none of this matters to me, all that matters is the historical albanian empire where albania owned the world before giving their land to other nations out of their kindness
I swear this is so true. They got rid of Belarus's formable (Arguably one of the Hardest nation to play in EU) Ruthenia. It doesnt make any sense how broken some of these formables are and how stupid some of them are.
NOOOO!!!!! YOU DONT GET IT!!!!! EVEN THOUGH THIS GAME IS EXTREMELY UNREALISTIC AND ITS WHOLE PURPOSE IS TO CREATE ALT-HISTROY, WE STILL HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE HECKIN’ WHOLESOME HISTORICAL ACCURACY!!!!!!!!
5:39 actually, it was real! While it was a Polish-Lithuanian Client State, it made attempts to colonise both Trinidad and Gambia, although ultimately failed, so there IS historical precedent Nice video
I quit when they removed Dahomey. What kills the game for me is the updates that nerf minor countries; For example you now have to build shipyards to build ships, a smaller country may not have the funds to build a shipyard (multiple levels) and then ships on top of that. The game has become too unbalanced for me and I won't be returning anytime soon.
@Zynth301 that or Kaliningrad, heck forming Prussia would be a hard one for Brandenburg since currently they only had Potsdam and Cottbus as their potential cities
5:45 courland was a nation based in the Poland-Lithuania,the colonies of gambia and trinidad are indeed historical,there have been numerous attempts of colonizing those two nations.
I mean part of the formables are fictional so idk why he can’t add „fictional formables” or „unrealistic formables” since he literally adds them in game like Franco British union that was just a concept
i'd say, add formables for formables. Say if i formed byzantium, then i would get a decision to form rome too (if i counquered the land) that could also go to any roman "sucsessors" like the russian empire, the ottomans, the hre, and napoleonic france.
Custom Formables? basically they could add custom formables for private servers, giving private server owners more free reign on stuff, and giving them access to what can be formed in the server they're in, with a new tab in the formables box. An example of this would be: Yunnan Clique forming the Tang Dynasty if somebody was doing a Kaiserredux World. Or another would be the United Nations, etc etc etc. point being, it'd only be in private servers, and there'd be a whole new thing for the custom formables within said server, as it'd be different in every server.
Courland's colonies were actually real,they had colonies both in the gambia and tobago,it was a failure in the end though So Poland-Lithuania technically by proxy had some small colonies due to its vassal for atleast a bit of time
A suggestion of formable for Greenland: The Inuit league. To make this formable you must unite the lands where the inuit peoples live. Buffs: provides +5% stability and 10% political power gain. Can form: This formable could incentive players to play as Greenland. Can form: Greenland, Nunavut, Northwest. Required to form: Greenland, Nunavut (Canada), Northwest (Canada).
Like your idea about having an early, mid, and lategame formable for every or almost every country. I don't agree with moving a capital giving you the formables of other countries, I feel like that is way too abusable and not fun given the alternatives. I would suggest a formable allowance system, which is already in the game. If a country is France, it gets French formables. Just expand that; if a country is Greece, one of its formables is Byzantine Empire --> When Greece forms Byzantine Empire, it can now re-form the Roman Empire, perhaps with a slightly altered flag, and gets a national mission to expand the Byzantine Empire to its territorial zenith (including Italy and North Africa), which would perhaps come first and be considered a midgame formable. That would allow many countries to unlock their mid-game formable instead of avoiding it, and it can be related to their early-game formable. Examples of these progressions of starting country to early to mid to late formables where each stage is unlocked are Greece > Byzantine > Maxed out Byzantine > Roman Empire, Italy > Italian Empire > Unite Mare Nostrum (What Mussolini dreamed of Italy to be, including parts of France and most of the rest of the Mediterranean Coast > Roman Empire, Britain > Angevin > First British Empire (The one with the thirteen colonies) > British Empire, Saudi Arabia > Emirate of Dirayah > Arab League > Islamic Caliphate (Expanded to include all muslim territories everywhere, like Indonesia and the top half of Africa. Some paths would be specific to certain countries but could lead to the same end goal. Of course, this can't be applied to every country. I have no idea what to do with something like South Africa for a midgame formable. Also, in the short term, I would like to see the NAU expanded to include all of North America (Carribean is optional), giving USA players a check in the form of stability, because they would lose 20+ stab forming NAU as opposed to just six.
