That's such a lie. Manufacturers would like to increase their consumer base by 1000% (guessing) but probably don't openly support it because it's not an area where much ground can be won federally.
nah, there would just be a new market for cheap ass aluminum traditional baffle, hunting style suppressors that cost barely anything. they would last a year or two at most and be completely worn out. there will always be a higher end market for nicer stuff. the reason suppressors are so expensive is not just because of the nfa, but also because the materials involved HAVE to be higher quality because we expect our suppressors to last.
Spectrum analyzer... tone matters depending on application. Suppressing a 300BO for HD to preserve my ears is diff than suppressing downrange signature to reduce the ability to ID source of shot
We did a video a few years ago and discovered at 200 yards there was no measurable difference in sound/pressure from both a suppressed and unsuppressed rifle.
An important thing about tone, low frequencies travel farther, high frequencies dissipate a lot faster. So high tone suppressors actually do a much better job of suppressing at a distance.
@@Estop117 Yep. Interestingly this was also the same decision made for the M1 Abrams. The turbine engine was far harder to detect a distance when running compared to the regular muffled diesel.
Trouble with tone, in a hunting, and particularly a culling scenario, it is not YOUR hearing that is important. It’s if the piggys can hear where the shots are coming from.
A flush-fitting adapter does make it short, but there are recessed adapters with expansion chambers which shroud the barrel. From a length prespective that's essentially extra "free" gas capture, so for a hunting rifle that would probably be a better design choice.
The “added volume” is negligible. Most barrels and silencers are .75in OD and 1.25 OD. And wall thickness of .125 or 1/8” in. To calc the space: taking the radius of the silencer minus the radius of the barrel minus the two walls for the overbarrel silencer. 1.25/2: .625” silencer radius .75/2 : .375” barrel radius 2 walls : .25” .625-.375-.25: 0 ZERO! 😂 lol so you could nake some adjustments but the juice isnt worth the squeez
@@allthingsconsidered3211 Silencer and barrel OD isn't standard at all, and you're not going to convince me that reflexed expansion chambers are physically impossible by selecting dimensions which make no sense.
Peak dB means nothing without context. Did anyone evaluate impulse or test at a suitable sample rate to detect meaningul data? Nah bro. We past this dinosaur testing. PewScience has empowered the consumer. Can't pull this stuff anymore.
Sounds like it's a pretty high back pressure can but this is definitely something I'd love to put on my cva 350 legend...it's a single shot break action rifle with a 16 inch barrel that I shoot during primitive weapons season just because it looks like it's a small can.
With all due respect to the hosts status as gun experts, I am an audio expert and former LEO with 40 years of shooting. I have done acoustic test and measurement as expert witness for trials. The human ear will easily detect a 3dB increase. This is the standard increase for virtually all TV volume up and down on a remote control. Very few can hear a 1dB increase. The decibel is a 10log representation of sound pressure level. A 10dB increase is recognized as a doubling of perceived loudness but would be 100 times more sound pressure. Just trying to help here with the stats they are trying their best to present.
We shouldn’t need to pay over $200 for a suppressor IF YOU DONT WANT TO. We should be able to buy the damn “fuel filters” and drill them out. It should not be regulated like guns, it’s not a firearm.
I would love to own suppressors and be able to use them, especially while hunting. But I refuse to pay the tax stamp and have to deal with the paperwork and stupid laws that go along with them. It should be common sense for them to be completely legal without any hassle.
I wouldn’t let that hold you back. The more suppressors out there, the more reason to be considered in common use. The paper work is trivial and similar to filling out a 4473. It’s much simpler now with things like silencer shop available to us. I got an rc2 back in 81 days last year and a cgs mod 9 in 280 this year.
I own many cans and I agree. They are an accessory and hearing protection above all else, absolute madness they aren’t off the shelf parts you could grab same day as a transfer.
I'll take that low tone any time. My 'need' for a suppressor is only for in a house home defense. This sounds like a can I need to follow and learn more about. I'm now torn between this can and a HuxWrx.
