Bought one of these because it is the most comfortable for me, and XC60's have (slightly) better reliability stats than the competition (here in Europe)
Taking you voice as a baseline, the car sounds very quiet. And, as you mentioned, not a lot of noise difference between lower and higher speeds, which is great.
I've got one and I hardly hear any engine noise (and only when very rarely accelerating hard) - however the wind noise is much more than in the usual competition (eg Velar, Q5) and also more than in some cheaper cars (eg Nissan X-Trail) - for such an expensive car, it's a shame that Volvo didn't put in more sound-proofed glass
I'm thinking of getting xm40. But worried i might not like it after a month. I never had volvo before. I have a Toyota at the mo. Which i love apart from noise
@@DMCarReviews it's fine for daily use but not quick enough to have fun. A few seconds head start is massive. if you both floored it at the same time I'd be bus lengths behind.
@@basslover352 8.5s was the 0-60 time of a Camry V6 in 2005-2006, and that was considered a very quick car. Just because 1000hp Tesla's do it in 2.5s, doesn't make the other cars slow for public roads. You just don't need those numbers for normal use. Now 12-13 seconds I'd say is pretty slow, yet that is what most cars in Europe do.
Bought one of these because it is the most comfortable for me, and XC60's have (slightly) better reliability stats than the competition (here in Europe)
Nice!
Taking you voice as a baseline, the car sounds very quiet. And, as you mentioned, not a lot of noise difference between lower and higher speeds, which is great.
Yes! Very good sound insulation
@@DMCarReviews Oh, btw, did this car have double laminated glass or just the standard one?
@@pavlo2692 Standard
@@DMCarReviews Means the car can be even quieter. Nice.
I've got one and I hardly hear any engine noise (and only when very rarely accelerating hard) - however the wind noise is much more than in the usual competition (eg Velar, Q5) and also more than in some cheaper cars (eg Nissan X-Trail) - for such an expensive car, it's a shame that Volvo didn't put in more sound-proofed glass
I'm thinking of getting xm40. But worried i might not like it after a month. I never had volvo before. I have a Toyota at the mo. Which i love apart from noise
Why are you worried that you won't like the X3 M40i? One of the best cars out there.
Can you do a 2003 Lincoln Navigator Premium?
I'll try to find one
irrelevant to the review but those corollas still need more power for them to be quick. it's like a 8.5 0-60 still.
I had to floor it to get around him in a 455hp SUV, so it's quick enough
@@DMCarReviews it's fine for daily use but not quick enough to have fun. A few seconds head start is massive. if you both floored it at the same time I'd be bus lengths behind.
@@basslover352 8.5s is plenty to have fun! Well, it doesn't always happen that you floor it at the same time...
@@DMCarReviewsthis is true. you don't always expect people to be going for it. Also agreed I'm fine with slower cars if they're a stick.
@@basslover352 8.5s was the 0-60 time of a Camry V6 in 2005-2006, and that was considered a very quick car. Just because 1000hp Tesla's do it in 2.5s, doesn't make the other cars slow for public roads. You just don't need those numbers for normal use. Now 12-13 seconds I'd say is pretty slow, yet that is what most cars in Europe do.
Blurring out the dash doesn't do much if you can read the device showing you 100+ lol
The device and the speedometer are two very different things :)
you have speed limiter at 110
112