Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism In Less Than 15 Minutes (BRILLIANT!)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10 тис.

  • @kbangar1751
    @kbangar1751 Місяць тому +665

    I am from India, you all know my land is Hinduism, but I am a Christian not by my power but by the grace of Jesus Christ through his Holy Spirit. Amen. ❤

    • @bumblebee4280
      @bumblebee4280 24 дні тому +12

      Amen. Glory to God.

    • @SUJITHMOHAN08
      @SUJITHMOHAN08 24 дні тому +11

      Same here brother. Amen❤

    • @designdoctor247
      @designdoctor247 24 дні тому +9

      Amen Faith and Grace
      Ephesians 2:8-9
      "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast"

    • @SoulLegend-lm10cr7
      @SoulLegend-lm10cr7 23 дні тому +6

      Amen glory to God

    • @salserokorsou
      @salserokorsou 21 день тому +6

      Damn, you met Jesus? What did ya'll talk about?

  • @joshuawells5953
    @joshuawells5953 20 днів тому +214

    Its refreshing to see someone speaking at a university without being shouted down by someone with blue hair and a septum piercing who's only counter argument is screaming at the sky.

    • @jota7000
      @jota7000 18 днів тому +1

      @MCCALA7
      Probably tell them to not shout down the ones speaking love to others?
      He would also cast the demon out of them. Youd know that if you actually read the bible.
      Repent. Jesus loves you but that doesnt mean he will tolerate sin.

    • @Persil777
      @Persil777 15 днів тому +1

      Word.

    • @henrikborkchristensen7949
      @henrikborkchristensen7949 6 днів тому +2

      Maybe you have been attending the wrong lectures...🐾😏

    • @joshuawells5953
      @joshuawells5953 6 днів тому

      @henrikborkchristensen7949 it is a possibility. I'm open to hearing every side and I'm a hardcore centrist. But for whatever reason when really liberal people are involved they just don't seem to want a conversation. When they start hearing calm, logical arguments they freak the f out and just start barking or screaming. How can they ever get their point across if they don't even have a cogent argument?

    • @torvilasulvstle362
      @torvilasulvstle362 3 дні тому +1

      You are describing a trumper with blue hair....

  • @Ancient.Egyptian.Prototyping
    @Ancient.Egyptian.Prototyping 26 днів тому +365

    and this is why free speech, and critical thinking should never be silenced. ❤

    • @designdoctor247
      @designdoctor247 24 дні тому +6

      AMEN Ephesians 2:8-9
      For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast"

    • @Ancient.Egyptian.Prototyping
      @Ancient.Egyptian.Prototyping 24 дні тому +4

      @
      AMEN James 3:4
      “Although a ship is large and driven by strong winds, it is steered by a small rudder wherever the pilot wants it to go.” It's the same way with the tongue. Even though it's a small part of the body, it's steering your life.

    • @lolabear3230
      @lolabear3230 23 дні тому +8

      Richard Dawkins should shut down this nonsense 😂😂😂

    • @MuchasGaseous
      @MuchasGaseous 23 дні тому +4

      @@lolabear3230 Sorry, you're the one not making any sense. Just because you were indoctrinated and brainwashed, doesn't mean we all were.

    • @claudiomarangone614
      @claudiomarangone614 22 дні тому +4

      @@MuchasGaseous where is the evidence that all of their religions are correct?

  • @pamelajackson7210
    @pamelajackson7210 Місяць тому +189

    Bravo to John Lennox, who is such a brilliant scientific mathematician, yet is able to speak so powerfully and assuredly without a doubt about true belief in God!🖐🏽

    • @terryschofield1922
      @terryschofield1922 27 днів тому +11

      But he never produces credible evidence, does he? A grown, educated man believing in fairy tales.

    • @CarlyWaarly
      @CarlyWaarly 21 день тому

      Seriously? Brilliant? Obviously not, don't let the, "Oxford Mathematician", fool you, it is used in attempt to make their laughable argument seem plausible. Lennox gives no proof that alleged gods exist, nothing, zilch! Why would that be then? Not as clever as he would want us to believe, Christopher Hitchens ran rings around this fool!

    • @myopenmind527
      @myopenmind527 18 днів тому +2

      He was shockingly bad. Just count how many times he relies on argument from authority, a logical fallacy.

    • @aesthetic_BS
      @aesthetic_BS 16 днів тому

      @@terryschofield1922 hahahhahah sure blud

    • @bbgirl.8397
      @bbgirl.8397 13 днів тому +2

      @@terryschofield1922 No matter how much information and credible evidence people can give you about God , you will never believe that Jesus is Lord.
      2 Corinthians 4:4
      4 The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
      I will be praying for you :3.

  • @TotalSkeptic
    @TotalSkeptic 5 місяців тому +960

    I’ve watched this video a few times, and while John Lennox makes some interesting points, I don’t think the title matches what’s in the video. He doesn’t actually "destroy" atheism or prove that God exists. Instead, Lennox talks about why he believes in God and argues that faith can go hand-in-hand with science.
    The title seems like it’s just there to grab attention. If you’re expecting solid proof against atheism, you might not find it here. But the video is still worth watching if you want to hear a thoughtful take on how science and belief in God can work together.

    • @GitauSimon
      @GitauSimon 5 місяців тому +27

      I hate it but have to understand why they titled the video like that. Works great for the algorithm despite being somewhat BS

    • @TotalSkeptic
      @TotalSkeptic 5 місяців тому +49

      @@GitauSimon LOL, I think 'clickbait' is the word we're looking for.

    • @robertrlkatz6890
      @robertrlkatz6890 5 місяців тому +19

      God destoys Atheist, anyone with common sense can see that everything was created because something has never come from nothing. Give me evidence that you have seen something in your lifetime that came from nothing. Want evidence of creation look at anything you can see and it had to be made because it had a beginning.

    • @TotalSkeptic
      @TotalSkeptic 5 місяців тому +54

      @@robertrlkatz6890 I see where you’re coming from, but sometimes “common sense” can miss the bigger picture. The idea that “something has never come from nothing” is a longstanding philosophical debate, but it’s important to remember that just because we don’t fully understand the origins of the universe, that doesn’t automatically prove the existence of a divine creator. This is an example of an argument from ignorance-concluding that God must exist simply because we lack a complete explanation for how the universe began.
      Also, when you say “God destroys atheism,” it’s worth asking-how exactly is that happening? As an atheist, I’m still here in the discussion, so it seems like the “destruction” hasn’t exactly taken place. My main point was just that the video’s title doesn’t match what John Lennox actually talks about. I think it’s valuable for all of us to stay open to different perspectives and not just rely on what seems obvious at first glance.

    • @shabbyroadscholar
      @shabbyroadscholar 5 місяців тому +6

      The proof is rational deduction not empirical evidence. Life the MBR that he mentioned. That demands an explanation.
      As Aquinas and Al Ghazali pointed out... Everything that begins has a beginner.

  • @mikeandvaleriestephens5549
    @mikeandvaleriestephens5549 5 місяців тому +2221

    He does not attack atheists or even atheism but rather gives a solid basis for his faith as a scientist. I appreciate the respectful but unapologetic approach.

    • @BlackSun3Tube
      @BlackSun3Tube 5 місяців тому

      It's not a solid base. Just confirmation bias.
      Faith = ignorance sacralization.

    • @circusserpent9466
      @circusserpent9466 5 місяців тому +46

      So, God made himself from nothing, then made something, and everything originated from nothing. If you believe God as the most powerful and intelligent being came from nothing, then you believe in evolution.

    • @mariogreco729
      @mariogreco729 5 місяців тому +53

      @@circusserpent9466 Must God come from something?

    • @circusserpent9466
      @circusserpent9466 5 місяців тому +33

      @@mariogreco729 If God comes from nothing, he IS Nothing

    • @peterripson
      @peterripson 5 місяців тому +65

      He provides no basis and no evidence. He asserts that A, he sees a question that no one can answer (what came before the big bang) and then B, he inserts God as the answer. That's not evidence but like most people of faith, he states that Atheists believe "something came from nothing" is an obtuse mischaracterization that apologists foolishly use as some kind of "proof".

  • @hambam7533
    @hambam7533 28 днів тому +193

    I have 3 college degrees with a 4.0 in grad school and have done evangelism on the college campus for over 36 years and i have shared Christ with people of every religion and even PHD professors and i can tell you most people are still very open to the gospel even after decades of these universities trying to destroy God , they have failed completely from my experience

    • @mecdrum7
      @mecdrum7 27 днів тому +14

      You can fool some of people all the time

    • @Mjbeswick
      @Mjbeswick 26 днів тому +11

      Many intelligent people are open to the possibility of an external force being responsible for the universe and our reality, but that's really not the same as being open to religious beliefs which are functions of imagination.
      People are not trying to destroy God, but foolish religious beliefs that are easy to disprove. It's worrying how seemingly intelligent people cling to primitive beliefs rather than embrace the truth; if there is a god he exists outside of the universe and does not interfere with it, and so there will never be any observable evidence of his existence!
      It's hard for many people to accept that the earth wasn't created for us, and that our existence is using and properly inconsequential.

    • @DerekRuskin-v9s
      @DerekRuskin-v9s 26 днів тому +1

      What a load of fast talking tosh from our supposedly esteemed professor of maths!
      He sounds so clever by talking so fast that few have time to see the nonsense!
      He actually uses his faith / belief to prove a god for Pete's sake! Atheism stands up and god still ain't there!
      He does not seem to realise his argument is a complete farce! He obviously has never read the whole bible as I have.
      I am with @TotalSkeptic below
      I must add that his closing comments on Jesus are stupid; Jesus is either a liar or deluded.
      Three of the gospels quote him saying he will be back before many of those listening to him will still be alive! The second coming didn't come and won't!
      Christians don't seem to realise the insanity and cruelty of Jesus, his mother did (Just read the gospels completely for the absurdity of it all). As for being our saviour; he is supposedly saving us from the original sin of Adam and Eve who were just made up like all of the Old Testament. There are two Adam and Eve stories which contradict each other.
      Finally, nobody who wrote the words of the New Testament ever met him!

    • @johndaconkaroo
      @johndaconkaroo 25 днів тому +6

      Universities aren't destroying god. They're simply sharing our collective human knowledge, and it appears there are many gods who have better evidence for their existence than the Abrahamic religions. That's all and if you are as educated as you claim, try critically thinking about it. You're faith probably prevents it though

    • @JustinBrimhall-q8v
      @JustinBrimhall-q8v 25 днів тому

      Of course. Onward and forward.

  • @belli7639
    @belli7639 16 годин тому +2

    To save people 15 minutes, he basically said to things.
    1. My friend or famous scientist said this , therefore God.
    2. This thing or process is complicated or we don't know how it functions and therefore God .
    Basically argument from authority and ignorance ... Entire 15 minutes

    • @ahums16
      @ahums16 44 хвилини тому

      Only halfway through, and he said the opposite. Your own biased ignorance is screaming.

  • @あれくす
    @あれくす Місяць тому +182

    US trained physician. I too am both a scientist and a christian.

