this was a good review if the laptops have the same battery capacity, then a good methodology might be to measure how much work they can output on a charge before they power off You just need some measure of work for the different use cases. I can only think of FPS, off the top of my head
Since I don't game, I'll take power efficiency, especially idle efficiency. I'd like to leave a laptop untouched and unplugged for a few days, then come back with the battery at almost the same level. Like what Qualcomm achieved, but without the incompatibility issues.
3:45 It's a bit misleading to say it's entirely on 4nm when most of the actual cores are on 3nm. Zen 5c is manufactured on TSMC N3E. 1/3 of the cores is on N4P, and 2/3 of the cores is on N3E but I/O is also on older node, so just like previous Intel chips it's more like an average node.
I'm using a Macbook Air M2, but I want to play Zenless Zone Zero, so I'm curious to see how the two CPUs compare. How much is the frame rate difference?
@@NasiLemakTech HX 370 and 375 only differ on their NPU. However, 288V is not out yet, and even if it does it will be like 30% more expensive than 258V. It's much more rational to compare based on price.
Looks like the 288V was a paper launch. It's a cherry picked 258V, which Intel sent out to reviewers only. So far there are no 288V laptops in the market.
Lunar Lake has RAM on Package so in reality AMD will consume 2 to 3 watts more than Intel while gaming including RAM.
so maximum TPD is 25w
@vokhanhtoan7623 yes bro
And Lunar Lake also fixed the RAM amount and speed.
Unfortunately Intel said it's a once-off thing. Not gonna happen for the next generation
@@NasiLemakTechwhich is pretty stupid
this was a good review
if the laptops have the same battery capacity, then a good methodology might be to measure how much work they can output on a charge before they power off
You just need some measure of work for the different use cases. I can only think of FPS, off the top of my head
Thank you for your comparison, it helps me alot!
I am hesitating between these two laptops
Since I don't game, I'll take power efficiency, especially idle efficiency. I'd like to leave a laptop untouched and unplugged for a few days, then come back with the battery at almost the same level. Like what Qualcomm achieved, but without the incompatibility issues.
Intel's new Lunar Lake is your new best friend!
Seriously, the chip is crazy efficient
3:45 It's a bit misleading to say it's entirely on 4nm when most of the actual cores are on 3nm.
Zen 5c is manufactured on TSMC N3E. 1/3 of the cores is on N4P, and 2/3 of the cores is on N3E but I/O is also on older node, so just like previous Intel chips it's more like an average node.
Naming their cpu AI is a major ick ngl
I'm using a Macbook Air M2, but I want to play Zenless Zone Zero, so I'm curious to see how the two CPUs compare. How much is the frame rate difference?
You'll lose a lot of performance through the multiple layers of emulation and translation.
I really don't advise to do so
I know that HX370 limits the CPU to 28W, what is the maximum power of Ultra 7 258V in Zenbook?
~27W.
Not sure if the SoC wattage from HWinfo is the entire SoC only or the entire SoM with the RAM modules.
Still, i will choose amd over intel all day every day
That's what fanboing means
battery comparison is unfair because 16in screen uses more battery than 14in screen
@@vokhanhtoan7623
But AMD laptop has bigger BATTERY and less resolution.
Same resolution sir lmao
@@NasiLemakTechBut if SMT is turned off on the Hx 370, will it optimize power usage more?
@@NasiLemakTech Hi Sir, but its not just the resolution, bigger screen means additional LED for brightness.
@@DipSet85 as explained in the video. It's not a 1:1 comparison for the battery life.
this is unfair comparison, we should compare tier to tier
AI 9 HX 370 vs Core Ultra 9 288V
AI 7 360 vs Core Ultra 7 258V
and dont count intel tdp include ram and wifi, so the cpu use much less power than amd
Why would 288V be compared with HX 370? Should be compared to HX 375.
@@NasiLemakTech HX 370 and 375 only differ on their NPU.
However, 288V is not out yet, and even if it does it will be like 30% more expensive than 258V.
It's much more rational to compare based on price.
Looks like the 288V was a paper launch. It's a cherry picked 258V, which Intel sent out to reviewers only. So far there are no 288V laptops in the market.