I was thinking that too but it's probably because the dad is the one making 'offers' so he made himself responsible for the damage. Not a lawyer just an avid watcher so that's my guess lol but I bet she could've went after the 19yo if she wanted to but dad's richer lol
@@jennifercowley8970, You're exactly right. The father is on the deed as the owner and therefore also on the insurance for the property. If someone does damage to another person's property while at your property or is hurt on your property, you as the property owner are responsible for all damages. She sued the parents who can legally turn around and sue their children, but we all know they are the type of people that don't think they should be held accountable for anything they or their children do so that will never happen. Heck, they probably went home and told their kids to do it again, just not in front of the cameras, lol. They just strike me as that kind of parents.
The defendants are have no problem with their sons actions. They are actually trying to shift the problem to the building owner, as if it is she who is a problem. I hate how the mother is defensive since her son had damaged the property, both parents should have the son take responsibility.
The audacity of the defendants, omg. Their adult son and friend are shooting a potentially deadly weapon. They are lucky an animal or human wasn't hurt or killed.
The arrogance of the Defendants was so so so cringey. Dad is asked why his 19yrld kid is shooting arrows at someone's property: "THERE WAS NO ONE IN THE BUILDING 🤷♀️" Mom sees video evidence of her 19yrld kid damaging property: "OUR PRIVACY IS INVADED!" Mom hears there's 15 holes, instead of two: "WHERE'S THE VIDEO EVIDENCE?!" Dad's opinion of the $200 estimate to fix damages: "I COULD DO IT MYSELF, I WOULD NEED $1 TO $5 PER HOLE 🤷♀️" Dad right before he exists: "IF I WAS YOUNGER I WOULD SUE FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR VIDEO RECORDING LOL" 🙈 Mom is major Karen and Dad thinks he's some hot stuff and a professor of construction 🙄
3:38 Crazy defendant woman is complaining that 'she's recording her kids'. First off woman... they are ADULTS. Secondly, the cameras are on HER PROPERTY. Thirdly, your little darlings were doing damage.
This is a case of spoiled teenagers not being held accountable for their careless acts. The parents think it's OK but it wouldn't be okay if it was there property. This is why a generation don't apologized, or take accountability for there actions, and feel privileged. Parents like this.
The defendants are idiots, and if the plaintiff was walking in her own side alley and they shot the arrow and it hit her, would they still say they have the right to shoot arrows through her fence. And why wasn't their son present, after all he is an adult and should have been held responsible...
That’s why he’s a POS because his parents keep sticking up for him and find no wrong with anything he does. And they want the camera moved so the son can keep acting like an idiot and there’s no proof. My mother would have whipped my behind and then she would have made me apologize.
My mother wouldn't even let me HAVE a bow and arrow, much less aim it at something that's not a target made for such things! The closest I got to using a bow and arrow was in summer camps archery class, and we had a bullseye to aim at.
My dad made me work a whole summer to pay back for the window I broke at our granny's house. I hated every second of it.... But a lesson was learned and I was very careful after that. I was 11.
Im 55 i remember when i was in elementary school age ,maybe about 10 my dad gave me a bow ,recurve style and made arrows foe me out of spruce just to play with in our neighborhood...i used to play all day long in the public park and never had any incident with anyone ... and i lived in a large Canadian city.
She won't be moving that camera. It captures more of her property than the corner of his place. That's just the shape of the video. OH WELL. Dill with it.
What nasty defendants! They are the type of people that will say, or do absolutely anything to avoid their responsibility, and instead try and make the plaintiffs feel like they did something wrong by having video evidence. What shameful people!! of course they want her to remove the camera, that way the next time the kids damage to property they won’t have evidence.
Those young men saw that they'd damaged the property, and they chose to continue doing more damage. If they do anything like that again, call the cops instead of the parents. They need to learn that they're responsible for their actions, and their parents don't help in that respect.
