Bigfoot - Patterson/Gimlin Film | Stabilized | 10/20/1967
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лис 2016
- This is a stabilized version of the famous Patterson/Gimlin footage from Bluff Creek, California, filmed, on 20 October 1967.
Footage stabilized by M.K. Davis.
Original source: / patterson_film_stabilized
Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot Film - Complete Version: • Video
M.K. Davis Discusses the Best Images from the Patterson/Gimlin Film: • M K Davis discusses th...
Patterson Bigfoot Film: Slow Motion Clip with Breast Enhancement: • Patterson Bigfoot Film...
M.K. Davis Discusses a Recently Published Article About Objections to the Patterson Bigfoot Footage: • M.K.Davis discusses a ...
The Truth is Out There: Bigfoot Revealed: • Bigfoot Revealed
#Bigfoot #Sasquatch #PattersonGimlin #RogerPatterson #BobGimlin #Yeti #AbominableSnowman #SkunkApe #Yowie #BluffCreek #California - Домашні улюбленці та дикі тварини
*Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot Film (Complete Version):* ua-cam.com/video/OBTUQI60yqQ/v-deo.html&feature=emb_title
*M.K. Davis Discusses the Best Images from the Patterson/Gimlin Film:* ua-cam.com/video/21mSCHOYbQU/v-deo.html
*Patterson Bigfoot Film: Slow Motion Clip with Breast Enhancement:* ua-cam.com/video/iG0oO6c-SlY/v-deo.html&app=desktop
*M.K. Davis Discusses a Recently Published Article About Objections to the Patterson Bigfoot Footage:* ua-cam.com/video/_Mx36mCZyh4/v-deo.html
*The Proof is Out There: Bigfoot Revealed:* ua-cam.com/video/AJwtMgq1ERQ/v-deo.html
It wanted to be seen here.
Seriously. .Look at the messages its sending the viewers (to the public). . .
It walks away calmly with the look of that, (in which) it intends to be up to VERY SERIOUS BUSSINESS.
It, (BigFoot) [also] in this footage, has no problem walking away as it takes a quick look back at it's (potential/possible) prey/predators.
He or she (BigFoot) does not feel threatened by the people/persons filming itself.
It knows the humans cause no potential threat to it. It (Bigfoot) does not run or even pick up it's pace like most "animals" would (like deers, cats, birds, etc...) due to the state of mind in which it seems to be in (confident/not too concerned).
Keep in mind, BigFoot supposedly kidnaps people and eats (cooks) them. [Do your research).
There are these "missing people's" cases (covered by David P.) that occur in these "National Parks and Forests where people simply vanish and are never found.
This creature (BigFoot) could be the reason for these "missing people's cases".
They call the
This is real footage. . .And may be the only real footage of it (due to it's reclusive nature).
BigFoot wants to be known, but only this much...for now (at least).
@@isaacrobles4980 Yup, high as f#ck alright....LOL....boob.
It's a fake, a man in a suit
"As bob ( who wore the costume) said later, he walked fast in the suit because not only was he very hot, but he was worried someone may shoot at him"
@@joelaw5207 Why hasn’t someone reproduced the film using a man in a suit and see.
Real or not, this film really has a charm that's lasted the test of time and there's no denying how iconic it's become. Iconic both for Bigfoot, and for cryptids as a whole. Bigfoot probably wouldn't be as popular of a character as it is today if it weren't for this.
I've been trying to get his autograph since.
That's real bigfoot not a fake
Your right, there’s just this indescribable vibe this video gives off, that I don’t think can ever be replicated. Even if this video turns out to be a hoax, I will still always appreciate this footage. Glad someone else agrees.
It's not real it's a fake, the creator admitted it
I agree I do like that the video is embedded in the environment so you can actually see its relation in traversing effect it does add to the Nostalgia mistake
Bigfoot is unfortunately one of those things where we're going to have to have some sort of irrefutable proof to ever verify it this document here it's just too grainy we can't make heads or tails of it and had there been something else materializes it is a urban legend at best a fabrication it works but like I said I like you said this little vignette has a charm to it just what if it was true
@@permiekthere's been so much back and forth I don't think we'll ever really know it's one of those Urban Realms where it take it with a grain of salt and try let your mind sort it out I think it's certainly possible that something could have been missing from modern society but to this extent all these years later putting people on the moon the internet splitting the atom we would have seen these bastards walking around if they were real but it doesn't mean they didn't exist at some point or like Neolithic tribes still
It’s actually a man wearing fur suit but the suit is made from real Bigfoot skin so everybody is technically right.
This is why I read UA-cam comments! 😁
Lol
😂
Damn, 1950s furries were hardcore
If that were true then we would have DNA of it.
"George, they're onto us!"
CrackAlecIn *stares confusedly at the tv*
Let’s get outta here
shut up you weird fuck.
Im sorry but could you please make more sense.
"Cartoon running effects"
I don’t think Bigfoot would be nearly as famous as he is today if not for this footage. Whether real or not, this video is the perfect encapsulation of the mysteriousness of nature. Personally, I kind of hope this video never get proven, as it really is the ultimate mystery.
Not it isn't, you just have a boiled potato instead of a brain.
They are 100% real
No, I hope it gets proven. And I think it is a fake video.
Lol it's been proven fake like 20 years ago. It was a man named Ray Wallace.
It's been proven real already. Her many real muscle contractions while walking are impossible to display in a suit.
Making my way down town walking fast
And I need you, dadadadadadada, and I miss you, dadadadadadada, and now I wonder.
@Noartist That was, feel old yet?
Pla-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket - I'm finna kill you
Pla-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket - I'm finna drill you
Pla-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket-ket - And now you bleeding
Faces pass and I’m homebownd
Bound lol
That footage was stabilized by MK Davis. You should give him credit.
Thank you for that information. Will do. I wasn’t sure who stabilized it, thus, I merely cited the original link where I discovered the clip.
At least someone remembers the shaky footage besides me. I was 5 years old in 69 I remember the news footage, some tv specials. The in 72 The Ledgand of Boggy Creek came out (my neighbors dad took all the guys) with the Stablized Patti film.
Can someone help me out here, my husband swears this was debunked kind of like the guy who filmed it admired it was fake, whereas I don't remember hearing this and am sure he didn't come out and say it was fake? Someone help me as I'm sure he is wrong. Thanks 😀💞
@@spindarella The two guys who filmed it, Patterson and Gimlin, Patterson is dead and never backtracked on his story, Gimlin is still alive and still sticks to his story. There was another man who said they had paid him to wear the suit, something that the other two vehemently denied. So you’re husband is wrong you’ll be glad to hear 😉
Lost all respect for the guy after his ridiculous ‘massacre’ claims.
whatever it was, it was not in a hurry.