    • @BenjiBear
      @BenjiBear Місяць тому

      Many people with Science degrees are also members of churches. Many are non-religious. The psychology of belief is somewhat different to logical proofs. Aristotle suggested humans often lack the patience or skills to follow logical proofs but respond more to emotional or simplistic arguments.
      I personally like to apply science to discover the true nature of things including any godlike entities that may exist.
      People have many ideas about what God may be like but these ideas often differ. Can anyone be sure that the God they perceive is any more valid than the different ideas of God others are equally certain about. Science likewise can point to different ideas about the personality of God or nature of things.
      Popper's Scientific Method assumes that any ideas are conjectures we can amend with future evidence. As to the reality of any particular gods described in religious texts, there is simply not enough evidence to know such beings are real.

    • @Element-tu8jw
      @Element-tu8jw Місяць тому +6

      There are alot of doctors that believe in the duality of existence. Some doctors will say that consciousness is just synapsis in the brain but there isn't any peer approved papers to back it up. There is in fact a peer approved book that explains consciousness. The Bible

    • @dejanfun3251
      @dejanfun3251 Місяць тому

      @@Element-tu8jw subconsciousness*. It's that voice in your head that people fear because it brings them responsibility and punishment about some thing that they have done and they just refuse to accept that truth because, we have science and morality is just a part of evolution, so people can just go around willlie nillie doing bad things and then taking medication to sleep better. Make it make sense, bud. Subconsciousness is the word you are looking for.

    • @fazerianducati
      @fazerianducati 29 днів тому +4

      @@Element-tu8jwPlease demonstrate how the bible explains consciousness

    • @stonesmasher8369
      @stonesmasher8369 25 днів тому

      ​@@fazerianducatiplz demonstrate how it does not

  • @richardcopeland724
    @richardcopeland724 Місяць тому +62

    Not destroying atheism at all but more of a rallying speech for those that believe in God.

    • @designdoctor247
      @designdoctor247 24 дні тому +4

      Ephesians 2:8-9
      For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast

    • @vladislav6800
      @vladislav6800 21 день тому

      Better yet: it proves even further that dogmatists are rich on copium trying their best to bend reality to whatever nonsense

    • @OsakioyaGodsent
      @OsakioyaGodsent 21 день тому

      ❤❤❤❤​@@designdoctor247

    • @PDTeter
      @PDTeter 16 днів тому +2

      so do you think that X created X without X existing as he mentioned?

    • @johnmills1816
      @johnmills1816 16 днів тому

      Yeah a bit like Dick Dawkins rallying cry to athiests.

  • @yessumify
    @yessumify 22 дні тому +19

    So great that he decided to make this speech to these men 👏 Glory to God!

  • @vijayjoel423
    @vijayjoel423 5 днів тому

    Thanks!

  • @TheAndrew3032
    @TheAndrew3032 3 місяці тому +58

    A bad title, but an excellent talk. Dr. Leenox provided arguments against atheism but in a respectful way. He is pointing to the signs of intelligent design, he is hinting at the profound literary nature of scripture, not it's profound literalism. He is hinting at the creation account not being a literal account of *how* the universe was created, but the literary *home* story of why the creator made it and our relationship to him. He is asking great questions and encouraging us the listener student to be curious and go in search of answers. In doing so you will likely discover that God was pursuing and discovering you, not you who was searching out God. Fabulous and will listen again.

    • @gowdsake7103
      @gowdsake7103 3 місяці тому +2

      He did not present a single position that was accurate demonstrateable but assertions and strawmen

    • @lukkiecharm
      @lukkiecharm Місяць тому +5

      @@gowdsake7103 Watch again and listen as well. You will see his point.

    • @Mike-qy9zf
      @Mike-qy9zf 2 дні тому

      A touching thought. God is pursuing me. Wow. Too bad that such a sentiment is nothing more than an appeal to our emotions. Intelligent people need more than the warm fuzzies in order to believe in the ridiculous.

    • @lukkiecharm
      @lukkiecharm 2 дні тому

      @@Mike-qy9zf It's a faith thing. People for centuries have said drivel about proof and such when you can never prove the existence of A God or God until you actually have the evidence. People marry for the warm fuzzies and have faith their spouses will not cheat before they say I do. We have faith our children will not murder us in the night. It's just faith. If you think you can Scientize anything like love, God, faith, compassion, caring, need, desire and a host of other intangibilities, you're obviously seeking. You need to do more studying in to what it is you doubt without being afraid to touch on things that may be outside your current knowledge or abilities I learned a lot looking in to Newton's life..

  • @jeangatti9384
    @jeangatti9384 5 місяців тому +431

    When asked if he believed in God, Einstein answered :
    "tell me what is your idea of God, then I'll tell you if I believe that"
    😊

    • @bartholomewlyons
      @bartholomewlyons 5 місяців тому +6

      And what is the idea of god?

    • @jeangatti9384
      @jeangatti9384 5 місяців тому +45

      @@bartholomewlyons well I guess everyone has his own idea ... some have no idea at all
      When asked if he believed in God, Carl Jung answered;
      "I do not believe, I know"
      I would rather agree with Jung, though I would not say "I know" because it is rather arrogant, and it is not exactly a "knowledge".
      I would rather say
      "I witness His presence"

    • @tcrown3333
      @tcrown3333 5 місяців тому +1

      @@jeangatti9384 It certainly sounds grander!

    • @kandiitewa4972
      @kandiitewa4972 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@jeangatti9384 wow👌

    • @SMMore-bf4yi
      @SMMore-bf4yi 5 місяців тому +2

      Einstein, exactly

  • @mrs.g.9816
    @mrs.g.9816 26 днів тому +24

    What came before the Big Bang? "Let there be light!" BTW, I'm comforted by my belief in God and the afterlife, especially because I see so much suffering and cruelty in the world. I applauded with the audience after listening to John Lennox's brilliant speech.

    • @jt2473
      @jt2473 8 днів тому

      Yes, God really loves us. That's why God allows so much suffering and cruelty in the world, as you say. But, just as a thought, what if God doesn't give a crap about us and allows all the pain and suffering just to be amused by how we react to the pain and suffering, sort of like watching people being slaughtered in SIMULATED REALITY games like Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto.

    • @homosapien5623
      @homosapien5623 6 днів тому

      But what about the future? We easily forget that this is not the final state of the universe, the earth will not exist forever and neither will humans. Why does God want to wipe out everything he created?

  • @DrBovdin
    @DrBovdin День тому

    One of the most rewarding features of the University of Oxford is that these arguments are still discussed regardless of what faculty and which college is your home. Indeed one of my most precious memories of reading biophysics at that university is the seminar on whether God is explanative. With sound logical reasoning agnostics and even atheists would have to concede that even from the most pessimistic starting assumption (“God does not exist”) we could reach a higher than 50% probability that God _does_ exist.
    That should be a comfort to people with doubt in their hearts that placing faith in something beyond our limited comprehension is not a fools errand.

  • @roberthoward8578
    @roberthoward8578 5 місяців тому +742

    It's easier to defend the truth than to defend a lie

    • @holycat8312
      @holycat8312 5 місяців тому +12

      Noooooo.

    • @donjindra
      @donjindra 5 місяців тому +106

      Exactly. And that's why this man's speech fails.

    • @krookedarrow9869
      @krookedarrow9869 5 місяців тому +65

      Seems as though he's defending the truth pretty easily...!

    • @aptwo916
      @aptwo916 5 місяців тому +42

      @@krookedarrow9869 What truth? lol

    • @paulmartin8100
      @paulmartin8100 5 місяців тому +79

      @@krookedarrow9869sure he gives us a tour of how he views his chosen ideology but he doesn’t defend it, go into any depth, deal with any contrary views. It’s just a list of claims. Claims which need evidence. It’s not at all compelling or persuasive.

  • @kevinod771
    @kevinod771 4 місяці тому +28

    John Lennox had a nice debate with Christopher Hitchens! That’s worth the watch!!

    • @joetraxel7822
      @joetraxel7822 2 місяці тому +3

      Christopher was amazing with his knowledge and speaking ability. I can't imagine him losing a debate in which he argues a point in which he believes. Thanks for the heads up.

    • @gerardmeij-n1b
      @gerardmeij-n1b Місяць тому +4

      Lennox keeps on creating a universe out of nothing it is not nothing but a singularity
      such as found in a blackhole which is not properly understood but could well be the gateway to others universes and explain the creation of our universe

    • @lolabear3230
      @lolabear3230 23 дні тому +3

      @@gerardmeij-n1b agree , Lennox is all waffle 🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞

    • @SeanathanCreek
      @SeanathanCreek 22 дні тому +2

      @@gerardmeij-n1b Yet it can fail to exist and so there's no reason to think that it exists necesarily and so it requires a prior cause. Push back the problem again and again, but the properties of the previous cause of an original universe must transcend the properties of the universe itself.

  • @JimLogger-jo9ck
    @JimLogger-jo9ck 2 місяці тому +37

    Believing in God will be as difficult as you want it to be, but as easy as you need it to be.

    • @sparrowprince3432
      @sparrowprince3432 Місяць тому

      Agreed. Well said.

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix Місяць тому +7

      Believing that the Easter Bunny is real will be as difficult as you want it to be, but as easy as you need it to be. Surely you can see that makes no sense. Belief in a proposition is only rational if it is evidentially justified.

    • @Olivier-m9k
      @Olivier-m9k Місяць тому

      @@1970Phoenix Belief does not, by definition, need proof. In fact, belief is characterised by not HAVING any proof. Propositions and beliefs do not go hand in hand, since propositions require a judgement, which requires evidence, something the word 'belief' does not refer to.

    • @sherriepalmer2010
      @sherriepalmer2010 Місяць тому

      Belief is better said "Trust". Like all relationships, it's pride that destroys relationship, whereas Trusting builds.
      Pride prefers itself, it's own intelligence, it's own will. Humility with love prefers others.

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix Місяць тому

      @Olivier-m9k A person is rationally justified in believing something if there is sufficient evidentary support. They can of course still believe something without sufficient evidentary support, but this is irrational and not justified.

  • @krystiananghelo
    @krystiananghelo 3 години тому

    I salute you, sir. If Bro. Eli were still alive, he would definitely get along with you. It's rare to encounter someone who speaks with the utmost wisdom.

  • @Richard-darixdax
    @Richard-darixdax 2 місяці тому +40

    John is a treasure to humanity.😊

  • @Element-tu8jw
    @Element-tu8jw Місяць тому +19

    Reading Chesterton made me realize Im not as intelligent as I thought I was. Accept your lot

  • @squib311
    @squib311 4 місяці тому +74

    If beliefs were automatically facts, everybody would be golden.

    • @dulls8475
      @dulls8475 4 місяці тому +2

      So what facts do you have for the universe beginning?

    • @etiennedevignolles7538
      @etiennedevignolles7538 3 місяці тому +8

      Yes, that is where Dawkins really fails, his beliefs aren't facts.

    • @titaniumspecial4207
      @titaniumspecial4207 3 місяці тому +1

      Romans 10:9

    • @LGpi314
      @LGpi314 3 місяці тому +1

      @@dulls8475
      All those are much more probable than your fictional charedter god.
      Here is a short list of major theories about the origin of the universe:
      1. *Big Bang Theory* : The universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.
      2. *Steady State Theory* : The universe is eternal and unchanging, with continuous creation of matter.
      3. *Oscillating Universe Theory* : The universe undergoes infinite cycles of expansion and contraction.
      4. *Inflation Theory* : A rapid expansion occurred immediately after the Big Bang, smoothing and flattening the universe.
      5. *Multiverse Theory* : Our universe is one of many universes that exist simultaneously.

