You can Absolutely do an amazing sequel. The key is that it must be done by people who love the source material, understand it and want to do right by it
Man, I had no idea Walt Disney wasn't a big fan of sequels. Well, he told stories his way, and we'll tell stories our way. 😊 Great video, Isaac! 😉👍 May your creativity be limitless! 😃
Maybe that explains why after the sucess of Snow White, he doesn't wanted to bring to life an undeveloped script and storyboards of a short film called "Snow White Returns", which is avaliable on UA-cam and the Diamond Edition of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves DVD.
Walt Disney was against doing sequels yet people at Disney did not listen to him like how Stephen Hillenburg was against SpongeBob getting spin-offs yet people at Nickelodeon didn't listen to him, and Lauren Faust did not wanted MLP to do multiple more antagonist redemptions yet people at Hasbro ignored what she said.
@@gtd5626 You did get it wrong; He had no issue with adaptations. Also, Hillenburg was not against spin-offs; Just that he wasn't sure they would work.
Clearly he would never allow it to be like this he would always make sure to keep Disney what it truly was, a family friendly company and they need to do it better again
Welcome back Isaac, It's no nice to see another upload from you again! As for the topic of the vid, You are right it does seem hard to believe that Walt Disney himself didn't believe in sequels. But at the same time from what I understand Walt also seemed to think that a lot of the animated features that he worked on were such masterpieces, That they didn't need sequels which was true.
Honestly, I can get Disney's side. I mean, sure, most of the films he made would lend themselves well to sequels purely based on the places and characters within, but the way they were written, and their conclusions, do make them seem like perfect, book-closing endings
@jeffreygao3956 Because at the time, his films weren't even franchises. Only exception that isn't live action from when he was alive that I know of is Winnie The Pooh, since he began to work on the second short before his death
Welcome back, Isaac 😃 I mostly agree with Walt’s stance to leave sequels alone. If it’s just repetition, or trying to cash in, don’t do it- let the original stand on its own and be remembered for the influence and magic it was. But if there is genuine passion and heart in a sequel that wants to keep a story going or try something new (like Kung Fu Panda, How to train your dragon films, Lion King 2 or Cinderella 3 (my favourites of the Disney directs for the genuine effort you can see in them or the crazy, unpredictability of C3), give them the time to do it justice and bring their A-game and “Keep Moving Forward” (Meet The Robinsons). It’s sad to see how the company has been churning out reboots, spin-offs, sequels and prequels to almost the complete exclusion of anything new (and what is new is often not done well like Wish), when Walt wouldn’t have wanted this.
In the era of sequels and remakes, I can’t help but think about the big slogan from Meet the Robinsons. “Keep moving forward.” Sequels aren’t always a bad thing, but nowadays they’re so safe and bland… no one wants to “move forward”.
I LOVE THIS. Love the sentiment, love being able to see what Walt was actually thinking. And of course your own journey. As a hilarious anecdote, it now makes way more sense that in a movie that I and my sister and I love from the 30's - It Happened One Night - Clark Gable starts singing "Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf." 🤣🤣
I can't be the only one that during Walt Disneys Animating days such as Bambi, The Fox and The Hound, Peter Pan, Dumbo, Sleeping Beauty, Winnie the Pooh, Fantasia and many many many more, that some movies didn't need Sequels but they were worth the watch. For example: we didn't need a Bambi II but Bambi II gave us the precious moment of Bambi bonding and building a relationship with his dad after his mom's passing in the first one. We didn't Need a brother Bear II, But Brother Bear II gave Kenai the chance to find love and build his friendship. now there are some movies that should have been left alone. The Fox and The Hound, the original was already a masterpiece. but Disney gave us The Fox and The Hound II, in my opinion it wasn't needed. The Fox and The hound II should started with Todd and Vixen having a family making Mama guardian like figure and the 2 birds make sure they veered from Danger. instead Disney was like "Who's Vixen?" cuz they took all that character development from the original and *immitates splat sound* just destroyed it. they made them pup and kit again. do you all get what I am saying?
People saying Walt Disney would be disappointed now over there being sequels, meanwhile me thinking “Times change over the decade…..mindsets of others change…. So yes, of course there are some who will later run the company that would do sequels in the future…….some people don’t have the same views or mindset….as Walt sometimes when it comes to sequels”.
I will openly admit that a lot of the Disney sequels are flawed in their own way like major hot take: but I find LK2 Simba’s Pride to be very overrated and it just doesn’t sink well to me as a direct follow up to the original film. But still I don’t think there’s anything wrong with doing more with these franchises as long as they’re given the time and effort to be worthwhile and I do believe there should be a good balance between sequels/spin-offs and original stories.