After decades of human torment, Patty's stoic attitude to these people filming her highlight her defiance towards us
It was a man in a suit
@@bloodhound1182 wow how cringe. You should marry this bigfoot if you understand her so well
@@agentmoron747I like how the smartest people can’t figure out if this is fake but internet shits like you just say “Fake” or “Man in a suit” after watching it once
@@jamon6internet shits is wild
That's me walking out the door after I tell my boss I quit my job
😄
😆
😂😂
What I find funny, is that despite many zoologists, anthropologists, academics, doctors, special effects experts from major studios studying the tape closely and not able to come to a definitive conclusion; that even amongst staunch sceptics the general consensus is that "If this is a fake, it's a very good one", meaning while they have doubts they can't prove that it's fake. Yet on the Internet you have all these random people pointing out how "obviously fake" this is after watching it a couple of times.
People who speak so self-assuredly as to use phrases like, “obviously fake,” are not very nuanced in their thinking. A more objective answer would be to say, ‘I don’t know.’ When someone says it this subject is “obviously fake,” or something of that nature, they are making an objective truth claim, thus, the onus is on them to support that claim with - not just evidence - but objective proof. When one asks them for that, they will give some farce of an answer that doesn’t even remotely support their claim and or they will call into question the intelligence of dissenters.
I mean, the dude looked back directly at the camera, then kept going. A wild creature wouldn’t have just been like “meh, whatever, see that all the time” and keep walking.
Marit Vambheim lol so? That’s a pet dog, not a untamed wild primate in its own domain facing an intruder with a strange contraption
Marit Vambheim ah I see. I misunderstood, my bad
Thanks for the explanation, you must be an expert on animals behavior
It’s honestly both frightening and impressive how much distance this thing can cover that fast just by calmly walking
Ikr it only took her 15 steps to get to where the video ended while it takes most humans way more then that
Should see me on my way to 7-11
This thing? He is just a man under a suit
@@mauroivan2062 u have no proof, there’s more proof of how it’s real then how it’s fake.
You have no reference for size. How can you say it covers alot of ground quickly?
It looks like it’s covering a whole lot of distance quickly even though it’s just walking
@Mojopin1983 I read that before he died, Patterson said that he wish he just shot the creature instead of recording it to prove that it was real... imagine if that action had been taken, although sad that it would’ve been killed, what would’ve happened afterward? How would the discovered specimen affect us? it’s just so much to think about. Thanks for posting this video by the way and reading this if you do
Interesting. I hadn’t heard that story.
You’re welcome. Thanks goes to M.K. Davis, who made this enhanced version of the footage.
@@maritvambheim5899 because his film is a hoax.
Would've been worth it, and I love animals + nature.
I am a personal friend of Bob Gimlin, and that statement, according to Bob, is true. Gimlin was next to Patterson's death bed when he told gimlin he'd rather have left her alone...
Patterson admitted it was a hoax.
I'm starting to believe this. If this was a hoax then that means that a random guy in the 60s made a suit better than anything a professional could make. Even today this would be a incredibly impressive suit. Then never tried to profit off of it and never came clean. It seems like a hell of a hoax
Not really and impressive suit. It is an old camera that is over 30 yards away. It is probably just a well made gorilla suit and the guy isn't even tall.
@@liammitchell8568 there are only two possibilities here. It’s either a man in a gorilla suit or it’s really Bigfoot.
This does not look or feel like a man in a gorilla suit.
@@liammitchell8568 Not impressive? The muscles moved too naturally, the arms were too long and a human would need a prosthetic hand extended which didn’t even exist. Might wanna look more into it than giving your expert opinion on a 10 second video that’s been analyzed for 53 years.
Didn’t try to profit? The guy shopped it around to networks until he died a few years after it was filmed and made a 75k deal to have it featured in a documentary.
@@liammitchell8568 you seem really smart.
I remain skeptical, however, this is remains the most impressive "Bigfoot" film I've ever seen. This creature is walking away from a potential threat in a very convincing, yet not fearful way as I would expect such a large animal to do. In other such films, the so called "Bigfoot" just ambles around in circles to make sure it can be seen, makes very limited movements or is so far away that no clear identification can be made. Thought provoking for sure.
For that very reason it leads me to a strong and opposite conclusion: It was staged. What is convincing is how this Bigfoot is so nonchalant. Tiptoe through the Tuuuulips. LoL.
@Macht Nichts Sei Mann
That was my reaction, the thing doesn't seem to care in the slightest.
I've never seen ANY large (or any size) wild animal behave like that unless they are rabid or something.
You can see that sort of behavior in tame animals, or those utterly bored with humans like at a zoo.
Look at its butt. That's a suit.
Proven real after forensic tests of origin of 16mm film 2021-22. The female Humanoid even has a hair tie and ponytail. A massive wound to left thigh. Ape is the false Narrative. Human yes. This gives credit to Native Americans who traded with these tribes we call Bigfoot. Females mostly wore ponytails. Evidence is overwhelming so go to Missing 411 with Dave p. He strated yet another series 1-10 so 2 shows us everything about the testing and blowup of orginal 16 mm and computer science systems.
@@williamhatcher4795 look at the face. That's what makes me doubt it. You can see a human face.
@@williamhatcher4795 suit makes have said it wouldve been impossible to make something like that in that day and age.
Bigfoot taking a stroll when the paparazzi shows up, Mrs. Bigfoot over here! 😄
Discussion regarding this film in a few minutes on Coast to Coast AM - thanks for the upload.
You’re welcome. Thanks goes to the person who stabilized the film. I merely grabbed this off Reddit and posted it here.
Yes sure this is iconic footage but I never understood why the Paul Freeman footage has not had as much coverage. That one looks the most real, clear cut genuine video of all of them IMO.
can u send the link cuz I don’t think I’ve ever seen that
@@kingong4185 ua-cam.com/video/ut6GDA0wG3M/v-deo.html
@@kingong4185 @ 4:47 mark
The blurrier it is, the more people believe it 🤣🤣🤣
The person in the suit was Bob Heironimus. Find he was there at the time in 1967, and dear friend of Roger Patterson who bought the costume from Philip Morris, he worked in the circus. and suit was 'Girl to Gorilla' costume.
look at how bent and squatted the legs are the entire time while still taking massive steps
I DONT CARE WHAT PEOPLE SAY, THIS IS A REAL BIGFOOT!!!!!!!!
Blindly believe in it.
Such a stunning performance. I was truly moved and got very emotional. Bigfoot is very talented and such a timeless icon. I hope someday he does a meet and greet and is able to address his fans for the first time.
Do you think?
Wtf someone I know just brought up this film and mentioned that this “Bigfoot” was female because it had clear breasts, and sure enough it does. I believe I’ve seen this video like dozens of times growing up and never realized that. That’s really interesting because female gorillas do not have breasts, so a gorilla suit wouldn’t have them either and making a change to a suit to add them would just be weird and unnecessary. Changes how I look at this film honestly.
