100 Science Facts that Will Shock You

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @Sideprojects
    @Sideprojects  4 місяці тому +136

    Go to sheathunderwear.com and use the code “SIDEPROJECTS” to get 20% off your order! Thank you Sheath for the sponsorship!

    • @habiks
      @habiks 4 місяці тому

      internet prostitutes.. will try to sell anything.

    • @MindBodySoulOk
      @MindBodySoulOk 4 місяці тому +26

      Fascinating eggskull

    • @TheDopekitty
      @TheDopekitty 4 місяці тому +8

      I hope there's just the one ad read, or is this not a compilation?

    • @yourbuddyunit
      @yourbuddyunit 4 місяці тому +5

      Ideas for episodes:
      100 foods humans changed before the industrial revolution?
      100 banned books?
      100 types of engines?
      100 times a cyber attack shook the world?
      50 microorganisms we defeated & 50 microorganisms that kicked our ass thru the generations?

    • @ZoltanF1LH
      @ZoltanF1LH 3 місяці тому +1

      Awesome video although you did pronounce Uranus wrong 😅
      30:12

  • @CaesarSaladin7
    @CaesarSaladin7 2 місяці тому +13

    This is now my “I woke up in the middle of the night and need to go back to sleep” video. Just engaging enough, just calming enough.

  • @aaronolivas6970
    @aaronolivas6970 4 місяці тому +1026

    Bro said if they watch me for an hour they'll watch me for 2 😂😂

    • @tashachantal5711
      @tashachantal5711 4 місяці тому +134

      And we will 💁🏻‍♀️

    • @XiaolinDraconis
      @XiaolinDraconis 4 місяці тому +87

      He's my current sleep watch. So I queue up like 10hrs every night.

    • @jtplays7411
      @jtplays7411 4 місяці тому +128

      There is nothing wrong with 2 hours of education. It's definitely better than 2 hours of doom scrolling TikTok.

    • @spddiesel
      @spddiesel 4 місяці тому +22

      Just finished taping off trim to paint a room, perfect timing (and runtime) for this to come up lol

    • @Lngbrdninjamasta
      @Lngbrdninjamasta 4 місяці тому +3

      Yup

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 4 місяці тому +178

    0:40 - N°1 - Early galaxies were banana shaped
    2:00 - Mid roll ads
    3:30 - N°2 - Saturn has a hexagonal storm larger than earth
    5:00 - N°3 - Earth has the best view of hoag's object
    6:10 - N°4 - Moons can have their own moons
    7:15 - N°5 - The milky way might be bigger than andromeda
    9:15 - N°6 - There is an asteroid worth quintillions of dollars
    10:25 - N°7 - Europa has more water than the fire earth
    11:25 - N°8 - Neutron stars can spin so fast they tear themselves apart
    14:10 - N°9 - Saturn now has the most moons in the solar system
    15:35 - N°10 - There are 96 bags of poop on the moon
    16:35 - N°11 - The sun rotates faster at its equator
    17:50 - N°12 - Suns are like onions, they have layers
    20:35 - N°13 - Anything can become a black hole if you squeeze it hard enough
    22:15 - N°14 - Quasars are the brightest objects in the universe
    24:30 - N°15 - The milky way might have been a quasar
    26:00 - N°16 - The collision with andromeda isn't going to be as bad as you think
    27:15 - N°17 - The future of the sun is going to be just as bad as you think
    28:40 - N°18 - The solar system has some wild terrain
    30:50 - N°19 - Supervoids are absolutely terrifying
    32:15 - N°20 - Jupiter crossed the asteroid belt twice
    33:00 - N°21 - Uranus & Neptune switched places long ago
    33:45 - N°22 - Astronomers use supernovas to measure distance
    34:40 - N°23 - Ancient astronomers were much smarter than you realize
    35:20 - N°24 - The soviets photographed the surface of Venus
    36:15 - N°25 - Black holes have a theoretical opposite
    37:35 - N°26 - White holes might not be real, but grey holes probably are
    38:40 - N°27 - Some planets don't have a home star
    39:10 - N°28 - Some of these planet travel with a buddy
    39:35 - N°29 - Planets can orbit more than one star
    40:10 - N°30 - Stars can go rogue too
    40:55 - N°31 - The hunt for exomoons is underway
    42:00 - N°32 - Kilonovas aren't quite as bright as supernovas
    42:40 - N°33 - Micronovas are even smaller
    43:15 - N°34 - Asteroids are no match for our technology
    44:30 - N°35 - But our technology is no match for solar storms
    46:20 - N°36 - There is no such thing as a green star
    47:45 - N°37 - The milky way blocks our view of the great attractor
    48:30 - N°38 - Galaxies also have a habitable zone
    49:50 - N°39 - Some of the 1st stars had black holes in their cores
    50:45 - N°40 - Some stars today may have neutrons stars at their cores
    51:35 - N°41 - The moon crust is thicker on its dark side
    52:40 - N°42 - There is more gold in the sun than water in the earth's oceans
    53:25 - N°43 - Chinese astronomers were the 1st to notice sunspots
    53:55 - N°44 - Jupiter's storm is at least 100 of years old
    54:35 - N°45 - Venus may be the best place to look for life
    55:45 - N°46 - Dyson spheres aren't really feasible , but a dyson swarm is
    56:50 - N°47 - Time machines also need to be space machines
    57:45 - N°48 - We might never find alien life , not because of space, but because of time
    58:35 - N°49 - There are approximately 2 trillions galaxies in the observable universe
    59:15 - N°50 - Kelt 9B is a planet hotter than some stars
    1:00:20 - N°51 - Oumuamua might have been a new type of astronomical object
    1:01:20 - N°52 - We live in just the right time to view a total solar eclispe
    1:01:55 - N°53 - Pluto can be considered a binary planet
    1:03:10 - N°54 - The man who discovered Pluto flew right past it
    1:03:50 - N°55 - The solar system is much larger than you think
    1:04:30 - N°56 - There is a category of black hole larger than supermassive
    1:05:50 - N°57 - Given enough time, black holes will evaporate
    1:07:00 - N°58 - Above & below the milky are strange bubbles
    1:07:30 - N°59 - Jupiter is not a failed star
    1:08:15 - N°60 - Mars shows evidence of a gigantic tsunami
    1:08:50 - N°61 - Enceladus is the most reflective body in the solar system
    1:09:45 - N°62 - Io is the most volcanic body in the solar system
    1:10:25 - N°63 - Haumea is the fastest spinning object in the solar system
    1:11:10 - N°64 - The universe is missing nearly all of its antimatter
    1:11:55 - N°65 - One rotation of the milky way takes more than 200 millions years
    1:12:30 - N°66 - Most stars exist thanks to quantum tunneling
    1:15:00 - N°67 - It takes only a day for a star's core to turn to iron
    1:16:10 - N°68 - In trillions of years, stars will be frozen
    1:17:20 - N°69 - Long after this, they will become pure iron
    1:18:15 - N°70 - Scientist used to think the universe had no beginning
    1:19:15 - N°71 - We have direct photos of exoplanets
    1:20:00 - N°72 - Gravity lets you see behind things
    1:21:30 - N°73 - Gravitational lensing could allow us to make a really, really, big telescope
    1:22:40 - N°74 - Phobos is going to crash into mars
    1:23:15 - N°75 - Gravitational waves let us watch black holes collide
    1:24:45 - N°76 - Earth is not the best place to live
    1:25:55 - N°77 - It snows metal on venus
    1:26:35 - N°78 - Jupiter is bigger than every other planet combined
    1:27:20 - N°79 - You can fit all the planets between the earth & the moon sometimes
    1:28:25 - N°80 - Orcs are a new mystery in astronomy
    1:29:25 - N°81 - The magnetic field on uranus opens up once a day
    1:30:05 - N°82 - Eris is the reason pluto is no longer a planet
    1:30:50 - N°83 - Pluto is sometimes closer to the sun than neptune
    1:31:15 - N°84 - Space junk is getting dangerous
    1:32:40 - N°85 - The soviets almost got to the moon 1st
    1:33:50 - N°86 - Zambia also tried to get to the moon 1st
    1:35:20 - N°87 - The 1st man made object in space wasn't a rocket satellite
    1:36:25 - N°88 - The asteroid belt is not as dense as you think
    1:37:05 - N°89 - UY scuti puts our sun to shame
    1:38:00 - N°90 - Space takes its toll on the human body
    1:39:05 - N°91 - Pizza has been delivered to space
    1:40:25 - N°92 - It rains methane once every 1000 years on titan
    1:41:50 - N°93 - Only iapetus can see saturn's rings
    1:42:25 - N°94 - The milky way has a supernova once every 50 years
    1:43:50 - N°95 - The US space command confirme the 1st interstellar visitor to earth
    1:44:55 - N°96 - The axis of evil eludes explanation
    1:46:30 - N°97 - The US considered using nuclear bombs for space propulsion
    1:48:20 - N°98 - Neutron stars can be used as cosmic clocks
    1:49:20 - N°99 - More energy hits the earth than we could ever use
    1:50:30 - N°100 - The voyager crafts carry our 1st greeting to aliens

