Jeremy Corbyn: On antisemitism, the media, and UK's coronavirus response [Exclusive Interview]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 чер 2020
- “The party bureaucracy was so leaden-footed, it couldn’t appreciate what was actually happening on the ground.”
For the first time since he stepped down as leader of the UK Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn speaks on the antisemitism probe, the role of the media and what led to his historic election loss against Boris Johnson.
Watch our exclusive in-depth interview with Jeremy Corbyn.
Subscribe to our channel: ow.ly/AVlW30n1OWH
Middle East Eye Website: middleeasteye.net
Like us on Facebook: / middleeasteye
Follow us on Twitter: / middleeasteye
Follow us on Instagram: / middleeasteye
Breaks my heart everytime I think how wrong the country did JC💔💔💔💔💔🥺🥺
True
Political education is what's needed in the UK all we have is Tory propaganda. The UK citizens who didn't vote for Corbyn not only let themselves, their country and we Brits who campaigned for Corbyn down badly but deprived our country of the chance of a lifetime we will never get that wonderful chance again.
Genuinely decent bloke. Real shame about the #ScumMedia
At 34:50 See how manipulative the Tories are? They’re not interested 1 bit in the truth and only how they can manipulate public opinion in their favour with “Corbyn the terrorist sympathiser” rhetoric.
@@naveed210 He is though. And a anti-semite. Don't panic though, due to his unelectablility, we have 5 years of Boris to look forward to and Brexit has happened. Cheers Jezza!
@gav2102 Horray indeed. Just as well more people agree with me than you or we would have magic Granpa in charge giving out free broadband and taking money off the working to give to the idle. Now run along back to your rioting and desecratng the cenotaph you lefty, lental muching twat.
@@neildobie4094 You are the very thing Corbyn talks about with factless over privileged propaganda and attacks. Learn a little modern economics and try not to sound like the tabloid gutter press. More successful countries than the failing UK offer free broadband and have better tax structures, you absolute 'knuckle dragger'.
He's a good man. Looking at how the government has conducted themselves I would genuinely be embarrassed to have voted Tory.
Great interview. I really hope this leads to serious discussions on bias in our media, corruption in our civil services, national economics and our country's role in the world.
It won’t happen, even less so in Britain than in America. The tabloids here are easy to identify in who they’re backing, broadcast is a little trickier, they’re less partisan than shows in America where the lines are clear for all to see.
Professional ethics are out in the civil service in any and all EU countries, for a few decades been subborn servants of neoliberal policies of right governments, sabotage and even trying to take down elected ministers, hand in hand with msm, on diverging policy.
In 1972, as a young 18-year-old soldier, I served in both Londonderry (Derry) and Belfast, and witnessed events on all sides that will stay with me forever.
I know what it’s like to be shot at (more than once) and to lose three comrades to IRA snipers. I have experienced the aftermath of sectarian killings, be it by bullet or bomb.
I guess most former soldiers would have experienced some or all of these events too, however, this is where the connection between us ends.
Unlike the majority of those who served in Northern Ireland, I have been openly critical of the role of the security forces and successive governments during the period of the Troubles.
This has led to me too being labelled everything from IRA supporter to terrorist sympathiser. Again, the confusion seems to stem from the words “understand” and “condone.”
I was critical because I witnessed how the Catholic community suffered unnecessary treatment at the hands of the security forces, some of which was not only unlawful, but also damaging to the role which I believed the British army was there to fulfil.
Moreover, I would argue those actions helped to turn the Catholic community - which in the early days of the Troubles was supportive or at least indifferent to the British army - firmly against its presence in Northern Ireland.
On reflection, I can see why the Catholic community felt aggrieved at being disadvantaged in what appears to be every aspect of civil rights.
I can comprehend the frustration and anger as parents tried to clothe and feed their children while all the time being faced with inequality and poverty.