Courland and Livonia was an actual thing although it wasnt estonia and latvia but a lower part of latvia that was a puppet of poland, they had Trinidad and a port in gambia before they sold trinidad to spain and the port to the british. Its really interesting I reccomend checking it out, I probably messed up and said something wrong so search it up.
The americas have so much potential for formables, for example mexico could form either the first mexican empire or the viceroyalty of new spain, but like russia you can only form one of the two and not the other.
Adding to modifiers they should literally add time periods gameplay, like if you would want to start from 1444 or Napoleonic times and etc.. So that it changes the gameplay itself for more replayability [examples are like the huge use of artillery in the napoleonic times, or a new unit like the cavalry in the roman times] this can make us play more since it gives unique formables, nations, units, troops, DOCTRINES, IDEOLOGIES, and so on and so forth. It literally changes the gameplay completely but with the same base... This would make the game 200 more popular, since literally 80% of the good events in ron private are already 1444 event, napoleonic times etc...
And even changing modern times into a different focus of the game would be better, like germany in 2024 invading poland is not realistic, make the focus different.. Maybe more about diplomacy and economics than just tank spamming..? And of course a huge world event like WW3, WW2, WW1 which are enforced to take part in if not you didn't do tasks/policies.
I like the last idea but I suggest we create formables for formables. Like you can form Third Rome as Russia once you make the Russian empire and then take Constantinople and Rome. You can form Eurasian Union when you form the Soviet Union or the European Union.
I think the problem with going with historical formables has always been that there’s only so long of a list before you run out of options. However, I once made a fake formable disguised as a real one, and got like 80 likes before it was discovered, because the land requirements were fair and it would’ve given a formable to a nation that had very few.
Really good video, agree with everything you said, when I was forming the mongol empire, I was so confused about the modifiers because you have to defeat china, defeat japan and then defeat russia and THEN defeat the balkans but all you get Is a modifier worse than the swedish empire?
Antarctica needs a formable called the Penguin Empire. It would consist of all the lands penguin inhabit, ignoring sub-species. It could also give the Penguin Emperor title alongside unit skins.
The last point is kinda silly, for example, the Antarctica one, but I do agree with how more people who were under said empire should be able to form it
the last suggestion could be heavly abused, like china forming the mongol empire, UK forming the frankish empire and the USA forming the EU. Also, for that to happen the capital change sistem would probably have to be reworked, which would take hyperant another 2 years
they removed the fun formables like South american union, guyana fedaration (funny) and more regionals, aswell as like thrace or zaire bc of historical accuracy, this game is made for fun and giggles so it makes me so mad that thet removed them
R.I.P fictional former balls. It's so sad fictional formables gets removed, and I do agree with you, I think fictional formables would change it up a bit instead of modern country go back to the past. Obviously redicious ones like "Greater Greece" which is just Greece but bigger shouldn't be accepted, but the unique ones like Alpine Republic or Kingdom of Kandy should just stay. Also you forgot to mention how dead the Oceania side of Rise Of Nations is, they had to remove the Oceania formables, at least there's Tongan Empire. RIP Kingdom of Fiji. The formables could've at least be the last interesting left in Oceania, like imagine a mission for some island nations where you take land just to be prepared for rising sea levels and you get a support from the people for trying to save the people from the rising sea levels. Okay maybe to far, but Oceania in general not much interesting on the war side. Also that idea you had at the end of moving capitals then forming whatever, could be interesting but questionable. It's definitely a fun challenge tho but not too sure on it because what if then the original country breaks free, like antarctica to paris but part of france still remains alive after declaring independence. Or what if whenever Hyperant adds focus trees, some formables (especially the overpowered ones) are locked behind a focus tree, like NAU needing a specific path of the focus tree, to be able to form NAU, so you don't get pre 2020 NAU. Also the formables modifier makes it hard for rise of nations to be a subjective game, pls rebalance. Anyways time to give one minute of silence for my favourite removed formables: German Reich (classic) Filipino Empire (That flag is cool) Alpine Republic (I didn't realise this was removed) United States of South America (Hyperant removed this continent formable but not EU, African Union or NAU) And Frankish Empire's 2019 flag... Nevermind that still bleaches my eyes I'm glad they changed it.
