Scientists Discovered The First Place On Earth Humans Ever Existed
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- Scientists Discovered The First Place On Earth Humans Ever Lived
Subscribe To Life's Biggest Questions: bit.ly/2evqECe
Journey back to the dawn of civilization and witness the awe-inspiring discovery of Göbekli Tepe, the world's oldest known temple complex. Nestled in the heart of Turkey, this ancient site predates Stonehenge and the Egyptian pyramids by thousands of years, rewriting our understanding of human history. Unearthed in the remote hills of southeastern Turkey, Göbekli Tepe's massive stone pillars, adorned with intricate carvings, stand as a testament to the ingenuity of prehistoric hunter-gatherers. This groundbreaking archaeological discovery challenges conventional narratives, revealing a complex society capable of monumental construction long before the advent of agriculture and settled life. Embark on an unforgettable journey through time as we explore the mysteries of Göbekli Tepe. Who were its builders? What rituals and beliefs did they hold? How did this ancient sanctuary shape the course of human history? Join us as we delve into the secrets of this remarkable site and unlock the hidden chapters of our collective past.
#göbeklitepe #ancienthistory #archaeology #history #lostcivilization #turkey #prehistoric #megalith #lbq #lifesbiggestquestions
For business inquiries, please contact lifesbiggestquestion@gmail.com
All over the world. Man and beast have walked. . Even older than that.
Why do they always talk about Gobekli Tepe as though it is a stand alone settlement? There's no doubt that it is a remarkable and important site but it's not the only one nor is it the oldest. There are at least eleven other relatively close settlements just as old or older than Gobekli Tepe. One of the other sites is 4000 years older and another is about 2000 years older. I should note that Gobekli's location is roughly(very roughly) in the center of the other settlements in the region. So the idea that it was a central meeting center isn't too far fetched. Btw somewhat recent excavations has found domestic occupation in a number of structures at the site. Now whether that occupation was permanent or occasional has yet to be determined.
funny thing though; @ 3:30 he says these discoveries are making them "reconsider the timeline of human development". Maybe if they do, they'll discover "biological machines" don't create themselves.....lol
Not to mention the 11000 year old mounds on LSU campus
Göbeklitepe was a hospital which was closed down by the king Nemrut because he wasn't happy about it. He wanted to show people he was the only God but that hospital healers believed one God and prayed one God. So he was also scared to demolish it In case some curse will come out of it. So he didn't let his soldiers touch even a single stone instead made them burried carefully. That's why we can be found untouched.
@@cokdillihayat-multilinguallife I must of been on vacation enjoying my stay at Atlantis when these News Flashes about the good King Nemrut came out. Thanks for updating us.
@@danhnguyen-fn9eb you didn't even ask the correct questions? Like why did all the scientists ask the same questions but couldn't give any reply to that question! Why did they bury everything with lots of patience ? And why do people only think these places should be gathering places or temples? Why did those people just make these huge places with so much effort to build? Or maybe just for use in their spare time!!! And later they buried carefully? Why? How rich must they be, they didn't need to eat, they didn't need to rest, may be they were angels? Those scientists are brain washed small thinking individuals who work only for capitalist system. Because they are only here to make up stupid stories nothing more
Two questions: where did they get the drinking water, and where was their latrine?
@7:18 the guy who is bewildered by “where is their trash?” Gets his own trash removed and hauled far away at least once a week.
But we know where it goes and it’s only around 30/40 miles
20 years ago they uncovered 5%. Today they have only uncovered 5% and plan on going no further. 😢 Humanity kinda sucks how we are manipulated and lied to about all the important stuff. Reason ti grieve.
Ah. Lied to? About what? What for?
@@ChrisShortyAllenthe entire story of human progression... the timeline of human developement...
The organisation funding the excavation for Turkey, according to research completed by J Corsetti, is the WEF. You can go down many rabbit holes but look what's happening in the world today, recent history being rewritten, it will only take 2 generations of educational indoctrination for people to have a completely different idea of history. There was a reason why the library of Alexandria was destroyed, millenia of historical documents and science wiped out and a new history implemented.
@@ChrisShortyAllento show us that west so called civilization is the best. Linear development in history forced us to be believed by western colonialists
Why is there always the god awful background music. Annoying as hS can't watch.
Why is it always ropes and ramps? What about hydraulics? Just because the area is dry now doesn't mean it was dry then.