    • @DenethordeSade.90
      @DenethordeSade.90 4 місяці тому +8

      As per usual sir, you do amazing work

    • @RollingLoud.podcast
      @RollingLoud.podcast 4 місяці тому +7

      What about the stuff about the Mayans? I literally only clicked for that.😭

    • @Spadesshovel
      @Spadesshovel 4 місяці тому +2

      1 like for commitment

    • @BruceBoyde
      @BruceBoyde 4 місяці тому

      ​​@@RollingLoud.podcastThat's the one about ancient astronomers at 34:40 I guess. Doesn't really talk about them specifically though.

    • @user-hz6cx3zh1y
      @user-hz6cx3zh1y 4 місяці тому

      Thank you

  • @JohnSmith-yu8ml
    @JohnSmith-yu8ml 4 місяці тому +218

    thumbnail: mayan pyramid with "they were way more advanced than you thought" content: space trivia

    • @Saturn_2138
      @Saturn_2138 4 місяці тому +22

      Yeah, I thought it was general facts. Still watching it though

    • @MrAusdrifter
      @MrAusdrifter 4 місяці тому +22

      They call that click bait. "2 hours of space facts" would have got a lot less clicks

    • @anthonyfrench3169
      @anthonyfrench3169 4 місяці тому +16

      I agree, both the thumbnail and content are a bit misleading to a certain degree...it really implies a broad science scope, which it is not. Second, this would've been more at home on the Astrographics channel...good content definitely, but missed the execution in terms of where this growth content should be at.

    • @petersengupta
      @petersengupta 4 місяці тому +15

      it refers to the fact that ancient civilizations knew way more about the planets than we thought.

    • @cococreates26
      @cococreates26 4 місяці тому +3

      No23 @ 34:40 xx

  • @jonofthehill
    @jonofthehill 4 місяці тому +261

    Me: "Pretty sure I've learned everything I need to know about astrophysics from you, Simon."
    Simon: "Hold my beer."

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 4 місяці тому +9

      Thunderbolts Project

    • @LettyMatamoros
      @LettyMatamoros 4 місяці тому +7

      Do you watch Anton Petrov? great channel if you love space science

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 4 місяці тому +4

      @@LettyMatamoros
      Try watching this b4 you watch the hate channels about it.
      Symbols of an Alien Sky
      Its not about aliens either.

    • @bannedwagon1586
      @bannedwagon1586 4 місяці тому +3

      @@j.pershing2197 Electric Universe theory does make for some great fantasy.

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 4 місяці тому

      @@bannedwagon1586
      Fantasy huh.
      You refuse to have a look yourself. Sheeple.
      They have 2 nobel prize winners
      Dozens of world renowned scientists and researchers and engineers
      They have the mathematics
      They have scalable, repeatable and predictable results.
      Theyre peer reviewed
      They work. Its no fantasy

  • @goodboid
    @goodboid 4 місяці тому +122

    Moons orbiting moons should be called... "Moonions". Obviously.

  • @thomasmount3530
    @thomasmount3530 2 місяці тому +21

    When they were recording Voyager's golden disc they went to the Navaho to record a greeting from them. Later, when they were compiling the disc, a member of NASA staff who could speak Navaho started laughing. The Navaho had recorded the message, 'Watch out for these guys, they come for your land.'