    • @LGpi314
      @LGpi314 3 місяці тому

      @@Anaklētos_Crow " ill take experiences " Delusional ones????
      "then i had NDE and died after surgery june 4 1994" LMAO. What a bunch of bullcrap.
      Do Muslims see jesus in their NDEs? LMAO

  • @mehmetdemir-lf2vm
    @mehmetdemir-lf2vm 20 годин тому

    this is a great example that show that education cannot remove ignorance, and there is no correlation between speaking gramatically correct and being logicaly correct.

  • @oneoff968
    @oneoff968 Місяць тому +43

    Honestly, this isn't a great talk.
    Most of this speech boils down to "I think God is the best explanation for some things that don't have definite explanations". That's not evidence or a proof of God. In fact, that's just just the God of the Gaps. I was expecting something NEW based on the title. There was nothing new in this video.
    But lets ask how he even knows about God? Some human told him. Belief in God is the worlds longest and oldest game of telephone.
    And of course, the ultimate irony here is that he criticizes the big bang theory as recursive ("X therefore X") and so not a good theory. This criticism of X therefore X is painfully ironic since the major theme of everything he says is exactly X therefore X
    Look at what he really says:
    "1. If things are complicated, God must be the reason.
    2. Some things are complicated.
    3. therefore, god exists."
    That's literally X therefore X. This is 16 minutes of a guy saying "I believe the Bible." Okay man, lots of people believe the Bible. He believes it for the same reason as anyone else. He was born into it and/or it resonated with him and/or he is uncomfortable with uncertainty. Doesn't make the Bible correct, doesn't make God real. Saying it for 16 minutes doesn't prove anything. There is nothing insightful here.

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix Місяць тому +2

      Why is it that theists who claim that "god is the best explanation" for something don't understand that a proposed being for which there is no evidence of its existance, cannot be the best explanation for anything. Existance is a necessary feature for something even being a potential explanation, let alone the best explanation. Until the existance of some hypoothesised being is reasonably established, that hypothesised being isn't even a candidate to explain anything.

    • @oneoff968
      @oneoff968 Місяць тому +5

      @@1970Phoenix For sure. This video might as well be a 2 second clip of the guy saying "I believe in God." But that wouldn't get a bunch of views.

    • @dragoclarke9497
      @dragoclarke9497 Місяць тому

      Thanks, much more eloquently put than my attempt. Guess it will be a long time before we can overcome thousands of years of religion's practice of brainwashing. Theses same believers would scoff at modern day cults while failing to recognise that the "major" religions are just older versions.

    • @bluemango8689
      @bluemango8689 Місяць тому

      Jesus died and risen again was a historical facts, not just belief. We don't need Bible to prove bible is true

    • @reinerruffel263
      @reinerruffel263 Місяць тому

      Absolutely agree 👍💯

  • @dany_fg
    @dany_fg 18 днів тому +8

    from what he said it seems he has no proof for god, and as a mathematician he should be ashamed to assume a conclusion without proof.

    • @gayewalkerrosser1001
      @gayewalkerrosser1001 17 днів тому

      I think you may have missed the point

    • @dany_fg
      @dany_fg 17 днів тому +1

      @@gayewalkerrosser1001 he just argues that god is an explanation, but doesn't explain what his god explain or any proof.

    • @gayewalkerrosser1001
      @gayewalkerrosser1001 17 днів тому

      @ but still…..the proverbial question still remains. Which came first? The chicken or the egg?!?

    • @dany_fg
      @dany_fg 17 днів тому +1

      @@gayewalkerrosser1001 if you are talking about the universe then we don't know *yet* , but it's not a reason to say instead "you don't know therefore I win!" because it's both childish and wrong.
      instead we should work to discover, not rest on your supposed magic solution.

  • @VingcamazibukoMqolawukhukhuzwa
    @VingcamazibukoMqolawukhukhuzwa 5 місяців тому +39

    I'm not an atheist. However good presentation of this motivational talk to Christian believers may be, it does not destroy atheism (at any point if the said 15 minutes)

    • @marvinc9994
      @marvinc9994 5 місяців тому +3

      Indeed - the title was ill-chosen!

    • @scomo532
      @scomo532 3 місяці тому +1

      He sidelined it

    • @margotmargot4426
      @margotmargot4426 3 місяці тому +2

      he clearly logically showed the paradox of atheism saying science pursuit the truth and by coincidence discovering physical and mathematical laws describing perfectly the universe starting from a postition humans are motivated only by survivor instincts then evolution based on surviving cannot produce science pursuing the truth because for each person surviving principles are different. It's a bit subtle and you need a logically trained mind to understand it. Dawkins red in his face during the whole speech got it perfectly and knew he couldn't logically argue that.

    • @herroyung857
      @herroyung857 3 місяці тому

      @@margotmargot4426 Unfortunately, this is a terrible argument and there is an easy way to logically argue against it. Evolution favors traits that allow species to reproduce and pass down their genes. For us, these traits include pattern recognition, abstract thinking, memory, etc. Our excellent memory and pattern recognition allows us to avoid circumstances of danger that we might have already experienced. Abstract thinking allows us to come up with responses to fictitious scenarios, and those prepare us for real life dangers. Then, these traits bloom over the course of millions of years, culminating with Homo sapiens.
      You see? It's perfectly reasonable for us to have evolved to rationally analyze the world. It's a trait that is favorable for natural selection. Then, science and pursuing the truth follow naturally from our language, communication, observations, and analysis.

    • @1glassMilk
      @1glassMilk 2 місяці тому

      ​@@herroyung857When I think of all the universe I don't think maybe there is a God but I wonder what it all means. Why is it here. How does it work. And to me the answer is that it is magic. We don't know. But we can guess. And I find this more interesting than atheism. Atheism just says there is nothing more. And I like to guess what there is. Certainly because I feel that the power of love and the mind still could need more research.

  • @KennyFisher-io4dm
    @KennyFisher-io4dm 2 дні тому

    Hear, hear, Amen Dr John Lennox!

  • @DrPalsgraf
    @DrPalsgraf 5 місяців тому +40

    _"But people are now so desperate to show that the universe created itself from nothing ...."_ (at 2:50). Do atheists believe the universe created itself from nothing? Or do they claim that we don't know what the universe was created from? It's okay to say, "We don't know that (yet)." We don't need to make up a supernatural explanation for things we don't yet understand. It's like all the mythologies created to explain why the Sun and Moon travel across the sky.

    • @ChristineHannahs
      @ChristineHannahs 5 місяців тому +1

      Mankind is not yet advanced enough to understand what God actually is.

    • @Diego-ps7eq
      @Diego-ps7eq 3 місяці тому +5

      Yeah as an atheist I think most of us just believe that we don't know what or when the universe existed

    • @beanapprentice1687
      @beanapprentice1687 3 місяці тому +4

      @@ChristineHannahs correction: we are not advanced enough to know whether or not there is a god.

    • @milansvancara
      @milansvancara Місяць тому +3

      @@ChristineHannahs well it's a word we created so it means whatever we make it to

    • @dfwherbie8814
      @dfwherbie8814 Місяць тому +4

      Prior to the Big Bang they believed it was eternal lol but to answer your question - yes, they do believe that. They won’t explicitly say it, but this is what you get from what they believe after they explain it

  • @berniegarcia717
    @berniegarcia717 5 місяців тому +130

    THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE!!!

    • @blueduck5589
      @blueduck5589 5 місяців тому +11

      Free from what?

    • @billiswillis8293
      @billiswillis8293 5 місяців тому

      @@blueduck5589 From the one and only enslaving factor: Stolidity.

    • @Mcfreddo
      @Mcfreddo 5 місяців тому +4

      And that is through science and knowledge gained. Evolution through natural selection. ('Knowledge' doesn't have faith anywhere near it; not even at far distance. How could it? Faith is the dark. The dark is the absence of light. The dark is not a thing of existence.

    • @billiswillis8293
      @billiswillis8293 5 місяців тому

      @@Mcfreddo Faith, from Latin fides "trust, confidence".
      Some people have faith in amulets, many people have faith in science.

    • @peterbrown2882
      @peterbrown2882 5 місяців тому +3

      @@billiswillis8293 The true meaning of "faith" is "belief", so stop using it in the name of religion. One has to believe in something, no matter what that something might be. And this has nothing to do with religion.

  • @AshKash63
    @AshKash63 4 місяці тому +8

    I totally agree that there is a creator of the universe! And what really brought it home for me was when I was studying human anatomy and physiology and cytology. There is an intelligence behind all the systems in the body, and I was in awe of it, still am. My question to myself at the time, was how can this beautifully crafted system that works so amazingly together be anything less than originating from some kind of universal intelligence. How can the Universe and the systematic laws it functions under be just random and coincidence. It doesn't make any sense.

    • @paulh1194
      @paulh1194 2 місяці тому

      Well said

    • @AshKash63
      @AshKash63 2 дні тому

      @LouisPerez-i7r indeed, and with all the new research on human consciousness, there is a blooming amount of evidence leading almost no doubt that there is definitely something beyond this physical realm

  • @kalabragg9361
    @kalabragg9361 29 днів тому +1

    Amen! Loved hearing this!

  • @Jiggerj01830
    @Jiggerj01830 3 місяці тому +12

    All he did was present the fact that Newton believed in god, and that his college believed in god. These things don't prove god.

    • @gameboy-bt7nk
      @gameboy-bt7nk Місяць тому +1

      That's because there is no proof. And even if there was proof, it'd practically be meaningless.
      Being Christian is based on having faith in God based on the arguments God presents you.
      If you only follow God because of evidence and not because of faith, the meaning of God gets lost. God will become just like a boss at work, telling you what to do and what not to do. Faith incites that you trust God in a way that allows you to form a deep relationship with him.
      Without this relationship, people will do whatever they want, God will lose his authority and power because he is forced to come down to the level of 'mere humans' (Just like Jesus did for us)
      The entire puppet theatre of trying to prove God is therefore meaningless, because proof does not equal faith and trust. Proof only provides a truth that God exists but doesn't necessarily make people listen to God. (Just like how people don't tend to listen to their parents, teachers, etc. because they don't want someone to have authority over them)

    • @testingmysoup5678
      @testingmysoup5678 19 днів тому +1

      You can disprove atheism but you can't disprove God

    • @Adepth7
      @Adepth7 16 днів тому

      @@testingmysoup5678 How can you disprove atheism? I assume you don't even know what atheism is.

    • @testingmysoup5678
      @testingmysoup5678 16 днів тому

      @Adepth7 the universe cannot create itself, newtons laws. A supernatural force must have started the motion of the universe. Whether it's a simulation or not there must be definition be a creator as it is impossible for the universe to start how we have observed it to start without a supernatural explanation

    • @Mizuna752
      @Mizuna752 15 днів тому +2

      Is that really the only thing you got out of this? You are handwaving away several points he made and I say that as someone not totally convinced by his arguments

  • @rogerreid5096
    @rogerreid5096 Місяць тому +13

    A wonderful dissertation of why God exists and everything points to God as the creator.

  • @rosalindearp8806
    @rosalindearp8806 5 місяців тому +61

    🎂The cake maker knows why they made the cake.