I agree; the 19yo is lucky the property owner didn't skip the civil suit and go directly to the criminal complaint, especially when it became clear that no one else felt it was a problem. The offense was clear and blatant, definitely not an accident. For his own good and the good of society, the 19yo should have faced consequences for his stupidity and lack of integrity.
@@21johnja yes-but this isn’t a homeowner’s insurance issue. The parents’ insurance wouldn’t cover this, I’m pretty sure. The damage didn’t even happen on their property. I’m not sure why the plaintiff was able to sue the parents rather than the son.
It’s a property issue. It really doesn’t matter who shot the arrow. An object was allowed to leave their property and enter the neighbours properly and cause damage. Same thing if it was a leaking water pipe on their side or a tree that fell on the neighbours building or a dog that escaped and caused damage. In this case an arrow left their property and caused damage to another. So you sue the property owner.
The property owner is free to sue the person who fired the arrow. Ie his son. But they won’t. One thing that was clear is they don’t teach their sons accountability - just like they tried to avoid accountability.
Ok so first of all, as an experienced archer: shooting an arrow in itself is NOT a felony. However, archers are responsible for every arrow they shoot. You never aim an arrow somewhere you wouldn’t want to shoot or damage. The video speaks volumes: defendants need to be responsible for their son’s dangerous habits. Archery is a sport that utilizes a potentially dangerous weapon. You can kill or seriously injure someone easily if you aren’t safe. This son needs to get a legit target, a backstop, and stop damaging other people’s property. Judge is right - the kid is being a pinhead.
Targets and backstop, warning signs and aiming into their own property and away from anywhere with a landscape gardener, resident or pedestrian! Lucky no-one was seriously injured by these buffoons.
I had an ex who used to shoot a bow in the backyard. He did put hay bails behind it. However, in our city, firing a bow was considered discharging a firearm. He only didn't get caught because it's quiet. I fought with him about it, but it was his ticket to get, so I lost. But a lot of cities, it's illegal to fire a bow in a populated area.
These kids never heard of a bullseye target?? Sometimes at one house, family members do target practice with freaking GUNS and they don't aim at the house or the wall/fence/etc! Pretty sure they aim at a target or a tree...I can't stand the noise so I stay inside when they do it, and therefore don't know what they're aiming at. What I do know is that it's in the middle of nowhere, so no nearby houses would get hit.
Why is nobody talking about the fact the father is in the backyard doing something in the garden behind the boys as they’re actually shooting the arrows!
That was not an accident once is it could have been an accident but when you go back to do it again it's not an accident if I were to judge I would side with the plaintiffs
The son shoots arrows at another person house, he's caught on tape, and these narcissists are fighting about it! GEEZ! I think pops should've chosen retiring instead of having another kid.
Do you ever wonder what the defendants think of the situation once they have some time away and then see themselves on video? Do they get how irresponsible their reaction is? For $200 bucks! Sheesh.
The plaintiff SHOULD call the police and have the adult BRATS charged with vandalism, at LEAST. That defendant mother is what is wrong with the world today: ENTITLEMENT and NO RESPONSIBILITY or CONSEQUENCES!!!. The defendants should be HAPPY that the plaintiff didn't have their adult kids arrested! They were not aiming for the fence.
By the time some of those papers make it to her she is already processing a ton of info and is understandable that she is on a roll and cant stop to think about thanking every single time. He passes papers like 10 times per case so yeah she always says thank you at least on the very first.
That's great that her daughter left a note, but doesn't she always get upset when people leave the scene of an accident? She says it's a crime. But still, it's good she left a note.
19 years old, causing damage on other people's property and has his enabling parents, to show their faces in court and pay, instead of him? Yeah I can see he is working to become entitled just like many of the young people today! 😒
Some cities have ordinances which require certain requirements for target shooting with any weapon. If you’re outside city limits then your only requirement is to watch what direction you’re shooting because you’re responsible for any damage to life and livestock. So yes, if you want to shoot a gun in your backyard then you can as Lon as you know the laws. If you want to practice with a bow and arrow then use arrows with changeable arrowheads and use ones with suction cup or magnet ends. Same with darts.
