Hey guys, we'll start the reviewing of 1.85 planes with the SM.91! I know its not Supersonic, but she's magnificent regardless. Hope you enjoy! Dont forget to like, comment and subscribe for more. And if you want support the channel a bit more, make sure to check out the patreon link in the description. Have a great day!
Axis plane with 6(+1) cannons gets dropped low at RB3.7. Who would have thought it. Poor old 1939 Whirlwind with 4 low ammo cannons/broken flight model got dropped at 5.0 initially, move along nothing to see.
It would be so clean if they didn't insist on putting one wheel in the center instead of two tiny dragger wheels on the tails... OMG I hate that aesthetic! Its like a P-38 Lightning for Italian peasants. The dockable rear turret is cool design, but on a fighter? I'd rather have the reduced weight not having another 150lb person and gun, and give me more forward ammo and guns.
20mm rear turret, and 6 20mm guns all mounted in the nose. This thing is devastating. The king of head-ons and king of strafing runs on ground targets.
Just that stat card says all, who in hell is crazy to head-on a plane WITH 6 MG151/20? As soon as they unlock ammo belts and use Air targets, anything in front of it is dead to a million pieces of what should have been a plane going down. It's painfully hilarious to see this at 3.7, the performance firepower wise is the best, i do not know however how it fares in everything else.
@@qazwsxedcbob5791, one way to avoid being mince metal on a headon is to do long range bursting, given luck and good gun alignment range (400-600m for cannons, 400-300m for HMGs, bellow 300 if shooting peashooters).
@Asif Talpur because it was a fast and powerful fighter with 3 20mm and 2 12.7mm, capable of carrying a 1000kg bomb and 2 160kg. Basically a p47 with the maneuverability and the aspect of a g56.
@Asif Talpur yup, there are many interesting airplanes that could be added, personally I would love to see the Sai ambrosini ss4, basically an italian xp-55.
I think what everyone brushes over is that they know the SM.79 and forget that there’s a whole different number at the start and treat it like a SM.79 then get brushed
Was completely underrated - I’m working on getting it. Saw someone get 7 kills in RB last night. The moves it could pull and speed in a dive was outstanding. Can’t wait to fly it! The other planes - Re2001 - absolute delights to fly.
I LOVE flying the SM91, definetly my favourite heavy fighter, and the gunner is deadly, I got quite a few kills with it. can't wait for the improved SM92!!
It 's a narval with a lower battle rating, amazing plane trully Seen it yesterday, immediatly research it. Cheap ans easy tout research and god this turret is beautifull
SM.91 is brilliant! the firepower is absolutely insane. Why Gaijin classify this thing as "attacker"? It really is a heavy fighter. BTW mate, try out the new Reggiane 2001 CN. It feels like a slower Spacefire Mk.IIB with MG-151s and no fuel cut out in negative Gs. It's very interesting. And, good video as always, merry Christmas
@@Chris-yy5pj early CL are only in mid tier BR. Considering there's 10.0 in three branches, it'd be relatively safe to assume late WWII BBs could be merely 8.0 with missile ships at 10.0
Do you have video explanation about flaps? Take off and Landing ones? I don't understand when to use them. Usually i use combat when im about to fight and Raised to gain altitude with my BF-109. Also what type of ammo should i use for the BF-109? Universal because of the HE right? As far as i understand tracers have AP and help you aim better but have lower dmg.
for the mg151's i always use air targets or stealth. Air targets are the highest damage belt, and stealth is close and gives you surprise. I dont have a flaps vid atm, though i have one dogfight vid going into flaps a bit.
@@jengar6258Alright, thanks for the reply Jengar. Appreciate it. When i can use Air target ammo i use it, in the other belt i put Universal but i will try stealth. :)
It´s cool when we finally have some new planes in WT. DO-335 FM was changed.........do you have some plan for new gameplay with DO-335? All FW-190s FM was also changed. I hope they will add more planes.
That's a dirty dirty plane.... Hitlerbolt reborn with more dakkas... I spaded it in 9 matches (36 kills). I had to take a shower after that. I wont touch it as i still remember how it felt to be in a US team facing 6 hitlerbolts annihilating the team in 3 min top.
