A marquess, being the ruler of a border region, has the authority to call up troops without seeking royal consent first. For this reason, the title went only to someone trusted by the monarch.
Thanks for including the three types of Queens. I get so tired of people saying " Camilia isn't a Queen she is Consort" its ridiculous. She is the Queen.
I think what people meant by Queen was Queen regnant,that is a queen who is a ruler/monarch in her own right like Elizabeth II, whereas Camilla is a Queen consort, a Queen with no political rights and only a spouse of a King. Because Elizabeth II has ruled UK for so long, people tend to get confused over stuff like this.
@@SweeterThanFiction.She does not rule, even though she is equal to King Charles in terms of position (and styled as Her Majesty) she is not a “ruler”, shes only a consort: a spouse. Thats why Prince Phillip is a Prince Consort because he was the husband of the late Elizabeth II, he does not possess the right to rule. Exception can be made if the current monarch was sick or was an infant, then a Queen consort/mother can rule on behalf of the monarch but will be called as Queen Regent, not Queen regnant. Camilla is the Queen of the UK regardless of what people said (i dont like her but we cant fight actual facts)
The Grand Duchy of Finland was actually larger than the United Kingdom (not counting the colonies) and it should be called grand principality instead of grand duchy. In Finnish it's "suuriruhtinaskunta", "ruhtinas" means a reigning prince and "suuriruhtinas" means a grand prince. But for some reason it's usually known as grand duchy in English.
@@williemherbert1456 Actually the title of Grand Duke only became a thing during the GDL. Before that Lithuanian rulers were often just called "Dukes" and more often Kings and sometimes even Emperors (Algirdas was named one during a letter by the Patriarch of Constantinople.). To the people of the time there was no such thing as a GDL, it was just called "Lithuania".
Archduke is a title that has been reserved only historically in Austria. Also, literally every Habsburg Austrian had the title of Archduke. The Emperor often held the title of Archduke as well.
So the Mushroom Kingdom is actually a principality since Peach is a princess not a queen. Just like the Spanish Empire's ruler is a king not an emperor.
Prince comes from the Latin Princeps which was another title the Roman emperors used and was originally used in wales to show supremacy over the welsh kings but then got demoted when English took over. it was originally meant to be emperor. And this is my ted talk on why the mushroom kingdom is an empire not a kingdom.
The Mushroom Kingdom should be called the Mushroom Empire because of the vast regions it controls, from dense jungles to arid badlands. Even the dark and gloomy volcanic worlds where bowser usually resides in is technically still part of the Mushroom Kingdom, bowser just invaded it and took residence there. Plus Princeps was used to also address emperors in the Roman Empire so it could be something where the term princeps never lost its prestige of meaning emperor.
in India also there's a system of titles in rulers first comes Raja ( King ) then Maharaja ( A great king ) and even greater is Samrat ( Similar to Emperor ) and then the greatest is Chakravartin Samrat ( A universal ruler )
In the Philippines, before the Spanish came. The title of a Visayan king is datu (diyan for queen) but for emperor who rules a much larger area, they are called rajah (hara for empress), but in Luzon, the ruler is called lakan (no female equivalent), it maybe because only males can inherit such position.
0:25 Actually, the title of Tsar (spelled Czar in older English sources) is more in line with that of a king than an emperor. The title itself is derived from the word Caesar (yes, word, which itself is derived from Julius Caesar’s name) which was used by heirs apparent to the Roman throne or by junior co-emperors in the late Roman period. The title was officially changed during the reign of Peter I, who abandoned the title in favor of the Russian Император (imperator), the direct translation of the Roman word. This is also why the monarchs of modern Bulgaria (Ferdinand I, Boris III and Simeon II, the last of whom is still alive) were referred as Tsars of Bulgaria and no one batted an eye. The use of the title Tsar was a colloquialism used to refer to the Russian monarch after Peter the Great because the title had become so attached to the image of the Russian monarchy.
@ Not really. Pretty much all of the Roman emperors actually used it as part of their name, which they often changed when they ascended the throne. It wasn’t a title so much as an assumed legal name. The formally was general “Imperator Caesar [name] Augustus” (which essentially translates as “the one who commands Casaer [name], the majestic one”), but it really started being used as an actual *title* following the 3rd Century Crisis.