I don’t know my take away is that I don’t really enjoy even subsonic 9 mm without hearing protection, but also kind of obsessed with audio and enjoy, using headphones and speakers for gaming and music. I’ve got some experience with suppressors and work at gun store, but I prefer using hearing protection even though I have shot some sub sonic ammo just to see what it would be like in a home defense situation. Yes, if you had to rip some off to defeat a bad guy you would be fine but you wouldn’t want to shoot hundreds of rounds even with a suppressor unless it’s 22. 22 subsonic is legit movie quiet, and extremely fun and hearing safe.
It seems like primarily a pistol caliber can. I just don't know if it's going to work well with a rifle caliber especially 308 and larger due to its small volume.
I' a scientist, but not the kind who entirely understands sound per se. I'm a surgeon, so if if you need a whipple procedure (12 hr surgery) I'm your doc. I did start a gun club with other healthcare workers. Suffice to say, we don't have a high membership. I work at Vanderbilt University. Which is a huge liberal school/hospital.
In addition to the db for the different barrel lengths, it would have been interesting to see the chrono's to see how the fps correlated to the db levels.
I don't own a suppressor but plan on buying one in the future. Maybe "Baffled 2" can be about mounts, adapters and proper tools and methods for securing the barrel when mounting these attachments?
I am about to get my first silencer and putting it on a 300BO, I want to tuck it under a handguard, like an SD configuration, is it better to go direct thread or QD? I've heard both, I've heard direct thread because I'm not taking it on and off, and I've heard QD because the lockup is guaranteed not to come lose. What would you say?
9:31 I would speculate the short “MP5” is quieter because the bolt is staying shut longer. I’d imagine the longer barrel + can on a roller delayed blowback means the bolt is opening faster and you’re picking up Dbs from the port
@@kevinwicklund5914they can but the new rules surrounding them are nothing but a trap to try to mess with people later. They now want a full in depth detail description, with pictures, of the step by step processes you took to make it beginning to end. Gonna get used to harrass people for intent later somehow because "we know you know how to make them, you gave us the instructions how to"
@@kevinwicklund5914they only approve them if you can give them proof that you’re making it completely from scratch. They stopped letting people turn solvent trap kits into Form 1 suppressors. Pretty bullshit but, you can get it done if you’ve got the tools and equipment
Wait one.....if you actually don't hear a loud shot, it doesn't hurt your ears, but if the meter hears it as loud then it's NOT safe? I don't get it. So if their were no meters and you just judge by actually hearing.... Nevermind. I admit that I'm not smart enough to "get it". Great video..... For smart people.
I think it's great you're measuring peak dB, but I think you should start adding the disclaimer that peak dB reduction doesn't necisarily mean it's a quieter can, or that it is less damaging to you ears. Pewscience has shown this to be the case many times.
Suppressors are nowhere NEAR as popular in the real world as they are for UA-camrs or that they would like you to believe. Less than a 1/10th of the guys I know, that I shoot with or just at the range, have a can. Even asking the guys at all the local gun stores has validated my observation. Not until they are taken from the NFA and manufacturers stop acting like they are made from gold, will many guys buy one.
What optic and mount do you have on the 300 blackout? I have a vintage .30 caliber Fisher/SEI rifle suppressor that has been updated to Smith Enterprise Wind Talker specs that delivers acceptable industry standard noise reduction with supersonic .308 and .223, the can is field serviceable, cleanable and rebuildable. It's a large heavy can that could easily double as a billy club, and I love it. As for 'hearing safe', I wear hearing protection when shooting suppressed rifles because no suppressor will eliminate the sonic crack and that crack will eventually ruin your hearing. Also, I can't recall the name of the group that put this meet on, but I participated in a suppressor metering event held in N.E. Georgia a little over a year ago, they had three meters in different positions, and I was firing a 16.25" M14 and a Daewoo K2. The results were very similar to what you showed in this video. RIP ~ Bobby Knight
So that's a pretty slick setup. I've been a huge an of AB Suppressor cans for this same kinda reason. I run their .375 magnum can and I can suppress almost anything. They do the same thing with adaptors so I can add an ASR Mount or whatever I'm doing with it. or I can even reflex it like the M110 can. I did a Scar 20 with a similar can setup. Super cool. I'm still a huge AB guy but there's nobody else going in their direction so this is cool to see!
