Happy Friday guys! Sorry for the late post, we are in Nashville right now and spent the day driving the new CR-V! Excited to share our thoughts on redesigned Sequoia, they should be going into production next month and in dealer lots shortly after that. We love how Toyota made it a hybrid, but do you think they should consider making a non-hybrid and a longer version?
Thanks for y’all’s hard work! Please tell me you aren’t staying at red roof or motel six. 🤣 edit. Did you look underneath at the exhaust? I’m wondering if they actually used a dual exhaust as most times one is cosmetic.
Before the debut, I was almost certain I was going to purchase a year 3 version of the new Sequoia. However, they compromised the cargo so badly that it's a deal breaker for me.
@@Lazylion572 The price you pay for fuel economy. I have a feeling this is the way going forward since something has to be sacrificed to make space for the batteries. I rather they did this than to make cheap thinner seats that allow you to fold flat and have miserable passengers on long road trips. Still pass for me, rather own a Sienna. Off-roading is the only plus on this.
@@PWCDN They had to do something. My '17 4Runner is at 16mpg highway. It's baaaaad, the Sequoia was worse. The Landcruiser priced itself out of the US market and this one is, too. $80K?????
@@TobyCostaRica not sure what the hell toyota was thinking. Second row is stationary but third row can slide back and forth. The second row will be used more than the third row. The option to adjust your seat is more crucial for the second row. This was a dumb decision.
GREATEST REVIEW so far! I went to see one today and I somewhat loved it. It stands bigger than it looks on the computer with a lot more tech than my older model. The deal breaker for me was the ridiculously smaller trunk space. The trunk is a lot narrower than the older model both vertically and horizontally due to the slightly oval shape of the upper entry part of the trunk sides as well as the height of the rear seats . I was so disappointed and walked away feeling like it would be a waste to buy it but cant carry regular stuff in my trunk like I've done with the older model.
Has less usable space in the rear than our current 2021 Highlander which isn’t a huge space for it’s class. Was looking forward to the Sequoia but not seeing the point now.
What a great review. You nailed this one. All other reviewers have been focused on all of the upgrades which are pretty standard for vehicles now, and you nailed it with main issues here. This vehicle missed the mark on cargo and 3rd row design. The purpose of a vehicle like this is to have that option of 3rd row seating or massive cargo space, what a disappointment from Toyota. I want to love this new sequoia, I was really close to getting a last generation TRD Pro but the age of the design and lack of techology was too hard to accept. This vehicle improved on all the issues with the old one, but now missed the mark which for me are deal breakers, which is the space, the lack of auto 4x4, and some wonky trim level options (slightly less annoying). Long story short thanks for a great review, very unbiased and thorough. Appreciated.
Yes, since last January I thought I’d be trying to get one of these. But the more I saw and thought about the third row and storage area, the more I realized it’d be a nagging issue that would not resolve itself. I’ve been swayed back towards the Tahoe route primarily because of their rear independent suspension and flat loading floor. Bummer, because that power train on the Sequoia is so sweet.
@@daneswanson7031 same. I had been patiently waiting for this new generation of Sequoia the last few years to be our family hauler/road trip vehicle since we use my pro tundra for that now and was hoping for a 20+mpg highway SUV with decent storage. The word disappointed doesn't come close to how I feel about the new tundra and Sequoia. They had so long to make them great in their segments and failed miserably.
@@urs6onfuturas975 I agree fully. Toyota could’ve stolen so many customers away from the American brands. Also, I know that there’s lots of standard equipment on the Sequoia which is great if you get an SR5. But having to spend over $70k just to get second row bucket seats is also frustrating. I would imagine there’s a lot of other families out there who are easy to get their post-COVID-road-trippin on. Hope you find something great for you and your family.
@@daneswanson7031 the second row captains chairs are one reason why we didn't go with a Highlander. I couldn't justify a $50k+ Highlander just to get them over a more capable full size. Thank you though, we actually just tacked another 2,700 miles give or take on the tundra just last week visiting my wife's family. I bought it with 1 mile on the odometer and have every intention to keep it until the earth takes it back.
Yeah, hybrid but no noticeable improvement of gas mileage. Good ground clearance except the weird super low-hanging trim or whatever under the grill. Huge vehicle but unworkable space. Giant price tag.... Pass. 🫤 Guess we'll stick to Ford with the external keypad ❤️❤️❤️
Yeah the rear cargo is the worst part about it, easily... That shelf actually makes it a bit better but I wonder how much weight it can hold before it bends and breaks... Also, just making the rear 1" longer would literally solve all of it lol.
Im not even going to go look at one. I was really hyped on getting a Sequoia hybrid, but as everyone else is saying, the lack if storage and sleeping space ruins it for me. I cant even remove the third row!!!
Woohoo! Made my Friday night! Glad you’re back to review the sequoia and congrats again on the engagement! Only bummer is that rear cargo space may just get a highlander or tundra at that point
Standard hybrid is great. If your shopping for a new SUZ there basically 60+. The cargo space and configuration is a major problem the seats in my Tahoe fold down flat and there is a ton of cargo capacity. I love ever thing about the 2023 sequoia but the cargo space is a deal braker.
Good overall review. Since this vehicle is replacing the Land Cruiser in the US it makes sense to have the solid rear axle and locking rear diff. Some will argue auto 4 is more desirable and that makes sense in rainy/snowy areas but from a true off road perspective a live axle with locker would be preferred. For myself who lives in the south of the US I would not want a full time 4WD vehicle. Conversely that live axle plus the battery pack does eat into the cargo space which is a negative for many as well. I think this is a good effort overall but as the reviewer stated perhaps a non hybrid version or extended wheelbase version would be welcome additions in the future.
@@Toyota4Life what does it have going for it other than “it’s a Toyota”? Poor interior space Atrocious cargo space No independent rear suspension Overpriced Mpg is barely better than the v8 yet it still falls behind the Diesel engines Worst ride quality in the class while others ride significantly better The capstone interior still falls behind the wagoneer or grand Cherokee summit or Yukon Denali ultimate Try to counter these statements and you’ll quickly be seen right through
@@naveenthemachine Best looking in its class Class leading mpg Class leading Power Best power train combination Class leading interior Toyota resale and build quality TRD pro model is incredible I can go on and on. Love the TRD pro model sold on its looks alone
@@Toyota4Life the interior is not class leading 😂 The wagoneer interior is way nicer Build quality isn’t as good as it’s rivals. Lower end models feel very cheap inside Mpg isn’t class leading compared to the GM Diesel engines If you’re gonna say how Toyotas class leading at least get your facts straight 😂 Do a side by side comparison of all those attributes and with real facts and numbers tell me who wins
Thanks for the "issue with the 3rd row interior." I have thought that since the 1st time I saw it. I really wanted one, but not any more, Need a flat rear. Great video as usual!
