Think of how stupid the average person is... Then realise 50% of the world is more stupid than that. They chose to watch Marvel trash instead of this gem.
@@illastration1 ummmm marvel is still good. Everyone has tastes my dude. And thats ok. You shouldn't shame those with not as high standards as u. You sound pompous and douchey
I really like the Car Chase in the final parts of the movie, the way they move, how the water interacts with the cars, how the light interacts with the environment, it's extremely real.
That's a big fail for this video, the video shows it like its 100% computer models, this is the real production video ua-cam.com/video/sLxxbfsj8IM/v-deo.htmlsi=-tomE7f9DrJSZg1S
It's amazing how high quality the vfx in tv series are these days. I remember when I first watched Altered Carbon... great first season, but I was blown away that this was essentially a TV show. From the practical effects to the VFX.
@@faronomus1589 This video was posted before by another channel with the exact music, editing, and sequence exactly to this video maybe 2-3 years before this video came out. The other video was taken down (which didn't include a voiceover) and later this video was uploaded with a voiceover on top of the original video. The original was better, just the before and after reels without anyone talking over and was much less annoying (imo) without a narrator
I see your point, but i came to understand the pace worked for me ultimately as it built up the tension. Other big blockbuster films are too fast paced, showy, loud and in my face for my taste.
@@adib396somehow, slower paced films are more engaging than fast paced, non-stop action. I will fall asleep with those car racing, Godzilla, fighting, action hero movies. Give me 2001: A Space Odyssey any day and I am immersed, awash in a myriad of possibilities.
I imagine someday soon Joe Biden will have his digital double modeled with ZBrush and made virtual with Marvelous Designer for clothing, Painter for skin.
This video is very poorly done. The shots go by too quickly to process, we don't know what we're seeing until you move into the next shot, it's impossible to tell what's been added, there's no narration to explain what we're seeing, and the music track is overwhelming and distracting. Big thumbs down! Do better.
All those special effects were not enough to hit as hard as Blade Runner hit in 1982. Blade Runner 2049 was a run-of-the-mill movie, and it will be lost like tears in the rain.
@@galador8089 I don't care what the critics say. Blade Runner offered a lot of new topics in 1982 and Blade Runner 2049, on the contrary, offered nothing new but concepts that for the 2017 viewer were perfectly feasible. What the viewer saw in 1982 was... revolutionary. Blade Runner went down in cinema history, the 2017 version is a run-of-the-mill movie.
Problem was at the time it was a flop in 1982, it didn't hit hard until it gained a cult status audience when released to Laser Disc and Video tape and then only through that decade people began to see it as hard hitting. I had the film on video cassette etc...read the original Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (If you haven't read it I recommend it, different to the film but also new and interesting ideas...Mood Organs etc...) and unfortunately the spin off books. Also a good book to read on the first Blade Runner film is Future Noir by Paul M Sammon. I like the new Blade Runner film, for different reasons, perhaps as a sentimental homage.
@@adib396 That is true. If you were into science, technology and the philosophy of both, you understood the implications in 1982. People who lived thinking about something else were slow to realize it. And then there was the issue of the dark aesthetics of Blade Runner, which hit the hardest because you could see it directly . Like the aesthetics of the Matrix.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Truly amazing what they can do to the actor's face!
a timeless film thatis a crime it failed so hard financially
Worldwide box office 260 million, budget150million not too bad
Think of how stupid the average person is...
Then realise 50% of the world is more stupid than that.
They chose to watch Marvel trash instead of this gem.
@@illastration1 ummmm marvel is still good. Everyone has tastes my dude. And thats ok. You shouldn't shame those with not as high standards as u. You sound pompous and douchey
I really like the Car Chase in the final parts of the movie, the way they move, how the water interacts with the cars, how the light interacts with the environment, it's extremely real.
It was an unnecessary sequel, and an attempted cash-grab based on nostalgia.
So cool. Am really interested in doing all this
They created a ton of minitures for this film too.
That's a big fail for this video, the video shows it like its 100% computer models, this is the real production video
ua-cam.com/video/sLxxbfsj8IM/v-deo.htmlsi=-tomE7f9DrJSZg1S
We are not deserved this masterpiece !
Amazing! VFX is a metaverse
i love your channel
The first onze was amazing, the second one is excellent 🤟
I would like to see VFX from network TV shows rather than movies.