I shudder to think what it was like in 1971, being subject to a curfew because you were a Catholic living in the Falls Road and having your possessions broken and floorboards ripped up during the search for weapons that the majority of people never had.
I can understand the fear of children watching as their fathers and older brothers (it was predominately men) were stopped, searched and, on occasions, physically and/or verbally assaulted, before being taken away for “screening.”
I have absolutely no idea how I would comfort my young children while soldiers with camouflaged, blacked faces carrying rifles woke them in their bed as they search the wardrobes, toy boxes and under the mattresses they sleep on.
I can’t imagine how I would react if a member of my family was shot dead by the security forces who had claimed that they were armed and had fired first when I knew that it was a blatant lie - when no weapon existed and the authorities covered up the act, leaving an uphill struggle for the relatives to obtain justice for the victim.
Having witnessed some of these events, can I understand why some people chose to join the IRA? Yes. Can I understand why they would want to harm the security forces? Yes. Do I condone the killing of anyone? No. And that’s the difference.
Does this make me a terrorist sympathizer? Absolutely not. What my experience did was provide me with an understanding of why someone may choose to join a terrorist organization.
Corbyn came to the conclusion that talking and compromise were the only solutions to the Troubles many years before the peace talks began - and history shows he was right.
This was because he took the time to understand the situation, which is a far cry from condoning what was being done.
Finally, Corbyn is correct in suggesting the UK’s actions abroad have done nothing to reduce the risk of terrorism and a fundamental change of policy is required.
Like in the ’70s, Corbyn once again understands the situation, and this is what sets him apart from the warmongers.
RICHARD RUDKIN
Stop on;-)
Thank you for that .... rare to hear that someone is able to see both sides, especially having served over there. I salute you. I see Corbyn as a very human human being. I cannot understand why anyone would believe the mass propaganda machine that slandered him during his years as leader, especially as he had lead so many people back to Labour. It's a shame that people believe what they read about him over and above seeing his diligent work and political integrity. Having said that, profit has always come before people and the rich are firmly in control of the propaganda machine. Sad.
One of the good guys.
Definitely! 👍
He's a good man.
the most divisive leader in Labour History and unsurprisingly the biggest loser. Your moral compass is fucked.
@@henrik5899 Please use appropriate language as you sound like a troll. He is the best PM we never had as opposed to Johnson who is the worst PM we have ever had.
@@ThePeggy39 fortunately most of us sniffed him out. You'll either grow up, or develop an IQ and when you do you'll discover He's an unintelligent twat. And a nasty racist to boot. As for the best PM, he managed to produce the WORST RESULTS EVER for Labour. EVER. Unimaginable.
@@henrik5899 Thank goodness JC always kept his dignity and didn't stoop to calling people names unlike your uneducated self. He is very educated and well rd. have you ever been to one of his literary talks. I think not.
Henri k your moral compass doesn’t even exist...
A man with out ego
I have no regrets backing him. He really stuck to his guns, is humble and not willing to compromise on his ideals.
Yeah, he definitely didn't insist on being interim Prime Minister over a caretaker Prime Minister when that was an option.
I like him, but he does have an ego, no doubt.
@@elliotjohnson9415 we all do - it's impossible not to have one. What people should say of someone like JC is his ego is under control ; a well controlled ego is the sign of modesty and a healthy person.
He sounds like a very capable man. So much more capable than boris. We all misses out here.
a great guy. the establishment really did him dirty. i hope he writes a book and includes his relationship with the media & how they treated him.
Me too! (Though he's very busy with his Peace And Justice project right now. And it looks like he'll probably have to fight his seat as an independent. ☹️)
I miss him !!! :'(
Me too!! 😢
Finally a long interview, in good faith with serious journalists on important issues. A bit late.
This is a kid-gloves interview. JC is too feeble to be PM, so faster paced interviews make him look unappealing. Andrew Neil made him look more corrupt than trump.
@@evertonwood sadly i agree, though i sit on the left politically..andrew neil would never push around george galloway..he would get pushed back..
