As someone who is rated at approximately this level, it's useful to see what was played (and what I honestly would probably have played) vs. what is the better move. I know you make these low rank videos more for entertainment, but I actually get a lot of value out of them. Thanks Levy!
Yeah I've actually hung that mate with the queen coming in on the back rank to H1 myself in games trying to protect another square with the king. You kind of get used to how safe your king is once castled with a Fianchetto bishop and its easy to forget that the king is the only protector of those squares....at least for me.
The true trial of low level chess is how many peices can be blundered and how many blunders are missed in comparison high level chess is how can gms do nothing until one of them makes the smallest of inaccuracies if no inaccuracies are made a quick draw
Their rating means nothing to them. In their minds they were fighting to the death with best moves every time. White went home after that win, smacked his wife on the tush, and opened a bottle of champagne. “Tonight, we celebrate!!!”
Thanks Levy! I'm pleasantly surprised that I not just won the GLE lottery but also featured in a standalone video! (I played white in this game) Few notes from what I can recall from my line of thinking, in case anyone was wondering (AMA!): - 5:32: I had some success in Scandinavian with this bishop and rook setup (usually winning a queen or something with a discovery) so I was tunnel visioned to clear e-file for the rook than anything else. - 7:09: I saw Rxb1 loses a2 pawn but Bxb1 can still protect so I went for it, didn't even look one step further after Qxa2, which ofc was the thing I was trying to do all along. - 11:37: Starting from here I missed most of black's queen backrank mate, wasn't aware that moving my bishop out is a way better idea. - 14:20: Believing black was doing some sort of rook sac idea that I didn't see, I decided to not give what they wanted, but I realized immediately after Qd8+ that was stupid 😂. I wonder if I recalled the rule of "2 more attacking pieces" at that moment I would see that was just a clear rook blunder. - 16:15: Can confirm, you won the million dollars. - 19:39: My brain isn't functioning, and I have this tendency of not giving what my opponent would obvious expect me to do. - 20:24: I just eyeballed that my king was more active, can probably stop those pawns after a queen trade, and I have queenside pawn majority, which was all an illusion. Have been struggling but I'm now motivated to put more efforts to not "fake learning", and review my course lines. Love your videos, keep it up! And/or find more success in your Chess career, whichever works better for you ;)
@@itayisme1 Thanks for the advice! I do more puzzles than actually playing games and find myself spotting tactics that does not work at all or being blind to what my opponent is doing. Noted, when in doubt, keep it simple!
@Hernando Malinche Aside from being glad that I won the game, and feel somewhat accomplished that I found a king move (eventually) that won the game, I know this is content when I review it XD. A bit horrified that I'm totally blind to those queen mates and the skewer in the end which I could have spotted in seconds if it's a puzzle. End of the game I'm happy there are still plenty of room for improvement that I can now see and act upon.
Learning by low elo players' mistakes make you improve way more than studying a gm. It is way harder to implement the playstyle from a gm than avoiding basic inaccuracies a 800 plays.
"Full Oooga-Booga mode!!" What a game!! Props to the sub who submitted this one! Been there. The comp score comes up, you review the game and 6 mistakes, 4 blunders, and 3 missed wins later you're muttering "what a stupid game". Next day you're at it again. Yep, been there. Great content - entertaining and fun!
i remember discovering chess 2 years ago when i was eight , now im 10 and ive learnt so much from gothamchess . im most likely around 900-1000 ELO and im trying to get better at chess so badly
I'm around 500 elo rn but this was worse than my games. I know it's easy to think I'm over estimating myself but I paused consistently trying to see what I would play and I spotted about 2 of the early checkmates. I don't think these guys were actually 700 elo.
@@bruceketta856 this! I created an account a week ago which was the first chess game ever played and it was a friendly game with my brother and lost 250 elo in a draw game lol
700 elo players with gotham : doesn't know en passant, doesn't see Mate in 1, blunder there queen and blunder mate 100 elo players with me : know en passant, see mate in 519 , know there openings , know double checks , legally 100M IQ
@SealedOrion it's all about how many games you play, and really it is circumstance. If you don't play as many games, you're more likely to face someone who knows the same lines you know. All it takes is one youtube video or one game review against a specific line.