  • @DenethordeSade.90
    @DenethordeSade.90 4 місяці тому +13

    Two hours of simon talking about space? HELL YEAH 👍

  • @SiCKenz
    @SiCKenz 4 місяці тому +49

    Simon: The oldest galaxies were pickle shaped
    Also Simon: MY PICKLE IS IN A SHEATHE RIGHT NOW

  • @stauros360
    @stauros360 4 місяці тому +41

    Through years of devouring UA-cam as white noise I'm proud to say there are only a few things I haven't heard of in this 2h long video from Simon

    • @racinmoeherdez4434
      @racinmoeherdez4434 3 місяці тому +1

      ... SIX.

    • @BURDYMAN777
      @BURDYMAN777 3 місяці тому +2

      Ive also heard most, if not all, of these in one way or another. I couldn't tell someone any of them, because I actually remember barely anything, but I've heard them lol

    • @davidbailey453
      @davidbailey453 3 місяці тому +1

      A fellow YT whitenoiser

    • @wailingalen
      @wailingalen 2 місяці тому

      Me too!! I am a fellow UA-cam white noiserer!!

  • @mersco
    @mersco 4 місяці тому +111

    I think the parker probe is .05%, not 5% the speed of light.

    • @Makabert.Abylon
      @Makabert.Abylon 4 місяці тому +10

      Not even that, 0.064%.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 4 місяці тому +6

      Yeah, that sounded just wrong. 5% would be a trip from earth to the sun and back like 4 times a day?

    • @Silverhornet81
      @Silverhornet81 4 місяці тому +21

      So much for making the Kessel Run in less than 12 Parsecs.

    • @jmmahony
      @jmmahony 4 місяці тому +15

      @@Makabert.Abylon .064%c is the fastest speed it will reach when it passes closest to the sun in 2025. But it hasn't gotten there yet, and its current speed is about .059%c.

    • @realname2490
      @realname2490 4 місяці тому

      A parsec in star wars seems to be different as our parsec is a unit of distance not time 😂​@@Silverhornet81

  • @colinhouseworth9027
    @colinhouseworth9027 4 місяці тому +59

    Parker solar probe speed. You were only off by about two orders of magnitude.

    • @davecopeland5437
      @davecopeland5437 4 місяці тому +20

      😂 .05% isn’t the same as 5%?! I heard that number and was like, “that can’t possibly be right!” We’d have probes on the way to other solar systems at that speed!

    • @anniealexander9911
      @anniealexander9911 4 місяці тому +4

      Yeah, I had to go double check that too 😁 Think someone got % and proportion mixed up

    • @xXxTeenSplayer
      @xXxTeenSplayer 4 місяці тому +3

      Is it really faster than Voyager(s)? That doesn't seem possible as those have velocities > the escape velocity of the Solar System. If the Parker probe is orbiting the Sun, it can't be faster than something escaping the solar system. Am I crazy?

    • @avypath
      @avypath 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@@xXxTeenSplayer looking it up online, the parker space probe is traveling around 400,000 mph

    • @xXxTeenSplayer
      @xXxTeenSplayer 4 місяці тому +1

      @@avypath And that means it's much slower than either Voyager, if memory serves

  • @johnrhodes7812
    @johnrhodes7812 3 місяці тому +2

    i really like this side project. Simons delivery is great.

  • @piovertheta3
    @piovertheta3 4 місяці тому +11

    Can’t believe I finished this whole video instead of sleeping for tomorrow’s workday. Immensely awesome video!

  • @sil-80nick
    @sil-80nick 4 місяці тому +2

    I just watched 2 hours of solutions for fixing the political turmoil here in the US.
    Thank you, Simon!

  • @abrisvegas
    @abrisvegas 3 місяці тому +4

    Poop bags on the moon could contain bacteria still alive…
    I think I’ve just come up with a new hypothesis for how life got started on Earth. Poop bags of aliens!

  • @Sika1956
    @Sika1956 4 місяці тому +5

    Some genuinely fascinating stuff here!
    But a correction if I may: the Parker solar probe does not travel at 5% of c.
    From Wikipedia: "It will approach to within 9.86 solar radii (6.9 million km or 4.3 million miles) from the center of the Sun, and by 2025 will travel, at closest approach, as fast as 690,000 km/h (430,000 mph) or 191 km/s, which is 0.064% the speed of light. It is the fastest object ever built."

  • @joab757
    @joab757 4 місяці тому +19

    Just the thought that the moon is tidally locked blows my mind. As well as the sun and moon being the same size in the sky!
    We live in a miraculous time

    • @jerelull9629
      @jerelull9629 4 місяці тому +3

      Yup! it's been miraculous for ever, as far as humans are concerned

    • @jack-qg9ub
      @jack-qg9ub 3 місяці тому

      We've been around longer than the solar eclipse just to blow your mind a little more

    • @vmwindustries
      @vmwindustries 3 місяці тому

      It's math, gravity, and where the dust needs to settle.

    • @vmwindustries
      @vmwindustries 3 місяці тому +1

      Amazing the fields of gravity.

  • @kenhammscousin4716
    @kenhammscousin4716 3 місяці тому +2

    Weird thing about hexagons, if you take circles of the same size, put one in the middle and surround it with the other circles, then trace the space around the center circle, you get a hexagon. I imagine hexagonal structures on the poles of gas planets may result from this principle, with vortexes, just a guess and it makes me sad that i'm not able to investigate.

  • @billyfugate4823
    @billyfugate4823 4 місяці тому +25

    Banana galaxies confirmed... brought to you by Sheath 😂

  • @esh_414
    @esh_414 3 місяці тому +1

    I put this on in the background while I was doing a project. Well, after about 10 minutes I wasn't doing that project anymore as this video took up 100% of my attention.

  • @jacksonstarky8288
    @jacksonstarky8288 4 місяці тому +3

    47 and 48 have always been topics of great interest to me for related reasons. I've long believed time travel to be practically impossible for exactly the reasons Simon mentions, and the Fermi paradox is no paradox at all when you consider the vastness of the universe, how long travel through it takes, and how rare habitable planets seem to be. Even if a planet is in the habitable zone, it still needs a composition that is biology-friendly, and that's probably the more difficult thing to achieve.

    • @LongJohnLiver
      @LongJohnLiver 3 місяці тому +1

      Totally agree. Intelligent life is likely so rare it wouldn't surprise me at all if we're the only ones in our galaxy.

