Labour Party | Momentum | Socialism | TV Eye | 1980

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2017
  • A slightly shortened version of the original report.
    TV EYE previews the left versus right clash at next week’s all- important our Conference, explaining the argument’s within
    the Party, and publishing the results of two polls a straw
    poll amongst the block Trade Union voters asking how they will vote on three important constitutional issues and & TV EYE- commissioned opinion poll amongst Labour voters asking what kind of Party they want.
    25/09/1980
    If you would like to license a clip from this video please e mail:
    archive@fremantlemedia.com
    Quote: VT23744

КОМЕНТАРІ • 99

  • @roberthudson3386
    @roberthudson3386 2 роки тому +14

    Look at how 40 years ago the average person had such a much better grasp of policy than they do today. Most voters today couldn't name a single manifesto policy of the party they voted for at the last election.

    • @ow4744
      @ow4744 2 роки тому +5

      Remember that pretty much everyone who featured in this piece was not an ordinary voter, but an active Labour member. So they are not your average voter.

  • @robertmay9798
    @robertmay9798 2 роки тому +16

    Bill Rodgers speaks a lot of sense. Social democracy might be a bit bland, but it's far more palatable to the electorate than full socialism.

    • @uktravel8341
      @uktravel8341 2 роки тому +1

      'Full socialism' is what produced the NHS, British Rail, the BBC, universities, police forces etc. These things are or were entirely owned by the public , via their elected government. And other things could be as well.

    • @guidadiehl9176
      @guidadiehl9176 2 роки тому +2

      @@uktravel8341Pretty sure universities and the police force predate socialism, fam.

    • @Myndir
      @Myndir 2 роки тому

      ​@@uktravel8341 Since when were the BBC, the police forces, or universities socialist? These are the hyenas of the bourgeois!
      The NHS hasn't been truly socialist since 1951. It's a right-wing healthcare system.

    • @uktravel8341
      @uktravel8341 2 роки тому +4

      @@Myndir It's the principle under which they were created rather than the people who run them technically that is important. Socialism means economic activity run by the public rather than private capital so those things are socialistic measures.

    • @uktravel8341
      @uktravel8341 2 роки тому

      @@guidadiehl9176 Socialism dates to about 1780 or so. Robert Owen etc. Most universities and all the police forces were created after that time.

  • @iVenge
    @iVenge 5 років тому +19

    Until Labour returns to selection of the leader by MPs instead of people who joined the party two weeks ago, the party will be doomed.

    • @iVenge
      @iVenge 5 років тому +4

      Henry Silver Democracy is not spontaneous mob rule. Imagine setting off on a coach to Scotland, and then when you reach Birmingham, a load of people board off the street and demand that the journey be diverted to Wales. That’s what’s happened to Labour, and there is not only nothing genuinely democratic about it, but it is also the height of intellectual anarchy. The Tories will run the country forever as long as irresponsible and uneducated fools are let in to the driver’s seat of the party.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +1

      That’s how Blair was chosen. By the electoral college

    • @tomgibson6801
      @tomgibson6801 Рік тому

      So the party should be a dictatorship then

    • @jonmortermusic
      @jonmortermusic Рік тому

      @Bessie Hillum Keir Starmer has worked out well. Labour are actually electable again and the far left Corbyn cult are a diminishing bunch thankfully

  • @MrNinjaFish
    @MrNinjaFish 6 років тому

    What was taken out of the report?

  • @th8257
    @th8257 3 роки тому +16

    The problem the labour party has had for years - so many of the activists and party members are completely unrepresentative of Labour voters, let alone the wider public.

  • @edmund184
    @edmund184 5 років тому +4

    1:51 yeah right!

  • @Jim-Tuner
    @Jim-Tuner 4 роки тому +16

    @3:10 - There were two elections in 1974. The first one resulted in no party having a majority. The second one gave labour a three-seat majority. Yet the left (and specifically Tony Benn) acted as if the party had won an overwhelming victory and had a mandate from voters to implement massive changes to the economy. From 1974-1979, the best the labour party could do was just hold on to power. They didn't have the votes in the house to pass nationalization or consumer price subsidies. They also didn't have the majority to ride out the consequences of a massive currency devaluation. If, for example, the government had rejected the IMF deal and gone its own way in 1976, the government would have fallen.
    When the left of the labour party finally fought an election on their full socialist agenda in 1983, they were crushed.