I don't even play chess but I watch his videos because his narrating and explaining voice is very comforting. It feels like I know very niche stuff without knowing any opener whatsoever.
THIS IS FUNNY!! Good content Levy, I'm rated about 700 and have never laughed so hard. "The queen has 2 paths one is mate and the other picks up a pawn" 😂😂 I hope to see more of this!
It’s possible if the opponent doesn’t see it. At this elo level neither of them did. You can block the queen diagonal to f7 with bishop f5 to e6. The bishop would be protected by the pawns and checkmate could be denied.
@@frosty1865 800-900 is just a refined version of 700. 900s would be able to start seeing these mates in 2 to be fair. I know this as I was a 900, now a 1700. I ask myself was this really what I was lol?
These low elo series can help me alot!!!! I've actually starting to realize my mistakes because I also did these things in a real match. I guess I watch too much GM players that's why I'm stuck under 1000.
Personally me being a newer player, I'd move the other bishop to C5 or D6. The idea is as the game goes on it's attacking the king when not in real danger Hell even doing G4 a block down threatens their bishop/queen if they move the knight. Hell as he points out it lets the knight retake or drive in when it would be a much more questionable move if the bishop with threatening real pieces if the knife moved.
I had a Mr Singh at my high school. He was the coolest teacher ever. I’d turn up to class stoned and so would he and we would greet each other awkwardly knowing what we were up to
There is no duality there tho? In first one he is complimenting white and in the second one he is saying white is winning meaning it made sense? Or am i missing something i am probably missing something
Three stages of a 300 Elo game: (1) opening: normal moves, (2) middle game: chaos breaks out, (3) endgame: the player with the material lead blows the game.
This is making me realize how important being strong at openings are, I’m at like 500 and I instantly saw the mate in 2 and I would do a lot of the moves you mention after the opening, but I am just awful at openings
Actually gotham these types of videos are more educational than how to win episodes for low elo players cause these teaches us how to not make blunders.. I hope you continue these videos
I think it would be an interesting idea to also feature games where people around this rating (500-1300) play really high level games. That’s what’s so great about some of these guys: they can play atrocious games but also really good ones.
Rapid is 10min each - The blunders in this are frankly disgusting by "GM" players - I personally question the title of those players. No GM should be ELO'd at 700 imo unless maybe blitz or bullet...
14:13 yeah, it's not a mouse-slip. It's definitely an extra attack on the bishop while forgetting that pawns can be a threat. Happens quite a lot to some people. :">
the beauty of the last 5ish moves of the game... is that i can very clearly see white maybe suddenly going "OH. I ALMOST HAD IT. Let's repeat and hope they do too? YES I WIN" but I can ALSO see the win being a total accident
Let's get real. White didn't actually win, but players repeated moves for a draw. Levy just doesn't want to lose his audience because of the possible seizures of the people witnessing that moves
No, it's very likely white accidentally won this by moving his king forward. Black took about 30 seconds to find their only move frantically trying to move the king first and white was like "oooh me likey he blundered his queen".
yeah same i defeated my dad by accident, when i looked at my knight not knowing that blocking the f7 square and rook on e8 checkmate without my knowing and not planning it.
The fact that I tried to watch this video during a class, while everyone was doing quiet independent work and he went oooga booga and I just lost it. The word choice. Love your videos man. You make chess funny and enjoyable even for complex and hard the game is.
It is funny how embarrassing USA culture is that you can't even put something on the profile picture that is not disgusting.
pin of accuracy
Pin of shame!
That doesn't even make sense🤨
Your either a hater or a hustler
What do you mean by that?????