Toyota really phoned in the Sequoia after redesigning the Tundra and simply put a third row and a fully enclosed cab on the Tundra. GM, Ford and FCA all learned that SUV buyers demand more than that. This new Sequoia lacks a unique interior, automatic AWD, independent rear suspension and the compromised third row and cargo compartment is very poor. The powertrain is very good though. Overall 7/10.
I’d give it a solid F 5/10 Because they completely screwed up EVERYTHING Time for me to rub it in your face about how wrong you were when I said before the sequoia is DOA
Really nice vehicle, but like most new SUV’s of similar type are just so expensive, the upper trims get close to that six figure sum, I couldn’t imagine spending that much money on a vehicle. People be taking 8-10 year loans on these types of vehicles just to be able to get one. I’d rather just wait couple years an get a decent priced used one
Agree. I have a Gen1 first off the line in Sept 2000. Both AC units are untouched in 22 years. 310K miles. Never left me stuck on the side of road. Will drive this thing into the ground. The rear seats are heavy AF but really comportable. The main improvement of the 2023 is the rear lift up window. The slide in rear window has been the the biggest PITA on the car and have replaced the rear latch 4+ times.
I really like the exterior styling of this rig. Nice upgrade. Where they lost it is the interior layout and the cargo configuration. What in the world were they thinking? That layout almost makes it seem like they don't want to really compete in that segment. Unbelievable misstep by Toyota.
I am very pleased that you now include a complete review and demonstration of seats before you get into the driver seat. Fantastic addition. Seats are the most important consideration for a new car. 👏👏👏👏
The grand highlander is looking like a better option for me. The cargo area in the grand is enormous. And its a hybrid. The Toyota hybrid tech is the pinnacle. And the safety sense tech is great too. In a nutshell, ill keep my gen1 for a little while longer
So disappointing. It’s looks like a mid-size SUV inside now. Wife had the Atlas and Grand Cherokee L and the space looks the same. Toyota really messed up on this. Will be sticking with my 2018 Sequoia for many years now.
Great review! I have the same feelings. That back cargo area if a deal breaker for me. I’ve loved the past Sequioa’s due to the space and the seats laying flat + the roll down window. For folks who carry a bunch of gear and have pets this change is going to be a no go for a lot buyers. Bummed for sure as I like a lot of the styling for this upgrade and the hybrid version.
just the most goofy concept for the cargo area....what were they thinking? engineers should be fired for this design...When Dodge can get the seats to fold away to level out status I would think that Toyota can come up with something better than this....a complete debacle of design
Why is everyone switching to smaller engines with Turbo??? I want v8 normal aspiration where I can expect 500k miles. Throw turbo in there youll get oil leaks at 70k
Im pretty sure toyota realizes if you want to haul additional people the third row gives the capabilty. But in most cases family sizes are less than 6, and folding the third row for more storage allows you to load more in the back anyway so they didnt feel like it needed to be bigger. Plus that hybrid battery needs space too.
Thank you for showing us CarPlay, some reviewers completely ignore it. I love that it uses the ENTIRE SCREEN!! How is the resolution on the screen though? Toyotas are known for super low res displays like in the Toyota Venza. This seems a step up from the usual but can you confirm?
Looks pretty nice but the rear seat packaging is really lame, same with the nickle battery. If they used lithium-ion I bet they would be able to fit the seats in the floor since lithium ion can store more capacity with less space than nickle.
How are you going to engineer a full sized SUV with such a mediocre cargo room? And then replace the suspension in favor of a worse one. Toyota is making so many questionable decisions these days.
@@user-tb7rn1il3q in Los Angeles, where I live, diesel is cheaper than regular unleaded in a couple of places, but cheaper than premium unleaded(what the gas escalade requires) in most places.
Toyota saw how GM knocked it out of the park with the new Tahoe/Yukon but still came out with this as their best offering? It would’ve been plenty competitive with the last gen competitors, but this is already behind the new offerings in the segment.
I wanted to love this Sequoia but the lack of cargo space is a dealbreaker. They need to add a third-row delete option or at least the ability to easily take the third row seats out without fear of compromising the battery.
Less cargo room, less ground clearance, no full time 4Hi option, no roll down rear window. All features the previous 2nd gen dinosaur had. Whyyyyy, Toyota?!
I know. Because they want to eventually kill themselves because they now accept that other brands are more competitive and their reliability is much better than before not as less reliable as a Toyota
I was surprised to see Toyota go back to the old drivetrain on the rear axle. I always thought of Toyota being the company that looks ahead and not back. Another thing I don’t like is the loss of the V-8 engine. I know everybody’s concerned about mpg but I’m “old school” and a V-8 was the choice in large vehicles like the SUV category. I do love the new styling, they did a great job on that but as you mentioned if you’re taking 6 or 7 people on a trip and their luggage you don’t want this vehicle. I’d prefer the Expedition but I’m an old ford guy anyway. Great review, you do the best job in giving us relative information.
As always, another great review. So glad you pointed out the cargo area. It is really hard to believe that Toyota royally messed this up. Makes you wonder what the designers were thinking? I was sold until you showed that. Deal breaker for sure.
@@carlodelafuente8807 The Pilot is a medium-sized suv that is smaller than the Sequoia. I own the current generation of it and I am happy with the size - it's large enough to carry big items if needed yet is not humongous so it's fairly practical as a daily driver. Would be interested to see what the new Pilot looks like but I will likely be keeping the previous one for a long time.
It’s perfect I like it and Don’t need cargo space i just need a roof rack or hitch cargo carrier, when you go on a family trip for more than a week I always need more space.
Everybody saying the same thing in every comment y'all know why they switch to the hybrid setup it was for torque and emissions it was never for fuel economy
@@FermentedFish7 better MPG than what it was getting before that damn 5.7 was barely getting 18 on the highway and why the fuck would you buy a full size truck the complain about the fuel economy I don't get people these days ... You can't have a full size truck and good gas that shit don't go together hybrid or no hybrid
@@FermentedFish7 LOL it always was ... The damn thing is built like a lunch box why do you care about fuel economy how good mileage you think you going to get in a damn box 😅
@@jermainec2462 right some people's logic when you buy a truck or want one that bad that means gas savings is out of the window. Be smart when making decisions and ask yourself if you can actually afford it or keep moving. It's the same concept when people buy the corolla sedan, they expect zoom zoom speed when many don't realise that it's the gas savings that you are buying for. The more gas per gallon saved, the quick acceleration is compromised. So my 2020 Corolla the highway mileage is 38mpg but that also means it's not going to be quick 0-60. Speed and gas savings don't mix, choose one or the other.
