Last time I checked this guy was considered to be an ISTJ...? I just realized. We don't only type ourselves upside down... We type others upside down as well
Yes 'cause when someone refuses their own type, their view of other gets upside down, I always see sensors typing themself as intuitives because they think of themself as quiky and creative even tho everything in their home is perfectly incline à 45 degres on their shelf.
If anyone wants to hear some of the best personal finance and investing advice, he's one of the best people to listen to. Dude sees through the type-related biases in the personal finance community and finds much better alternatives.
I never thought Warren Buffet was an ENTP, but admittedly I know almost nothing of him. I would have to make my own research for that. 3:05 But as an ENTP myself, this was way too relatable. Me just wanting to talk about a topic, have a lot of nuances, and then the single decider forcing an agenda and or simple answer to the topic. Warren looked extremely confused, right after she said that question, and I was too. I laughed as soon as she made that question. It always catches me off guard, like why do you want to have a bad guy so badly? Things are never black and white.
@@sullt766 Never said it was an only ENTP thing tho. I can see how you might have gotten that idea tho, I did elaborate a bit on how Ne Ti play a role, and then went on to speak in more general terms. I should have been clearer on how I presented it. But I can only speak for myself, if you are an observer, I would appreciate if you could elaborate on how it works for you.
@@SerpentineWisdom You do realize that the black and white fallacy or analogy is not speaking about absolutes, right? Black and white fallacy is about reducing a complex topic to a false dichotomy or an extremely simple answer. Me saying things are never black and white, does not mean there are no absolutes. They are two very different things. For example, one could ask "What is gravity?" And one could respond "Gravity is the reason we fall". The statement will be true, but any physicist will tell you that the answer is incomplete. So is there an absolute answer to the question? most likely. Did the answer given is the absolute truth? not really, because the absolute truth is more complex than that. Is the answer incorrect? not at all.... An statement can be both extremely simplistic and true. But also it couldn't be the only variable. One could respond to the question, "What causes gravity to exist?" and you could respond with "matter". Which would be true, but there are plenty of other variables such as space time, quantum physics, quantum field, forces, etc. So the answer is correct, but it is not the only answer. So once again, both saying nothing ever is black and white, and absolutes exist, are not contradictory at all. So in short, it is not as simple as you make it out to be.
@@farrex0 I am an observer, infj. I do think that the observer coin originates from all observer types have thinking and feeling functions in the middle, this gives them the ability to judge information in the thinking and feeling way. Now when a single decider comes along such as an isfp and makes us only consider the feeling perspective, due to Te being a demon. Since its a demon they naturally avoid using function just like how all types avoid using their demon. In the case of all deciders is that there lowest function/demon function is always a thinking or feeling function, this leaves them with the only preferred way of making decisions being their hero function. Now when a decider asks an observer, "who's the bad guy?", the observer is in shock or confusion, this is because the observer can judge who's the bad guy from the feeling and thinking perspective, whereby the decider can only judge who's the bad guy using their 1 function, namely, (Te, Ti, Fe or Fi). We must remember all double deciders are single observers and that all single deciders are double observers. ,- According to this dynamic, we can also conclude that observers who have either, Ne, Se, Ni or Si as a demon would not have a natural tendency with considering the sensing and intuitive perspective in most matters, and this is assumption is true. This is proved by the fact that this is one of the ways dave and shan type people, seeing whether they get excited or anxious over the observer things (objects, concepts, ect) or the decider things (people, 'bad guy, good guy'). The observer would get exited and anxious over the observer things as they have a saviour observer and demon observer, so experiencing pleasure when using the hero and anxious when using the demon. The decider would get anxious or excited when asked to judge information, this ofcoirse, is linked to their decider function being a demon or a hero for all decider types. We must remember that people love using their saviour function in most cases and mostly avoid using demon when possible, from this dynamic we can type people easier as we now understand what we need to look for when observing people when trying to type them. This is how the observer decider coin was formed btw. There's a video on all the coins on their channel if your not familiar with all of them.
