Don’t ever think that you need to be pigeon holed into a certain subset of content. Then you will forever be known as the “white forest guy”, when you could be a valuable source of meta related content.
Nothing wrong with this. Granted he is moving on from Ritual Beast, but JojosAsmr admitted he grew to genuinely love the deck because of the lore and artwork outside of being a strong meta contending deck, hence why he is one of the more renowned Ritual Beast players. White Forest/Snake Eye is obviously strong, but also boasts an incredibly compelling lore/storyline as well as one of the better artworks in the game.
Great commentary! Super insightful and I appreciated getting to see these decks performed on the other side of the table. Loved hearing the thought process behind your actions and trying to predict your opponent's plays! Keep it up!!
I always enjoy videos of people explaining their line of thinking during gameplay. I think it helps people learn how to be a better player in a more realistic way
If they vieller witch, you have normal oak, send it and witch to summon out ash and combo from there. Imp/talents/droplets are the only common outs without goddess- and setting imp isn’t a guaranteed strat since good players will attempt to out sets as they know your win con is a set imp resolving. Edit- another win you do have is dharc or hita summoning a body, and then using worldsea to give it back to them and inflicting 8k damage attacking into it
now that you say it the oak play is obvious - thanks! what do you mean by inflicting 8k by attacking the dharc/hiita body? wouldnt it die after the first attack?
@@BimYGO i assume they meant the battle protection of Chaos Angel but it was made only with LIGHT. Reviving a Blossom then attacking it while in ATK with Zeal + Raging is always hilarious
Oh yeah I thought it was made with light and dark, if it’s made with just light, you can get raging phoenix to a higher attack then 3500 relatively easily
To be honest, i watch all the videos but only feel I need to comment on decks I also play and can add something but this will change from today (let's boost the algo) I get a bit salty when it's the opponent that loses the game and not you winning it, because there's nothing to learn from such games, but your commentary solves this issue giving valid feedback for the situation where otherwise I would just skip the video (for example on replay channels). I hope you understand what I mean. Starting with Bonds allows you to bait then do the main play using the normal summon while chainblocking Ash on the Synchro 8 when you don't have access to Gargoyle. It can also heavily punish an Imperm/Veiler/Ogre on Trudea by NS Primera or going straight for Stand Up (Oath as well but now you don't want to use it as starter). Bonds on Primera feels weak and doesn't help around Ash so it doesn't make much sense. And with that hand it would have been better to keep it for Stand Up's discard. Here they went straight to 12 instead of going for 8 to bait even more stuff, especially with Phalanx in GY, where a potential Atrii would have given them turn 1 Blazar. Unless you go "End of Main" there is no reason to make such plays, especially if Atrii isn't in rotation to dig for a handtrap. But even with Atrii it seems very desperate to go so early revealing a weak hand. These all already play into Talents, where Crimson can just target the stolen lvl12 synchro and give you Blazar anyway. About your use of Fiendsmith, I believe you would benefit more from Lars instead of Desirae. Having it as a FIRE target for Promethean into Raging is even more convenient and you lessen the extra deck demand while the recurring omni is Silvia anyway. This could allow you to opt for both Lars and Caesar if needed. About the Runick WF match, I would bet they were 99.9% going for Scourge and not Veiler. It's an answer to Evenly/Cosmic and Runick lacks S/T negation otherwise. From what I see most Runick WF builds shift to 2 Woes 1 Scourge so that Silvy isn't dead by turn 3. About ratios, I mostly see 3x both lvl4, 3 Elzette and rarely only a single Astellar.
Don’t ever think that you need to be pigeon holed into a certain subset of content. Then you will forever be known as the “white forest guy”, when you could be a valuable source of meta related content.
Nothing wrong with this.
Granted he is moving on from Ritual Beast, but JojosAsmr admitted he grew to genuinely love the deck because of the lore and artwork outside of being a strong meta contending deck, hence why he is one of the more renowned Ritual Beast players.
White Forest/Snake Eye is obviously strong, but also boasts an incredibly compelling lore/storyline as well as one of the better artworks in the game.
I enjoy videos like this. Honestly I’m not a great player and just hearing your thought process during matches helps a ton
Great commentary! Super insightful and I appreciated getting to see these decks performed on the other side of the table. Loved hearing the thought process behind your actions and trying to predict your opponent's plays! Keep it up!!
I always enjoy videos of people explaining their line of thinking during gameplay. I think it helps people learn how to be a better player in a more realistic way
8:50 he wouldnt be able to bystial the lurrie since you have no monsters. Just a small catch on what you said haha
If they vieller witch, you have normal oak, send it and witch to summon out ash and combo from there. Imp/talents/droplets are the only common outs without goddess- and setting imp isn’t a guaranteed strat since good players will attempt to out sets as they know your win con is a set imp resolving. Edit- another win you do have is dharc or hita summoning a body, and then using worldsea to give it back to them and inflicting 8k damage attacking into it
now that you say it the oak play is obvious - thanks! what do you mean by inflicting 8k by attacking the dharc/hiita body? wouldnt it die after the first attack?
@@BimYGO i assume they meant the battle protection of Chaos Angel but it was made only with LIGHT. Reviving a Blossom then attacking it while in ATK with Zeal + Raging is always hilarious
Oh yeah I thought it was made with light and dark, if it’s made with just light, you can get raging phoenix to a higher attack then 3500 relatively easily
To be honest, i watch all the videos but only feel I need to comment on decks I also play and can add something but this will change from today (let's boost the algo)
I get a bit salty when it's the opponent that loses the game and not you winning it, because there's nothing to learn from such games, but your commentary solves this issue giving valid feedback for the situation where otherwise I would just skip the video (for example on replay channels). I hope you understand what I mean.
Starting with Bonds allows you to bait then do the main play using the normal summon while chainblocking Ash on the Synchro 8 when you don't have access to Gargoyle. It can also heavily punish an Imperm/Veiler/Ogre on Trudea by NS Primera or going straight for Stand Up (Oath as well but now you don't want to use it as starter).
Bonds on Primera feels weak and doesn't help around Ash so it doesn't make much sense. And with that hand it would have been better to keep it for Stand Up's discard.
Here they went straight to 12 instead of going for 8 to bait even more stuff, especially with Phalanx in GY, where a potential Atrii would have given them turn 1 Blazar.
Unless you go "End of Main" there is no reason to make such plays, especially if Atrii isn't in rotation to dig for a handtrap. But even with Atrii it seems very desperate to go so early revealing a weak hand. These all already play into Talents, where Crimson can just target the stolen lvl12 synchro and give you Blazar anyway.
About your use of Fiendsmith, I believe you would benefit more from Lars instead of Desirae. Having it as a FIRE target for Promethean into Raging is even more convenient and you lessen the extra deck demand while the recurring omni is Silvia anyway. This could allow you to opt for both Lars and Caesar if needed.
About the Runick WF match, I would bet they were 99.9% going for Scourge and not Veiler. It's an answer to Evenly/Cosmic and Runick lacks S/T negation otherwise. From what I see most Runick WF builds shift to 2 Woes 1 Scourge so that Silvy isn't dead by turn 3. About ratios, I mostly see 3x both lvl4, 3 Elzette and rarely only a single Astellar.
Wp
i got scammed 😭