    • @naimeaeava5334
      @naimeaeava5334 5 місяців тому +6

      Only aunty Mathilda knows why she made the cake

    • @MarcusCicero1
      @MarcusCicero1 5 місяців тому +5

      Does a machine know why it made the cake ?

    • @subbasslines
      @subbasslines 5 місяців тому +3

      Does the cake maker need ingredients to make a cake?

    • @leongkhengneoh6581
      @leongkhengneoh6581 5 місяців тому +6

      the cake maker then blames the cakes when he made the bad cakes

    • @JelenaO-y2f
      @JelenaO-y2f 5 місяців тому +5

      Exactly! He create this world in his infinite wisdom and for his own glory. To create is proper to a Diety. Thus God proves himself to be the true God and distinguishes himself from idols.

  • @jrrd4069
    @jrrd4069 День тому +1

    Wow EPIC PWNAGE BRO! Can't believe millennia of careful, complex philosophical conversation about the existence of God can be boiled down to a 15 minute argument! Super real and totally not idiotic propaganda! Yay Jesus! Guess we don't need faith to believe!

  • @quinndirks5653
    @quinndirks5653 26 днів тому +30

    Atheism was not destroyed with this.

    • @JustinBrimhall-q8v
      @JustinBrimhall-q8v 25 днів тому

      Oh? You like it.

    • @designdoctor247
      @designdoctor247 24 дні тому +8

      Ephesians 2:8-9
      For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast

    • @sigurdholbarki8268
      @sigurdholbarki8268 22 дні тому +3

      That's a faith statement you made right there. Otherwise you would have provided your rebuttal, which I noticed you didn't.
      I used to be an atheist until I noticed that all they ever seem to do is deliberately misunderstand Christianity, present a strawman and then argue against that.
      Nowhere have I seen, for example, any rebuttal of Thomas Aquinas' arguments, instead they seem to ignore them or just outright runaway from them.
      But thanks to Atheists avoiding arguments and showing themselves to be the charlatans they are, I became a Theist and then a very orthodox Christian.

    • @aservant2287
      @aservant2287 21 день тому +1

      Professing themselves to be wise they became fools. In the end regardless if you don't want to be held in for your faults you will pay for it but Christ wants to pay for your faults. When you realize how wicked you are you and that you deserve hell you'll understand why God wants to save you from yourself

    • @CouldBeMathijs
      @CouldBeMathijs 8 днів тому

      @@sigurdholbarki8268 How was it a faith statement, there are still people who do not believe a god exist and so the statement is factual?? And by way of Thomas Aquinas' arguments, the wikipedia has a whole paragraph on criticism so it isn't grounds for a rethink of my non-believe just yet.

  • @Fr4Gz36
    @Fr4Gz36 Місяць тому +7

    this man is fabulous...we need more of these MEN....GREATTTTT

  • @inhatoyeptho2983
    @inhatoyeptho2983 5 місяців тому +5

    What a marvelous beautiful explanation of Dr, John ! More practical, more philosophical and more scientific. Love it👌👍❤

  • @SARMADRS28
    @SARMADRS28 3 дні тому

    im a Muslim
    no matter what , God does exists
    and this guy finally gave some answers to those people that we couldn't reach out, not explain

  • @geoffcrumblin9850
    @geoffcrumblin9850 5 місяців тому +18

    Atheism makes claims, only a request for evidence. As yet, none has been sufficient.

    • @Steve52344
      @Steve52344 4 місяці тому +2

      Evidence is the only reliable witness. Everything else are wishes, hopes and fairytales

    • @John315coco
      @John315coco 4 місяці тому +3

      @@Steve52344 True. The evidence totally supports why I can (and do) have a personal relationship with God.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 4 місяці тому +1

      @@John315coco MAN, did you read that comment incorrectly. And I think he meant to write 'no claims', because otherwise, that sentence and statement makes no logical sense.
      What EVIDENCE are you referring to? Even the bible says that it is faith alone. There IS NO evidence.

  • @paulmartin4401
    @paulmartin4401 3 місяці тому +6

    Wow what a powerful testimony

  • @jimmymac9388
    @jimmymac9388 4 місяці тому +25

    I just wish God would put in an appearance every 50 years or so, hold a press conference and put an end to all this.

    • @luisalthoff
      @luisalthoff 4 місяці тому +3

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @brucewilliams7218
      @brucewilliams7218 4 місяці тому

      You have a greater chance of Kamala Harris doing that!

    • @claymoreland1946
      @claymoreland1946 4 місяці тому

      Well if the bible is any indicator, that doesn't really work. People still turn to false gods, hedonism etc. mere days after seeing some crazy miracle.

    • @eddiehernandez7806
      @eddiehernandez7806 4 місяці тому +2

      One day on His time. GOD'S timing is perfect

    • @sakthivelponnusamy9329
      @sakthivelponnusamy9329 4 місяці тому +4

      thats why he doesnt exist

  • @MoboladeOladele-y4t
    @MoboladeOladele-y4t 4 дні тому

    This is a really wonderful video. Thanks so much Pastor Daniel for sharing this.

  • @edkudray2060
    @edkudray2060 5 місяців тому +22

    Wise words indeed
    Science and faith have always been linked. But they don't want you to make that connection today. Today they want you to believe science and faith are separate. Can't believe in one without the other. For nothing has ever been created from nothing

    • @ronkempke6673
      @ronkempke6673 5 місяців тому +2

      I guess you're ignorant of the big bang singularity.

    • @k7jeb
      @k7jeb 5 місяців тому

      Yeah, science has acquired these bad habits of insisting on self-consistency, repeatability, falsifiability and logical directness (among others). If God appeared to a scientist, he or she would probably want him to come back the next day for a urine sample and a DNA swab.

    • @mysticjen379
      @mysticjen379 5 місяців тому +4

      @@ronkempke6673That apparently came from nothing…

    • @edkudray2060
      @edkudray2060 5 місяців тому +2

      @@ronkempke6673 no I'm not last I checked it's still a theory....you know what a theory is right...

    • @gssr1
      @gssr1 5 місяців тому

      @@edkudray2060 Science and faith are not linked. Science is the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained. Faith requires no study or testing of evidence. As for the nothing argument; there is nothing about atheism that expresses any view point on that issue. And the big bang does not presume that something came from nothing; only that our known universe came from a singularity. It does not presume to know what may or may not have existed prior to that moment. Lastly, you appear to want to use the grade school definition of 'theory,' as opposed to how that term is used in science.

  • @relyks8645
    @relyks8645 3 місяці тому +16

    So he "destroys" Atheism, by talking for 15 minutes straight with nobody able to argue against him? Okay.

    • @beegs7746
      @beegs7746 3 місяці тому

      Watch a debate between Lennox and Richard Dawkins

    • @alphamale617
      @alphamale617 3 місяці тому

      Maybe you destroy creationism by arguing your head against your dick Einstein

  • @JeffRyman69
    @JeffRyman69 5 місяців тому +16

    You can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God by logical argument or by observation of the world. You either believe or you don't.

    • @raass233
      @raass233 5 місяців тому

      Circumstantial evidence is evidence.

    • @BUNCHAPUNCHISTAKEN
      @BUNCHAPUNCHISTAKEN 5 місяців тому +1

      You cannot DISPROVE something that has never been proven. No god has ever been proven to date. Arguments are not evidence.

    • @novakaya
      @novakaya 5 місяців тому +3

      Yet the evidence is so all ever present and obvious in our own existence and the intricate grandeur and design of the observable world that we are inseparably woven into it can seem non-existence
      That we exist is literally the only and greatest proof of God available and you are afloat in it and sustained by it with every breath you take

    • @BUNCHAPUNCHISTAKEN
      @BUNCHAPUNCHISTAKEN 5 місяців тому

      @@novakaya How do our existence prove your particular god? Could be Zeus, or the great spider of Nigerian creation myth, or the ancient mother of native American legends. How us existing and all the wonders whatever is the result of your specific god?

    • @JeffRyman69
      @JeffRyman69 5 місяців тому

      @@novakaya The existence of the universe is not evidence for a Creator. You are predisposed to believe in a Creator so that makes sense to you. There are physics hypotheses to explain the universe coming into existence from nothing. That doesn't mean those hypotheses are correct either. So far there is no way to look back before the moment of the big bang to find evidence for either a Creator or the physics hypotheses.

  • @luigiperrone8169
    @luigiperrone8169 3 дні тому

    Hope relies on faith that suffering is not meaningless. But faith, by definition, assumes possibility of the undesired outcome.

  • @catzzzvd2635
    @catzzzvd2635 2 місяці тому +8

    ❤EXCELLENT GOD BLESS THEM IN JESUS NAME AMEN 🙏 FROM SOUTH AFRICA ❤🔥✝️🕊🙌

  • @leole4126
    @leole4126 4 місяці тому +12

    I love Prof Lennox. God bless him more and more. He is very humble, therefore he can speak to his colleagues at famous university in UK. Thank you for sharing.

    • @JanWnogu
      @JanWnogu 3 місяці тому

      I agree that he gives his speech in a cultured manner, but it does not make it true.

  • @NisseOhlsen
    @NisseOhlsen 2 місяці тому +17

    It is called 'belief' for a reason. Otherwise it would be called 'proof'.

    • @TheLyricalMouse
      @TheLyricalMouse Місяць тому +1

      @@NisseOhlsen just like the belief in evolution, am I right? 😁 that's still yet to be proven.

    • @NisseOhlsen
      @NisseOhlsen Місяць тому +1

      @@TheLyricalMouse it's called a 'theory', not 'belief'. It commands no altars and causes no wars.

    • @TheLyricalMouse
      @TheLyricalMouse Місяць тому

      @NisseOhlsen evolution is theory for a reason. Otherwise, it would be called proof.

    • @NisseOhlsen
      @NisseOhlsen Місяць тому

      @@TheLyricalMouse yes. And God is not even a theory. It is mere belief. Like Santa Claus.

    • @unpopularopinions9076
      @unpopularopinions9076 Місяць тому

      I don’t believe you are being genuine in your listening of this speech. Your preconceived notions have limited your curiosity and dampened your ability to learn.

  • @charlie15627
    @charlie15627 19 днів тому +1

    That was a powerful sermon

  • @filborarroyo7942
    @filborarroyo7942 5 місяців тому +33

    Lies ended when confronted with "TRUTH".

    • @mbc4240
      @mbc4240 5 місяців тому

      Which of the two you consider a lie and which one you consider as truth?

    • @JanWnogu
      @JanWnogu 3 місяці тому +2

      At what moment? He pushed those religious lies to the very end.

  • @Bobby-l5i
    @Bobby-l5i 5 місяців тому +8

    That guy didn’t say anything worth listening to.

    • @marvinc9994
      @marvinc9994 5 місяців тому

      In which case, he must hope to survive your displeasure!

    • @LerataPhatsoane
      @LerataPhatsoane 5 місяців тому +2

      This just over your head, you have to be at a certain intellectual level to make head or tail of this statement

    • @colins2
      @colins2 4 місяці тому

      @@LerataPhatsoane No, you just have to believe in fairies.

  • @gloriousturtlegeneral8575
    @gloriousturtlegeneral8575 2 місяці тому +6

    John 7:18
    18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him.

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix Місяць тому +1

      But John Lennox has made statements that are demonstrably untrue. Wouldn't that prove John 7:18 wrong?