"When there is mate in one, look for a better move"
En passent
@@四方八方 a cultured member of the Anarchy Chess community
@@四方八方 holy hell
Yeah apparently LOL
I want that on a t-shirt
Im a 500 ELO and sometimes the way we win is that we just kinda wander into checkmates
i can vouch for this
800, also vouching for this
680-ish and I vouch for this as well.
Swear to god sometimes I just try to make good positions for my pieces and get a checkmate by accident
I'm a 500 Elo and blunder 11 times in a match
As someone who is rated at approximately this level, it's useful to see what was played (and what I honestly would probably have played) vs. what is the better move. I know you make these low rank videos more for entertainment, but I actually get a lot of value out of them. Thanks Levy!
Yes. As a 900+ myself I find this so helpful
Yeah I've actually hung that mate with the queen coming in on the back rank to H1 myself in games trying to protect another square with the king. You kind of get used to how safe your king is once castled with a Fianchetto bishop and its easy to forget that the king is the only protector of those squares....at least for me.
As an 1800 myself I would love this
Same, I'm 800 and learn a lot of the basics and I laugh.
I never played these kind of games, probably because I resign as soon as I blunder a fork
low elo chess is like war, but the tactician is incredibly drunk
and or high... Speaking from experience.
“Just one more glass…”
and under 200 is just fun
High elo chess is like war, but everyone thinks that the tactician is incredibly drunk, until he cluthes
@@hellomoney333when im high i play better
I would learn so much if Gotham critiqued my game but i would also cry
Im 400 elo but I'm still way better than these caveman people for some reason
Me on gotham's channel: "ha ha that Guy he's talking about is so dumb" me playing: "NOW, HOW DID I NOT SEE THAT BISHOP"
literally me
@@gandalf_the_purplewithredd2057 fr I be blind sometimes
@@doby8544 Well than maybe you shouldn't be blind. Use your eyes.
Low elo chess is surprisingly more entertaining than high elo chess
Agreed
It's the same in any competition, if you don't know what will happen it's more interesting.
The sheer absurdity of the game (and the reaction to it) is priceless, definitely.
Funniest thing is I'll probably replicate it in my games too.
Gotta give credit to Levy though.
@@moderndayvampire1469 Very much this
"OOOOH! Me, Attack Rook!"
I've never felt so attacked and I'm not even a rook.
That’s me going for a bishop check at the beginning of the game 💀
@@bigbuffoilymengoofy ahh💀
I laughed soo hard on that one🤣🤣🤣
@@altin7239 me too 🤣
I was dying
As 200 ELO this makes me feel good
Same but I'm 400 now
I guarantee you would lose to either of them 10 times out of 10
Same but i went from 200ish to 600ish so far
@@filthyfrank.5 nah, with the knowledge provided by this video he would snatch a victory in 3 at least.
I’m 500 elo and I beat the 1200 bot lmao
4:26 I LOVE THIS PART 😂
"you do well for the first 7 moves and then ooga booga kicks in"
- GothamChess
"black goes full ooga booga mode" - Levi Rosman
The funny part is that the two players are actually insanely intensed in this match like a match btw Hikaru and Magnus
Everyone was so focused on high level chess gameplay, it's really the lowest level chess gameplay that we wanna see
High level chess has become a contest of who can memorise the most engine moves. Low level chess is a contest of how many engine moves you can avoid
i dont
The true trial of low level chess is how many peices can be blundered and how many blunders are missed in comparison high level chess is how can gms do nothing until one of them makes the smallest of inaccuracies if no inaccuracies are made a quick draw
Very much! Pog champs ftw!
@@gabrielvilchesalves6406 so true we don't want grand masters play we want to watch minor masters play
Their rating means nothing to them. In their minds they were fighting to the death with best moves every time. White went home after that win, smacked his wife on the tush, and opened a bottle of champagne. “Tonight, we celebrate!!!”
Most accurate desciption of low elo chess
gotta love the accuracy of this comment
True story.
As long as they don't look at the analysis, that's where I go wrong
hell yeah that's how we do it!