My suggestion was mainly a reaction to the rule that you can't release more than 1 formable. Honestly, the best way would be to add a culture system so that you have to integrate every land you conquer into your own and then change it into what you desire, doing so would make you be able to change nation but would also come at some cost like maybe lowering stability, war exhaustion and unrest since y'know, changing the culture to french when you're all swedish might not be so popular within your country. When you have 100% of a certain culture you can change nation.
@@Amandos Culture so diverse when you start conquering and to get 100% of the certain culture you might have to start a geno- I mean normalise their culture =)
I remember that there was a proposal to add a formable called "Minjok" it would have required you to take a lot of East Asia as North Korea, that would have been fun to do but sadly they discarded the idea.
Tbf, there isn't much potential with the Koreas when it comes to formables. Korea never really expanded that much outside the Korean peninsula throughout its history or almost did so. I reckon NK having Goguryeo is fine enough. And tbh, they could have come up with a better name than "Minjok". That literally just means "ethnic group" in Korean.
I hate how the formables have weird city choices. Like the Ottoman Empire doesn’t have their North Africa territory or Austrian Empire having all of Romania instead or just Transylvania
i mean, NAU its kinda understandable since its not a us exclusive formable since canada and mexico can form it too, also the fact that if either a canada player or a mexico placer that are at least decent in the game enter usa basically have it 100 times harder to form the nau since canada can go winter defence and mexico can just go mountain defense thats even more op than winter defense + mexico has a really good early formable thats the mexican empire thats basically made to fight with the us, with 15% infantery defence, and on top of that 20% city resistance meaning that any battle on a mexico city its suicide, specially if the mexico player specializes on jungle or mountains, lets remember it has desert to so its a hudge F U to any us player to invade if we consider that nobody creates separate army specialized at early game unless you can guess it, they are going for defence and are not going to move those troops
Bro swiz doesn't need any formables, they are the final boss of Europe, when the fires stop and the blitzkrieging germans fall, switz remains, and this is coming from a south africa main
Seeing this video made me think for 3 formables for my country, Chile Chilean Kingdom: Own all port cities of South America or Own all port cities in american pacific coast (from Alaska to Peru) Chilean Empire: Own all port cities in the pacific ocean Coastline Union: Own the whole world's port cities
1:47 I'm going to be honest, I haven't finished the video. But the NAU is way too easy, and it pisses me off. North America isn't just Canada, U.S.A, and Mexico. It's Central America and the Caribbean. So bringing back the old NAU flag, and modifying the requirements to include as I stated Central America and the Caribbean. Cause, the current NAU is already what the U.S.A is going to invade either way, and just lets the rest rot away. Anyways, rant over 😎😎 Edit: gonna watch the rest 👍
always love it when i'm playing japan and while just trying my best to increase my stability, the US already done NAU and ready to spank my ass with a thousand BB
it would be so fun if hyperant just said fuck it and gave every country 5 formables and didnt give a fuck about historical accuracy. just imagine being brazil, forming united states of south america and getting cores in all of south america. or the equatorial empire requiring all the countries in the equator
10:39 Stupid Idea, people would get for example China, Capture Taiwan, move their capital to Taipei and say "oh wow guess I formed RoC fair and square"
I don't want inhistorical formables, it's annoying and I'm a stupid nerd. But please update modifiers man benelux gets NOTHING. Also why did they remove kingdom of Jerusalem for Cyprus?
