Arthur III de Richemont (1393-1458) is also worthy of a video biography. His mother was Queen of England but he was a French commander at Agincourt where he was wounded in the face. He survived and, long story short, rode with Joan at Patay, conducted a bloodless palace coup in 1433, organised the Treaty of Arras, reinvigorated the French military and financial system, liberated Paris and drove the English out of Normandy. He inherited Brittany and refused to pay homage to Charles VII for the Duchy.
This video says she served "mainly as an inspirational figure" but also says she "led" the army. The first one is more correct, since historians have pointed out that the military records list the actual command structure; the eyewitnesses said the actual commanders often didn't even tell her their plans (although some of them said they asked her for advice after becoming convinced she was Divinely inspired), and Joan denied calling herself a commander. Historians have also debunked the idea that "Charles did nothing to save her", since there were at least four rescue attempts by his army and he also tried to pay a ransom to free her but the Burgundians refused. Claiming that "the English turned her over to the Church" is badly misleading since English government records admit that they summoned the tribunal which was selected from pro-English collaborators: the judge, Pierre Cauchon, was an advisor for the English occupation government, and many eyewitnesses said he corrupted the trial on behalf of his government. The mental illness idea has been debunked by many doctors as well as historians, since epilepsy and schizophrenia both include outward symptoms (seizures in the case of the first and various behavioral problems in the case of the second) that would have been noticeable to the people around her and also debilitating. That quote mentioned near the end ("To sacrifice what you are....") comes from a fictional play called "Joan of Lorraine" by Anderson Maxwell, and is not historical, nor does it sound like anything she actually said.
Her father was the prévôt of the region and he rented the Fortress de l'Ilse from the Bourlémont aristocratic family when the Bourguignons invaded the region . Jehanne la Pucelle never used that particular family during her lifetime ! She left for France, early February 1429 . She was ambushed at Compiègne, Guillaume de Flavy, the nephew of Regnault de Chartres and first adviser to Charles VII had closed the main gate as she was stepping on the drawbridge. Concerning the visions and voices , this is still a dilemma, today. St Katherine of Alexandria and Margaret of Antioch never existed and were removed from the Roman Catholic Church in 1969 ! There were no attempts to save Jehanne and no ransom requested by the English. Worse, after the capture of Jehanne, the bishop of Chartres indicated to Charles VII to distance himself from Jehanne !
@@RayB1656 I didn't say she was "only an inspirational figure"; I said that claim was _closer_ to history than the claim that she led directly or fought. She didn't "joust": none of the eyewitness sources make such a claim, nor did she. The horses and swords were given to her by nobles as gifts, but she didn't use the swords (except to hit prostitutes on one occasion, according to two eyewitnesses), and none of the horses are described as "warhorses" in the records (just "horses" AFAIK), and she certainly didn't have "seven years" of training since that would mean we're supposed to believe she was training ever since the age of nine years old (LOL). None of the eyewitnesses ever claimed she used "small cannons on wheels" (you may be thinking of Jehan de Montsiler, who fought at Orleans with such a cannon). Franquet d'Arras was captured by Armagnac troops, not by Joan personally. The comment about "Orghamalphabet bell coding system" doesn't make any sense at all. The "Bishop" [sic] of Chartres was actually an Archbishop, and he had approved her in April 1429 at Poitiers (the fact that he later criticized her for trying to help Compiegne doesn't make him her "worst enemy"). As for St. Catherine and St. Margaret allegedly not being historical people: there are multiple saints with both of those names and Joan never said which ones she was referring to; only two of them are in dispute as historical persons and even those two are debated rather than being rejected by all historians. On the subject of rescue attempts: many historians such as Pierre Champion have pointed out that there were at least four military campaigns (some historians also include a fifth) to rescue her, led mainly by Dunois and La Hire (not Gilles de Rais), and literally all the 15th century sources which comment on the matter agree that Charles VII tried a number of methods to save her. Joan's father was the doyen of the village of Domremy, not the prevost of the entire Barrois region (which has little relevance to anything under discussion in any event).
My 8 year old son found the typo in the the Trial & Death section. The first line states, “In 1430, Joan was taken captive by Burgundians”. On the fifth line it states, “ Burned at the stake in Rouen on May 29, 1413.” How can she die before she was taken captive?
I understand that she had a good opinion on physical scars. having been wounded several times in battle Joan apparently had one on her shoulder from when a arrow went into her chest and one on her foot from standing on a spike while getting off her horse.
