This is why umpires should not step in unless he is absolutely certain. He got 2 overrules wrong in one match. One shot from Monfils and one shot from Federer
"Federer was Losing..." What? At no point was Federer ever losing in this match. He won the first set 6-4. Bro, you have good videos but you gotta stop with the overly dramatic click-bait titles.
Technically while the incident was happening he was losing the match; 1 set all, 3 games all, 0-15. Only after he challenged and 'got angry' it went 15-0.
he was losing at the beginning of the 1st set. and they were 100% tied at the point of "controversy", in fact if the challenge had failed Fed would have been losing again. Also if Monfils had been allowed HIS challenge Fed likely would have lost the first set too. Maybe a bit of clickbait, but hardly worth complaining about.
You forget the popcorn when you watch a match as fast paced as this. Kudos to Gael who showed his intent to best Roger into submission. For once he chose to put his flamboyance in his pocket & focused on his game. But the guy across the net is not called the maestro for nothing. You need more than just your A game. Great match to feature. As always you never disappoint. Now if only we gave the popcorn to Carlos.
Yeah, Monfils just decided to hope it was out, and it wasn't... the line call happened when the ball was already well behind him. Quite embarassing for him to pretend that the point should've been replayed.
July ‘24, This match is still v much fun and exciting. Back then.. there’s so many talented players, Tennis is fun to watch, entertaining and inspiring. Thank you for the re-upload.
Just a side note. As someone who only knows one language, I applaud you on how well you speak it. I have no idea how long you've been speaking English but your accent (while thick) is very understandable. That is not an easy thing to do. So bravo mate. One day I will learn Spanish, but today is not that day. I have other studies currently.
Wow, thank you! I learnt the language through watching English speaking UA-camrs when I was a kid haha. Wanna learn Spanish too but been delaying it for years now. Good luck with your studies buddy ❤️
If his backhand was 2-handed, he would have beaten Djokovic as the goat of tennis. Undoubtedly, the 1-handed backhand was Fed's Achilles heel that Nadal and Djoker capitalized on.
Very good match, lots of incredible gets and clean winners. To be honest I can’t see how Gael was complaining that he left the ball because it was called out. The ball had hit the back wall before it got called. He wouldn’t have got to it. At that point you can see Gael play just that little bit more tentative and then you see Roger add a little more spice to his shots and that’s what the difference is. Gael was playing good but good won’t get it done against Roger, he had to keep Pressing even if it meant he would make more errors. You can only go for it for so long until you realize that the finish line is within sight and you take your foot slightly off the gas and Roger seized that moment and momentum was his. The way Roger glides around the court and the footwork before each shot is a thing of beauty. How good was the return in the second point shown in the video
Federer won the 1st set, he was never losing in this game. Yeah the umpire wasn’t the greatest and he didn’t make Federer super angry, maybe just a little frustrated. He argued for like 5 seconds and then hit a ball out of the stadium but that was it.
Have been a big Federer fan since the beginning of his career, but only lately have i started noticing how salty he got whenever he felt there was a genuine threat.
The challenged call on point 1 of the 7th game, of Set #3., was a right challenge, because it was found by Hawkeye, to be in. So why is Monfils even talking? he's like: After the match we will study the video at this point 3-3, and you will see. See what?, Hawkeye show that it was infact close to being out, but was, IN! Federer has a better eye from the other side of the court, than linesman standing 15 feet away from the line they are judging. smh
Fed is the greatest watch and shoe salesman. His tennis was sqaush and thank god nadal/dj0oki came along to save tennis from fedsqaush. Fed had no fight, weak backhand ,weak mental strength all he had was winning the populatiry contest that big corp sold to the armchair tennis crowd..His carrerr record agaisnt his 2 rivals was a failure ..He only won 33% of his GS matches and GS finlas against novak/nadal..He couldn't even beat nadal once at french and only 2 other times on clay. Djoki beat nadal 9 times on clay ,2 times at french and Just recently at Olympics on NAdal grounds again!! Fed won 15 slams in the goldilocks era 2003-2009 when sampras/aggassi were leaving ..after nadal/djoki/murray/wawrinka got going fed's sqaush game faded away and only won a handful of GS over the next 13 yrs!!