Nice timestamps Gotham. Really gotta love the intensity of the Magnus-Hikaru game
Now there are no more timestamps. He killed them
@@RasburryTe RIP
are you dumb?
@@namanchhibbbar2205 no he's sarcastic
@@RasburryTe I still see them
I started playing chess yesterday and on my first game did only 13 blunders so I'm chillin
i started today and in my first game i got checkmated in 8 moves
@@juliuscaesarballshahah1228 💀
Ooga booga mode
@@juliuscaesarballshahah1228truly a fried liver moment
i made 16 blunders and still won, you can probably guess my elo from this 😂
7:20 is single handedly your best joke ever.
Levy: You ever win a game by accident?
Me an insomniac playing at 3am: OH yeah its all coming tog-wait I won?
My 3am games go more like "Oh yeah it's all coming tog-wait I lost?" Lmao 😭
@@ElijahStormblessed haha yeah that's what happens 90% of the time with me too
@@ElijahStormblessed Same LMAO XD
most of the time I'm like: look at those 3 great moves, I won, it would have been awesome if I had that figured out before moving randomly
ME LOLLLLL
Thanks Levy! I'm pleasantly surprised that I not just won the GLE lottery but also featured in a standalone video! (I played white in this game)
Few notes from what I can recall from my line of thinking, in case anyone was wondering (AMA!):
- 5:32: I had some success in Scandinavian with this bishop and rook setup (usually winning a queen or something with a discovery) so I was tunnel visioned to clear e-file for the rook than anything else.
- 7:09: I saw Rxb1 loses a2 pawn but Bxb1 can still protect so I went for it, didn't even look one step further after Qxa2, which ofc was the thing I was trying to do all along.
- 11:37: Starting from here I missed most of black's queen backrank mate, wasn't aware that moving my bishop out is a way better idea.
- 14:20: Believing black was doing some sort of rook sac idea that I didn't see, I decided to not give what they wanted, but I realized immediately after Qd8+ that was stupid 😂. I wonder if I recalled the rule of "2 more attacking pieces" at that moment I would see that was just a clear rook blunder.
- 16:15: Can confirm, you won the million dollars.
- 19:39: My brain isn't functioning, and I have this tendency of not giving what my opponent would obvious expect me to do.
- 20:24: I just eyeballed that my king was more active, can probably stop those pawns after a queen trade, and I have queenside pawn majority, which was all an illusion.
Have been struggling but I'm now motivated to put more efforts to not "fake learning", and review my course lines.
Love your videos, keep it up! And/or find more success in your Chess career, whichever works better for you ;)
The man himself
The long awaited one
Great game man, as a 2000 I highly recommend you, make simple thought, complexity will come neutrally along. On that level, just take free pieces
@@itayisme1 Thanks for the advice! I do more puzzles than actually playing games and find myself spotting tactics that does not work at all or being blind to what my opponent is doing. Noted, when in doubt, keep it simple!
@Hernando Malinche Aside from being glad that I won the game, and feel somewhat accomplished that I found a king move (eventually) that won the game, I know this is content when I review it XD. A bit horrified that I'm totally blind to those queen mates and the skewer in the end which I could have spotted in seconds if it's a puzzle. End of the game I'm happy there are still plenty of room for improvement that I can now see and act upon.
16:53 This is the definition of “when you have mate in 1, look for better”
I really need to find more 700s like this lol, I’m at 600 but I’ve never seen a 19 blunder game, 2-4 each is normal
@kikilaker6698yea, he has to be scraping the bottom of the barrel to find 700 elo games with all these blunders. Agreed
Such a good story! Felt like I was watching a movie!
Literally didn't ask
@@chrisdawson1776 I did
@@chrisdawson1776 I did
@@chrisdawson1776 i did
@@chrisdawson1776 i did
Learning by low elo players' mistakes make you improve way more than studying a gm. It is way harder to implement the playstyle from a gm than avoiding basic inaccuracies a 800 plays.
what are you talking about. They are GM‘s
@@malarius7390 Yes but being able to see blunders is easier and more fundamental than being a super GM
GMs of blunders.