  • @calvinx1959
    @calvinx1959 Місяць тому +2

    Quand on ne comprends pas, c'est plus facile de croire...

    • @khalil4978
      @khalil4978 21 день тому

      et je suppose que vous comprenez les choses mieux et plus qu'un Mathématicien renommé à Oxford

  • @gregorymorehart9142
    @gregorymorehart9142 Місяць тому +13

    God has given us free will. Choose this day whom you will serve. As for me and my house we will serve the Lord . And by chance that I worship God and in the end find out he doesn't exist, then what have I lost ? Nothing. However, if I don't believe and he does exists and then I will have lost everything even my very soul .

    • @simonehanna8046
      @simonehanna8046 Місяць тому

      And there it is…choice. Believe, don’t believe. He gave you the option.

    • @asterixx6878
      @asterixx6878 Місяць тому +1

      Are you afraid of 'god'?

    • @rafaelmuradyan2477
      @rafaelmuradyan2477 Місяць тому

      I assure you there is God and in heaven the King is our Lord Jesus Christ. You are on the right path, don’t doubt, but be confident and keep your faith all the way . The overcomers will sit with our Lord Jesus Christ on His table . Jesus Christ bless you and your household .

    • @otapi
      @otapi Місяць тому +1

      You risk to believe in the wrong God. What if the only true god is Baal? Or Allah? Or Zeus? Or Thor? You would still happen to go to some kind of hell if you choose the an other god than the 'true' one. Also, does it fit to your ethics to follow and worship someone who threathents you with pain and suffer?

    • @grassprietje9500
      @grassprietje9500 Місяць тому +1

      @otapi
      Iedereen voelt toch wel aan dat "heb je naaste lief als jezelf "de hoogste moraal is. Dit is de belangrijkste regel hoe je met de ander om moet gaan volgens de bijbel.
      De andere godsdiensten die ik ken hebben dit niet als belangrijkste regel.
      Bovendien had deze God ook de grootste liefde door te sterven voor de mensen om zo de vloek van de zonde te verbreken. Welke God doet nou zoiets? Dit verzint geen mens.

  • @markfisher5019
    @markfisher5019 4 місяці тому +8

    15 minutes of waffle, bluster and quotes of past scholars but absolutely zero content to discredit the atheist position. He can believe and have faith in whatever makes him feel comfortable, that doesn’t make it so.

    • @finarony
      @finarony 4 місяці тому

      Nonsense remains nonsense even if uncle Barry from Facebook is uttering it

    • @JanWnogu
      @JanWnogu 3 місяці тому +1

      The only thing he has "destroyed" in this video is his reputation as a scientist (who should understand, what makes a viable argument and what does not).

  • @The_Blessed_Cowboy
    @The_Blessed_Cowboy 5 місяців тому +60

    What was there before there was something? If something came from nothing, then even nothing was something!

    • @olivertulabing7547
      @olivertulabing7547 5 місяців тому +15

      There was God before something.

    • @The_Blessed_Cowboy
      @The_Blessed_Cowboy 5 місяців тому +5

      @@olivertulabing7547 exactly!

    • @Nutterbutter123
      @Nutterbutter123 5 місяців тому +11

      @@The_Blessed_Cowboy
      I forgot who it was that asked “what does a rock think of? Nothing… and that’s what atheists believe began everything”

    • @The_Blessed_Cowboy
      @The_Blessed_Cowboy 5 місяців тому +6

      @@Nutterbutter123 it's a hard thing for most people to wrap their heads around when they think what was there before creation? Obviously God! It still drives me a bit crazy trying to even think about it. I try and approach it with child like faith. Perhaps one day God will reveal it to all His people.

    • @Nutterbutter123
      @Nutterbutter123 5 місяців тому +5

      @@The_Blessed_Cowboy well, take into account some people who don’t believe in God justify their views with what they perceive as logical reasoning- like they’ve never experienced personal evidence or they can’t wrap their head around what the Bible speaks of or they only go by what’s in front of their eyes.
      Then there’s those with personal grievance or place their own morals against the very Author such as anger towards a church or church goers, or they cant understand why God allows evil and therefore summarize because He can’t exist, or that science is the only explanation and what it can’t explain now it will one day with enough data, or that they’ve experience horrible things and have anger towards Him. People have their reasons and don’t put the effort in beginning a relationship with Him.
      And if they do believe in a creator, they have an idea of what a creator is to them and sometimes they don’t like a God that would pour His wrath on His Son, not understanding the necessity of it.
      Or sometimes it’s as simple as they can’t decide which church is “right”, so they don’t go at all and don’t attempt anything
      It’s a hard thing for some to grasp, because it would mean a very deep and profound change in lifestyle, drastically for most.
      Submission requires a lot for the stubborn and stiff-necked.
      We got to have empathy for them, and when we come across a non believer in love, it’s important to talk to them humbly and question in sincerity why they justify either a disinterest or an anger towards Him. And then work in that direction.

  • @randylothrop975
    @randylothrop975 8 днів тому

    I've never seen such word salad anointed brilliance.

    • @rdkayyvalorant
      @rdkayyvalorant 8 днів тому

      Do you think the universe created itself? There was nothing before the big bang to create, or cause it. So it either had to create itself, which anyone that has common sense knows is impossible, or God caused it.

  • @PaulSmith-wz2xv
    @PaulSmith-wz2xv Місяць тому +5

    are good Christians allowed to lie ? Lennox has never destroyed any serious non believer.

    • @Element-tu8jw
      @Element-tu8jw Місяць тому +1

      Due to free will, you can lie if you choose

    • @aliciamoore5722
      @aliciamoore5722 Місяць тому

      Are you serious about this question🤔

  • @hahaokaywhatever865
    @hahaokaywhatever865 5 місяців тому +6

    Pastor MAN has DESTROYED Atheism by putting words in ALL CAPS

  • @josephwells8699
    @josephwells8699 5 місяців тому +17

    "We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts". 2 Peter 1:19

    • @Known-unknowns
      @Known-unknowns 5 місяців тому +1

      Speak properly. You sound like you’re trying to impress me ? You’re not.

    • @dareese6778
      @dareese6778 5 місяців тому +1

      Quotes have zero to do with actualities; just guys from a long time ago expressing their agendas.

    • @josephwells8699
      @josephwells8699 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Known-unknowns I am not trying to impress you, I am just quoting a Bible verse. Prophecy is very important, it authenticates the Bible.

    • @berniethebolt3007
      @berniethebolt3007 5 місяців тому +1

      Yes, you are. But please don't. It's enormously insulting to human intelligence. But I guess you know that. That's why you do it.

    • @josephwells8699
      @josephwells8699 5 місяців тому +3

      @@berniethebolt3007 All I am trying to do is spread the truth of God's word, because it is the only REAL truth available. Evolution is enormously insulting to human intelligence. I am guessing that you are an evolutionist.
      What is happening in this world today, and it is going to get much worse, the Bible prophesied. We are on the verge of eternity and Jesus is coming back for His people, those who have accepted His death on their behalf. Those who reject Christ will not survive, if the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross does not move people, nothing will. I wish you well.

  • @Aquastan-de2iq
    @Aquastan-de2iq 11 днів тому

    thank you pastor daniel for sharing The Will and Graces of A One True Living God , with the whole world - Thank You

  • @GaryBetz
    @GaryBetz 3 місяці тому +36

    Absolutely excellent 👏so grateful that GOD is who He is, gracious, merciful, kind, faithful, loving & just.

    • @spendover
      @spendover 2 місяці тому +3

      So what about all the evil and torture in the world?

    • @TheCriticalPolitician
      @TheCriticalPolitician 2 місяці тому +5

      You are talking about the being that designed the food chain in which animals have to brutally kill each other to survive? Have you ever seen a falcon eating a prey when it's still alive? Merciful right? Or are you talking about the being that designed bio-robots (yes, us) and then blamed the robots for all the software bugs he himself put in? The being that watches us torturing, killing and raping each other in the most sadistic and horrendous ways and does nothing?
      And if you are referring to that being, where do gracious, merciful, kind, faithful, loving & just come in exactly?

    • @lockedout8643
      @lockedout8643 2 місяці тому +4

      If only gods prophets, priests, imams and followers were the same. All I hear is " obey god how I tell you too or you'll live in eternal damnation".

    • @paulh1194
      @paulh1194 2 місяці тому

      @@spendover I remember a story of a man living in the slums of Brazil and looking intently at the high towering buildings that were beyond his reach. Desiring to be able to live there, than his current abode. His heart began to yearn for things that didn't belong to him..... Well, why this story? Same as an angel that desired what didn't belong to him, the only difference to this story is, he was in the high towers. But still wanted to own all of them. Hence, evil because, because nature is always to have more, even if we have no rights to it.

    • @paulh1194
      @paulh1194 2 місяці тому +2

      @@TheCriticalPolitician What we have now, is far beyond the original purpose for the earth, the animals and humans. The bible talks about a paradise earth, that was lost and will be restored. Animals and humans living in peace. Isa 65:25 The wolf and the lamb will feed together,
      The lion will eat straw just like the bull..... humans rule the earth now, its our inebility to create a peaceful environment for humans and animals alike, that make this world such a bad place. But that will end soon. And to peace there will be no end (Isa 9:7).

  • @JoyDivision88
    @JoyDivision88 5 місяців тому +42

    Is it me or does Dawkins look a tad uncomfortable listening to this.

    • @bearlemley
      @bearlemley 5 місяців тому +10

      I’m sure it doesn’t make him uncomfortable, it makes him embarrassed

    • @dsferns4227
      @dsferns4227 5 місяців тому +2

      Yes. Atheism is not logical. Agnosticism is somewhat, but not

    • @kellysmyth2337
      @kellysmyth2337 5 місяців тому +24

      @@JoyDivision88 He’s uncomfortable because he can’t believe the bullshit

    • @JoyDivision88
      @JoyDivision88 5 місяців тому +2

      @@kellysmyth2337 What an educated response. You obviously are far more intelligent that I am and I bow down to your superior intellect as I am just a stupid Christian.

    • @JoyDivision88
      @JoyDivision88 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Buckets1000 Wow hundreds of years of the greatest minds the world has known debating the existence of God, yet you have it sorted just like that. Amazing.

  • @rwongusa
    @rwongusa 5 місяців тому +15

    To destroy atheism is to prove god exists. This person presented nothing that show god is real. All he did was read excerpts from the bible.