Thanks for the thorough review. One UA-camr mentioned hesitation or chatter “Chadder” when the car switched from electric motor to gasoline engine? What are your thoughts? Was that hybrid to gasoline transition felt when you drove it or was it smooth?
What take is there? 😂 it’s a complete disaster. Shrunken interior poor cargo space no independent rear suspension meaning poor ride quality, disappointing mpg and it gets very expensive
@@Erin-Thor I agree reliability matters… If it’s the best selling in its Class. Vehicles like the rav4 Camry corolla are huge for Toyota because it’s affordable unlike this, and when you see more of it on the road you can see reliability matters in the mainstream
You nailed the issues with the third row and cargo area. This specific class is one where both of those are critically important. Toyota completely messed up here.
Meanwhile, all major companies have several EVs yet they still have no real EVs available despite them leading the hybrid market for years. Toyota's insane slowness will be their downfall. Anyways, Hyundai and Kia is killing it with EVs and ICE cars.
I think eventually Toyota could be put out of business with putting out mediocre products that get spanked by the Koreans The Koreans are the new Toyota and lexus
If it wasn't for the 7 seater, and compromised space this would be such a nice vehicle that I'd be itching for. To me though I'd prefer the competition.
Thank you for your review. I really appreciate you taking the time and reviewing the interior of the vehicle. Most people focus on the powertrain, and gloss over the interior. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a powertrain guy, but I like to know what the interior is like. I have ordered the TRD Pro. Hope it works out. Cheers
You could buy this huge thing and use it to drive 4 people and some luggage. Not a fan of the huge blinding screen. The mpg at 21 is not good either given all the hybrid hype and concessions. However, at 75K I will never get to experience the shortfalls of it.
Hybrid for big truck is never for gas saving... Same thing with a sports car, those hybrid only for instant torque and lower emission so it wont get fined by enviromentalist
I'm amazed at how absurd is the cargo area / 3rd row design. Have they forgotten about the batteries? This whole shelf with flaps idea is making it even more bizarre.
This makes me so angry that a smart company like Toyota could completely miss the mark on this one. Dumping the V8 for a V6, while not ideal, is not a deal breaker for most people. But to have that amateur trunk space design is a deal breaker for me (and judging by the comments below a deal breaker for most people). The trunk space design looks so cobbled together as if it was done by the same designers of Ikea furniture.
Excellent, all encompassing review. Regarding the car, great design, beautiful interior and very impressive performance. However, two major drawback is the unpractical cargo area. This car is a giant so one would expect ample (and usable) room.
Missing a non hybrid version, especially since Toyota is supposed to be using the electric motors for performance and not for increasing mpg. Even more with the tight space in the 3rd row. I do not care much about the flat cargo, but not veing ablento fit an adult in the back is a big loss compared to some of the american offerings. Plus, if there is one thing domestic companies do well is big suvs, hard market to offer a product that it is missing in these departments.
Twin turbo and a hybrid ?! There goes the reliability. As a mechanic most turbos go bad around 60kmiles all the way right after warranty. I've seen Hybrids batteries go bad at all miles. People don't see the cost future cost of maintenance with these new vehicles.
I have a Toyota Prius from 2009. Hybrid battery is solid in prius at least. Gen 2 are generally known as rocks. If this is like my prius, then the battery will be fine.
@@mattmekhaeil it seems true for the old model not sure about the new model. V6 turbo hybrid what can go wrong. I guess the tundra already have waste gate issues.
Fail...DOA. most buyers for large SUVs are moms that can fold the 2 row seat with the base of the car seat still attached and also a bench seat. Chevy Tahoe will still outsell this model. 3rd row space and cargo space is also a fail.
I was so hyped for this. Love the exterior of it, the dash and infotainment is awesome looking. But having a family, this cargo area being so messed up really pushed me to go to a different brand. I really wanted this. But the hybrid only was a huge mistake
Hybrid-only was an OK choice. Going backwards with a rear suspension requiring more room that impacted cargo/passenger practicality is where a focus group should have slapped some sense into them!
Are the captain's chairs center console with the cup holders removable to create a true pass through? I would like that option so my larger dog can stand/sit between them.
With the decrease in cargo room, Toyota definitely should’ve at least considered adding a long version to the Sequoia lineup this year to compete with the Suburban, Expedition Max, etc. That way you could have plenty of comfortable 3rd row room since it is moveable and enough cargo space.
The fuel tank is a little on the small side at 24 gallons, plus this was barely broken in and the most we got was around 380 miles on a full tank. Suspect it’ll go up as the truck breaks in more though.
My 2015 4Runner Limited has a 3rd row that looks like it's about the same size. As my family is getting bigger, I was really counting on a Sequoia to be the next family vehicle for us. However it seems like the Expedition is now at the top of the list. 🤦
the third row is such a huge disappointment. In today's market, why not have the third row fold flat? You might as well not have it fold down at all. Pretty much useless. I think I'll keep my current gen Sequoia. It may be dated but at least I can fold the third row flat. What Toyota could do is give us a non-hybrid version with a 'actual' fold flat third row seat. As of right now with its current configuration, it is a deal breaker!
This truck needed a different placement for its batteries, the 3rd row and cargo are way too compromised for a full size. They should have made it larger to compensate like wagoneer sized
It is astounding the (detrimental) choices made here that they know how to do on other models. The Sienna is NOT a small vehicle; its 1.9 kwH battery exists under the front seats!
I was taking a shot every time he said "kind of" and now I'm dead. Seriously though, looking forward to buying one. Had an '08 for about 8 years and it was great but definitely aged and pretty bad gas mileage. BTW, it would've made more sense to have it beside the actual last generation, not the first generation. Overall though, nice thorough review!
Technical masterpeace from the Toyota. I have only one question is it so reliable as all Toyota products? I like the exterior more than in Lexus and it is brilliant! As for the interior it is not so good as I wanted. Big, powerfull, stylish and expensive dinosaur. What else one need from the modern Japan SUV? I only add it badly needs more luxury: masage and ventilated seats in dark brown colour and of couse a fragrance like in Mercedes S class. The best SUV from Toyota right now. I totally understand people who invest in "bank of Toyota" products - they already tested american quality and made their choice.