Check out the content in the pinned comment for a closer examination of the film.
Thanks, the stabilization enhances the film a lot! I like a lot of people dismissed this footage as a hoax, but I just don’t think I can outright debunk it anymore. The creature in the film does look human-like but some of the details like the stride of its walk is intriguing.
The fact that this was a female just changes a lot for me. I’m far from an experienced outdoorsman or anything, but I have had encounters with wild animals including a brown bear that I remember vividly. People laugh at the idea that this Bigfoot just walked away, but that’s exactly how this female bear reacted to me. She was about 100 yards away and her Cubs were playing a little bit to her left (I didn’t even see them at first because I was so scared of the mom). Upon seeing me she stared at me with a “WTF face” then slowly walked towards her kids, stopping to look back at me twice to determine if I was walking towards her or presenting a threat to her and her Cubs.
Maybe it’s more human then it is ape
I couldn't see her breasts for the longest time either. Thats because I was looking into her eyes 😉
😭🤣
Bigfoot: la la la la I love taking a walk
Everyone: HES SO SCARY!!!!!!
The walk seems so natural yet unnatural at the same time. At first, I dismissed it as a human in a suit clearly walking. But then I saw the footage again and just tried to recreate the motion of walking. I simply couldn't. The unusual bend at the knee when it lifts it's legs is quite weird. It seems to be such an inefficient way to walk. We have high quality costumes available now. I would urge Skeptics and debunkers to recreate this footage frame by frame.I think it would be quite interesting.
To me, it seems like he walks like Chewbacca. Which was a man in a Wookiee suit.
it is funny and sad at the same time how many people still have no clue that the people who faked it have admitted to it
especially since we live in an age where 7 seconds of googling would reveal that
@@HECKproductions I'm a sceptic on this film but the stories of the people who claimed to have faked it are dubious,at best
@@HECKproductions Source? I looked this up after and couldn't find Patterson or Gimlin admitting to faking it
@@HECKproductions where did you get that info from? Bob gimlin never admitted to faking it.
I just subscribed for the Jeff Buckley videos, but I also love bigfoot, so wow great content on this channel!
@modmouse11 Thanks. Just to let you know that many of my videos will be temporarily unlisted soon, as I recently lost my UA-cam partner status and need to reapply.
@@MojoPin1983 oh no, sad, well I hope you get it back again soon. If they are unlisted, I think that they can still be viewed if the videos have been added to playlists. I added a lot of your videos to a private playlist I have. But if you private the videos, then for sure no one will be able to view them.
Just some hippy that missed his drive to Woodstock so he had to walk.
This video was taken in 1967. Woodstock was in 1969.
@@MojoPin1983 I know. He wanted to be early.
@@MojoPin1983 r/wooosh
You mean "she."
@@boztos6025 No. Transfoot.
What I really like about this is how smooth the walk is. Head isn’t bouncing like how a human would walk. And hundreds of witnesses report noticing that they don’t bounce when they walk, they sort of glide like what is seen in this film, very interesting.
THIS IS A BIG HOAX FILM.
He walks excatcly like a human would. Watch how real primates walk , it's different
It's a guy in a gorilla suit walking through the woods holy shit lol
ua-cam.com/video/WVegHHmZ028/v-deo.html
@WindupAtheist oh you were there?
Impressive neat straight line walk at exactly the same speed when turning your head for 2 seconds out in the open multi terrain wilderness.
What did you mean by this
A comma or semi-colon would be swell
@@bingbong8649 it's the name of his new album
It clearly slowed down when it turned its head. Why would that be so impressive to you anyways?
@@calebwatson5144try walking in a straight line in a forest with an uneven ground, all while twisting your head away from the ground and your direction of travel. It’s pretty hard to do without falling, stumbling or tripping.
I'm not totally sure where I should stand when it comes to what the "bigfoot" phenomenon could really be, but what I find interesting is how people continually and have always tried to downplay these types of things with jokes while making the boldest claims to what it is. You can easily pick out the ones who see this subject as a hobby, and the know it alls that think we've seen it all, apart from those who are actually open minded enough to accept that *maybe* we have yet to understand everything about how our world operates.
It's literally the exact opposite. It is interesting how people claim it's real because they WANT it to be real. The mind can play tricks on you when emotions are involved. I used to be one of them. I hoped this footage was the real deal but it's just obvious now with the enhanced, stabilized version that it's a man in a suit.
@@VCthaGOATdunker I wouldn't make it seem as if it's 'only' the exact opposite who let emotions alter their thinking in these debates. There are for sure people who don't want anything more than for Bigfoot to be real and will pull just about anything from their ass but the same goes for those who continually lunge themselves in discussions that should really be irrelevant to them, and proceed to go back and forth with others.
@@Beforezzz Why should it be irrelevant to the others? You're a group making astronomical claims about a giant bipedal primate roaming around North America undetected, using videos like this as your scientific evidence and you don't expect sceptics to respond to those claims? It sounds to me, with all due respect, that you would prefer to stay an off-grid online group that won't get challenged. There's reddit and other places for that, not youtube. On here, people will tell you if they think something is not right. "Patty" is a guy in a suit in my unbiased eyes.
@@Beforezzz Also one other thing. Why do you guys act like it's a personal insult towards you if someone happens to think the footage is a hoax? That's what I mean with the emotional bias. People WANT it to be real.
@no info This is some piping hot nonsense, my friend
Without a doubt best footage I have ever seen.
Without doubt the best footage of a large man wearing a gorilla costume walking I agree
@donjohn2695 😂lol😂
You cant see flesh and muscle through a costume.@@donjohn2695
@@donjohn2695The person in the suit was Bob Heironimus. Find he was there at the time in 1967, and dear friend of Roger Patterson who bought the costume from Philip Morris, he worked in the circus. and suit was 'Girl to Gorilla' costume.
@@Paul_G73Do you even have proof bro?
I doubt the existence of Bigfoot, but this footage today still remains to be by far the most convincing of any cryptid ever. And the fact that it still hasn’t been disproven and remains this authentic looking after over 50 years tells me maybe it can be real
Hate to burst your bubble but that doesn't mean the film is real, far from it. It cuts both ways, and you gotta consider the fact that nobody has ever offered smoking gun evidence that the bigfoot in the film is REAL, along with the lack of evidence and logistical issue regarding its existence. Occam's razor means it's fake.
ever? theres atleast 25 crypdits that were proven true...trust me more often these things are true than not...stop being a sceptic to the point of denying truth
I have been an avid Bigfoot believer for 16 years. This video is my life.
Bigfoot isn't biologically impossible at all
My friend Cesar walks like this.
I thought U said u didn’t say ‘biiiiiiiiiiitch.’