I don't know if Walt Disney hated sequels, since there's a book in The Disney Archives called "Future Fantasias" sketches and storyboards for possible new Fantasia films.
@@christianhardtofind6349 Something tells me that hand-drawn animators were miles more charitable to needy audiences now that you mention it, because the slow zooming on the framed photo of Walt could represent those typical complaints that were easily triggered when the announcement was made for Disney's Feature Animation Division to delve into the All CGI Cartoon direction in order to keep up with their own subsidiary Pixar and their rivals DreamWorks and Blue Sky that they were mostly losing ground to during the first few years of the Post-Renaissance Era that was done as a clever parody of Jafar's villain song, otherwise known as the reprise of Prince Ali: ua-cam.com/video/0koCRLxQWZ4/v-deo.htmlsi=EKKHoENLP2AoJifi&t=27457s
Kinda fitting for a video about Walt to be the newest upload. Just over a week ago, I got a copy of the Disneyland 60th Anniversary CD Collection and the first track is literally Walt's speech at the opening of Disneyland.
Normally I do like sequels to certain film franchises, but sometimes they really aren't needed because it doesn't pave a way for more Original Stories to be made I get what walt is saying but as we have the right people who are dedicated to the soruce material than sequels can work
Hey Isaac since it's been a while since you did a Monsters Inc video can you do a full story of Randall Boggs and how he returned to the Monster World?
I just saw Transformers one and it was amazing. Really hope they make a trilogy. I know this is unrelated to the video and everything, but I just wanted to mention that.
A sequel to Mary Poppins had been gestating in development hell since the first film's release in 1964. Walt Disney attempted to produce a sequel a year later but was rejected by the author P. L. Travers, who dismissed Disney's first adaptation.
This is the only thing from Walt that I don't agree with. While I understand where he's coming from, I think you can make sequels that are amazing and in some cases better then the first. Toy Story 2, Inside Out 2, and to some extent The Lion King 2 being the...well, two, best examples of this, and some of the future sequels like Zootopia 2, also have a chance at being great. Especially if said sequel is made by those who understand and love the original, and want to do right by it.
I would argue that Zootopia 2 has the only real chance of being great, because Moana 2 is literally just the remnants of an abandoned TV show (which gives Belle’s Magical World and Atlantis Milo’s Return a little too much for my taste, even if it’ll probably have a more clear cut plot than those) and Toy Story 5 has been roasted by most of the Internet years before it even drops, so even if the critics love it like I’m sure they will, I doubt I’ll be able to say the same about audiences. But hey, at least neither of them are as brainless an idea as Ice Age 6 (without the assistance of Blue Sky) so I guess there’s that 😂😅
In the first in side out vi thought falling in the memory dump was falling out of the mind. But in the sequel The belief system is below the. Memory. Dump . Maybe it's going down to her soul
Here's a idea for a video. Mr. Smee's full Backstory/Story Video. You've gone into topic about Hook in past before but I'm pretty sure you've haven't done Smee.
Not all Sequels for movies are beloved. Frozen II and Inside Out 2 are a huge success but The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea and Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp’s Adventure, not so much
First off, welcome back, Isaac; secondly, while I also don't agree with this, here's something to think about: we've had quite a few original projects come out in the past couple of years (Elemental, Wish, etc), and people still weren't satisfied. A lot of the folks who gripe about this also are the same ones who will watch those sequels and steer away from the new movies that are announced. Maybe if they would actually give that content an honest chance (even reevaluate some of them), the companies wouldn't have to lean in this direction constantly.
Youre right,while Sequels arent inherently bad,you cannot just repeat what came before without adding something new at the same time.While Sequels can be good you should also strive to create something new and inovative as well!To explore new grounds and create something new and exciting! As walt said: "Kepp moving forward"
Walt was such an amazing person. While his belief was no sequels. It IS possible to make fantastic sequels. My favorite example is Stuart Little 2 (not 3 that one was not so great. :/ ). It featured Stuart and his brother George becoming older. And filling Stuart with a desire for epic adventures. I also LOVE Disney history. So I am 100% on board with seeing more. :D
The thing is, Walt didn't have to compete with anyone. No Disney has to compete for viewers eyes with hours of streaming, cheaper made animated movies from others and the entirety of UA-cam. Get rid of all of that and Disney won't have to make sequels or remakes anymore. Competition does not breed creativity or innovation.