Quality interview, very informative.
Best PM we never had.
Tony Benn- "Hold my Stout...."
Worst PM we never had! THANK GOD
@@jb894 the current one let 10,000s people die but OK trolly
He’s a much more clever man than the media ever presented him to be
One of the very very very very few living members/prior members of a British Parliament who deserves the title Right Honourable.
.I couldn't agree more, Daz. All "professional politicians" coming through these days. Only in it for what they can get out of it. Not to genuinely serve the best interests of their constituents..
@@bobknowles90 Exactly. Serve there own interests and open as many doors as possible for when themselves when they exit government. At least its finally becoming obvious to Joe Public now.
Charming
Top man, wish he'd fought back hard against the traitors, but he's a much more tolerant person than me 🤔
As architect of the disastrous 2nd referendum position, shouldn't Starmer have resigned also, and not stood in the leadership election ?
A very decent man. We missed out there, would have been the best PM this country has ever had... for ordinary folk.
Thanks for posting
Jeremy Corbyn, the best PM the UK never had.
Had the likes of BoJo or Trump experienced a fraction of the mistreatment by the press, they would have decried to the heavens.
Despite repeated attempts by the very skilled interviewers, Corbyn maintained the moral high ground - a man of integrity.
Are you on glue? You're saying that Corbyn gets more negative press than Trump?!
What you on about? Trump has been attacked non stop by the media from day 1. Are you living under a rock?
Trump has had more negative press than any political figure in history!
The media was horrific towards him but he was also the author of his own downfall because he failed to remove his political opponents in Labour from the start.
What could have been
Corbyn is a man of principle.
Corbyn is wrong to say he would have lost remain seats if he had taken a principled position on upholding the vote he could have mobilised both the remainers who wanted to honour the 2016 vote (of which they was a lot) with the leave vote which was numerically the most significant...and where the key seats were..
I agree. Labours Remain seats were all in strongholds and could've absorbed the hit had the 2nd Vote Brexit Policy not come around, the largely marginal Leave seats couldn't which is why they all collapsed. Two Thirds of Labour Seats were Leave voting ones and the majority of those were marginals - the Brexit Policy was an electoral suicide note and the Blairites knew that which was why they deliberately pushed for such a policy. They were more afraid of a Corbyn led Government than one of Johnson led Tory one.
I voted Remain but wouldn't have been opposed to Corbyn-led soft Brexit with Customs Union & Single Market access Brexit.
Peter Oborne of Cambridge University worked for NM Rothschild, which through De Beers controlled 90% of global trade in diamonds in the 20th century. Zimbabwe could produce 20% of the world's supply of diamonds from it's Chiadzwa and Marange diamond fields. If it did so at once, it would suppress the price of diamonds for a generation to come, and severly hit the Israeli economy, for whom South African diamonds from De Beers are their biggest single export.
Then, there is the fact that Zimbabwe efficiently redistributed the land that was stolen under colonialism and UDI. If you look at the fine grain of history, you will see that this land problem starts in the UK, which has and even worse ratio of land to ownership than Zimbabwe had before landreform. It was in the UK that people were first thrown off their land.
(Guardian UK) Want to tackle inequality? Then first change our land ownership laws
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/04/tackle-inequality-land-ownership-laws
So Peter Oborne wanted economic sanctions against Zimbabwe, and he wanted President Mbeki of South Africa to act as an extension of London. Clearly he didn't trust that landreform would fail on it's own.
publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmfaff/339/339a09.htm
Memorandum from Mr Peter Oborne
"If Rwanda happened again today . . . we would have a moral duty to act there"-Tony Blair, 2 October 2001.
Rwanda is starting to happen again, this time in Zimbabwe. So far the British Government is doing nothing to prevent it. It is ignoring its moral duty.