Damn. Shots fired.
caesar from planet of the apes
No it was my Thick Ass Amazon friend.
tell him I said hi..
Its the souls of the feet for me. Thats a lot of detail to go to for a costume. They’re grey and leathery looking and have toes!
How can you see the feet?
Fake feet are not hard to make.
@@JohnyG29 I'm pretty sure if the imagineers at disney couldn't recreate it you couldn't either dip shit.
Just want to lay out the details that have been found about this film since it was taken. The gait that can be observed is incredibly difficult if not impossible for humans to replicate in a controlled environment, let alone in a cobbled creek while wearing an ape suit. The supposed suit itself has never been found, though its alleged maker and wearer have attempted to admit their involvement publicly. Notably, the two men’s description of the suit differs in fairly significant ways. It should also be noted that the technology to replicate the muscular movement that can be seen in the film in a practical costume would not exist until years later, and attempts to remake the film with a costume have been unsuccessful. The shape and form of the animal itself is consistent with an understanding of pre-human hominid morphology that did not exist as of its filming, meaning the designer of the alleged suit was either really lucky or a time traveller. This film has not managed to be credibly debunked for 55 years, even after so many hoaxes have came about and been debunked in that period. It has weathered scientific and forensic advances and came out looking more probable than it did before. If it is a hoax, and i have yet to come across a convincing argument to that point, it is the greatest hoax of all time. Those who have spoken to Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin have described them as, to put it bluntly, too stupid to execute a hoax this good. I don’t know if i believe in bigfoot, but i definitely believe in this video.
You could say the same thing about Santa. THEY NEVER FOUND HIS SLED, THEY NEVER FOUND HIS SLED!! 😂😂😂
Lmao this is really funny actually
I didn’t know Bigfoot wore a backpack
These replies have to be some of the dumbest things I've ever seen and I'm a skeptical person.
@@igkgigohnobody is claiming Santa is real and nobody claims to have a genuine footage of a real character that flies around on Christmas and gives people toys.
The figure in the film has already been determined, judging by the size of the trees around it to be 7 to 8 ft tall. I don't know what it is but as footage has yet to be debunked.
I've seen zoomed in footage of the toes and you can clearly see the toes bending naturally, no way a costume could do this. Plus look at the length of the arms passing around the knee, no human has arms long enough to reach the knees when walking normally.
Also the hands opening and closing, there’s no physical way to do that in a costume if it was a man in a costume. Those arms are so much longer that there is no way it’s a man in a suit, the hands opening and closing prove it. You couldn’t make your arms longer in a suit and somehow open and close your hands. This video is incredible evidence.
My arms come very close to my knees when normally walking
@@zynnertime1 People can be very ingenious, maybe there was some sort of contraption or pulley system in the suit where if you pull, the hand will open and close. I think people are greatly underestimating the clever ways people get round things.
@@Adammeehan the one I seen moved the same way as in bending of the knees and walking. This one in the Patterson film was a female. The one I seen was a male. It's shoulders were the size of medicine balls.
@@Adammeehan do you know how many people have claimed to have seen them. I can tell you they're not all lying. And if you ever do see one the shock value is so high you're going to be scared for your life just due to what your eyes are seeing and at that point what's even worse is your brain can't process it because your seeing something most of the world believes isn't real, when it is right there in front of you. Most people just flat out shut down in the moment hence why people can't seem to get videos or great pictures. These things are unknown to humans and their capabilities are beyond our imagination, they've avoided people humans for this long and still most don't believe.. they're 10000000% gifted or have a deeper meaning to this life.. people shut down for months or years if not the rest of their life after seeing one who were outdoorsy people all in one sudden moment turned to a homebody. nobody can help these type of things from happening it's natural. You see something that much bigger than you that's not supposed to be real and you start questioning things you didn't before. It's like people have to see one literally to believe, it's ridiculous. Anyway just know these things are out there and they're not going anywhere. And if you do want to go looking go out at night without any phones or camera gear because they know your domesticated intentions everytime. Try making whoops/ calls, wood knocks to communicate with them and be consistent and do it every night and be subtle about it. It won't take long bud I've done it for 2 years now. They will communicate with you in their way. We interest them but don't blame me when you hear or potentially see one and don't say I didn't tell you so because I know what will happen especially when mfckrs got common sense then it really won't take long.
I didn't give you permission to record me..
Idc
First amendment laws dude , u cant arrest me for filming in public.
Goodness if Bigfoot was a liberal we'd all be dead
@@theblackpearl3880 Bigfoot Karen???
Run this video at 0.25 speed and count the footsteps and look at the amount of ground covered in those footsteps. Then try to imagine yourself there and how many it would take you to cover that much ground at a natural walk like this thing was doing. Whatever this is its huge. Call this what you want but this is absolutely not human. If you've ever walked on a creekbed or rocks you always look down.
100% real. With the technology we have now and the amount of analysis this video has been subjected to, if it were fake, we'd know it by now.
agreed..
Then where are they? You can't prove a negative. But then again, you don't have to when it's a ridiculous proposition.
@@marcrosner845 Black Swan fallacy. You don't need to fill in all the dots before you can take as truth the evidence before you. Cart, horse.
100% fake, you mean. It's definitely a costume. There's no way a 8ft tall ape man would escape being detected by modern technology. We would have founds remains of Bigfoot by now. They would be a hell of a lot more common. People would have found and killed or captured one by now. Actual low IQ to think this is real.
technology today ? you mean like zooming in on the video ? there's not much we can do with a video with no other evidence whatsoever
Where's the stabilization of the beginning and the end? This is the calmest part anyway.
I don’t have the full video. I found this clip on Reddit and posted it. The original link is in the video description.
Not claiming it to be real or fake, but based on that walk stride it looks too natural for it to be a costume, especially for a 7 ft giant one
And did you see how the muscles between its shoulder and head stretch when it looked back? Boi thats a good one
its a gorilla costume lol
Sure, because you're an expert on hominid walking strides.
It'd say it's an animatronic.
Wise Goose your name is “wise goose” get the fuck out of this conversation😂
@@robertfrippgaming6924 There was nothing like that in the 60's. And if there was Patterson and Gimlin sure as hell could not afford it. The only thing that comes close I think is the Hall of Presidents attraction at Disney World which debuted in 1971 and that had Walt Disney levels of money and engineering.
Yeah m k davis does some great work. He's got videos where you can see muscle contraction and everything.
Im still blown away by how real this looks. Nothing indicates that its a man in a suit nothing at all you can even tell the sunlight was shining on its hair
Because it is real...
@@user-sn3bs4hj4z yeah,man, bigfoot is real and he tried to eat my ass.
@@machiavelhobbes3522 No. He tried to eat your brain.