RF is under strain. I believe he may have a complaint with the umpire. he basically said that the umpire gave him no indication that the ball was close. having said that ...., i doubt that the umpires normally are responsible for that - though we might ask that of a good chair. RF is saying he should have looked over to him indicating the ball could be challenged. as far as Monfils - he did not challenge a call but later complained about it. that is a low-level person. have to call a spade a spade here ....
Why the stupid click-bait title? Not necessary - was a good match for both players - Monfils gave as good as he got and played many brilliant points against an on form Federer.
pretty classic .... Federers opponent is physically more gifter, but mentally less gifted. period. this guy could have won numerous points where he just kind of hit average returns at a crucial moment in the point.
we honestly cannot say RF is " less gifted . " we certainly can say as you say, that RF tends to grossly outperform his opponents mentally. without RF these guys at the top level are monsters of base-line technique. when RF is on he makes them - honestly - seem like lost children .
Sometimes I just got sick of Federer winning. WHy cant someone else win onc in awhile. Monfis should have won that one point and I think Fed knew it. WE all know Djokovic is the GOAT
WIVORN. your comments have nothing to do with the essence of sport. You are never close to reality. A disaster. Try one sport, any sport, if you only dare, and think it all over again. PLEASE,...
@@danbotez1307 maybe so but Nadal still has nothing to do with this video. We could say the same about Wawrinka or del Potro, so why does Nadal get special mention?
@@sabbialmighty7249 I beg to disagree. Neither Wawrinka nor del Potro have/had the exquisite ball-volleying skills of Nadal. Watching Monfils reminded me of how Nadal annihilated Fed's aggressive play. Then again, Nadal had the high-kicking forehand on Fed's backhand side which Fed couldn't handle, and which nobody was able to replicate. Monfils upset Fed in the indoor court final of one Paris Masters. Quite an achievement, given Fed's dominant indoor play, mainly fueled, as he was aging, by bomb serves.
@@danbotez1307 i will definitely agree that Nadal's ball striking was out of this world, and both Nadal and Fed had to be at their best to beat each other. My question still remains though, why bring Nadal up?
Well, Djokovic won half of his Slams when Federer and Nadal (and Murray) were all basically done. Still, Djokovic lost finals to guys like Wawrinka and Medvedev... Federer also won most of his Slams during a weak era (before Nadal, Djokovic and Murray). It's only Nadal who always had to compete with the best throughout his career.
@@marcusbrspok for you djokovic won 12 grandslams in a weak era from 2018-2023, but nadals 8 grandslams from 2017-2022 was in a strong era or also in a weak era? WHEN YOU SAYS weak era, then you should also put nadals 6 grandslam from 2008-2010 in a weak era categorie, because 2008 was even baby weak djokovic better then prime federer and won more big titles and was in the same rankinging points like federer in 2008 and weak djokovic was even in his worst season of his life 2010, from French open 2010 until us open 2010 better then federer.that shows how weak actually were the season 2008 and 2010. Sinner and alcaraz were 2023 better then federer and djokovic in 2008 and 2010. Even federer and nadal were from 2015-2022 better then djokovic and federer from 2008-10
This is why umpires should not step in unless he is absolutely certain. He got 2 overrules wrong in one match. One shot from Monfils and one shot from Federer
Easy to say, hard to do
And no code violations for racket abuse or ball abuse. One sided ref
"Federer was Losing..." What? At no point was Federer ever losing in this match. He won the first set 6-4. Bro, you have good videos but you gotta stop with the overly dramatic click-bait titles.
1:31 literally watching as he is technically losing and reading this
Technically while the incident was happening he was losing the match; 1 set all, 3 games all, 0-15. Only after he challenged and 'got angry' it went 15-0.
bad take
he was losing at the beginning of the 1st set. and they were 100% tied at the point of "controversy", in fact if the challenge had failed Fed would have been losing again. Also if Monfils had been allowed HIS challenge Fed likely would have lost the first set too. Maybe a bit of clickbait, but hardly worth complaining about.
Did you watch the video? He was losing at the beginning of the match.
You forget the popcorn when you watch a match as fast paced as this. Kudos to Gael who showed his intent to best Roger into submission. For once he chose to put his flamboyance in his pocket & focused on his game. But the guy across the net is not called the maestro for nothing. You need more than just your A game. Great match to feature. As always you never disappoint. Now if only we gave the popcorn to Carlos.