Great point..
Imagine them drawing and both being like. That was a high level game.
Perfectly played chess always ends in a draw
20:53 almost broke my heart when i heard it was gonna be a draw. but thank god that was only a joke
This is really interesting to watch when you're 700 Elo. The whole match I was like "But how could that have been a better move?!"
i almost died laughing at this commentary
Saaaaaame
i fell out of my chair
"What an intense game! I can't wait to show Levy how well we both played for people of such low ELO!" *gets roasted to oblivion*
It’s like people warning you to not open something but you open it anyway and you get punched in the face with a jack-in-the-box prank.
@@askinnyshademan Pandora’s box
@@yourmomreacts3734seriously? -_-
2:02 The amount of times ive lost my bishop like that is more than my ELO.
"Full Oooga-Booga mode!!" What a game!! Props to the sub who submitted this one! Been there. The comp score comes up, you review the game and 6 mistakes, 4 blunders, and 3 missed wins later you're muttering "what a stupid game". Next day you're at it again. Yep, been there. Great content - entertaining and fun!
i remember discovering chess 2 years ago when i was eight , now im 10 and ive learnt so much from gothamchess . im most likely around 900-1000 ELO and im trying to get better at chess so badly
You're 10?
I'm around 500 elo rn but this was worse than my games. I know it's easy to think I'm over estimating myself but I paused consistently trying to see what I would play and I spotted about 2 of the early checkmates. I don't think these guys were actually 700 elo.
🤣
Probably they both had a new account, that must be why their Elo's so high
@@bruceketta856 this! I created an account a week ago which was the first chess game ever played and it was a friendly game with my brother and lost 250 elo in a draw game lol
Same lmao my highest is 530 elo and trust me this played worse than me
A bad but a very real 800 elo game. We always look dumber when we zoom out
700 elo players with gotham : doesn't know en passant, doesn't see Mate in 1, blunder there queen and blunder mate
100 elo players with me : know en passant, see mate in 519 , know there openings , know double checks , legally 100M IQ
@SealedOrion it's all about how many games you play, and really it is circumstance. If you don't play as many games, you're more likely to face someone who knows the same lines you know. All it takes is one youtube video or one game review against a specific line.
@SealedOrion im legit rated 1200 in blitz and I still get players with 800 elo and still beat me lol
I know that feeling all too well...I'm always wondering where all these easy wins are.
@SealedOrion their*
@SealedOrion nah man this video is obviously on the extreme side but
Chess humor at it's finest. The world needs more videos like this. It's funny because it's true, and because I'd have made many of those moves.
I'm 800 and I'm happy with myself that I saw that mate in 2 at 5:50
The funniest thing is I thought most of the 700 elo moves before they made it cause I would do it only to be ridiculed how stupid I am
The queen moving one space at 16:00 instead of checkmate is something I’ll never forget
I don't even play chess but I watch his videos because his narrating and explaining voice is very comforting.
It feels like I know very niche stuff without knowing any opener whatsoever.
Are we all just ignoring the devastating burn at 16:39?
🤣🤣
damn
I was so disappointed nobody else picked up on that
THIS IS FUNNY!!
Good content Levy, I'm rated about 700 and have never laughed so hard.
"The queen has 2 paths one is mate and the other picks up a pawn" 😂😂
I hope to see more of this!
for real my abs burn from this video, there's something about noob chess players that is so funny
5:30 check mate is possible with Qb3
It’s possible if the opponent doesn’t see it. At this elo level neither of them did. You can block the queen diagonal to f7 with bishop f5 to e6. The bishop would be protected by the pawns and checkmate could be denied.
10:59 “because you put the stupid bishop here” I’m dead!!!!
I just surpassed 800 and now this makes me feel like i should be 1500 lol
Im 520 but 800 to 1000 seem like gods
@@frosty1865 800-900 is just a refined version of 700. 900s would be able to start seeing these mates in 2 to be fair. I know this as I was a 900, now a 1700. I ask myself was this really what I was lol?