Damn man you're right. A guy in a suit covered with hair would NEVER be reflective of the light. There's no way to do that with synthetic materials.
idk maybe the way it walks? it looks like someone walking on a beach, I've seen people walk like this
That's an award winning costume for 1967. Why have we never seen a costume that good these days? With technology only getting better over time surely there must be even better costumes than this by now available to the public? I mean, this costume fits absolutely perfect. So perfect that you can see muscle movement under the skin when it walks. Those low budget B movies need to talk to these guys about costume design because the ones they use in the movie are nowhere near as good as this.
if it was a costume at all...
@The A Game Agreed. Even if there is 1 percent chance that it was a guy in a suit, that's some suit alright. Since it seemingly replicates creature anatomy and that too more than 50 years ago.
@@theguy3129 doesnt occams razor kinda apply, surely it's more likely that a cowboy somehow managed to make a very convincing film that has defied attempts to disprove it than it is that a breeding population of such a huge animal can stay undiscovered in the 20th and now 21st century? I'd love to be proved wrong of course
@The A Game I've heard this argument before, isn't it basically the walk a clown does in those silly massive shoes?
you can only see muscle movement in "enhanced" video
Hey does anybody know where this was actually filmed? Cause I wondered that for years. Thank you in advance.
alongside Bluff Creek, a tributary of the Klamath River, about 25 logging-road miles (40 km) northwest of Orleans, California
You can clearly see the muscles flexing as it walks. That wouldnt show in a suit. Not in this particular video but the one monsterquest did.
Never breed.
Only weird thing is Hollywood couldn't recreate this back then
How would you know that? Kubrick filmed 2001 a Space Odyssey way back then
Roger Patterson was already a filmmaker. Plus, he just happened to write a book called 'Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist.'just before his encounter. The creature on his book just happens to be female.
Actually, Patterson was one who modified the suit. The face mask was replaced, with leather such horsehide. The breasts were stuffed, no doubt by extra fur. To look like a credulous bigfoot costume.
The person in the suit was called Bob Heironimus. Patty was confirmed to be only 6 feet 3 inches.
there is no suit, bot@@Paul_G73
We've ALL got it wrong. Clearly this is a juvenile Wookie. Their fur is black at a young age. Then it lightens up to tan shades with age and sun exposure.
every Bigfoot footage looks like a man in a suit....but this film has always freaked me out because I see an animal.
Thats is actually this what i think about it
In 1967 costumes were no where near this good, like they are in the present day. Look the state of the art in ape costumes and such at the time in some movies and TV from the mid sixties, let alone a couple of cowboys making one in their spare time.
I saw one about 25 years ago. Crossed the road right in front of my truck. It was about 10’ tall, shoulders about 4’ wide , coned head. He was massive. Looked right at me too as I passed by him. Changed my life forever.
Sure that happened...
@@theMelkorable 🤦♂️🤦♂️
And he said "I need about tree fiddy".
Were you just looking in the mirror?
@@WilliHeckerslike blocked
the way he is arched and walks effortlessly through the forest ground makes it seem real. I mean to put a man in a suit and have him walk over branches and holes, debris you would see him stumble or struggle a bit. this things just cruise on by. it seems like it's just barreling through the forest with ease.
It is actually a *she;* there are breasts. Additionally, experts, such as Jeff Meldrum think that it was nursing an injury, as its gait is laboured.
Good point about the lack of stumbling. That is a point I have never considered. If this were a costume, then it would be hot, cumbersome and it would be difficult to see through; and a whole myriad of other things that I am probably leaving out.
Good point!
yeah idk how actors in monkey costumes move and it looks so effortlessly either... you can clearly see it's a costume by how stiff it is, if it were a real animal you'd be able to see it's butt move like in humans when they walk
people beleive what they want
I wonder how many times they practiced this before the camera was turned on
Probably the most shocking videotape I ever seen in my entire life.....my god, he...he is just right there !
@otherk4311 It’s a she; look at the breasts.
Love this. Keep this video up.❤
Keep in mind when watching this, that Star Wars: A New Hope came out ten years after this and yet somehow ten years later and with professional costume designers, chewbacca still didn't look this good.
A year after this film, the original Planet of the Apes came out. Have you seen those costumes? How did an ex rodeo clown manage to design a suit decades and decades ahead of Hollywood?
You can barely see it when its stabilized, by what standards is this costume better than any other?
@@maebe7668 Check out analysis videos that highlight the weight of the thigh hitting the ground, the worn out fur where its arms swing, among many more natural features a costume wouldnt be able to recreate even by today standarts (no reason to go through all that trouble when you have good cgi anyways).
@@maebe7668 I doubt they found a built dude with such long ass arms lol
@Ryan Vetter Chewbacca looks fake. Sorry, man.
@@Toxic2T they did for Star Wars lmao
I remember seeing this at the Saturday matinee movie back in the early 70s along with other ones about monsters all over the world.
55 years ago today!!!
Is there any way to interpolate the frame rate the way some TVs do, so it bumps up to 60P with smoother motion? Surely there must be professional software that has such capability.
I have no idea, Robert. You would need to ask that question to someone who is more tech savvy.
Why to see more clearly how fake it is?
sure, it can be done.
@@Peanutbreese2001 mindless rhetoric, why don't you detail the clear fakery?
Robert Staton mk Davis made a 1080p60fps stabilised and enhanced video of the Patterson subject just go onto “greenwave10fb” on UA-cam and scroll down abit and you will find it
Say what you want, but I believe this movie is true.
'Believe'
@@brianlaudrupchannel Grammer nazi
@@LisaAnn777 I wasn't correctly any spelling
So is bigfoot canonically supposed to have a force field, or what?
Walter that shouldn’t have to be explained🤣
@Walter ooff missed the joke.
Side effect of stabilization of the footage,
Every Bigfoot gets one when they reach the right age
Very nice Bigfoot walking
There have been massively skilled attempts to recreate this and all have failed to re-enact the detail. Here's the reality. Either its a fake or its real. If its a fake, its a very good one and the most well done hoax in the history of ever. If its real, wow that's amazing and we need to begin to come to that conclusion and study this seriously. In so far there has not been any high effort to prove big foot. There should be.
You're joking, right? There have been thousands of attempts to find Bigfoot, from very simple hunting expeditions to expensive hi-tech operations. All have failed. Finding Bigfoot should be the easiest thing in the world, A seven-foot, 500lb mammal would have to eat an enormous amount of food. Just go to a place where there have been sightings, put out meat, fruit and vegetables and it will come to eat. Every creature, including us, establishes feeding patterns to get food as easily as possible. For Bigfoot, which apparently has no weapons, traps or other means of catching game and does not cultivate food plants, free food for the taking would be irresistible. I wish people would think logically about this. It must eat, it must sleep, it must breed, it must get old and weak and die. At all these times it would be easy to find. We haven't found it because it's not there.
What I meant was serious scientific research teams. Like National Geographic and smithsonian institute style. So far all that has been done is half baked attempts that have proved nothing.