There are many signs of this, including:
- the procrastination in imposing targeted sanctions and getting Zimbabwe thrown out of the councils of the Commonwealth;
- the defeatist government briefing to political editors that the Prime Minister's "mission to Africa" should not be judged on Zimbabwe;
- the failure of the Government to call a debate in Parliament as the crisis has deepened;
- British readiness to undermine the integrity of the sanctions regime. A notable recent example was British connivance with the EU decision last November to move the location of the Southern African Development Community Foreign Ministers' summit from Copenhagen to Mozambique, so that Zimbabwean Ministers could attend; and,
- the decision to hand control of policy to an Under-Secretary of State based in the House of Lords.
There is no doubt that the makers of British foreign policy are men and women of decency and good will. And it is true that finding a solution is hard. But Mugabe is destroying Zimbabwe, and killing her people. The country is on the verge of catastrophe. Britain and the international community are washing our hands of the whole dirty business.
It is true that targeted sanctions have been applied-although they have been applied too late and with too little vigour. And it is true that Zimbabwe has been suspended from the councils of the Commonwealth. But these are little more than gestures. They have eased the conscience of the West, but have done no more than irritate Mugabe.
A more active and urgent approach is needed. Britain and the international community must show conviction. That would entail:
1. In November 2001, the Prime Minister stated that he would "make Africa a major personal priority and a priority for the Labour Government." His policy towards Zimbabwe should reflect that commitment. He should not pretend, as his advisers seem to, that Zimbabwe is a special case where nothing can be done. That is unacceptable.
2. Day-to-day policy for Zimbabwe should be the responsibility of a senior minister, not an inexperienced Under-Secretary of State. A special government committee should be set up to monitor the evolving crisis, ensure sanctions are enforced and hasten more serious action. The Defence, Foreign and Overseas Development Secretaries should sit on the committee and it should report to the Prime Minister.
3. Sanctions must be remorselessly pursued. They should also be extended to include two new categories. Firstly, the children of Zanu-PF ministers and allies of the regime who are being educated in private schools in the west should be sent home. Secondly, the powerful business backers of Mugabe who help keep him in power by providing foreign currency should be identified. The feeling of impunity that is prevalent among Mugabe's supporters must be undermined.
4. Fuel supplies in Zimbabwe are close to zero. There is barely any petrol in Harare. The country has little foreign currency to pay for new deliveries; recently, money intended for new supplies was instead used to pay debtors who had refused to send further supplies until arrears were paid. Every effort must be made to restrict any re-supply of oil.
5. Britain should be ready to use the International Convention Against Torture to arrest Mugabe's henchmen who travel outside the country.
6. South Africa could solve the problem. If President Mbeki understands that socio-economic collapse in Zimbabwe will destabilise South Africa, he would be more likely to cut off all support to Mugabe. The Prime Minister and other world leaders must therefore engage directly with President Mbeki.
7. In December 2002, the Prime Minister showed that he was ready to take the lead in the Middle East by calling for an international conference on Palestine. He should take a similar lead over Zimbabwe.
8. There is nothing racist about standing up for human rights and against torture, starvation and mass murder. Britain must ignore President Mugabe's anti-British rhetoric.
9. If Mugabe is determined to prevent food reaching sections of his own population, other ways must be found of feeding them. In November 2002, Mark Bellamy, a senior adviser at the US State Department, said that America was ready to take "very intrusive interventionist measures" to ensure that food aid was delivered. By speaking out, the State Department official has set an example that others should follow.
10. If, in the coming months, Mugabe continues to deliberately starve his own people, then the United Nations must give urgent consideration to intervening on the ground to prevent another African genocide. Failure to act would do irreparable damage to the UN's already battered reputation in Africa.
Peter Oborne
March 2003
Weird lighting
Corbyn was too nice to be PM
Missed you jezza
What a mess we are in right now under Boris 😬😬😬😬😬😬🤐
In 2017 he was seen as a man of principle.By 2019, the fact that he had been basically manipulated into agreeing to a 2nd vote was seen by some as going against the democratic "will of the people".