Bro once you got that you would become literal uninvadeable unless you frick up massively or the enemy just house mountains on mountains of units/nukes
They need to update formables
He hasn't touched formables in a year...
@@Amandoshe hasn’t touched the game itself in a year 😂
@@Amandoshe hasn’t been on youtube or roblox in a year
Don’t get your hopes up
@@e123-o3y He hasnt touched anyone in a year
none of this matters to me, all that matters is the historical albanian empire where albania owned the world before giving their land to other nations out of their kindness
lol same with estonia but estonia got the world first.
@@Eesti12345 albania got it first, we gave estonia independence because we are kind people
@@Trunehbut why do we not have anyone talking about it in estonia? also hello truneh
yes i agree
Then Traitor Serbia erased Albanian history, claimed the world and said that they did it.
I swear this is so true. They got rid of Belarus's formable (Arguably one of the Hardest nation to play in EU) Ruthenia. It doesnt make any sense how broken some of these formables are and how stupid some of them are.
It pisses me off so much because I spent an entire day trying to form it. I finally succeeded just for it to be removed
@@piercecowley255 i mean its not that hard of a formable i looked it up you only need poland and ukraine?
@thechows324 yh i was very bad and germany kept invading parts of poland
@@thechows324 germany and russia to contend with from the start
Bro another formsble they removed was Nazi germany i mean if they didnt ever remove it you could do a ww2 roleplay
I remember when they removed a United South America because “it was unrealistic” 💀💀
Me being able taking over the world as Burundi in Ron, but not able to unite South America as a farmable due to realism:
and then nau is still there 😂
NOOOO!!!!! YOU DONT GET IT!!!!! EVEN THOUGH THIS GAME IS EXTREMELY UNREALISTIC AND ITS WHOLE PURPOSE IS TO CREATE ALT-HISTROY, WE STILL HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE HECKIN’ WHOLESOME HISTORICAL ACCURACY!!!!!!!!
@@noonelaughed6598BUT WE NEED ALTERNATE HISTORY TOOOOOOOOOO
I'm new to game and I was thinking about making this formable
5:39 actually, it was real! While it was a Polish-Lithuanian Client State, it made attempts to colonise both Trinidad and Gambia, although ultimately failed, so there IS historical precedent
Nice video
They actually colonized it but for a short time since waging with russia and sweden made it imposible to maintain
That’s courland.
Crazy how he wants to remove ASEAN for being too "regional", but not the NAU
thats weird considering that asean is actually a thing but not NAU (from what i know of)
@@BritishBallEditing yes asean is a kinda of alliance
@@thechows324it’s a economic union like the European Union
I quit when they removed Dahomey. What kills the game for me is the updates that nerf minor countries; For example you now have to build shipyards to build ships, a smaller country may not have the funds to build a shipyard (multiple levels) and then ships on top of that. The game has become too unbalanced for me and I won't be returning anytime soon.
I seriously wonder why formables like NAU are still here while South American Union was removed 😭
I want back the SAU but to be fair, it would make Brazil unstoppable
0:40 This is set-up and fake, no rise of nations player has a girlfriend in the first place
Some do, just wheter they can talk about them is the difficult part.
i want Prussia and Weimar Republic to be added, idc how unrealistic that looks
BRO SAMEEEE
and prussia could be formed by a brandenburg releasable
@Zynth301 that or Kaliningrad, heck forming Prussia would be a hard one for Brandenburg since currently they only had Potsdam and Cottbus as their potential cities
It could be a formable for kalingraf
@fel8xcraft exactly, but they said its unrealistic
5:45 courland was a nation based in the Poland-Lithuania,the colonies of gambia and trinidad are indeed historical,there have been numerous attempts of colonizing those two nations.
Sometimes I just wish I could abduct Hyperant to my basement and force him to actually work on the game.
extreme problems.. extreme measures.
