable). The combined weight of the i-24 and the i-35 is still lower, though - so you could also go for the twins.
@@fellowcitizen Thank you for your answer! I am not that impressed by the i 24 because it is an F3.5 unfortunatley. Otherwise getting the twins would have been the best choice i think.
Thanks for all your great work Christopher..... if you fancy a niche journey into telephoto - would love to hear what you think of the Fujifilm XF 200mm f/2. Thank you :)
can you revisit the famous Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM? your old review isn't as good as yours today and I would love to see the retest of that lens, especially on EOS M6 Mk.II. Always love your videos and love from Indonesia ❤️
Test the Sony 20mm 1.8 please !!!
Thanks, that was lovely.
I am a bit confused though. "In camera correction" is mentioned, and I had no idea that the Sony cameras had correction data for third party lenses, and for a lens not yet on the market even. Is this correction perhaps made through an "algorithm" that analyses the images taken, and not based on the build of the particular lens? I just tested with my Sony Alpha 7 m3 and the Sigma 100-400mm with the corrections turned to auto and off, and I can not see any difference at all.
By the way, I very much prefer the uncorrected images. 🙂 And it would be very interesting to se comparisons of the corrections being turned on and off.
Native lenses may provide the correction data via the lens mount contacts. So if the lens has the corrections, the camera can apply them. Even better, Sony embeds these profiles into the raw files so that Capture One allows for selecting the "manufacturer profile" which fixes the issues the same way.
This worked flawlessly for the Tamron 28-75 while Lightroom users had to wait weeks or even months for a profile.
So, there is no algorithm that tries to analyze the picture.
Part of the concept for the I-series is to make use of computation. The Art-series and Sports-series are less likely to. YK stated that he was initially opposed to computational correction, but after commissions for high-end customers who used them, he changed his mind after seeing the results and opportunities - though still favours optical correction.
Sony and Sigma have to agree on terms to make these lenses possible, so there may be an agreement regarding corrections. Sigma have stated before regarding Canon that they pay for the legal right to reverse engineer the protocols. Sigma would include the corrections in the lens data in a format which the Sony camera would interpret. My suspicion is that some of the high-performance first-party lenses are Sigma designed as part of these negotiations.
@@magicalsnek Thank you so much, very very interesting!
@@fellowcitizen Thank you very much! Really interesting, had no idea they actually colaborate!
@@ockelboi9948 you're welcome! This approach is basically the best solution to avoid loading lens profiles into the camera (like canon did) and allows using new lenses straight away with proper jpeg correction if the lens manufacturer handles that correctly. Especially film makers who often rely on in-camera correction surely benefit from that.
Still there might be lens profiles shipped with your raw converter that are a bit different and maybe better, so if using raw, make sure to check if there is an explicit profile that might be bettet than the embedded "manufacturer profile". At least with C1 you have the choice. 👍🏼
Still I love my Sony FE 50/1.8 in terms of size and quality :)
Great, look forward to you reviewing the 24mm version when you get it :-)
600 USD for a f2, i know the size convenience but on a good offer u can get the f1.4 art for 650, i would have expected this lens to be on a 400 usd price point, i don't know if im dump or something
The f1.4 was so heavy, makes it so annoying to use
If you can wait seven years then I'm sure you'll be able to get the i-35 for $400 ;)
I think the unique build quality adds to the manufacturing cost and appeals to the Zeiss/Voigtlaender/Leica + vintage Nikon/Olympus lens crowd, so the base specification isn't a good price of comparison. Consider that they may last as long as 2-3 lighter-built lens acquisitions for fieldwork :)
The existing Art-series lenses are already distinguished by being well-built, but they're also big and the pre-2017(?) ones are not sealed.
I just think it would be nicer to have a more competitive price at least 50 usd cheaper to trick the client mind that is a 500ish usd price, at the end of the time i think either is a good option depending of what u look after, and u r right the f1.4 is an adapted lens for slr cameras the af is slow and is heavy as hell ( i own one) so even if is some what new for sony is not a brand new lens.
Haha yeah, in the end cheaper is better :p
@@fellowcitizen nah, it'll take a year or two. Not many people will buy it at this price
Is Canon RF mount in the plans?
Nope
3:58 savage
Was looking forward to this one
We need these lenses for Nikon Zf... :)
Yes we do ... Sigma has a nice opportunity here
Nice, better build quality than the native sony 35mm f 1.8
No
Pleasr compare to Samyang 35mm f1.8
I'm curious why they decided to release a F2. Seems like a weird spot. They should do a 1.4 or 1.8 (even though I know they already have a 1.4). I'm dying for a nice small 35 1.4.
1.4 and small is not possible
That will never happen
GM.
Sigma, please release these new lenses for the Z mount already :(
nikon aint giving away permission to work with their mount and info needed to make a proper native lens... it'll be hard to see these for z mount and rf mount anywhere soon, hopefully not...
I think i need one of these in my life
WISH it for Canon mount... Sigma 35mm f2 and 65mm f/2 DG DN 'C' lens
The distortion at close focus are large
I think it came too late. Now we have the Sony 35 F1.8, which is native glass and offers better autofocus compatibility, it's as as sharp and cheaper.
Actually this Sigma is showing class leading resolution beating out lenses that cost twice as much: www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1686080/0 and Gordon Laing on UA-cam did tests where it performs the same as the Sigma 35 f/1.2 which is the best 35mm lens available (at least until the Sony GM).
Dustin Abbot concurs that it's sharper than the Samyang 35 f/1.8 which is already sharper than the Sony 35 f/1.8. Native glass does not mean better.
There is always new public, besides Sigma is doing a good job on making “series” of lenses, for who want art, or This new one etc, so you get sone hegemony on your collection.
That lens may be meant for Sony A7c
L mount but not Fuji X mount? Fail.
Aperture rings, autofocus & filter threads, small weight & size ✅️
It's even better if you compared with the EQ of Samyang, Sony glass 😃
someone make a Sigma 35mm f2 v Zeiss Loxia 35mm f2 v Voigtlander 35mm f1.2
I wish they make this lens for Canon Rf :(
Canon won't permit it until the RF system is very mature, however, Sigma do offer mount conversions so you could use a Panasonic/L or Sony/E system for a few years, and then convert them to RF when it has the all-clear.
Itll be awhile
Thank you for the review! I should get one L-mount version for my Lumix S cameras!
I am sticking with my Zeiss 35 2.8 FE.
Meh, I'd much much much would have rather seen an updated 35mm 1.4 like what they did with the updated 85mm 1.4.
I'd take the Sony 1.8 35mm over this.
"but with autofocus" :D
Images are so sharp my eyes got paper cuts just looking at them 😂
These flaws allows subject in the centre pop like nothing else can
Cheaper Loxia(look)+AF
Great video, but also love your books! #systematictheology
it basically turns your a7rii into rx1rii, lol
Sigma really missed a large segment of buyers by leaving out the aperture declicking option. Those looking for a nice compact cine lens will go elsewhere
And they have a lot of options. Us who don’t want a click-less aperture ring have been overlooked by many cheaper lens manufacturers. So it’s good to see Sigma catering to the photographers first.
36th.
It looks like its a fingerprint magnet
First, fast!
Why would it be known as "i series"? There is a "C" on it?
Design isn't really great, too, but that's Sigma in their usual habitat.
Overpriced
Cheaper and sharper than the Sony 35 f/1.8, the Zeiss Batis 40mm f/2, the Sony 55 f/1.8, the Loxia 50mm f/2 & 35 f/2. So not really.
@@DriveCancelDC did you write about samyang 35 1.8 FE?