@@Financebroz1 no, it’s implied that it is in good repair if the tenant signs the lease to agree the same. The obligation is on the tenant to prove the condition prior to signing the lease.
This seems slightly carte Blanche What about the implications or Section 18? Proudfoot v hart? Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar? Diminution in reversionary interest? Any potential HoTs agreed with a new tenant?
Thank you for your comment. There is only so much we can put in a short video, and can’t possibly cover all dilaps issues in 15-20mins. We have not covered Scott’s schedules, surveyor negotiations, s18 limbs etc etc, all topics for future videos.
I'm a final year building surveying student and this video gives me PTSD from my law module haha!
At 5.20.. keep in good repair.. should the item be in good repair prior to the tenant obligation ?
@@Financebroz1 no, it’s implied that it is in good repair if the tenant signs the lease to agree the same. The obligation is on the tenant to prove the condition prior to signing the lease.
9:04 How do you know the cost of repair? By referencing prev jobs? or you have quotations from contractors?
@@___Q-bot all sorts of ways. BCIS, contractors pricing, previous prices etc. it’s a start for negotiations.
This seems slightly carte Blanche
What about the implications or Section 18?
Proudfoot v hart?
Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar?
Diminution in reversionary interest?
Any potential HoTs agreed with a new tenant?
Thank you for your comment. There is only so much we can put in a short video, and can’t possibly cover all dilaps issues in 15-20mins. We have not covered Scott’s schedules, surveyor negotiations, s18 limbs etc etc, all topics for future videos.