@@mastervorn3220 Sometimes modern problems require medieval solutions.
coulda force him to teach how RON works too, just to help updating the game
@@BlazingFlame69 my respect for you has gone up my good sir.
I mean part of the formables are fictional so idk why he can’t add „fictional formables” or „unrealistic formables” since he literally adds them in game like Franco British union that was just a concept
I wish they’d add The United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway
i'd say, add formables for formables. Say if i formed byzantium, then i would get a decision to form rome too (if i counquered the land) that could also go to any roman "sucsessors" like the russian empire, the ottomans, the hre, and napoleonic france.
yeah, formables being a end tag every time is bad design. Paradox games figured that out a decade ago but this dev somehow doesnt.
@@astillia6073 well a whole AAA game studio is of course gonna figure out problems faster than 1 roblox developer
@@crafterrium8724 The guy who made Age of History did the same thing as well back in 2018. This dude is just lazy.
@@NotFunctional-ever whats that
this was suggested in the discord but we still waiting for hyperant
i agree that unrealistic formables are fine but any country being able to form any formable is just insanely dumb idea
Stopped doing formables when they removed them constantly
Custom Formables? basically they could add custom formables for private servers, giving private server owners more free reign on stuff, and giving them access to what can be formed in the server they're in, with a new tab in the formables box. An example of this would be: Yunnan Clique forming the Tang Dynasty if somebody was doing a Kaiserredux World. Or another would be the United Nations, etc etc etc. point being, it'd only be in private servers, and there'd be a whole new thing for the custom formables within said server, as it'd be different in every server.
Alpine republic was a OG formable and cool 😢
Courland's colonies were actually real,they had colonies both in the gambia and tobago,it was a failure in the end though
So Poland-Lithuania technically by proxy had some small colonies due to its vassal for atleast a bit of time
A suggestion of formable for Greenland: The Inuit league.
To make this formable you must unite the lands where the inuit peoples live.
Buffs: provides +5% stability and 10%
political power gain.
Can form:
This formable could incentive players to play as Greenland.
Can form: Greenland, Nunavut, Northwest.
Required to form: Greenland, Nunavut (Canada), Northwest (Canada).
Bro this update was so annoying because they removed Nazi Germany so you couldn’t do ww2 simulations
Roblox threatened to ban it if they didn't remove NAZI Germany
Petition zu retzurn das Reich to das gäme?
The vibration part got me. Now i need some proof buddy
The hell is Hyperant doing irl that’s so important that he forgot about his own game
dying
Living
Developing other games
@@x-fun3149 true but his other games are smaller then ron😭
truly a rise of critical status moment
Like your idea about having an early, mid, and lategame formable for every or almost every country. I don't agree with moving a capital giving you the formables of other countries, I feel like that is way too abusable and not fun given the alternatives. I would suggest a formable allowance system, which is already in the game. If a country is France, it gets French formables. Just expand that; if a country is Greece, one of its formables is Byzantine Empire --> When Greece forms Byzantine Empire, it can now re-form the Roman Empire, perhaps with a slightly altered flag, and gets a national mission to expand the Byzantine Empire to its territorial zenith (including Italy and North Africa), which would perhaps come first and be considered a midgame formable. That would allow many countries to unlock their mid-game formable instead of avoiding it, and it can be related to their early-game formable. Examples of these progressions of starting country to early to mid to late formables where each stage is unlocked are Greece > Byzantine > Maxed out Byzantine > Roman Empire, Italy > Italian Empire > Unite Mare Nostrum (What Mussolini dreamed of Italy to be, including parts of France and most of the rest of the Mediterranean Coast > Roman Empire, Britain > Angevin > First British Empire (The one with the thirteen colonies) > British Empire, Saudi Arabia > Emirate of Dirayah > Arab League > Islamic Caliphate (Expanded to include all muslim territories everywhere, like Indonesia and the top half of Africa. Some paths would be specific to certain countries but could lead to the same end goal. Of course, this can't be applied to every country. I have no idea what to do with something like South Africa for a midgame formable. Also, in the short term, I would like to see the NAU expanded to include all of North America (Carribean is optional), giving USA players a check in the form of stability, because they would lose 20+ stab forming NAU as opposed to just six.
