Madigan, Quinlan and Williams discuss South Africa's 7-1 split

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @rusellsolomon1228
    @rusellsolomon1228 11 місяців тому +6

    I have never suffered so much anxiety in my almost 50 years of supporting the Springboks. Respect to a truly fantastic Irish team. I wish I was more confident in my prediction that Springboks will win tonight. Close Call !!!
    Please guys let the 7-1 thing slide now. Why was there no problem with SA playing 4 scrum halves against Romania ?

  • @moes786121
    @moes786121 11 місяців тому +13

    Oh God that malaka Williams .. still going on about the 7 -1 split

    • @scoobydee3954
      @scoobydee3954 11 місяців тому +2

      He's gona have a Stroke over it yet

    • @Kevin-lf4xx
      @Kevin-lf4xx 11 місяців тому +1

      A spoofer.

    • @mtw9471
      @mtw9471 11 місяців тому

      To be fair he was asked for his opinion. What is he supposed to do, say nothing.

  • @Jhetx
    @Jhetx 11 місяців тому +3

    If only the boks went with the 6-2 split , that would have eliminated the safety issues, right? If Matt Williams was in charge of World Rugby fewer countries would be interested in this sport!

  • @RikiLouw69
    @RikiLouw69 11 місяців тому +1

    Well done Ireland. Congratulations. But let's see who wins this tournament. Everybody will forget this result after the final whistle of the final game on October the 28th when it really matters. I am more vertain that the Boks will win this world cup than I was before the Ireland game.

  • @henkstols9326
    @henkstols9326 11 місяців тому +2

    The 7-1 worked again and the pressure was immense, couldn't convert though.

  • @glendaly3344
    @glendaly3344 11 місяців тому +2

    James Lowe picking up Etzebeth showed exactly what the Ireland squad thought of the 7-1 split.

    • @nigel8484
      @nigel8484 10 місяців тому

      That's just a really good tackle.
      That doesn't defy the 7/1 split and much more so it actually gives South Africa a great advantage
      They can empty the tank knowing that there a are bigger and fresher guys backing them up. (Hence winning a record 4th RWC)
      If anything the world should never complain about it they should learn and come up with countermeasures.

  • @michaelodonnell824
    @michaelodonnell824 11 місяців тому +1

    There was an article on Rugby Pass which pointed out that the 7-1 split is incredibly flawed.
    It became popular after the win over an under experienced and 14 player NZ team. But that article pointed out that if NZ have a full complement and fully experienced team, then the 7-1 looks troubling, especially with no experienced hooker among the 7.
    As we saw tonight, Ireland with a standard 5-3 split did better against the "All New" second half pack...
    Plus the lack of a specialist backup Hooker hurt South Africa.
    Plus, the HIA, halfway through the first half for Garry Ringrose showed the benefit of having more than one replacement back...

    • @wlk2408
      @wlk2408 11 місяців тому

      What game did you watch? You do realize the Springboks missed 11 points through missed kicks. Had they kicked those, they would have comfortably beaten Ireland. The 11 points missed through kicking are not the fault of the 7-1 split. The Springboks goalkicking sucks at this World Cup. They only have a 48% conversion rate, which is the worst of all the nations at the World Cup. In this game it was only 20%.
      The second half is when Ireland got squeezed. After the first half Ireland was leading the possession and territory stats you can look it up, that all changed in the second half and the Springboks dominated those stats.
      What safed Ireland is the fact that the Springboks played a very strange game. They had five players in their 23 that can play lock and they only started kicked for attacking lineouts with just over ten minutes in the game left. Why pick five locks if you are going to kick for goal with kickers that has a 48% conversion rate? It is stupid as hell but you can't blame the 7-1 split for the stupidity of the leaders in the team. Unfortunately, it was bad decision-making by the leaders in the team.
      It is simple the Springboks will not win the World Cup without a kicker. If they find one, they will be my favorites to win the World Cup.

    • @michaelodonnell824
      @michaelodonnell824 11 місяців тому

      @@wlk2408 *They missed eleven points from kicks".
      Why were they taking kicks from before the halfway line?
      Why was there no back up out half on the bench?
      How many points did they miss from flawed lineouts?
      How many Scrum penalties did Ireland win against the replacement Scrum?
      When Marx was injured, why didn't the SA coaches call up a replacement Hooker?
      The 7-1 split is flawed, deeply flawed.
      And so are some other "novel ideas" from the SA coaching team.
      BTW They don't have a specialist Kicking Coach...
      Another "novel idea"?