I really enjoyed this plane in SB. A little off topic: Maybe you can talk to your good buddies about this issue I discovered - The rear gunners. There appears to no longer exist a separate control for rear gunners. In one plane, you cannot move your rear gunner on any axis but can still fire using the LMB. On another plane you can use the mouse to move your rear gunner but cannot use the LMB to fire, you have to use the trigger on joystick (which makes it very awkward). On another plane you can do neither. Please ask your buddies at Gaijin to resolve this issue for rear gunners. The old way of using your mouse to aim on the axis and the LMB to fire was fine. Now it is guess work, which you do not have time for in the heat of a battle.
I never play Italian planes because statcard-wise they're average for me. You just proved me wrong mate. Nice review. Keep it up. See you at the skies. 👍👍👍
Say jengar, would you care to make a video of the control setup you use? It would be really helpful! As would a video about how to aim in rb because I suck, hehe. Marvelous video as always! Oh, and have a great Christmas with your family :)
I forgot what this plane was as I hadn't played for a while, as last man on our team in realistic I had altitude advantage with 4 opponents on the deck and I made the mistake of going into a head on with this baby, what a fuck up! I could have taken them all with a bit of luck and patience, still haunts me...oh dear it's one of them, shit....
Just did my own review that will be up on my channel tomorrow. For once we both agree that a twin engined fighter is pretty damn good #Ki-108 ;) (Yes i know this is an attacker, but i mostly used it as a fighter)
I feel so bad 6 20 mil cannons with anti aircraft and 20 mil rear gun like dam also its fast and surprsingly manuverable (for its size and 2 engines alos its armament).
It’s a brick when stock.... I have an idea where you make first 10 review on the new aircraft where you fly 10 matches in the new aircraft from the fully stock condition. It will be interesting to watch.
it would be if i was still 24, in uni, with loads of time on my hands. Im usually between 5-8 matches in a plane when i make my review. 42 , work, kid, family, and all the rest of life, is quite different from what it used to be mate ;) Im lucky i have the skill that i have, and have good material is so little games, otherwise i would make 1-2 vids a week.
that really is wildly different, editing and rendering alone takes 2.5 hours at least, if all goes perfect. making the voiceover is usually 30-45 minutes as well. Test flight and researching my data is usually 60-90 minutes. And before that its flying matches to get the material, which can take anywhere from 1 to 4 hours. in the absolute best case scenario making a video takes 5 hours. But thats almost never the case, i'd say 6-7 hours is more usual.
Well i tried her as a fighter in the review that im posting tomorrow, i show it to do multiple roles too. Feel free to check it out. And im sure you can ace that! Ive used the HS as a fighter before, its so fun. IL-2's, JU-87's etc are also fun!
Interesting plane, 6 x 20mm = BR 3.7...S.O. 8000 Narval with 6 x 20mm = BR 5.7...Fw 190 A5/U12 with 6 x 20mm = BR 4.7 (6.0 in AB)...I wonder how long it will remain at BR 3.7...You should have told everyone it was awful, lolz...
@@motoxbluedog2388 I was just using the 6 x 20mm setups...The 190 A5 is far inferior to the 190 A4 @ 4.3 in my opinion even with the extra 20mm's...As soon as he said it was a wonderful plane you suddenly saw an increase in them in game...lolz
@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 I cannot relate due to not flying bombers and only the occasional attacker...I was premising the BR based on Jengar's glowing review of what a great plane he thought it was and the fact that as soon as gaijin finds out there will be a "fix" to the BR...
@@HochgeborenKlown This thing is a great plane with an extremely high firepower, but much like the MC.202EC and the Ba.88 getting that firepower on target can be difficult for the average player. The 20 mm in the back does make an incredible difference thought. I can now rely on the back gunner doing something other than giving away my position, since the back .30 cal of the Ba.88 does no damage at all.
@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 Guess I need to get that thing then and see...I agree about the 202EC, one of my favorite planes till gaijin "fixed" the rudder and now using it causes me to cartwheel across the sky while stalling...Getting the firepower on target is my biggest complaint about the BR rankings, in AB the 190 A5/U2 is 6.0 and the A4 is 4.3 because the A4 has 2 fewer 20mm's...Many guns do you no good if you cannot bring them on target...