Wivo: "Federer was losing"
Reality: He was in fact, not.
I was waiting for him losing lol. Was like where which part of this match is he losing
Technically maybe at 10:48 you could say he was losing but he never went down a break. Title is misleading
Wivo: "the umpire made Federer SUPER ANGRY"
Reality: Federer spends 15 seconds calmly talking to the umpire
10:45 that volley is INSANEEE!!!!!!!! Those reflexes are truly like a mongoose on amphetamines.
thanks for posting roger videos :) i miss seeing him play
Glad you enjoy them buddy! Same here tho 🥹
Don't we all
Monfils did let the ball go, but before the linesman called it out. It is only fair the point was given to Roger then
Yeah, Monfils just decided to hope it was out, and it wasn't... the line call happened when the ball was already well behind him. Quite embarassing for him to pretend that the point should've been replayed.
no need for the clickbait you make good videos
The title is massive click bait. Most dramatic match ever? Definitely not. Not even top 20.
And when was Federer losing?
Federer is my all time favorite player, but I love Monfils!!
July ‘24, This match is still v much fun and exciting.
Back then.. there’s so many talented players, Tennis is fun to watch, entertaining and inspiring.
Thank you for the re-upload.
Just a side note.
As someone who only knows one language, I applaud you on how well you speak it. I have no idea how long you've been speaking English but your accent (while thick) is very understandable. That is not an easy thing to do. So bravo mate.
One day I will learn Spanish, but today is not that day. I have other studies currently.
Wow, thank you! I learnt the language through watching English speaking UA-camrs when I was a kid haha. Wanna learn Spanish too but been delaying it for years now.
Good luck with your studies buddy ❤️
We all miss that unforgettable backhand…
his backhand was bad ...
That was his weakness, dude...
If his backhand was 2-handed, he would have beaten Djokovic as the goat of tennis. Undoubtedly, the 1-handed backhand was Fed's Achilles heel that Nadal and Djoker capitalized on.
Misleading title. Neither was he losing nor the umpire made him angry. He was seemed angry and agitated from the second set
Very good match, lots of incredible gets and clean winners. To be honest I can’t see how Gael was complaining that he left the ball because it was called out. The ball had hit the back wall before it got called. He wouldn’t have got to it. At that point you can see Gael play just that little bit more tentative and then you see Roger add a little more spice to his shots and that’s what the difference is. Gael was playing good but good won’t get it done against Roger, he had to keep
Pressing even if it meant he would make more errors. You can only go for it for so long until you realize that the finish line is within sight and you take your foot slightly off the gas and Roger seized that moment and momentum was his. The way Roger glides around the court and the footwork before each shot is a thing of beauty. How good was the return in the second point shown in the video
Federer won the 1st set, he was never losing in this game. Yeah the umpire wasn’t the greatest and he didn’t make Federer super angry, maybe just a little frustrated. He argued for like 5 seconds and then hit a ball out of the stadium but that was it.
man, I sure miss Federer playing on the tour like this
It’s always nice to mention which tournament it was
It's literally in the first 30 seconds of the video
@@WivoRN okidoki, my bad
"Most Dramatic Match EVER" - gotta love youtube titles
Idk why UA-cam recommended me this video, but for sure, this match was pretty enjoyable.
Thanks for coming, bro ❤️
@WivoRN it's Federer, you don't need the clickbait title mate.
Good video, bad clickbait title
Federer...greatest shot maker the tennis world has ever seen and never make him angry, you'll pay for it.
please ! in what year and in what match ??
2014 Cincinnati masters
How was Federer loosing? It was 6:4 4:6 3:3 and 0:0. People will do anything for clicks in their videos. Ridiculous
& it's fvckin' annoyin'.
Did I miss the shocking part?
I Miss Fed
Good video thank you
Seems he was already angry and just needed some drama for getting that out and closing the match. Monfils always challenged him
« Federer was losing »… stop this click bait nonsense.
5:32 Someone who understands editing I see, nice cut
Nice catch!
Im not catchin on what did he do for editing?