Joan of Arc was age 19 when she died, not age 1. Please get the facts straight. Your presentation is very good, but the facts need help. Joan died on May 30 (not May 29) in the year 1431 (not 1413) A.D.. Joan did not fall off her horse to become captured. Joan was locked outside the gates of the city of Compiegne on May 23, 1430 A.D. and captured by the Burgundian wolves (French loyal to England), in a civil war with their own Frenchmen. Historians don't know why she was locked out. I do. To fulfill ancient prophecy from the Bible Old Testament Book of Judges chapters 19-21 (The 11 Tribes of Israel Civil War with Benjamin Tribe). The Levite's concubine wife was locked outside the door of the house all night long and left to be ravaged to death by evil men. The Levite was not concerned about his concubine wife nor was King Charles VII concerned about Joan of Arc locked outside the city gates. The Levite had ordered it. And so too, we can surmise that Charles ordered it. The Benjamin Tribe wolves are the Burgundian wolves. The Pope (Saint Pius X) has declared France to be the "Tribe of Judah of the New Covenant.". "Judah Tribe shall go out first against the Benjamin Tribe." -- God Almighty (Judges 19-21). Another thing people should know is that Joan did not have dreams and visions. Joan spoke face-to-face with the saints of heaven. Joan was "more than a prophetess" just as Moses was "more than a prophet". Joan said she could see/hear/smell/feel Saint Michael the archangel, and that he was in the form of a man. This is why Joan was executed (along with the cross-dressing) because the Church had long concluded that angels were spirit beings only, not spirit/physical beings. Joan of Arc most certainly fought in battle. She was mortally wounded twice (chest/heart at Orleans, head at Jargeau), but Joan recovered the same day to go on to conquer in both instances. Joan killed 4000 Englishmen at the open field battle of Patay, with only 3 of Joan's Frenchmen being killed. Song of Songs(Solomon) 6:10 KJV - "Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?"
That is not how mortaly wounded works. Being mortaly wounded mean you die from it. You said she was mortaly wounded TWICE? Hint: she lived after Orleans
Arthur III de Richemont (1393-1458) is also worthy of a video biography. His mother was Queen of England but he was a French commander at Agincourt where he was wounded in the face. He survived and, long story short, rode with Joan at Patay, conducted a bloodless palace coup in 1433, organised the Treaty of Arras, reinvigorated the French military and financial system, liberated Paris and drove the English out of Normandy. He inherited Brittany and refused to pay homage to Charles VII for the Duchy.
I feel really bad for you because you are the only one who has commented so I will leave a like to your comment
now its 2 comments, I mean 3
This video says she served "mainly as an inspirational figure" but also says she "led" the army. The first one is more correct, since historians have pointed out that the military records list the actual command structure; the eyewitnesses said the actual commanders often didn't even tell her their plans (although some of them said they asked her for advice after becoming convinced she was Divinely inspired), and Joan denied calling herself a commander. Historians have also debunked the idea that "Charles did nothing to save her", since there were at least four rescue attempts by his army and he also tried to pay a ransom to free her but the Burgundians refused. Claiming that "the English turned her over to the Church" is badly misleading since English government records admit that they summoned the tribunal which was selected from pro-English collaborators: the judge, Pierre Cauchon, was an advisor for the English occupation government, and many eyewitnesses said he corrupted the trial on behalf of his government. The mental illness idea has been debunked by many doctors as well as historians, since epilepsy and schizophrenia both include outward symptoms (seizures in the case of the first and various behavioral problems in the case of the second) that would have been noticeable to the people around her and also debilitating. That quote mentioned near the end ("To sacrifice what you are....") comes from a fictional play called "Joan of Lorraine" by Anderson Maxwell, and is not historical, nor does it sound like anything she actually said.
Her father was the prévôt of the region and he rented the Fortress de l'Ilse from the Bourlémont aristocratic family when the Bourguignons invaded the region .
Jehanne la Pucelle never used that particular family during her lifetime !
She left for France, early February 1429 .
She was ambushed at Compiègne, Guillaume de Flavy, the nephew of Regnault de Chartres and first adviser to Charles VII had closed the main gate as she was stepping on the drawbridge.
Concerning the visions and voices , this is still a dilemma, today. St Katherine of Alexandria and Margaret of Antioch never existed and were removed from the Roman Catholic Church in 1969 !
There were no attempts to save Jehanne and no ransom requested by the English.
Worse, after the capture of Jehanne, the bishop of Chartres indicated to Charles VII to distance himself from Jehanne !