I still stick with the belief that you shouldnot leave the last say on a Brexit deal to government - parliament deal, it had to be put to the people, after a thorough honest presentation of agreed policies. All of that you could trust him to implement!
If by 'manipulated' you mean he abided by a democratic decision taken by labour members, then yes, he was 'manipulated'. I'll honestly never understand that rhetoric. The brexiteers knew they'd lost the argument, which is why they kept ironically invoking 'democracy' in order to prevent a democratic referendum. They knew that the first referendum had been won by lying and cheating, so tried to push the idiotic notion that once a democratic decision has been taken, it can't be democratically reversed!
Anyway its happened now. But yeah, people were duped by the media into seeing JC as an 'enemy of the people', merely because he believed in democracy. Tragic.
I never stood for insincerity or blatant lying!
Certainly Jimmy is not neither of those categories. I still trust him.
Don't worry folks, its all gonna work out fine now we got Sir Kier Blair and re-New Labour.
Ha ha - nope! 😁😏
and he still has his allotment
Who's Jeremy Corbyn ?????
Peter Oborne asked the wrong question about backing the May deal he should have asked his why did he not support the Johnson Accord?
We were hoodwinked by the media!
Nothing wrong with his views & opinions!
This is a great man.
If I could have imfluenced the decisions they made I would have said that Corbyn should have kept on arguing that democracy must guide their brexit policy.
I decent guy does not always come first, it is the nature of politics, it's verbal sparring and backstabbing with using real instruments.
May's deal was not 'soft Brexit', please stop repeating this lie
Peter Oborne is an unlikely ally.
He has pure heart ❤️ more respect for this man
How middle class and boring, working class freedom fighters smash the smug lefties
I think they should give him another go. Just a few more election losses and he will finally become Prime Minister. Maybe in 2045 or so. Most of his supporters would be happy with that plan, I am sure.
Who’ll be voting then after Johnson’s killed everyone off? How patriotic! 😂🤦🏽♂️
Translation: I'd rather believe the media and their interests than have a decent man in number 10.
@@M2Mil7er No, that is not a translation of what I said. In fact, both statements are in the same language. But by all means, go with Corbyn yet again. I am sure he can win an election THIS time!!! It is not as if he has a losing track record or anything. I have noticed that he seems pretty content now, as his main policy goal of Brexit has already taken place, he can rest easy again. Look at his record over the last 30 years. He is and always a was a Brexiteer, just without admitting it.
@@M2Mil7er Or here's a "translation" of your statement: "I believe in the cult of personality that is Cobyn. No matter what he does, no matter how badly he loses, no matter how inept he is, no matter how much he defies the will of his own party by backing Brexit, no matter how poor his skills with the media are, no matter how many elections he loses, I will back him! Even if he is dead, I will back him as the next Prime Minister!" You see, you can deny it all you want, and you will, but all facts show that Corbyn was the worst, most inept, most unelectable leader of Labour in nearly 100 years. He literally lost the election by a worse margin than anyone in 85 years, yet for his backers, there is always an excuse, always a new reason to back him, always some flimsy reason to deny reality. In this way they are as ignorant and blind as the Brexiteers. They support something no matter how much evidence shows it to be folly.
Jeremy Corbyn is the most honest and dignified person and politician. He has spent his life fighting for the impoverished, and the weak against the strong and powerful. He is the best prime minister we never had.
The first serious Socialist to lead the Labour Party in decades. Your dynamism and integrity scared the pants off them, Jeremy. That's why the establishment brought all the firepower they had to bear. And the way Antisemitism was weaponised disgusted me. I think it caused more reactionary antisemitism in the broader community, as well as a corresponding Islamophobia. It seems to me that after the seeming success of the whipped up xenophobia with regard to Brexit, the far right decided to use the same appalling tactics to damage you and their own chosen scapegoat, Muslims. That and all the pale blues in the party contributed to your downfall. Democratic participation within a political party? Who'd a thought it? I think that the majority of people, of all persuasions, were able to see what was happening, but us ordinary folk down here only have a vote to wield. The higher up decision makers ran scared when it hit the fan.