  • @JBGOONERLIFE
    @JBGOONERLIFE 3 місяці тому +2

    Enjoyed this video immensely, superb mate. All the very best to you

  • @gm133t
    @gm133t 4 місяці тому +28

    Simon you killed me every time you pronounced geysers as geezers 🤣🤣🤣

    • @markstott6689
      @markstott6689 4 місяці тому +9

      Merely a British man speaking British English. Nothing to see here. 😊❤😊

    • @onebritishboi9892
      @onebritishboi9892 4 місяці тому +7

      Kings English here mate

    • @jeffdroog
      @jeffdroog 4 місяці тому +4

      That's how it's pronounced...

    • @aytee6730
      @aytee6730 4 місяці тому

      Am i the only one who is confused

    • @markstott6689
      @markstott6689 4 місяці тому +4

      @aytee6730 British vs. American pronunciation.

  • @rj795w6
    @rj795w6 3 місяці тому +2

    Yo simon, love this long format bunch of facts, it's great

  • @jorgelotr3752
    @jorgelotr3752 4 місяці тому +5

    1:30:40 In fact, Ceres was promoted. We've known Ceres since 1801, which is before the official discovery of Neptune (it had been sighted before, but mistaken for other things), and of course over a century before Pluto, yet it had never been regarded as a "planet" even after the discovery that Pluto was in fact smaller than Ceres. Pluto had only been regarded as a planet to make it the US planet.

  • @daviddupuis-u1d
    @daviddupuis-u1d 3 місяці тому +2

    Always enjoy your King's English

  • @alikaperdue
    @alikaperdue 4 місяці тому +19

    I believe you. There is a very very slim possibility that if I learned up against a door, that my head would pop through to the other side.
    The problem is, that there usually isn't enough probability left over for the rest of the body.
    Violating classic mechanics is all fun and games... until someone losses a head.

    • @jack-qg9ub
      @jack-qg9ub 3 місяці тому

      This is actually why you bleed when smashing your head against a wall. Some of the particles make it through

    • @charlesmaines6706
      @charlesmaines6706 3 місяці тому +1

      Or learns into a door😲

    • @snippysilver8357
      @snippysilver8357 3 місяці тому

      ​@@jack-qg9ub had me thinking for a second 😂

  • @minarikp
    @minarikp 3 місяці тому +2

    51:32 "The Moon's crust is thicker on its dark side" - Well, the Moon does not have a "dark" side. It has a "far" side that faces away from Earth due to it being tidally locked, but sunlight gets to that side just fine. :)

  • @stephenholmgren405
    @stephenholmgren405 4 місяці тому +4

    I was in middle school in the 80s, seeing this video back then would have been life changing

    • @Justin.Martyr
      @Justin.Martyr 2 місяці тому

      *How so????? How does ANY FACTS about Space, Change, Anything????*
      *Does it Strike Traitors against America, Dead????*

  • @SeauxNOLALady
    @SeauxNOLALady 3 місяці тому +1

    This is by far my favorite video from this channel in a long time! I’m a giant space nerd and I’m always looking for actually informative content that doesn’t just regurgitate the same well known facts that most other astronomy enthusiasts already know quite well. I did actually learn a couple things!

  • @marcusanthony9322
    @marcusanthony9322 4 місяці тому +6

    The problem with Kepler and other exoplanets that people seem to over look is that they are usually bigger than earth which is a huge problem for us. We have evolved to deal with the earths gravity, walking around an exoplanet like kepler, being twice the size of earth, would be like carrying a second you on your back as your heart struggles to stop your blood from pooling in your feet.

    • @sidpomy
      @sidpomy 4 місяці тому +3

      That's not entirely accurate. A planet twice the "size" of Earth will not necessarily have twice its gravity. Remember, these planets are more massive but also have larger radii. This can result in varying strengths of gravity at the surface, such that a planet could be much larger than Earth but have similar gravitational pull at the surface. It's estimated that Kepler 442b (the one talked about in the video) would have only 30% stronger gravity *assuming* it has similar interior makeup/density to Earth. It could easily be more or less as well.

    • @SavageDarknessGames
      @SavageDarknessGames 3 місяці тому

      Dous thou even hoist?!

    • @Rainbow_Oracle
      @Rainbow_Oracle 3 місяці тому

      Yeah the density of the planet is much more important than the actual size, but dealing with hyper gravity is definitely a valid concern.

  • @failmountain
    @failmountain 3 місяці тому +1

    Terminal velocity is the maximum speed an object will fall through a fluid, and Miranda having no atmosphere means there wouldn't be a terminal velocity

  • @mikurox3389
    @mikurox3389 4 місяці тому +4

    This video is a massive undertaking resulting in an awesome accomplishment with a poignant conclusion. Thank you for this.

  • @webx135
    @webx135 2 місяці тому +1

    Simon: "The collision with the Milky Way and Andromeda could re-ignite a quasar"
    Simon immediately after: "The collision with Andromeda might not be that eventful."

  • @pawnfish352
    @pawnfish352 3 місяці тому +4

    Was enjoying it until he said at about 12:30 in the video that the Parker solar probe is moving at 5% of the speed of light. Nope, it's moving much much much slower than that.

    • @LPMutagen
      @LPMutagen 3 місяці тому +3

      I just came back from checking on that. Looks like he probably meant .05%. The article I found gave 430,000 mph and .064% speed of light and the math checks out on that. I had just watched a Frasier Cain video yesterday where he interviewed some guy about interstellar probes that might be able to get to a % of light speed and they were talking about all these wild technologies like using antimatter on uranium as a propulsion system. When he said 5% I was like "wait what?"

  • @davesatxify
    @davesatxify 3 місяці тому +1

    You are an excellent host/presenter. you really seem to be enjoying telling us all of these facts. thanks

  • @Mrbiggsta1
    @Mrbiggsta1 4 місяці тому +15

    Parker Solar Probe is not going 5% the speed of light.

  • @baggaz167
    @baggaz167 4 місяці тому +2

    3:49 I know of one example of a hexagonal shape occurring in nature: beeswax cells.
    Usually, the suggestion is that multiple domes touching eachother would form into hexagon shapes because it ends up with the least amount of surface area while being the most structurally sound. (Probably explaining it badly but that's my memory of it anyway). Something similar could have happened on Saturn to create the hexagon on a massive scale.