I am looking for a muffler for my 350 legend deer rifle (AR) that will be hearing safe as I have already lost some hearing between age and shooting a lot.
Hey, could you do a video on the Adams P2 aars vs Ruger Sfar vs POF Rogue di vs POF Revolution piston? I would really love to know which one of the new small frame .308 rifles is best, or best for your money. Plus maybe the Roam and Vseven magnesium AR-10s for good measure.
It’s something you need to be aware of. Maybe don’t try if you have asthma or copd. Tank crews deal with the same thing. They have bore evaluators to help.
But the tone does have to do with hearing safeness. It’s like having tweeters at 120 db vs a 15” subwoofer at 120 db, the tweeters will damage hearing but the woofer won’t damage hearing or if it does it’s very little.. So db isn’t the alpha and omega of hearing protection. God’s creation is better than man’s which means if something is painful it’s probably damaging your hearing; and on the flip side, if it sounds pleasant then it’s probably not damaging your hearing…. But as man we have no way to quantify that.
The cost of a suppressor is really still out of reach for the common man. I have two AR's I have put together with parts from BCA, and PSA. And I have less in both guns than that one suppressor. Not even including the stamp. The company that produces a quality, durable suppressor at the sub $500.00 price point will OWN the market. A person who has a basic engineering understanding and a few tools could do it in their garage for cryin out loud. The question is, who is gonna step up?
With regard to the whole "tone" argument, I'll point out there are three basic measures of decibel levels. They are known as dB(A) which is typically used as a model of the human ear but there is also dB(B) and dB(C). The crosspoint is given at 1,000 Hz where they're all equal but under that B & C are higher than A while after it they're both lower. There's a reason sirens are over that threshold is because we're biologically wired to respond those tones or frequencies which includes babies crying, sirens, alarms, etc. The latter two examples being put there to best simulate the first because it's jarring. Unfortunately those higher frequencies are the ones we lose first so I'd say stay in the dB(A) spectrum and worry less about B & C because we don't really hear them all that well but that isn't to say that 500 or even 250 Hz would be a better focus point given typical human range is in the 30 Hz to 20kHz range. I should also point out that many speaker systems go down to 20 Hz but those are the ones you feel less than hear because it vibrates your windows and chest cavity. It's typically the result of the socially obnoxious car drivers who play nothing but "thump, thump, thump" types of music at max volume in their cars because they're obnoxious and purposefully audibly offensive.
It's almost comical that in "the land of the free" we have to go through all this just for a gun muffler...
When PEW Science test this suppressor. We'll believe their claims.
For real
Its coming
They had one the Wrong Jay lol
@@bradleyivie4475 are you apart of this company
I'm afraid that the suppressor industry does not support removing them from NFA regulation. The competition would drastically lower prices.
That's such a lie. Manufacturers would like to increase their consumer base by 1000% (guessing) but probably don't openly support it because it's not an area where much ground can be won federally.
@@loganramsey1957 too hard so they don't...
@@loganramsey1957if silencers were taken off the NFA you could basically make one for the cost of a maglite. Not good for the suppressor industry.
nah, there would just be a new market for cheap ass aluminum traditional baffle, hunting style suppressors that cost barely anything. they would last a year or two at most and be completely worn out. there will always be a higher end market for nicer stuff. the reason suppressors are so expensive is not just because of the nfa, but also because the materials involved HAVE to be higher quality because we expect our suppressors to last.