As an investor blast last May be ideal. Especially when so much consume and play and sleep are needed to make that ideal perfect blast a blast last dreams about. Interestingly, you can say any career or job or whatever which favours carefully placed decisions where time isn't against you much in favour to blast last users. Many music artist are blast last interestingly. I think blast lasts be successful as long as they focus on blasting in the end of what there doing and I'm.sire the same applies to all last animals users. The story is the same tbh, you've gotta fight the demon animal/function then you win the game.
Funny classic myers briggs and id labs types him ISTJ … which is exact inverse of Entp and could be well interpreted in both clarifying the theory on reflective functions and inverted sets…
'Not mine. I had great parents but I'm going to blast out how you should just get over your trauma.' I'm going to blast out that you don't know people's lives or past or abilities and should really stop judging. What you could say is, I think it would be helpful to realize that you actually are getting better every day and you are trying and you can find mentors. My favorite mentor is Jesus and there are many others. I would not go so far as to say get over it like you just did. How about you get over something and then tell us how you did it. Share YOUR experience don't judge mine please and thanks or hey do what you want but MY God knows what I have been through and only Him.
What is the difference between blast vs play? Is play more "experiential" while blast is more "textbooks + megaphone" with little experience? I believe I have Blast over play, sleep over consume
Speaking of humane billionaires, there's a channel called 'Kathy Loves Physics' (very good history of science content) who did a video on Westinghouse. Apparently he was a solid bloke, and really good to like everyone.
Defnitely NT, likely P but also likely I. This man has been locked up in a room for decades reading 10Qs and enjoying it. Not a typical E type of activity, I would think.
About investing logic.. I was watching the current episode of Tom Bilyeu with Robert Breedlove, and they were discussing logic, theories and gut feeling about inflation or deflation encouraging innovation. It made me think of my ISTP friends who seem to glorify having "less" because it makes them more creative, and having a very hard time seeing how abundance can foster liveliness and freedom of movement, what I would have thought is feminine energy but now I think it might have to do with Ne and Te? I am so confused. But maybe you have insights on how the different types view ressources and incentives differently? Which types do we tend to find in which groups when it comes to financial theories?
"Bubbles are always hard to ascertain the originators" -would high Ne struggle to speculate as he seems to? ...When giving life advice, he says "Picking carefully who you associate with" which sounds like Te-Fi value statement doesn't it? "Picking carefully" sounds like his Ne is lower down, like he's worried about his choices and possibilities and is very careful with them. "Pick a spouse that's better than you are" - Again more Te-Fi value statement. ENTP would be more critical, warning you: "Do you really want to have a bad spouse, do you?" ... "You hope they don't figure it out too fast" -again more worried Ne, not optimistic like an ENTP would typically be. "This is just a sample of our competence" Again more Te-Fi awareness of his capabilities and those around him... I like his constant storytelling, in a high Si way, including his fairy tale ending: "We made a deal and lived happily ever after."
God my ENTJ Dad loves Warren Buffet always has and yes you’re doing it wrong Dave hahaha I sent you stock advice hahaha like probably somewhere in the middle of the emails ahhahaha. Love NT’s love you guys. Glad to see you still going, read my emails Dave Ahha love you two!! 😊
Interesting. I always assumed Buffet is an ISTJ. Either I'm being corrected or OPS is on a mistyping run. They did type Joe Rogan ENTJ, when conventional opinion is ESTP. And it's obvious to me.
