I am admirer of David Bohm...I am from UCH UCL London...I discovered scientific structure of consciousness with sub Quantum structure. I have got the scientific proof of Consciousness and Infinity
admiring David Böhm instead of experiencing what he talked about, is making him a Saint. In this, I am 'happy' they didn't mention the Love which Truth really is, and leave 'the speaker' which JK presented to David in so many conversations out of the conversation being held here. After all, it wouldn't fit among the materialists, scientists or not. :-)
Thank you for your comment. It's true that David Bohm and Jiddu Krishnamurti had a profound intellectual relationship and influenced each other's work considerably. However, it's worth noting that while Bohm drew significant inspiration from Krishnamurti, his contributions to the fields of physics and philosophy are also grounded in his own academic background and personal insights. Their dialogues certainly enriched both of their perspectives, creating a synergy that added depth and nuance to their individual philosophies. Would you agree that the beauty of such intellectual friendships lies in the mutual exchange and growth?
I wonder when a person sees the enfolded reality, whether it, then, becomes impossible to unsee it? However, Bohm did say, that enfolded realities never end and that, a human being will never reach/see the ultimate reality. Again, why must reality hide itself so? Since we are inside this reality maybe we can never see it objectively? Is the lesson, stay human and do not try to be omniscient? Bohm once remarked that he had always assumed that science was supposed to better humanity. He then laughed at himself and said that that was never the case! So, if man's goal in science is conquest, reality rebuffs science? Maybe, if man viewed reality differently, he would think differently and understand it better? I say that, because I find cosmologists and scientists in general ( I am a scientist) cold and objective with all emphasis on logic and no humility/humanness. They don't really care if science does or does not "serve" the public - they are cold-eyed and focused on conquering the working of nature.
Nice one.
What do you know about morphic resonance i notice Bohm answered a question it is true no more detail surrounding the answer..
Excellent interview, I thank you both from my ❤.
Thank you Ena, much appreciated!
I love everything about this conversation!! Thank you ❣️🙏
Thank you Kri, very glad you enjoyed it!
I’m on my 3rd time listening to this! I don’t want the video to end! 😅🌟
Great content. Thank you
Nice interview great job :)
Thank you! :)
Producing science and spirituality without the need to consume them may be the key to avoid what is coming?
I am admirer of David Bohm...I am from UCH UCL London...I discovered scientific structure of consciousness with sub Quantum structure. I have got the scientific proof of Consciousness and Infinity
Who is the observer who observes doc.
Where is your peer reviewed paper on that？
🤡
❤️
I watched IP at a Birkbeck alumni event.
I asked Paul a question as to whether Bohm took psychedelics or not?
It was a no lol.
Not a single mention of Jiddu Krishnamurti. Hmmm. Little peculiar
admiring David Böhm instead of experiencing what he talked about, is making him a Saint.
In this, I am 'happy' they didn't mention the Love which Truth really is, and leave 'the speaker' which JK presented to David in so many conversations out of the conversation being held here.
After all, it wouldn't fit among the materialists, scientists or not. :-)
Krishnamurti made Bohm aware of the observer who is observing everything...
everything David bohm speaks about is his learning from Jiddu Krishnamurthi
Not exactly.. that's a very limited conclusion
Thank you for your comment. It's true that David Bohm and Jiddu Krishnamurti had a profound intellectual relationship and influenced each other's work considerably. However, it's worth noting that while Bohm drew significant inspiration from Krishnamurti, his contributions to the fields of physics and philosophy are also grounded in his own academic background and personal insights. Their dialogues certainly enriched both of their perspectives, creating a synergy that added depth and nuance to their individual philosophies. Would you agree that the beauty of such intellectual friendships lies in the mutual exchange and growth?
@@scienceandwisdomlivewonderfully said 🙏
I wonder when a person sees the enfolded reality, whether it, then, becomes impossible to unsee it? However, Bohm did say, that enfolded realities never end and that, a human being will never reach/see the ultimate reality. Again, why must reality hide itself so? Since we are inside this reality maybe we can never see it objectively? Is the lesson, stay human and do not try to be omniscient? Bohm once remarked that he had always assumed that science was supposed to better humanity. He then laughed at himself and said that that was never the case! So, if man's goal in science is conquest, reality rebuffs science? Maybe, if man viewed reality differently, he would think differently and understand it better? I say that, because I find cosmologists and scientists in general ( I am a scientist) cold and objective with all emphasis on logic and no humility/humanness. They don't really care if science does or does not "serve" the public - they are cold-eyed and focused on conquering the working of nature.