i’ve been watching a lot of 3d printing vids and this one was recommended to me by the algorithm. It looks really cool, but i found myself having to look at your channel vids to try and see if there was a video explaining what exactly this unit is doing / why its unique. might be helpful to include a quick short blurb about what it is at the beginning of each vid to help segway new potential subscribers more seamlessly into your content :) keep up the great work!
Looking forward to the inclusion of the Nitehawk SB as I am planning a build of Misschanger using that toolhead board. The great support of your project is greatly appreciated.
I just recently came across the whole Stealth/Tap/Miss Changer systems... and i am really really liking the approach here, with being able to be a single toolhead if i want. Brings me to a few questions... #1 I noticed your umbilical having a connection at the rear of the printer which seems to indicate you can just unplug and remove the whole toolhead when wanting single tool operation. How are you working around the MCUs complaining and error-ing out when no connection is found? (is it USB or CAN?) #2 following up on #1, i am now learning more about the USB approach on the toolheads (even tho i am using CAN & TAP on my current Stealthburner). If i were to add more toolheads, i would use the NiteHawk SB USB boards for T1, T2.... and leave T0 alone as is... Any concerns with that with any of your hardware mods? #3 about how much Y you loose? I have the 350mm Voron and there toolhead fully covers the 350mmx350mm area, so this will obviously eat some of the Y for the hardware Thanks
#1. I made a add-on for klipper to swap in and out the the relevant lines in printer.cfg, and an macro to that and restart klipper to apply. #2. None at all. I have finished testing hardware comparability with 2x NiteHawk SB USB and it works fine. the challenge for USB tool-head will be: cost, and basement space. #3. if you are going with the NiteHawk SB USB boards. the docked toolheads will block the front 120 mm (Y) of your build area.
@vinny5915 thank you kindly for your responses. I will keep reading the GitHub and start the steps to get this going in next couple months. You got a sub and follower here.thanks!!! As a Mech Engineer, i will be willing to lend a hand in future.
Awesome stuff, just wondering, what are the benefits over the current stealthchanger system. I am going to build a system soon so need to decide on which one to go with. Cheers!
The most tangible benefit is the fact that MissChanger can easily be adapted to work on a Trident. Beyond that, it is not much of an advantage but rather a deliberate tradeoff. MissChanger trades the speed headroom for a more reliable first layer. I will say, though. Stealthchanger is reaching a critical mass in terms of adoption. So, it will be easier to get support with it. And, they support more toolheads.
i’ve been watching a lot of 3d printing vids and this one was recommended to me by the algorithm. It looks really cool, but i found myself having to look at your channel vids to try and see if there was a video explaining what exactly this unit is doing / why its unique. might be helpful to include a quick short blurb about what it is at the beginning of each vid to help segway new potential subscribers more seamlessly into your content :) keep up the great work!
Looking forward to the inclusion of the Nitehawk SB as I am planning a build of Misschanger using that toolhead board. The great support of your project is greatly appreciated.
I just recently came across the whole Stealth/Tap/Miss Changer systems... and i am really really liking the approach here, with being able to be a single toolhead if i want. Brings me to a few questions...
#1 I noticed your umbilical having a connection at the rear of the printer which seems to indicate you can just unplug and remove the whole toolhead when wanting single tool operation. How are you working around the MCUs complaining and error-ing out when no connection is found? (is it USB or CAN?)
#2 following up on #1, i am now learning more about the USB approach on the toolheads (even tho i am using CAN & TAP on my current Stealthburner). If i were to add more toolheads, i would use the NiteHawk SB USB boards for T1, T2.... and leave T0 alone as is... Any concerns with that with any of your hardware mods?
#3 about how much Y you loose? I have the 350mm Voron and there toolhead fully covers the 350mmx350mm area, so this will obviously eat some of the Y for the hardware
Thanks
#1. I made a add-on for klipper to swap in and out the the relevant lines in printer.cfg, and an macro to that and restart klipper to apply.
#2. None at all. I have finished testing hardware comparability with 2x NiteHawk SB USB and it works fine. the challenge for USB tool-head will be: cost, and basement space.
#3. if you are going with the NiteHawk SB USB boards. the docked toolheads will block the front 120 mm (Y) of your build area.
@vinny5915 thank you kindly for your responses. I will keep reading the GitHub and start the steps to get this going in next couple months. You got a sub and follower here.thanks!!! As a Mech Engineer, i will be willing to lend a hand in future.
Отличное решение!
Только не нужно размахивать руками перед камерой 😀👍
Awesome stuff, just wondering, what are the benefits over the current stealthchanger system. I am going to build a system soon so need to decide on which one to go with. Cheers!
The most tangible benefit is the fact that MissChanger can easily be adapted to work on a Trident.
Beyond that, it is not much of an advantage but rather a deliberate tradeoff. MissChanger trades the speed headroom for a more reliable first layer.
I will say, though. Stealthchanger is reaching a critical mass in terms of adoption. So, it will be easier to get support with it. And, they support more toolheads.