I don’t think we have to really question reliability so much when it comes to Toyota. It would hard to believe they wouldn’t make this vehicle reliable and just purposely damage their image. Too early to know if it’s a 500k+ mileage vehicle but a safe 250k I think so.
The Tundra which has the same powertrain as the Sequoia already having issues with the turbos. I highly doubt these engines will be as reliable as the old V8. You should get 200k miles but the old V8 was famous for going up to a million miles so I doubt these new Sequoias/Tundras will hold their values as well as the old ones.
A deal breaker for me cuz of the 3rd row seat. I am deciding between a tundra and the “Grand Highlander” that rumors to be released next year. Still wouldn’t go with Chevys or Ford cuz of the potential reliabilities issues.
Older Toyota ? Yes reliable. But for newer cars I don’t really care for it. I moved on from life long Toyota fanboysim. Deal breaker was how uncomfortable seats are. I am going ford and not looking back
Wow just wow...a huge truck with a completely compromised cargo space. I would like to look into the eyes of the designer who thought that was a good idea and then look into the eyes of the person that approved it...it's just unbelievable
Love your honest non biased reviews sounds like toyota made alot of compromises just to give us the hybrid. Im very upset that they only offer the hybrid power train as only choice i agree with you they should have given us just the turbo 6 as an option i definitely like the sequoia but wouldn't buy 1 because of hybrid only power train and im in the market for a big suv also thanks for the heads up on cargo space keep up good work
You are so right that is exactly what they should’ve Toyota should’ve did either you can option the ttv6 non hybrid engine or the ttv6 hybrid but if the customer does hybrid model you lose on the 3rd row capabilities and if you stick with the non hybrid model you gain the extra space in the 3rd row that would’ve been smart decision come on Toyota engineering 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️😂😂
The Armada is probably the only Japanese built in the segment and the 5.6 is a proven motor. I'm on the fence between the sequoia, expedition, and armada. Will be purchasing a new family bus once this market cools down. The expedition is what I'm gravitating to. I need something with a trunk for long trips. Not digging the solid axel. It may feel unsettled over bumps at higher speeds. I do like the looks of the sequoia a lot.
@@Erin-Thor probably nothing at all. In typical Toyota fashion they manage to _just_ be better than the doggiest of brands but that is absolutely it. . . No pushing the envelope. No innovation worthy of a highlight.
Happy Friday guys! Sorry for the late post, we are in Nashville right now and spent the day driving the new CR-V! Excited to share our thoughts on redesigned Sequoia, they should be going into production next month and in dealer lots shortly after that. We love how Toyota made it a hybrid, but do you think they should consider making a non-hybrid and a longer version?
Thanks for y’all’s hard work! Please tell me you aren’t staying at red roof or motel six. 🤣
edit. Did you look underneath at the exhaust? I’m wondering if they actually used a dual exhaust as most times one is cosmetic.
Yesterday i share video in arabic about CRv Honda
Hi Sofyan, when can we expect your CRV driving impressions/full review video?
@@ttcman-nocommentarygaming5349 Embargo ends on 8/30 at 9am EST. It’ll be a few weeks still but it’ll be worth the wait!
Yes
Before the debut, I was almost certain I was going to purchase a year 3 version of the new Sequoia.
However, they compromised the cargo so badly that it's a deal breaker for me.
And Massa Biden DESTROYED our economy too.
Honestly this truck is almost perfect such a shame the third row doesn't fold down all the way
@@Lazylion572 The price you pay for fuel economy. I have a feeling this is the way going forward since something has to be sacrificed to make space for the batteries. I rather they did this than to make cheap thinner seats that allow you to fold flat and have miserable passengers on long road trips. Still pass for me, rather own a Sienna. Off-roading is the only plus on this.
@@PWCDN They had to do something. My '17 4Runner is at 16mpg highway. It's baaaaad, the Sequoia was worse. The Landcruiser priced itself out of the US market and this one is, too. $80K?????
Same here, I’m kinda mad now because the rest of the vehicle is almost perfect
The cargo space is a joke the old one had 120 cubic ft they should keep the hybrid optional and put am independent rear suspension
Toyota screwed the Tundra up too and you won't get the stated mpg's there always lower.
Yeah might as well remove the third row.
@@melvin5818
3rd row removal means u need to wait for new 4 runner
That and the second row that doesn’t slide was the deal breaker for me
@@TobyCostaRica not sure what the hell toyota was thinking. Second row is stationary but third row can slide back and forth. The second row will be used more than the third row. The option to adjust your seat is more crucial for the second row. This was a dumb decision.
GREATEST REVIEW so far! I went to see one today and I somewhat loved it. It stands bigger than it looks on the computer with a lot more tech than my older model. The deal breaker for me was the ridiculously smaller trunk space. The trunk is a lot narrower than the older model both vertically and horizontally due to the slightly oval shape of the upper entry part of the trunk sides as well as the height of the rear seats . I was so disappointed and walked away feeling like it would be a waste to buy it but cant carry regular stuff in my trunk like I've done with the older model.
Has less usable space in the rear than our current 2021 Highlander which isn’t a huge space for it’s class. Was looking forward to the Sequoia but not seeing the point now.
This is my favorite car reviews channel. Always so detailed ... right down to 'does the horn sound appropriate ' 😄
He’s anal.
What a great review. You nailed this one. All other reviewers have been focused on all of the upgrades which are pretty standard for vehicles now, and you nailed it with main issues here. This vehicle missed the mark on cargo and 3rd row design. The purpose of a vehicle like this is to have that option of 3rd row seating or massive cargo space, what a disappointment from Toyota. I want to love this new sequoia, I was really close to getting a last generation TRD Pro but the age of the design and lack of techology was too hard to accept. This vehicle improved on all the issues with the old one, but now missed the mark which for me are deal breakers, which is the space, the lack of auto 4x4, and some wonky trim level options (slightly less annoying).
Long story short thanks for a great review, very unbiased and thorough. Appreciated.
Yes, since last January I thought I’d be trying to get one of these. But the more I saw and thought about the third row and storage area, the more I realized it’d be a nagging issue that would not resolve itself. I’ve been swayed back towards the Tahoe route primarily because of their rear independent suspension and flat loading floor. Bummer, because that power train on the Sequoia is so sweet.
@@daneswanson7031 same. I had been patiently waiting for this new generation of Sequoia the last few years to be our family hauler/road trip vehicle since we use my pro tundra for that now and was hoping for a 20+mpg highway SUV with decent storage. The word disappointed doesn't come close to how I feel about the new tundra and Sequoia. They had so long to make them great in their segments and failed miserably.