@@chadatl7217 It's very difficult to find a physical manifestation of something that exists only in the minds of gullible simpletons.
@@landl47 Please don't muddle and confuse the issue with sound, intelligent, reasoned thought and undeniable facts. That only serves to force Bigfooters into their squatchsplaining mode where the most improbable, comical, and absurd explanations manifest and reveal themselves. Logic and critical thinking are foreign concepts to these rubes.
@@landl47 You're simply trying to confuse the issue by using reasoned, factual, logical common sense. "Squatchers" are not interested in any of that. They prefer to live in a fantasy world where mythical creatures exist and where you don't have to be very intelligent.
Patterson & Zapruder should of collaborated on a film!!!
xoxo The Clarences
should HAVE collaborated.
@@davidcopson5800 Thanks for the correction! xoxo The Clarences
Please can anyone tell me what kind of stabilisation technique this is? How is it called what is the process?
Here is the research paper of how it was done.
www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi/research-papers/Tian-manuscript_revised.pdf
WOW! you can see bigFoot aura!!!
I love how everyone says "but some guy said he wore the suit"
To this day 6 different people claimed to wear a suit for this film. So either alot of people are lying or that suit is bigger than i thought.
True but with Bob there is direct evidence he was the one in the costume. There is an unexplained anomaly on the film where the bigfoot's eye reflects light. This means in the film the bigfoot has a fake eye. It was found out in the 90s Bob has a fake eye which explains the light reflection.
@@katkit4281
1: Bob H. is nowhere tall enough. Never was.
2. He has no evidence whatsoever to back up his claims. He initially failed to point out where the film was even shot.
3. He has changes his story countless times. From when Roger Patterson allegedly approached him, to the suit itself.
@@NerevarOfficialReal I literally explained evidence showing it was him in my comment but good job on that reading comprehension lol. And the Bigfoot in the video is only 6 foot estimated many times in research such as with the BBC.
The best bigfoot footage of all time. Been others that are good but this is all the evidence we should need on wether if its real or not!
I had a good laugh when I read your comment!
@@jamesmorrissey5604 damn you need to get out more if thats the case 😂
... as in you think it's fake, right?
Science proves its not fake. Cant fake muscle movements. Also I doubt they would make a ape suit with breasts if it were fake!
@@uptownpapi2911 What science?
It's real.A real man in a real suit.
not a man
Tons of studies have been done by some of the most decorated special effects personnel in the world and they’ve all came to an agreement that suit technology in 1967 was nowhere near the accuracy and authenticity of this creature. The muscles definition, the bending and flexing of muscles, the breasts and all movements plus the ground coverage is very perplexing. I vote this is an authentic hominid “Sasquatch”
Everything you just said was BS. Yawn.
>Tons of studies have been done by some of the most decorated special effects personnel in the world
You made that up.
When you realize most skeptics pry live in apartments in cities and pry never go out in woods that are over a few miles away from civilization.
You hit the nail on the head buddy.
yeah, also when you realize nobody has ever seen an actual bigfoot because they dont exist
Born and raised in a rural area. Regularly go on hikes, backpacking, camping, etc. If anything, experience with the outdoors makes me more skeptical, because I’m familiar with how animals move and behave. While I think the costume is quite good given how old this footage is, the movement just screams “man in a suit”.
There are also skeptics who are actually hunters and even survivalist who live in the woods for weeks at a time and say there’s nothing out there
@@matternicuss its been proven to not be
When an image has digital effects used it changes the image. Video stabilization is something that I understand the concept. Basically what happens is the image is cropped and a set point stays within the frame at the same point. This puts all of the motion by the camera outside of the frame of reference. Works fine when the subject is somewhere in the middle of the frames, but not so well when the subject is near the edge of the film in this case. The image would go in and out of the stabilized image or only part of the subject would show part of the time. My question here is that there is a digital circle around the Bigfoot that follows the movement. This almost looks like what Star Wars tried to do with the sandspeeders to hide the fact that it was actually on wheels. The smeared vaseline to fuzz out the image. You can see a similar circle surrounding the Tie Fighters as they approach the Millenium Falcon. My question is what is causing the ditial artifact circle around the subject. It is a new technology being applied to an old medium, but not sure what would cause it. Is it because the subject is the most movement in the frame and the computer had trouble stablizing that so the subject was stabilized separately and than transposed over the entire frame where the subject should have been?
Here is a research paper describing the stabilized film:
www.isu.edu/media/libraries/rhi/research-papers/Tian-manuscript_revised.pdf
It's a Bigfoot in a suit.
how come ex-CIA informants claim to have worked with latex and costumes and masks indistinguishable by the human eye around that time, but they couldn't make a costume like that?
the man that made the costumes for planet of the apes said, back then they couldnt make a costume like this... so why should two farmers could do it?
The fact that this was conveniently filmed by a big foot obsessed guy instead of a random person who happened to be there tells me everything I need to know.
A random person wouldn't have had a camera at the ready. People didn't exactly have smartphones back then
@@atronachh Still would have been more believable if it was from someone who was a wildlife cameraman, not a bigfoot hunter.
Open your fucking eyes and THINK FOR YOURSELF. That is a REAL FUCKING CREATURE that is walking across your screen. The skeptics are the ones that are lying to themselves.
Why? If I go out looking for evidence of deer in my area (which there most certainly are) and I find them. Are you not gonna believe me because “oh of course the guy looking for deer finds deer.” Hopefully you wouldn’t because anyone that says that would be a certified dumbass. Obviously if someone is out looking for something they have a better chance of finding that something that someone who isn’t trying. You should think deeper about this stuff, and stop just disregarding it. Am I saying Bigfoot exists. No. I’m just saying you operate under bad science.
Ridiculous logic. You should evaluate the evidence on its own merits.
"You can see the Muscles in the leg." Or, dude forgot to take his wallet out of his pants.
To prove it a fake all you have to do is reproduce a suit that looks this real.
@D j And we’re still waiting for someone to pull that off, 55 years later.
First you have to catch a real bigfoot or at least find a dead body and prove he is real.
Its a hoax
@@AndrewMay-ju8et yea but a human doesn't walk like that keep in mind during the 60s suits weren't that detailed I would say that this is still a mystery I mean think about it only 5% of the ocean has been explored and who knows what actually lives out in the wild
The person in the suit was Bob Heironimus. Find he was there at the time in 1967, and dear friend of Roger Patterson who bought the costume from Philip Morris, he worked in the circus. and suit was 'Girl to Gorilla' costume.
wow look how stable that footage of bob walking is.
Three words: minimum viable population.