@@TRIIGGAVELLI cool, now explain 80% lowers and how the gun industry is still alive. Thanks
This feels like an infomercial
Because it’s a paid ad.
Kind of is. But if you trust Mac's opinions and ideas there is some stuff to be gained here.
Can't help but think they were paid to do this.
I'm sorry it just felt that way to me.
Because they were
Yeah, this is their product so shilling abound. This can isn’t anything special
The idea that anyone would use this “test criteria” when PEW Science is a thing is laughable. This is not silencer testing, this is an advertisement.
Spectrum analyzer... tone matters depending on application. Suppressing a 300BO for HD to preserve my ears is diff than suppressing downrange signature to reduce the ability to ID source of shot
We did a video a few years ago and discovered at 200 yards there was no measurable difference in sound/pressure from both a suppressed and unsuppressed rifle.
Can we please get rid of the nfa so we can get suppressors at reasonable prices?
The NFA has suppressed firearms and silencer technology for 89.5 years.
@@LRRPFco52 I know, so it's high time we left behind this archaic and useless law.
at least you get to have suppressors, they're completely illegal in the land up north
So how much did they pay for this ad?
Lol exactly.
An important thing about tone, low frequencies travel farther, high frequencies dissipate a lot faster. So high tone suppressors actually do a much better job of suppressing at a distance.
I was about to comment the same thing. Good to know I'm not the only one!
@@Estop117 Yep. Interestingly this was also the same decision made for the M1 Abrams. The turbine engine was far harder to detect a distance when running compared to the regular muffled diesel.
Trouble with tone, in a hunting, and particularly a culling scenario, it is not YOUR hearing that is important. It’s if the piggys can hear where the shots are coming from.
A flush-fitting adapter does make it short, but there are recessed adapters with expansion chambers which shroud the barrel. From a length prespective that's essentially extra "free" gas capture, so for a hunting rifle that would probably be a better design choice.
This
The “added volume” is negligible. Most barrels and silencers are .75in OD and 1.25 OD. And wall thickness of .125 or 1/8” in.
To calc the space:
taking the radius of the silencer minus the radius of the barrel minus the two walls for the overbarrel silencer.
1.25/2: .625” silencer radius
.75/2 : .375” barrel radius
2 walls : .25”
.625-.375-.25: 0
ZERO!
😂 lol so you could nake some adjustments but the juice isnt worth the squeez
@@allthingsconsidered3211 Silencer and barrel OD isn't standard at all, and you're not going to convince me that reflexed expansion chambers are physically impossible by selecting dimensions which make no sense.
Affordability? The average price for a can is ~1k, 935 is pretty close. YHM and some silencerco cans are much cheaper
Peak dB means nothing without context. Did anyone evaluate impulse or test at a suitable sample rate to detect meaningul data? Nah bro. We past this dinosaur testing. PewScience has empowered the consumer. Can't pull this stuff anymore.
It would be helpful if you included a slide(s) with all the data on screen, so we don't have to jump around to compare numbers.
Sounds like it's a pretty high back pressure can but this is definitely something I'd love to put on my cva 350 legend...it's a single shot break action rifle with a 16 inch barrel that I shoot during primitive weapons season just because it looks like it's a small can.
I think that audiologists say that high pitched loud noises are more damaging.
Have you tried putting antiseize in those threads? I use it on spark plugs that go in aluminum heads.
With all due respect to the hosts status as gun experts, I am an audio expert and former LEO with 40 years of shooting. I have done acoustic test and measurement as expert witness for trials. The human ear will easily detect a 3dB increase. This is the standard increase for virtually all TV volume up and down on a remote control. Very few can hear a 1dB increase. The decibel is a 10log representation of sound pressure level. A 10dB increase is recognized as a doubling of perceived loudness but would be 100 times more sound pressure. Just trying to help here with the stats they are trying their best to present.
Love this! When are you guys gonna put out a podcast? Would love to listen to you two talk about guns and cans on the way to work! 💯
Thanks for the information guys !