@@urs6onfuturas975 I agree fully. Toyota could’ve stolen so many customers away from the American brands. Also, I know that there’s lots of standard equipment on the Sequoia which is great if you get an SR5. But having to spend over $70k just to get second row bucket seats is also frustrating.
I would imagine there’s a lot of other families out there who are easy to get their post-COVID-road-trippin on. Hope you find something great for you and your family.
@@daneswanson7031 the second row captains chairs are one reason why we didn't go with a Highlander. I couldn't justify a $50k+ Highlander just to get them over a more capable full size.
Thank you though, we actually just tacked another 2,700 miles give or take on the tundra just last week visiting my wife's family. I bought it with 1 mile on the odometer and have every intention to keep it until the earth takes it back.
Yeah, hybrid but no noticeable improvement of gas mileage. Good ground clearance except the weird super low-hanging trim or whatever under the grill. Huge vehicle but unworkable space. Giant price tag.... Pass. 🫤 Guess we'll stick to Ford with the external keypad ❤️❤️❤️
Another solid review brotha man! In fact, thanks for not selling out.
Love the new Sequoia just wish it had more cargo space behind the 3rd row
I just wish 3rd row delete was an option on a lot of SUV'S.
always something isn't it
Yeah the rear cargo is the worst part about it, easily... That shelf actually makes it a bit better but I wonder how much weight it can hold before it bends and breaks...
Also, just making the rear 1" longer would literally solve all of it lol.
Saves few bucks for Toyota 😉
Go buy your extra space SUV and enjoy the constant repair bills
Im not even going to go look at one.
I was really hyped on getting a Sequoia hybrid, but as everyone else is saying, the lack if storage and sleeping space ruins it for me.
I cant even remove the third row!!!
Woohoo! Made my Friday night! Glad you’re back to review the sequoia and congrats again on the engagement!
Only bummer is that rear cargo space may just get a highlander or tundra at that point
Standard hybrid is great. If your shopping for a new SUZ there basically 60+. The cargo space and configuration is a major problem the seats in my Tahoe fold down flat and there is a ton of cargo capacity. I love ever thing about the 2023 sequoia but the cargo space is a deal braker.
Sequoia > Tahoe anyday brother...... keep your junk
Good overall review. Since this vehicle is replacing the Land Cruiser in the US it makes sense to have the solid rear axle and locking rear diff. Some will argue auto 4 is more desirable and that makes sense in rainy/snowy areas but from a true off road perspective a live axle with locker would be preferred. For myself who lives in the south of the US I would not want a full time 4WD vehicle. Conversely that live axle plus the battery pack does eat into the cargo space which is a negative for many as well. I think this is a good effort overall but as the reviewer stated perhaps a non hybrid version or extended wheelbase version would be welcome additions in the future.
once enough suburbanites break the 4wd they'll have to add the torsen back
"Since this vehicle is replacing the Land Cruiser in the US....." This comment didn't age well.
Toyota nailed the design 👌🏻. This machine is beautiful 😍.
Toyota lineup is looking incredible.
I never doubted Toyota. Fun fact this is the most Powerful Japanese SUV ever.
But the sequoia is a massive screwup
Only you would say it’s the best in class when everyone else including myself would laugh at you for saying it
@@naveenthemachine nah. It has tons of stuff going for it. It will sell on its looks and impressive engine alone
@@Toyota4Life what does it have going for it other than “it’s a Toyota”?
Poor interior space
Atrocious cargo space
No independent rear suspension
Overpriced
Mpg is barely better than the v8 yet it still falls behind the Diesel engines
Worst ride quality in the class while others ride significantly better
The capstone interior still falls behind the wagoneer or grand Cherokee summit or Yukon Denali ultimate
Try to counter these statements and you’ll quickly be seen right through
@@naveenthemachine
Best looking in its class
Class leading mpg
Class leading Power
Best power train combination
Class leading interior
Toyota resale and build quality
TRD pro model is incredible
I can go on and on. Love the TRD pro model sold on its looks alone
@@Toyota4Life the interior is not class leading 😂
The wagoneer interior is way nicer
Build quality isn’t as good as it’s rivals. Lower end models feel very cheap inside
Mpg isn’t class leading compared to the GM Diesel engines
If you’re gonna say how Toyotas class leading at least get your facts straight 😂
Do a side by side comparison of all those attributes and with real facts and numbers tell me who wins
Brothers that 0-60 is impressive imho. I know other SUVS are faster but Toyota is usually fairly conservative
It’s pretty impressive considering the size and weight of this thing lol
0-60 LITERALLY doesn't matter. This is a giant family suv
@@RayanMADAO who knows they might want drive like crazy I drive my moms Toyota Sienna like hellcat
@@RayanMADAO it matters when your trying to get out a bad situation with your family
The powertrain in this vehicles extremely impressive in FACT it’s the most powerful Japanese SUV to ever be on sale
Thanks for the "issue with the 3rd row interior." I have thought that since the 1st time I saw it. I really wanted one, but not any more, Need a flat rear. Great video as usual!
Some of your peers are full of praise so I quit listening to them you have balance, positives and negatives. Very constructive and honest.
Toyota really phoned in the Sequoia after redesigning the Tundra and simply put a third row and a fully enclosed cab on the Tundra. GM, Ford and FCA all learned that SUV buyers demand more than that. This new Sequoia lacks a unique interior, automatic AWD, independent rear suspension and the compromised third row and cargo compartment is very poor. The powertrain is very good though. Overall 7/10.
I’d give it a solid F 5/10
Because they completely screwed up EVERYTHING
Time for me to rub it in your face about how wrong you were when I said before the sequoia is DOA
In the 1990s, I used to watch TV at home on a 14" monitor.
Really nice vehicle, but like most new SUV’s of similar type are just so expensive, the upper trims get close to that six figure sum, I couldn’t imagine spending that much money on a vehicle. People be taking 8-10 year loans on these types of vehicles just to be able to get one. I’d rather just wait couple years an get a decent priced used one
that cargo space is brutal, makes my gen 1 sequoia look real good. This one doesn't seem to be a utility vehicle really at all.
Agree. I have a Gen1 first off the line in Sept 2000. Both AC units are untouched in 22 years. 310K miles. Never left me stuck on the side of road. Will drive this thing into the ground. The rear seats are heavy AF but really comportable. The main improvement of the 2023 is the rear lift up window. The slide in rear window has been the the biggest PITA on the car and have replaced the rear latch 4+ times.
Wow! I'm shocked that the lack of cohesive design in the interior.
I think it was intentional.
I really like the exterior styling of this rig. Nice upgrade. Where they lost it is the interior layout and the cargo configuration. What in the world were they thinking? That layout almost makes it seem like they don't want to really compete in that segment. Unbelievable misstep by Toyota.