Five forward firing (three in the nose and two in the wings' roots), the sixth is for the rear gunner. The first prototype had not the rear firing cannon installed when the only picture showing it's rear part was taken, but the aircraft was designed to have it. i.pinimg.com/originals/26/04/bc/2604bc05ae1ee4b16eb522dcfe3e2140.jpg
It was clearly inspired, but the guys at Savoia Marchetti went further, realising that the central nachelle had not much sense in that configuration. The SM92, without it, with the same powerplant, was smaller, faster, and could carry an heavier load. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savoia-Marchetti_SM.92
I dont see how this plane is good. Currently stock, its hard to reach bombers, cant out turn/roll/dive/climb/loop ANY plane I come across, even had an F4U stuck on my tail that I couldnt shake, and the gunner didnt even phase him.
Jengar oh I don't want to, but it's such a pain to get upgrades. 8 games and not 1 kill or assist. Can't even ground pound bcuz all I've seen were tanks, which the guns didn't even hurt them. Kinda hard to say a plane is good when it's shit while stock...
@@jengar6258 I meant the design :) as for the turn rate I don't really know, depends on the versions but I see the G being a good contestant. The thing is this plane is a lot slower than the P-38
![War Thunder Realistic: M.B.157 [Gimme Ammo!!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/io177PQBQR4/mqdefault.jpg)
![War Thunder Realistic: M.B.157 [Gimme Ammo!!]](/img/tr.png)
![War Thunder Realistic: Spitfire Mk Vc [Beastmode Engaged!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xwqNtTNNaJY/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey guys, we'll start the reviewing of 1.85 planes with the SM.91! I know its not Supersonic, but she's magnificent regardless. Hope you enjoy! Dont forget to like, comment and subscribe for more. And if you want support the channel a bit more, make sure to check out the patreon link in the description. Have a great day!
Please play the French br1.3 bomber the
F222222222222222
You said I surrender in an Italian plane lol
Also you may want to try the p108 with the 102mm gun cause of how gaijin changed the way it aims
Axis plane with 6(+1) cannons gets dropped low at RB3.7. Who would have thought it. Poor old 1939 Whirlwind with 4 low ammo cannons/broken flight model got dropped at 5.0 initially, move along nothing to see.
Sorry, no comment on your great ability, just frustration at WT and the on going demise of anyone who doesn't fly Axis or US RB
It’s what happens when a P-38, Il-2 and Fw-189 have a good time without safety precautions
It would be so clean if they didn't insist on putting one wheel in the center instead of two tiny dragger wheels on the tails... OMG I hate that aesthetic! Its like a P-38 Lightning for Italian peasants. The dockable rear turret is cool design, but on a fighter? I'd rather have the reduced weight not having another 150lb person and gun, and give me more forward ammo and guns.
@@BoopSnoot kinda useful tbh. Its not uncommon for me to pull some trick with those against enemy with better turn rate.
....wow
P38 with a 20mm back turret.
and it doesn't wobble like P38 does.
You should see the version that comes after it lol
20mm rear turret, and 6 20mm guns all mounted in the nose. This thing is devastating. The king of head-ons and king of strafing runs on ground targets.
Seems like a beast for taking down bombers - might have to grind this one out.
Hope that you and your family have a great Christmas.
thanks mate, same to you and yours! and you have to indeed! :)
Ive seen alot of people crying about these ingame, trying headons and getting evaporated
dont try headons with this monster ;)
Just that stat card says all, who in hell is crazy to head-on a plane WITH 6 MG151/20? As soon as they unlock ammo belts and use Air targets, anything in front of it is dead to a million pieces of what should have been a plane going down.
It's painfully hilarious to see this at 3.7, the performance firepower wise is the best, i do not know however how it fares in everything else.
i headon one and survived
@@qazwsxedcbob5791, one way to avoid being mince metal on a headon is to do long range bursting, given luck and good gun alignment range (400-600m for cannons, 400-300m for HMGs, bellow 300 if shooting peashooters).