Jake Larson except it’s literally been proven and well known that if it is a suit it couldn’t be him. He couldn’t even do the walk on flat ground without a suit on. Also, HES NOWHERE NEAR THE CONFIRMED HIEGHT. We know for a FACT that Patty is over 6 foot 5. How do we know this? Shortly after the film was taken a man went down there and walked the EXACT path, he was 6foot5. When compared Patty is clearly slightly taller. And Patty is hunched over. Making patty’s height a possible 7feet tall.
@@plaguethefallen do you realize that eastern lowland gorillas are an endangered species living on an entire different continent? That they will very likely go extinct without human intervention? So thank you for making my point. Many Sasquatch enthusiasts will say the population of Sasquatch is just a few thousand in North America, and that's why they are so "rare". Yet you want to claim there are as many as fifty thousand Sasquatch...okay, so where are they then? Where are the bodies? Where are the fossils? What do Sasquatch eat if there are so many resources? We have an EXCELLENT fossil record dating back millions of years to document human evolution, and the divergent split of humans from other great apes, and yet no Sasquatch? How come? How come Roger Patterson finds one the first week he goes looking that looks exactly like the sketches in his diary??? Blurry videos are not proof.Minimum viable population is basic high school biology, and it's inexcusable that so called "Bigfoot researchers" who think they are contributing to science don't know about such things.
Jake Larson Jake Larson Jake Larson Jake Larson you do realize that I was just using it as a comparison? You do realize that the only “human intervention” is preventing poacher from wiping them out? It’s not like humans NEED to be there, if it wasn’t for poachers human intervention would not be needed. As for the 50,000, I said that number because there COULD be as many as that and still go easily undetected. The smaller the number, the easier it is for them to be undetected.
Also, you obviously know NOTHING about the wilderness and have never been in it. The only people who ask “where are the bodies” are people who lack understanding of the Wilderness. Also, you do realize WE STILL DISCOVER new fossils of apes? Also, lack of fossil evidence means NOTHING. Look at Gigantopithecus, which is said to have been 10 or more feet tall. They literally have like 1 jaw bone and a bunch of teeth.
Where’s the body? You seriously can’t be that ignorant of the wilderness. Let me paint a picture for you. There’s 20,000+ black bears in the state of PA, the state I’m from. I have NEVER came across a body or even a skeleton. My dad, who’s hunted for 40+years has only seen a dozen or so live ones and never any dead ones. Nature takes care of things VERY quickly. Youre also ignoring the fact that a number of primates eat and/or bury their dead. Literally all of your questions can be answered if you just know how the wilderness is and do research on primates.
What do Sasquatch eat if there’s so many resources? Again, you seriously can’t be this ignorant about the wildness. There’s deer, Berry’s, works, fish. There’s A LOT of that stuff out there, more then enough to sustain a population.
And as for your minimum viable population, a few thousand is definitely a viable population. And you act like there’s have to be thousands in one area. Just look at chimps. A Troop can be anywhere from 15-150 members. So there really doesn’t have to be that many. This is stuff you would know if you knew what you were talking about and did proper research to get a better understanding.
As for Patterson, I’ll leave you with this. If you want to believe a broke guy was able to get his hands on a suit that was ahead of its time and knew someone who was around 7 feet tall with anatomically incorrect proportions to a human (it’s been proven the being in the video is around 7feet tall and it’s been proven the proportions aren’t correct and something that can’t be faked.) then okay. And if you also want to believe that he made/had the suit made with the mindset that in the future people would be able to make the video stabile and clear so the thought “better put on breasts that bounce, on and better put nipples on the breasts, oh and better add a Hernia that somehow moves with the muscles right there, oh and better make it so the suit can imitate a thigh jiggle and flexing muscles.” Then okay. But come on, that sounds even more far fetched and stupid then saying “hey, maybe this is actually something.” After all, if it was a suit, wouldn’t making the video make it more clear, stabile and zoom make it appear more fake instead f adding credibility that it couldn’t be a suit?
Jake Larson Jake Larson you’re acting like there’s no forests or that there’s just a little bit of forests spread about when that’s not the case. And I doubt you’ve ever been in the woods, if you have been in there so much then you wouldn’t ask a question as stupid as “where’s a body.” Also, I literally stated facts.
Extinction, from what? There’s plenty of forests for them to reside in. What does satellites and drones have to do with Sasquatch? You act like those things have been used countless times to look for Bigfoot when they haven’t. Hell a drone has made been used a few times. Hav with ever drove a drone over the woods? Obviously not, BECAUSE YOU CANT SEE ANYTHING 🤦🏼♂️ you just keep
Proving you don’t know what you’re talking about. Also, I love how you ignore everything I say because you have no argument. Hell you proved you have no idea what your talking about with your initial comment stating it’s Bob even though it’s been proven that if it is someone in a suit that it COULD NOT have been Bob.
how do we know this isnt some guy in a suit
@abook2141 One reason is that Planet of the Apes was released a year after this footage was recorded and not even Hollywood’s top costume designers could make a suit that was remotely as realistic as this. There are several other details that suggest that this is a real creature, and not a suit, such as the appearance of breasts and an inverted forehead.
The first young steppa in CA. Kept that shit ten towns down and stood on business. Rest easy big homie
Thanks for stabilizing the film. It is now clearer than ever it is a guy in a suit!
The opposite. It is now even CLEARER that this is a real Sasquatch.
ummmm wouldnt a sasquatch look like a man in a suit though...?
@@asas-mb4wj Does a gorilla look like a man in a suit?
its not a suit normie, go get your iq checked @@Robz82001
Patterson tried to copyright the name "Bigfoot"before this film. Then out of nowhere he runs into one? Come on. It's fake. But it's a helluva damn good one.
Where did they get the costume? How did someone make a costume so lifelike that you could see muscles moving in perfect fluid motion in 1967?
@@valjean3663 ua-cam.com/video/AQLmsYRnP5o/v-deo.html
@@joelaw5207 I'll admit I'm more than a little more skeptical after viewing that, but I don't think it's the slam dunk against the Patterson footage you think it is. The one argument against Bob H.'s claims that I've yet to see anyone rebut is that the alleged sasquatch in the Patterson film is about a foot taller than Bob. And when they show him walking in the suit in that Discovery Channel clip at the end, it looks nothing like the thing in the 1967 clip. The most interesting takeaway I got from that is that the old style football shoulder pads could be used to simulate muscle movement. That's clever, but it doesn't account for the leg muscles that people claim they see in the footage.
Discovery@@valjean3663 You say a foot taller than Bob, but from the distance filmed there's no way of accurately measuring scale/ size. Its bob in the suit. As for the Discovery clip at the end, that was just a simple mock-up.
@@joelaw5207 I call bullshit on that whole video.
The one, true imagine of a female Sasquatch in my opinion. Extremely rare image!!!