  • @EmilyJelassi
    @EmilyJelassi 4 місяці тому +5

    What about "moonlet?" The ring galaxy looks really cool😮😊❤ I had no idea that there were banana-shaped galaxies 😮

    • @DenethordeSade.90
      @DenethordeSade.90 4 місяці тому

      Yeah moonlet is my favourite

    • @DenethordeSade.90
      @DenethordeSade.90 4 місяці тому

      I think it was NDT I heard call them moonlets before

    • @bertharius9518
      @bertharius9518 4 місяці тому +1

      Banana shaped? That's an easy slip-up to make

  • @jordanmessner999
    @jordanmessner999 2 місяці тому +1

    Imagine creating a groundbreaking technology that could go 10% the speed of light, and it still takes 270,000 years to get to the center of just OUR galaxy. The universe has no chill.

  • @Makabert.Abylon
    @Makabert.Abylon 4 місяці тому +33

    The Parker solar probe will travel at 0.064% the speed of light when it speeds up passing by the sun 2025.

    • @p18yurd
      @p18yurd 4 місяці тому +5

      Came here for this. The whole world came to a record-scratch stop when I heard "...something something 5% the speed of light."

    • @hamilde
      @hamilde 4 місяці тому +5

      I was here for the same thing. I didn't want to sound like a troll, but that was a huge mistake.

    • @StealthyOgre
      @StealthyOgre 3 місяці тому +2

      I immediately hit up the googles. 5% C!?! I don't think so.

    • @ojmattila6407
      @ojmattila6407 28 днів тому

      I was just about to fall asleep when snapped awake going "wait what"😂

  • @mayanightstar
    @mayanightstar 3 місяці тому +1

    Fastest way to get me to cry: talk about the golden records

  • @Roguescienceguy
    @Roguescienceguy 4 місяці тому +6

    Our moon has moonitos. A SpaceX-booster, A chinese rocket, some UAE-thing that doesn't do much and possibly a golfball😂

  • @EmmanuelGosse-yc7su
    @EmmanuelGosse-yc7su 2 місяці тому +1

    Nobody can do everything, but everybody can do something.

  • @Morganstein-Railroad
    @Morganstein-Railroad 4 місяці тому +23

    Item 1 - Banana Shaped Galaxies. Ever thought about Gravitational Lensing, Whwere the high gravity of an object between us and that which we see curves space so that the image of the more distant galaxy is curved so that it looks banana shaped from our viewpoint.

    • @aceundead4750
      @aceundead4750 4 місяці тому +7

      I assume scientists took that into account before publishing their studies about them.

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx 4 місяці тому

      @@aceundead4750
      "I assume scientists took that into account before publishing their studies about them"
      Actual research papers vs news articles often botch details.

    • @charlesmaines6706
      @charlesmaines6706 3 місяці тому

      That's what she said😉

  • @fatalfury66
    @fatalfury66 4 місяці тому +1

    This is been by far one of my favorite episodes you've ever done

  • @EShirako
    @EShirako 3 місяці тому +11

    "VERY thin...only 400 kilometers thick." Welp, that's MY sense of scale spraining itself forever. Thanks, Sun! o.O;

    • @stpfs9281
      @stpfs9281 3 місяці тому

      Terra-centric existence and ideas.

    • @charlesachurch7265
      @charlesachurch7265 Місяць тому

      The ISS orbits at 450km . Space? my arse. It's travelling so fast It's in free fall.

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 9 днів тому

      ​@charlesachurch7265 not exactly. It's in "free fall" because it isn't at the correct angle. It's basically a rock skipping on the surface of a pond

    • @charlesachurch7265
      @charlesachurch7265 9 днів тому

      @@captainspaulding5963 it's space Jim,but not as we know it.

  • @pseudotasuki
    @pseudotasuki 4 місяці тому +2

    The Parker Solar Probe isn't moving anywhere close to 5% of the speed of light.

  • @dudeman8323
    @dudeman8323 3 місяці тому +3

    Neutron star, meet man made turbo. Revolutions per second.

  • @thedolt9215
    @thedolt9215 3 місяці тому +1

    Excellent! This is the stuff I like to see Simon!

  • @phantomtrv4754
    @phantomtrv4754 4 місяці тому +12

    idk much about other smart youtuber in this genre but Sideprojects might just be one of the smartest.. he just gives off genius aura

    • @Eztoez
      @Eztoez 4 місяці тому

      He's just the presenter. The scripts are written for him. He gets paid a lot of money to advertise awful embarrassing shoddy products while trying to appear enthusiastic and not cringing on the inside.

    • @Sageof6Paths9
      @Sageof6Paths9 4 місяці тому +8

      i mean to be fair on literally EVERY other of his channels he's very open about that fact lol

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 4 місяці тому

      Thunderbolts Project

    • @nmgg6928
      @nmgg6928 4 місяці тому

      Ya Simon has mentioned a few times how he reads the scripts and a lot of the info is just in one ear and out the other and he doesn't retain much lol

    • @jerelull9629
      @jerelull9629 4 місяці тому

      Simon's good, of course, but the gold standard for me in astrophysics is Dr. Becky Smethurst. She has a book out that I'm interested in reading. Girl is SO enthusiastic and a great science explainer. Her speciality and first love is super massive black holes, but she'll propound entertainingly about anything that strikes her fancy.

  • @Baldev
    @Baldev 3 місяці тому +1

    This is fantastic. Good job Simon.

  • @toadcemetery
    @toadcemetery 4 місяці тому +8

    The golden record being the last fact was so sweet. The record itself is a wonderful thing, and despite how cruel humanity can be it still shows the love we have for our human nature.

    • @mjinba07
      @mjinba07 4 місяці тому +2

      I'm not so sure the recording is a wonderful thing. It's like describing your lovely home and family in a post on the internet and providing a map to your address. We should probably hope it's never discovered.

    • @toadcemetery
      @toadcemetery 4 місяці тому +1

      @mjinba07 Imo, that's not the same thing. We don't have proof of other life, but we still sent something out there anyway in case there was. Sorry you don't find it as fascinating as I do 🤷‍♂️ /nm /nsrs

    • @mjinba07
      @mjinba07 3 місяці тому

      @@toadcemetery I do find it fascinating. And naïve.

    • @signusthewizard9847
      @signusthewizard9847 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@toadcemetery he's referencing the Dark forest hypothesis I'm pretty sure. It's a really cool read but it is scary. I'd be both excited and scared if alien life found/contacted us.