Something interesting to note is that during the “What Would Walt Have Done” era, the aging executives in charge apparently didn’t get the memo about sequels because they went all-in on live action sequels. Of course, the key word is *live-action,* because sequels to anything in the animated canon were still off-limits until Rescuers Down Under. I think it was partly because Walt did indeed do a sequel to the (live-action) Absent Minded Professor - that would be Son of Flubber - but for an era obsessed with trying to recapture his magic, to decreasing returns year by year, I don’t think the amount of (again, live-action) sequels in the 70s and 80s were what he had in mind
Don't worry Isaac Sequels and prequels are the greatest along with originals no harm, cause they have fun experiences and kind wisdom, we shall never rest until the Disney sequels and prequels from DisneyToon Studios are reunited for good.
Technically, it is true, but not fully. Walt did want to do a sequel to Fantasia or do this little technique where he would rerelease Fantasia every few years with a new musical segment. But because of World War 2 and Fantasia's international box office being very low, the plans got scrapped. A segment which was meant to be for Fantasia 2 was called Clair de Lune with the storks. But it was later converted as a segment to Make Mine Music and be renamed Blue Bayou. Before Rescuers Down Under, there was a film that also got a sequel and that was released during Walt's lifetime, The Three Caballeros, which was a sequel to Saludos Amigos. From what I understand, they were made because America needed to recruit some Latin American soldiers as allies to help them fight in World War 2.
This is a personal question. Nando V Movies made multiple themes for One __ Scene. What would be your pick for One Marvelous Scene, One X-Cellent Scene, One Musical Scene, One Villainous Scene and One Last Scene?
Disney di plan on making a "sequel" to Fantasia it was ment to be a series to introduce Classical music to the masses but since it was considered a failure he scrapped the plans
He didn't like sequels. He's also been dead for almost 60 years. You can't run a company in 2024 the same way it was run in the first half of the 20th century.
@IsaacCarlson Seriously, what about these: Why Shanti acts like a big sister to Ranjan What if Professor Sam Tucker survived Planet Earth’s destruction Why Buster believes a Junkyard Dog should not help others
Hot take, but what "Frozen 3 and 4" are doing is what I want for abimated sequels: a CONNECTED story, setting things up rather than an unrelated continuation.
Can I ask you a favor? Can you tell Daisy Duck’s full story or a list of missing Toons in Chip and Dale rescue Rangers, like Flounder from the little mermaid or Sneezy from Snow White and the seven dwarfs or Bambi or Patrick Star or Jiminy cricket or Tiana in her frog form from the Princess and the frog or Lightning McQueen and Sally’s love story? Can you also talk about legend of the three Caballeros or Once upon a studio.
Just imagine if Walt Disney was alive today and his company popping out nasty depressing garbage remakes, and sequels that flop at the box office, except for making creative ideas
Sounds like Walt Disney understood the merit of "be reckless". As in don't be afraid to fail in doing something new. If you fail, then find out what didn't work then try again. If you succeed, then move the next idea.
Um… had to pause at around 7 minutes because I think you made a mistake. Fantasia 2000 and Return to Neverland were not direct to video movies. I saw both in the theaters
mr krabs: hello i like money. Walt Disney: well i hate Sequels. Mr Krabs: Well watch this. After watching The Sandy Cheeks movie. Walt Disney: well i guess that Sponge on the run deserves a Apology from the fans. Mr Krabs: Nickelodeon is Milking us dry.
Damn, if Walt was so disdainful about sequels to his movies, just imagine how he would've reacted to Disney remaking his older movies into live action...
lol Walt tried to get the rights to make a Mary Poppins sequel from PL Travers. Only reason it didn’t happen is because she didn’t like the first one. I suppose that’s just one example, though.
He did also make early concept plans to adapt Bambi's Children, but it didn't go past that. I feel like Walt maybe wasn't TOTALLY against sequels, but more he didn't prioritise them.
I had something I was curious about. With all her power, why do you think Maleficent never permanently got rid of the three good fairies who were constantly in her way? Was there a rule that fairies couldn't hurt each other? Or was she just keeping them around because she felt she was better than them, to make herself feel better?