Göbeklitepe was a hospital which was closed down by the king Nemrut because he wasn't happy about it. He wanted to show people he was the only God but that hospital healers believed one God and prayed to that God. So he was also scared to demolish it In case some curse will come out of it. So he didn't let his soldiers touch even a single stone instead made them burried carefully. That's why we would be able to found everything untouched.
all dating is off by a very large margin. It is also not the first place humans existed and it was not a temple. Archaeologists have no clue about these ancient sites.
covered by a world wide flood most likely
Lol
NOT hunter gathers, extraterrestrial
Graham Hancock shows us that one can have all the data... and draw perfectly incorrect conclusions from them.
This isnt the first place humans existed that would likely be in africa , where there's those rocks stone hedgy thing and the circles , which just so happen to be near gold deposits , dating back was it 70 or 700,000 years I forgets
nobody lied.......they just didn't know.
Hmmm. The scientist in this video is making some interesting claims. But before this discovery he would have insisted - as a scientist - that these structures could not have been built by hunter gatherers. He should avoid being as certain as he is in the video.
🙂❤👍Thank You 🙂❤👍
It is a MARKET!!!
that makes sense
It states that the animal imagery is exceedingly well made indicating an understanding of nature etc. Yet the figures of people are "human-like", so they either were not that good at carving images or the "human-like" people were not actually human (or at the very least a subspecies of human). We need to remember that when a shard of pottery is found, archaeologists can not only tell you what vessel it came from, but where on the vessel it would have been (and likely the colour and manufacturer). A huge amount of 'guesswork' with any archaeological sites given we are not in the same mindset as the builders, live in a different time and have different religious and 'scientific' beliefs
Imagine the sea fairing that probably really went on.
Okay, maybe. Tell me though, why do some people absolutely freak out about unspecified "they"??? "Who are "they" they ask. I don't know, "them"? How is it possible for them to have never heard of such a thing as "they"? They react very hostile, in groups.
Scientists and the photo of Graham Hancock, ok 😅
Gram is talking about "them" the scientists.... ps archeology is not science.. just observation
@@NINJAGOINS Really? What is archeology for you?
@@NINJAGOINS So you are tell me that cambridge university for eg are lying and you are the guy that know what is and not science?
"What is archaeological science?
Simply put, archaeological science is the development and application of scientific techniques to the analysis of archaeological materials. The classic example is the use of radiocarbon decay to provide a robust chronology enabling us to examine the timing of different cultures across the globe. Many other scientific methods, from imaging to physical, chemical and biological analysis have been enthusiastically embraced by archaeology, as they often provide the best means to understand the date, geographic origins, manufacture and use of the artefacts we study, as well as the ancestry, diet and life-histories of past humans, animals and plants. The dramatic success of these approaches has meant that the interface between archaeology and other sciences is increasingly fluid, and at Cambridge we strive to lead this integration of cutting-edge archaeology with novel scientific methods. Archaeological science is therefore at the forefront of interdisciplinary research highlighting ethical challenges and practicalities of shared knowledge creation. Archaeological science now reaches into almost every area of the discipline and explores big themes: how we have shaped the world and our resilience to catastrophe, the deep history of technological inventions, domestication, and migrations which define our modern world. As analytical precision and speed of measurement increase and datasets expand (fuelled by the open science movement) an increasingly important element of archaeological science is the interrogation and analysis of data using advanced computation.
What do archaeological scientists do?
Archaeological scientists face both the challenges and the opportunities of working at the interface of humanities and hard sciences. They have to understand the theories and questions that guide archaeological research as well as the foundations and uses of the scientific techniques they employ. Some archaeological scientists spend most of their time in the lab, for example conducting genetic analyses or optimising calibrations for chemical analyses of archaeological materials; others spend much time in the field, for example collecting soil samples for micromorphological analyses or advising on conservation and restoration of freshly excavated materials; archaeological scientists are also often found in museums and archives doing scientific analyses with portable spectrometers and other equipment. Some specialists develop new methods and exploratory projects whereas others prefer the use of more established techniques that may demand less scientific background, or specialise in the computer-based modelling and analysis of data generated by others. Many archaeological scientists involve experimentation too, from small-scale laboratory tests to full-blown reconstructions of ancient technologies.