    • @toadcemetery
      @toadcemetery 3 місяці тому

      @@signusthewizard9847 Ooh, okay! Never heard of that before, I'll check it out to understand better

  • @theBaron001
    @theBaron001 3 місяці тому +1

    What exactly are you counting as "all the stars in andromeda" to qualify it as stretching across a third of the sky?
    As an astrophotographer, I can tell you It fits inside 2x frames from my normal wide-angle rig, and the moon fits well within just the centre of a single frame.
    In relative terms, andromeda appears around 178 arcminutes wide, while the moon is only around 31 arcminutes wide. There's 60 arcminutes to a degree, and, assuming no immediate obstacles, you've got 180 degrees of night sky around you.

  • @EmmanuelBrito
    @EmmanuelBrito 4 місяці тому +5

    The NEW UPDATE gave Simon elbows 😮

  • @johnrhodes7812
    @johnrhodes7812 3 місяці тому +1

    Im 57, and I still giggle everytime Simon says "on Uranus".

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 9 днів тому

      41 here, and it's still amusing every time, and I'll hear no arguments otherwise 😂

  • @jake_
    @jake_ 3 місяці тому +3

    Squeeze circles of equal size together and you get hexagons. It is neither a mystery nor does it require super complicated math. It's the reason why honeycomb cells are hexagonal for example.

    • @cosmicHalArizona
      @cosmicHalArizona 3 місяці тому +1

      Well that's good to know😮

    • @bobbritches846
      @bobbritches846 2 місяці тому

      But where are the circles. Just one hex on that planet's pole.

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 9 днів тому

      ​@@bobbritches846 what they are implying (and it's actually an extremely apt explanation) is that there were multiple large storms that eventually came together to form the current hexagon

    • @bobbritches846
      @bobbritches846 9 днів тому

      @@captainspaulding5963 -Oh Ok. Yes I understand now. 👍 Thanks

  • @kylevanzandbergen3285
    @kylevanzandbergen3285 4 місяці тому +2

    Raising the bar for yourself right at the beginning, ok Fact Boy, you've got my attention.

  • @pieterduplessis6632
    @pieterduplessis6632 4 місяці тому +3

    H1821+643 is the closest known Quasar at a distance of approximately 3.4 billion light years.

  • @jaxmarshall291
    @jaxmarshall291 3 місяці тому +1

    I am a huge fan of your channels but just want to issue a correction. Top speed projected to be hit by the Parker Solar Probe is ~430,000mph which equates to about 0.064% the speed of light. It is still the fastest ever man-made object, but it will never get anywhere near 5% the Speed of light.

  • @Blinkerd00d
    @Blinkerd00d 4 місяці тому +4

    I can recall a poster we had in a classroom when I was in elementary school, ca. 1990, that claimed Saturn had 21 moons.

    • @aste4949
      @aste4949 4 місяці тому

      Saturn and Jupiter have been in a rap battle style fight but with moons since the 80's. Jupiter was winning at 93 moons, then Saturn came back with way over a dozen more in a single swoop, now clocking in at *124.*

    • @Blinkerd00d
      @Blinkerd00d 4 місяці тому

      @@aste4949 Jupiter will just suck in some more big asteroids flying by to make up the numbers

  • @LiteRaRally-vd5tf
    @LiteRaRally-vd5tf 3 місяці тому +1

    My head is still intact after watching the whole video

  • @ovidiumiinea5462
    @ovidiumiinea5462 4 місяці тому +3

    96 poo monsters from the moon - sounds like an Oscar winner

    • @couturestalker8606
      @couturestalker8606 4 місяці тому

      If it were my cat’s poop - you can bet Alien franchise will become a documentary at some point

  • @bobbylon5
    @bobbylon5 3 місяці тому +1

    Adds a super like to this presentation.

  • @aliteraldude7658
    @aliteraldude7658 4 місяці тому +5

    I'm honestly pleased with how many of these I actually knew

  • @EbyTheDragon
    @EbyTheDragon 3 місяці тому +1

    1:37:05 my ex's dad was an astronomer who worked at the Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona, USA some 30-40 years ago. He had a number of glass slides of pictures they got of distant stars, galaxies, and nebulas. I'm very positive he had one of UY Scuti.

  • @brad4texas
    @brad4texas 4 місяці тому +13

    One hour, 52 minutes: be really great to index by topics in the description. Producing team ℹ️.

    • @jeffdroog
      @jeffdroog 4 місяці тому

      Or you could just watch the fuck8ng video lol

    • @Demonic_Tang
      @Demonic_Tang 4 місяці тому +6

      Why don't you index it? Be the commentor everyone likes

    • @jeffdroog
      @jeffdroog 4 місяці тому

      @@Demonic_Tang because he is lazy as fuck,doesn't make his content,let alone contribute to someone else's lol

    • @brad4texas
      @brad4texas 4 місяці тому

      @@Demonic_Tang not my stuff. 🖕🫵

  • @smac1706
    @smac1706 3 місяці тому +2

    People, if you're smart enough to enjoy these facts, you're also smart enough to understand that sometimes he does this (misleading things to enough people) on purpose because of this exact result. It makes a good number of people talk about it in the comments, therefore helping with the algorithm... and when you know that it's intentional, you can then realize how smart of a tactic it really is...💯🤦🤷‍♂️🤣

  • @jacksonstarky8288
    @jacksonstarky8288 4 місяці тому +14

    We need the Copernican Principle to be taught in all schools, public and private, as soon as students are old enough to understand the concepts... and then we need to mandate its teaching, regardless of how the entities controlling the private schools feel about it, if they want to keep their schools open. People being allowed to teach their children that the scientific method is wrong is most of why we're in the mess we're in now.

    • @KathrynElizabethJaneway
      @KathrynElizabethJaneway 3 місяці тому +4

      And religion as a school subject should be removed entirely. If you want to learn about them, maybe add a few quick history lessons about them when you learn the history of that area; for more info, go to church.

    • @racinmoeherdez4434
      @racinmoeherdez4434 3 місяці тому +2

      ... I WENT TO SCHOOL FOR 17 YEARS MORE OR LESS, WHEN I FINALLY FINISHED I STOP TURNED AROUND AND TOOK A DEEP LOOK ...