6 mg151 is like the dream
Agreed! :)
Sometimes you see an F-82 with gun pod and sometimes you see a VB.10
I'd prefer only 4 of them.
It would be lighter or thete would be more place for ammo.
Damian030303 it wouldn’t make much of a difference on a heavy fighter
It would be a bit faster.
It's hidden alright. I didn't even know it existed😂
well, you know now! :)
6xmg151's in the nose....Christmas came early for you this year my friend :)
i love me some mg151 ;)
@@jengar6258 Me too :)
I'm so happy that Italy got some planes actually worth a try. Hopefully next we can get the re 2002 and even the re 2005 saggaritto
*sagittario
@@makruldur u know what I mean XD
@@Chris-yy5pj np👍xD
@Asif Talpur because it was a fast and powerful fighter with 3 20mm and 2 12.7mm, capable of carrying a 1000kg bomb and 2 160kg. Basically a p47 with the maneuverability and the aspect of a g56.
@Asif Talpur yup, there are many interesting airplanes that could be added, personally I would love to see the Sai ambrosini ss4, basically an italian xp-55.
I think what everyone brushes over is that they know the SM.79 and forget that there’s a whole different number at the start and treat it like a SM.79 then get brushed
that will change quick enough ;)
Was completely underrated - I’m working on getting it. Saw someone get 7 kills in RB last night. The moves it could pull and speed in a dive was outstanding. Can’t wait to fly it!
The other planes - Re2001 - absolute delights to fly.
As soon as i saw the thumbnail, i thought: Italian P-38 with G55 engines? Damn
Your aiming is so good.
CrazySpitfire o7
I LOVE flying the SM91, definetly my favourite heavy fighter, and the gunner is deadly, I got quite a few kills with it. can't wait for the improved SM92!!
Yessss I was waiting for this video so much! Thx Jengar.
Np marco! :)
An Italian P-61/P-38 hybrid
much more maneuverable though, and the best firepower :)
Damn this plane is a beast. Cant wait to try it! Thanks for the video Jengar!
Had a hilarious game in this, in which 4 enemies were flying low in a tight formation. Took them out in a single pass ^^
GOOD timing Jengar!
The past couple of days I've been grinding for this. (a total of 4 planes to unlock before this one)
damn, its worth it though :)
Jengar your the best keep up the Italian plane videos
np mate :)
i got 4 kills today with it =) Such a surprise. Thanks for the vid mate!!
It 's a narval with a lower battle rating, amazing plane trully
Seen it yesterday, immediatly research it.
Cheap ans easy tout research and god this turret is beautifull
yup!
Lovely airplane. Good video! Merry christmas to you and your family 😃
Thanks mate!
The rear turret on this thing looks nuts! Like something out of sci fi lol, love it!
ye, agreed, its futuristic
Just got it....Iam gonna watch your video.....thanks for posting JENGAR!👍😎✈
Good play. Merry christmas!
Soo cool, never heard about this plane till now.
its a hidden gem in this patch!
Another well done vid Sir thank you, I never miss a vid o7
SM.91 is brilliant! the firepower is absolutely insane. Why Gaijin classify this thing as "attacker"? It really is a heavy fighter.
BTW mate, try out the new Reggiane 2001 CN. It feels like a slower Spacefire Mk.IIB with MG-151s and no fuel cut out in negative Gs. It's very interesting.
And, good video as always, merry Christmas
chaars mate, same to you!
THAT'S A LOT OF DAMAGE
indeed james!
Saw somebady get an ace in a game with this today... They said had 3 kills from the turret lol
Pft right and gaijin will add battleships 😂
@@Chris-yy5pj well Gaijin added air to air missiles... That reality is not too far off
@@Chris-yy5pj early CL are only in mid tier BR. Considering there's 10.0 in three branches, it'd be relatively safe to assume late WWII BBs could be merely 8.0 with missile ships at 10.0
i can imagine , 3 kills with the turret is definitely possible :)
@@Chris-yy5pj welp, they sure did
Love the review will definately pick this plane up subbed too !
Thanks YA, and welcome aboard!
Love the videos, best part of the day
warthunder really loves italian
looks like it!