@@RayB1656 I didn't say she was "only an inspirational figure"; I said that claim was _closer_ to history than the claim that she led directly or fought. She didn't "joust": none of the eyewitness sources make such a claim, nor did she. The horses and swords were given to her by nobles as gifts, but she didn't use the swords (except to hit prostitutes on one occasion, according to two eyewitnesses), and none of the horses are described as "warhorses" in the records (just "horses" AFAIK), and she certainly didn't have "seven years" of training since that would mean we're supposed to believe she was training ever since the age of nine years old (LOL). None of the eyewitnesses ever claimed she used "small cannons on wheels" (you may be thinking of Jehan de Montsiler, who fought at Orleans with such a cannon). Franquet d'Arras was captured by Armagnac troops, not by Joan personally. The comment about "Orghamalphabet bell coding system" doesn't make any sense at all. The "Bishop" [sic] of Chartres was actually an Archbishop, and he had approved her in April 1429 at Poitiers (the fact that he later criticized her for trying to help Compiegne doesn't make him her "worst enemy"). As for St. Catherine and St. Margaret allegedly not being historical people: there are multiple saints with both of those names and Joan never said which ones she was referring to; only two of them are in dispute as historical persons and even those two are debated rather than being rejected by all historians. On the subject of rescue attempts: many historians such as Pierre Champion have pointed out that there were at least four military campaigns (some historians also include a fifth) to rescue her, led mainly by Dunois and La Hire (not Gilles de Rais), and literally all the 15th century sources which comment on the matter agree that Charles VII tried a number of methods to save her. Joan's father was the doyen of the village of Domremy, not the prevost of the entire Barrois region (which has little relevance to anything under discussion in any event).
Interesting animation!😊❤⚘️
nice video well done and i just wanted to knowwhat dose a heretic mean
SAINT Joan the Maiden, please pray for us, miserable offenders...
I love the straightforward organization of facts.
My 8 year old son found the typo in the the Trial & Death section. The first line states, “In 1430, Joan was taken captive by Burgundians”. On the fifth line it states, “ Burned at the stake in Rouen on May 29, 1413.”
How can she die before she was taken captive?
Karen
@@wisp385 looooooooool
Typo, should be 1431
I understand that she had a good opinion on physical scars.
having been wounded several times in battle Joan apparently had one on her shoulder from when a arrow went into her chest and one on her foot from standing on a spike while getting off her horse.
Joan of Arc was age 19 when she died, not age 1. Please get the facts straight. Your presentation is very good, but the facts need help. Joan died on May 30 (not May 29) in the year 1431 (not 1413) A.D.. Joan did not fall off her horse to become captured. Joan was locked outside the gates of the city of Compiegne on May 23, 1430 A.D. and captured by the Burgundian wolves (French loyal to England), in a civil war with their own Frenchmen. Historians don't know why she was locked out. I do. To fulfill ancient prophecy from the Bible Old Testament Book of Judges chapters 19-21 (The 11 Tribes of Israel Civil War with Benjamin Tribe). The Levite's concubine wife was locked outside the door of the house all night long and left to be ravaged to death by evil men. The Levite was not concerned about his concubine wife nor was King Charles VII concerned about Joan of Arc locked outside the city gates. The Levite had ordered it. And so too, we can surmise that Charles ordered it. The Benjamin Tribe wolves are the Burgundian wolves. The Pope (Saint Pius X) has declared France to be the "Tribe of Judah of the New Covenant.". "Judah Tribe shall go out first against the Benjamin Tribe." -- God Almighty (Judges 19-21). Another thing people should know is that Joan did not have dreams and visions. Joan spoke face-to-face with the saints of heaven. Joan was "more than a prophetess" just as Moses was "more than a prophet". Joan said she could see/hear/smell/feel Saint Michael the archangel, and that he was in the form of a man. This is why Joan was executed (along with the cross-dressing) because the Church had long concluded that angels were spirit beings only, not spirit/physical beings. Joan of Arc most certainly fought in battle. She was mortally wounded twice (chest/heart at Orleans, head at Jargeau), but Joan recovered the same day to go on to conquer in both instances. Joan killed 4000 Englishmen at the open field battle of Patay, with only 3 of Joan's Frenchmen being killed. Song of Songs(Solomon) 6:10 KJV - "Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?"
Nerd
That is not how mortaly wounded works. Being mortaly wounded mean you die from it. You said she was mortaly wounded TWICE? Hint: she lived after Orleans
lol life
Joan of Arc was no hero great leader or Commander feminism BS!
She is a canonized Saint!