Well done but please .... don't use the intviewer style again it's horrible. You can literallly see the the UK outsourced material is the more qualitative one, therefor the composition of you interviewer contracts with the other person. good tip try complementary colors ....also your questions are being weakend via this visual style.
he was spoon-fed answers by an arse-licking interviewer!! LOL!!! though it is appropriate for a geriatric has-been who failed worse than any previous labour leader.
@@henrik5899 No, he became the most popular Labour leader by far, and why the Cons had to use their rich media owning friends to spread lies about him before the election, knowing the gullible would believe all they were fed. Easy. And look at the state of the country now.
You clearly haven't bothered listening to a word the man said in this interview.
@@bunnyhop3211 hahahaha - the greatest failure in history, and you can't see why. Perhaps when you grow up a little? maybe not
Should be pm
Yes. Jeremy was, and is, so totally right.
If Labour had voted in any *other* policy on Brexit, than the one that had been cleared at Labour Party Conference (which it was, so you can't blame Corbyn), they risked losing votes, and MPs, in London and the South-East. (And in Scotland, but I suppose it was thought then that there weren't any there further to lose! 😏)
But perhaps Labour should just *not* have made that pledge, about the second referendum?
If they hadn't been so frank about where they stood: if they were a bit vague about the issue - as are Boris Johnson's Tories, on most issues apart from Brexit - it would have given them more room to manoeuvre, and set less people against them. 😏
But Corbyn was fighting against a large section of his own party - and I don't mean grassroots Remainers! He had to concede to the Neoliberal right the main policy it wanted - and it lost Labour the election. Also I don't think these Blairites ever want to admit, how sick voters in general were of Blairite MPs, in the "safe seats" in question. Often they were "parachuted in" from outside these communities: *and they didn't bring these deprived areas any jobs* . The irony is, that Corbyn's Labour, once in power, would have!! 😏
Steptoes bollock 🤣
this isn't google image search mate.
@@M2Mil7er fair play you got me 😂
There was nothing wrong with his policies, it was his leadership
There was nothing wrong with his leadership, it was all due to pushback from the PLP and the media. If taking a more democratic style of leadership is a problem, that;s a condemnation of our political system, not of Corbyn.
@@monkeymox2544 Indeed. When autocratic leadership is to be more highly respected than democratic leadership, which is reviled and scorned, we have some serious problems within our system.
JC4PM.
Please clarify why many of the Labour Party wanted you out so badly. I know this happened at my CLP and your supporters were fighting a losing battle.
If you don;t know, you must be blind to racism and factionalism. Well spotted...not
@@henrik5899 So you say but he won two Peace prizes and there is no evidence of racism . His whole life has been dedicated to bringing Peace and there are many Jews who also back him. Just trumped up as they were scared he would stop corruption. You won't convince me as his track record is commendable unless you read the lies of the MURDOCH press.
@@henrik5899 to answer the original question, he wanted to get rid of second jobs for mp's. They were looking after their pockets while mongs like you lapped up the bullshit. Real sad. Real fucking sad.
Snouts in the trough. Since the revolving door was established between corporations, banks and government, being an MP has changed from being a service to the public to being a step on a career ladder that will net you rewards for services provided to the billionaire donor class.
Corbyn threatened to overturn the trough. The piggies saw their comfy future melting away and teamed up with the billionaire tax dodgers to take him down.
@@henrik5899 And our government backed and supplied weapons to islamic fundamentalist head choppers in Libya and Syria and is instructing our military to support and advise the Saudis in their illegal siege of Yemen, which has led to the deaths of 38,000 children, compared to the total death toll of just over 6000 in the Northern Ireland troubles.