    • @racinmoeherdez4434
      @racinmoeherdez4434 3 місяці тому +4

      ... THERE WAS A LOT OF LIES IN MY EDUCATION, THAT WAS 30 yrs AGO, I'M STILL TRYING TO FIX IT.
      IT WAS A LOT OF TIME WASTED.

    • @ChrisFord-wh1gl
      @ChrisFord-wh1gl 3 місяці тому +2

      That and we’re selfish egotistical and cowardly, but yah teaching lies is bad. But it’s all lies history science geology. They can’t even get through health and home ec.without lying.

    • @Havok_Arms
      @Havok_Arms Місяць тому

      ​@KathrynElizabethJaneway absolutely not, religion as a subject contains a lot of "lessons learned through past experience" we can make them electives, but they are important enough to not remove them.

  • @SteveWhipp
    @SteveWhipp Місяць тому +1

    That was awesome.

  • @3vi1J
    @3vi1J 4 місяці тому +6

    Breaking up an asteroid with bombs might result in many smaller ones still heading towards us, but it would also mean each has a larger surface area exposed to the atmosphere and would therefore burn off more material on the way to the ground than one large asteroid. Also, if it was done early enough, a large portion of the original material would likely miss the earth entirely. So, it still seems like a legitimate last resort if the asteroid cannot have it's course corrected in time.

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 9 днів тому

      And as terrible as it may sound, even if chunks make it through and hit multiple areas, that prospect is still fairly less dangerous than one gigantic impact.

  • @riseofthethorax
    @riseofthethorax 3 місяці тому +1

    HE HAS HAD THIS VIDEO UP FOR 8 DAYS, AND HAS COLLECTED 442,594 VIEWS AND HIS SUBSCRIBERSHIP IS 1 MILLION. HOW LONG HAS HE BEEN UP, AND HOW MANY UA-camRS HAVE 50% RETENTION?

  • @gamerjaqi7873
    @gamerjaqi7873 4 місяці тому +7

    oooh earliest ive caught one 42 sec ago lol

  • @chadwolf3840
    @chadwolf3840 3 місяці тому +1

    Damn that’s some fascinating stuff. Well done.

  • @blodstainer
    @blodstainer 4 місяці тому +4

    I giggle every time Simon says uranus

    • @graphixkillzzz
      @graphixkillzzz 4 місяці тому +1

      i cackled when he said something like "Miranda got slapped around by Uranus" bruh 😂...I'm dying 🤣👉

  • @bulasev
    @bulasev 3 місяці тому +1

    12:54 Bro... if humanity could reach 5% light speed we could be sending interstellar probes. The Parker Solar Probe didn't even reach 0.0005% of the speed of light. 0.00023% to be precise.

  • @graphixkillzzz
    @graphixkillzzz 4 місяці тому +3

    i mean, technically, planets are just satellite orbiting a star, so "moons" are already sub-satellites 🤔🤷‍♂️

    • @wingerding
      @wingerding 4 місяці тому

      The word satellite has long been commonly used to refer to moons.

    • @phillipcoetzer8186
      @phillipcoetzer8186 3 місяці тому +1

      Using that train of logic ... the sun revolves arround Sagittarius A so planets are sub satellites.

  • @nc5337
    @nc5337 12 днів тому

    Re Hoag’s: It’s not only amazing that the two ring galaxies line up from our perspective, but that they line up AND are both oriented so that we see through both rings nearly straight on.

  • @graphixkillzzz
    @graphixkillzzz 4 місяці тому +4

    i wonder if there is a way that a large mass could almost catch the light from our galaxy and bend it 180° to come back to us. like extreme gravitational lensing. could be a way to see our galaxy in a "mirror" 🤔🤷‍♂️

    • @DenethordeSade.90
      @DenethordeSade.90 4 місяці тому +2

      That's quite interesting, I wonder if we will be able to do this one day in the future

  • @Guy-z6o
    @Guy-z6o 3 місяці тому +1

    I love the very subtle reference to Christianity. The door handles and lock resemble a crucifix. (I could be experiencing pareidolia).

  • @98integraGSR
    @98integraGSR 4 місяці тому +5

    Fun fact- because of Europa's low gravity (.134g), the pressure at the bottom of its 150km deep ocean would only be ~28,500 psi (around 1.8 times the pressure at the bottom of the Marianas Trench, aka 15,750 psi). While that's nothing to scoff at, it's well within the reach of even today's technology.
    If Europa had the same gravity as Earth, though? It would be 212,720 psi 😳

    • @calebbean1384
      @calebbean1384 4 місяці тому

      Saturn would also float in an ocean

  • @theWinterWalker
    @theWinterWalker 3 місяці тому +1

    I listen to Simon as an autistic adhd person when my anxiety is OP, it's the BEST distraction. Paired with my dark room, smell good candles, and weighted blanket.

    • @theWinterWalker
      @theWinterWalker 3 місяці тому

      Going to pretend he said Iapetus, not Lapetus🤧

  • @pppetter
    @pppetter 4 місяці тому +5

    The Andromeda galaxy covers 3 degrees of sky, not a third.

    • @jmmahony
      @jmmahony 4 місяці тому +3

      I was going to say the same thing, since that's about the size in a typical long-exposure astrophoto. But he said if we could see _all_ its stars and gas. That would include its extremely faint outer halo, which would indeed make it that large.

    • @pppetter
      @pppetter 3 місяці тому

      @@jmmahony So, you're saying that the Andromeda galaxy really is 20 times bigger than we see on photos? It's 2 500 000 lightyears away, and 260 000 lightyears across. So, a football, diameter 22 cm, would cover 60 degrees of your visual field if it was 220 cm away from your face?

    • @jmmahony
      @jmmahony 3 місяці тому

      @@pppetter Yes, it surprised me when I checked. I knew that the outer halo is significantly larger than what we normally think of as the visible galaxy, but I checked (actually for the Milky Way's outer halo, not Andromeda's, since I figured we probably know that number better, and it would be easier to find references, but they're both large spiral galaxies, so I'm assuming Andromeda's would be proportional.) But double-checking, it looks like those are recent results, so they may not hold up. Earlier results (and what my memory told me) was that the halo is only a few times bigger than the "visible" galaxy. That includes stars and gas (which Simon specified), but not the dark matter component, which I suspect is not as accurately known. BTW the math in your last line is wrong, or you missed a digit. A football 220 cm diameter, not 22, would be about 60 degrees wide at 220 cm distance (60 degrees is conveniently close to 1 radian).