So, when a person took over after his death, eventually, they started to make his company the opposite of what it was meant to do, the current people of the company are turning the company into Disney’s worst nightmare
By the way Walt Disney did approve a sequel to The Absent Minded Professor 1961 with Son of Flubber 1963. Also he made many Donald Duck, Goofy, Mickey Mouse cartoon shorts some of them ending on cliffhangers like Donald Duck cartoons Modern Inventions 1937, Window Cleaners 1940, Inferior Decorator 1948. He did make 3 sequels to The Three Little Pigs and a Sequel to The Tortoise and the Hare and Santa's Workshop 1932 followed by The Night Before Christmas 1933. Also a Donald Duck cartoon How to have an accident at Home was followed up by How to have an accident at Work. Yes even Jiminy Cricket from Disney Pinocchio 1940 was in Fun Fancy and Free and in the I'm no Fool shorts. Also Walt Disney had trouble getting the rights to Mary Poppins because P L Travers didn't like the way Walt Disney and his team was making Mary Poppins 1964 film, and after that film she ruled out any further adaptations of the later Mary Poppins novels and it wouldn't get a sequel until after her death in 1996 and then in 2018 a sequel Mary Poppins returns was made.
You can Absolutely do an amazing sequel. The key is that it must be done by people who love the source material, understand it and want to do right by it
Which Disney has done at least a few times.
@@harmonetheanimationaddict4419 unfortunately, it's not the case so much anymore
Couldn't have said it better myself 👍🏻
Indeed
True some sequels do outstand the original
Walt Disney Truly Felt Like a Really Great Person with a Heart Full of Love.
More like a miser merchant unworthy of measuring up to the master of fantastica, Tolkien.
@@jeffreygao3956 You take that back! Walt Disney was totally as imaginative as JRR Tolkien!
Except when the animators go on strike
@@jeffreygao3956 😡💢💢Watch your mouth! How DARE you say such a stupid thing?! Walt Disney is TOTALLY worthy of measuring up to JRR Tolkien!
@@annien.1727 Well among them, who got hippie friends and who kissed McCarthy's butt?
Man, I had no idea Walt Disney wasn't a big fan of sequels. Well, he told stories his way, and we'll tell stories our way. 😊
Great video, Isaac! 😉👍
May your creativity be limitless! 😃
Maybe that explains why after the sucess of Snow White, he doesn't wanted to bring to life an undeveloped script and storyboards of a short film called "Snow White Returns", which is avaliable on UA-cam and the Diamond Edition of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves DVD.
That makes me lose lots of respect for him.
As much as Walt Disney hated the idea of sequels I find them to be hits or misses.
Given their reputation, it makes sense why Walt Disney didn't want to make sequels
I mean, some of them have achieved very good quality, like Frozen 2
Kind of miss opportunity on Disney's part,
I would actually love to see how a sequel movie would look like if he directed it
Son of Flubber
Yeaj
@@yosefdemby8792
I know, but I was talking about a animated movie
I know, I actually meant an animated movie
@@slenderfan-101j.g.4 yeah, it'd be nice to see how an animated sequel would be from his vision
Walt Disney was against doing sequels yet people at Disney did not listen to him
like how Stephen Hillenburg was against SpongeBob getting spin-offs yet people at Nickelodeon didn't listen to him, and Lauren Faust did not wanted MLP to do multiple more antagonist redemptions yet people at Hasbro ignored what she said.
Going against wishes is a very low deed for greed
Don't forget Dr. Seuss
@@gtd5626 What do you mean by Dr. Seuss?
@@dianeeasley9815 I thought that he didn't want his books into movies, but I may be wrong.
@@gtd5626 You did get it wrong; He had no issue with adaptations.
Also, Hillenburg was not against spin-offs; Just that he wasn't sure they would work.
If Walt was still alive today, he’d be ashamed of what Disney had become.
Clearly he would never allow it to be like this he would always make sure to keep Disney what it truly was, a family friendly company and they need to do it better again
Glad to have you back, Isaac!!!
Kind of ironic that The Three Little Pigs and The Big Bad Wolf just got in the mobile game Disney Magic Kingdoms.
Yep.
Wow, you're playing that game too!
@@ching-jungyang62I have not played that game in a while, I should check out the addition of the pigs and the wolf. 😂
One of the best Disney sequels in my opinion is Cinderella iii: A twist in time
Thats a dvd only sequel which is NOT CANON
The rescuers down under
@chickenlittleunderated is right it is not canon meaning it did not happen in the Disney Cinderella universe sorry chrislong8986😅😅😅
It doesn't matter if it's a dvd sequel or not it is still a sequel even if in was released in theaters to make it cannon
@@jenniferpowell9655 In what world is canon decided by whether or not something was released to theaters?
“You can’t top pigs with pigs.”
Welcome back Isaac, It's no nice to see another upload from you again! As for the topic of the vid, You are right it does seem hard to believe that Walt Disney himself didn't believe in sequels. But at the same time from what I understand Walt also seemed to think that a lot of the animated features that he worked on were such masterpieces, That they didn't need sequels which was true.