I think that's the REAL problem the plaintiff's have here. Its not about the money to repair a couple of dents in the siding. Its the PRINCIPLE of the matter, because they CAUGHT these boys, RED-HANDED, no less, shooting arrows into the siding of their newly refurbished building. The two boys DO NOT apologize for what they did. They DO NOT try to make it right with the plaintiffs. Instead, their Mom is calling the plaintiff a liar and saying PROVE IT, that my precious baby did this to your building and Dad is saying he will fix it because he wants to be cheap and not pay $200 to have it done PROPERLY and he's whining about the lady's cameras recording part of his back yard. And they can't even be bothered to bring their child to court to teach him the lesson of "Don't damage someone else's property. Instead, they are mollycoddling him and making excuses and trying to fix the problem FOR HIM when the lady has it on video tape, plain as day, that these two little archers are damaging her property MULTIPLE TIMES. I'd be angry too. That is NOT teaching your son integrity, madam.
Warner Bros has announced that The People's Court and Judge Mathis have been canceled. Series finale has yet to be announced. Sad day, Judge Milian is a force of nature, especially during the golden years of the show.
I can just imagine the parents at his murder trial, saying he's just a boy, he didn't do anything that bad. Terrible parents to a spoiled brat man baby
Oof that mom 🙄 and him there’s no one in that building smh. What if there was what if someone got hurt what are they gonna say next they shouldn’t have sat so close to the window. Ugh these people raising an arrogant man child for sure.
He may have worked in contracting on his but that doesn't mean he is licensed bonded and insured. What if he fixed it wrong? She has recourse against your contractor's license and insurance if it's fixed incorrectly.
I remember when I hit a parked car in the parking lot and left a note on their car. There was a superficial scratch on their car so I thought nothing of it. When my insurance Co called me talking about they're going to pay $1000+ for the repairs I just about fainted. I vowed never to leave a note the next time shall that happen again🥴🤷🏿♀️
Why is not the 19 year old paying for the damages. He can work now. Parents who beat their children are the same as these type of parents. Spoiling your son equals to ruining his soul. I hope he grows up and realizes how life works before is too late.
Archery is a safe sport when done responsibly. Why else would it be in the Olympics? This is a stupid kid who got hold of a potential weapon and acted stupidly unsafe. He could have done it with knives or axes if he really wanted to. It has way more to do with the kid than the sport.
$200 to repair someone’s fence that your kid damaged, isn’t unreasonable. Also, why wasn’t the 19 year old sued in the first place?
I was thinking that too but it's probably because the dad is the one making 'offers' so he made himself responsible for the damage. Not a lawyer just an avid watcher so that's my guess lol but I bet she could've went after the 19yo if she wanted to but dad's richer lol
Probably bc the father is the property owner. He is responsible for what happens on his property.
@@YashaHika is
@@jennifercowley8970, You're exactly right. The father is on the deed as the owner and therefore also on the insurance for the property. If someone does damage to another person's property while at your property or is hurt on your property, you as the property owner are responsible for all damages. She sued the parents who can legally turn around and sue their children, but we all know they are the type of people that don't think they should be held accountable for anything they or their children do so that will never happen. Heck, they probably went home and told their kids to do it again, just not in front of the cameras, lol. They just strike me as that kind of parents.
Parents are the problem... Ignorantly Enabling the man child they call their "kid". God help us.
Absolutely.
I love that term man child wow our society is in trouble.
The defendants are have no problem with their sons actions. They are actually trying to shift the problem to the building owner, as if it is she who is a problem. I hate how the mother is defensive since her son had damaged the property, both parents should have the son take responsibility.