Personally think the exterior styling is a gm lookalike, only worse.
@@WineHouse33 pls don’t say that
The cargo configuration makes no sense.. usually people buy these large suv for the large cargo space… Ill pass.. oh Toyota toyota
Nice vehicle, but that load floor is a deal breaker for me. Large flat load floor is high on my list.
Not a gun owner, eh?
@@bb5242 what you mean
I am very pleased that you now include a complete review and demonstration of seats before you get into the driver seat. Fantastic addition. Seats are the most important consideration for a new car. 👏👏👏👏
The grand highlander is looking like a better option for me. The cargo area in the grand is enormous. And its a hybrid. The Toyota hybrid tech is the pinnacle. And the safety sense tech is great too. In a nutshell, ill keep my gen1 for a little while longer
So disappointing. It’s looks like a mid-size SUV inside now. Wife had the Atlas and Grand Cherokee L and the space looks the same. Toyota really messed up on this. Will be sticking with my 2018 Sequoia for many years now.
Great review! I have the same feelings. That back cargo area if a deal breaker for me. I’ve loved the past Sequioa’s due to the space and the seats laying flat + the roll down window. For folks who carry a bunch of gear and have pets this change is going to be a no go for a lot buyers. Bummed for sure as I like a lot of the styling for this upgrade and the hybrid version.
Yeah honestly thinking of going the route of the Tundra because of the lack of space
just the most goofy concept for the cargo area....what were they thinking? engineers should be fired for this design...When Dodge can get the seats to fold away to level out status I would think that Toyota can come up with something better than this....a complete debacle of design
Why is everyone switching to smaller engines with Turbo??? I want v8 normal aspiration where I can expect 500k miles. Throw turbo in there youll get oil leaks at 70k
With that third row what are you putting in the cargo area??
Im pretty sure toyota realizes if you want to haul additional people the third row gives the capabilty. But in most cases family sizes are less than 6, and folding the third row for more storage allows you to load more in the back anyway so they didnt feel like it needed to be bigger. Plus that hybrid battery needs space too.
Been waiting for Redline review of this truck
This All-new Toyota Sequoia looks amazing.
Nice job with your content as always Sofyan.
Thank you for showing us CarPlay, some reviewers completely ignore it. I love that it uses the ENTIRE SCREEN!! How is the resolution on the screen though? Toyotas are known for super low res displays like in the Toyota Venza. This seems a step up from the usual but can you confirm?
Looks pretty nice but the rear seat packaging is really lame, same with the nickle battery. If they used lithium-ion I bet they would be able to fit the seats in the floor since lithium ion can store more capacity with less space than nickle.
I love that you have a huge smile on your face as you rip those rear tires down the road! 🔥👍😊
How are you going to engineer a full sized SUV with such a mediocre cargo room? And then replace the suspension in favor of a worse one.
Toyota is making so many questionable decisions these days.
You’ve gotten so good at this that I don’t even watch anyone else’s videos bro! 🤩
I agree
My diesel 4x4 escalade esv gets 26-28mpg on the highway.
Yes but diesel is $6 a gallon vice $4 a gallon for gas.
@@user-tb7rn1il3q in Los Angeles, where I live, diesel is cheaper than regular unleaded in a couple of places, but cheaper than premium unleaded(what the gas escalade requires) in most places.
NW diesel is a dollar more than premium
This is going to be my next truck, I actually like the cargo area how it's raised then you have some space underneath.
Toyota saw how GM knocked it out of the park with the new Tahoe/Yukon but still came out with this as their best offering? It would’ve been plenty competitive with the last gen competitors, but this is already behind the new offerings in the segment.
You literally just helped my original comment
those calves 😩 sofyan is 🔥
I wanted to love this Sequoia but the lack of cargo space is a dealbreaker. They need to add a third-row delete option or at least the ability to easily take the third row seats out without fear of compromising the battery.
Less cargo room, less ground clearance, no full time 4Hi option, no roll down rear window. All features the previous 2nd gen dinosaur had. Whyyyyy, Toyota?!
I know. Because they want to eventually kill themselves because they now accept that other brands are more competitive and their reliability is much better than before not as less reliable as a Toyota
I was surprised to see Toyota go back to the old drivetrain on the rear axle. I always thought of Toyota being the company that looks ahead and not back. Another thing I don’t like is the loss of the V-8 engine. I know everybody’s concerned about mpg but I’m “old school” and a V-8 was the choice in large vehicles like the SUV category. I do love the new styling, they did a great job on that but as you mentioned if you’re taking 6 or 7 people on a trip and their luggage you don’t want this vehicle. I’d prefer the Expedition but I’m an old ford guy anyway. Great review, you do the best job in giving us relative information.
They did it to save costs
Old school thinking is killing our planet. Get over it
Toyota missed it on interior design. Better off with a Highlander unless you need to do some heavy towing.
As always, another great review. So glad you pointed out the cargo area. It is really hard to believe that Toyota royally messed this up. Makes you wonder what the designers were thinking? I was sold until you showed that. Deal breaker for sure.
Deal breaker for sure. Sorry Toyota, might have to wait for the new Honda Pilot as I dont want to go bigger than this just for cargo room.
I'm so disappointed in Toyota. They wacked the Tundra out of the park in 2007. Toyota Bunted or walked for 2022. I'm looking elsewhere now.
@@carlodelafuente8807 The Pilot is a medium-sized suv that is smaller than the Sequoia. I own the current generation of it and I am happy with the size - it's large enough to carry big items if needed yet is not humongous so it's fairly practical as a daily driver. Would be interested to see what the new Pilot looks like but I will likely be keeping the previous one for a long time.
It’s perfect I like it and Don’t need cargo space i just need a roof rack or hitch cargo carrier, when you go on a family trip for more than a week I always need more space.
Even with the hybrid, there is no significant fuel advantage over all gas engine.
Everybody saying the same thing in every comment y'all know why they switch to the hybrid setup it was for torque and emissions it was never for fuel economy
@@jermainec2462 at those fuel ratings, it’s a gas guzzler.