Does that mean they're not masterpieces anymore? 😂
@@Pixlewatchtoo Did I say that?
@@TheCommenterDragon yeah, sonetimes a story dosen't always need a follow up, depending on how well it's wrapped up
Honestly, I can get Disney's side. I mean, sure, most of the films he made would lend themselves well to sequels purely based on the places and characters within, but the way they were written, and their conclusions, do make them seem like perfect, book-closing endings
I don't; History doesn't end, why should franchises?
@jeffreygao3956 Because at the time, his films weren't even franchises. Only exception that isn't live action from when he was alive that I know of is Winnie The Pooh, since he began to work on the second short before his death
Feels like an excuse for leaving shallow world building; Give me a backstory on every family tree branch!
Welcome back, Isaac 😃 I mostly agree with Walt’s stance to leave sequels alone. If it’s just repetition, or trying to cash in, don’t do it- let the original stand on its own and be remembered for the influence and magic it was. But if there is genuine passion and heart in a sequel that wants to keep a story going or try something new (like Kung Fu Panda, How to train your dragon films, Lion King 2 or Cinderella 3 (my favourites of the Disney directs for the genuine effort you can see in them or the crazy, unpredictability of C3), give them the time to do it justice and bring their A-game and “Keep Moving Forward” (Meet The Robinsons). It’s sad to see how the company has been churning out reboots, spin-offs, sequels and prequels to almost the complete exclusion of anything new (and what is new is often not done well like Wish), when Walt wouldn’t have wanted this.
Welcome back, Isacc Carlson! I'm happy to see you again! ❤️❤️👍🏻⭐⭐
Welcome back isaac! Love your content ❤❤❤❤
In the era of sequels and remakes, I can’t help but think about the big slogan from Meet the Robinsons. “Keep moving forward.” Sequels aren’t always a bad thing, but nowadays they’re so safe and bland… no one wants to “move forward”.
Nope; Worlds are meant to be more whole and sequels are better than fanfic.
I LOVE THIS. Love the sentiment, love being able to see what Walt was actually thinking. And of course your own journey. As a hilarious anecdote, it now makes way more sense that in a movie that I and my sister and I love from the 30's - It Happened One Night - Clark Gable starts singing "Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf." 🤣🤣
I can't be the only one that during Walt Disneys Animating days such as Bambi, The Fox and The Hound, Peter Pan, Dumbo, Sleeping Beauty, Winnie the Pooh, Fantasia and many many many more, that some movies didn't need Sequels but they were worth the watch. For example: we didn't need a Bambi II but Bambi II gave us the precious moment of Bambi bonding and building a relationship with his dad after his mom's passing in the first one.
We didn't Need a brother Bear II, But Brother Bear II gave Kenai the chance to find love and build his friendship.
now there are some movies that should have been left alone. The Fox and The Hound, the original was already a masterpiece. but Disney gave us The Fox and The Hound II, in my opinion it wasn't needed. The Fox and The hound II should started with Todd and Vixen having a family making Mama guardian like figure and the 2 birds make sure they veered from Danger. instead Disney was like "Who's Vixen?" cuz they took all that character development from the original and *immitates splat sound* just destroyed it. they made them pup and kit again.
do you all get what I am saying?
I love the direction you're taking the channel! Thank you Isaac!
People saying Walt Disney would be disappointed now over there being sequels, meanwhile me thinking “Times change over the decade…..mindsets of others change…. So yes, of course there are some who will later run the company that would do sequels in the future…….some people don’t have the same views or mindset….as Walt sometimes when it comes to sequels”.
There was a pixar sequel ad before your video lol
That's a completely different company that modern-day Disney bought out, so as far as I know, they can do whatever they want.
I will openly admit that a lot of the Disney sequels are flawed in their own way like major hot take: but I find LK2 Simba’s Pride to be very overrated and it just doesn’t sink well to me as a direct follow up to the original film. But still I don’t think there’s anything wrong with doing more with these franchises as long as they’re given the time and effort to be worthwhile and I do believe there should be a good balance between sequels/spin-offs and original stories.
I don't know if Walt Disney hated sequels, since there's a book in The Disney Archives called "Future Fantasias" sketches and storyboards for possible new Fantasia films.
4:56 are those the same 3 kittens from Tom and Jerry when Tom goes to Heaven?
Thank you for this well presented info about Walt!
He must have been spinning in his grave in the 1990s and 2000s over all the direct-to-dvd sequels. Some good. Others not so much.
Now I know why sequelitis was a very common reception during that trend. As of now, remakeitis is the way to go.