It's amazing how high quality the vfx in tv series are these days. I remember when I first watched Altered Carbon... great first season, but I was blown away that this was essentially a TV show. From the practical effects to the VFX.
Whatever happened to the original vid? Can you upload it somewhere? It was epic!!!
Freysa was a digital rendering of the actor without an eye? WTF. I never saw that!
I don't understand how do you turn 2:45 into this 2:47? There's just a one small part of green screen.
revolutionary
Hey can we get your earlier video, which was took off? Maybe a drive link or something, cause that was just epic!!
Yeah I am looking for the same thing
@@enda0man found anything yet?
@@apurvz5466 nope
You mean the one with just the music? I agree that was epic!
@@KiyokaMakibi yea it was. One of my daily routines at that time.
What about the Superman in 1978
Why the need to fake the thumbnail?..click bait!.?..
Intéressant
is it digital or analog??
digital
@@freetube3255 thank you. 😊😊
@@moritzstrohriegel8724 you are welcome!
Music name?
can i plz see creed how is it made
Please make the VFX vedio of BHAHUBALI Movie
You guys stole this video and just talked over it
Elaborate
@@faronomus1589 This video was posted before by another channel with the exact music, editing, and sequence exactly to this video maybe 2-3 years before this video came out. The other video was taken down (which didn't include a voiceover) and later this video was uploaded with a voiceover on top of the original video.
The original was better, just the before and after reels without anyone talking over and was much less annoying (imo) without a narrator
Cool
An interesting documentary, but I could do without the music ( if that’s what you call it )
The VFX was excellent, but the pace for the movie was too slow..
I see your point, but i came to understand the pace worked for me ultimately as it built up the tension. Other big blockbuster films are too fast paced, showy, loud and in my face for my taste.
@@adib396somehow, slower paced films are more engaging than fast paced, non-stop action. I will fall asleep with those car racing, Godzilla, fighting, action hero movies. Give me 2001: A Space Odyssey any day and I am immersed, awash in a myriad of possibilities.
No more Frank Lloyd Wright inspiration then 🤔
Wait a minute...Isn't the film real?
Rachel 3D is perfect.
Amazon prime The boys please
👀👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾🎬🎥🇧🇷😷
Fake FAME Focus. MOVIES NAME 3F.
Hi
hii
Impossible
Gravity
I imagine someday soon Joe Biden will have his digital double modeled with ZBrush and made virtual with Marvelous Designer for clothing, Painter for skin.
The music in this vid really put me off
like 1000
This video is very poorly done. The shots go by too quickly to process, we don't know what we're seeing until you move into the next shot, it's impossible to tell what's been added, there's no narration to explain what we're seeing, and the music track is overwhelming and distracting. Big thumbs down! Do better.
the music ruined your video
All those special effects were not enough to hit as hard as Blade Runner hit in 1982. Blade Runner 2049 was a run-of-the-mill movie, and it will be lost like tears in the rain.
Almost Every critic disagrees with you here. Many regard it as better than the original
@@galador8089 I don't care what the critics say. Blade Runner offered a lot of new topics in 1982 and Blade Runner 2049, on the contrary, offered nothing new but concepts that for the 2017 viewer were perfectly feasible. What the viewer saw in 1982 was... revolutionary.
Blade Runner went down in cinema history, the 2017 version is a run-of-the-mill movie.
Problem was at the time it was a flop in 1982, it didn't hit hard until it gained a cult status audience when released to Laser Disc and Video tape and then only through that decade people began to see it as hard hitting. I had the film on video cassette etc...read the original Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (If you haven't read it I recommend it, different to the film but also new and interesting ideas...Mood Organs etc...) and unfortunately the spin off books. Also a good book to read on the first Blade Runner film is Future Noir by Paul M Sammon. I like the new Blade Runner film, for different reasons, perhaps as a sentimental homage.
@@adib396 That is true. If you were into science, technology and the philosophy of both, you understood the implications in 1982. People who lived thinking about something else were slow to realize it. And then there was the issue of the dark aesthetics of Blade Runner, which hit the hardest because you could see it directly . Like the aesthetics of the Matrix.
Valiant effort but BR2049 still sucks compared to the original, and the digital Rachel looked horrible.
Shame the movie was complete shat and didn't need to exist
as someone who wasnt around to see the original i throughly enjoyed the sequal.