    • @ChrisJones-hs6nj
      @ChrisJones-hs6nj 3 місяці тому +2

      You want evidence and yet you falsify the fact that all he did was quote the bible. He didn't quote it once!! Please, tell me more about this 'proof' that you speak of :/

    • @Jon-l2k8o
      @Jon-l2k8o 3 місяці тому +2

      I can prove God exists..
      The painting is proof of the painter
      The building is proof of the builder
      Creation is proof of the Creator
      Romans 1:19-20 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead so that they are without excuse.
      God gave us a conscience and that means (with knowledge) we know right and wrong as God put His laws in our hearts,
      We know its wrong to lie, cheat and steal but we do it anyway and after we die God will judge us by His law the 10 commandments which we can't escape because as I said God has written these laws in our hearts,
      Thou shalt not lie
      Thou shalt not steal
      Thou shalt not commit adultery
      Thou shalt not kill
      Thou shalt not covet
      Thats just 5 of them but how many times have you broken each commandment? Jesus said if you look with lust you commit adultery in your heart! the bible also says that to hate your brother makes you a murderer, everyone will have to give an account of themselves in the day of judgment, after you die you are judged and if you die in your sins you will go to hell forever but God dosent want to give you justice rather He wants to forgive you but God is a righteous judge and he will by no means look past your sins, so someone must pay for them, well 2000 years ago God was manifest in the flesh as Jesus Christ the Son of God and he died on the cross for our sins and was buried and rose again the third day and He is alive right now and will be forever, and if you put your faith in what He did, God will forgive you of all your sins and give you the Holy Spirit which will clean up your life, you will have supernatural power over sin.
      We broke Gods law and Jesus Christ paid our fine on the cross, the last 3 words Jesus said were, IT IS FINISHED, which means the debt is paid in full!! AMAZING! we don't have to pay for our sins!! we don't have to go to hell, hell wasn't
      created for man but for the devil and his angels but if we follow Satan we go where he is going.
      Buy a King James bible and read it, start in the new testament and God will reveal Himself to you as he has revealed Himself to me, most people will reject salvation because men love darkness rather than light and that is why many people can't find God, they don't want God they want to keep their sin and they are deceived not realising that God has something much better for you.

    • @Morgan-r8g
      @Morgan-r8g 3 місяці тому

      @@Jon-l2k8o you proved nothing other than you are gullible and have an invisible support system that is more about making money.

    • @Jon-l2k8o
      @Jon-l2k8o 3 місяці тому

      @@Morgan-r8g I once thought that people who believed in God were stupid, that was until I almost died, or I was dying slowly with heart failure and I started having what i thought was sleep apnea, night after night I kept on waking up realising that I wasn't breathing, long story short, I woke up and at the foot of my bed standing at the door was an 8 foot devil or demon and this thing would have killed me, if I hadn't known who Jesus is, Jesus said in Luke 10, I give you power over all the enemy and nothing shall by any means harm you, I have the Holy Spirit in me and this massive demon couldn't take my life because of how powerful the Lord Jesus is, after that happened I remember thinking to myself about how this big demon would terrify anyone and yet this thing is afraid of the Lord Jesus and mankind isn't!, people use Jesus name in vain which is very foolish to say the least as only He can save our souls from hell, which is a real place, I pray God will allow you to see a big demon and when you see and are terrified call upon the name of the Lord Jesus and He will save you!

    • @LucasPatutas
      @LucasPatutas 2 місяці тому

      ​Then from where did the Big bang come from?

  • @RichieRichMD
    @RichieRichMD 20 днів тому

    “I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.” -Richard Dawkins

    • @grruuuuuuuuuu
      @grruuuuuuuuuu 20 днів тому

      Did Mr. Dawkins ended up understanding the world thanks to his anti religious views? In its entirety? Or any other human mind that ever lived? Is that humanly possible? I don't think so. At least a religious life might led you to a meaningful experience in all the many aspects of life that are out there for us to understand. I always sense a lack of humility in many of such grand statements in favour of atheism.

  • @gingebrien2408
    @gingebrien2408 5 місяців тому +16

    I was hoping he would show me how mathematically it is improbable that our world came out of nothing but demands in a greater power.

    • @mariafewster4127
      @mariafewster4127 5 місяців тому +1

      If you watch the movie. "God's not dead" it's a great explainer.

    • @malakai0076
      @malakai0076 5 місяців тому +3

      @@gingebrien2408 Someone once calculated ( need to dig this up ) that for ALL the millions of ‘things’ that had to align to create life, from the temporal positions of the earth to the perfect distance of the earth from the sun, the probability of all these aligning is, as you understand, incredibly small. So small that from the mathematical perspective, it’s ZERO.

    • @albertlevert2988
      @albertlevert2988 5 місяців тому +1

      @@malakai0076if God chose such a complex way of creating us, going through the pain of creating many galaxies, and within each many planetary systems, and within one of them, the perfect conditions for life to emerge, but then needing a few billion years to reach the creation of mankind, and having this mankind being such a group of fools never respecting what god wants, then God was at least very incompetent, or simply just foolish. If he was omnipotent why create such a mess ? And then why let humans risk destroying themselves ?

    • @malakai0076
      @malakai0076 5 місяців тому

      @@albertlevert2988 Yes have had such questions by so many. If you are genuinely ready to listen then I will do my best to explain. First of all God created time. To God time is but a line. God is at the beginning of time as well as at the end of time. He is above time. So the billions of years to God is not even a millisecond. Many in mankind are fools that have refused to believe in the One who created them. But many have and do. There is no mess. There are issues but those issues are caused by mankind. If God wanted to intervene He can and sometimes He has. However He has let mankind deal with the issue by themselves hopefully thru His laws ( that are defined to. avoid the mess ). Whether we do or we dont, He will judge not now but on the Day of Judgement which he has warned mankind of. Now my close friend Hans says "If God wanted to he could have easily feed those dying in Africa" and the likes. OK lets follow this line. So God intervenes to help the starving Africans. Wow,wait. If God can help them, God can also help me find a good job rather than sweeping the floor. God finds me a good job. Wow, if God can help me find a good job, God can also make me win the lottery. ......it will go on until there is NO REASON for God to have created us in the first place. in the Quran Allah (SWT) says "We created man and jinns to worship Him"(Q) while in another place it says "And Allah is not in need of ANY of His creation...He is free of all needs"(Q). Hope this make some sense. I am scientist and I also believe in God. Just take DNA....how complex it is....the blue print of life. No software, not even AI based models can come anywhere near the complexity of DNA.

    • @PieterAdriaanvanderWalt
      @PieterAdriaanvanderWalt 5 місяців тому +2

      @@albertlevert2988 A Creator of universes and realities, incompetent. Wow. Okay.

  • @tracymorison7225
    @tracymorison7225 2 місяці тому +5

    It’s strange to me to use rationality as the basis for a defence of faith. In actual fact Lennox’s argument is “common sensism”; the type we so easily accept if we don’t interrogate it further. Essentially his argument is there must be an agentic designer/supreme being; we can only say x made y, not y made y. But this begs the question, where did x come from? Are we not then back at the proposal of x made x, or x always was (faith), which is hardly rational at all-the basis of his argument. I’m not necessarily defending empiricism, that physical, observable evidence (atoms, molecules) trumps all. However, since Lennox claims rationality as the basis of his position, if we apply Occam’s Razor I would say the explanation of physics requires far less mental gymnastics than the theological one. Moreover, if we were to accept the theist position, there is a god. Which one is he? Is he a he? Anything we claim to know about said god is purely speculative, as evidenced by the plethora of religions humanity has invented over time. What is known of god/s, is entirely fabricated by humans-there is no evidence for any divine revelation inspiring scripture or teachings. There simply is no rationality to it.
    I assume Lennox is defending the Judeo-Christian god of his culture (had he been born elsewhere he would be referring to Allah or Krishna) and follows the tenets of the Christian Bible (the cannon agreed by a select few). He would do well to acknowledge that he has faith simply because he prefers this explanation to the scientific one. To defend it as truth, and try persuade others of this, is nonsensical.

  • @psy237
    @psy237 3 місяці тому +7

    where exactly does he DESTROY it???

  • @gandysweet4288
    @gandysweet4288 2 дні тому

    I love Dr Lennox! ❤❤

  • @williambrown9785
    @williambrown9785 5 місяців тому +5

    We approve this message.

  • @matmersel2428
    @matmersel2428 Місяць тому +7

    As an agnostic I wonder who or what created God.

    • @greenbird679
      @greenbird679 Місяць тому +1

      But God is uncreated eternal being.

    • @WhitneyR.
      @WhitneyR. Місяць тому

      God exists eternally. An everlasting God who has no beginning and no end.

    • @MichaelShamamian
      @MichaelShamamian Місяць тому +2

      People.

    • @milansvancara
      @milansvancara Місяць тому

      Yeah, Christians just pretend these questions don't exist and desperately invent words and concepts making them not ask the obvious question.
      In other words
      "nothing can't exist without explanation but when it comes to my God, let's ignore it..."
      "everything has to have a beginning but when it comes to my God, let's ignore it..."
      That's as intelectualy dishonest stance as it can get.
      They can as well say the universe is eternal or sth and skip the incredibly unnecessary complicated middle man that creates extra issues rather than helpes

    • @stevouk
      @stevouk Місяць тому +2

      I prefer the term "Placeholder X" to "God", as "God" is weighed down with all sorts of dogma from all sorts of sources. Lennox is performing a bit of a cape-dance here. He is making some arguments for why something brought the universe into being. But he offers nothing by way of an explanation as to what that might be - as of course he can't, since nobody was around at the time. What he does by all sorts of sashaying around the argument, is to insert "God" as a given. The rickety rope-bridge from *his* conception of God (of c. vintage 2,000 years ago in Galilee) to the Placeholder he argues for, isn't one he even begins to want to cross here, and I don't blame him.

  • @jonnsmith180
    @jonnsmith180 3 місяці тому +15

    Where is the destruction? And the fact that he is a mathematician and doesn't understand the difference between probability and possibility is embarrassing. How to destroy a god believer? Simple. Ask for proof. Because in this world those making the claim are beholden to prove it. Its called the scientific method for a reason.

    • @lukeheffernan854
      @lukeheffernan854 3 місяці тому +3

      Logic alone proves the need for a Creator. Its an infinite regression to say created things were created by other created things.. there must be an uncreated Creator. (Which we call God)

    • @HameedRudd
      @HameedRudd 3 місяці тому

      His belief does not make sense for anyone part of himself absolutely bulshit he has been fed by bourgeoisie

    • @valdeeracruso1734
      @valdeeracruso1734 3 місяці тому

      @@lukeheffernan854 An uncreated Creator is the 'Source' which has been termed as intelliggent energy, which is similar to A.I. so, can that be the same thing?

    • @lukeheffernan854
      @lukeheffernan854 3 місяці тому +3

      Well, I dont think so, since an AI cannot bring something into existence out of nothing. The most powerful stars cannot destroy or create energy, only convert it. AI also has a concrete history of being developed by human beings out of created materials. It did not always exist, and it can one day not exist, unlike the Lord our Creator, who must be eternal.

    • @mutsuhanma7807
      @mutsuhanma7807 3 місяці тому

      she didnt say A.I?

  • @jamiegustkey2573
    @jamiegustkey2573 17 днів тому

    I wish Alistair Begg could've spoke at this. His delivery and reasoning is very even... Draws you in. And to me, he encapsulates his listeners being well spoken and well versed... As God puts His Words in Alistair's mouth. Thank you for sharing this...
    ❤️

  • @glynarchie5765
    @glynarchie5765 5 місяців тому +10

    As with other comments, you can't destroy athiesm , any more than you can destroy a lack of belief leprechauns exist.

    • @markaplier1261
      @markaplier1261 5 днів тому

      Salient point. At what point should we just start making jokes at these zealots...arguimg is a waste of time hahahaha.

  • @ekchulbuli
    @ekchulbuli 3 місяці тому +5

    Know the truth and the truth will set you free

    • @homosapien5623
      @homosapien5623 6 днів тому

      free from the shackles of christianity or any other religion?

  • @sharonmatomane6297
    @sharonmatomane6297 2 місяці тому +4

    God bless his word in Jesus name Amen🙏

  • @user-zw2ns2ph1p
    @user-zw2ns2ph1p 13 днів тому +1

    God is being..not a being. A being is limited and finite....being is beyond.