@@drbookie2169 look at the score
@@drbookie2169 look at the score
@@drbookie2169 watch the score
Roger Federer really was amazing.
Wow...What an intense match it was 😮
He wasn’t “Super Angry”. I am about this click bait though!
he was
Have been a big Federer fan since the beginning of his career, but only lately have i started noticing how salty he got whenever he felt there was a genuine threat.
Wtf is this title
12:40 Handful of times Roger knew the ball was out before anyone on the court hahaha
When was he "super angry"?
Haha damn... Roger really is angry in this one. 😂 But I mean everybody has "tougher" days. Event hough he's the GOAT, still human :)
Monfils let it go before the ball was called out.
So point goes to Federer.
The challenged call on point 1 of the 7th game, of Set #3., was a right challenge, because it was found by Hawkeye, to be in. So why is Monfils even talking? he's like: After the match we will study the video at this point 3-3, and you will see. See what?, Hawkeye show that it was infact close to being out, but was, IN! Federer has a better eye from the other side of the court, than linesman standing 15 feet away from the line they are judging. smh
Good old battle between two veterans.
Monfils (France) like kirgios of Australia, not many major wins but very scary individual/unreal points. Robert at 69 in Arizona.
11:24 Monfils saying he let the ball go was 100% correct.
Unfortunately, it was because HE thought it was out, not because a linesman called it.
Roger Federer personified Panache and Genius!
Most don't realize that Federer has 1 or 2 extra levels that others don't have. He moved to the next level when he had to.
What a match
Monfils is a class act.
Roger the GOAT
11:25 If you came here looking for the angry part.
Losing?
Fed is the greatest watch and shoe salesman. His tennis was sqaush and thank god nadal/dj0oki came along to save tennis from fedsqaush. Fed had no fight, weak backhand ,weak mental strength all he had was winning the populatiry contest that big corp sold to the armchair tennis crowd..His carrerr record agaisnt his 2 rivals was a failure ..He only won 33% of his GS matches and GS finlas against novak/nadal..He couldn't even beat nadal once at french and only 2 other times on clay. Djoki beat nadal 9 times on clay ,2 times at french and Just recently at Olympics on NAdal grounds again!! Fed won 15 slams in the goldilocks era 2003-2009 when sampras/aggassi were leaving ..after nadal/djoki/murray/wawrinka got going fed's sqaush game faded away and only won a handful of GS over the next 13 yrs!!
RF is under strain. I believe he may have a complaint with the umpire. he basically said that the umpire gave him no indication that the ball was close. having said that ...., i doubt that the umpires normally are responsible for that - though we might ask that of a good chair. RF is saying he should have looked over to him indicating the ball could be challenged. as far as Monfils - he did not challenge a call but later complained about it. that is a low-level person. have to call a spade a spade here ....
man, Monfils gets to some of these so fast it doesnt look as impressive as it is.
Click ‘baitish’ this one. It’s not as dramatic as the title implies. Don’t overhype a video for the views - no-one has time for that anymore.
龍爭虎鬥，超級好看的，很明顯費神有受到裁判誤判的影響
SUPER ANGRY?
hardly🤣.
A tad petulant perhaps.
He would probably throw racquets in the stands. lol
Roger's biggest outburst is still much nicer than Novaxx best behavior
Why the stupid click-bait title?
Not necessary - was a good match for both players - Monfils gave as good as he got and played many brilliant points against an on form Federer.
Monfis got cheated on some points. SOmetimes I feel it s fixed more for the dominant player.
pretty classic .... Federers opponent is physically more gifter, but mentally less gifted. period. this guy could have won numerous points where he just kind of hit average returns at a crucial moment in the point.
we honestly cannot say RF is " less gifted . " we certainly can say as you say, that RF tends to grossly outperform his opponents mentally. without RF these guys at the top level are monsters of base-line technique. when RF is on he makes them - honestly - seem like lost children .
First of all title is clickbait, second of all, why would the video be good???? All he did was edit the match
Aint nothing without Novak is dramatic
Rafa had the same problem when Carlos seat on umpire chair
reported for false title
Monfils lost two points to the Umpires mistakes.
Most dramatic match ever? That is rubbish. Do you realize how annoying those false titles are.
