Group drums and add compressor and saturator. Then parallel compression - Create a return track and saturate it, or you can use a compressor. EQ high pass to leave just per and hats. Then mix in with the drum group. Make them brighter and wider by creating another return track - Heavy compression and add erosion white noise and another erosion sine. EQ again leaving high end. Another EQ to boast mid to highs. Then blend again using sends. Another return - Copy the plugins used on the first return. Pan first one to left and new second one to the right. Blend them all until louder and heavy drums at the same db level.
Lmao, u guys aint Ableton'ing right. Making return tracks? No. How about grouping your drum effects as multiple chains (saturator, parallel, high parallel, panned, et c.) on your drum group, then blend. There's literally no reason to make a return track.
@@bennyfairfax1 Not exactly. its adding steps. sure u can buy a car so u can trade it in to buy a truck, but why not just buy a truck to begin with? If u just add your effects to your drum channel and blend, u dont have to make a return track (for each effecT!!), and that saves u time. of course there are some that will argue the "precision" of using a return track fader vs the blend knob, and if ur ears are actually that delicate, then go ahead. But Im arguing time over precision.
@@wwlittlejOfficial it does the same thing but there is one particular thing that probably help decide what benefits the workflow. Are you gonna use the same effects you are making for other parts of the song? Go for a return track. Are you only going to use this particular effect on a specific track? Group the effect on the track and make parallel processing that way. No right or wrong. Just a matter of temper and efficiency. I use my background in programming for these types of decisions - more specific local or global variables. Am I going to use is JUST there or can I benefit from it elsewhere as well. :-)
Thank you for your vid. Instead of sending to Return track, why not using an effect rack directly into the drums group? Does Return tracks affect the signal differently?
Hi mate, great tutorials. Quick question, I see you have A/B at the bottom of your channels and a slider I reckon that responds to the A/B . Can I ask what plug-in/vst did you use to achieve that. Thanks!
Group drums and add compressor and saturator. Then parallel compression - Create a return track and saturate it, or you can use a compressor. EQ high pass to leave just per and hats. Then mix in with the drum group. Make them brighter and wider by creating another return track - Heavy compression and add erosion white noise and another erosion sine. EQ again leaving high end. Another EQ to boast mid to highs. Then blend again using sends. Another return - Copy the plugins used on the first return. Pan first one to left and new second one to the right. Blend them all until louder and heavy drums at the same db level.
Absolutely :)
Lmao, u guys aint Ableton'ing right. Making return tracks? No. How about grouping your drum effects as multiple chains (saturator, parallel, high parallel, panned, et c.) on your drum group, then blend. There's literally no reason to make a return track.
@@wwlittlejOfficial is it not just a different way of getting the same result?
@@bennyfairfax1 Not exactly. its adding steps. sure u can buy a car so u can trade it in to buy a truck, but why not just buy a truck to begin with? If u just add your effects to your drum channel and blend, u dont have to make a return track (for each effecT!!), and that saves u time.
of course there are some that will argue the "precision" of using a return track fader vs the blend knob, and if ur ears are actually that delicate, then go ahead. But Im arguing time over precision.
@@wwlittlejOfficial it does the same thing but there is one particular thing that probably help decide what benefits the workflow. Are you gonna use the same effects you are making for other parts of the song? Go for a return track. Are you only going to use this particular effect on a specific track? Group the effect on the track and make parallel processing that way.
No right or wrong. Just a matter of temper and efficiency. I use my background in programming for these types of decisions - more specific local or global variables. Am I going to use is JUST there or can I benefit from it elsewhere as well. :-)
This was so amazing and helpful. Thank you!!
Yay!!! ❤️
Bro great video and channel.. thanks a lot !
OMG! Thank you mate
Thank you for your vid. Instead of sending to Return track, why not using an effect rack directly into the drums group? Does Return tracks affect the signal differently?
Yes, that is absolutely same, both ways do the same job it’s just a matter of a habit
OKay thanks for the answer @@undergroundbeats7877
YES! Drums matter!
Indeed!!
Amazing video, thanks!
Thanks man! Great video :)
Thank you for watching it!
Very nice!
Thanks Daniel, try this on your own tracks ;)
@@undergroundbeats7877 I will👍
Do you only send the kick or the other drums too?
Can you please make a video tutorial in the style of Potobolo Records minimal tech ( artists like Ron Costa, Lewis, Matt Sassari)
Thanks Bjon, i will check these guys! 💪
@@undergroundbeats7877 Thank you so much! This is my favorite type of tech house and have been trying to figure it out!
OMG YEAH!!!
check out Ron Costa - YURS , probly my all time favorite peak timer
Thanks master :)
Enjoy my friend :)
Simply amazing:)
Whats the purpose of using erosion here? And why double up?
It’s for some texture and to highlight the transients ;)
It’s a great basement that can be taken further. Nice one :)
try it out! Many thanks :)
is this project available as i want to use those sends for a personal template
I need to check if i trash’ed it, will let you know ;)
@@undergroundbeats7877 cheers mate
Hi mate, great tutorials. Quick question, I see you have A/B at the bottom of your channels and a slider I reckon that responds to the A/B . Can I ask what plug-in/vst did you use to achieve that. Thanks!
Hey, thank you ;) The A/B pops up when you create return track’s (same way you create audio or midi track)
How on earth would you achieve this in fl studio. Daw only really has send tracks no returns??!
I dont know how to do that in fl studio, unfortunately… switch to Ableton! 😀
you can do it, i used to work on fl , you could do it by creating a drumbuss and then adding an effect chain on your mixer if i remember correctly.
why are my return tracks not playing anything?
Make sure to increase the amount of send on your tracks :)
@@undergroundbeats7877 it seems like it made everything sound more muffled and static after the tutorial. any reason why?
gratidão
❤️
Pls make a track from scratch beeyou style