Do you have video explanation about flaps? Take off and Landing ones? I don't understand when to use them. Usually i use combat when im about to fight and Raised to gain altitude with my BF-109.
Also what type of ammo should i use for the BF-109? Universal because of the HE right? As far as i understand tracers have AP and help you aim better but have lower dmg.
for the mg151's i always use air targets or stealth. Air targets are the highest damage belt, and stealth is close and gives you surprise. I dont have a flaps vid atm, though i have one dogfight vid going into flaps a bit.
@@jengar6258Alright, thanks for the reply Jengar. Appreciate it. When i can use Air target ammo i use it, in the other belt i put Universal but i will try stealth. :)
Man 6 meatball cannons. I need to get a new controller if I want to fly planes again.
U dont use a keyboard?
Cameron Neal my console is on a dresser with little space left over. It 5 feet of the ground.
@@derpypotatos4610 i moved my xbox to my desk and hooked up a mouse and keyboard, trust me it works so much better
It´s cool when we finally have some new planes in WT. DO-335 FM was changed.........do you have some plan for new gameplay with DO-335? All FW-190s FM was also changed. I hope they will add more planes.
eventually i'll get to it ;)
That's a dirty dirty plane.... Hitlerbolt reborn with more dakkas... I spaded it in 9 matches (36 kills). I had to take a shower after that. I wont touch it as i still remember how it felt to be in a US team facing 6 hitlerbolts annihilating the team in 3 min top.
I really enjoyed this plane in SB. A little off topic: Maybe you can talk to your good buddies about this issue I discovered - The rear gunners. There appears to no longer exist a separate control for rear gunners. In one plane, you cannot move your rear gunner on any axis but can still fire using the LMB. On another plane you can use the mouse to move your rear gunner but cannot use the LMB to fire, you have to use the trigger on joystick (which makes it very awkward). On another plane you can do neither. Please ask your buddies at Gaijin to resolve this issue for rear gunners. The old way of using your mouse to aim on the axis and the LMB to fire was fine. Now it is guess work, which you do not have time for in the heat of a battle.
i dont have any real buddies at gaijin unfortunately, make sure to report it on the bug forum.
This thing gave me a big question: Do I put a Talisman onto the Sm.91 or the P. 108B Series 1... Longterm I would say P. 108, but I dunno...
-BANJO- *TheLPN05Fan1 I’d put a Talisman on the G14 if I was you. You can grind the whole tree with it.
I never play Italian planes because statcard-wise they're average for me. You just proved me wrong mate. Nice review. Keep it up. See you at the skies. 👍👍👍
Jengar, if you put the Dutch orange triangles on this one it looks just like the fokker g1.
yeah, fair enough :)
Different engines Flip v d
@@makonaima1 he said it LOOKS like it. As in similar.
Italians: No this is not op it's balanced.
Also Italians: 6 mg151/20 and a minengeschoß turret.
enough firepower thats for sure ;)
@@jengar6258 Not to talk about their Yak like gameplay with extra dive performance and mg151 since br3.0
Good job Jengar. Yours video's helps me a lot. Please make a video with spitfire griffon mk 22
Your thumbnail made it on to Wikipedia!!!
hurray! :)
Say jengar, would you care to make a video of the control setup you use? It would be really helpful! As would a video about how to aim in rb because I suck, hehe. Marvelous video as always! Oh, and have a great Christmas with your family :)
SM.91 the god emperor of 20mm
agreed!
@@jengar6258 have you bothered to make a premium review of the American premium KI 64
I ment ki 61- 1b
Jengar great video again! Do you have any suggestions countering the SM91 ? It is quite dominate at the current tier.
dont headon, make sure you have an energy advantage. sideclimb if you have to.
Yesss wanted to see this one thx jengar
I don't know what is it about that plane crash but it look cool
hehe!
Hi Jengar! Attackers are marvelous indeed! I'd like to see you performing in the Monster Bf110 G-2 at same BR. Unrivaled firepower of 12.77kg/s !
g-2 review is up since it came out!
Just finished spading it! It’s fun as hell. I got two victories dogfighting Mk IX Spits. LoL 😂 this thing is a meme machine
hehe, agreed!