These elderly parents have no sense of responsibility and pass this attitude on to their 19-year-old son. 👎
When pple have kids later in life and lose perspective on how things work with kids
The audacity of the defendants, omg. Their adult son and friend are shooting a potentially deadly weapon. They are lucky an animal or human wasn't hurt or killed.
Yes, they should have been charged for vandalism and wreckless endangerment.
Parents like these raise irresponsible and negligent children. I wish they'd had to give her more.
Hold your sons accountable for their actions!!! They do something wrong then make them fix it or pay for it. Simple.
The arrogance of the Defendants was so so so cringey.
Dad is asked why his 19yrld kid is shooting arrows at someone's property: "THERE WAS NO ONE IN THE BUILDING 🤷♀️"
Mom sees video evidence of her 19yrld kid damaging property: "OUR PRIVACY IS INVADED!"
Mom hears there's 15 holes, instead of two: "WHERE'S THE VIDEO EVIDENCE?!"
Dad's opinion of the $200 estimate to fix damages: "I COULD DO IT MYSELF, I WOULD NEED $1 TO $5 PER HOLE 🤷♀️"
Dad right before he exists: "IF I WAS YOUNGER I WOULD SUE FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR VIDEO RECORDING LOL"
🙈
Mom is major Karen and Dad thinks he's some hot stuff and a professor of construction 🙄
I hope she sees this and realizes the other woman is `10x more beautiful AND mature."
😂😂😂
Interesting that the "children" weren't shooting at targets toward their own house.
3:38 Crazy defendant woman is complaining that 'she's recording her kids'. First off woman... they are ADULTS. Secondly, the cameras are on HER PROPERTY. Thirdly, your little darlings were doing damage.
This is a case of spoiled teenagers not being held accountable for their careless acts. The parents think it's OK but it wouldn't be okay if it was there property. This is why a generation don't apologized, or take accountability for there actions, and feel privileged. Parents like this.
Grateful we still get to watch Peoples Court 🙏🏼 I watch this show every single day!
The defendants are idiots, and if the plaintiff was walking in her own side alley and they shot the arrow and it hit her, would they still say they have the right to shoot arrows through her fence. And why wasn't their son present, after all he is an adult and should have been held responsible...
They said he was working...yeah right!
That’s why he’s a POS because his parents keep sticking up for him and find no wrong with anything he does. And they want the camera moved so the son can keep acting like an idiot and there’s no proof. My mother would have whipped my behind and then she would have made me apologize.
And then watched the video.😁
My mother wouldn't even let me HAVE a bow and arrow, much less aim it at something that's not a target made for such things!
The closest I got to using a bow and arrow was in summer camps archery class, and we had a bullseye to aim at.
My dad made me work a whole summer to pay back for the window I broke at our granny's house. I hated every second of it.... But a lesson was learned and I was very careful after that. I was 11.
Those shoulderless blouses always look horrible and trashy.
I was surprised she wore that to court.
Definitely
I love when they have a video and don't shut up so that she can watch.
Two 19 year old kids would be splitting the bill would have never made it to court if this was my children
5:18 The father is IN THE VIDEO!!! He knew what they were doing!
Why weren’t the adult son held responsible
If the parents were smart they would make the son pay.
Because he’s a boy mentally, not a man.
@@PhoenixHinds So you’re saying they won’t make them pay? lol
Son was not held accountable because these parents are USELESS
@@PhoenixHinds Thats what I was questioning. Why are not they (Parents) making him pay?
If there was an ordinance against filming from your own property, that would violate the first amendment of the constitution.
4:15 What about using a BACKSTOP??? DUH. These little darlings are too dumb to have bow and arrow.
I love rewatching this case. I love how the plaintiffs have all the evidence (especially the video) and deserves their win.
Toxic enabling parents. He's legally an adult, so why isn't he there
Those parents are doing their son a disservice
Absolutely!
Im 55 i remember when i was in elementary school age ,maybe about 10 my dad gave me a bow ,recurve style and made arrows foe me out of spruce just to play with in our neighborhood...i used to play all day long in the public park and never had any incident with anyone ... and i lived in a large Canadian city.
