This is how I view nature 7:12. Universe has to be a fractal. Each level is a classical theory, possesing its own "speed of light". The smaller the details - the faster the speed. Level is obtained by coarse-graining another one. It can be most easily seen from hydrodynamic quantum analogs.
Bohm and Krishnamurti had entirely different backgrounds, one (B) educated through traditional mainstream principles and the other (K) who was an original exponent of self-knowing via negation, but not forming conclusions which sounds rather weird. Nevertheless, what surfaces via negation is the ground or essence of relationships at every level of the living psychological perspective of human beings. Bohm was instrumental in bringing forth the intelligence of Krishnamurti’s ‘teachings’ in logical and reasoning terms that ordinary people could understand. It is unclear whether Bohm was responsible for altering the essential aspects of what Krishnamurti was alluding to, but he certainly assisted in the clarity of the explanation which was sometimes a bit vague at first sight. However, the ‘real’ was always latent and just needed to be teased out and Bohm performed that function admirably.
Exacto, muy acertado la referencia que haces con respecto a la autoindagacion de Krishnamurti, ahora bien, creo que si estas atento, y escuchas en el sentido que decia, "no, tu escuchar", solo escuchar, no hay ninguna dificultad en entenderlo, Bohn si ayudo a intelectualizarlo?, a hacerlo mas facil comprenderlo?, es muy posible, pero digo que es tan sencillo lo que sobre el vivir señala Krishnamurti que lo dificil es no entenderlo, no quisiera ser pretencioso al decir esto, fijense por favor. Un gran saludo.
Sabine Hossenfelder recently put a video attacking people who dare to propose any link between QM and Consciousness. She thinks that after ridiculing popular in scientific culture strew man : Telepathy and Deepak Chopra People will automatically start to treat her Superderminism as the only reasonable alternative. Seven years ago it would certainly work: but now after Quantum Entanglement spooky Action Nobel Prize and recent Stuart Hameroffs August 2022 papers she's in position little better than Flat Earthers with her Superderminism! But I also hope Realism will be saved in some way nevertheless. David Bohm was so incredible!
Sabine enjoys being a 'contrarian'. But consciousness and physics are inextricably linked, so much has been written about this. You cannot write it off so easily.
My 2 favorite physicists
I have a terrific book by this wonderful writer! Never seen him before. Very happy for this video. Great stuff.
which book?
@@lokeshparihar7672 "Superstrings and the search for the theory of everything" published by Cardinal books in 1988.
This is how I view nature 7:12. Universe has to be a fractal. Each level is a classical theory, possesing its own "speed of light". The smaller the details - the faster the speed. Level is obtained by coarse-graining another one. It can be most easily seen from hydrodynamic quantum analogs.
Bohm and Krishnamurti had entirely different backgrounds, one (B) educated through traditional mainstream principles and the other (K) who was an original exponent of self-knowing via negation, but not forming conclusions which sounds rather weird. Nevertheless, what surfaces via negation is the ground or essence of relationships at every level of the living psychological perspective of human beings. Bohm was instrumental in bringing forth the intelligence of Krishnamurti’s ‘teachings’ in logical and reasoning terms that ordinary people could understand. It is unclear whether Bohm was responsible for altering the essential aspects of what Krishnamurti was alluding to, but he certainly assisted in the clarity of the explanation which was sometimes a bit vague at first sight. However, the ‘real’ was always latent and just needed to be teased out and Bohm performed that function admirably.
Thank you sir for your comment. I think your assessment here is very accurate.
Exacto, muy acertado la referencia que haces con respecto a la autoindagacion de Krishnamurti, ahora bien, creo que si estas atento, y escuchas en el sentido que decia, "no, tu escuchar", solo escuchar, no hay ninguna dificultad en entenderlo, Bohn si ayudo a intelectualizarlo?, a hacerlo mas facil comprenderlo?, es muy posible, pero digo que es tan sencillo lo que sobre el vivir señala Krishnamurti que lo dificil es no entenderlo, no quisiera ser pretencioso al decir esto, fijense por favor.
Un gran saludo.
Sabine Hossenfelder recently put a video attacking people who dare to propose any link between QM and Consciousness. She thinks that after ridiculing popular in scientific culture strew man : Telepathy and Deepak Chopra
People will automatically start to treat her Superderminism as the only reasonable alternative.
Seven years ago it would certainly work: but now after Quantum Entanglement spooky Action Nobel Prize and recent Stuart Hameroffs August 2022 papers she's in position little better than Flat Earthers with her Superderminism!
But I also hope Realism will be saved in some way nevertheless.
David Bohm was so incredible!
Sabine enjoys being a 'contrarian'. But consciousness and physics are inextricably linked, so much has been written about this. You cannot write it off so easily.
empirical science does NOT have all the answers however snarky they may be
@@drink.juice.
Que bueno!!, es muy importante hacer divertido todo esto, es tan sumamente importante.
Who is 'unconditioned Brian'? ;-)
Unconditioned Brian is a painter and decorator from Cheam. He famously uses shampoo but flat out refuses to use conditioner. The fool.
Remember reading his 'Einstein's Moon'. But the cover says F. David Peat?
😍 Ｐ𝐫Ｏ𝕞Ｏ𝓢ｍ