Mabye i should make a shitpost about it on "Warthunder Gaijob posting" on facebook.
nah, dont alert them..
Oh a good narval
absolutely! :)
@@jengar6258 Narval has a bit more style but the trade of efficiency for style is not really good in fight x)
Nothing survives a hit from those 6 nose-mounted 20mm's. Nothing.
Absolutely, their devastating!
Oof I was a little hit late this time I was working out😆
Bad Girl!! Good that you're working out though!
OHH MY GOD....NOW I WANT THE CS 10 IN WT
I remember my first game since the update... OOF
with this plane or against it?
Its a little Narval in game ;)
Omg, first game with it, 4 kills lol
Like you say, instant success 😉
nice1 mate!
saw you in a match with this plane man. lost my mind hahaha
I forgot what this plane was as I hadn't played for a while, as last man on our team in realistic I had altitude advantage with 4 opponents on the deck and I made the mistake of going into a head on with this baby, what a fuck up! I could have taken them all with a bit of luck and patience, still haunts me...oh dear it's one of them, shit....
we all make mistakes Nicolas, we try to learn from them! o7
italians dont surrender jengar!! they just switch sides so they never lose
Hey @Jengar are you still putting out new content I haven’t had any notifications of anything new anyway I hope all is well you and your family
My crystal ball says this one will go up in BR.
Just did my own review that will be up on my channel tomorrow. For once we both agree that a twin engined fighter is pretty damn good #Ki-108 ;) (Yes i know this is an attacker, but i mostly used it as a fighter)
ki-108 as a fighter? you have more time on your hands then me ;)
Hehe XD My review is up
WTF OP
Does this plane have a fire distinguisher? I was on fire many times but without doing anything fire tends to go out itself.
How do you like this in comparison to the ME 410 or BF 110 at 3.7?
(OP)
maybe, the fm isnt though, although its fun, the firepower is brutal though at 3.7.
Was wondering why my P51D5 was getting converted into flying debry when I went on a head on haha, forgot to mention nice vid :D
Cheers stefan!
It's like the German FW 189.
This one is new to me...
A like and a comment to help the channel.
I feel so bad 6 20 mil cannons with anti aircraft and 20 mil rear gun like dam also its fast and surprsingly manuverable (for its size and 2 engines alos its armament).
Hi Jengar, how's your son? Is he healthy now?
He's stopped coughing a few days ago, and can breath trough the nose again. I think he's alright ;)
@@jengar6258 Glad to hear it. I hope he will join you in War Thunder someday :D
It’s a brick when stock.... I have an idea where you make first 10 review on the new aircraft where you fly 10 matches in the new aircraft from the fully stock condition. It will be interesting to watch.
it would be if i was still 24, in uni, with loads of time on my hands. Im usually between 5-8 matches in a plane when i make my review. 42 , work, kid, family, and all the rest of life, is quite different from what it used to be mate ;) Im lucky i have the skill that i have, and have good material is so little games, otherwise i would make 1-2 vids a week.
Jengar Al right, no worries man.... How much time does it takes from recording until releasing video?
that really is wildly different, editing and rendering alone takes 2.5 hours at least, if all goes perfect. making the voiceover is usually 30-45 minutes as well. Test flight and researching my data is usually 60-90 minutes. And before that its flying matches to get the material, which can take anywhere from 1 to 4 hours. in the absolute best case scenario making a video takes 5 hours. But thats almost never the case, i'd say 6-7 hours is more usual.
I think i figured out your rating scales from lowest to highest
Abismle
Poor
Not gud
Decent
Average
Gud
Pretty gud
Excellent
FANTASTICA
They put this plane on my name XD
“Reminds me of a certain French plane”
Lol that plane is not as competitive as this one
agreed!
I saw this thing and was immediately interested in it. Unfortunately the bombload is too low to be an effective attacker
Lets be real, how many people are actually going to use it in the attacker role?
@@Joseph-2000 Well, I know I would. I am a ground attacker at heart and I enjoy popping tanks and pillboxes.
Understandable. Everyone has their preference. But try this as a fighter at least once!