I do think the problem of similar types typing others could be a blame as similar types may make similar mistakes. This may be horrible especially when Considering its an intj and entj typing together. Historically speaking, there has been disagreements with dave and shan and other typer UA-cam, namely, Binyamin Tsadik, who is an istp. I do think typing should be done as collective with people for different types typing together so we can call out each others mistakes and also contribute our unique traits, I've seen this from experience to where jm an infj and my brother an isfp have different types, but thennwe discuss and understand each others points on why we think that's person is that certain type then we ofcourse come to a sinlgusr decision to which we are both confident on. Hopefully objective personality do aspire to have collective typing, rather than just 2 individuals, that would be wonderful
Joe Rogan is definitely an ENTJ and definitely an ENTJ jumper TeSe. The guy is all Te frankly. He is way too straightforward to be an ESTP. He has no Fe whatsoever and his logic is nowhere close to Ti. Many times simple Ti logic seems to escape his mind totally, he gets stuck with details and can´t get through them. ESTP´s in my view are way more flexible in their approach at dealing with people and accepting new information. Joe just tells people what it is, ESTP´s debate, but also take people into consideration. ESTP´s are all about interacting, Joe doesn´t interact, he either steamrolls on people or laughs, the guy has no nuance in the complexity of his emotional response, unlike an ESTP would with their Fe. A good example of an actual ESTP podcaster is Patrick Bett-David, they are two completely different kinds of people. Joe is way too blunt and simplistic in his interactions to be an ESTP. Hell even Donald Trump who is an actual ESTP has more of that Fe swagger than Joe. Joe seeks to charm nobody, unlike ESTP´s. Joe also has Ni as a stronger function than as his inferior. ESTP´s go through crazy ideas through their Ti, which is systemic logic, Joe get´s all starry-eyed about "mysterious ideas". ESTP´s tend to not be able to accept ideas based on intuition so they try to debate against them. Joe only point´s out the facts are not true and leaves it at that. Other than that the guy has an almost incessant need to entertain crazy ideas, if there´s even a slight chance it could be he is open to it. While he doesn´t have the level of nuance with his Ni as a strong Ni user would, it is definitely not his inferior function either. I have listened to Joe Rogan experience for a decade and it infuriates me how people type him as an ESTP and I´m not even in the OP community. Mind you a TeSe ENTJ is totally different than a traditional TeNi ENTJ. TeSe is kind of like the "ESTP" version of an ENTJ.
@@tikari3987 And just like the ENFJ. However, ENTPs aren't direct, they're informal while ENFJs are direct. In any case, I can't see Rogan as an ENTJ. Typing is really hard, but OP shouldn't have gotten this wrong.
It's much easier to blame your parents for everything bad in your life than it is to grow a pair and take responsibility for yourself, because then you're actually on your to own.
As an ISTJ Warren Buffet primarily invests in traditional Si companies. And has Si loyalty to the stocks he buys. He has lived in the same house for the past 50 years that is worth less than 1 million dollars. An ENTP would never do that. ENTPs are movement types that jump around. Warren Buffet is as steady and boring that an ISTJ can ever be. 😴
Disagree largely. You've taken such a short clips where to talks about concepts - wouldn't it be rationale to assume that his Ne would develop as he age's and gains more experience. I think he's an istj and the vast majority do too.
He seems like INTJi to me. Intuition is for ENTPs more about collecting ideas, so that they can inspire someone else to do things. Like NDG Tyson. Almost all he does are inspirational speeches. Ni is about finding connections/influences between events - Se. Which is what Buffet was doing most of the time. And that is to calm down Si during changes in their environment . Ni is like "Dude, chill. This is normal. Here's how you can navigate through this ". Because opposite functions completer each other (opposite like Ni-Si, Ne-Se). Si is responsible for emotions towards environment. And Ni is about resolution to those emotions. Either providing way to solve problems, or to achieve desires. And as Te-Fi, he is quick to say about his own faults. So that he cannot be blamed for unawareness of his incompetence. Ti do not do that. Because they do not know when to do that. So their fear is about being blamed for incompetency. Which is not really problem for Te people.