I would love for them to add another German formidable, the one that has France, the Balkans, Denmark, and part of Russia
also with benelux, norway, poland, czech, austria, slovakia.
it was formed in real life
@@lye-kf2ho most of them were
I'm definitely subscribing now!
Upload a video instead!
Katesify spotted
omg you're still alive?
Ayo
Courland and Livonia was an actual thing although it wasnt estonia and latvia but a lower part of latvia that was a puppet of poland, they had Trinidad and a port in gambia before they sold trinidad to spain and the port to the british. Its really interesting I reccomend checking it out, I probably messed up and said something wrong so search it up.
the deal made me actually subscribe, I hope my kindness was pleasent!
The americas have so much potential for formables, for example mexico could form either the first mexican empire or the viceroyalty of new spain, but like russia you can only form one of the two and not the other.
i hated that USSA was removed, it was actually something you could form if you wanted to, it also offered a meaning to actually fight brazil.
I subscribed, You will feel my presence
Adding to modifiers they should literally add time periods gameplay, like if you would want to start from 1444 or Napoleonic times and etc.. So that it changes the gameplay itself for more replayability [examples are like the huge use of artillery in the napoleonic times, or a new unit like the cavalry in the roman times] this can make us play more since it gives unique formables, nations, units, troops, DOCTRINES, IDEOLOGIES, and so on and so forth. It literally changes the gameplay completely but with the same base... This would make the game 200 more popular, since literally 80% of the good events in ron private are already 1444 event, napoleonic times etc...
And even changing modern times into a different focus of the game would be better, like germany in 2024 invading poland is not realistic, make the focus different.. Maybe more about diplomacy and economics than just tank spamming..? And of course a huge world event like WW3, WW2, WW1 which are enforced to take part in if not you didn't do tasks/policies.
I will never forgive Hyperant removing United States of South America
I like the last idea but I suggest we create formables for formables. Like you can form Third Rome as Russia once you make the Russian empire and then take Constantinople and Rome. You can form Eurasian Union when you form the Soviet Union or the European Union.
hyperant needs to add different maps so we dont only start in 2019
Nice video I'm just gonna binge watch ron content or play ron cuz I'm sick lol
I think the problem with going with historical formables has always been that there’s only so long of a list before you run out of options.
However, I once made a fake formable disguised as a real one, and got like 80 likes before it was discovered, because the land requirements were fair and it would’ve given a formable to a nation that had very few.
Really good video, agree with everything you said, when I was forming the mongol empire, I was so confused about the modifiers because you have to defeat china, defeat japan and then defeat russia and THEN defeat the balkans but all you get Is a modifier worse than the swedish empire?
Antarctica needs a formable called the Penguin Empire. It would consist of all the lands penguin inhabit, ignoring sub-species. It could also give the Penguin Emperor title alongside unit skins.
He’s speaking facts
Thank you kind sir, I can now survive here in my basement for a few more days
The last point is kinda silly, for example, the Antarctica one, but I do agree with how more people who were under said empire should be able to form it
the last suggestion could be heavly abused, like china forming the mongol empire, UK forming the frankish empire and the USA forming the EU.
Also, for that to happen the capital change sistem would probably have to be reworked, which would take hyperant another 2 years
Yeah but how do you move ur capital if it can't be more then 750 km away
they removed the fun formables like South american union, guyana fedaration (funny) and more regionals, aswell as like thrace or zaire bc of historical accuracy, this game is made for fun and giggles so it makes me so mad that thet removed them
R.I.P fictional former balls.
It's so sad fictional formables gets removed, and I do agree with you, I think fictional formables would change it up a bit instead of modern country go back to the past. Obviously redicious ones like "Greater Greece" which is just Greece but bigger shouldn't be accepted, but the unique ones like Alpine Republic or Kingdom of Kandy should just stay.
