@@boneymic2.04 How so? Because mobile games don’t have advanced textures, tessellation, sun spots, ambient occlusion, volumetric lighting, reflections, and realistic smoke.
I like the detail both games have when reloading shotguns like the Remington you can see the player pushing the shell in which you're supposed to do instead of just halfass sliding it into the tube magazine.
The point is to avoid legal repercussions for using third party guns they don’t have the rights to. However the fact that XDefiant has named all of these guns, especially the HK ones, just shows how scared Activision is to put in the money for basic features because it’s risky.
@@ele.mentalboi9562 most common theory is its Activision attempting to dodge blame for real world shootings, multiple shootings have been blamed on CoD and CoD has been used as an example of advertising firearms in lawsuits related to shootings (Remington lawsuit mainly), also some recent bill was passed about advertising firearms to minors in california. its pretty well recorded that firearm companies will give out rights like candy since they generally aren't big companies (with one big exception being Glock) so for a game like CoD they'd jump at the chance to have their weapons included.
@@ph-1012 also, both social media and voice chat in game refers to the guns by their actual names, so in today’s society it makes little difference. Also, the RPK is still in and guess what any search of the gun brings up; “light machine gun variant” of the AK-47. We need to promote safety with firearms to children, not get them down their own rabbit holes so they can be law abiding citizens.
@@ele.mentalboi9562 you can't easily legally get a real RPK, M4, M16, etc though so its not really advertising anything specifically which is likely why they feel it's fine to use those names.
So as CoD, especially the declining amount of players As XDefiant has more potential to have better gameplay than CoD since it’s made by the ex-CoD devs
What I find really amusing is how accurate this is, especially when you look at some of the same bugs that crop up between them. In atleast division 1 (and I think I recall in the sequel, not sure though). A bunch of weapons had some animation bugs where the bolt would reciprocate out the back of the receiver such as on the RPK etc. In Xdefiant you can see exactly this happening with the mp7...
Let's be real Activision supports LGBT and Ubisoft doesn't, especially the famous Twitter reply on adding LGBT in Six Siege so XDefiant is already a winner xD
No, Ubisoft does as well. The picture was taken out of context, and if you go to the thread you’ll see that they actually said “no” to an anti-LGBTQ comment. Plus, Siege literally has a trans operator, Osa.
So your telling me, if i play a game and it's shit, and i want to change to the better one, i have to remember that the shitty game is developed by non lgbt supportive company and forget about every bad thing of that game?
I love how XDefiant actually used real firearm names!
and looks like a mobile game
@@boneymic2.04 How so? Because mobile games don’t have advanced textures, tessellation, sun spots, ambient occlusion, volumetric lighting, reflections, and realistic smoke.
because ubisoft is not US company that binded with california gun law like activision
@@williamwen3477 Yeah, but even before that law passed CoD used fake firearm names.
@@Frosty_V0 MW2 released after that law applied, right?
Xdefiant reminds me of gun sounds reminds me of indie fps games or aka sounds that are open source and free to use.
I like the detail both games have when reloading shotguns like the Remington you can see the player pushing the shell in which you're supposed to do instead of just halfass sliding it into the tube magazine.
Well XDefiant is way more arcade than COD but the real thing is that XDefiant is actually fun and good
lol no it's not
@trashcompactorYT yes it is. COD is absolute garbage and the only thing they care about is how many bundles can they sell
@@Megacooler96_Sincerely your average generic N 235 hater:
@@Megacooler96_don’t listen to that average CoD fan
@@misterceviche64451 comment lol
That topless AK of Xdefiant is truly something , unlike "kastov 762"
The point is to avoid legal repercussions for using third party guns they don’t have the rights to. However the fact that XDefiant has named all of these guns, especially the HK ones, just shows how scared Activision is to put in the money for basic features because it’s risky.
@@ele.mentalboi9562 most common theory is its Activision attempting to dodge blame for real world shootings, multiple shootings have been blamed on CoD and CoD has been used as an example of advertising firearms in lawsuits related to shootings (Remington lawsuit mainly), also some recent bill was passed about advertising firearms to minors in california. its pretty well recorded that firearm companies will give out rights like candy since they generally aren't big companies (with one big exception being Glock) so for a game like CoD they'd jump at the chance to have their weapons included.
@@ph-1012 So because a MP7 is named vel 46 in cod it reduces school shootings? The media and Activision need a mental asylum
@@ph-1012 also, both social media and voice chat in game refers to the guns by their actual names, so in today’s society it makes little difference. Also, the RPK is still in and guess what any search of the gun brings up; “light machine gun variant” of the AK-47. We need to promote safety with firearms to children, not get them down their own rabbit holes so they can be law abiding citizens.
@@ele.mentalboi9562 you can't easily legally get a real RPK, M4, M16, etc though so its not really advertising anything specifically which is likely why they feel it's fine to use those names.
I like how each game has a very distinguishable animation style from one another
This is cool and all but you should do a battlefield comparison as well
Hey can you tell me how you changed the weapons fov to be more low vertical😢 in codmw 2022
cod way better
Graphics and sounds? Yes
Gameplay? Absolutely not.
@@PearloryxXDfiant like a dog sh*t
@@Pearloryxluckily this is a weapon comparison
the models in xdefiant look much more like the real guns
Innit
No mp5 slap in xdefiant damn
The models of guns in xdefiant is very cool and agresive 😎😎😎😎
Xdefiant seems like typical ubisoft quality which sucks
So as CoD, especially the declining amount of players
As XDefiant has more potential to have better gameplay than CoD since it’s made by the ex-CoD devs
@@Pearloryx its cod clone trying to be a cod killer. It never works
@@kevinsteelflex7371 Its not trying to be a cod killer stop dickriding cod with the exception of cold war all the last cods were ass.
@@Pearloryxwhy are you dick riding that game so badly I see you in the comments saying how cod is trash
What I find really amusing is how accurate this is, especially when you look at some of the same bugs that crop up between them.
In atleast division 1 (and I think I recall in the sequel, not sure though). A bunch of weapons had some animation bugs where the bolt would reciprocate out the back of the receiver such as on the RPK etc.
In Xdefiant you can see exactly this happening with the mp7...
nearly the same
Promo_SM 😉
Let's be real
Activision supports LGBT and Ubisoft doesn't, especially the famous Twitter reply on adding LGBT in Six Siege so XDefiant is already a winner xD
No, Ubisoft does as well. The picture was taken out of context, and if you go to the thread you’ll see that they actually said “no” to an anti-LGBTQ comment. Plus, Siege literally has a trans operator, Osa.
Cringe
@@Frosty_V0 and a gay operator (flores)
@@Instantur also a non-binary operator, Sens.
So your telling me, if i play a game and it's shit, and i want to change to the better one, i have to remember that the shitty game is developed by non lgbt supportive company and forget about every bad thing of that game?