  • @nikosnikos3624
    @nikosnikos3624 Місяць тому +3

    I am from Greece, the homeland of Culture and Sciences. So I have this to contribute, Civilization and Sciences developed in Greece when the ancient Greek philosophers and other scientists got rid of metaphysical concerns and endless discussions about God and I honestly don't believe they were wrong...

    • @Giorgos-n4i
      @Giorgos-n4i Місяць тому +1

      Science is the study of the nature and the universe, including everything inside of it and the laws that form it. Physics, mathematics, astronomy, biology, and all the other sciences involve around studying these things. Things that were created by God and formed under the wisdom of God.
      (I'm from Greece too)

  • @Marty_AU
    @Marty_AU Місяць тому +17

    He doesn’t destroy atheism at all. If he did, he would have found good reason why God is rational and atheism is not.

    • @doyouknoedawae
      @doyouknoedawae Місяць тому +7

      Because without God there is no basis for ANY of the following:
      1: Self Value
      2: Morality
      3: Love
      4:Consciousness
      5: Rationality.
      And that's 5 of many. Too flawed on a philosophical level, and this is why Theism is more logical. Because then we have someone who is able to define the rules because he KNOWS what is good. Not what he THINKS or OPINIONATES to be good. Because while majority would opinionate that Murder is wrong, if it changed the other way, there would be no basis to say they WERE wrong. Just useless opinions used for useless things in an existential existence. Which is why I am convinced, there is a god. It's up to you to decide who it is, and a good place to start is the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. And read each chapter twice, understand what you're reading and make a logical choice based off that. Have a blessed day!

    • @doyouknoedawae
      @doyouknoedawae Місяць тому +2

      I would explain the others but I will give others a maximum of 2 weeks to respond with their explanations for the Self value, love, and consciousness part. I already did Morality and Rationality.

    • @vcracing
      @vcracing Місяць тому +4

      He did explain why atheism is not rational

    • @unpopularopinions9076
      @unpopularopinions9076 Місяць тому

      Did you listen at all?

    • @Savagemode473
      @Savagemode473 Місяць тому

      @@vcracinghow exactly. He only asserted that atheism is irrational. He did not prove it.

  • @ritchiedockery3147
    @ritchiedockery3147 4 місяці тому +7

    Nothing from Nothing leaves Nothing.
    Something from Something leads to Everthing!

    • @jjevans1693
      @jjevans1693 4 місяці тому +1

      Who says everything was created from nothing? lol

    • @billyjoejimbob75
      @billyjoejimbob75 4 місяці тому

      That sounds like "An answer that answers everything answers nothing."

    • @davep3014
      @davep3014 4 місяці тому

      ​@@jjevans1693where did everything come from? Wanna do quantum physics?

    • @jjevans1693
      @jjevans1693 4 місяці тому +1

      @@davep3014 Nobody knows exactly how everything came into being. That's the point. I would rather not pretend to know things that humanity simply doesn't yet know.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 4 місяці тому

      And nothing from something is still that something
      and something from nothing is negative something ...

  • @Idkwhatsupwithyou
    @Idkwhatsupwithyou 15 днів тому +1

    Maybe one day he’ll be able to prove a god exists

  • @cruachankeith
    @cruachankeith 20 днів тому +14

    Lad from Dublin destroys oxford Christian mathematician in two words - PROVE IT

    • @stephencunliffe3879
      @stephencunliffe3879 19 днів тому +3

      Three words. You Prove it.

    • @cruachankeith
      @cruachankeith 19 днів тому

      @ * presents open hands with no visible god in hands * there!

    • @dany_fg
      @dany_fg 18 днів тому +6

      @@stephencunliffe3879 well, atheism does not in fact propose anything so we have nothing to prove, as atheism is just a *lack of belief* in a god.
      you on the other hand have everything to prove, because if theism is true atheists will accept that a god exists but if there is no god I can almost guarantee that almost no theist will stop believing.

    • @eugenepashin
      @eugenepashin 17 днів тому +2

      @@dany_fg There is more to it. In existing thousand of gods to beleive, an atheist beleives in just one god less than a christian.

  • @kevinod771
    @kevinod771 4 місяці тому +25

    And if horses had a god he’d look like a horse! Bertrand Russell

    • @lukeheffernan854
      @lukeheffernan854 3 місяці тому +1

      Funny how the Christian God is an all powerful, uncreated Being, Being itself- the source of all existence, infinitely Good, True, and Beautiful… kind of different than a human no?

    • @bernardjoyce1288
      @bernardjoyce1288 3 місяці тому

      Maybe he/her does

    • @stephenmitchell6368
      @stephenmitchell6368 3 місяці тому

      Mr. Russell may think differently now.

    • @LucasPatutas
      @LucasPatutas 2 місяці тому

      But God doesnt have a definite shape. Thats the thing, you all think God looks like a human, but God has no shape, and you cant Accept that

    • @fazerianducati
      @fazerianducati 29 днів тому

      @@LucasPatutasHow do you know this?

  • @linuxpython935
    @linuxpython935 4 місяці тому +10

    Conflating atheism with materialism is in my opinion so short-sighted that it beggars belief. 🤦‍♂

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 4 місяці тому

      Well, we can be sure that it is correct, because look at how poor the Catholic church is, as just one example. ;-/ All religions adhere to their own tenets, don'tcha know, in this case, "Gather not up for yourselves, treasures on Earth". The hypocrisy is stifling.

  • @TTPDrums
    @TTPDrums 26 днів тому

    Here’s one for the believers.
    I often grapple with the question “if God exists, why does he sit by and allow human suffering” to which I’m usually answered something like “God created man in his image and gave us free will and self determination without interference” etc to which I reply, if God cannot or will not intervene with human suffering, why bother to pray?

    • @iamthefirstlady
      @iamthefirstlady 25 днів тому

      God intervenes in the suffering of human. He mentioned that if God wasn't interested then he wouldn't have descended in the form of Jesus to die on the cross for humans. They are so much suffering in the world because people choose to live a life different from what God is offering. Suffering became a part of human because we chose to disobey God. Becoming a Christian doesn't mean Suffering ends but it offers hope that we're not alone in our sufferings and that there's help only if we're willing to ask for it and also like he said in the video, there is a greater justice at the end of it all.

    • @TTPDrums
      @TTPDrums 25 днів тому +1

      @ ok. Doesn’t really account for leukaemia in children, birth defects, chronic illness, blindness, mental incapacity, cleft pallet, child abuse, mental illness, death in pregnancy… etc etc.

    • @iamthefirstlady
      @iamthefirstlady 25 днів тому +1

      @@TTPDrums Well sorry If I couldn't answer your questions well enough. Really do hope you do end up having them answered but the truth will always remain that God soo loved the World that He gave his only begotten son that whosoever Believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life. I wish all the best in this life and the next. God loves you and God bless you.

    • @TTPDrums
      @TTPDrums 25 днів тому +1

      @ all the best to you also.
      I don’t think I’ll ever understand how so much suffering is tolerated on this planet and how God doesn’t help those who really need it.
      For what it’s worth, I believe we’re responsible for everything that happens to us and others. All we can do is to be kind, patient and tolerant to the best of our abilities, whilst accepting that we’re not perfect and we all get things wrong now and then. Strive to be a better version of ourselves everyday. X

  • @tallbillbassman
    @tallbillbassman 4 місяці тому +13

    All he proves is that there are certain kinds of nonsense which are compatible with their own nonsensical consequences.

    • @Trucking4Jesus
      @Trucking4Jesus 4 місяці тому +5

      wow what a nice and scientific rebuttal you made there, very philosophical, teach me more!

  • @maxrobespierre9176
    @maxrobespierre9176 5 місяців тому +6

    There is no known way to logically and rationally arrive at a conclusion in support ANY specific religion. The best that can come close to supporting the existence of god, could only support deist position. In other words, a power that created the universe but does not care to engage with human supplicants.

    • @elsabezeeman6619
      @elsabezeeman6619 5 місяців тому

      The Christian God loves us so much that He came to live with us and even became physically part of human suffering.

    • @wilhelmvonn9619
      @wilhelmvonn9619 5 місяців тому

      Some kind of god may have created the universe - it would explain why there is "something rather than nothing" - but beyond that I don't think we can be sure of anything. People have sincerely believed in thousands of different gods.

    • @maxrobespierre9176
      @maxrobespierre9176 5 місяців тому +1

      @@elsabezeeman6619 And the Muslim god?

    • @elsabezeeman6619
      @elsabezeeman6619 5 місяців тому

      I have great respect for Muslims, but as far as I can gather, Allah is not renowned for his love.
      The Christian God came to live on earth in a human body. He was at times hungry, cold, didn't have a place to sleep, was humiliated, despised and eventually killed in a most brutal way - all because of his love for us; so that we, if we put our trust in Him, will receive everlasting life and ultimate justice. He even made it possible to have a relationship with Him, while still in this life on earth. I am not aware of any other religion that offers this.

    • @GitauSimon
      @GitauSimon 5 місяців тому

      @@elsabezeeman6619 Read the Bible for what it is. God in the Bible sets up the conditions for man to sin, curses the entire world because of a mistake (mind you Adam had not eaten from the tree of knowledge of good and evil)
      Sacrifices Himself to Himself as a solution. Salvation for mankind
      But He doesn't really die because Jesus rose from the dead after 3 days (the point of a sacrifice is actual loss. Thanos and Gamora kind of thing. What does God lose if Jesus rose from the dead? How is that a sacrifice? )
      Salvation is offered on conditions of Hell which im sure is what keeps most people in their faith. Doesn't sound like a loving God to me rather it sounds like the stories of a group of people coming up. A local myth for a local people
      Saying that the God in the bible loves you is like congratulating a firefighter for putting out a fire that they started
      Not to forget all the people in other religions who according to your faith are damned to Hell because they don't believe the 'Right' God
      I'm not tryin to hate. These things just speak for themselves

  • @GaryEdwardswiz
    @GaryEdwardswiz 5 місяців тому +11

    Our Words From Jesus were LOVE that Cures all Only The Christian religion Teaches Love All

    • @marvinc9994
      @marvinc9994 5 місяців тому

      Contrast with Islam - which teaches permanent _jihad_ against ALL Unbelievers - until the WHOLE world has been conquered, at which point 'peace' will reign - under the 'Religion of Peace' (an expression whose significance silly people simply fail to understand!).

    • @maxxmabemwe4859
      @maxxmabemwe4859 5 місяців тому

      Christ is a title, not a surname. Yeshua was claimed to be the Christ by his followers. None of his apostles had surnames, Peter, Luke, Mathew, Mark, Thomas, etc.

    • @icesculpting4you
      @icesculpting4you 4 місяці тому

      Delusional

    • @marvinc9994
      @marvinc9994 4 місяці тому

      @@icesculpting4you
      "Delusional"
      So you BELIEVE (or hope)! But you don't actually KNOW, do you - as a psychiatrist would, when faced with a _genuinely_ delusional subject? And to be frank, your single-word response hardly contributes to what _should_ be a rather interesting debate, does it? So - why did you even bother?

