Motorweek Video of the 2007 Chrysler Sebring

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • Motorweek Video of the 2007 Chrysler Sebring - Check out more car reviews at www.motorweek.com - read honest reviews and check out specs sipsap.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @dkt1976dt
    @dkt1976dt 3 роки тому +1

    I love my 2007 Chrysler Sebring Touring with the 2.7 V6, I have just shy of 70,000 miles, the big thing with the 2.7 is frequent oil changes to prevent oil sludge.

  • @ousalsa
    @ousalsa 12 років тому +3

    Ive had mine since 2009 and put 75000 miles on it, totaling 125000 and only had general wear and tear replacements. Ie lights, bearings and sensors.
    For any vehicle follow the recommended servicing in the manual. especially PCV valve and air filters!
    Lastly there was a recall to fix the shifter! Take it in!

  • @jurkaa
    @jurkaa 6 років тому +3

    Well i have the 2007 sebring till today with 53000 miles on it, 2.4 liter 177hp, runs very well and the interior looks brand new, as i dont have leather seats which beat up after some time.

  • @chrysleristhebest1
    @chrysleristhebest1 12 років тому

    Honestly, its not as bad as everybody makes it out to be. I have one, and it certainly is not without its flaws. I have the Limited model so the interior isn't too bad, but there is still too much hard plastic. The 3.5L is great. The other engines suck though.

  • @michoacan684
    @michoacan684 14 років тому +1

    well i have a 2008 sebring and i really like the front but idont like the back

  • @9890jsp
    @9890jsp 11 років тому +5

    They're now owned by fiat and were previously owned my Mercedes and Mitsubishi.. I bet in 15 years they will dissolute.

  • @steveespinola7652
    @steveespinola7652 4 роки тому

    I lliked this car the only thing that did look weird were those stake designs on the hood I didn't really that ( it to them three years to realize that no one liked them to removed From the hood)

  • @tjw8t1
    @tjw8t1 Рік тому +1

    As someone who works on cars for a living, I should know these cars suck ass but I have always loved the quirky styling. They drive really nice and are comfortable on a long trip. Getting one with a 3.5 or a 200 with a 3.6 is the way to go, the 2.4 is good also but lacks power, and let's not even get started about the boat anchor 2.7L.

  • @alexanderunknown8605
    @alexanderunknown8605 21 день тому

    There are 2.7 with 6 speed tranny appeared later, and also there were 2.0 engines for EU fuel economists😂

  • @1Kinetic
    @1Kinetic 15 років тому +3

    The front is passable, but the whole ass end is shit.

  • @OrangeCrusader
    @OrangeCrusader 11 років тому +3

    I'm glad they're getting back on their feet now, this thing looked boring, drove boringly, and literally everything you can touch feels cheap and crappy, especially compared to any imports in its class.

  • @aayonce4
    @aayonce4 4 роки тому +1

    These were everywhere now i literally see none. Watch i see some after i post this comment .

    • @steveespinola7652
      @steveespinola7652 4 роки тому

      That's weird cause where I live I still see alot of these around.

    • @aayonce4
      @aayonce4 4 роки тому

      @@steveespinola7652 well where do you live?

    • @steveespinola7652
      @steveespinola7652 4 роки тому

      I live in Toronto, Canada and as I said I still see them around.

  • @bungusz
    @bungusz 4 роки тому +2

    I took a shit last night that's more interesting than this car

  • @Taureg96
    @Taureg96 14 років тому +2

    awful awful car