That’s a good point
Imagine how much he's spinning in his grave with Disney's current state of affairs.
@@christianhardtofind6349 Let's just say he's discovered hyperspace jumping.
@@christianhardtofind6349 Something tells me that hand-drawn animators were miles more charitable to needy audiences now that you mention it, because the slow zooming on the framed photo of Walt could represent those typical complaints that were easily triggered when the announcement was made for Disney's Feature Animation Division to delve into the All CGI Cartoon direction in order to keep up with their own subsidiary Pixar and their rivals DreamWorks and Blue Sky that they were mostly losing ground to during the first few years of the Post-Renaissance Era that was done as a clever parody of Jafar's villain song, otherwise known as the reprise of Prince Ali:
ua-cam.com/video/0koCRLxQWZ4/v-deo.htmlsi=EKKHoENLP2AoJifi&t=27457s
I second that!! Glad to have you back!
Welcome back Isaac Carlson 😁
Welcome Back Isaac
When the wild robot comes out, will you do videos on that?
Kinda fitting for a video about Walt to be the newest upload.
Just over a week ago, I got a copy of the Disneyland 60th Anniversary CD Collection and the first track is literally Walt's speech at the opening of Disneyland.
Normally I do like sequels to certain film franchises, but sometimes they really aren't needed because it doesn't pave a way for more Original Stories to be made I get what walt is saying but as we have the right people who are dedicated to the soruce material than sequels can work
Originality is an illusion.
I'm happy for incredible getting third movie
Really, fans have problems with the second one.
Hey Isaac since it's been a while since you did a Monsters Inc video can you do a full story of Randall Boggs and how he returned to the Monster World?
Yeah. That would be cool. 😎
That's stupid since sequels expand the universe of a story
Thanks for posting the video.
I just saw Transformers one and it was amazing. Really hope they make a trilogy. I know this is unrelated to the video and everything, but I just wanted to mention that.
A sequel to Mary Poppins had been gestating in development hell since the first film's release in 1964. Walt Disney attempted to produce a sequel a year later but was rejected by the author P. L. Travers, who dismissed Disney's first adaptation.
That's odd. I recall reading a book where he declined to make a sequel.
I guess this explains why that Snow White sequel “Snow White Returns” was never finished.
This is the only thing from Walt that I don't agree with. While I understand where he's coming from, I think you can make sequels that are amazing and in some cases better then the first. Toy Story 2, Inside Out 2, and to some extent The Lion King 2 being the...well, two, best examples of this, and some of the future sequels like Zootopia 2, also have a chance at being great. Especially if said sequel is made by those who understand and love the original, and want to do right by it.
I would argue that Zootopia 2 has the only real chance of being great, because Moana 2 is literally just the remnants of an abandoned TV show (which gives Belle’s Magical World and Atlantis Milo’s Return a little too much for my taste, even if it’ll probably have a more clear cut plot than those) and Toy Story 5 has been roasted by most of the Internet years before it even drops, so even if the critics love it like I’m sure they will, I doubt I’ll be able to say the same about audiences. But hey, at least neither of them are as brainless an idea as Ice Age 6 (without the assistance of Blue Sky) so I guess there’s that 😂😅
The Lion King 2 was mediocre.
Good point!
New book to add to my reading list.
In the first in side out vi thought falling in the memory dump was falling out of the mind. But in the sequel The belief system is below the. Memory. Dump . Maybe it's going down to her soul
What if the story is to big to fit in one movie
Don't you love it when a company does the exact things their creators hate?
Yup! (He said sarcastically.)
(Cough) Nickelodeon (Cough)
@@JaviSocas2My2ndChannel What did Dr. Vivian Horner hate?
@yosefdemby8792 I don't know who Dr. Vivian Homer is? And I was talking about Stephen Hillenburg and his hatred for SpongeBob spinoffs.
@@JaviSocas2My2ndChannel Oh. Mea Culpa. Horner founded Nickelodeon.
Good to see you again, Isaac! 😁👍💓
It's been a while....
Fun fact, Walt Disney himself only did one sequel to a live action movie. But I don't remember the name.😅
Here's a idea for a video. Mr. Smee's full Backstory/Story Video. You've gone into topic about Hook in past before but I'm pretty sure you've haven't done Smee.
Not all Sequels for movies are beloved.