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 3 роки тому +4

      If Labour had not accepted the loan from the IMF in 1976 the country would have been bankrupt.

    • @Jim-Tuner
      @Jim-Tuner 3 роки тому +4

      @@kevinlongman007 Tony Benn and many others on the left of the Labour party did not see the country being bankrupt as a negative. They presented an alternative economic plan in 1976 which would have involved a massive devaluation of the pound to boost exports, currency controls and import restrictions. If the policy had been followed, the result would have been to turn back the clock to the Austerity Britain of the late 1940s with rationing of basic commodities. Tony Benn and company saw Austerity Britain perversely as a sort of golden age.

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 3 роки тому +3

      @@Jim-Tuner That is the reason why the likes of Tony Benn were never fit to lead the Labour Party and why Foot stood as Leader in 1980.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +4

      The Wilson and Callaghan governments got a lot of legislation through despite having a small or nonexistent majority and those were progressive Labour policies

    • @JJVernig
      @JJVernig 2 роки тому +1

      @@briandelaney9710 In hindsight they where progressive, but at the time they were more middle-of-the-road. The whole country and even the whole world has moved to the right.

  • @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894

    Very obvious from this documentary which side the person doing the voice-over is on. Not the slightest pretence of impartiality.

  • @matthewking5612
    @matthewking5612 Рік тому +2

    The Falklands conflict propelled Thatcher on in 1983

  • @Albert-Arthur-Wison225
    @Albert-Arthur-Wison225 11 місяців тому +1

    Now, Mr Rodgers,..there’s a chap who spoke with proper aplomb and hood old common sense, in the Gaitskell, Wilson, Callaghan mode. Would’ve make a superlative PM !

  • @MagicNash89
    @MagicNash89 10 місяців тому +2

    Nationalization was such an obsession for many😅USSR nationalized 99.9% of everything and destroyed most innovation and productivity, still producing and driving cars that were copied from the 60s Western cars in 1991...and so many many things

    • @alanywalany6460
      @alanywalany6460 6 місяців тому +1

      Wow that's such an accurate assessment of reality >_>

    • @mowogfpv7582
      @mowogfpv7582 6 днів тому

      ...But oxidiser rich staged combustion rocket engines so far advanced that the US was still catching up forty years later.
      Yes I'd rather have a nice car too. My point is that it's not a question of stiffling innovation but misdirecting it. Innovation invariably comes from the human urge to create, not from the profit motive.

  • @tubularbill
    @tubularbill 6 років тому +22

    So Michael Foot is on the bottom of the list at 8% and he is picked as the new leader....gotta love the left...lol

    • @theSPUK901
      @theSPUK901 6 років тому +4

      tubularbill there wasn’t many to pick from and there’s even less leftwingers now thanks largely to do with labour scrapping a form of Mandatory Reselection in 1990

    • @grayssportsalmanac85
      @grayssportsalmanac85 4 роки тому +2

      Gotta love polls you mean

    • @Jim-Tuner
      @Jim-Tuner 4 роки тому +2

      Shirley Williams and Tony Benn were not even candidates for the leadership in 1980. Foot ran as the candidate of the left in 1980 for the leadership, not because of his popularity, but because he was the least unpopular figure on the left. The left also considered him weak and someone they could push around once he was leader.

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 4 роки тому +1

      @@Jim-Tuner Shirley Williams was not a candidate because she was not an MP in 1980...she lost her seat in the 1979 General Election!

  • @stephenholmes1036
    @stephenholmes1036 Рік тому +2

    Antony Wedgwood Benn might of given up his title but not his money/properties that was put into trust.
    Do as i do not as i say! My parents hard working class people who didnt like or trust him.

    • @Myndir
      @Myndir 5 місяців тому

      Always thought that made sense. He wanted poor people to be rich, not rich people to be poor. On that at least, Benn and Thatcher were on the same page.

