it's a shame not to include thread tool as part of standard package, it is only available as feature script. except this part i find onshape almost perfect.
Usless... Thread is not generated (so forget 3D printing) and also some standard thread pitches are missing for example for M42 thread 1mm pitch (standard photography) and 0.75mm (standard telescope). It's not possible to manually enter pitch but you need to chose from given ones.
Drawing to assist the machinest.... what decade are you in? Most modern automated machining is performed directly against a step file. Before a part gets anywhere near that, its overwhelmingly produced as a 3D printed prototype and this is precisely where onshape fails hard. The impact of rendering threads is also complete rubbish - the browser is hardware accelerated and the number of polygons introduced by a thread is sub 10,000. It simply smells of your code architecture not being optimized. Onshape is a great product, and a lot of us just want the basics fixed, but year after year you continue to ignore the customer experience requirement and continue to put out videos like this that just annoy people further. Do better Onshape.
Congrats to a great trolling for all us modeling for 3d printing
it's a shame not to include thread tool as part of standard package, it is only available as feature script. except this part i find onshape almost perfect.
i want real threads that i can 3d print!!!!
Yes!! Me too
Usless... Thread is not generated (so forget 3D printing) and also some standard thread pitches are missing for example for M42 thread 1mm pitch (standard photography) and 0.75mm (standard telescope). It's not possible to manually enter pitch but you need to chose from given ones.
Drawing to assist the machinest.... what decade are you in? Most modern automated machining is performed directly against a step file. Before a part gets anywhere near that, its overwhelmingly produced as a 3D printed prototype and this is precisely where onshape fails hard. The impact of rendering threads is also complete rubbish - the browser is hardware accelerated and the number of polygons introduced by a thread is sub 10,000. It simply smells of your code architecture not being optimized. Onshape is a great product, and a lot of us just want the basics fixed, but year after year you continue to ignore the customer experience requirement and continue to put out videos like this that just annoy people further. Do better Onshape.
I have a 6x20mm rectangle I extruded to 6mm. How do I edit the part to make it 30mm long, instead of 20mm?
Perfect