Amazing video. The only video if you ask me that addresses the first and major problem for wannabe digital artists, where to start, there is houdini and nuke which is industry standard, there is zbrush, there is maya, there is redshift, now unreal is getting ahead, you watch so many cgi car chase videos made in so many softwares, and are confused what to learn. This video nails the coffin of confusion. BLENDER! the software has come so far, and you can learn everything there, animation, sculpting, cloth simulation, effects, liquids simulations, everything in one spot, then you can shift to softwares that are specifically designed for each process. You can then model and design characters in zbrush, add effects in houdini, animate models in blender/maya, render your scene in unreal then composite on nuke or fusion with real footage. But before ALL this, you learn each of these basics at one spot which is blender. Amazing work my man!
dude just opens my eye about how it should be fun and not just stick to one course , and how we should do our scene without the guilt of skippin whatever source we're learning from
I don't think it would fully replace things. It can only understand so much, sometimes what's in your mind has to be done the original way, it just will help to make that easier.
Here from Eds channel. Great video dude! Only comment I have relates to your presentation style. Although you are very clear I think your Scandinavian laid-backless to your voice may cause some issues here and there. Don't go crazy though, you don't need to become someone else but maybe get some more levels to it. Higher energy moments, quieter more intimate moments that sort of thing. I've subbed. I really loved your video. I have done blender tuts in the past and I've always loved VfX and your video just ignited the passion in me again to get back on the case with it! Thank you for your awesome video. ❤
Thanks a lot for your feedback! Yeah, I still need to work on my presentation skills here and there, will try to incorporate it in my next video. Only thing is that I'm actually German and not Scandinavian ;)
@BSPStudios sorry I read your accent wrong there hehe. I guessed maybe Danish as I have some Danish family who have a very laid back / chilled English speaking style. Anyway - I've been binging VFX content this morning while I should have been working haha! I'd love to reach out once my channel is up and running anyhow. I'm a music guy but always looking for UA-cam friends/colleagues. X
bro, I prefer 3DSMAX, Maya, but for After Effects, Premiere Pro and Photoshop, those are my skills after 3D VFX, but for you, maybe it varies, maybe I like it because among you, they like Blender or Cinema 4D software, those are also good.
That explosion in the opening tells me that someone still needs to have a course on composting and some Houdini to add some interactive CG for the dirt hits 😂 and for compositing Israel Nuke it Davinci Fusion (I start to really like the latter and that coming from a 16 year long Nuke user).
@@BSPStudios you probably do not have a nuke license but natron is basically a nuke clone (nuke without 3D compositing). And of course Davinci Fusion is also a node based compositor. Node based compositors allow a far more organized (and reusable) way to composite shots compared to AE. AE is great for motion graphics but large composites really becomes a headache. And Nuke is the defacto standard compositor, so if you’d go into VFX professionally understanding node based compositors is a definite headache start. Good luck in your VFX quest! Coming form a former professional VFX artist (compositor, technical director)
Yeah, I see the advantages of Nuke and also definitely want to test it in the future. But for now I'm sticking with AE, as I don't fully agree that AE is only good for motion graphics
@@BSPStudios oh you can achieve pretty much anything compositing wise in AE as well. The problem is that soon you have many nested comps and then finding where something is can become challenging. And when you have a similar shot it’s hard to exchange the source footage. With nuke, natron Or Davinci you just point to the different footage and it all works. Which can increase your efficiency. Also using OpenEXR out of the box (perhaps AE by now supports that too, you used to need to have a plugin) and route the channels is really powerful and clean. But for small comps with few render layers AE does fine too.
I totally agree, if you have big comps with a lot of pre comps in it, everything can become really messy and hard to keep track of. OpenEXR has now native support though
You would actually be the next one on the list, but I didn't want to mention too many channels😂 But I am a big fan and am watching almost every video of yours
Keep up the great videos bro, your video quality is really good, which camera are you using?, plus I really encourage you to learn even the basics of a node based workflow like fusion or nuke, once I learned them, I feel the limitation once I use AE 😆I'm mainly a compositor so if you not interested so much in compositing and use it simply, AE is the way to go
Thanks a lot! I'm using the Sony alpha 6400 with the sigma 16mm f/1.4 lens. You are probably right about nuke. After effects has its limitations which is why they don't use it in the industry, but for now it works completely fine for me
Depends what you want to make. Blender is a no brainer if you are starting out, and can be a great hub for your projects even in various professional work. You only need software that's capable for what you're making. If your project is heavy on compositing with explosions then I'd recommend using a node based compositor like Nuke/Fusion. If you need highly realistic or bespoke simulations you may need to use Houdini or paid Blender addons.