Cool i'm growing Haze right now.
Very silently also!
We shouldn’t need to pay over $200 for a suppressor IF YOU DONT WANT TO. We should be able to buy the damn “fuel filters” and drill them out. It should not be regulated like guns, it’s not a firearm.
With sub-sonic ammo still at 130db granted a 30db reduction is incredible.
this changes everything
I would love to own suppressors and be able to use them, especially while hunting. But I refuse to pay the tax stamp and have to deal with the paperwork and stupid laws that go along with them. It should be common sense for them to be completely legal without any hassle.
I completely agree! But I gave up 20 years later and gave in when they promised 90 day approvals. They lied.
@@virtuaguyverify"they lied"
Truly a tale as old as time with them
I wouldn’t let that hold you back. The more suppressors out there, the more reason to be considered in common use. The paper work is trivial and similar to filling out a 4473. It’s much simpler now with things like silencer shop available to us. I got an rc2 back in 81 days last year and a cgs mod 9 in 280 this year.
I own many cans and I agree. They are an accessory and hearing protection above all else, absolute madness they aren’t off the shelf parts you could grab same day as a transfer.
If you own a ford buy and oil filter for your vehicle, and you’ll have quiet oil
I'll take that low tone any time. My 'need' for a suppressor is only for in a house home defense. This sounds like a can I need to follow and learn more about. I'm now torn between this can and a HuxWrx.
Thanks for showing the price immediately - I will watch when I have the dollars to pay
I don’t know my take away is that I don’t really enjoy even subsonic 9 mm without hearing protection, but also kind of obsessed with audio and enjoy, using headphones and speakers for gaming and music. I’ve got some experience with suppressors and work at gun store, but I prefer using hearing protection even though I have shot some sub sonic ammo just to see what it would be like in a home defense situation. Yes, if you had to rip some off to defeat a bad guy you would be fine but you wouldn’t want to shoot hundreds of rounds even with a suppressor unless it’s 22. 22 subsonic is legit movie quiet, and extremely fun and hearing safe.
It seems like primarily a pistol caliber can. I just don't know if it's going to work well with a rifle caliber especially 308 and larger due to its small volume.
Reminds me of my YHM R9. It's a 9mm can that is rated to suppress a 308. It works, it takes the edge off, but it's still pretty loud.
Good info and thanks for the review.
Never heard of this Jay , why would you not have Jay on from PewSci?????
I really like YHM Turbo K. Good weight and price and I can't tell the difference between the K and T2 to the ear. I have 2 K's and one T2.
Infomercial
I' a scientist, but not the kind who entirely understands sound per se. I'm a surgeon, so if if you need a whipple procedure (12 hr surgery) I'm your doc. I did start a gun club with other healthcare workers. Suffice to say, we don't have a high membership. I work at Vanderbilt University. Which is a huge liberal school/hospital.
In addition to the db for the different barrel lengths, it would have been interesting to see the chrono's to see how the fps correlated to the db levels.
I don't own a suppressor but plan on buying one in the future. Maybe "Baffled 2" can be about mounts, adapters and proper tools and methods for securing the barrel when mounting these attachments?
Its crazy that I can walk in to a gun store and walk out with a a gun not a suppressor
Congressman Jeff Duncan has legislation to change that
I enjyed this format/series keep it up
I'd be interested in seeing a comparison to the Dead Air Wolfman suppressor.
I wish i was one of these common men they speak of! 1k + stamp+9months for a muffler.... i guess i won't ever be able to afford to be common
I am about to get my first silencer and putting it on a 300BO, I want to tuck it under a handguard, like an SD configuration, is it better to go direct thread or QD? I've heard both, I've heard direct thread because I'm not taking it on and off, and I've heard QD because the lockup is guaranteed not to come lose. What would you say?