@@FermentedFish7 better MPG than what it was getting before that damn 5.7 was barely getting 18 on the highway and why the fuck would you buy a full size truck the complain about the fuel economy I don't get people these days ... You can't have a full size truck and good gas that shit don't go together hybrid or no hybrid
@@FermentedFish7 LOL it always was ... The damn thing is built like a lunch box why do you care about fuel economy how good mileage you think you going to get in a damn box 😅
@@jermainec2462 right some people's logic when you buy a truck or want one that bad that means gas savings is out of the window. Be smart when making decisions and ask yourself if you can actually afford it or keep moving. It's the same concept when people buy the corolla sedan, they expect zoom zoom speed when many don't realise that it's the gas savings that you are buying for. The more gas per gallon saved, the quick acceleration is compromised. So my 2020 Corolla the highway mileage is 38mpg but that also means it's not going to be quick 0-60. Speed and gas savings don't mix, choose one or the other.
Thanks for the thorough review. One UA-camr mentioned hesitation or chatter “Chadder” when the car switched from electric motor to gasoline engine? What are your thoughts? Was that hybrid to gasoline transition felt when you drove it or was it smooth?
So glad they gave you early access! We desperately needed your take on this new sequoia!
What take is there? 😂 it’s a complete disaster. Shrunken interior poor cargo space no independent rear suspension meaning poor ride quality, disappointing mpg and it gets very expensive
@@naveenthemachine - Reliability matters. (Ducking) 🤣
@@Erin-Thor I agree reliability matters…
If it’s the best selling in its Class. Vehicles like the rav4 Camry corolla are huge for Toyota because it’s affordable unlike this, and when you see more of it on the road you can see reliability matters in the mainstream
I love that it has a solid rear axle. Not a regression in my eyes. Thanks for the vid and info!
You nailed the issues with the third row and cargo area. This specific class is one where both of those are critically important. Toyota completely messed up here.
Imagine you have a pet. That would be definitely a deal braker.
I tried to warn you all the negatives yet you all ignored me 😂
I really wanted this car but the sub par cargo space has ruined it for me. It’s not practical anymore.
That cargo space is a real deal breaker.
What are you going to carry in the back? a house? If you fold the third row down, it has plenty of space.
@@Soul_Flow_ 😂😂😂 Americans like more space
@@Soul_Flow_ you have no idea what Americans like 😂.
@@Soul_Flow_ if you have 3 or more kids the cargo space presents a problem since you need the 3rd row
@@naveenthemachine , I know Americans are most obese in the world, maybe that's why they need all that space
Got my fully loaded ordered! ETA late 2024. Can't wait!
Meanwhile, all major companies have several EVs yet they still have no real EVs available despite them leading the hybrid market for years. Toyota's insane slowness will be their downfall. Anyways, Hyundai and Kia is killing it with EVs and ICE cars.
I think eventually Toyota could be put out of business with putting out mediocre products that get spanked by the Koreans
The Koreans are the new Toyota and lexus
Nice review. Thanks for your time. Question, if you know it... is this engine/transmission new? IOW not a lot of heritage?
If it wasn't for the 7 seater, and compromised space this would be such a nice vehicle that I'd be itching for. To me though I'd prefer the competition.
which is bigger Expedition Max or Sequoia
There are too many compromises with this vehicle rather than the competition. The Wagoneer offers so much more + a 5.7L V8 👀
Wagoneer is also very ugly and has Jeep quality. All the materials look nice until you touch them and then they creek and rattle while you drive.
@@nothere572 Wagoneer = ugly?! Wow.
@@JokerG16 I mean it’s not an attractive looking vehicle, I wouldn’t say it’s ugly but definitely an average looking vehicle. In my opinion of course.
The 5.7 V8 is getting replaced with a Hurricane Turbo I6 soon. All V8s are on their way out.
Thank you for your review. I really appreciate you taking the time and reviewing the interior of the vehicle. Most people focus on the powertrain, and gloss over the interior. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a powertrain guy, but I like to know what the interior is like. I have ordered the TRD Pro. Hope it works out. Cheers
i dont know what reviewers youre watching but they all talk about the interior in detail, its almost the most important part of the experience.
You could buy this huge thing and use it to drive 4 people and some luggage. Not a fan of the huge blinding screen. The mpg at 21 is not good either given all the hybrid hype and concessions. However, at 75K I will never get to experience the shortfalls of it.
Not going to work for a soccer mom. 3rd row is a killer
Huge and hybrid for nothing basically.
Hybrid for big truck is never for gas saving... Same thing with a sports car, those hybrid only for instant torque and lower emission so it wont get fined by enviromentalist
This dinosaur is so useless comparing to Highlander with half of the price.
It just doesn't make any sense to buy a large suv like this and not having a cargo space in it. Weird
I'm amazed at how absurd is the cargo area / 3rd row design. Have they forgotten about the batteries? This whole shelf with flaps idea is making it even more bizarre.
Haha i just saw that part of the video! Its totally absurd what a pointless car
With that little cargo room, you might as well get a highlander for much cheaper and the same amount of seats.
The 3rd row and cargo is such a deal breaker for me. I rather get the Tahoe tbh
Where else was Toyota suppose to put the battery pack? I would take this over the Tahoe just because I don’t trust anything from GM
I love all the commercials they squeezed into this video. Probably can add a few more so every other minute could have them.
This makes me so angry that a smart company like Toyota could completely miss the mark on this one. Dumping the V8 for a V6, while not ideal, is not a deal breaker for most people. But to have that amateur trunk space design is a deal breaker for me (and judging by the comments below a deal breaker for most people). The trunk space design looks so cobbled together as if it was done by the same designers of Ikea furniture.
Thanks for the review. They almost had me until you reminded me of what the old sequoia looked like. Great review, though. 👍🏽
Excellent, all encompassing review. Regarding the car, great design, beautiful interior and very impressive performance. However, two major drawback is the unpractical cargo area. This car is a giant so one would expect ample (and usable) room.
Hi! What is more comfortable to drive in town, Capstone or TRD pro? Thanks.
Missing a non hybrid version, especially since Toyota is supposed to be using the electric motors for performance and not for increasing mpg. Even more with the tight space in the 3rd row. I do not care much about the flat cargo, but not veing ablento fit an adult in the back is a big loss compared to some of the american offerings. Plus, if there is one thing domestic companies do well is big suvs, hard market to offer a product that it is missing in these departments.
Great video! Subscribed.
Twin turbo and a hybrid ?! There goes the reliability. As a mechanic most turbos go bad around 60kmiles all the way right after warranty. I've seen Hybrids batteries go bad at all miles. People don't see the cost future cost of maintenance with these new vehicles.
I have a Toyota Prius from 2009. Hybrid battery is solid in prius at least. Gen 2 are generally known as rocks. If this is like my prius, then the battery will be fine.
@@UnseenSpirit how many miles?. Alot of seqouias owners keep it 200k+
@@tonychau1983 even if it’s high milage the cars are tanks they will last ages
@@mattmekhaeil it seems true for the old model not sure about the new model. V6 turbo hybrid what can go wrong. I guess the tundra already have waste gate issues.