Frozen II and Inside Out 2 are a huge success but The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea and Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp’s Adventure, not so much
First off, welcome back, Isaac; secondly, while I also don't agree with this, here's something to think about: we've had quite a few original projects come out in the past couple of years (Elemental, Wish, etc), and people still weren't satisfied. A lot of the folks who gripe about this also are the same ones who will watch those sequels and steer away from the new movies that are announced. Maybe if they would actually give that content an honest chance (even reevaluate some of them), the companies wouldn't have to lean in this direction constantly.
What if Pixar did another movie about insect designed completely different
Nothing Disney ever did was an original story. To do sequels to those stories, he would have had to come up with new material.
Youre right,while Sequels arent inherently bad,you cannot just repeat what came before without adding something new at the same time.While Sequels can be good you should also strive to create something new and inovative as well!To explore new grounds and create something new and exciting!
As walt said: "Kepp moving forward"
Walt was such an amazing person. While his belief was no sequels. It IS possible to make fantastic sequels.
My favorite example is Stuart Little 2 (not 3 that one was not so great. :/ ). It featured Stuart and his brother George becoming older. And filling Stuart with a desire for epic adventures.
I also LOVE Disney history. So I am 100% on board with seeing more. :D
The thing is, Walt didn't have to compete with anyone. No Disney has to compete for viewers eyes with hours of streaming, cheaper made animated movies from others and the entirety of UA-cam. Get rid of all of that and Disney won't have to make sequels or remakes anymore. Competition does not breed creativity or innovation.
Something interesting to note is that during the “What Would Walt Have Done” era, the aging executives in charge apparently didn’t get the memo about sequels because they went all-in on live action sequels. Of course, the key word is *live-action,* because sequels to anything in the animated canon were still off-limits until Rescuers Down Under.
I think it was partly because Walt did indeed do a sequel to the (live-action) Absent Minded Professor - that would be Son of Flubber - but for an era obsessed with trying to recapture his magic, to decreasing returns year by year, I don’t think the amount of (again, live-action) sequels in the 70s and 80s were what he had in mind
This is kind of like how the SpongeBob created didn’t believe in spinoffs yet they created spinoffs
The Disney company needs to read this book because it's about time they go back to their roots and try to start something new
Indeed.
@@yosefdemby8792 Thank you that's why they lost their magic they completely forgot what Walt Disney wanted
Man, Disney seems to be running out of ideas these days to the point where they think we're behaving like spoiled brats or something!
@@SaraHouck461 They are just not original anymore
@@SaraHouck461 Maybe because to some degree you are
I like Sequels especially The Sequel Trilogy of Star Wars
Can you please do a more in depth review of the major downfall of Disney as a whole in the last 10 years.
Don't worry Isaac Sequels and prequels are the greatest along with originals no harm, cause they have fun experiences and kind wisdom, we shall never rest until the Disney sequels and prequels from DisneyToon Studios are reunited for good.
Isaac Carlson I didn't knew that Walt Disney hated sequels. What happened to made him hate sequels?
Technically, it is true, but not fully. Walt did want to do a sequel to Fantasia or do this little technique where he would rerelease Fantasia every few years with a new musical segment. But because of World War 2 and Fantasia's international box office being very low, the plans got scrapped. A segment which was meant to be for Fantasia 2 was called Clair de Lune with the storks. But it was later converted as a segment to Make Mine Music and be renamed Blue Bayou.
Before Rescuers Down Under, there was a film that also got a sequel and that was released during Walt's lifetime, The Three Caballeros, which was a sequel to Saludos Amigos. From what I understand, they were made because America needed to recruit some Latin American soldiers as allies to help them fight in World War 2.
Aladdin 1992 The Return Of Jafar 1994 The King Of Thieves 1996. The Fox And The Hound 1981. The Fox And The Hound 2 2006.
If Walt were alive today, he’d have WAY more disgust in what his company is doing than we think.
Yet, Walt Disney is not running the company.
Really? I had no idea
This is a personal question. Nando V Movies made multiple themes for One __ Scene. What would be your pick for One Marvelous Scene, One X-Cellent Scene, One Musical Scene, One Villainous Scene and One Last Scene?
That's exactly what Stephen Hillenburg said about his SpongeBob series.
And Nickelodeon is going against his wishes because they are obsessed with money
No, he didn't. He said he couldn't see them happening. Not that he didn't want them.
@@BlurroBlue Looks like Mr. Enter just got checkmated!
Disney di plan on making a "sequel" to Fantasia it was ment to be a series to introduce Classical music to the masses but since it was considered a failure he scrapped the plans
He didn't like sequels. He's also been dead for almost 60 years. You can't run a company in 2024 the same way it was run in the first half of the 20th century.