@@TomasFuk-vi4dc It's actually a very interesting and often neglected topic, since A LOT if not most of the "popular" historical movies are made in anglo-saxons countries (mostly USA, UK) these movies are more likely to become popular because of the English language being worldwide or the influence of Hollywood. You add the fact that cinema producer mostly look for "cool" stuff to their movies and not historical accuracy, and it give the perfect anglo-saxons historical movie full of historical clichée and missinformations and since these movies underrate the historical aspect to overrate the action and "coolness" they end up becoming popular and peoples do the mistake to learn from movies instead reliable official sources, and this is how the majority of the population have a "movieish" view of history. Shaped mostly by anglo-centric films. But i am aware that not every anglo-saxons movie are inacurrate, some of them are very well made.
Thank you! I'm currently in the process of making more videos for other noble titles since there are so many. This one was meant to be mainly Anglo centric. It was my fault for not titling correctly.
In german, the word "Prince" translates to "Fürst" as well to "Prinz". Prinz = Son of a monarch, Fürst (related to the english word "first") = Ruler of a principality. The "Prince of Wales" is often mistranslated to "Prinz von Wales", although "Fürst von Wales" would be more accurate. It's quite interesting that the english language has only one word for both titles. It's also interesting that most noble titles were used for military leaders or adminstrators and later became heredetery. The german word "Graf" (count) dirived from the byzantine "Grapheus" which translates to "scribe" which shows it's usage for regional administrators, quite similar to the anglo-saxon ealdorman.
Great video, but the Lords and Knights are also consideres as part of the Nobility, but they are name as Low Nobility, without very significante titles and with little lands (normally was a little fort and the land around It, sometimes a village or town) or not even lands and just status as concilers or knights. Also, the rank of Castellan, it's not a noble title, but often they make it to enter Into the low nobility as a knight below the orders of a Lord, keeping a castle on his name.
I wonder king and archduke do both have their own power and authority on the land they're responsible for and does king have the power to operate archduke or both are same power ?
Read the book and thought I understood it from a psychological perspective maybe even from the philosophical perspective_ but now,after watching this movie I feel confused_ now I have to go back to read the book again
a grand duke wasn't a king not because the area he ruled was quite small (Lithuanian was the biggest country in Europe once, but it was still a duchy, not a kingdom), but rather those titles were appointed by the pope and not all gained his trust and leniency (true for only Christian countries). Though even when Lithuania was a third of it's maximum size and wasn't Christian, they had a king.
Maria Theresia wasn´t an Empress. Technically only her husband Franz I. Stephan was Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, because its constitution doesn´t allow woman to bear the title. So Maria Theresia was "only" Archduchess of Austria and Queen of Hungary.
Pretty anglo-centric which is not really fitting, they are a lot of things you could say about emperor and if you want to talk about nobility go back to the carolingian empire because that’s where all those modern title come from, not england
I have the blood of the marquess of barbacena from the empire of Brazil in my veins, sadly, i only have documents, some papers and old stuff, no recognition, no power, i only shows the documents to my friends, now in this republic i have nothing but what my family built on its own, its depressing to be honest, i wish i could use cool clothes, help the people...
What if the title "President" is a noble title? How would democracy change And how would this "Noble President" title be kept without having some political dynasty and still align with democratic virtues
Well, Sultan and King has no significant difference between them, they're ruling a Kingdom or Sultanate. Sultan ruling a Sultanate is using the Islamic law or Sharia. While King ruling a Kingdom can be use by both Muslim or non Muslim countries, and the law edicts by King is more secular than Sultan does. The Ottoman Emperor has its own name, called as Padishah. The word Padishah were from Persian language rather than Turkish, and Padishah means "Emperor" And Shah means King. Same as Amir/Duke, Sheikh/Count. While Archduke in Islamic Nation were often unknown. The word Caliph also slightly different from Emperor. The Emperor is ruling a vast nation within 1 realm, and he is a ruler of the Empire. While Caliph or Khalifa is more like the highest political and religious authority in the Islamic nation aka the Head of Faith same as the Papal State ruled by the Pope and is considered as the highest religious figurehead in Catholic Christians. Unlike the Pope, the title Caliph was often used by the biggest Islamic Empire or Sultanate claiming the protectors of Islamic Realm, so they act as Empire and Caliph at the same time. Ex : Ottoman, Abbasid, Ummayad.