Digital Visual Effects specialist Dave Mc Donald processed the latest 3D Lidar scanning technology by Pete Kelsey (2022) on the actual area where the big foot was recorded and using existing markers from the original film and cross referencing with the scan gave a very high degree of accuracy height of the female bigfoot of 1.9m tall or 6' 3" tall. Not as tall as we would all have originally thought however this is a female bigfoot in the film which "might" put a male bigfoot at 2.28m or 7' 6" tall.
The part where he turns his head: Mrs. Bigfoot "And don't forget MILK!!"
It’s funny that you should mention that because if one looks closely, they can see that the subject is not a male, but a female. It has breasts. See the video I linked in the pinned comment at the top of the comment section. It will provide you with higher quality, zoomed in shots that clearly depict breasts.
The thing that you cannot fake is, back in 1967 Patterson and Gimlin were two broke cowboys. They were the least technology type guys around. So if this was fake that many seem to think it is, How would they have the wherewithal to create a suit that was so real that that most of its details were not known until technological advances came along 50 years later with digital photography? If it was a fake suit, they wouldn’t care about added the mammary glands, the muscle definition, the mange or patches of missing hair, the crest on top of the head, etc. if they were out to fake everything, they wouldn’t care about these close up details that no one would see in their lifetime. They would have created a monkey suit with a zipper in the back. A fake just doesn’t add up.
These days many furries hand-make their own costumes with extreme detail, precision, research, energy, talent and time. Back then, anyone who would've been a furry would've been completely isolated and would've made their own costume in total secret. And they would've wanted good details, just like nowaday-furries want.
In 1967 Patterson was trying to make a film about Bigfoot being chased by cowboys. Guess what this is? As for the suit, no-one has suggested until you just did that Patterson and Gimlin made the suit. There are numerous Hollywood costumiers and renting a suit from one of them wouldn't have been that expensive- especially if it was a battered old thing like the one you just described.
@@landl47 in 1967, P&G had an interest in the sasquatch legends that the native americans spoke of through their history. they had plans to find one & film it knowing there was an opportunity to make money if they could find evidence for its existence, so....they travelled to an isolated area where sightings, footprints & activity had been spoken of by local & indigenous people. they travelled on horseback, knew the terrain, were lifelong mountain men & real cowboys & they took this footage. If bigfoot existed, who would be more likely to chance upon one than these two men?
@@dyschromotopia They went to the place where Bigfoot footprints (in fact, the footprints which led to the name 'Bigfoot') were found. These footprints were, many years later, revealed to be fake. So there just happened to be a real Bigfoot in the same place as the fake footprints? Patterson was strapped for cash- he had to rent the camera. Lucky he didn't have to wait for weeks or months to get a good shot as most wildlife photographers do, wasn't it? Then he filmed a female with a sagittal crest. Do you know in how many primate species the females have sagittal crests? None. And here we are 53 years later, with ATVs, drones, HD cameras and thousands of people out looking and we still haven't got a better film of a Bigfoot than this. I'm sorry, but the backstory just doesn't add up.
@Noartist They went to a place that had FAKE Bigfoot activity and claim to have found a real Bigfoot. It's like going to the place where Jurassic Park was filmed and claiming to have found a real dinosaur.
That’s a really big creature to be a man and that Bob guy, this thing is a monster.
If you ever seen the farnese hercules statue and you see this footage you can tell they have same body type.
If it’s real, it’s been 50 years!!! Where tf is more footage of a Sasquatch
There's tons of footage of supposed Sasquatch online. The problem is determining what's real and what's a hoax. Sadly most videos are hoaxes trying to recreate the fame gathered by this footage.
On every pics featuring you're moma
Big foot, she always walking with a purpose.
Nice fur coating. I wonder what kind of hair product it uses 🤩🤩🤩
They didn’t make that well made suits back in 1967. Maybe for Godzilla, a high budget film. But this is a no budget film, a family movie. How would they get their hands on a 1,000 dollar suit!?
Maybe it looked like shit up close.
“So fast on such an uneven surface”
First of all the ground looks pretty flat to me but even if it wasn’t, the fur of the costume or wearing boots inside the costume would have made it easy to do.
The walk, the speed, the swinging of the arms, the head turning quickly… everything is very human
Only one problem, it doesnt look human at all
@@Bryanseas is this irony? It definitely looks human 😂
@@alices5633 "is this irony?" You mean "sarcasm" not "irony"....tard.
That's my dad. He's such an idiot. Always pulling pranks.
This ain't no prank.
MojoPin1983 expect it is. big foot in san Andreas is more true
Bigfoot is no laughing matter.
MojoPin1983 it's just a prank bro
@@Noname-ut1ye he was clearly making a joke...
A well known researcher says the "bump" on the head is a pony-tail.
Does anyone know if there’s other footage or video where they find the other supposed Sasquatch in the foreground? I’ve heard other rumors there was supposedly juveniles hiding since this was clearly a female caught in camera. Would love to see that footage where they are at least circled in the foreground to see if I can see them.
*Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot Film - Complete Version:* ua-cam.com/video/OBTUQI60yqQ/v-deo.html&feature=emb_title
Noopsie Chapin I don't but for footage of a sasquatch and it's child please search on here for the 'independence day bigfoot footage'
To anyone who thinks this is fake, I challenge you to walk with your shins near parallel to the ground, be careful not to hurt yourself though.
Or you could just watch a Marx Brothers film and Groucho will do it for you. It's called a 'compliant gait', it's surprisingly easy to replicate and it allows you to walk fast and with a much longer stride than normal. The reason it's not our usual way of walking is that it is incredibly tiring. Even a modified version like Patty's, much less extreme than Groucho's, would be difficult to keep up for more than a minute or so, which is why the film is only a minute long.
@@landl47 girl, this supposed suit has never been found ever. I'm pretty sure the person who made this suit would have come out bragging a long time ago
@@MisssVP the fact you think it’s real 🤣
@@v1ncent702 the fact you think that making a suit looking that good in 1967 prove that you have the IQ of a slug.
@@MisssVP
Probably because its just a generic suit and there's nothing impressive about it, unlike what a lot of morons in these comments are saying.
That's a big guy......
for you
That's an average sized female Sasquatch!
@@davidcopson5800 nope. It's a man in a suit at 6 feet 3 inches.
Hello🙂 I've always been fascinated by this film. Do you know if this site was damaged during the recent wildfires?
I'm in Canada, and was just curious. Thanks for the video : ) 🇨🇦
I have no idea if Bluff Creek was affected.
I, too, am from Canada; Toronto, to be exact.
God bless.
@@MojoPin1983 Winnipeg here. Thanks for responding 🙂 🍁
This is the most convincing evidence
The thing that has always stuck with me as far as details are concerned is that this creature has breasts. I just don’t see a guy thinking of that element as a creature feature.
Moobs
Why not it’s a 50/50 shot,it had to be either male or female,what makes you think nobody would think of it?
Apes have breasts.