  • @Dbdbe1
    @Dbdbe1 3 місяці тому

    Some of the predictions here are hilariously wrong: the 1980 conference turned out to be the biggest triumph of the Left e.g. in changing the way the leader was elected

  • @cBearTV-
    @cBearTV- 4 роки тому +8

    For any community to prosper and be able to have a social programme with provides vital services ie police, NHS, schools, road sweepers etc etc capitalism and competition is vital as taxes pay for those very important services, to be so dreamily idealistic to deny the need for capitalism in modern societies is I have to say rather foolish.

    • @izdatsumcp
      @izdatsumcp 4 роки тому +1

      All of those vital services can be provided for directly through private means instead of via the government.

    • @jonathanhadley2555
      @jonathanhadley2555 3 роки тому

      Those working (& have worked!) are already paying a NHS stamp! And still have to pay extra now for more services that have been privatised!

    • @jonathanhadley2555
      @jonathanhadley2555 2 роки тому

      @Bessie Hillum So everything should be private then...........................?!

    • @jonathanhadley2555
      @jonathanhadley2555 2 роки тому

      @Bessie Hillum So why do you pay so much in taxes then? Thatcher once said that Socialism was alright until it ran out of peoples money, so does that include Northern Rock Bank & The Lehman Brothers Bank?!

    • @jonathanhadley2555
      @jonathanhadley2555 2 роки тому

      @Bessie Hillum What really! So you dont recall Thatcher saying that then?!

  • @TelexToTexel
    @TelexToTexel 3 роки тому +2

    You can almost smell the body odor of those sweaty labour meetings. Red faced and suffocated by tobacco smoke, somebody should open a window to get in some fresh air.

    • @guidadiehl9176
      @guidadiehl9176 3 роки тому +3

      Back when Labour was actually still working-class. God forbid.

  • @monty1864
    @monty1864 5 років тому +6

    You just know Rodger is Owen Jones daddy

  • @kevinlongman007
    @kevinlongman007 3 роки тому +7

    If Healey had become Labour leader in 1980, Labour may not have won the 1983 General Election but they certainly would not have lost it as badly as they did.

    • @rogersweet3608
      @rogersweet3608 3 місяці тому

      But it wouldn't have been the real.Labour Party
      Healey only stood to stop Benn
      With the traitor.Kinnock help etc

  • @Lamilton82828
    @Lamilton82828 4 роки тому +8

    Labour members: can we have a democratic party please the right: trotskyists and tony benn are trying to take over pur party

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 4 роки тому +1

      No Momentum are trying to take over the party.

    • @whatamalike
      @whatamalike 4 роки тому

      @@kevinlongman007 Not anymore they're not. Outside of sharing crap on social media, they're not functioning in any practical manner anymore and not just because of the lockdown. Many pro-corbyn/left labour members are dropping momentum like a stone for many reasons but the main one seems to be their willingness to give into the bullshit antisemitism claims presented by the media as being a widespread problem within the left of the party...which of course it isn't.
      And no, being critical of the way the Israeli government and IDF treat Palestinians in that hemisphere is not the same as promoting pseudo-fascist ideas.

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 4 роки тому

      @@whatamalike The election of Starmer as leader over Long Bailey proved that the party still has a strong base of support for centre left policies rather than the neo communist bollocks favoured by Momentum. Now Corbyn has gone hopefully they will too. Also the fact is that Kier Starmer will prove to be a far more credible leader than Long Bailey could ever have hoped to be.

    • @whatamalike
      @whatamalike 4 роки тому +1

      @@kevinlongman007 Maybe I'm suffering from selective hearing, but I've barely heard a peep out of starmer since he became leader. Say what you want about corbyn, he was always pressing the point of anti austerity and a feckless working class suplexed him for his troubles!
      Nobody is going to convince me that a poisonous media full of self interest had nothing to do with December's outcome...

    • @kevinlongman007
      @kevinlongman007 4 роки тому

      @@whatamalike Typical Momentum thinking...blame the Mainstream media. Yes Corbyn had a rough ride but no worse than Brown in 2010 or Miliband in 2015 and both won more seats than Corbyn did in December. The manifesto was the main problem. It promised the Earth and people did not believe it.

  • @ysgol3
    @ysgol3 2 роки тому +1

    The brilliant Heffer talks so much sense.
    Bill Rodgers was a joke.

    • @ysgol3
      @ysgol3 2 роки тому +1

      @Bessie Hillum 🤣 I can't stand him either...no, his book on Enoch Powell is excellent.