You two have a great setup and are fun to watch but I think your channel would be more popular if you stopped using the made up terms like blast last de di etc. I understand trying to be innovative but you guys are just a UA-cam channel at this point and unless you gain some huge popularity and become more established, you kinda just look alittle incredible with the made up stuff and it really loses my interest, because I’m not interested in learning about something you guys made up. It’s not really useful in the real world because I can’t talk about it to anyone because it doesn’t exist. Would be a lot more interesting if you guys just stick to what’s in the books. Imagine if I came at you with made up terms like feels peels and Ge parent it just doesn’t sound factual at all. I literally feel like clicking away every time I hear the un factual stuff and it’s a shame because I actually like when you guys talk about what’s really mbti.
Kinda sounds like u just haven't watched all the videos where they defined their terms and why they're using them. Honestly, their method allows for way more nuance than the MBTI that's usually discussed and allows us to get closer to looking at how people actually ARE instead of how they should or could be like the usual MBTI
Then the question is... Should we fight for sucess? Do you consider Buddah successful? There are lots of ways you can find success and still not have a lot of money
Watching Dave when Mr. Buffet was saying 'marry someone slightly better than you' is GOLD.
Last time I checked this guy was considered to be an ISTJ...?
I just realized.
We don't only type ourselves upside down...
We type others upside down as well
Yes 'cause when someone refuses their own type, their view of other gets upside down, I always see sensors typing themself as intuitives because they think of themself as quiky and creative even tho everything in their home is perfectly incline à 45 degres on their shelf.
@@gistar22 à
Would upside down for a Entp be an ISFJ?
I like how the kid said Warren "was good at taking credit" at the end there. Haha.
“Who let the decider in the room?” Guess she wasn’t allowed to be there.
If anyone wants to hear some of the best personal finance and investing advice, he's one of the best people to listen to.
Dude sees through the type-related biases in the personal finance community and finds much better alternatives.
Habits and education that is how you judge your parents.
I never thought Warren Buffet was an ENTP, but admittedly I know almost nothing of him. I would have to make my own research for that.
3:05 But as an ENTP myself, this was way too relatable. Me just wanting to talk about a topic, have a lot of nuances, and then the single decider forcing an agenda and or simple answer to the topic.
Warren looked extremely confused, right after she said that question, and I was too. I laughed as soon as she made that question. It always catches me off guard, like why do you want to have a bad guy so badly? Things are never black and white.
Any observer would relate to that. Not just an entp
The irony of how "Things are never black and white." is literally...a black and white claim. Absolute in nature.
It's inevitable.🤷🏾♂️
@@sullt766 Never said it was an only ENTP thing tho. I can see how you might have gotten that idea tho, I did elaborate a bit on how Ne Ti play a role, and then went on to speak in more general terms. I should have been clearer on how I presented it.
But I can only speak for myself, if you are an observer, I would appreciate if you could elaborate on how it works for you.
@@SerpentineWisdom You do realize that the black and white fallacy or analogy is not speaking about absolutes, right? Black and white fallacy is about reducing a complex topic to a false dichotomy or an extremely simple answer.
Me saying things are never black and white, does not mean there are no absolutes. They are two very different things.
For example, one could ask "What is gravity?" And one could respond "Gravity is the reason we fall". The statement will be true, but any physicist will tell you that the answer is incomplete. So is there an absolute answer to the question? most likely. Did the answer given is the absolute truth? not really, because the absolute truth is more complex than that. Is the answer incorrect? not at all....
An statement can be both extremely simplistic and true. But also it couldn't be the only variable. One could respond to the question, "What causes gravity to exist?" and you could respond with "matter". Which would be true, but there are plenty of other variables such as space time, quantum physics, quantum field, forces, etc. So the answer is correct, but it is not the only answer.
So once again, both saying nothing ever is black and white, and absolutes exist, are not contradictory at all. So in short, it is not as simple as you make it out to be.
@@farrex0 I am an observer, infj. I do think that the observer coin originates from all observer types have thinking and feeling functions in the middle, this gives them the ability to judge information in the thinking and feeling way. Now when a single decider comes along such as an isfp and makes us only consider the feeling perspective, due to Te being a demon. Since its a demon they naturally avoid using function just like how all types avoid using their demon. In the case of all deciders is that there lowest function/demon function is always a thinking or feeling function, this leaves them with the only preferred way of making decisions being their hero function.