2:10 "This is why you don't premove your opening" Flashback to yesterday's GC clip
I did that one time and my opponent took the e5 pawn instead of my bishop (London)😅
"Checks, captures, attacks" - good for a clean 200 point boost.
4:11 "You're gonna need that skill for other things in life"
16:38 "I'm in the minority on that one"
I’m am approximately 1,300 and if a 700 to 800 played , Queen D1 I would’ve start suspecting too 😂
"I am wearing black today because I feel like I am attending a chess funeral"😭 0:57
Classic Levy🤣🤣🤣
could have been a black hoodie:)
@@chessman88 Spot-on🏆
3:29 "This is definitely the best move" *eval bar starts going down
I actually looked at this position with Stockfish myself, and it said that d4 is the best move.
I love the way the eval bar keeps swinging from one end to the other every 2nd move
I’m not here for the game I’m here for the reaction
I love how he just slips in jokes about lasting 4 minutes💀
These low elo series can help me alot!!!! I've actually starting to realize my mistakes because I also did these things in a real match.
I guess I watch too much GM players that's why I'm stuck under 1000.
Thank you for the timestamps! Really useful. Grandelius - Pichot was a blast!
The eval bar was giving a nice visualization of Levy´s heartrate while presenting this game
Personally me being a newer player, I'd move the other bishop to C5 or D6. The idea is as the game goes on it's attacking the king when not in real danger Hell even doing G4 a block down threatens their bishop/queen if they move the knight.
Hell as he points out it lets the knight retake or drive in when it would be a much more questionable move if the bishop with threatening real pieces if the knife moved.
I had a Mr Singh at my high school. He was the coolest teacher ever. I’d turn up to class stoned and so would he and we would greet each other awkwardly knowing what we were up to
5:25
7:55
10:45
Me being a 400 (who blunders queens often and also finds brilliant moves): "wait, even I saw that for white"
16:35 chess players not mating where have I heard that one before 😂
3:02: "I love the way white is handling this position"
3:09: "I hate this, white is now completely winning"
the duality of chess. Love it.
There is no duality there tho?
In first one he is complimenting white and in the second one he is saying white is winning meaning it made sense?
Or am i missing something i am probably missing something
@@ranjanasharan4051 no, you're right lol this comment makes no sense
@@wunknownbeatbox7980 ah thanks for confirming it
@@ranjanasharan4051 He mento said that now black are very much wonning.
@@dxshawn532 pretty sure that isn't what they meant to say cos then the word duality won't be used
8:52 deez knights🤣🤣🤣
Three stages of a 300 Elo game: (1) opening: normal moves, (2) middle game: chaos breaks out, (3) endgame: the player with the material lead blows the game.
You got to love the fact you named the games after grandmasters
14:45 Just take the rook Scoob
Man i haven‘t laughed this hard in quite some while haha
*goes back to getting mated in 2*
“You want to avoid having the king and queen on the same diagonal” *demonstrates a “better” move by putting king on the same diagonal as the queen*
"No 700 plays that". Me who forcefully makes myself 700 to troll all low elo players
This is making me realize how important being strong at openings are, I’m at like 500 and I instantly saw the mate in 2 and I would do a lot of the moves you mention after the opening, but I am just awful at openings
Overload tactics are not easy to see, that one was the least beginner level blunder of the game
The truly funny thing is this is what GM level chess looks like to Stockfish.
The truly funny thing is this is what Stockfish level chess looks like to Alphazero
Actually gotham these types of videos are more educational than how to win episodes for low elo players cause these teaches us how to not make blunders.. I hope you continue these videos
I imagine Stockfish has developed depression from watching all these games.
I think it would be an interesting idea to also feature games where people around this rating (500-1300) play really high level games. That’s what’s so great about some of these guys: they can play atrocious games but also really good ones.