Tbh the whole king and queen they dont really do laws and tax and what not thats mainly parliment 😂😂 the king just has to show his face and to sign a few papers and if he doesnt parliment will just ignore and just go ahead without him signing 😂😂 .
It was holy(close to the Papacy), It was Roman(Controlled Rome for a while and were, as said, close to the Papacy) And it was certainly a Empire, just a very, very decentralized on
A marquess, being the ruler of a border region, has the authority to call up troops without seeking royal consent first. For this reason, the title went only to someone trusted by the monarch.
I am descendent of the marquess of barbacena from the Empire of Brazil, i didnt know my ancestors could do that, oh, i wish the monarchy camr back!
@@joaoguilherme9034Aw hell naw bruh 😭
Thanks for including the three types of Queens. I get so tired of people saying " Camilia isn't a Queen she is Consort" its ridiculous. She is the Queen.
I think it depends on where she rules. But Buckingham Palace confirmed that she is to be called Queen Camilla
I think what people meant by Queen was Queen regnant,that is a queen who is a ruler/monarch in her own right like Elizabeth II, whereas Camilla is a Queen consort, a Queen with no political rights and only a spouse of a King. Because Elizabeth II has ruled UK for so long, people tend to get confused over stuff like this.
@@SweeterThanFiction.She does not rule, even though she is equal to King Charles in terms of position (and styled as Her Majesty) she is not a “ruler”, shes only a consort: a spouse. Thats why Prince Phillip is a Prince Consort because he was the husband of the late Elizabeth II, he does not possess the right to rule. Exception can be made if the current monarch was sick or was an infant, then a Queen consort/mother can rule on behalf of the monarch but will be called as Queen Regent, not Queen regnant. Camilla is the Queen of the UK regardless of what people said (i dont like her but we cant fight actual facts)
i already hate you
@@s0neskim People actually say she isn't a "Queen," when in fact she is *The* Queen.
The Grand Duchy of Finland was actually larger than the United Kingdom (not counting the colonies) and it should be called grand principality instead of grand duchy. In Finnish it's "suuriruhtinaskunta", "ruhtinas" means a reigning prince and "suuriruhtinas" means a grand prince. But for some reason it's usually known as grand duchy in English.
You need to remember that grand duke was equal to grand prince in Russia at the time
Same, don't forget that Grand Duchy of Lithuania is one of the largest land power in Europe at 14th century.
my man how on earth did you guys create such a cursed word "suuriruhtinaskunta"
@@varimatra2088 well, the Finnish language is really weird. That's just what our language is like :D.
@@williemherbert1456 Actually the title of Grand Duke only became a thing during the GDL. Before that Lithuanian rulers were often just called "Dukes" and more often Kings and sometimes even Emperors (Algirdas was named one during a letter by the Patriarch of Constantinople.). To the people of the time there was no such thing as a GDL, it was just called "Lithuania".
Archduke is a title that has been reserved only historically in Austria. Also, literally every Habsburg Austrian had the title of Archduke. The Emperor often held the title of Archduke as well.
So the Mushroom Kingdom is actually a principality since Peach is a princess not a queen. Just like the Spanish Empire's ruler is a king not an emperor.
Prince comes from the Latin Princeps which was another title the Roman emperors used and was originally used in wales to show supremacy over the welsh kings but then got demoted when English took over. it was originally meant to be emperor. And this is my ted talk on why the mushroom kingdom is an empire not a kingdom.