3:55 No, After Effects can't do what Nuke can. Not even close. Fusion and Nuke are way ahead, when it comes to compositing. AE is only really strong for motion graphics. The engine runs in 2.5D, while Fusion and Nuke use a 3D engine.
I'm a freelance editor. I work in Premiere Pro. I'm now planning to learn After Effects. Can I do many things with these two softwares only? ( If I don't want to learn Blender)
Depends on what you want to do. You can do alot with After Effects, 3D models are the only limitation. But you can sometimes work around it with plug-ins like element 3d
After Effects is goid for motion graphics. It sucks at 3D compositing. Use Fusion or Nuke for that. Fusion is free in DaVinci Resolve. Nuke is the industry standard @@rudramukherjee9979
Pls I would like to know about blender rendering with another way ,kind of using rendering software. My pc is no enough cpu and gpu for rendering in blender.
AE does it automatically, so you have less control and the results might be worse. But it's also easier. Blender has the better tracker, so you could search for a tracking tutorial online. If you put in the time you can almost always get a good track. Some footage is just "not trackable" though, if there is not enough detail
Can anyone help me understand what fusion does compared to other softwares mentioned in the video ? Since am familiar with davinci for editing and coloring , I’d like to learn Fusion . So is there any limitations on fusion that I cannot do compared to other softwares ? Also MAC studio M2 Ultra can deal with all these VFX ?
Fusion doesn't has as many features as After Effects and nuke but a lot of 3D artists are still using it. So if you want to use it for composting your 3D renders its a great choice, if you want to do entire shots(like the portal in the intro) a compositing software would be better
Any professional VFX artist or compositor I've asked, will give the opposite reply. Fusion can do almost anything, Nuke can do and is far superior to After Effects. AE is only strong and better for motion graphics. AE has a 2.5 D engine, while the others have a true 3D engine.
@@BSPStudios Nuke and Fusion are on par for the most part. No professional would argue that Fusion has less features than After Effects for VFX, I appreciate you trying to help people but your advice has flaws.
In my opinion it is not a good place to start as a beginner. It is extremely powerful but only for artists who have already built a CG intuition. But yeah it is probably the most capable 3D software.
amazing video..right now iam pursuing a bachelor degree in multimedia and vfx... this video gave me a clarity to how to start learning vfx.. can i get your linkedin ID sir??
It’s not about blender. It’s about the render engine itself in blender (cycles and evee). If u want realistic results, then buy a render engine such as octane, redshift, or corona. So, u can work in blender and achieve realism.
There is no ai tool that can touch VFX yet and even in the image generating sector ai has not progressed much like if u give it to an industry person he'll tell you how many flaws are there in that image like it's completely made of flaws. PPL are not scared that ai is so good it's just that it's growing faster than we thought, but even with that there is still decades that ai will not replace artist
@@sudaygupta9300AI will never be creatively good enough for human consumption. It will still feel like AI. Which will make it good for variety in creativity but Humans will always be needed for great art. Although AI will change the landscape quite a lot.
Amazing video. The only video if you ask me that addresses the first and major problem for wannabe digital artists, where to start, there is houdini and nuke which is industry standard, there is zbrush, there is maya, there is redshift, now unreal is getting ahead, you watch so many cgi car chase videos made in so many softwares, and are confused what to learn. This video nails the coffin of confusion. BLENDER! the software has come so far, and you can learn everything there, animation, sculpting, cloth simulation, effects, liquids simulations, everything in one spot, then you can shift to softwares that are specifically designed for each process. You can then model and design characters in zbrush, add effects in houdini, animate models in blender/maya, render your scene in unreal then composite on nuke or fusion with real footage. But before ALL this, you learn each of these basics at one spot which is blender. Amazing work my man!
That's exactly the point, thanks a lot for your comment!
Great work. Good to see your still on the track😊
dude just opens my eye about how it should be fun and not just stick to one course , and how we should do our scene without the guilt of skippin whatever source we're learning from
Even in full CG scenes you should always do proper compositing to make the renders look like they actually come from a camera
That's true, but the blender compositor will mostly work just fine for that. Otherwise davinci resolve would work
War ein tolles Video
Dankeee für den überblick
Ich nutze blender schon ne zeit lang und hab trotzdem nen großen Mehrwert bekommen
kudos on the effort! shows your passion you will go a long way in vfx.