@IsaacCarlson
Seriously, what about these:
Why Shanti acts like a big sister to Ranjan
What if Professor Sam Tucker survived Planet Earth’s destruction
Why Buster believes a Junkyard Dog should not help others
Looks like Disney just got discredited more!
Sequels need to be important
“You can’t top Pigs with Pigs”- Walt Disney
Hot take, but what "Frozen 3 and 4" are doing is what I want for abimated sequels: a CONNECTED story, setting things up rather than an unrelated continuation.
Wait, he...didn't?
He seldom made them.
Can I ask you a favor? Can you tell Daisy Duck’s full story or a list of missing Toons in Chip and Dale rescue Rangers, like Flounder from the little mermaid or Sneezy from Snow White and the seven dwarfs or Bambi or Patrick Star or Jiminy cricket or Tiana in her frog form from the Princess and the frog or Lightning McQueen and Sally’s love story?
Can you also talk about legend of the three Caballeros or Once upon a studio.
We need a new Walt Disney today
Agreed. 👍
That's right! We need a Walt Disney sequel!
@@oliverbrownlow5615 no that’s not what I meant, I mean Walt Disney the founder of the company
Money is not an option
Sequels are good for stories too big for one movie alone.
Just imagine if Walt Disney was alive today and his company popping out nasty depressing garbage remakes, and sequels that flop at the box office, except for making creative ideas
Sounds like Walt Disney understood the merit of "be reckless". As in don't be afraid to fail in doing something new. If you fail, then find out what didn't work then try again. If you succeed, then move the next idea.
Man...newness seems like a difficult-as-hell heavenly virtue to abide by these days!
Um… had to pause at around 7 minutes because I think you made a mistake. Fantasia 2000 and Return to Neverland were not direct to video movies. I saw both in the theaters
Theres nothing wrong with sequels as long as there is a good reason to do one other than "we need more money."
When they kick out John Lassenter, the Sequels are Moving Theatrically.
mr krabs: hello i like money.
Walt Disney: well i hate Sequels.
Mr Krabs: Well watch this.
After watching The Sandy Cheeks movie.
Walt Disney: well i guess that Sponge on the run deserves a Apology from the fans.
Mr Krabs: Nickelodeon is Milking us dry.
So do l, Walt. So do I.
Damn, if Walt was so disdainful about sequels to his movies, just imagine how he would've reacted to Disney remaking his older movies into live action...
He'd retch in fury.
lol Walt tried to get the rights to make a Mary Poppins sequel from PL Travers. Only reason it didn’t happen is because she didn’t like the first one. I suppose that’s just one example, though.
He did also make early concept plans to adapt Bambi's Children, but it didn't go past that. I feel like Walt maybe wasn't TOTALLY against sequels, but more he didn't prioritise them.
Eisner, Iger & Chapek: …
Do Transformers ONE next!
Was Hollywood ever original m before they did books novels
True. All of Disney's non-anthology animated movies made during Walt Disney's lifetime were based on preexisting stories.
@@yosefdemby8792 what about TLK
It’s no wonder why the animated version of Alice in Wonderland never got a sequel
Why does Walt D. Hated Sequels like that?
I had something I was curious about. With all her power, why do you think Maleficent never permanently got rid of the three good fairies who were constantly in her way? Was there a rule that fairies couldn't hurt each other? Or was she just keeping them around because she felt she was better than them, to make herself feel better?
So, when a person took over after his death, eventually, they started to make his company the opposite of what it was meant to do, the current people of the company are turning the company into Disney’s worst nightmare
Awesome as always thanks ❤
By the way Walt Disney did approve a sequel to The Absent Minded Professor 1961 with Son of Flubber 1963. Also he made many Donald Duck, Goofy, Mickey Mouse cartoon shorts some of them ending on cliffhangers like Donald Duck cartoons Modern Inventions 1937, Window Cleaners 1940, Inferior Decorator 1948. He did make 3 sequels to The Three Little Pigs and a Sequel to The Tortoise and the Hare and Santa's Workshop 1932 followed by The Night Before Christmas 1933. Also a Donald Duck cartoon How to have an accident at Home was followed up by How to have an accident at Work. Yes even Jiminy Cricket from Disney Pinocchio 1940 was in Fun Fancy and Free and in the I'm no Fool shorts.
Also Walt Disney had trouble getting the rights to Mary Poppins because P L Travers didn't like the way Walt Disney and his team was making Mary Poppins 1964 film, and after that film she ruled out any further adaptations of the later Mary Poppins novels and it wouldn't get a sequel until after her death in 1996 and then in 2018 a sequel Mary Poppins returns was made.