9:31 I would speculate the short “MP5” is quieter because the bolt is staying shut longer. I’d imagine the longer barrel + can on a roller delayed blowback means the bolt is opening faster and you’re picking up Dbs from the port
Good review, thank you*
Search on the net mainly shows your video. Havent found the company OR a price for this suppressor.
www.inerthaze.com/
I'm a form 1 guy, but I love all the new and improved technology coming out.
Form one nowadays? Thought atd didn't approve those anymore?
@@kevinwicklund5914they can but the new rules surrounding them are nothing but a trap to try to mess with people later. They now want a full in depth detail description, with pictures, of the step by step processes you took to make it beginning to end. Gonna get used to harrass people for intent later somehow because "we know you know how to make them, you gave us the instructions how to"
@@kevinwicklund5914 They're still legal. The kits are dried up tho. I happen to have access to SolidWorks and a full machine shop...
I'm a freedom guy, I don't do forms.
@@kevinwicklund5914they only approve them if you can give them proof that you’re making it completely from scratch. They stopped letting people turn solvent trap kits into Form 1 suppressors. Pretty bullshit but, you can get it done if you’ve got the tools and equipment
Wait one.....if you actually don't hear a loud shot, it doesn't hurt your ears, but if the meter hears it as loud then it's NOT safe? I don't get it. So if their were no meters and you just judge by actually hearing....
Nevermind. I admit that I'm not smart enough to "get it".
Great video.....
For smart people.
9mm can that is rifle rated (no-magnum) with interchangeable end caps, thats where its at
its quieter on a short barrel because less powder is being burned, meaning less hot expanding gas.
I think it's great you're measuring peak dB, but I think you should start adding the disclaimer that peak dB reduction doesn't necisarily mean it's a quieter can, or that it is less damaging to you ears. Pewscience has shown this to be the case many times.
No wrench flats on the direct thread mount?? Good luck. Ill stick with my Rex cans.
There is, it's on both the outside and inside of the hub cap.
at 995 plus a stamp these are definitely not made for the common man. Hard Pass
For 1k it's going to be hard to pull me away from a flow through
Oss all the way
It warms my heart to see that after all these years people appreciate OSS for their innovative products.
Suppressors are nowhere NEAR as popular in the real world as they are for UA-camrs or that they would like you to believe. Less than a 1/10th of the guys I know, that I shoot with or just at the range, have a can. Even asking the guys at all the local gun stores has validated my observation. Not until they are taken from the NFA and manufacturers stop acting like they are made from gold, will many guys buy one.
What optic and mount do you have on the 300 blackout?
I have a vintage .30 caliber Fisher/SEI rifle suppressor that has been updated to Smith Enterprise Wind Talker specs that delivers acceptable industry standard noise reduction with supersonic .308 and .223, the can is field serviceable, cleanable and rebuildable. It's a large heavy can that could easily double as a billy club, and I love it. As for 'hearing safe', I wear hearing protection when shooting suppressed rifles because no suppressor will eliminate the sonic crack and that crack will eventually ruin your hearing.
Also, I can't recall the name of the group that put this meet on, but I participated in a suppressor metering event held in N.E. Georgia a little over a year ago, they had three meters in different positions, and I was firing a 16.25" M14 and a Daewoo K2. The results were very similar to what you showed in this video.
RIP ~ Bobby Knight
So that's a pretty slick setup. I've been a huge an of AB Suppressor cans for this same kinda reason. I run their .375 magnum can and I can suppress almost anything. They do the same thing with adaptors so I can add an ASR Mount or whatever I'm doing with it. or I can even reflex it like the M110 can. I did a Scar 20 with a similar can setup. Super cool. I'm still a huge AB guy but there's nobody else going in their direction so this is cool to see!
I am looking for a muffler for my 350 legend deer rifle (AR) that will be hearing safe as I have already lost some hearing between age and shooting a lot.
I don't care so much about reading at the muzzle, I want it quiet on my ear, and not to turn my gun into an atomic pogo stick.
