Half the things this automated voice is saying doesn't make any sense It just said, nuclear missiles have been shipped to Belarus to warn Poland that they support. that they support Ukraine.??!! What are you talking about? Russia gave the nuclear weapons to Belarus against Ukraine, not for Ukraine. And why the hell are you even talking about Poland?? 24 seconds into this video, and I already realised this video has been written by AI. and has no idea what the hell is going on. Hopefully youtubes Fixes this, otherwise nobody's going to be watching anything on this. thing on this site in the years to come if it's just all artificially. produced content that doesn't even have any linkage with reality
Here's the problem with the F-22 that you haven't mentioned: because of it's absurd cost, less than 200 of them were ever built since it's introduction 26 years ago. That means spare parts and maintenance are also ridiculously expensive. Where as the much younger and newer F-35 platform has already gone into full mass production with over 1000 units shipped. And because it can be exported to allied states, the F-35 is also considerably more affordable. I'm actually surprised they ordered another refit for the F-22. Nostalgia is a powerful thing.
The 15EX accompanied by drone wingmen and come on, how many raptors do you need to take on the crap it's flying against. You can't kill what you can't see. That said, my uncle worked for Oliver North in the Reagan administration. He had such a high clearance and would disappear for up to 5 years at a time. No word of when or where no contact. He got cancer in 2015. Days before he passed, he said if the US let's the world know about or see something we have in our arsenal. Just know we have things 50-150 years more advanced the world doesn't know about. I used to beg him to give me Info on Area51. He would swear it didn't exist. We knew years later it did. He also said that the universe and the world is a more amazing and scary place than I could ever imagine. He said he's said more than he ever swore or thought he would. He said I took an oath one I take very seriously and have said too much already. He said in my kids & their kids' generation, likely we will know more of what he hinted at. 🛸👽. So I'm not worried that we don't have a few thousand raptors. The damage the few hundred we have and how hard it's keeping people in check as is is proof positive enough for me as well..
That's crazy, the F-35 has been a disaster and blown over 20 billion dollars just in development, with production costs now more than the original Raptor, and it's an inferior fighter. How many Raptors could they have built with that?
@@blucat4 It is true that the F-35 development was troublesome and way over budget. That does not change the fact the production models are now significantly cheaper to build and maintain. Much of the technology used in F-22 was built into the F-35 platform, but with significant upgrades like modularization and part interchangeability between variants. As beautiful as a machine the F-22 is, it was ultimately a failure. You don't send a Ferrari to the front lines.
@@OdinReactor It wasn't a failure, at all. There is still nothing as good which is why they are going back to it. As far as costs go, it was worth 95 million at the time. Current F-35s are 109 million, which maybe is a bit cheaper considering inflation. But not considerably cheaper as you said. The F-22 was indeed not built with part changeability in mind, that's true. What they should have done instead of pitted Lockheed Martin against Boeing for a new first strike fighter, was design a new F-22, basically the same, but with more common parts and modularisation, adding new computer software, stealth etc, bring it into the 21'st century. And saved the cost of the First Strike Fighter program, and the attempts to fix the F-35, as I said, save 20 billion. They are doing that now anyway, the First Strike Fighter program was a bureaucratic mistake, wasting time and money. imho! 😄🙂
Over priced, unreliable 33% air worthy, not stealthy against Russian and British radars exercise Red Flag over Navada a few years ago 2x Typhoons flew in from England on Super Cruise without refuelling... Engaged F-22's at 24 miles and got the kills. The new Meteor BVR AA's using active microwave seekers. And the Russians have much better kit than we do...!! The SU-57 out classes the F-22 in every spec except for length of time it spends getting fixed. And before you arm chair engineers start yapping, read the specs of the new Saturn Izdelie 30 engine... 18% more power yet drops 6 tons of weight and adds flat nozzles and the turbine blades are radar shielded.