She won't be moving that camera. It captures more of her property than the corner of his place. That's just the shape of the video. OH WELL. Dill with it.
What nasty defendants! They are the type of people that will say, or do absolutely anything to avoid their responsibility, and instead try and make the plaintiffs feel like they did something wrong by having video evidence. What shameful people!! of course they want her to remove the camera, that way the next time the kids damage to property they won’t have evidence.
These parents need to take control of their son. He is an adult.
8:14 KOREKT!!!
DEFENDANTS ARE A SORRY EXCUSE FOR PARENTS AND HUMAN BEING...THE APPLE NEVER FALLS FAR...HE WILL HAVE A NUMBER SOON...REAL TALK!!!
I’m so used to hearing “Thankkkk you, Douglas”
He’s 19, why are they suing the parents & not the 19 y/o?
I remember this one, it’s great when there’s video clearly showing what happened. Why would you go to court. Lmao
Of course she can have that camera. She could have it pointing directly into their yard and it wouldn't be illegal.
Those young men saw that they'd damaged the property, and they chose to continue doing more damage. If they do anything like that again, call the cops instead of the parents. They need to learn that they're responsible for their actions, and their parents don't help in that respect.
I agree; the 19yo is lucky the property owner didn't skip the civil suit and go directly to the criminal complaint, especially when it became clear that no one else felt it was a problem. The offense was clear and blatant, definitely not an accident. For his own good and the good of society, the 19yo should have faced consequences for his stupidity and lack of integrity.
The guy thinks he’s still in Outer Slobovia?
Wack
Apparently, the defendants would have no problem if their house was shot with arrows.
Why wasn't the 19 year old sued? He is an adult.
I never understood this when it first aired but why is she suing the parents of the 19 YEAR OLD I mean HES 19 he's a adult in the eyes of the law
It happened on the parents property. She has the homeowners insurance
@@21johnja yes-but this isn’t a homeowner’s insurance issue. The parents’ insurance wouldn’t cover this, I’m pretty sure. The damage didn’t even happen on their property. I’m not sure why the plaintiff was able to sue the parents rather than the son.
It’s a property issue. It really doesn’t matter who shot the arrow. An object was allowed to leave their property and enter the neighbours properly and cause damage. Same thing if it was a leaking water pipe on their side or a tree that fell on the neighbours building or a dog that escaped and caused damage. In this case an arrow left their property and caused damage to another. So you sue the property owner.
The property owner is free to sue the person who fired the arrow. Ie his son. But they won’t. One thing that was clear is they don’t teach their sons accountability - just like they tried to avoid accountability.
@@daymonnin that wouldn't be smart because 19 year olds have no money
Judge should know and tell defendants that the cameras are completely constitutionally protected. 🙃
The defendants are OUT OF THIS WORLD!
Wear actual sleeves to court.
Ok so first of all, as an experienced archer: shooting an arrow in itself is NOT a felony. However, archers are responsible for every arrow they shoot. You never aim an arrow somewhere you wouldn’t want to shoot or damage.
The video speaks volumes: defendants need to be responsible for their son’s dangerous habits.
Archery is a sport that utilizes a potentially dangerous weapon. You can kill or seriously injure someone easily if you aren’t safe. This son needs to get a legit target, a backstop, and stop damaging other people’s property. Judge is right - the kid is being a pinhead.
Targets and backstop, warning signs and aiming into their own property and away from anywhere with a landscape gardener, resident or pedestrian! Lucky no-one was seriously injured by these buffoons.
@@michelehemlokhexwhite4310 agreed. Every safety precaution needs to be adhered to. If they can’t they should find an archery range nearby to go to.
The wife of the defendent is a piece of work. Down-right nasty and soo cold. She took zero accountability for anything!
