HMS Richmond conducts Replenishment at Sea with RFA Tidesurge

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 бер 2022
  • HMS_Richmond conducts Replenishment at Sea on the way to NATO exercise Cold Response being held off Norway.
    Via: HMS Richmond.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @josephlezano7691
    @josephlezano7691 2 роки тому +6

    Admirable . Well done 👍
    With Best Wishes.
    British Gibraltar UK Overseas Territory 🇬🇧

  • @montyzumazoom1337
    @montyzumazoom1337 2 роки тому +6

    Always impressive to see.

  • @petersellers9219
    @petersellers9219 2 роки тому +3

    GrEaT to see women taking the jobs of men in this really important work for our nation.

  • @charlestellis7021
    @charlestellis7021 2 роки тому +2

    Experienced many of these during my career.

  • @ThatCarGuy
    @ThatCarGuy 2 роки тому +10

    Hope to see the UK get nuclear carriers that can do the same job, allowing for longer mission times and less ships to protect while also being able to free up supply ships to help other ships not in the CSG.
    "The ships normally carries enough food and supplies to operate for 90 days. Four distilling units enable NIMITZ-class engineers to make over 400,000 gallons of fresh water from seawater a day, for use by the propulsion plants, catapults and crew. The ship carries approximately 3 million gallons of fuel for her aircraft and escorts, and enough weapons and stores for extended operations without replenishment."

    • @Durgesuth
      @Durgesuth 2 роки тому +7

      Never understood why U.K. didn’t make these carriers nuclear propulsion as the U.K. is a world leader with its submarine nuclear propulsion…

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 2 роки тому +6

      @@Durgesuth nor do I especially when submarine reactors are much harder to build do to confined spaces.

    • @internetenjoyer1044
      @internetenjoyer1044 2 роки тому

      the cost benefit doesnt work out. nuclear carriers are useful and a nice to hve but with out budget its not worth doubling the price of the carriers

    • @handyman991
      @handyman991 2 роки тому +4

      @@Durgesuth Apparently some ports dont alow nuclear powerd vessels to dock and we got 2 for the price of 1 over nuclear. also the 25yr lifespan is an issue with nuclear especialy if you sell them on like HMS Ocean. Its easier to re-build than refuel or de-comission a nuclear vessel . There are lots of other reasons and obviously they did the pros & cons thing before production but the main points are coverd above.

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 2 роки тому +6

      ​@@handyman991 99 percent of the worlds ports allow nuclear carriers, sources below. There is no issue with decommissioning reactors, it's been done for awhile now. It's not easier to rebuild a reactor/ship then to refuel a reactor.
      Australia allows them.
      "tourism Minister, Mark McGowan today welcomed more than 5,000 senior officers and crew aboard USS NIMITZ (CVN-68) to Western Australia."
      Italy? They allow them...
      "For years a dozen Italian seaports have been decrying the risks they run as bases for nuclear powered or nuclear armed U.S. warships (submarines, aircraft carriers): Augusta, Brindisi, Cagliari, Castellammare di Stabia, Gaeta, La Maddalena, La Spezia, Livorno, Napoli, Taranto, Trieste, Venezia."
      Germany? The UK? France?
      "Nimitz conducted her second abnormally dangerous navigational detail of the deployment as she transited the English Channel (with its high volume of shipping) en route from Wilhelmshaven, West Germany, to Brest, France."
      Japan?
      "Ronald Reagan made five deployments to the Pacific and Middle East between 2006 and 2011 while based at Naval Air Station North Island. In October 2015, Ronald Reagan replaced USS George Washington as the flagship of Carrier Strike Group Five, the only forward-based carrier strike group home-ported at Yokosuka, Japan, as part of the United States Seventh Fleet"
      South Korea?
      "U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Michael D. White, the commander of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 11 and Rear Adm. William McQuilkin, the commander of U.S. Naval Forces Korea, pose with local dignitaries aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) in Busan, "
      India?
      "The carrier departed North Island for its thirteenth deployment on 2 April 2007 to the Arabian Sea, relieving USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in support of OIF. It anchored off Chennai, India on 2 July 2007 as part of efforts to expand bilateral defense cooperation between India and the United States."
      USS Nimitz transition Suez Canal.
      ua-cam.com/video/W_HOjxu8nB8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=U.S.Navy
      25-29 May 1991: Nimitz anchored at Dubai
      11-12 Mar 1993: Nimitz sailed through the Strait of Malacca
      18 Jun 1993: Nimitz sailed outbound through the Strait of Hormuz into the Arabian Sea
      13-14 Feb 1998: Nimitz anchored off Port Suez, Egypt, and passed through the Suez Canal
      21-23 Apr 1985: Nimitz anchored in Augusta Bay, Sicily, to turn over to Dwight D. Eisenhower.
      31 Dec 1988-6 Jan 1989: Nimitz anchored at Singapore , affording her crew their first port of call after 71 punishing days at sea.

  • @L2ggs
    @L2ggs 2 роки тому +2

    Well done squires. keep fighting

  • @simonbird1973
    @simonbird1973 2 роки тому +2

    Have they fixed the vibrations from the exhausts on the tide class that made multiple accommodations uninhabitable?

  • @teresaponziani161
    @teresaponziani161 2 роки тому +1

    Yes, very impressive to see! Stay safe. God bless!

  • @turkeyisnotineurope8123
    @turkeyisnotineurope8123 2 роки тому +1

    Another Dunkirk Style ?