Lmao pretty much nothing you said is true. And even if it were, there was 22 SU 57 until a couple days ago when at least 1 maybe 2 taken out by drone at airfield. In 15 years, yall made 22 lmao. We retired 32 out of like 210 . So, you were a bit off.......that's 85% "air worthy". The red flag drills are literally meant to put them in disadvantaged positions and see hoe they respond. The typhoon is a very capable aircraft and got a few kills within visual range.....so what's your point? You realize the fact you are bringing up that they were able to record a handful of kills instead of jusg getting blitzed at nil worka against your argument right? Then you outtrd yourself as a Russian farm bot with the "and we know RU kit is always much better". LMAO you say this as you are arguing whether your latest greatest barely a 5th gen jet is better than our 30 year old tech which we A. don't even produce anymore and are getting ready to retrofit and B.already been replaced by a new jet That's embarrassing Sergei. Embarrassing.
@@scottnunan4927 Jeff Hawley asked point blank in a senate hearing how many F-22 can be fielded today... 34% - 36%. I think that blows one hole in your response. No I am not a Russian bot, but I am able to look at everything from a null stand point. The F-22 looks great, in it’s marketing material but the Northrop YF-23 was the better plane. That’s why the Japanese are building it and seeing the mock-up of the new BAE Tempest #2, I suspect Britain are using it too. Although knowing the idiots we have in charge it won’t be getting 8th Generation Engines. Yes 8th. ua-cam.com/video/kdNUFaNEDAc/v-deo.html Another great British invention handed over to you Americans probably in another dirty under the table deal. Part of my career was analysis and “blue sky development” not in fighter design but the concepting and analysis is the same for all projects. Joining the DOT’s, looking at the evidence the F-22 & F-35 especially the B, that is a YAK-141… And your going to get upset over this one Lockheed invested in it’s development and bought 2 air airframes and the technical data when the company went bust. The 2 airframes really are badly applied crap that are great for home defence because they need to be parked 50 yards from workshop facilities and access to spares. Russian kit has it’s faults, but it is designed for battlefields. Can a SU-57’s and SU-34’s use unprepared runways and compacted grass strips, YES. Before you launch US, RAF, Nato war planes ground crew clear the runway of debris, Russian kit simply close’s the intake doors and the engine breaths through it’s “gills” on the top side. Like it or not Russian kit is designed to fight in a War, US kit is designed to fight a WAR relying on intact infrastructure. Hopefully some of this may have sunk in. “das’vidania.”
@@HYL-c9z Russia has the same issue as Ukraine using the Challanger tank. The CH2 is an older design, if Russia captures one of these it's not going to learn a lot from it's targetting systems....but the construct of it's armour?? Britian is not shipping these tanks to Ukraine with the up-armour packs as those use the latest Dorchester (and at 88+ tons the bridges & mud are an issue) Even our Yankie cousins don't know whats in it. Quite surprising as our gov'unment can't be trusted with new toys.. Ex QinetiQ and some labour (democrat) scum bags who floated a public owned company selling off it's secrets to the US for half it's value.. But back on track, Russia has some very advanced tech despite what CNN & the BBC say. The SU-57's engine alone is years ahead of NATO design. Like Russian rocket/jet engines they had the advantage back min the 60's looks like they do again. The SU-57 also has 16 radars, yes 16 not only tied into the airframe but into a battlespace network. A Russian tank commander can directly high light/order an air strike on a target in minutes, the west can't do that the technology and chain of command does not support it. Simply it's keeping your best toys from falling into the hands of the play grounds worst bully. By that, Russia is not fighting NATO it's at war with those behind the governments with their own greedy agenda who don't give a toss how many die to make a buck or in this case a "shekel."
Two 👍👍 Up For The F-22 RAPTOR. 🇺🇸
The raptor will end up like the a-10... Used as long as possible
.
❤
The F22 has really not been tested in any combat situation. The closest it has come is being detected and tracked by a Turkish S400 radar system.
Lmao, maybe seen on radar but highly tracked.
@@TeeDee-j9u go and check the news articles on it, the F22 and F35 were tracked the whole way.
Oh...i am russian and i very shocked...
Just speechless here 😢
Why 47?
@@StevenHutsonJr.-jv4ur because with the way things are going, the war is not ending soon and innocent people are been k!lled on daily basis 😢😢.