    • @wlk2408
      @wlk2408 11 місяців тому

      @@michaelodonnell824 They didn't even take a reliable kicker to the World Cup. The seven one split can't be blamed for that.
      They missed some lineout throws, but Ireland missed many more, so if the seven one split is to blame for the Springbok misses, should we blame the five three split for all Ireland's misses? 🤣
      The fact that the Springboks don't have a kicking coach is not the fault of the 7-1 split.
      The stats showed that the Springboks had a higher scrum win % than the Irish in the second half, unless you have some evidence for your claims I will take it as just some wise guy shooting his mouth if you don't mind.
      Sorry mate, nothing you say is evidence that the seven one split is flawed.

  • @arcanum24
    @arcanum24 10 місяців тому

    Matt Williams talking rugby is precious. 16 percenter.

  • @johnpeter3626
    @johnpeter3626 11 місяців тому +3

    listen to Quinlan the whole day...as 4 Matt...no thanks!

  • @AC-hu3xk
    @AC-hu3xk 11 місяців тому +1

    The Irish media is doing its best to talk about 7 -1 split..and Mad man like Mattt falls of his cot.......

  • @anthonyafonso3599
    @anthonyafonso3599 11 місяців тому +3

    Williams is n D👀S

    • @karlosdeevs
      @karlosdeevs 11 місяців тому

      joke‘s on you, bomb squad is a d**s

  • @wlk2408
    @wlk2408 11 місяців тому

    The Springboks has a 48% goalkicking conversion rate at this years World Cup. This game they had a 20% conversion rate. Had it been 75% like most other teams, they would have won this game and everybody would have said the seven one worked. So two guys that can't kick to safe their lives have convinced these geniuses that a seven one split doesn't work. I hope they remember that if Pollard should return. I don't want to hear, "but this time they won't miss all those kicks." 😂

  • @tauriquesedick2300
    @tauriquesedick2300 11 місяців тому +1

    It's a tactical change guys nothing wrong with it comon u guys are more matured than to cry like this really we in South Africa we are laughing over here we know u guys are scared

  • @robinholland2990
    @robinholland2990 11 місяців тому +1

    Well the Bok split is obviuos its maybe the only way to stop the Irish..we are in for a great game of rugby and as South African I am on the edge of my seat already about to start chewing furniture...come Ireland show us what you got and good luck for a great clean game to entertain the world to be played out between two very good teams....

  • @JohnMichaels-fs7bi
    @JohnMichaels-fs7bi 11 місяців тому

    It's not my job to education the presenters of why South Africa can do the 7-1 split. It only high risk if you have two injury and which is the same risk you will face with 5-3 split if your bench players is seen is second best. South Africa bench is like for like players. This still does not mean that South Africa will win the GAME. This is the second biggest GAME of the RWC.

  • @mtw9471
    @mtw9471 11 місяців тому

    Alan Quinlan who said that South Africa would win this game against Ireland. A guy who played for in a world cup for Ireland, wonder what he thinks today.

    • @Cenotaur1
      @Cenotaur1 11 місяців тому

      You mean...a rugby pundit was wrong?!

  • @mthokozisimyende787
    @mthokozisimyende787 10 місяців тому

    I don't understand these people!! This is International sport, you can't be whining about the opposition playing to their strengths when you can do the exact same thing. They haven't broken any laws. Why is this even a talking point? Is it because it's South Africa?

  • @davidpells4298
    @davidpells4298 11 місяців тому

    Where is the reseach that shows having more forwards on the bench than backs more dangerous? Cmon you've opened your trap and made these claims so back them up with facts and credible stats or shut your trap and let someone else better informed discuss this ..or ...go do some homework ..

  • @OhShoot007
    @OhShoot007 11 місяців тому +2

    One of the reasons I would love the Boks to win, if only to shut up Colonel Sanders. Put your pipe back in, for the love of Rugby!

    • @karlosdeevs
      @karlosdeevs 11 місяців тому

      Col. Sanders won😂

  • @vineshnaidoo9402
    @vineshnaidoo9402 11 місяців тому +1

    Mampara Williams

  • @Wolf-hh4rv
    @Wolf-hh4rv 11 місяців тому

    7-1 worked brilliantly, the Irish pack really wilted toward the end

  • @vuyaniman9440
    @vuyaniman9440 11 місяців тому

    Then Ireland should be happy…why the fuss.

  • @DavidSmith-yi8ou
    @DavidSmith-yi8ou 11 місяців тому

    Didn’t work.

  • @Rmac37
    @Rmac37 11 місяців тому +1

    Matt, stop digging yourself into a deeper hole: substitute Deon Fourie IS a specialist front row hooker, Start being objective, please!

  • @johnoriordan7419
    @johnoriordan7419 11 місяців тому

    The ref is fucking chille

  • @wlk2408
    @wlk2408 11 місяців тому

    There is no safety risk with a 7-1 split at any level. If there is please show us the evidence otherwise it is just noise from an old bitter and unsuccessful international coach.