In terms of supporting terrorists, the Conservative Party have been responsible for far more deaths of innocent people than Corbyn.
He was stabbed in the back by we know what group? Where have we heard that before?
@@thesilentguy61 Nazis.
I wanted to give starmer a chance but I think it was the last strew last week when war criminal blair said he backs starmer, , all the blairites and the right of the labour party do and some tories, george galloway called this month's ago
I voted for Jeremy Corbyn to be leader of the Labour Party and then for PM, and I have to say I feel fucking sick that we voted in a philandering clown and his cronies instead.
I dont think Corbyn had the leadership skillset...he was no butcher..this is politics, apart from hilary benn who did he sack..or deselect../
So sorry mr Corbyn was not listen too, hope the country reflect and learn , johnson is very poor .
Bit of a harsh start to an interview wasn't it, asking him to name some of his achievements?
"Well I alienated a fair chunk of traditional Labour voters, I failed to overcome a truly pathetic Tory party who were lead by a bunch of imbeciles, I did very little to end the claims of widespread antisemitism within the Labour Party and I offered a completely nonsensical Brexit strategy. But on the positives I did offer everyone free broadband, I promised to plant more trees than any other party and I kept Dianne Abbott in employment which I'm sure you'll all agree is an achievement in itself"
He really should be proud of himself.
His biggest mistake was Diane Abbott
Three very posh old guys debating in their own very posh way.
If you weren't so dumb you might have learned something
Corbyn came across as a genuine guy but wrong on so many things and with absolutely no contrition regarding his actions. Oh! and Cv19 crisis management isn't a vindication. I guess Corbyn, Labour and myself as a former Labour voter are still going through a grieving process.
You're not a labour voter for shit
@@tweetsalways7068 Do you bother to read? I did say " *as a former* Labour voter." To elaborate further I've voted Labour since 83 (Foot: Leave the EEC and ban the bomb) up until Corbyn (Remain). So in one sense you are correct but in another wrong as I'm old working class Labour. Not your virtue signalling, PC, SJW, champagne Marxist Socialist.
Until Labour get's it's *SHIT* together you can keep your far left protest party for all I care
@@nolelox you'll know what it says on the back of the card then? Or do you just repeat #ScumMedia nonsense?
@@darrylbradshaw216 You're another idiot that doesn't bother to read. I said I voted Labour. I didn't say I was a voting member. It's not a wonder us working class voters feel abandoned, you lot don't friggin listen. We the electorate have been asking labour to listen for years and when you get the biggest kicking since 1935 because you didn't listen, you still don't listen.
Don't forget your blankie for when you meet the real world.
I hope you vote with us next time. My generation is worse off than my parent's generation and I don't plan on failing the next generation in the same way.
As far as the SJW, PC virtue signalling goes I would suggest you not let that bother you as much, I just see it at as the world changing, if Corbyn hand't sparked it something else would have.
The Labour Party is out of touch with British working and middle class people and thus has lost four general elections in a row. Labour is anti-semitic, anti-American and unpatriotic and supports Hezbollah and Hamas and it probably will never again form a British government. There is also serious concern over Labour’s ability to effectively manage the government and the economy.
Tories are , fill in the blanks.....
what dude geve corbyn the numbers about gaza ? or is he complete delusional...now you understand why he is unfit
if you stop a moment and think what he is claiming...gaza=poverty=occupastion=oppression=an open air prison...but the best universety's and the most learned ppl,,,,haha
If your mozafaka Zionist evil
Utta crap!!
RichieD Official well it’s beyond your intellectual ability to understand
That was like a fox news interview to a republican, so soft ball I can't take it seriously.
Why tf would they go in hard since he’s no longer loto? 😂🤦🏽♂️
He has no humanity about him at all
"Nurse. I was nearly a Prime Minister you know?"
"Really Jeremy? Here's your night medication. Take this and let's get you off to bed."
"Nurse! I was nearly a Prime Minister you know?"