At 500 elo I played a game at 93% and never since
many people play in 95 percent accuracy even in 1000 rating
16:36 “both sides can mate each other but nobody wants to do it”
pretty much sums up my love life
4:18 I'm dead 💀💀
I think I'd miss a lot too when it comes to being pressured by time (rapid chess).
Rapid is 10min each - The blunders in this are frankly disgusting by "GM" players - I personally question the title of those players. No GM should be ELO'd at 700 imo unless maybe blitz or bullet...
@@scottspeig he added it as a joke
NAAHH THAT OOGA BOOGA ROOK GOT ME
14:13 yeah, it's not a mouse-slip. It's definitely an extra attack on the bishop while forgetting that pawns can be a threat. Happens quite a lot to some people. :">
4:27 Lmaoooo🤣🤣🤣🤣
I would love to hear the subscriber who played this game explain themself, cause this game is one of the most brilliant things I have ever seen
They're a comment or two above you now and they added timestamps.
at 13:44 is a really good play because its mate when you move the rook up'
“when i have 15 queens I should turn them to pawns”
4:13 "i don't think I will"
11:51 I am a proud 770 elo player for spotting Qd1 immediately
191st day of translating Levy's titles into Neapolitan: "E scacc re 700 elo è assurd"
I am just a quarter of a second faster lol, GG
@@afraid2letgo that was fast, GG
the beauty of the last 5ish moves of the game... is that i can very clearly see white maybe suddenly going "OH. I ALMOST HAD IT. Let's repeat and hope they do too? YES I WIN" but I can ALSO see the win being a total accident
Levy failing for over 16 minutes to FINALLY come up with a mating pun is almost as much of a blunder as the stuff we saw on the board XD
As someone rightly said ' When you players plays a perfect game it's mostly a draw'.
2:04 This actually a well known chess opening, it's called "the Londun gambit".
Well known opening where you go -4.5 in first 2 moves ... Sounds completely reasonable
Players who play London should get good... Accelerated London is where it's at.
@@knownasezio4421 he is clearly joking
The funniest part of this video for me (a 700) is I’m literally making the same mistakes in my head as I try to analyze as Jav did lol
As a 200, 13:37 was actually M1, you don’t throw rook for a check there, just move ur queen into that spot the pawn created and it’s mate
13:45 The eyes of disappointment 😐
I skipped to the magnus timestamp just to see 700 elo magnus endgame
That eval bar going up and down had me dying xD
Let's get real.
White didn't actually win, but players repeated moves for a draw.
Levy just doesn't want to lose his audience because of the possible seizures of the people witnessing that moves
For real. I have to watch guess the Elo in small doses because I just cannot even...
No, it's very likely white accidentally won this by moving his king forward. Black took about 30 seconds to find their only move frantically trying to move the king first and white was like "oooh me likey he blundered his queen".
@@NeverEverClever You know hes joking right?
@@ppmpyae1152 no. people always mean exactly what they post in a youtube comment section.
@@NeverEverClever Nice joke. Very funny
yeah same i defeated my dad by accident, when i looked at my knight not knowing that blocking the f7 square and rook on e8 checkmate without my knowing and not planning it.
The fact that I tried to watch this video during a class, while everyone was doing quiet independent work and he went oooga booga and I just lost it. The word choice. Love your videos man. You make chess funny and enjoyable even for complex and hard the game is.
2 GM in a match.. What a match man well played guys!
That "White here goes:oh my! I haven't blundering in several moves"
Part was just great
Day 355.75 of translating Levy's titles to Russian: "Шахматы с рейтингом 700 безумны!"
Now an Indian guy thanking you in hindi.... बहुत बहुत शुक्रिया आपका
Comment history doesn’t lie
@@memetos9375 yeah, I now have like 1100+ comments or something, and about 700 on Gotham City I think, and that's insane
Хорош)
Я русский и перевод скорее такой: Безумные шахматы 700 рейтинга
Так просто покрасивее, но оригинал тоже отличный
this only makes me confident about my games