Wish "tone" was actually something measured and benchmarked. Don't recall seeing Jay from Pewscience measuring it, but maybe he does?
What about measuring frequency and including that in the data to compare tone?
Who makes it? They have a website?
Hey, could you do a video on the Adams P2 aars vs Ruger Sfar vs POF Rogue di vs POF Revolution piston?
I would really love to know which one of the new small frame .308 rifles is best, or best for your money.
Plus maybe the Roam and Vseven magnesium AR-10s for good measure.
Is there any reason to run a low back pressure can on a non-semi gun?
No.
I would say no. I run baffled cans on bolt guns and lever actions.
Didn't Gemtech make that can like 9 years ago? It had all of the same ratings, and it was called The One...
Does a silencer/suppressor/can make you breath in toxic gasses?
It is an inanimate object, it can not make you do anything.
@@asherdie More gasses seem to be expelled from the ejection port with the suppressor attached.
It’s something you need to be aware of. Maybe don’t try if you have asthma or copd. Tank crews deal with the same thing. They have bore evaluators to help.
Love the vids.Could you post your code for free mount at primary arms.
Heard you mention it.
Thank You
I’d like to see what you think about the delight defense.
Good informative videos
9:19 longer barrel faster bullet. Louder bullet.
can is different distances to the meter gun to gun. set the can on the rest every time.
But the tone does have to do with hearing safeness.
It’s like having tweeters at 120 db vs a 15” subwoofer at 120 db, the tweeters will damage hearing but the woofer won’t damage hearing or if it does it’s very little..
So db isn’t the alpha and omega of hearing protection.
God’s creation is better than man’s which means if something is painful it’s probably damaging your hearing; and on the flip side, if it sounds pleasant then it’s probably not damaging your hearing…. But as man we have no way to quantify that.
How does it work on a AK and 10mm ?
I dont buy cans without pew science testing them first lol
The Common people.....? Seriously.
Price?
Omega 36M?
The cost of a suppressor is really still out of reach for the common man. I have two AR's I have put together with parts from BCA, and PSA. And I have less in both guns than that one suppressor. Not even including the stamp. The company that produces a quality, durable suppressor at the sub $500.00 price point will OWN the market. A person who has a basic engineering understanding and a few tools could do it in their garage for cryin out loud. The question is, who is gonna step up?
it's a 9mm Scythe-Ti
Lol for the ppl, 100$, wait I mean 935$.
Sounds like vaporware.
I have one can for my pistols and now i need to get one for my rifles........
why this over an omega 9k tho?
With regard to the whole "tone" argument, I'll point out there are three basic measures of decibel levels. They are known as dB(A) which is typically used as a model of the human ear but there is also dB(B) and dB(C). The crosspoint is given at 1,000 Hz where they're all equal but under that B & C are higher than A while after it they're both lower. There's a reason sirens are over that threshold is because we're biologically wired to respond those tones or frequencies which includes babies crying, sirens, alarms, etc. The latter two examples being put there to best simulate the first because it's jarring. Unfortunately those higher frequencies are the ones we lose first so I'd say stay in the dB(A) spectrum and worry less about B & C because we don't really hear them all that well but that isn't to say that 500 or even 250 Hz would be a better focus point given typical human range is in the 30 Hz to 20kHz range.
I should also point out that many speaker systems go down to 20 Hz but those are the ones you feel less than hear because it vibrates your windows and chest cavity. It's typically the result of the socially obnoxious car drivers who play nothing but "thump, thump, thump" types of music at max volume in their cars because they're obnoxious and purposefully audibly offensive.
The only thing good about titanium is that its not aluminum! Its still a weak metal.
Love the silencer video please share more
Inert gays
Any comparison of suppressors should include flash signature.
Inert Haze is a terrible name for a company and "One" is a terrible name for a product
🤘😆🤘
Get a frequency meter for tone
First?
First
Third
We know more than ye because of our infinite wisdom and we also have guns and silencers and a pressure sensor. We are worthy of ya ears.