NATO seems to be the problem 🙏🏽🇺🇸
😅
👍👍👍
Half the things this automated voice is saying doesn't make any sense It just said, nuclear missiles have been shipped to Belarus to warn Poland that they support. that they support Ukraine.??!! What are you talking about? Russia gave the nuclear weapons to Belarus against Ukraine, not for Ukraine. And why the hell are you even talking about Poland?? 24 seconds into this video, and I already realised this video has been written by AI. and has no idea what the hell is going on. Hopefully youtubes Fixes this, otherwise nobody's going to be watching anything on this. thing on this site in the years to come if it's just all artificially. produced content that doesn't even have any linkage with reality
Thank you u s a for helping those small and weak country, all of us. Warmly accept and support. You,
Big mistake
Western hype just 😅
Another annoying channel using “SHOCKED” in the titles of the videos. ANNOYING (all caps).
😂😂😂😂 The F-22 was shot down by a Mig-29! That is why Russia built the Su-57 and not the Mig-1.42! So the F-22 is hopeless!
No... it wasn't lol.
Really ?? I don't think so . Any proof ?
Here's the problem with the F-22 that you haven't mentioned: because of it's absurd cost, less than 200 of them were ever built since it's introduction 26 years ago. That means spare parts and maintenance are also ridiculously expensive. Where as the much younger and newer F-35 platform has already gone into full mass production with over 1000 units shipped. And because it can be exported to allied states, the F-35 is also considerably more affordable. I'm actually surprised they ordered another refit for the F-22. Nostalgia is a powerful thing.
Quizás no sepas F22 Hyperaptor upgrade 5.5 G búscala es impresionante viví en jacksonville base profundiza xq tendrá canon láser
The 15EX accompanied by drone wingmen and come on, how many raptors do you need to take on the crap it's flying against. You can't kill what you can't see.
That said, my uncle worked for Oliver North in the Reagan administration. He had such a high clearance and would disappear for up to 5 years at a time. No word of when or where no contact. He got cancer in 2015. Days before he passed, he said if the US let's the world know about or see something we have in our arsenal. Just know we have things 50-150 years more advanced the world doesn't know about. I used to beg him to give me Info on Area51. He would swear it didn't exist. We knew years later it did. He also said that the universe and the world is a more amazing and scary place than I could ever imagine.
He said he's said more than he ever swore or thought he would. He said I took an oath one I take very seriously and have said too much already. He said in my kids & their kids' generation, likely we will know more of what he hinted at. 🛸👽. So I'm not worried that we don't have a few thousand raptors. The damage the few hundred we have and how hard it's keeping people in check as is is proof positive enough for me as well..
That's crazy, the F-35 has been a disaster and blown over 20 billion dollars just in development, with production costs now more than the original Raptor, and it's an inferior fighter. How many Raptors could they have built with that?
@@blucat4 It is true that the F-35 development was troublesome and way over budget. That does not change the fact the production models are now significantly cheaper to build and maintain. Much of the technology used in F-22 was built into the F-35 platform, but with significant upgrades like modularization and part interchangeability between variants. As beautiful as a machine the F-22 is, it was ultimately a failure. You don't send a Ferrari to the front lines.
@@OdinReactor It wasn't a failure, at all. There is still nothing as good which is why they are going back to it. As far as costs go, it was worth 95 million at the time. Current F-35s are 109 million, which maybe is a bit cheaper considering inflation. But not considerably cheaper as you said. The F-22 was indeed not built with part changeability in mind, that's true. What they should have done instead of pitted Lockheed Martin against Boeing for a new first strike fighter, was design a new F-22, basically the same, but with more common parts and modularisation, adding new computer software, stealth etc, bring it into the 21'st century. And saved the cost of the First Strike Fighter program, and the attempts to fix the F-35, as I said, save 20 billion. They are doing that now anyway, the First Strike Fighter program was a bureaucratic mistake, wasting time and money. imho! 😄🙂
Over priced, unreliable 33% air worthy, not stealthy against Russian and British radars exercise Red Flag over Navada a few years ago 2x Typhoons flew in from England on Super Cruise without refuelling... Engaged F-22's at 24 miles and got the kills. The new Meteor BVR AA's using active microwave seekers. And the Russians have much better kit than we do...!! The SU-57 out classes the F-22 in every spec except for length of time it spends getting fixed. And before you arm chair engineers start yapping, read the specs of the new Saturn Izdelie 30 engine... 18% more power yet drops 6 tons of weight and adds flat nozzles and the turbine blades are radar shielded.