Also you forgot to mention how dead the Oceania side of Rise Of Nations is, they had to remove the Oceania formables, at least there's Tongan Empire. RIP Kingdom of Fiji. The formables could've at least be the last interesting left in Oceania, like imagine a mission for some island nations where you take land just to be prepared for rising sea levels and you get a support from the people for trying to save the people from the rising sea levels. Okay maybe to far, but Oceania in general not much interesting on the war side.
Also that idea you had at the end of moving capitals then forming whatever, could be interesting but questionable. It's definitely a fun challenge tho but not too sure on it because what if then the original country breaks free, like antarctica to paris but part of france still remains alive after declaring independence.
Or what if whenever Hyperant adds focus trees, some formables (especially the overpowered ones) are locked behind a focus tree, like NAU needing a specific path of the focus tree, to be able to form NAU, so you don't get pre 2020 NAU.
Also the formables modifier makes it hard for rise of nations to be a subjective game, pls rebalance.
Anyways time to give one minute of silence for my favourite removed formables:
German Reich (classic)
Filipino Empire (That flag is cool)
Alpine Republic (I didn't realise this was removed)
United States of South America (Hyperant removed this continent formable but not EU, African Union or NAU)
And Frankish Empire's 2019 flag... Nevermind that still bleaches my eyes I'm glad they changed it.
My suggestion was mainly a reaction to the rule that you can't release more than 1 formable. Honestly, the best way would be to add a culture system so that you have to integrate every land you conquer into your own and then change it into what you desire, doing so would make you be able to change nation but would also come at some cost like maybe lowering stability, war exhaustion and unrest since y'know, changing the culture to french when you're all swedish might not be so popular within your country. When you have 100% of a certain culture you can change nation.
@@Amandos Culture so diverse when you start conquering and to get 100% of the certain culture you might have to start a geno- I mean normalise their culture =)
Why the beef with Greece again have they not been bullied enough yet?
I remember that there was a proposal to add a formable called "Minjok" it would have required you to take a lot of East Asia as North Korea, that would have been fun to do but sadly they discarded the idea.
Tbf, there isn't much potential with the Koreas when it comes to formables. Korea never really expanded that much outside the Korean peninsula throughout its history or almost did so. I reckon NK having Goguryeo is fine enough.
And tbh, they could have come up with a better name than "Minjok". That literally just means "ethnic group" in Korean.
We Love Rise of Nations I subbed for the first time I saw u
I hate how the formables have weird city choices. Like the Ottoman Empire doesn’t have their North Africa territory or Austrian Empire having all of Romania instead or just Transylvania
United states of South america need to be added back
They should add more formable like in hearts of iron 4 the harder the formable the better the buffs
it's sad how hyperant has abandoned the game
As a person who comes from Sri Lanka.
Im sad that Kandy is planned to be removed. But i understand.
i mean, NAU its kinda understandable since its not a us exclusive formable since canada and mexico can form it too, also the fact that if either a canada player or a mexico placer that are at least decent in the game enter usa basically have it 100 times harder to form the nau since canada can go winter defence and mexico can just go mountain defense thats even more op than winter defense + mexico has a really good early formable thats the mexican empire thats basically made to fight with the us, with 15% infantery defence, and on top of that 20% city resistance meaning that any battle on a mexico city its suicide, specially if the mexico player specializes on jungle or mountains, lets remember it has desert to so its a hudge F U to any us player to invade if we consider that nobody creates separate army specialized at early game unless you can guess it, they are going for defence and are not going to move those troops
Bro swiz doesn't need any formables, they are the final boss of Europe, when the fires stop and the blitzkrieging germans fall, switz remains, and this is coming from a south africa main
I really think it was stupid how hyperant removed the South American Union but kept stuff like Intermarium and like you mentioned North American Union
The Intermarium wasn't fictional. It was an actual idea by Piłsudski, and the Intermarium was one of the main reasons for the Soviet-Polish war.
I subscribe, feel my kindness ;)
Why are they removing unrealistic formables when one of the selling points of games like this is alternate history??