Now when a decider asks an observer, "who's the bad guy?", the observer is in shock or confusion, this is because the observer can judge who's the bad guy from the feeling and thinking perspective, whereby the decider can only judge who's the bad guy using their 1 function, namely, (Te, Ti, Fe or Fi).
We must remember all double deciders are single observers and that all single deciders are double observers. ,- According to this dynamic, we can also conclude that observers who have either, Ne, Se, Ni or Si as a demon would not have a natural tendency with considering the sensing and intuitive perspective in most matters, and this is assumption is true. This is proved by the fact that this is one of the ways dave and shan type people, seeing whether they get excited or anxious over the observer things (objects, concepts, ect) or the decider things (people, 'bad guy, good guy'). The observer would get exited and anxious over the observer things as they have a saviour observer and demon observer, so experiencing pleasure when using the hero and anxious when using the demon. The decider would get anxious or excited when asked to judge information, this ofcoirse, is linked to their decider function being a demon or a hero for all decider types.
We must remember that people love using their saviour function in most cases and mostly avoid using demon when possible, from this dynamic we can type people easier as we now understand what we need to look for when observing people when trying to type them. This is how the observer decider coin was formed btw. There's a video on all the coins on their channel if your not familiar with all of them.
everyone here is thinkin' y'all typed him wrong and I'm just sitting here inspired that someone is blast last and rich at the same time
As an investor blast last May be ideal. Especially when so much consume and play and sleep are needed to make that ideal perfect blast a blast last dreams about. Interestingly, you can say any career or job or whatever which favours carefully placed decisions where time isn't against you much in favour to blast last users. Many music artist are blast last interestingly.
I think blast lasts be successful as long as they focus on blasting in the end of what there doing and I'm.sire the same applies to all last animals users. The story is the same tbh, you've gotta fight the demon animal/function then you win the game.
Elon musk is also blast last. It’s all about how you use the parts you have
This doesn't look like Shan hysterically laughing at Dave's joke from the Kate Mckinnon class. 😝
Funny classic myers briggs and id labs types him ISTJ … which is exact inverse of Entp and could be well interpreted in both clarifying the theory on reflective functions and inverted sets…
He’s an ISTJ! been pegged as a famously introverted forever including in Susan Cane’s book “quiet”.
'Not mine. I had great parents but I'm going to blast out how you should just get over your trauma.'
I'm going to blast out that you don't know people's lives or past or abilities and should really stop judging. What you could say is, I think it would be helpful to realize that you actually are getting better every day and you are trying and you can find mentors.
My favorite mentor is Jesus and there are many others. I would not go so far as to say get over it like you just did. How about you get over something and then tell us how you did it. Share YOUR experience don't judge mine please and thanks or hey do what you want but MY God knows what I have been through and only Him.
What is the difference between blast vs play? Is play more "experiential" while blast is more "textbooks + megaphone" with little experience?
I believe I have Blast over play, sleep over consume
Speaking of humane billionaires, there's a channel called 'Kathy Loves Physics' (very good history of science content) who did a video on Westinghouse. Apparently he was a solid bloke, and really good to like everyone.
Defnitely NT, likely P but also likely I. This man has been locked up in a room for decades reading 10Qs and enjoying it. Not a typical E type of activity, I would think.
It seems you are pretty new...
@@lonelypad3993 Maybe expand your line of thinking?
@@jacobleedgaard5968 maybe not
@@lonelypad3993 What an inspiring fellow you are.
@@jacobleedgaard5968 thanks
How long do you think it took them to realize that Zuckerberg was their Undercover Boss?
🤔🤓🤣
About investing logic.. I was watching the current episode of Tom Bilyeu with Robert Breedlove, and they were discussing logic, theories and gut feeling about inflation or deflation encouraging innovation.