  • @enma0926
    @enma0926 8 днів тому

    "It is absurd to complain that it is unthinkable for an unthinkable god to make everything out of nothing and then to pretend that it is more thinkable that nothing should turn itself into everything" - G.K. Chesterton

    • @homosapien5623
      @homosapien5623 6 днів тому

      If you tried to explain TikTok or Lasik eye surgery to someone from 500 years ago, would they not call you absurd? It also used to be more thinkable that the universe revolved around the Earth too at one point in time. There is still so much to discover, and maybe we will never be able to discover it all. Despite how modern our world seems, we are still very much in our infancy in understanding the universe, so I think it's more absurd to think of any religion as the truth simply because we don't have the answers yet.

  • @rickwyant
    @rickwyant 5 місяців тому +9

    Belief isn't knowing.

    • @Moonlord8941
      @Moonlord8941 5 місяців тому

      "know"
      1 John 2:13
      King James Version
      13 I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one. I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father.
      John 10:27-28
      King James Version
      27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
      28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
      The ironic thing is, is that atheism is an absence of belief in deity and claim you can't know when it states you can know not only in the bible but on the entire historical fact of Christ's life, death and resurrection held as evidence by the empty tomb (and even the propaganda the Jew's created during the time trying to say the followers of Jesus stole his body)
      "where's the evidence?"
      The evidence is there and has been there. its historical fact, people just don't believe in it for their own reasons.
      As this man eluded to, the evidence of a creator is creation itself. the problem isn't a lack of evidence, its the evil and blindness of people themselves and even if you do receive a sign you "believe" it wise to approach everything with extreme skepticism until you can produce an environment to control it in order to understand it inside and out.
      Matthew 16:4
      King James Version
      4 A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
      Romans 1:28-32
      King James Version
      28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
      29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
      30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
      31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
      32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
      The Holy Word of God ask you to test it yourself.
      1 Thessalonians 5:21
      King James Version
      21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
      As a Christian we do not simply "believe" in God. we know him and get to know him more intimately through the Holy spirit and Prayer. Faith is not a blind belief in the existence of God, it is the belief God will keep his promises he made toward us.
      People love John 3:16 as i do, but the verses after help illuminate why people don't or cannot come to belief in God because it causes severe cognitive dissonance and demands a change that must happen in their lives (being born again) which can only be accomplished by what Jesus did on the Cross and it is evidence in and of itself because you can experience it. it is personalized and is a personal relationship waiting for everyone who enters into "belief"
      John 3:16-21
      King james version
      16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
      17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
      18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
      19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
      20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
      21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
      Atheism demands proof and evidence that is so clearly there and in front of them they cannot see it... why? GOD tells them why
      2 Corinthians 4:4
      King James Version
      4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
      Yes, Paul wrote 2 Corinthians not God physically but let the bible explain
      2 Peter 1:21
      King James Version
      21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
      The Atheist trys to understand everything with a carnal mind
      1 Corinthians 2:14
      King James Version
      14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
      Romans 8:6-8
      King James Version
      6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
      7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
      8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
      Atheism is untenable. in a way, especially after becoming a believer myself seems closer and closer to a form of insanity.
      For someone who knows Christ, who has the Holy spirit who dwells within them and has a personal relationship with the Father through Jesus. There is no argument nor debate here. It is a struggle to pull people out of deep water, to rescue them from the fire. To point them to the only person who can not only save you from all the horrible things you've done and the just punishment you will receive for it but also explain to you why the cake was made in the first place and your own role and meaning in everything.
      if you want to know God. Do not seek any man, idea or philosophy because
      Colossians 2:8
      King James Version
      8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
      But instead
      1. Repent
      2. Confess
      3. Ask for forgiveness, and the Holy spirit
      Matthew 7:7-8
      King James Version
      7 Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:
      8 For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.
      and 4. listen and obey the Holy spirit as he guides you into all truth
      John 16:13
      King James Version
      13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
      Atheism seeks truth but will never obtain it because they refuse to go to the "person who made the cake" which is frankly quite apt because considering timothy described unbelievers as
      2 Timothy 3:7
      King James Version
      7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
      Please. read the book for yourself intentionally, purposefully. Take everything you think you know and sieve it through the Bible.
      Nothing would bring me more joy than to see more souls added to the Kingdom and to have more experience the love of the creator who laid it all out for us but i know deep in my heart that "few there be that find it"
      Matthew 7:13-14
      King James Version
      13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
      14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
      i hope that your unbelief will turn into belief and your belief into knowing and all the perceived "contradictions" of the bible are illuminated and
      John 8:32
      King James Version
      32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
      With all humbleness and love.

    • @bobbygene8274
      @bobbygene8274 5 місяців тому +1

      Nor is knowledge the same as knowing-experience "proves" knowledge. But without faith there is nothing. To have faith is to believe in that which you do not know.

    • @sg-fr6pf
      @sg-fr6pf 4 місяці тому

      This is certainly true. Why then does one turn to the other extreme, namely atheism, i.e. the "knowledge" that there is no God? Agnosticism is the only reasonable position. That this is still a debate in 2024 is mind-boggling beyond words. I don't think theists have properly thought of what would constitute _definitive_ proof of the absence of God, nor have atheists considered what would _definitively_ proof His existence. Hence we have been mired in these dualistic ego games for millenia, and will be for quite some time yet.

  • @joegagnon2268
    @joegagnon2268 2 місяці тому +4

    4:23 he’s turning red he’s trying not to cry the conflict in him

    • @christyr873
      @christyr873 17 днів тому

      Or because he is talking very loudly without a microphone it is causing him to turn a little pink.

  • @cjen1959
    @cjen1959 5 місяців тому +11

    For us simpler minded folks I look at something like love. Evolution without God needs attraction to maintain the species but what purpose does love have in such a system? I believe our need to connect with one another is because we all come from the same Divine Family where we were all joined and we long to be reconnected to our brothers and sisters.

    • @k7jeb
      @k7jeb 5 місяців тому +1

      I'll posit an answer: Love binds mating pairs of humans to each other and to their offspring. Love binds those families to the tribe. Love binds those tribes to human society. And human society is an extremely potent force for survival.

    • @cjen1959
      @cjen1959 5 місяців тому

      @@k7jeb I agree. So is that an argument for or against the existence of God? If it’s an argument against then I would counter with why does love have to exist at that level when simple attraction allows the species to continue along with packs, flocks or whatever that solve for the community? IMO love goes way beyond the “need” for simple existence that nature affords the rest of the animal world.

    • @k7jeb
      @k7jeb 5 місяців тому +1

      @@cjen1959 My point is that survival, either of the individual or of the species, is the final arbiter of existence. If "love", "faith in God" or brute physical strength enhances survival, then those attributes will propagate into the future with the surviving individuals. For humans, the big survival attribute is a complex, highly flexible social organization that effectively counters existential threats. Whatever the mental or physical constructs used for that social organization are, they become a part of the individuals who survive and reproduce.

    • @Steve52344
      @Steve52344 5 місяців тому

      What "Devine Family"? FACT: We all came from our ancestors -- from prehistoric humans who came from ape-men who came from apes, etc. etc. And that's not a BELIEF...nor is it "DEVINE." Animals also long for their own kind.

    • @cjen1959
      @cjen1959 5 місяців тому

      @@Steve52344 I’m referring to the soul not the flesh.

  • @kfl2308
    @kfl2308 21 день тому

    He really didn't destroy anything nor he proved anything/gave solid reasons to believe in God.

  • @EX-vf6vp
    @EX-vf6vp 3 місяці тому +7

    Good talk but he forgets 4000 other religions

    • @winstoncoerecius
      @winstoncoerecius 2 місяці тому

      Let those religions produce their evidence

    • @paulh1194
      @paulh1194 2 місяці тому

      “One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism” “One Lord [there is], one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all persons, who is over all.”-EPHESIANS 4:4-6 this is quite clear to me, there is but 1 religion, all the rest belong to the wicked one 2 Cor 4:3,4

    • @peteherrera1502
      @peteherrera1502 Місяць тому +1

      The other religions cannot save you.
      whereas Jesus Christ, who is the Son of God is only one way by which mankind can be saved and that is through Jesus Christ our Lord. who set aside his divinity and was created like us in everyway. Heb 2:14-18. Suffered more than we can imagine, died once for all and is risen from the grave. Who as the Son of God created the heavens and the earth and all that is in them out of nothingness.

    • @paulh1194
      @paulh1194 Місяць тому

      @@peteherrera1502 I agree with you about the Christ as the means to save mankind. But it was his heavenly father than sent him to rescue us. You mentioned other religions can't be saved, well, unless they turn to the true source of life. But most religions that believe in Jesus, don't worship the true God also ( a must for life ) as they don't even acknowledge his hebrew name YHWH הוה Ps 99:6/Ps83:18

  • @user-oy9zy4ds9m
    @user-oy9zy4ds9m 5 місяців тому +7

    Even when I was a borderline atheist , I still believed that God could exist and who’s origin could be explained so easily to even a hardcore atheist scientist; x amounts of time ago, virtually infinite to us, a super advanced civilization could have invented some form of super computer or AI that overtime became infinitely powerful , so powerful it was able to create universes , totally self aware, create heaven and earth, etc. so powerful we couldn’t even begin to comprehend its power . See even a hardcore atheist should be able to believe that’s a possibility

    • @paulb2760
      @paulb2760 5 місяців тому +2

      As a hard core scientist, I absolutely agree that this could be true. I’m pretty sure that conflicts with most believer’s concept of a supernatural god. I don’t think they have more advanced science in mind.

    • @mysticjen379
      @mysticjen379 5 місяців тому

      @@paulb2760Oh we do 🙂 Possibly more than atheists.

    • @user-oy9zy4ds9m
      @user-oy9zy4ds9m 5 місяців тому

      @@paulb2760 the thing is, the entity could be so powerful that it could indeed have become ‘supernatural’. At what point does something become so inconceivably powerful that it bridges the gap that we think of as science vs supernatural

    • @user-oy9zy4ds9m
      @user-oy9zy4ds9m 5 місяців тому +1

      @@paulb2760 my other personal theory , although I’m sure someone much smarter than me has said it before, but I don’t think I’ve ever read about it anywhere or heard about it but maybe…. Anyway it’s that if the universe is truly infinite, to my mind, that would mean EVERYTHING is real, including God, heaven , hell etc because in a truly infinite universe/multiverse everything has infinite chances of becoming real which means with infinite amount of time it would inevitably become real an infinite amount of times. If this makes sense…. I’m having trouble articulating my point

    • @geeeee8268
      @geeeee8268 5 місяців тому

      So what you saying is that god is an "antient and advanced" civilization. Who created an AI? Well, so is there god for that cavitation? Or it just came to be? An effect without cause. So no matter how far you will try to remove the "creation" event, it still does not explain why "existence" develops from simple to complicated. And if complicated somehow existed before the simple... well, it loses the whole sense isn't it?

  • @DnSchel
    @DnSchel 3 місяці тому +4

    What people are missing is not being aware Richard Dawkins was in the audience, what people are missing is him getting two minutes of mic time to "destroy" the mathematician's points, and religion in general.

    • @jamesmullaney8311
      @jamesmullaney8311 3 місяці тому

      Dawkins is great evolutionist/science but he isn't a philosopher and while you can claim all day that prime matter exists it doesn't - so there isn't anything you can do to undermine the Big Bang theory

  • @josueaguirre9785
    @josueaguirre9785 17 днів тому

    I like very much how he explains his views