Most turbos outlast the rest of the car. Hybrid battery failure is rare.
Fail...DOA. most buyers for large SUVs are moms that can fold the 2 row seat with the base of the car seat still attached and also a bench seat. Chevy Tahoe will still outsell this model. 3rd row space and cargo space is also a fail.
I was so hyped for this. Love the exterior of it, the dash and infotainment is awesome looking. But having a family, this cargo area being so messed up really pushed me to go to a different brand. I really wanted this. But the hybrid only was a huge mistake
I’m in the same boat. Kinda sucks that the only big enough cars are suburbans, Yukons etc…
Hybrid-only was an OK choice. Going backwards with a rear suspension requiring more room that impacted cargo/passenger practicality is where a focus group should have slapped some sense into them!
Are the captain's chairs center console with the cup holders removable to create a true pass through? I would like that option so my larger dog can stand/sit between them.
I wished the 3rd row folded flat that's literally the main deal breaker for me and no more reliable v8 option
5:30 gorgeous!
I can look past the cargo “issue”. This is a beautiful SUV and I really want it! 😍😍
Nice video, question: what do you use for voice audio recording?
With the decrease in cargo room, Toyota definitely should’ve at least considered adding a long version to the Sequoia lineup this year to compete with the Suburban, Expedition Max, etc. That way you could have plenty of comfortable 3rd row room since it is moveable and enough cargo space.
how many miles does it get per tank?
The fuel tank is a little on the small side at 24 gallons, plus this was barely broken in and the most we got was around 380 miles on a full tank. Suspect it’ll go up as the truck breaks in more though.
My 2015 4Runner Limited has a 3rd row that looks like it's about the same size. As my family is getting bigger, I was really counting on a Sequoia to be the next family vehicle for us. However it seems like the Expedition is now at the top of the list. 🤦
We’re on the same page here 😂😂
I finally saw this beast on the road. It looks really nice.
the third row is such a huge disappointment. In today's market, why not have the third row fold flat? You might as well not have it fold down at all. Pretty much useless. I think I'll keep my current gen Sequoia. It may be dated but at least I can fold the third row flat. What Toyota could do is give us a non-hybrid version with a 'actual' fold flat third row seat. As of right now with its current configuration, it is a deal breaker!
Maybe a slightly used Lexus LX 570 vs a fully loaded new "Capstone" version? Thanks for the great review.
This truck needed a different placement for its batteries, the 3rd row and cargo are way too compromised for a full size. They should have made it larger to compensate like wagoneer sized
It is astounding the (detrimental) choices made here that they know how to do on other models. The Sienna is NOT a small vehicle; its 1.9 kwH battery exists under the front seats!
I was taking a shot every time he said "kind of" and now I'm dead. Seriously though, looking forward to buying one. Had an '08 for about 8 years and it was great but definitely aged and pretty bad gas mileage. BTW, it would've made more sense to have it beside the actual last generation, not the first generation. Overall though, nice thorough review!
Technical masterpeace from the Toyota. I have only one question is it so reliable as all Toyota products? I like the exterior more than in Lexus and it is brilliant! As for the interior it is not so good as I wanted. Big, powerfull, stylish and expensive dinosaur. What else one need from the modern Japan SUV? I only add it badly needs more luxury: masage and ventilated seats in dark brown colour and of couse a fragrance like in Mercedes S class. The best SUV from Toyota right now. I totally understand people who invest in "bank of Toyota" products - they already tested american quality and made their choice.
I don’t think we have to really question reliability so much when it comes to Toyota. It would hard to believe they wouldn’t make this vehicle reliable and just purposely damage their image. Too early to know if it’s a 500k+ mileage vehicle but a safe 250k I think so.
The Tundra which has the same powertrain as the Sequoia already having issues with the turbos. I highly doubt these engines will be as reliable as the old V8. You should get 200k miles but the old V8 was famous for going up to a million miles so I doubt these new Sequoias/Tundras will hold their values as well as the old ones.
this car is has a wait time To buy of 2 years for the capstone trim. Better look for other options
A deal breaker for me cuz of the 3rd row seat. I am deciding between a tundra and the “Grand Highlander” that rumors to be released next year. Still wouldn’t go with Chevys or Ford cuz of the potential reliabilities issues.
Older Toyota ? Yes reliable. But for newer cars I don’t really care for it. I moved on from life long Toyota fanboysim. Deal breaker was how uncomfortable seats are. I am going ford and not looking back
Wow just wow...a huge truck with a completely compromised cargo space. I would like to look into the eyes of the designer who thought that was a good idea and then look into the eyes of the person that approved it...it's just unbelievable
Love your honest non biased reviews sounds like toyota made alot of compromises just to give us the hybrid. Im very upset that they only offer the hybrid power train as only choice i agree with you they should have given us just the turbo 6 as an option i definitely like the sequoia but wouldn't buy 1 because of hybrid only power train and im in the market for a big suv also thanks for the heads up on cargo space keep up good work
You are so right that is exactly what they should’ve Toyota should’ve did either you can option the ttv6 non hybrid engine or the ttv6 hybrid but if the customer does hybrid model you lose on the 3rd row capabilities and if you stick with the non hybrid model you gain the extra space in the 3rd row that would’ve been smart decision come on Toyota engineering 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️😂😂
Get the mdx type S instead then
As far as full size SUV’s go, I’ve always felt like the Tahoe and Suburban were by far the best.
A extended version could solve that inefficient trunk space. Come on Toyota! 😁
They would get significantly more sales. I hope they announce that soon.
I agree
ugh. really wanted one of these! the redesign looks so good, but toyota butchered the cargo area
For the "I simply must have a V8!" Crowd...
Nissan does still make the Armada and it's fully redesigned for 2022
True, but what does Nissan bring to the table that Toyota doesn’t?
If you like looks of a hipo
Nissans are junk.
The Armada is probably the only Japanese built in the segment and the 5.6 is a proven motor. I'm on the fence between the sequoia, expedition, and armada. Will be purchasing a new family bus once this market cools down. The expedition is what I'm gravitating to. I need something with a trunk for long trips. Not digging the solid axel. It may feel unsettled over bumps at higher speeds. I do like the looks of the sequoia a lot.
@@Erin-Thor probably nothing at all. In typical Toyota fashion they manage to _just_ be better than the doggiest of brands but that is absolutely it. . . No pushing the envelope.
No innovation worthy of a highlight.
Very informative….shame the truck looses height for my big dogs vs the previous model.