It made me think of my ISTP friends who seem to glorify having "less" because it makes them more creative, and having a very hard time seeing how abundance can foster liveliness and freedom of movement, what I would have thought is feminine energy but now I think it might have to do with Ne and Te?
I am so confused. But maybe you have insights on how the different types view ressources and incentives differently? Which types do we tend to find in which groups when it comes to financial theories?
He kinda sounds like George RR Martin
Logic: analogies and metaphor BOOM “we got ourselves an ENTP” 🤡
"Bubbles are always hard to ascertain the originators" -would high Ne struggle to speculate as he seems to? ...When giving life advice, he says "Picking carefully who you associate with" which sounds like Te-Fi value statement doesn't it? "Picking carefully" sounds like his Ne is lower down, like he's worried about his choices and possibilities and is very careful with them. "Pick a spouse that's better than you are" - Again more Te-Fi value statement. ENTP would be more critical, warning you: "Do you really want to have a bad spouse, do you?" ... "You hope they don't figure it out too fast" -again more worried Ne, not optimistic like an ENTP would typically be. "This is just a sample of our competence" Again more Te-Fi awareness of his capabilities and those around him... I like his constant storytelling, in a high Si way, including his fairy tale ending: "We made a deal and lived happily ever after."
Buffet was pretty quick to give away free product
God my ENTJ Dad loves Warren Buffet always has and yes you’re doing it wrong Dave hahaha I sent you stock advice hahaha like probably somewhere in the middle of the emails ahhahaha. Love NT’s love you guys. Glad to see you still going, read my emails Dave Ahha love you two!! 😊
what is single observer?
Im sorry but i just don't get entp- hes soooo consistent and organizing and doesn't have the single observer intensity etc etc
He can't tell you the Federal Reserve was responsible
Interesting. I always assumed Buffet is an ISTJ. Either I'm being corrected or OPS is on a mistyping run. They did type Joe Rogan ENTJ, when conventional opinion is ESTP. And it's obvious to me.
I do think the problem of similar types typing others could be a blame as similar types may make similar mistakes. This may be horrible especially when Considering its an intj and entj typing together. Historically speaking, there has been disagreements with dave and shan and other typer UA-cam, namely, Binyamin Tsadik, who is an istp. I do think typing should be done as collective with people for different types typing together so we can call out each others mistakes and also contribute our unique traits, I've seen this from experience to where jm an infj and my brother an isfp have different types, but thennwe discuss and understand each others points on why we think that's person is that certain type then we ofcourse come to a sinlgusr decision to which we are both confident on. Hopefully objective personality do aspire to have collective typing, rather than just 2 individuals, that would be wonderful
Joe Rogan is definitely an ENTJ and definitely an ENTJ jumper TeSe. The guy is all Te frankly. He is way too straightforward to be an ESTP. He has no Fe whatsoever and his logic is nowhere close to Ti. Many times simple Ti logic seems to escape his mind totally, he gets stuck with details and can´t get through them. ESTP´s in my view are way more flexible in their approach at dealing with people and accepting new information. Joe just tells people what it is, ESTP´s debate, but also take people into consideration. ESTP´s are all about interacting, Joe doesn´t interact, he either steamrolls on people or laughs, the guy has no nuance in the complexity of his emotional response, unlike an ESTP would with their Fe. A good example of an actual ESTP podcaster is Patrick Bett-David, they are two completely different kinds of people. Joe is way too blunt and simplistic in his interactions to be an ESTP. Hell even Donald Trump who is an actual ESTP has more of that Fe swagger than Joe. Joe seeks to charm nobody, unlike ESTP´s.
Joe also has Ni as a stronger function than as his inferior. ESTP´s go through crazy ideas through their Ti, which is systemic logic, Joe get´s all starry-eyed about "mysterious ideas". ESTP´s tend to not be able to accept ideas based on intuition so they try to debate against them. Joe only point´s out the facts are not true and leaves it at that. Other than that the guy has an almost incessant need to entertain crazy ideas, if there´s even a slight chance it could be he is open to it. While he doesn´t have the level of nuance with his Ni as a strong Ni user would, it is definitely not his inferior function either.