    • @pppetter
      @pppetter 3 місяці тому

      @@jmmahony My math is sound, albeit maybe based on faulty numbers. Conventionally M31 is considered approx 2 500 000 ly away, and approx 250 000 ly in diameter (ie the distance is ten times the diameter = not covering 60% of visual field).
      However... I read up on the halo as you mentioned. And my mind is blown.
      "Scientists were surprised to find that this tenuous, nearly invisible halo of diffuse plasma extends 1.3 million light-years from the galaxy-about halfway to our Milky Way-and as far as 2 million light-years in some directions. This means that Andromeda’s halo is already bumping into the halo of our own galaxy." (Source: science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-maps-giant-halo-around-andromeda-galaxy/)
      That is simultaneously so cool and scary at the same time.

  • @Onithyr
    @Onithyr 3 місяці тому +1

    Ah man, when you started talking about Schwarzschild radius I was hoping you'd mention what happens to the "density" (specifically the ratio of the black hole's mass to the volume of the event horizon) as you reach absurdly large masses. Spoiler: it can be less dense than water.
    For the objects we are familiar with, volume is proportional to mass. For the volume of a sphere: doubling the radius requires octupling the volume, which means octupling (8x) the volume and mass of the sphere. Or, rearranged, a doubling of the mass would result in ³√2x (~1.26x) increase in radius. We instinctively understand that mass increases much faster than radius.
    But the Schwarzschild radius is different. The *radius* is proportional to the mass. That means doubling the mass doubles the radius, which octuples the volume. This results in absurdly low densities for the most massive objects in the universe.
    Fun fact: if you add up all the mass in the observable universe and calculated the Schwarzschild radius, it'd result in a black hole bigger than the observable universe.

  • @EricGranata
    @EricGranata 4 місяці тому +4

    ASTRONOMERS: there are 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe
    US NATIONAL DEBT: hold my beer

    • @jacksonstarky8288
      @jacksonstarky8288 4 місяці тому +2

      The big difference is that galaxies are real, while money isn't. There is always money available for things that the powers that be want to happen, like another war, while there is almost never money available for things that might actually improve the quality of life for working Americans.

    • @captainspaulding5963
      @captainspaulding5963 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@jacksonstarky8288 this is even more true than ever considering that the vast majority of "money" these days is all digital

  • @ImpactEtching
    @ImpactEtching 4 місяці тому +1

    Simon, not every video you had been doing recently was interesting, but this time it is interesting AND long, cudos

  • @taylorrenee4880
    @taylorrenee4880 3 місяці тому +5

    Love how he thinks God and Jesus is a joke, but that the Big Bang was real and something was created out of nothing.

    • @lofibeats6332
      @lofibeats6332 3 місяці тому +2

      Same goes to God who created god. Ooo you would say god is alpha and omega. god is Almighty and he was before there from the beginning and your explanation would be based on a religious book. If you can't explain something you don't understand you shouldn't give the credits god

    • @drummerdoingstuff5020
      @drummerdoingstuff5020 2 місяці тому +2

      You totally missed his point, God would have no beginning and therefore need no explanation but the Universe on the other hand…. Funfact, a Belgian Priest theorized the Big Bang. Why didn’t he just claim God like you accuse others? Maybe we agree that you shouldn’t just claim God for things we don’t know.

  • @MintyFreshDragonBreath
    @MintyFreshDragonBreath 3 місяці тому +1

    Interesting material! Thanks for sharing!

  • @ADgamingHD
    @ADgamingHD 22 дні тому

    Fun fact. The gravitational pull of a neutron star is so strong that if you could somehow stand on its surface and you built a 1 metre high wall then proceeded to stand on and jump off said wall you'd be travelling at around 1 million mph when you hit the floor. You wouldn't just splat either you would in all likelihood be broken down to your base atoms and spread evenly across the stars entire surface.

  • @ryanc.6723
    @ryanc.6723 4 місяці тому +36

    Don’t like this comment

    • @Lngbrdninjamasta
      @Lngbrdninjamasta 4 місяці тому +3

      I am so glad u said nothing about commenting 😁

    • @karenshadle365
      @karenshadle365 4 місяці тому

      ​@@Lngbrdninjamasta
      Good one😅

    • @rubenvd3913
      @rubenvd3913 4 місяці тому +3

      Instructions unclear. But I gave you a like anyway.

    • @RoseJ1983
      @RoseJ1983 4 місяці тому

      @@rubenvd3913nice

    • @stephenholmgren405
      @stephenholmgren405 4 місяці тому +1

      A small little like button on my phone in a caste, infinite, complex universe. Awesome idea 💡 ik that's totally what you were going for

  • @HoLeeFoc
    @HoLeeFoc 2 дні тому +1

    Here I thought that Uranus was pronounced "YOU RA NESS" when in reality it is pronounced "YOUR ANUS" 🤣😂

  • @SynthLikeKnives
    @SynthLikeKnives 3 місяці тому +1

    If Young Jeezy was an astronomer, "space stupid dumb big even moons got moons."

  • @proman3578
    @proman3578 4 місяці тому +2

    I Always remember Neil Degrase Tyson whenever Simon says Uranus. As Simon’s pronunciation is considered by Tyson as one from an eighth year old.

  • @Anuxinamoon
    @Anuxinamoon 3 місяці тому +1

    I appreciate this video ! Thank you for these awesome facts

  • @ADgamingHD
    @ADgamingHD 22 дні тому +1

    I want to know if lenticular galaxies are actually just spiral galaxies looked at from the side. If not then how do astronomers tell them apart from actual spiral galaxies viewed from the side?

  • @NakedSageAstrology
    @NakedSageAstrology 3 місяці тому +2

    It's not a pickle, it's a Shiva Lingam. 🙏

  • @jimmiedmc1
    @jimmiedmc1 15 днів тому +1

    57:34 number 47 my own theory is that the two points could be anchored by the earths magnitic field cross refrenced by the solar magnetic field then compounded by the background radiation from the big bang

  • @RangelMladenov
    @RangelMladenov 4 місяці тому +1

    I love these long over one hour episodes!
    I hope there are more in the future!