I don't think it would fully replace things. It can only understand so much, sometimes what's in your mind has to be done the original way, it just will help to make that easier.
Great video, really informative and I followed most of these steps that you mentioned and it worked out great for me.
Here from Eds channel. Great video dude! Only comment I have relates to your presentation style. Although you are very clear I think your Scandinavian laid-backless to your voice may cause some issues here and there. Don't go crazy though, you don't need to become someone else but maybe get some more levels to it. Higher energy moments, quieter more intimate moments that sort of thing. I've subbed. I really loved your video. I have done blender tuts in the past and I've always loved VfX and your video just ignited the passion in me again to get back on the case with it! Thank you for your awesome video. ❤
Thanks a lot for your feedback! Yeah, I still need to work on my presentation skills here and there, will try to incorporate it in my next video. Only thing is that I'm actually German and not Scandinavian ;)
@BSPStudios sorry I read your accent wrong there hehe. I guessed maybe Danish as I have some Danish family who have a very laid back / chilled English speaking style. Anyway - I've been binging VFX content this morning while I should have been working haha! I'd love to reach out once my channel is up and running anyhow. I'm a music guy but always looking for UA-cam friends/colleagues. X
No problem mate! Great to hear that you watched some VFX content. Sure, you can just reach out via instagram: @bspstudios_
bro, I prefer 3DSMAX, Maya, but for After Effects, Premiere Pro and Photoshop, those are my skills after 3D VFX, but for you, maybe it varies, maybe I like it because among you, they like Blender or Cinema 4D software, those are also good.
thx boss!
Great video as usual, and lots of useful information too! Keep it up.
I want to learn animation in maya 😊
Can u teach us maya cinema 4d & after effects??
Love from India ❤
Ian Hubert is now active on patreon.
thank you, this video helps a lot,
bro your voice is like a super villains voice
Loved this this video, thank you so much. What about using Unreal Engine, any tips/channels?
Blender is definitely industry standard in lots of production companies. At least in LA. Might be different in other countries
Absolutly not
@@jno8039 its not different in other countries?
Not in any major VFX companies. Game companies like Ubisoft sure.
Excellent video. Thank you for all the advise.
I advice you to edit your comment.
That explosion in the opening tells me that someone still needs to have a course on composting and some Houdini to add some interactive CG for the dirt hits 😂 and for compositing Israel Nuke it Davinci Fusion (I start to really like the latter and that coming from a 16 year long Nuke user).
Sure, I still got a lot to learn, which is why this video is only about how to start learning VFX
@@BSPStudios you probably do not have a nuke license but natron is basically a nuke clone (nuke without 3D compositing). And of course Davinci Fusion is also a node based compositor. Node based compositors allow a far more organized (and reusable) way to composite shots compared to AE. AE is great for motion graphics but large composites really becomes a headache.
And Nuke is the defacto standard compositor, so if you’d go into VFX professionally understanding node based compositors is a definite headache start.
Good luck in your VFX quest! Coming form a former professional VFX artist (compositor, technical director)
Yeah, I see the advantages of Nuke and also definitely want to test it in the future. But for now I'm sticking with AE, as I don't fully agree that AE is only good for motion graphics
@@BSPStudios oh you can achieve pretty much anything compositing wise in AE as well. The problem is that soon you have many nested comps and then finding where something is can become challenging. And when you have a similar shot it’s hard to exchange the source footage. With nuke, natron Or Davinci you just point to the different footage and it all works. Which can increase your efficiency.
Also using OpenEXR out of the box (perhaps AE by now supports that too, you used to need to have a plugin) and route the channels is really powerful and clean.
But for small comps with few render layers AE does fine too.
I totally agree, if you have big comps with a lot of pre comps in it, everything can become really messy and hard to keep track of. OpenEXR has now native support though
Hey!!
You forgot to mention my channel!! 😂😂
😂
You would actually be the next one on the list, but I didn't want to mention too many channels😂
But I am a big fan and am watching almost every video of yours
please create more advanced tutorial series also nuke or After Effect
Art to animation to vfx …..an order one can follow .
0:42, Oh so that's why we have all of these "Green Screen Kids" now. 😲
Video quality 🔥
Which laptop you can recommend? For vfx and 3d
What keyboard mouse do you use? What are your pc specs??
amazing video. Please use a better microphone. your voice doesn't sound in good clarity.