Archaeological scientists at Cambridge come from all kinds of backgrounds: from biology and physics through to archaeology and classics. They all share an interest in finding synergies and solving puzzles, fully aware that some of the parts may have been lost along the way, and that collaborative teams are essential to use our knowledge to its full potential. This is also reflected in our student cohorts, including students with a wide range of interests and skill-sets that often learn from each other as much as from their teachers. We teach archaeological science at undergraduate level but also through our specialist MPhil in Archaeological Science and PhD programmes.
What are the applications of archaeological science?
Archaeological science at Cambridge works in concert with other branches of the discipline, both within Cambridge and through an extended network on national and international collaborations. We advocate the integrated use of relevant scientific methods often combining organic and inorganic materials in order to enrich archaeological interpretation from single objects, to site contexts, societies and their global connections. For instance:
spatial analysis from fieldwalking surveys to satellite images is used to examine organisation and patterning of human activities, and their interaction with past landscapes
analysis of soils and sediments provide insight into site formation and spatial variation over a range of scales
remains of plants and animals provide evidence of past environments and contain isotopic, genomic and proteomic records of diet, health and disease
we investigate the raw materials and production methods of ancient technologies to understand their organisation and change
at museums and archives we find a rich treasure trove of artefacts, but they must be understood in the context of the methods of past conservation and the current state of decay
large datasets of scientific data are increasingly available, and through an understanding of their mode of production we can integrate them to explore broader questions over greater length scales
Archaeological science trains you to apply scientific methods and tools to remarkable materials from our past. You will be taught the need to understand fundamental mechanisms, interpret generated data and be aware of how these can be distorted or overprinted by subsequent processes and (in some cases) conservation treatment. You will enhance your skills in reading and critical thinking. Depending upon your area of interest you will learn analytical skills and methods of interpretation, data processing, and statistical inference. You will appreciate the potential and limitations of different scientific methods to help understand the past. As analyses are often destructive you will need to confront ethical dilemmas within the discipline. You will learn how to work within a large team and to communicate your knowledge to non-scientists. Archaeological scientists, therefore, have a unique mix of transferable skills spanning the humanities and sciences.
@@NINJAGOINS Ummmm....Archeology is science. Scientific analysis, fieldwork, testing of theories, etc, etc, etc... "Just observation" LOL!!!
@@Ispeakthetruthify lmk what theories archeology has tested....which ones are sound( i am referencing megalithic ancient structures like Graham)
c. 3100 B.C.E., Sumerians Invent Writing
-с. 3100-с. 1550 B.C.E., Building of Stonehenge.
Stonehenge is seriosly one room at gobekletepe
Nimplims built it all
of course they had to "hunt and gather" they couldnt go to the grocery store or Walmart jeez !
I love how there obviously very compitent nad intelligent old civilizations with sculpt, draw or write about aliens, giants or reptile people, and for some reason we think 'no they we wrong or crazy'. lol there really is no point recording history and experience for future generations, if they will just think you were a dumb crack smoker.
1:56
с. 2575-с. 2566 B.C.E., Building of the Great Pyramid
Their trash was washed away by the flood!
Hehe
Yes . But everyone misjudges the "flood" it was an impact from an ice asteroid. Massive destruction. Zoom out on google earth.. the scar goes from china to the east coast of africa.
It was a lost civilization
🦂🩸 Alacran de Durango Mexico 🦂🩸
🙏🏼☝🏽🔑❤️🔥🥷🏻🪽🧬🇲🇽🐉
Nothing to do with hunter/gatherers, created by E.T.s, just like the other ancient structures around the world.
Lol good one
When do you believe they stopped building and why?
Are they like Daleks?
looks to me like an animal ZOO. well, they still exist as of today
noah's zoo where did keep all those anmail after the flood you have feed them
😂 🧢
Whatever Geologists Archeologists or Historian, all of them are arrogantly Ignorant. they must say (This is the history of the earth as far as they find out) they must admit that their knowledge is limited. the history of Human on earth is Much Older than what they knew
.
Why not share your extensive knowledge? As if. 😂
@@ChrisShortyAllen My Dear. it's not about My or Your Knowledge, it's about True Honest Science. they must show humility, every now and then Archeologists discover Unknown civilization on the continents we live on. what about the sunken continents they are discovering now. i think you got what i mean.
The joke is they used to believe religious fiction instead.