I have listened to Joe Rogan experience for a decade and it infuriates me how people type him as an ESTP and I´m not even in the OP community. Mind you a TeSe ENTJ is totally different than a traditional TeNi ENTJ. TeSe is kind of like the "ESTP" version of an ENTJ.
@@tikari3987 You’re 💯% wrong. The most direct extroverted types are ENTJs, ESTPs, ESTJs, and ENFJs.
@@faytwind3913 They are direct in different ways and ESTP's are more than just direct they have Fe just like ENTP's.
@@tikari3987 And just like the ENFJ. However, ENTPs aren't direct, they're informal while ENFJs are direct. In any case, I can't see Rogan as an ENTJ. Typing is really hard, but OP shouldn't have gotten this wrong.
It's much easier to blame your parents for everything bad in your life than it is to grow a pair and take responsibility for yourself, because then you're actually on your to own.
As an ISTJ Warren Buffet primarily invests in traditional Si companies. And has Si loyalty to the stocks he buys. He has lived in the same house for the past 50 years that is worth less than 1 million dollars. An ENTP would never do that. ENTPs are movement types that jump around. Warren Buffet is as steady and boring that an ISTJ can ever be. 😴
You guys typing Warren Buffet as an ENTP is proof of your complete incompetence.
He is textbook ISTJ.
Disagree largely. You've taken such a short clips where to talks about concepts - wouldn't it be rationale to assume that his Ne would develop as he age's and gains more experience. I think he's an istj and the vast majority do too.
Why do you believe he's an ISTJ? What aspects of his personality have you observed that have made you come to the conclusion that he's an ISTJ?
He seems like INTJi to me. Intuition is for ENTPs more about collecting ideas, so that they can inspire someone else to do things. Like NDG Tyson. Almost all he does are inspirational speeches.
Ni is about finding connections/influences between events - Se. Which is what Buffet was doing most of the time. And that is to calm down Si during changes in their environment . Ni is like "Dude, chill. This is normal. Here's how you can navigate through this ". Because opposite functions completer each other (opposite like Ni-Si, Ne-Se). Si is responsible for emotions towards environment. And Ni is about resolution to those emotions. Either providing way to solve problems, or to achieve desires.
And as Te-Fi, he is quick to say about his own faults. So that he cannot be blamed for unawareness of his incompetence. Ti do not do that. Because they do not know when to do that. So their fear is about being blamed for incompetency. Which is not really problem for Te people.
You two have a great setup and are fun to watch but I think your channel would be more popular if you stopped using the made up terms like blast last de di etc. I understand trying to be innovative but you guys are just a UA-cam channel at this point and unless you gain some huge popularity and become more established, you kinda just look alittle incredible with the made up stuff and it really loses my interest, because I’m not interested in learning about something you guys made up. It’s not really useful in the real world because I can’t talk about it to anyone because it doesn’t exist. Would be a lot more interesting if you guys just stick to what’s in the books. Imagine if I came at you with made up terms like feels peels and Ge parent it just doesn’t sound factual at all. I literally feel like clicking away every time I hear the un factual stuff and it’s a shame because I actually like when you guys talk about what’s really mbti.
Kinda sounds like u just haven't watched all the videos where they defined their terms and why they're using them. Honestly, their method allows for way more nuance than the MBTI that's usually discussed and allows us to get closer to looking at how people actually ARE instead of how they should or could be like the usual MBTI
OPS just typing people upside down for the shock value, and shock value = publicity = $$$
So money= success? ... What an outdated idea 🥱
Correlation not causation.
Then the question is... Should we fight for sucess?
Do you consider Buddah successful?
There are lots of ways you can find success and still not have a lot of money
@@dianadias3 it'd be pretty weird if Warren Buffett was a broke stock investor. I'd say given the context, pretty unsuccessful