Did he say “she get so hot, so wet”? What am I missing here?? 😂😂😂😂
Lol probably nothing 😂
He definitely said that, lol I just heard it now! 😳
There are shooting ranges for this. It should never be shot outside of a shooting range
And this is why we have so many young people walking around with no accountability! Look who’s raising them 🤦🏾♂️
Guns or Arrows/Bows require blank space behind or adequate back stops to stop the wayward missiles. 👍🏼
You can see the mom & dad in the background watching them shooting..lol
I bet if someone broke into her home through the back door she would be begging for any footage.
Shut it lady!! Shut it ok!!
No wonder why the adult son is how he is. He needed to be fought some integrity and respect.
I had an ex who used to shoot a bow in the backyard. He did put hay bails behind it. However, in our city, firing a bow was considered discharging a firearm. He only didn't get caught because it's quiet. I fought with him about it, but it was his ticket to get, so I lost. But a lot of cities, it's illegal to fire a bow in a populated area.
These parents took no responsibility for their children
These kids never heard of a bullseye target??
Sometimes at one house, family members do target practice with freaking GUNS and they don't aim at the house or the wall/fence/etc! Pretty sure they aim at a target or a tree...I can't stand the noise so I stay inside when they do it, and therefore don't know what they're aiming at. What I do know is that it's in the middle of nowhere, so no nearby houses would get hit.
Why is nobody talking about the fact the father is in the backyard doing something in the garden behind the boys as they’re actually shooting the arrows!
No thank you Douglas?? Rude 🤣
That was not an accident once is it could have been an accident but when you go back to do it again it's not an accident if I were to judge I would side with the plaintiffs
Yeah, not an accident. I thought the same thing!
The son shoots arrows at another person house, he's caught on tape, and these narcissists are fighting about it! GEEZ! I think pops should've chosen retiring instead of having another kid.
Do you ever wonder what the defendants think of the situation once they have some time away and then see themselves on video? Do they get how irresponsible their reaction is? For $200 bucks! Sheesh.
Parents like these raise kids that can do no wrong in their eyes
The plaintiff SHOULD call the police and have the adult BRATS charged with vandalism, at LEAST. That defendant mother is what is wrong with the world today: ENTITLEMENT and NO RESPONSIBILITY or CONSEQUENCES!!!. The defendants should be HAPPY that the plaintiff didn't have their adult kids arrested! They were not aiming for the fence.
Sir your curtains and blinds should be closed, anyway, if you're walking around naked within view of someone else. Just stop 😂😂😂
Mrs. Defendant is a real charmer. Come to America and be the neighbor from hell. No freakin' gratitude.
"Integrity", case closed.
I really dislike when judge Milan doesn’t say “thank you”’ to Douglas… 😒
By the time some of those papers make it to her she is already processing a ton of info and is understandable that she is on a roll and cant stop to think about thanking every single time. He passes papers like 10 times per case so yeah she always says thank you at least on the very first.
That's great that her daughter left a note, but doesn't she always get upset when people leave the scene of an accident? She says it's a crime. But still, it's good she left a note.
These are the worst parents in the world who don't punish their kids ...that's why their kid is 19 and shooting arrows !!!
These defendants are ridiculous. They are lucky their sons didn’t seriously hurt someone.
They must constantly get their kid out of trouble…..because they FEEL he does nothing wrong.
The mother got a sour face the whole time.. even the father made a joke & laughed
19 years old, causing damage on other people's property and has his enabling parents, to show their faces in court and pay, instead of him? Yeah I can see he is working to become entitled just like many of the young people today! 😒
Some cities have ordinances which require certain requirements for target shooting with any weapon. If you’re outside city limits then your only requirement is to watch what direction you’re shooting because you’re responsible for any damage to life and livestock. So yes, if you want to shoot a gun in your backyard then you can as Lon as you know the laws. If you want to practice with a bow and arrow then use arrows with changeable arrowheads and use ones with suction cup or magnet ends. Same with darts.