Keep up the great videos bro, your video quality is really good, which camera are you using?, plus I really encourage you to learn even the basics of a node based workflow like fusion or nuke, once I learned them, I feel the limitation once I use AE 😆I'm mainly a compositor so if you not interested so much in compositing and use it simply, AE is the way to go
Thanks a lot! I'm using the Sony alpha 6400 with the sigma 16mm f/1.4 lens.
You are probably right about nuke. After effects has its limitations which is why they don't use it in the industry, but for now it works completely fine for me
I learning to do VFX with blender. I dont use AE i have FCPX and Apple Motion.
How’s that?
So basically blender with after effects is the best combo for VFX?
At least when starting out, in my opinion
Depends what you want to make. Blender is a no brainer if you are starting out, and can be a great hub for your projects even in various professional work. You only need software that's capable for what you're making. If your project is heavy on compositing with explosions then I'd recommend using a node based compositor like Nuke/Fusion. If you need highly realistic or bespoke simulations you may need to use Houdini or paid Blender addons.
Can you make a full roadmap of how to become a VFX artist?
😂my guy you won't find such. You must first find yourself first what you like and what you want to do with this technology.
3:55 No, After Effects can't do what Nuke can. Not even close. Fusion and Nuke are way ahead, when it comes to compositing. AE is only really strong for motion graphics. The engine runs in 2.5D, while Fusion and Nuke use a 3D engine.
Yeah there's a reason Nuke is industry standard
Awesome setup
I need a 15 sec commercial with special effects. Can anyone give me a price pls?
I’m waiting for runway ml to do this.
It already can
Sehr gut gemacht 🎉🎉
Gutes Video! 💪💪
Hello can you suggest a software for low end pc i tried blender but it to laggy and it render quality not good
nice bro, please keep continue
Nice best explanation good❤😊😊
god bless, so helpful
Thank you
Nice video keep growing ❤
Hey bro Can u explain how to do the effect in 0:04
Film Riot already did a really good tutorial on it: ua-cam.com/video/H6cW2SjgOzs/v-deo.htmlsi=c1H65i8d8uLvt1ld
😂AI must shape up the VFX and CGIs to make visuals a lot of fun.
5600+ 3060 12gb enough for blender?
My Debts Clear!!!!!
Very nice!
great video! the links to the ppl you recommended are broken tho, nbd, still easy to find just a bit inconvenient
Thanks for letting me know! Fixed them now
@@BSPStudios no problem at all! have a great day!
epic vfx academy is closed forever?
I'm a freelance editor. I work in Premiere Pro. I'm now planning to learn After Effects. Can I do many things with these two softwares only? ( If I don't want to learn Blender)
Depends on what you want to do. You can do alot with After Effects, 3D models are the only limitation. But you can sometimes work around it with plug-ins like element 3d
@@BSPStudios ok thanks bro
After Effects is goid for motion graphics. It sucks at 3D compositing. Use Fusion or Nuke for that. Fusion is free in DaVinci Resolve. Nuke is the industry standard @@rudramukherjee9979
loved this
You were recommending ae tutorials and videocopilot wasnt the first to come out ? Wow andrew kremer .
His videos are amazing, but he doesn't upload anymore, so I didn't mention him
Pls I would like to know about blender rendering with another way ,kind of using rendering software. My pc is no enough cpu and gpu for rendering in blender.
You could use EEVEE, which is a different render engine built into blender. Its not as realistic as cycles but it renders in realtime
Thanks bro for suggestions
check out cgfast track if you are serious
This looks exciting 🙌🔥✨
Is this real? There will be a hard future for animators and VFX artists? What do experts say about it?
How to create this viedo 😮😮😮
Yoooooo a german! Niceee! Grüße aus dem Schwarzwald! Where are you from?
Nice! Grüße zurück! Komme aus der Nähe von Köln
Please what is the name of your channel?
a content to be reviewed
I have found it hard to track a scene in Blender for vfx, and it doesnt` look realistic in Blender, is it better in
AE?
AE does it automatically, so you have less control and the results might be worse. But it's also easier. Blender has the better tracker, so you could search for a tracking tutorial online. If you put in the time you can almost always get a good track. Some footage is just "not trackable" though, if there is not enough detail
@@BSPStudios and which software you can recommend? Or they both are essential for vfx
They both work hand in hand
What is your mic brand and model number ?
