"Don't Use The Truth As A Weapon" - Jordan Peterson
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 тра 2024
- song: hardknock. - giving up
tags
jordan peterson, jordan b peterson, jordan peterson destiny, destiny jordan peterson, jordan peterson interview, jordan peterson podcast, jordan peterson motivation, jordan peterson clips, jordan peterson lectures, peterson jordan, jordan peterson god, jordan peterson speech, jordan peterson bible, jordan peterson personality, jordan peterson jesus, jordan peterson shorts, jordan peterson discipline, j peterson, jordan p, philosophy, stoic philosophy, philosophy lecture, philosophy of life, the right mind, the right mind, weapon, truth,
#jordanpeterson #weapon #therightmind
Doesn’t our Judicial system is based on that? for example punishing criminals using evidence (truth)?
Jordan is a Jim Jones or David Koresh wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Remember Jordan lost his fellowship with Cambridge University. He has no connection anymore with Harvard, and he is technically no longer an educator in Toronto. He tried to make his own University just like Donald Trump and it failed.
How can Jordan talk about telling the truth, because he has tried to decieve the courts and others in the past, proof goes as far back as 2009 in the Sordi family court case. Jordan needs to address as part of a disciplinary probation order, a period of suspension may be imposed prior to the effective date of the probation. The Board's Disciplinary Guidelines provide details of the conditions under which a suspension may be made a part of the probation order. During suspension, licensees may not practice psychology or refer to themselves as psychologists. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request.
Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Gemini? GPT? who are you?
@@DreamingConcepts my name is Steve. And do you understand the decisions in court and the scientific and evidentiary requirements that Jordan tried to fake?
What the heck are you talking about? Crazy… people have been going after Peterson and never mentioned any of this stuff. You must be on cigarettes!
@@Jbb7272 They never did the legal research, and never put anything together like this. These are LEGAL records, meaning that the cases are heard, Scientific standards and evidence are followed, and in these cases Jordan was thrown out of court or rejected as a vexatious plaintiff and sanctioned $30,000. This is simply the record, it cannot be changed and the decisions are FINAL.
@@stevengoldstein114 it seems to me that real, anti Peterson folks… would be looking into this. I believe that someone would have said something to Rogan and he would have inquired about it. A lot of people go after him… publicly… this is the first I’ve seen if it. Perhaps a different Peterson.
The Ontario thing is interesting. What are the details surrounding that? Can you expand?