in India also there's a system of titles in rulers first comes Raja ( King ) then Maharaja ( A great king ) and even greater is Samrat ( Similar to Emperor ) and then the greatest is Chakravartin Samrat ( A universal ruler )
The Grand Duchy of Finland was actually larger than the United Kingdom (not counting the colonies) and it should be called grand principality instead of grand duchy. In Finnish it's "suuriruhtinaskunta", "ruhtinas" means a reigning prince and "suuriruhtinas" means a grand prince. But for some reason it's usually known as grand duchy in English.
@@TomasFuk-vi4dc It's actually a very interesting and often neglected topic, since A LOT if not most of the "popular" historical movies are made in anglo-saxons countries (mostly USA, UK) these movies are more likely to become popular because of the English language being worldwide or the influence of Hollywood. You add the fact that cinema producer mostly look for "cool" stuff to their movies and not historical accuracy, and it give the perfect anglo-saxons historical movie full of historical clichée and missinformations and since these movies underrate the historical aspect to overrate the action and "coolness" they end up becoming popular and peoples do the mistake to learn from movies instead reliable official sources, and this is how the majority of the population have a "movieish" view of history. Shaped mostly by anglo-centric films. But i am aware that not every anglo-saxons movie are inacurrate, some of them are very well made.
0:25 Actually, the title of Tsar (spelled Czar in older English sources) is more in line with that of a king than an emperor. The title itself is derived from the word Caesar (yes, word, which itself is derived from Julius Caesar’s name) which was used by heirs apparent to the Roman throne or by junior co-emperors in the late Roman period. The title was officially changed during the reign of Peter I, who abandoned the title in favor of the Russian Император (imperator), the direct translation of the Roman word. This is also why the monarchs of modern Bulgaria (Ferdinand I, Boris III and Simeon II, the last of whom is still alive) were referred as Tsars of Bulgaria and no one batted an eye. The use of the title Tsar was a colloquialism used to refer to the Russian monarch after Peter the Great because the title had become so attached to the image of the Russian monarchy.
Pretty anglo-centric which is not really fitting, they are a lot of things you could say about emperor and if you want to talk about nobility go back to the carolingian empire because that’s where all those modern title come from, not england
in India also there's a system of titles in rulers
first comes Raja ( King )
then Maharaja ( A great king )
and even greater is Samrat ( Similar to Emperor )
and then the greatest is Chakravartin Samrat ( A universal ruler )
The Grand Duchy of Finland was actually larger than the United Kingdom (not counting the colonies) and it should be called grand principality instead of grand duchy. In Finnish it's "suuriruhtinaskunta", "ruhtinas" means a reigning prince and "suuriruhtinas" means a grand prince. But for some reason it's usually known as grand duchy in English.
You need to remember that grand duke was equal to grand prince in Russia at the time
Pretty anglo-centric, but also nice video.
A lot of "historical" videos are made by anglo-saxons and thus anglo-centric without even them being aware of it....
Tell me about that.
@@TomasFuk-vi4dc It's actually a very interesting and often neglected topic, since A LOT if not most of the "popular" historical movies are made in anglo-saxons countries (mostly USA, UK) these movies are more likely to become popular because of the English language being worldwide or the influence of Hollywood. You add the fact that cinema producer mostly look for "cool" stuff to their movies and not historical accuracy, and it give the perfect anglo-saxons historical movie full of historical clichée and missinformations and since these movies underrate the historical aspect to overrate the action and "coolness" they end up becoming popular and peoples do the mistake to learn from movies instead reliable official sources, and this is how the majority of the population have a "movieish" view of history. Shaped mostly by anglo-centric films.
But i am aware that not every anglo-saxons movie are inacurrate, some of them are very well made.
0:25 Actually, the title of Tsar (spelled Czar in older English sources) is more in line with that of a king than an emperor. The title itself is derived from the word Caesar (yes, word, which itself is derived from Julius Caesar’s name) which was used by heirs apparent to the Roman throne or by junior co-emperors in the late Roman period. The title was officially changed during the reign of Peter I, who abandoned the title in favor of the Russian Император (imperator), the direct translation of the Roman word. This is also why the monarchs of modern Bulgaria (Ferdinand I, Boris III and Simeon II, the last of whom is still alive) were referred as Tsars of Bulgaria and no one batted an eye. The use of the title Tsar was a colloquialism used to refer to the Russian monarch after Peter the Great because the title had become so attached to the image of the Russian monarchy.
Not Really
@ Didn’t ask you, nitwit
Imperially/Royally styled:His/Her majesty
Imperial rulers:Emperor/ress
Royal rulers
King/Queen
Chieftain/ess
P/Matrician
Alpha/Luna
Northeast african
Caliph/a
Pharaoh/Queen
Sultan/a
1:12 "wearing crowns"
*Only european monarchy thatbhas no crowns*
Nobly styled:Our lord/lady
Noble leaders:
Duke/chess
Marquess/chioness
Earl/Count/ess
Viscount/ess
Baron/ess
Nobles:Peer/ess
Great and Informative Video!
Imperially/Royally styled:His/Her highness
Imperials/Royals:
Crown prince/ss
Prince/ss
Page/Dame
Lord/Lady
Sultan???
I think I know another famous dux 💀
Ty so much
So Tsar/Tsarina count?
Tsar is analog to emperor, because in pre-imperial Russia great prince was analog to king and prince was analog to duke.
Tsar isn’t only emperor the Tsardom of Bulgaria such as Boris IlI was a king
4:36 OSTLAAAAND.
Europe is funny
Where is Sultan and caliph
and khans
I think the video meant European noble titles
How about rajas and wangs
Pretty anglo-centric which is not really fitting, they are a lot of things you could say about emperor and if you want to talk about nobility go back to the carolingian empire because that’s where all those modern title come from, not england
grand duke came to be for lithuanians first
My crush is a princess