The Mushroom Kingdom should be called the Mushroom Empire because of the vast regions it controls, from dense jungles to arid badlands. Even the dark and gloomy volcanic worlds where bowser usually resides in is technically still part of the Mushroom Kingdom, bowser just invaded it and took residence there. Plus Princeps was used to also address emperors in the Roman Empire so it could be something where the term princeps never lost its prestige of meaning emperor.
in India also there's a system of titles in rulers
first comes Raja ( King )
then Maharaja ( A great king )
and even greater is Samrat ( Similar to Emperor )
and then the greatest is Chakravartin Samrat ( A universal ruler )
If I am not mistaken, Samrat Ashoka 'The Great' Maurya was the only one to actually take that title, right?
In the Philippines, before the Spanish came. The title of a Visayan king is datu (diyan for queen) but for emperor who rules a much larger area, they are called rajah (hara for empress), but in Luzon, the ruler is called lakan (no female equivalent), it maybe because only males can inherit such position.
@@gorcin7075some other Indian rulers like Chandragupta Muryan and Gupta rulers are also considered to be Chakravartin Samrat
Khmer Emperors were actually Chakravatin.
Yes. His full title was *Piyadasi Devanampiya Chakravartin Samrat Ashok* @@gorcin7075
0:25 Actually, the title of Tsar (spelled Czar in older English sources) is more in line with that of a king than an emperor. The title itself is derived from the word Caesar (yes, word, which itself is derived from Julius Caesar’s name) which was used by heirs apparent to the Roman throne or by junior co-emperors in the late Roman period. The title was officially changed during the reign of Peter I, who abandoned the title in favor of the Russian Император (imperator), the direct translation of the Roman word. This is also why the monarchs of modern Bulgaria (Ferdinand I, Boris III and Simeon II, the last of whom is still alive) were referred as Tsars of Bulgaria and no one batted an eye. The use of the title Tsar was a colloquialism used to refer to the Russian monarch after Peter the Great because the title had become so attached to the image of the Russian monarchy.
Not Really
@ Didn’t ask you, nitwit
Caesar was a title held by the emperor of rome I'm pretty sure
@ Not really. Pretty much all of the Roman emperors actually used it as part of their name, which they often changed when they ascended the throne. It wasn’t a title so much as an assumed legal name. The formally was general “Imperator Caesar [name] Augustus” (which essentially translates as “the one who commands Casaer [name], the majestic one”), but it really started being used as an actual *title* following the 3rd Century Crisis.
:/
I like that Viscount has the eye of Saron
What’s that?
Nobly styled:Our lord/lady
Noble leaders:
Duke/chess
Marquess/chioness
Earl/Count/ess
Viscount/ess
Baron/ess
Nobles:Peer/ess
And then you have king
The title of grand duke already existed for lithuanians, and some grand duchies were actually bigger than kingdoms/empires.
Pretty anglo-centric, but also nice video.
A lot of "historical" videos are made by anglo-saxons and thus anglo-centric without even them being aware of it....
Tell me about that.
@@TomasFuk-vi4dc It's actually a very interesting and often neglected topic, since A LOT if not most of the "popular" historical movies are made in anglo-saxons countries (mostly USA, UK) these movies are more likely to become popular because of the English language being worldwide or the influence of Hollywood. You add the fact that cinema producer mostly look for "cool" stuff to their movies and not historical accuracy, and it give the perfect anglo-saxons historical movie full of historical clichée and missinformations and since these movies underrate the historical aspect to overrate the action and "coolness" they end up becoming popular and peoples do the mistake to learn from movies instead reliable official sources, and this is how the majority of the population have a "movieish" view of history. Shaped mostly by anglo-centric films.
But i am aware that not every anglo-saxons movie are inacurrate, some of them are very well made.
Thank you! I'm currently in the process of making more videos for other noble titles since there are so many. This one was meant to be mainly Anglo centric. It was my fault for not titling correctly.
@@MrBowtie2345 No problem. Looking forward to the other video.
whenever I forget the term when reading manhwa, I go here
7:27 Love the Skyrim referance
I hope you make a video about tittles in our current world and what kind of people we have
Not sure if it should be included but Jarl is around the power of a duke
Great, informative video!
Is Archduke on the same standing as King? If so, what is the difference between the two?