I think that's the REAL problem the plaintiff's have here. Its not about the money to repair a couple of dents in the siding. Its the PRINCIPLE of the matter, because they CAUGHT these boys, RED-HANDED, no less, shooting arrows into the siding of their newly refurbished building. The two boys DO NOT apologize for what they did. They DO NOT try to make it right with the plaintiffs. Instead, their Mom is calling the plaintiff a liar and saying PROVE IT, that my precious baby did this to your building and Dad is saying he will fix it because he wants to be cheap and not pay $200 to have it done PROPERLY and he's whining about the lady's cameras recording part of his back yard. And they can't even be bothered to bring their child to court to teach him the lesson of "Don't damage someone else's property. Instead, they are mollycoddling him and making excuses and trying to fix the problem FOR HIM when the lady has it on video tape, plain as day, that these two little archers are damaging her property MULTIPLE TIMES. I'd be angry too. That is NOT teaching your son integrity, madam.
Should have the brat arrested!
Anyone know what that male plaintiff was carrying??
14:34 🤣🤣🤣 I lost it
😂 wanted to see who would post this 😂
The plaintiff brought her book club with her
ajajajajaja
Warner Bros has announced that The People's Court and Judge Mathis have been canceled. Series finale has yet to be announced. Sad day, Judge Milian is a force of nature, especially during the golden years of the show.
She has a new show! sigh….
Bow and arrows, slingshots, fireworks are all regulated in many areas.
These 2 parents disgust me, now its invasion of privacy.
Make the disrespect Son pay 💰
What are the parents going to say if someone gets shot by their son's arrow? "It's their fault for walking in front of him!"? It wouldn't surprise me.
Omg. J.m. 4got to say "thsnk you Douglas"
I can just imagine the parents at his murder trial, saying he's just a boy, he didn't do anything that bad. Terrible parents to a spoiled brat man baby
Those parents are so obnoxious
I understand how the kids don’t care after listening and watching the parents.SMH
We have archery ranges in public parks, so clearly your backyard is allowed. Common sense is need to avoid accidents obviously
Oof that mom 🙄 and him there’s no one in that building smh. What if there was what if someone got hurt what are they gonna say next they shouldn’t have sat so close to the window. Ugh these people raising an arrogant man child for sure.
He may have worked in contracting on his but that doesn't mean he is licensed bonded and insured. What if he fixed it wrong? She has recourse against your contractor's license and insurance if it's fixed incorrectly.
I remember when I hit a parked car in the parking lot and left a note on their car.
There was a superficial scratch on their car so I thought nothing of it. When my insurance Co called me talking about they're going to pay $1000+ for the repairs I just about fainted.
I vowed never to leave a note the next time shall that happen again🥴🤷🏿♀️
Lmao
The defendants are some of the worst kind of parents 😡😡😡😡
If this loose parenting is normal in their culture then move back to your culture.
WoW how old his the father “Grandfather”❓
How can the dad be held responsible tho when the "kds" are 19??
Why is not the 19 year old paying for the damages. He can work now.
Parents who beat their children are the same as these type of parents. Spoiling your son equals to ruining his soul.
I hope he grows up and realizes how life works before is too late.
Equating spoiling to physical abuse is REDICULOUS
The parents….👎😵💫🤯🤔😳😖
I would be so sad that I've moved and these scum bags are my neighbours.
I believe it should be illegal. That thing could put someone's eye out. Smh
An arrow can do more than put an eye out, it can kill...
Hahaha. Steak knives should be banned too. They can literally cut you into pieces!
Archery is a safe sport when done responsibly. Why else would it be in the Olympics? This is a stupid kid who got hold of a potential weapon and acted stupidly unsafe. He could have done it with knives or axes if he really wanted to. It has way more to do with the kid than the sport.
Dude, this ain't Europe. Keep ur clothes on 🙄
Is that man been on the sopranos?
I’m sad our tax money is being used on this type of case