I am using the rode wireless go with a lavalier mic
@@BSPStudios thanks bro
Thats cool
Can anyone help me understand what fusion does compared to other softwares mentioned in the video ? Since am familiar with davinci for editing and coloring , I’d like to learn Fusion . So is there any limitations on fusion that I cannot do compared to other softwares ? Also MAC studio M2 Ultra can deal with all these VFX ?
Fusion doesn't has as many features as After Effects and nuke but a lot of 3D artists are still using it. So if you want to use it for composting your 3D renders its a great choice, if you want to do entire shots(like the portal in the intro) a compositing software would be better
Any professional VFX artist or compositor I've asked, will give the opposite reply. Fusion can do almost anything, Nuke can do and is far superior to After Effects.
AE is only strong and better for motion graphics.
AE has a 2.5 D engine, while the others have a true 3D engine.
@@BSPStudios Nuke and Fusion are on par for the most part. No professional would argue that Fusion has less features than After Effects for VFX, I appreciate you trying to help people but your advice has flaws.
Encouraging
You sound just like Karl Lagerfeld 😱
🤣🤣💀 He's German, that the only similarity I see
@@BSPStudios listen to Karl Lagerfeld, then you will understand ☺️
Why does anyone never talk about Houdini?
In my opinion it is not a good place to start as a beginner. It is extremely powerful but only for artists who have already built a CG intuition. But yeah it is probably the most capable 3D software.
isn't it important to learn basics of video editing before jumping into the world of vfx???
Knowing video editing will definitely help you, but it's not necessary
Will these software's work with RTX3050
Sure!
I love you
Who is your video editor? lots of things need to be fixed.
I edit them myself, lol. What do you dislike?
improve sound quality after intro@@BSPStudios
for now just fix the voice quality @@BSPStudios
and congrats you got new subscriber .
Brother what pc requirements needs to this process?
It will be easier with good hardware, similar to a gaming pc, but you don't need the perfect hardware to start with.
@@BSPStudiosHow about MAC studio M2 Ultra ?
Works great, especially for After Effects. For Blender windows would be better but the M2 Ultra still works great
op brother
Make real gost with cgi video
Good
Ah höre ich da nen deutschen Akzent? 😳
good
I do but I don’t that bad 😂
Epic VFX Academy Is Closed Forever. LOL
amazing video..right now iam pursuing a bachelor degree in multimedia and vfx... this video gave me a clarity to how to start learning vfx.. can i get your linkedin ID sir??
Glad the video could help you, but I don't have a linkedin ID yet
This 1 min.. beg doun p.lsss 😊😊😊😊😊
I don't know
Ok
Filming live action western movies 🎥 cartoon film in New York City 🌆 morning 3-d
virtual animation,
ey du bist doch save deutsch bei dem dialekt haha
Día vici resovel
Virtual animation cartoon in 3-d animation cartoon brave star 🌟 he man and she RA
ua-cam.com/video/3dmGiyJ4bIw/v-deo.html
Such a sexy voice!
Blender lacks photorealism and all renders look eatheir very artificial or like from cartoon movie.
Right, all blender's renders look like sh*t compare to 3ds max, maya and cinema 4d.
@@laurti I am not talking only about my renders.
It’s not about blender. It’s about the render engine itself in blender (cycles and evee). If u want realistic results, then buy a render engine such as octane, redshift, or corona. So, u can work in blender and achieve realism.
@@al7bndgsh706 I don't think, that vray or corona is compatible with Blender.
Skill issue
you too young to have a deep voice like that😂
VIDEO COPILOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MUST BE REVIEVEED
VFX using AE and Blender. Teach us, grifter.🤡
Bro do not improve ure vc ure not vo u are ContentC ( cuz ure voice aren't clear )
Manual vfx is dead.
Automatic VFX don't even exist xD
There is no ai tool that can touch VFX yet and even in the image generating sector ai has not progressed much like if u give it to an industry person he'll tell you how many flaws are there in that image like it's completely made of flaws. PPL are not scared that ai is so good it's just that it's growing faster than we thought, but even with that there is still decades that ai will not replace artist
@@sudaygupta9300AI will never be creatively good enough for human consumption. It will still feel like AI. Which will make it good for variety in creativity but Humans will always be needed for great art. Although AI will change the landscape quite a lot.
Just like hitler
Show me your work.
Use cinema 4d, blender is gay