In german, the word "Prince" translates to "Fürst" as well to "Prinz". Prinz = Son of a monarch, Fürst (related to the english word "first") = Ruler of a principality. The "Prince of Wales" is often mistranslated to "Prinz von Wales", although "Fürst von Wales" would be more accurate. It's quite interesting that the english language has only one word for both titles. It's also interesting that most noble titles were used for military leaders or adminstrators and later became heredetery. The german word "Graf" (count) dirived from the byzantine "Grapheus" which translates to "scribe" which shows it's usage for regional administrators, quite similar to the anglo-saxon ealdorman.
Pretty far unrelated but will you do one about ancient Persian titles?
Of course!
Never expected to see chad Jarl Balgruuf of Whiterun here
Great and Informative Video!
Great video, but the Lords and Knights are also consideres as part of the Nobility, but they are name as Low Nobility, without very significante titles and with little lands (normally was a little fort and the land around It, sometimes a village or town) or not even lands and just status as concilers or knights. Also, the rank of Castellan, it's not a noble title, but often they make it to enter Into the low nobility as a knight below the orders of a Lord, keeping a castle on his name.
Dude, make a video about military ranks.
Of course!
The marquess of Sade had authority to whip and train his servants. Truly a royal duty
I wonder king and archduke do both have their own power and authority on the land they're responsible for and does king have the power to operate archduke or both are same power ?
Its the same just depends what nation, kings existed anywhere where it was a kingdom, archduke only found its place in Austria -hugarian empire
What about Hospodar or voievoda?
THANKS A LOT
By the way title isn't only based on land but also recognition of your power and on what the church titled you
Read the book and thought I understood it from a psychological perspective maybe even from the philosophical perspective_ but now,after watching this movie I feel confused_ now I have to go back to read the book again
Thank you for this, but what about Counts and Countesses? Are they just below Viscounts?
Imperially/Royally styled:His/Her highness
Imperials/Royals:
Crown prince/ss
Prince/ss
Page/Dame
Lord/Lady
a grand duke wasn't a king not because the area he ruled was quite small (Lithuanian was the biggest country in Europe once, but it was still a duchy, not a kingdom), but rather those titles were appointed by the pope and not all gained his trust and leniency (true for only Christian countries). Though even when Lithuania was a third of it's maximum size and wasn't Christian, they had a king.
I would of expected the title of "Pharaoh" to also have it's own segment in the video. Or did I miss it in an equivalent title?
4:36 OSTLAAAAND.
Where are the Baronets and the Baronetess???
I mean no sh!t that Marquess is late addition to an island kingdom, like the brits
Ty so much
Wait doesn't that mean QEII and KCIII are actually emperor? Or was their 'emperor'ness invalid since the implementation of "commonwealth"?
You forgot Crown Prince & Crown Princess.
Maria Theresia wasn´t an Empress. Technically only her husband Franz I. Stephan was Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, because its constitution doesn´t allow woman to bear the title. So Maria Theresia was "only" Archduchess of Austria and Queen of Hungary.
Thank you for labelling Camilla as Consort
Your pronunciation needs significant improvement.
I never made the connection between the term Prince/Princess and Principality
There's no relation about the size of the territory and the rank of the title.
Pretty anglo-centric which is not really fitting, they are a lot of things you could say about emperor and if you want to talk about nobility go back to the carolingian empire because that’s where all those modern title come from, not england
100%. I'll be making further videos on other Noble titles in different cultures.
I have the blood of the marquess of barbacena from the empire of Brazil in my veins, sadly, i only have documents, some papers and old stuff, no recognition, no power, i only shows the documents to my friends, now in this republic i have nothing but what my family built on its own, its depressing to be honest, i wish i could use cool clothes, help the people...
What about Kaiser?
"Kaiser" is "emperor" in German( It comes from Caesar, the title of emperor that came from Julius Caesar).
@ thanks
So Tsar/Tsarina count?
Tsar is analog to emperor, because in pre-imperial Russia great prince was analog to king and prince was analog to duke.
Tsar isn’t only emperor the Tsardom of Bulgaria such as Boris IlI was a king
Princess Charlene is not the ruler of Monaco. Her husband, Prince Albert II is. Charlene is the Princess Consort.