Seeing this video made me think for 3 formables for my country, Chile
Chilean Kingdom: Own all port cities of South America or Own all port cities in american pacific coast (from Alaska to Peru)
Chilean Empire: Own all port cities in the pacific ocean
Coastline Union: Own the whole world's port cities
5:49 Btw Courland-Livonia was a real country and did had a colony in Trinadad, however im not sure about Senegal.
Paradox: Oh boy, do I have the game for you
You convinced me at 1:07 Mr Amandus
1:47
I'm going to be honest, I haven't finished the video. But the NAU is way too easy, and it pisses me off. North America isn't just Canada, U.S.A, and Mexico. It's Central America and the Caribbean. So bringing back the old NAU flag, and modifying the requirements to include as I stated Central America and the Caribbean. Cause, the current NAU is already what the U.S.A is going to invade either way, and just lets the rest rot away. Anyways, rant over 😎😎
Edit: gonna watch the rest 👍
Agreed I mean hell if they are going have it be called North American union it should include all of North America
always love it when i'm playing japan and while just trying my best to increase my stability, the US already done NAU and ready to spank my ass with a thousand BB
Hyperant ur other games are ded just work ron
I am probably the only reason why you formed the Angevin Empire more than 2 times.
Another day, another video with persona 5 soundtracks
What is your opinion on Art of Diplomacy?
Why would you reforme an old empire when you can create a new one?
In Conquer Europe WW2 (The World) They mostly play as Germany, USSR and the USA
Nooooo my beautiful Sri Lankan formable…. 😭
it would be so fun if hyperant just said fuck it and gave every country 5 formables and didnt give a fuck about historical accuracy. just imagine being brazil, forming united states of south america and getting cores in all of south america. or the equatorial empire requiring all the countries in the equator
2:54 room reveal goes hard
Did you feel the vibration when I subbed?
hope you enjoy that vibration
They should add levant and middle east and carribean as formables.
Rise of nations will update when Amandus makes a video non ron related
I am subbed
10:39 Stupid Idea, people would get for example China, Capture Taiwan, move their capital to Taipei and say "oh wow guess I formed RoC fair and square"
They should give the balken federation a modifier
Guys I think Hyperant might secretly be a Anglo/ Eurocentric
What do you think of singleplayer, ai cannot train units (the last time i played it) making it imo not fun
Rise Of Nations team would do nothing about this problem. They just have money and no competitors, so why update the game?
I just noticed this was only uploaded an hour ago
look at this guy ! as if hyperant going even listen
Moldova's formable needs a modifier
The forgot to add indian formables like AKHAND BHARAT
11:21 MON FRÈRE FRANÇAIS, si seulement nous étions dans un monde parfait où Amandus était français et pas suédois
4:13 whats that game?
Age of History 3
Its looking lie a good game, have tried the aoh2
Okk
Did you get your account back
How come they removed Ruthenia but NAU gets to stay?
SRI LANKA MENTIONED RAHHHHHH
Funny that the British empire flag ISN'T even the British empire flag 😂
My friend general glob made a video on you, lol
I don't want inhistorical formables, it's annoying and I'm a stupid nerd. But please update modifiers man benelux gets NOTHING.
Also why did they remove kingdom of Jerusalem for Cyprus?
5:45 "um actually courland livonia really existed and it shouldnt be under fictional formables" - :nerd: probably me
Guys but you know that this game wont be updated anymore?
New formable Idea:
Cool Empire:
Antartica , Greenland , Northern Russia , Canada and Alaska
Modifiers
Winter attack 1000% boost
Iceland too
Bro once you got that you would become literal uninvadeable unless you frick up massively or the enemy just house mountains on mountains of units/nukes
sounds very 🆒
@@Gaditier iceland is a misleading name
@Thagreatchemist Iceland is still in the Arctic
What game was that at minut 4.15 ?
I wish aoh3 had formable modifiers
i wish you could seize treasury in aoh3