Sorry about that. It's how the internet works nowadays unfortunately
"Losing". Clickbait.
bring back the old intro
It's never gone buddy. But only in grand slam videos unfortunately
really, most dramatic match ever?
what a great match wow
Typical classless Federer.
Clickbait title and a crap umpire.
SUPER BS CAPTION
Annoying clickbait
Lousy video with deceiving title 👎
Clickbait bs
federers a baby
nonsense clickbait.
Sometimes I just got sick of Federer winning. WHy cant someone else win onc in awhile. Monfis should have won that one point and I think Fed knew it. WE all know Djokovic is the GOAT
I’m a big fan of RF But This is the first time I see That nervous & I miss the respect 4 him , sorry munfis with all respect to you ❤
😂
Monfis had more respect in this match!
Most Dramatic Match EVER????? You are a LIER!!
WIVORN. your comments have nothing to do with the essence of sport. You are never close to reality. A disaster. Try one sport, any sport, if you only dare, and think it all over again. PLEASE,...
Black umpires are L
Federer is such a spoiled child! He is small compared to Nadal and Djoko
Nadal would have beaten this shaky Fed. After all, Nadal has winning H2H records vs. Fed not only on clay but also on outdoor hardcourt.
i take it you're an anti-Fed stanboy and i shouldn't be entertaining the troll, but what's Nadal got to do with this?
@@sabbialmighty7249 Monfils has similar exquisite ball-volleying skills as Nadal, but not the same mental toughness.
@@danbotez1307 maybe so but Nadal still has nothing to do with this video. We could say the same about Wawrinka or del Potro, so why does Nadal get special mention?
@@sabbialmighty7249 I beg to disagree. Neither Wawrinka nor del Potro have/had the exquisite ball-volleying skills of Nadal. Watching Monfils reminded me of how Nadal annihilated Fed's aggressive play. Then again, Nadal had the high-kicking forehand on Fed's backhand side which Fed couldn't handle, and which nobody was able to replicate.
Monfils upset Fed in the indoor court final of one Paris Masters. Quite an achievement, given Fed's dominant indoor play, mainly fueled, as he was aging, by bomb serves.
@@danbotez1307 i will definitely agree that Nadal's ball striking was out of this world, and both Nadal and Fed had to be at their best to beat each other. My question still remains though, why bring Nadal up?
Federer was on the way Losing all his record to nadal, but then cames the serbinator alias Novak GOATkovic
Yes federer is the goat
Well, Djokovic won half of his Slams when Federer and Nadal (and Murray) were all basically done.
Still, Djokovic lost finals to guys like Wawrinka and Medvedev... Federer also won most of his Slams during a weak era (before Nadal, Djokovic and Murray). It's only Nadal who always had to compete with the best throughout his career.
@@marcusbrspok for you djokovic won 12 grandslams in a weak era from 2018-2023, but nadals 8 grandslams from 2017-2022 was in a strong era or also in a weak era? WHEN YOU SAYS weak era, then you should also put nadals 6 grandslam from 2008-2010 in a weak era categorie, because 2008 was even baby weak djokovic better then prime federer and won more big titles and was in the same rankinging points like federer in 2008 and weak djokovic was even in his worst season of his life 2010, from French open 2010 until us open 2010 better then federer.that shows how weak actually were the season 2008 and 2010. Sinner and alcaraz were 2023 better then federer and djokovic in 2008 and 2010. Even federer and nadal were from 2015-2022 better then djokovic and federer from 2008-10
@@travisbickle5279 sure, Nadal definitely had a few "freebies" in there as well. But he had way less than Federer and Djokovic.
Fed is best player ever. Sooo much fun to watch Nadal too and now it's up to Carlos to carry the talent flam and run with it
3 federer
2nadal
1 GOATkovic
Yes Federer is goat and Djokovic is 3rd which is also not bad
These clowns are so jealous of Fed.
@@sageantone7291 of course i m jeleaus of federer , nadal and djokovic, but still novak is the goat
@@travisbickle5279 he isn't
What made him super angry is him finished 3rd after Nadal and Djokovovic
You mean Federer the goat?
No wonder your name are random letters.
Poor Roger-obsessed attention-seeking pos.
Ow what a hater, so sad
You guys are so sad.