What about lords
Lord is a generic term for nobles from Baron/Baroness up to Duke/Duchess. Any of these might rightly be referred to as Lord X or Lady Y.
Archdukey
franz joseph was an emperor and not an archduke his brother was archduke
It's not "sea-nut" but "ca-noot" for cnut the great
What if the title "President" is a noble title? How would democracy change
And how would this "Noble President" title be kept without having some political dynasty and still align with democratic virtues
Its would look like a elective monarchy where everybody could a ruler
I think I know another famous dux 💀
The DVX 💀
Saluto al duce
Imperially/Royally styled:His/Her majesty
Imperial rulers:Emperor/ress
Royal rulers
King/Queen
Chieftain/ess
P/Matrician
Alpha/Luna
Northeast african
Caliph/a
Pharaoh/Queen
Sultan/a
5:13 given that it is French the word is pronounced mar-key
My crush is a princess
Cyning was pronounced more like ku ning, definitely not signing😅
Why did the British have an Empire but not an Emperor?
Good video, make muslim nobility too❤
Sultan?
Sultan is often equal to King, but in some case it different like Ottoman Empire was led by a Sultan.
Sultan???
No one cares
This video only explained the European nobilities.
Emperor/ King
Where is Sultan and caliph
and khans
I think the video meant European noble titles
How about rajas and wangs
Well, Sultan and King has no significant difference between them, they're ruling a Kingdom or Sultanate. Sultan ruling a Sultanate is using the Islamic law or Sharia. While King ruling a Kingdom can be use by both Muslim or non Muslim countries, and the law edicts by King is more secular than Sultan does. The Ottoman Emperor has its own name, called as Padishah. The word Padishah were from Persian language rather than Turkish, and Padishah means "Emperor" And Shah means King. Same as Amir/Duke, Sheikh/Count. While Archduke in Islamic Nation were often unknown. The word Caliph also slightly different from Emperor. The Emperor is ruling a vast nation within 1 realm, and he is a ruler of the Empire. While Caliph or Khalifa is more like the highest political and religious authority in the Islamic nation aka the Head of Faith same as the Papal State ruled by the Pope and is considered as the highest religious figurehead in Catholic Christians. Unlike the Pope, the title Caliph was often used by the biggest Islamic Empire or Sultanate claiming the protectors of Islamic Realm, so they act as Empire and Caliph at the same time. Ex : Ottoman, Abbasid, Ummayad.
@@Emperorchoochoo then what about russian tsars
*cyning
Is pronounced with 'k' sound
It's close to the German word for king
1:12 "wearing crowns"
*Only european monarchy thatbhas no crowns*
Isn't that Belgium?
@milkomobil oh idk, I just know Spanish monarchy doesn't has crown nor is ordained to god ever since 1200ish
grand duke came to be for lithuanians first
I am reichking
Tbh the whole king and queen they dont really do laws and tax and what not thats mainly parliment 😂😂 the king just has to show his face and to sign a few papers and if he doesnt parliment will just ignore and just go ahead without him signing 😂😂 .
Wow, Einstein, really?
Holy roman empire wasn't holy was barely roman and not an empire
All AI generated low life
Yeh I think it's pretty obvious this is AI generated
@ Talking about most of the images, not the voice
Europe is funny
4:36 ostland 😮
Sheikh, Raja, Tsar, Khan, Sultan, Oba, Eze, Caliph, Emir, Maharaja, Shogun, Daimyo, Asantehene, Negus, Inkosana, Ajaw, Khagan, etc. other cultures exist outside Europe 😮💨
All in good time friend 😉
terrible pronunciation of "cyning"
Sining 🤣
'Cyning'is pronounced 'Küning'. Not 'signing'😂 does this guy know about phonetics in middle and old English?
Holy roman emperor:
-Wasn't holy
-Wasn't roman
-wasn't a EMPIRE
Gosh please we need these to be fixed, it's at the start fo the video damnit!
It was holy(close to the Papacy), It was Roman(Controlled Rome for a while and were, as said, close to the Papacy)
And it was certainly a Empire, just a very, very decentralized on
Cyning is pronounced koning not signing