I have played the duck as a fighter at least once in this game. So I think I can do it, especially with the amount of weaponry in the nose
Well i tried her as a fighter in the review that im posting tomorrow, i show it to do multiple roles too. Feel free to check it out. And im sure you can ace that! Ive used the HS as a fighter before, its so fun. IL-2's, JU-87's etc are also fun!
Omg 6 mg151
Powered by Caesar
Отличный самолёт
Interesting plane, 6 x 20mm = BR 3.7...S.O. 8000 Narval with 6 x 20mm = BR 5.7...Fw 190 A5/U12 with 6 x 20mm = BR 4.7 (6.0 in AB)...I wonder how long it will remain at BR 3.7...You should have told everyone it was awful, lolz...
Yep, all of a sudden starting to see more of them, Jengar fans maybe. You forgot 1939 Whirlwind with 4x Mk1 HitSparkNos at 5.0
@@motoxbluedog2388 I was just using the 6 x 20mm setups...The 190 A5 is far inferior to the 190 A4 @ 4.3 in my opinion even with the extra 20mm's...As soon as he said it was a wonderful plane you suddenly saw an increase in them in game...lolz
@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 I cannot relate due to not flying bombers and only the occasional attacker...I was premising the BR based on Jengar's glowing review of what a great plane he thought it was and the fact that as soon as gaijin finds out there will be a "fix" to the BR...
@@HochgeborenKlown This thing is a great plane with an extremely high firepower, but much like the MC.202EC and the Ba.88 getting that firepower on target can be difficult for the average player. The 20 mm in the back does make an incredible difference thought. I can now rely on the back gunner doing something other than giving away my position, since the back .30 cal of the Ba.88 does no damage at all.
@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 Guess I need to get that thing then and see...I agree about the 202EC, one of my favorite planes till gaijin "fixed" the rudder and now using it causes me to cartwheel across the sky while stalling...Getting the firepower on target is my biggest complaint about the BR rankings, in AB the 190 A5/U2 is 6.0 and the A4 is 4.3 because the A4 has 2 fewer 20mm's...Many guns do you no good if you cannot bring them on target...
Pls do f100 :3
2:46 esplosion?
Anti armor belts have explosive rounds
all hail the flying spaghetti monster! may we be blessed by his noodley appendages!
Should have 5 cannons if it was historically accurate. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savoia-Marchetti_SM.91
Five forward firing (three in the nose and two in the wings' roots), the sixth is for the rear gunner. The first prototype had not the rear firing cannon installed when the only picture showing it's rear part was taken, but the aircraft was designed to have it. i.pinimg.com/originals/26/04/bc/2604bc05ae1ee4b16eb522dcfe3e2140.jpg
P-38+fw-190+il-2=sm. 91
Hey Italy! Lockheed called, and they want their Lightning back! XD it looks like a P-38 to me with a tail turret.
It was clearly inspired, but the guys at Savoia Marchetti went further, realising that the central nachelle had not much sense in that configuration. The SM92, without it, with the same powerplant, was smaller, faster, and could carry an heavier load. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savoia-Marchetti_SM.92
6:52 .... without a minengeshoss shell? I mean seriously what is that question
just use a mig and it's done in a sec 😁😁
I dont see how this plane is good. Currently stock, its hard to reach bombers, cant out turn/roll/dive/climb/loop ANY plane I come across, even had an F4U stuck on my tail that I couldnt shake, and the gunner didnt even phase him.
dont judge a plane on its stock performance!
Jengar oh I don't want to, but it's such a pain to get upgrades. 8 games and not 1 kill or assist. Can't even ground pound bcuz all I've seen were tanks, which the guns didn't even hurt them.
Kinda hard to say a plane is good when it's shit while stock...
stock is just a fase, spaded it kicks ass.
Now its ruined
second
not bad ;)
First
well done sir!
Cant help myself but it looks like you are playing against bots
obviously, when i appear suddenly ppl all change into bots. weird eh
definitely not a P-38
similar, better firepower and maneuverability i would say!
@@jengar6258 I meant the design :) as for the turn rate I don't really know, depends on the versions but I see the G being a good contestant. The thing is this plane is a lot slower than the P-38