Lmao pretty much nothing you said is true. And even if it were, there was 22 SU 57 until a couple days ago when at least 1 maybe 2 taken out by drone at airfield. In 15 years, yall made 22 lmao.
We retired 32 out of like 210 . So, you were a bit off.......that's 85% "air worthy".
The red flag drills are literally meant to put them in disadvantaged positions and see hoe they respond. The typhoon is a very capable aircraft and got a few kills within visual range.....so what's your point? You realize the fact you are bringing up that they were able to record a handful of kills instead of jusg getting blitzed at nil worka against your argument right?
Then you outtrd yourself as a Russian farm bot with the "and we know RU kit is always much better". LMAO you say this as you are arguing whether your latest greatest barely a 5th gen jet is better than our 30 year old tech which we A. don't even produce anymore and are getting ready to retrofit and B.already been replaced by a new jet
That's embarrassing Sergei. Embarrassing.
@@scottnunan4927 Jeff Hawley asked point blank in a senate hearing how many F-22 can be fielded today... 34% - 36%. I think that blows one hole in your response. No I am not a Russian bot, but I am able to look at everything from a null stand point. The F-22 looks great, in it’s marketing material but the Northrop YF-23 was the better plane. That’s why the Japanese are building it and seeing the mock-up of the new BAE Tempest #2, I suspect Britain are using it too. Although knowing the idiots we have in charge it won’t be getting 8th Generation Engines. Yes 8th.
ua-cam.com/video/kdNUFaNEDAc/v-deo.html
Another great British invention handed over to you Americans probably in another dirty under the table deal.
Part of my career was analysis and “blue sky development” not in fighter design but the concepting and analysis is the same for all projects. Joining the DOT’s, looking at the evidence the F-22 & F-35 especially the B, that is a YAK-141… And your going to get upset over this one Lockheed invested in it’s development and bought 2 air airframes and the technical data when the company went bust. The 2 airframes really are badly applied crap that are great for home defence because they need to be parked 50 yards from workshop facilities and access to spares.
Russian kit has it’s faults, but it is designed for battlefields. Can a SU-57’s and SU-34’s use unprepared runways and compacted grass strips, YES. Before you launch US, RAF, Nato war planes ground crew clear the runway of debris, Russian kit simply close’s the intake doors and the engine breaths through it’s “gills” on the top side. Like it or not Russian kit is designed to fight in a War, US kit is designed to fight a WAR relying on intact infrastructure. Hopefully some of this may have sunk in. “das’vidania.”
so if the enemy have a better gunship, it's better to switch to a new gunship before the next engagement?
@@HYL-c9z Russia has the same issue as Ukraine using the Challanger tank. The CH2 is an older design, if Russia captures one of these it's not going to learn a lot from it's targetting systems....but the construct of it's armour?? Britian is not shipping these tanks to Ukraine with the up-armour packs as those use the latest Dorchester (and at 88+ tons the bridges & mud are an issue) Even our Yankie cousins don't know whats in it. Quite surprising as our gov'unment can't be trusted with new toys.. Ex QinetiQ and some labour (democrat) scum bags who floated a public owned company selling off it's secrets to the US for half it's value..
But back on track, Russia has some very advanced tech despite what CNN & the BBC say. The SU-57's engine alone is years ahead of NATO design. Like Russian rocket/jet engines they had the advantage back min the 60's looks like they do again.
The SU-57 also has 16 radars, yes 16 not only tied into the airframe but into a battlespace network. A Russian tank commander can directly high light/order an air strike on a target in minutes, the west can't do that the technology and chain of command does not support it.
Simply it's keeping your best toys from falling into the hands of the play grounds worst bully. By that, Russia is not fighting NATO it's at war with those behind the governments with their own greedy agenda who don't give a toss how many die to make a buck or in this case a "shekel."
Russia is weak and doesn't even compare to the US, cope wussy 😂